DOCSLIB.ORG

Generalized Tilting Theory in Functor Categories

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Generalized Tilting Theory in Functor Categories Table of content Motivation and Introduction Main results Applications Generalized tilting theory in functor categories Xi Tang April 25, 2019 logo Table of content Motivation and Introduction Main results Applications Table of content 1 Motivation and Introduction 2 Main results Equivalences induced by T A cotorsion pair 3 Applications An isomorphism of Grothendieck groups An abelian model structure A t-structure induced by T logo Table of content Motivation and Introduction Main results Applications References S. Bazzoni, The t-structure induced by an n- tilting module, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. (to ap- pear). R. Mart´ınez-Villa and M. Ortiz-Morales, Tilting theory and functor categories I. Classical tilt- ing, Appl. Categ. Struct. 22 (2014), 595–646. R. Mart´ınez-Villa and M. Ortiz-Morales, Tilting theory and functor categories II. Generalized tilting, Appl. Categ. Struct. 21 (2013), 311– logo 348. Table of content Motivation and Introduction Main results Applications Motivation K algebraically closed field Λ finite dimensional K-algebra TΛ tilting module Γ := End(T)op Brenner-Butler Tilting Theorem The following statements hold. (1) (T (T); F(T)) is a torsion theory, where 1 T (T) := fM 2 mod Λ j ExtΛ(T; M) = 0g; logo F(T) := fM 2 mod Λ j HomΛ(T; M) = 0g: Table of content Motivation and Introduction Main results Applications Motivation (2) (X (T); Y(T)) is a torsion theory, where X (T) := fN 2 mod Γ j N ⊗Γ T = 0g; Γ Y(T) := fN 2 mod Γ j Tor1 (N; T) = 0g. (3) There are two category equivalences: T (T) F(T) g 7 s s w ' X (T) Y(T): logo Table of content Motivation and Introduction Main results Applications R associative ring TR n-tilting module S := End(T)op Miyashita Theorem There are category equivalences: e ExtR(T;−) n / n KE (TR) KT (ST); where e o s e S Tore (−;T) n i KEe (TR) := fM j ExtR(T; M) = 0; 0 6 i 6= e 6 ng; n S logo KTe (ST) := fN j Tori (N; T) = 0; 0 6 i 6= e 6 ng. Table of content Motivation and Introduction Main results Applications Questions Observation Mod(R) ∼= Fun(R; Ab). Replace R with any additive category C, what will happen to the two classical results? (1) How to define tilting objects in functor cate- gories? (2) Can we extend Brenner-Butler Theorem to functor categories? (3) Can we extend Miyashita Theorem to functor logo categories? Table of content Motivation and Introduction Main results Applications Questions Observation Mod(R) ∼= Fun(R; Ab). Replace R with any additive category C, what will happen to the two classical results? (1) How to define tilting objects in functor cate- gories? (2) Can we extend Brenner-Butler Theorem to functor categories? (3) Can we extend Miyashita Theorem to functor logo categories? Table of content Motivation and Introduction Main results Applications Introduction C annuli variety Mod(C):=Fun(Cop; Ab) T ⊆ Mod(C) C(Mod(C)) the category of complexes in Mod(C) D(Mod(C)) the derived category of Mod(C) logo Table of content Motivation and Introduction Main results Applications Preliminaries Definition 1.1.1 (Mart´ınezand Ortiz, 2013) T is generalized tilting if the following hold. (1) There exists a fixed integer n such that every object T in T has a projective resolution 0 ! Pn !···! P1 ! P0 ! T ! 0; with each Pi finitely generated. i>1 0 0 (2) ExtC (T; T ) = 0 for any T and T in T . (3) For each C( ; C), there is an exact resolution 0 m 0 !C( ; C) ! TC !···! TC ! 0; logo i with TC in T . Table of content Motivation and Introduction Main results Applications Definition 1.1.2 T is n-tilting if it is generalized tilting with pdim T 6 n and for each C( ; C), there is an ex- act resolution 0 n 0 !C( ; C) ! TC !···! TC ! 0; i with TC in T . Example 1.1.3 Let Λ be an artin R-algebra and let C = add Λ. Assume that T is a classical n-tilting Λ-module. Then T = fC( ; M) j M 2 add Tg is n-tilting. logo Table of content Motivation and Introduction Main results Applications Definition 1.1.2 T is n-tilting if it is generalized tilting with pdim T 6 n and for each C( ; C), there is an ex- act resolution 0 n 0 !C( ; C) ! TC !···! TC ! 0; i with TC in T . Example 1.1.3 Let Λ be an artin R-algebra and let C = add Λ. Assume that T is a classical n-tilting Λ-module. Then T = fC( ; M) j M 2 add Tg is n-tilting. logo Table of content Motivation and Introduction Main results Applications Equivalences induced by T Equivalences induced by T Lemma 2.1.1(Mart´ınezand Ortiz, 2014) Let’s define the following functor: φ : Mod(C) ! Mod(T ); φ(M) := Hom( ; M)T : Then φ has a left adjoint: − ⊗ T : Mod(T ) ! Mod(C) such that T ( ; T) ⊗ T = T for any T 2 T . logo Table of content Motivation and Introduction Main results Applications Equivalences induced by T Theorem 2.1.2 Assume that T is n-tilting. Then for any 0 6 e 6 n, there are category equivalences e ExtC( ;−)T KEn(T ) / KTn(T ); where e o s e T Tore ( ;T ) n i KEe (T ) := fM j ExtC( ; M)T = 0; 0 6 i 6= e 6 ng; n T KTe (T ) := fN j Tori (N; T ) = 0; 0 6 i 6= e 6 ng. logo Table of content Motivation and Introduction Main results Applications A cotorsion pair T generalized tilting with pdim(T ) 6 n ?1 i>1 T := fM j ExtC (T; M) = 0 for T 2 T g Theorem 2.2.1 The following statements hold. (1) (?1 (T ?1 ); T ?1 ) is a hereditary and complete cotorsion pair. ? ? (2) pdim( 1 (T 1 )) 6 n. (3) ?1 (T ?1 ) \T ?1 = Add(T ). logo Table of content Motivation and Introduction Main results Applications An isomorphism of Grothendieck groups An isomorphism of Grothendieck groups Definition 3.1.1 (Mart´ınezand Ortiz, 2013) A :=< j mod(C)j >; R :=< [M] − [K] − [L] j 0 ! K ! M ! L ! 0 is exact in mod(C) >; The Grothendieck group of C is K0(C) := A=R. Theorem 3.1.2 Let C be an abelian category with enough injec- tives and T an n-tilting subcategory of mod(C) ∼ logo with pseudokernels. Then K0(C) = K0(T ). Table of content Motivation and Introduction Main results Applications An isomorphism of Grothendieck groups An isomorphism of Grothendieck groups Definition 3.1.1 (Mart´ınezand Ortiz, 2013) A :=< j mod(C)j >; R :=< [M] − [K] − [L] j 0 ! K ! M ! L ! 0 is exact in mod(C) >; The Grothendieck group of C is K0(C) := A=R. Theorem 3.1.2 Let C be an abelian category with enough injec- tives and T an n-tilting subcategory of mod(C) ∼ logo with pseudokernels. Then K0(C) = K0(T ). Table of content Motivation and Introduction Main results Applications An abelian model structure An abelian model structure Definition 3.2.1 (J. Gillespie 2004) Let (A; B) be a cotorsion pair on an abelian cat- egory C. Let X be a complex. (1) X is called an A(resp. B) complex if it is exact and Zn(X) 2 A(resp. Zn(X) 2 B) for all n. (2) X is called a dg-A complex if Xn 2 A for each n, and Hom(X; B) is exact whenever B is a B complex. (3) X is called a dg-B complex if Xn 2 B for each n, and Hom(A; X) is exact whenever A is an A logo complex. Table of content Motivation and Introduction Main results Applications An abelian model structure Notations T generalized tilting A :=?1 (T ?1 ) B := T ?1 A~ the class of A complexes B~ the class of B complexes dgA~ the class of dg-A complexes dgB~ the class of dg-B complexes logo Table of content Motivation and Introduction Main results Applications An abelian model structure Theorem 3.2.2 There is an abelian model structure on C(Mod(C)) given as follows: (1) Weak equivalences are quasi-isomorphisms, (2) Cofibrations (trivial cofibrations) consist of all the monomorphisms f such that Coker f 2 dgA~(Coker f 2 A~), (3) Fibrations (trivial fibrations) consist of all the epimorphisms g such that Ker g 2 dgB~(Ker g 2 B~). The homotopy category of this model category is logo D(Mod(C)). Table of content Motivation and Introduction Main results Applications An abelian model structure Definition 3.2.3(M. Hovey 2002) Suppose that an abelian category A has a model structure and X 2 A, X is trivial if 0 ! X is a weak equivalence, X is cofibrant if 0 ! X is a cofibration and X is fibrant if X ! 0 is a fibration. Corollary 3.2.4 The following statements hold. (1) X is trivial if and only if X is exact. (2) C is a cofibrant if and only if C 2 dgA~. (3) F is a fibrant if and only if F 2 dgB~ if and only if F has all the terms in B. logo Table of content Motivation and Introduction Main results Applications An abelian model structure Definition 3.2.3(M. Hovey 2002) Suppose that an abelian category A has a model structure and X 2 A, X is trivial if 0 ! X is a weak equivalence, X is cofibrant if 0 ! X is a cofibration and X is fibrant if X ! 0 is a fibration.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • COVERING THEORY for LINEAR CATEGORIES with APPLICATION to DERIVED CATEGORIES Introduction the Covering Technique Has Been Playin
    COVERING THEORY FOR LINEAR CATEGORIES WITH APPLICATION TO DERIVED CATEGORIES RAYMUNDO BAUTISTA AND SHIPING LIU Abstract. We extend the Galois covering theory introduced by Bongartz- Gabriel for skeletal linear categories to general linear categories. We show that a Galois covering between Krull-Schmidt categories preserves irreducible morphisms and almost splits sequences. Specializing to derived categories, we study when a Galois covering between locally bounded linear categories induces a Galois covering between the bounded derived categories of finite dimensional modules. As an application, we show that each locally bounded linear category with radical squared zero admits a gradable Galois covering, which induces a Galois covering between the bounded derived categories of finite dimensional modules, and a Galois covering between the Auslander-Reiten quivers of these bounded derived categories. In a future paper, this will enable us to obtain a complete description of the bounded derived category of finite dimensional modules over a finite dimensional algebra with radical squared zero. Introduction The covering technique has been playing an important role in the representation theory of finite dimensional algebras; see, for example, [6, 8, 9, 16]. In this connec- tion, algebras are regarded as locally bounded linear categories; see [6]. To each Galois covering between such categories, Bongartz-Gabriel associated a push-down functor between their module categories, which induces a Galois covering between the Auslander-Reiten quivers in the locally representation-finite case; see [6, 8]. This technique was extended later by Asashiba by studying the induced push-down functor between the bounded homotopy categories of finitely generated projective modules; see [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Infinity-Tilting Theory
    ∞-TILTING THEORY LEONID POSITSELSKI AND JAN SˇTOVˇ ´ICEKˇ Abstract. We define the notion of an infinitely generated tilting object of infi- nite homological dimension in an abelian category. A one-to-one correspondence between ∞-tilting objects in complete, cocomplete abelian categories with an injec- tive cogenerator and ∞-cotilting objects in complete, cocomplete abelian categories with a projective generator is constructed. We also introduce ∞-tilting pairs, con- sisting of an ∞-tilting object and its ∞-tilting class, and obtain a bijective corre- spondence between ∞-tilting and ∞-cotilting pairs. Finally, we discuss the related derived equivalences and t-structures. Contents Introduction 1 1. The Tilted and Cotilted Abelian Categories 4 2. ∞-Tilting-Cotilting Correspondence 7 3. ∞-Tilting and ∞-Cotilting Pairs 13 4. ∞-Tilting-Cotilting Derived Equivalences 17 5. ∞-Tilting and ∞-Cotilting t-Structures 20 6. Examples 25 References 32 Introduction The phrase ‘tilting theory’ is often used to refer to a well-developed general ma- chinery for producing equivalences between triangulated categories (see [3] for an introduction, history and applications). Such equivalences are often represented by a arXiv:1711.06169v3 [math.CT] 13 Aug 2019 distinguished object, a so-called tilting object, and it is crucial to most of the theory that such a tilting object is homologically small. If A is an abelian category with exact coproducts (e.g. a category of modules over a ring or sheaves on a topological space) and T is a tilting object, the smallness typically translates at least to the assumptions that T is finitely generated and of finite projective dimension. In this paper we introduce and systematically develop ∞-tilting theory, where all homological smallness assumptions are dropped.
    [Show full text]
  • I. Overview of Activities, April, 2005-March, 2006 …
    MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES RESEARCH INSTITUTE ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2005-2006 I. Overview of Activities, April, 2005-March, 2006 …......……………………. 2 Innovations ………………………………………………………..... 2 Scientific Highlights …..…………………………………………… 4 MSRI Experiences ….……………………………………………… 6 II. Programs …………………………………………………………………….. 13 III. Workshops ……………………………………………………………………. 17 IV. Postdoctoral Fellows …………………………………………………………. 19 Papers by Postdoctoral Fellows …………………………………… 21 V. Mathematics Education and Awareness …...………………………………. 23 VI. Industrial Participation ...…………………………………………………… 26 VII. Future Programs …………………………………………………………….. 28 VIII. Collaborations ………………………………………………………………… 30 IX. Papers Reported by Members ………………………………………………. 35 X. Appendix - Final Reports ……………………………………………………. 45 Programs Workshops Summer Graduate Workshops MSRI Network Conferences MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES RESEARCH INSTITUTE ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2005-2006 I. Overview of Activities, April, 2005-March, 2006 This annual report covers MSRI projects and activities that have been concluded since the submission of the last report in May, 2005. This includes the Spring, 2005 semester programs, the 2005 summer graduate workshops, the Fall, 2005 programs and the January and February workshops of Spring, 2006. This report does not contain fiscal or demographic data. Those data will be submitted in the Fall, 2006 final report covering the completed fiscal 2006 year, based on audited financial reports. This report begins with a discussion of MSRI innovations undertaken this year, followed by highlights
    [Show full text]
  • TILTING up ITERATED TILTED ALGEBRAS 1. Introduction Throughout This Paper, We Let K Denote a Fixed Algebraically Closed Field. B
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 128, Number 8, Pages 2223{2232 S 0002-9939(99)05230-2 Article electronically published on November 29, 1999 TILTING UP ITERATED TILTED ALGEBRAS IBRAHIM ASSEM, DIETER HAPPEL, AND SONIA TREPODE (Communicated by Ken Goodearl) Abstract. We show that, if A is a representation-finite iterated tilted algebra of euclidean type Q, then there exist a sequence of algebras A = A0;A1;A2;:::; (i) (i) Am, and a sequence of modules T ,where0≤ i<m,suchthateachT is Ai Ai (i) an APR-tilting Ai-module, or an APR-cotilting Ai-module, End T = Ai+1 Ai and Am is tilted representation-finite. 1. Introduction Throughout this paper, we let k denote a fixed algebraically closed field. By algebra is always meant a finite dimensional associative k-algebra with an identity, which we assume moreover to be basic and connected, and by module is meant a finitely generated right A-module. Tilting theory is by now an established tool in the representation theory of algebras. In particular, the classes of tilted and iterated tilted algebras, introduced by means of the tilting process, were very useful, for instance, in the classification of the self-injective algebras of polynomial growth (see [1], [7], [11]). We recall their definition. Let Q be a finite, connected quiver without oriented cycles and let kQ denote the path algebra of Q.AnalgebraA is said to be iterated tilted of type Q if there exists a going-up tilting series from A to kQ, that is, a sequence of algebras A = A0;A1;:::;Am = kQ and a sequence of tilting modules T (i),where0≤ i<m, such that End T (i) = A and each T (i) Ai Ai i+1 Ai is separating, that is, such that each indecomposable Ai-module M satisfies either (i) 1 (i) HomAi (T ;M)=0orExtAi (T ;M) = 0 (see [2]).
    [Show full text]
  • ALL TILTING MODULES ARE of FINITE TYPE 1. Introduction in The
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 135, Number 12, December 2007, Pages 3771–3781 S 0002-9939(07)08911-3 Article electronically published on August 30, 2007 ALL TILTING MODULES ARE OF FINITE TYPE SILVANA BAZZONI AND JAN SˇTOVˇ ´ICEKˇ (Communicated by Martin Lorenz) Abstract. We prove that any infinitely generated tilting module is of finite type, namely that its associated tilting class is the Ext-orthogonal of a set of modules possessing a projective resolution consisting of finitely generated projective modules. 1. Introduction In the early eighties Brenner and Butler in [9] and Happel and Ringel in [18] gen- eralized the classical Morita equivalence induced by a progenerator by introducing the notion of a tilting module over a finite-dimensional Artin algebra. In order to obtain equivalences between subcategories of the module category, tilting modules were assumed to be finitely generated and moreover of projective dimension at most one. Later, Miyashita [20] considered tilting modules of finite projective dimension and studied the equivalences induced by them. Colby and Fuller in [10] extended the setting to arbitrary rings, but in all the above-mentioned papers the tilting modules were always assumed to be finitely generated. The notion of infinitely generated tilting modules over arbitrary rings was introduced by Colpi and Trlifaj in [11] for the one-dimensional case and by Angeleri-H¨ugel and Coelho in [1] in the general case of finite projective dimension. One of the advantages in dealing with infinitely generated tilting modules is evident in connection with the good approximation theory that they induce and which we are going to illustrate (cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Τ-Tilting Theory – an Introduction
    τ-TILTING THEORY – AN INTRODUCTION HIPOLITO TREFFINGER 1. Introduction The term τ-tilting theory was coined by Adachi, Iyama and Reiten in [3] a paper having this title that first appeared in the arXiv in 2012 and that was published in 2014. In this paper, the authors combined with a fresh approach to the the study of two classical branches of representation theory of finite dimensional algebras, namely tilting theory and Auslander-Reiten theory. The combination of these two subjects is clearly reflected in the name of this novel theory, where the greek letter τ represents the Auslander-Reiten translation in the module category of an algebra while the reference to tilting theory is obvious. In these notes we give a small introduction to τ-tilting theory from the representation the- oretic perspective, making special emphasis in the close relation between τ-tilting theory and torsion theories. Clearly, this notes do not represent a complete survey on the topic since several important aspects of the theory are not covered in detail or even mentioned. For instance, in this notes we do not cover the explicit between τ-tilting theory with cluster theory, stability conditions, or exceptional sequences, just to name a few. These notes are organised as follows. In Section 2 we give a short historical account of the developments in representation theory that lead to the introduction of τ-tilting theory, hoping that this will help placing τ-tilting theory in the more general framework of representation theory. Then, in Section 3 we start giving the material that is covered in the lectures by giving the definition of our main objects of study: τ-rigid and τ-tilting modules and pairs.
    [Show full text]
  • K-Theory and Derived Equivalences
    K-THEORY AND DERIVED EQUIVALENCES DANIEL DUGGER AND BROOKE SHIPLEY Abstract. We show that if two rings have equivalent derived categories then they have the same algebraic K-theory. Similar results are given for G-theory, and for a large class of abelian categories. Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Model category preliminaries 4 3. K-theory and model categories 7 4. Tilting Theory 10 5. Proofs of the main results 12 6. Derived equivalence implies Quillen equivalence 14 7. Many-generators version of proofs 17 Appendix A. Proof of Proposition 3.7 20 References 22 1. Introduction Algebraic K-theory began as a collection of elaborate invariants for a ring R. Quillen was able to construct these in [Q2] by feeding the category of finitely- generated projective R-modules into the so-called Q-construction; this showed in particular that K-theory was a Morita invariant of the ring. The Q-construction could take as input any category with a sensible notion of exact sequence, and Waldhausen later generalized things even further. He realized that the same kind of invariants can be defined for a very broad class of homotopical situations (cf. [Wa], which used ‘categories with cofibrations and weak equivalences’). To define the algebraic K-theory of a ring using the Waldhausen approach, one takes as input the category of bounded chain complexes of finitely-generated projective modules. As soon as one understands this perspective it becomes natural to ask whether the Waldhausen K-theory really depends on the whole input category or just on the associated homotopy category, where the weak equivalences have been inverted.
    [Show full text]
  • Τ-Tilting Theory, Which ‘Completes’ (Classical) Tilting Theory from the Viewpoint of Mutation
    COMPOSITIO MATHEMATICA τ -tilting theory Takahide Adachi, Osamu Iyama and Idun Reiten Compositio Math. 150 (2014), 415{452 doi:10.1112/S0010437X13007422 FOUNDATION COMPOSITIO MATHEMATICA Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.35.229, on 25 Sep 2021 at 16:00:33, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1112/S0010437X13007422 Compositio Math. 150 (2014) 415{452 doi:10.1112/S0010437X13007422 τ -tilting theory Takahide Adachi, Osamu Iyama and Idun Reiten Dedicated to the memory of Dieter Happel Abstract The aim of this paper is to introduce τ-tilting theory, which `completes' (classical) tilting theory from the viewpoint of mutation. It is well known in tilting theory that an almost complete tilting module for any finite-dimensional algebra over a field k is a direct summand of exactly one or two tilting modules. An important property in cluster- tilting theory is that an almost complete cluster-tilting object in a 2-CY triangulated category is a direct summand of exactly two cluster-tilting objects. Reformulated for path algebras kQ, this says that an almost complete support tilting module has exactly two complements. We generalize (support) tilting modules to what we call (support) τ-tilting modules, and show that an almost complete support τ-tilting module has exactly two complements for any finite-dimensional algebra. For a finite-dimensional k-algebra Λ, we establish bijections between functorially finite torsion classes in mod Λ, support τ-tilting modules and two-term silting complexes in Kb(proj Λ).
    [Show full text]
  • Tilting Theory
    Introduction to τ-tilting theory Osamu Iyamaa and Idun Reitenb,1 aGraduate School of Mathematics, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8602, Japan; and bDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway Edited by Bernard Leclerc, University of Caen, Caen, France, and accepted by the Editorial Board January 22, 2014 (received for review September 17, 2013) From the viewpoint of mutation, we will give a brief survey of when dealing with categorification of cluster algebras. For cluster tilting theory and cluster-tilting theory together with a motivation categories (10), and more generally, for 2-Calabi–Yau trian- from cluster algebras. Then we will give an introduction to τ-tilting gulated categories (11), a class of objects called cluster-tilting theory which was recently developed. objects have the desired property (Theorem 9). For path algebras kQ, this result for cluster categories was translated to the fact 1. Introduction that the same holds for support tilting pairs (which generalize Let Λ be a finite dimensional algebra over an algebraically closed tilting modules) (12, 13) (Theorem 7). More generally, for field k, for example k is the field of complex numbers. We always 2-Calabi–Yau triangulated categories we can translate to the assume that Λ is associative and has an identity. An important property that for the associated 2-Calabi–Yau tilted algebras class of algebras is the path algebras kQ for a finite quiver Q, that the support τ-tilting pairs have the desired property for is, a finite-directed graph. The k-basis for kQ is the paths in Q.
    [Show full text]
  • Title INTRODUCTION to CLUSTER TILTING in 2-CALABI- YAU
    INTRODUCTION TO CLUSTER TILTING IN 2-CALABI- Title YAU CATEGORIES (Expansion of Combinatorial Representation Theory) Author(s) IYAMA, OSAMU Citation 数理解析研究所講究録 (2009), 1647: 49-59 Issue Date 2009-05 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2433/140703 Right Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Textversion publisher Kyoto University 数理解析研究所講究録 第 1647 巻 2009 年 49-59 49 INTRODUCTION TO CLUSTER TILTING IN 2-CALABI-YAU CATEGORIES OSAMU IYAMA ABSTRACT. Cluster tilting theory reveals combinatorial structure of 2-Calabi-Yau triangulated cate- gories and is applied to categorIfy Fomln-Zelevinsky cluster algebras by many authors (Buan, Marsh, Reineke, Reiten Todorov, Caldero, Chapoton, Schiffler, Keller,...). In the flrst section, we will introduce cluster tilting theory in 2-Calabi-Yau triangulated category. In particular, a combinatorial description of change of endomorphism algebras of cluster tilting objects via mutation process is given in terms of Fomin-Zelevinsky quiver mutation rule. In the second section, a class of examples of 2-Calabi-Yau triangulated categories containing cluster tilting objects will be constructed from preprojective algebras and elements in the corresponding Coxeter groups. In recent years, cluster tilting theory becomes amajor subject in representation theory of associative algebras. It has the following three aspects: (1) Categorification of combinatorics of Fomin-Zelevinsky cluster algebras [FZ2], (2) Calabi-Yau analogue of claesical tilting theory, (3) Three dimensIonal Auslander-Reiten theory. The sspect (2) with its application to (1) turns out to be so fruitful that there are alot of applications outside of representation theory. Among others, Zamolodchikov’s periodicity conjecture on $Y$-systems and $T$-systems associated to pairs of Dynkin diagrams is solved by Keller [Ke3] and $Inouearrow I.$-Kuniba- Nakanishi-Suzuki $[$ IIKNS].
    [Show full text]
  • Results from Mathscinet: Mathematical Reviews on the Web Cg Copyright American Mathematical Society 2018 Tilted and Hochschild E
    Results from MathSciNet: Mathematical Reviews on the Web c Copyright American Mathematical Society 2018 MR3585514 16-01 13E10 15A69 16Dxx 16E30 16Gxx 16K20 16T05 Skowro´nski,Andrzej (PL-TORNM); Yamagata, Kunio (J-TAGT2) FFrobenius algebras. II. Tilted and Hochschild extension algebras. EMS Textbooks in Mathematics. European Mathematical Society (EMS), Z¨urich, 2017. x+619 pp. ISBN 978-3-03719-174-3 The book under review is the second of three volumes devoted to the modern repre- sentation theory of finite-dimensional associative algebras, and, in particular, to the representation theory of Frobenius algebras. It is a natural continuation of the first vol- ume [A. Skowro´nskiand K. Yamagata, Frobenius algebras. I, EMS Textbk. Math., Eur. Math. Soc., Z¨urich, 2011; MR2894798]. The aim of the second volume is to provide a comprehensive introduction to the representation theory of hereditary algebras, tilted algebras, Hochschild extension algebras, and especially to the shape of their Auslander- Reiten quivers. The third volume will be more advanced and will discuss Frobenius algebras as orbit algebras of repetitive categories of finite-dimensional associative alge- bras with respect to actions of certain admissible automorphism groups. In particular, in the third volume covering techniques will be explained which can be used to reduce the representation theory of Frobenius algebras to the representation theory of alge- bras of small global dimension and then to apply tilting theory. Similarly to the first volume, the second volume is primarily addressed to graduate students as well as to non-specialists. It is again self-contained|the only prerequisites are a basic knowledge of linear algebra and some results of the first volume.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Τ-Tilting Theory
    Introduction to τ-tilting theory Osamu Iyama ∗, Idun Reiten † ∗Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan, and †NTNU, Trondheim, Norway Submitted to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America From the viewpoint of mutation, we will give a brief survey of tilt- To make mutation always possible, it is desirable to en- ing theory and cluster-tilting theory together with a motivation from large our class of tilting modules in order to get the more cluster algebras. Then we will give an introdution to τ-tilting theory regular property that almost complete ones always have two which was recently developed in [AIR]. complements. This is accomplished by introducing τ-tilting modules, or more precisely, support τ-tilting pairs [AIR]. Such tilting | silting | τ -tilting | cluster-tilting | mutation | cluster algebra a property is of central interest when dealing with categori- fication of cluster algebras. For cluster categories [BMRRT], and more generally, for 2-Calabi-Yau triangulated categories 1. Introduction [IY], a class of objects called cluster-tilting objects have the de- Let Λ be a finite dimensional algebra over an algebraically sired property (Theorem 9). For path algebras kQ, this result closed field k, for example k is the field of complex numbers. for cluster categories was translated to the fact that the same We always assume that Λ is associative and has an identity. holds for support tilting pairs (which generalize tilting mod- An important class of algebras is the path algebras kQ for a ules) [IT, Rin3] (Theorem 7). More generally, for 2-Calabi- finite quiver Q, that is, a finite directed graph.
    [Show full text]