DOCSLIB.ORG

Predator Response Te Rongoā

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Predator Response Te Rongoā PREDATOR RESPONSE TE RONGOĀ Protecting taonga species Te tautiaki i ngā momo taonga koiora 2021 THE PROBLEM – TE RARURARU The native wildlife of Aotearoa and the places they live are taonga (treasures). We need to protect them. Twenty-five million native birds are killed increase when they are not controlled. each year by possums, stoats, rats and DOC must continue its long-term predator other predators.1 control programme to prevent the decline of native species. Tiakina Ngā Manu is the Department of Conservation’s (DOC) national programme With the removal of the pressure to to protect threatened native species from respond to mast conditions, DOC is able predators on public conservation land. to return to sites nationally to protect It is part of the national Predator Free taonga species and their habitats. 2050 movement. Overall, we aim to reduce predators in approximately 500,000 ha of public No beech mast or heavy seeding is conservation land to give native species predicted for 2020/2021, however, rat, a chance to breed. stoat and possum numbers continue to Predator SUMMER plague cycle When forest trees flower heavily, a lot of seed is produced AUTUMN When seed is abundant, the rodent population increases rapidly WINTER Stoats feed on abundant rodents SUMMER ONWARDS SPRING Stoat numbers explode When the seed rots or germinates, and they also turn plagues of starving rats turn to bird to birds for food eggs and nestlings 1John Innes, Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research. Treasure for the future Hei taonga mā ngā whakatupuranga A fundamental part of DOC’s long-term approach is to work closely with iwi, hapū and whānau. Iwi-led initiatives to improve the health of the ngahere (forests), including predator control on lands over which they are kaitiaki (guardians), are also supported by DOC. Pekapeka-tou-poto / short-tailed bat Threat status: Northern: In serious trouble Central: In some trouble Southern: In some trouble Population: More than 10,000 Distribution: North Island: Restricted to two isolated populations in northern North Island and patchy across central North Island. Restricted to Fiordland and Codfish Island /Whenua Hou in the South Island. % 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 With predator control national Without predator control national increase of 9% annually decrease of 5% annually Bat on ground among dactylanthus buds. Photo: David Mudge RESPONSE – TE RONGOĀ Controlling predators The Department of Conservation uses a range of pest-control tools to suit particular needs. Trapping and other ground-based predator control methods play an important part in ongoing control in accessible areas, but cannot be easily scaled up to respond rapidly to immediate pest threats. Biodegradable 1080 is applied by air over large areas or rugged terrain to suppress rats, stoats and possums. Ground control Conventional and self-resetting traps and bait stations are used for longer term and localised suppression of predator populations in accessible areas. Conventional traps Bait stations Self-resetting traps Aerial 1080 1080 is biodegradable, breaks down quickly in the 4–6 baits are dropped environment and does not in an area the size of a leave permanent residues in tennis court. water, soil, plants or animals. Without the need to The active component occurs respond to a mast this naturally in many plants in year, Tiakina Ngā Manu Australia, South America and is focused on protecting Africa as a defence against vulnerable sites and browsing animals. species across the country. North Island kōkako Threat status: In some trouble Population: 2000 pairs Distribution: North Island native forests sporadic predator control regular predator control 100 pairs 300 pairs 2000 pairs 1989 1999 2020 More than 600 kiwi have been monitored during aerial 1080 operations since 1990. Not one kiwi has died as a result of 1080. Photo: Rod Morris DELIVERY – TE WHAKATINANA Taonga species under threat The highlighted areas are home to some of Aotearoa New Zealand's most vulnerable native species. These species and their kōkako habitats need protection pekapeka/bat kiwi from introduced predators. snail whio/blue duck kiwi pekapeka/bat titipounamu/rifleman kākā Indicative areas of species under most threat National park kākā whio/blue duck Conservation park kiwi Other public conservation land pekapeka/bat toutouwai/robin snail pīwauwau/rock wren kākāriki karaka/orange-fronted parakeet whio/blue duck kiwi kākā toutouwai/robin titipounamu/rifleman kea pōpokotea/whitehead kākā kea mohua/yellowhead pīwauwau/rock wren kākā kiwi tūturiwhatu/ whio/blue duck southern NZ dotterel Whio Kākā Photo: Herb Christophers Photo: Herb Christophers Status In serious trouble Status: North Island: In some trouble South Island: In serious trouble Population: Breeding population unlikely to be more than 1000 pairs Population: >10,000 Distribution: Forested headwater catchments Distribution: Large forested areas in the along the ranges of both islands. North and South Islands. Kea Brown kiwi Photo: Sabine Bernert Photo: Rod Morris Status: In serious trouble Status: In serious trouble Population: 3000–5000 Population: Approximately 25,000 Distribution: Alpine and forested environments of Distribution: Lowland and coastal native forest and the South Island. subalpine areas of the North Island. Powelliphanta snails Tūturiwhatu/southern NZ dotterel Photo: Kath Walker Photo: James Reardon Status: In serious trouble Status: In serious trouble Population: Declining Population: 173 individuals Distribution: Widely but sparsely spread Distribution: Remnant breeding population on throughout western South Island Rakiura/Stewart Island. and lower North Island. OUTCOME – TUKUNGA IHO Long-term monitoring An example: doubling native bird numbers in the Landsborough valley For 23 years, our ‘bird counters’ have researched how bird life in the South Westland’s remote Landsborough valley responds to sustained predator control. The results of this painstaking work show This outcome shows that where we protect that native bird numbers have more than taonga species against possums, rats and doubled since predator control began. stoats over whole valleys and forests, we Seven of the 13 taonga species in the can turn their fortunes around. valley have increased and four remain This progress bodes well as we work stable. One of the most threatened birds, towards a predator free Aotearoa the mohua/yellowhead, has gone from New Zealand. 14 birds in the survey area to 485 birds at the last count in November 2020. Mohua/yellowhead. Photo: Leon Berard Titipounamu/rifleman. Photo: DOC Miromiro/tomtit. Photo: Brent Beaven For more information on DOC’s planning for predator control This publication is produced using this year, visit www.doc.govt.nz/tiakina-nga-manu paper sourced from well-managed, renewable and legally logged forests. For more information on Predator Free 2050: www.doc.govt.nz/pf2050 Front cover: Pekapeka-tou-poto/short-tailed bat. Photo: David Mudge Published by: Department of Conservation, PO Box 10420, Wellington 6143 Editing and design: Creative Services, Department of Conservation March 2021 R196077.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • New Zealand Comprehensive II Trip Report 31St October to 16Th November 2016 (17 Days)
    New Zealand Comprehensive II Trip Report 31st October to 16th November 2016 (17 days) The Critically Endangered South Island Takahe by Erik Forsyth Trip report compiled by Tour Leader: Erik Forsyth RBL New Zealand – Comprehensive II Trip Report 2016 2 Tour Summary New Zealand is a must for the serious seabird enthusiast. Not only will you see a variety of albatross, petrels and shearwaters, there are multiple- chances of getting out on the high seas and finding something unusual. Seabirds dominate this tour and views of most birds are alongside the boat. There are also several land birds which are unique to these islands: kiwis - terrestrial nocturnal inhabitants, the huge swamp hen-like Takahe - prehistoric in its looks and movements, and wattlebirds, the saddlebacks and Kokako - poor flyers with short wings Salvin’s Albatross by Erik Forsyth which bound along the branches and on the ground. On this tour we had so many highlights, including close encounters with North Island, South Island and Little Spotted Kiwi, Wandering, Northern and Southern Royal, Black-browed, Shy, Salvin’s and Chatham Albatrosses, Mottled and Black Petrels, Buller’s and Hutton’s Shearwater and South Island Takahe, North Island Kokako, the tiny Rifleman and the very cute New Zealand (South Island wren) Rockwren. With a few members of the group already at the hotel (the afternoon before the tour started), we jumped into our van and drove to the nearby Puketutu Island. Here we had a good introduction to New Zealand birding. Arriving at a bay, the canals were teeming with Black Swans, Australasian Shovelers, Mallard and several White-faced Herons.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Play in Kaka (Nestor Meridionalis) with Comparisons to Kea (Nestor Notabilis)
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Papers in Behavior and Biological Sciences Papers in the Biological Sciences 2004 Social Play in Kaka (Nestor meridionalis) with Comparisons to Kea (Nestor notabilis) Judy Diamond University of Nebraska - Lincoln, [email protected] Alan B. Bond University of Nebraska - Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/bioscibehavior Part of the Behavior and Ethology Commons Diamond, Judy and Bond, Alan B., "Social Play in Kaka (Nestor meridionalis) with Comparisons to Kea (Nestor notabilis)" (2004). Papers in Behavior and Biological Sciences. 34. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/bioscibehavior/34 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Papers in the Biological Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Papers in Behavior and Biological Sciences by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Published in Behaviour 141 (2004), pp. 777-798. Copyright © 2004 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden. Used by permission. Social Play in Kaka (Nestor meridionalis) with Comparisons to Kea (Nestor notabilis) Judy Diamond University of Nebraska State Museum, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA Alan B. Bond School of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA Corresponding author—J. Diamond, [email protected] Summary Social play in the kaka (Nestor meridionalis), a New Zealand parrot, is described and contrasted with that of its closest relative, the kea (Nestor notabilis), in one of the first comparative studies of social play in closely related birds. Most play ac- tion patterns were clearly homologous in these two species, though some con- trasts in the form of specific play behaviors, such as kicking or biting, could be attributed to morphological differences.
    [Show full text]
  • WINNER IS … 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 1 by Iona Mcnaughton the Winners So Far the Bird of the Year Competition Was Started As A
    AND THE WINNER IS … 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 1 by Iona McNaughton The Winners So Far The Bird of the Year competition was started as a way of making people more interested in native 2005: Tūī 2010 New Zealand birds. Many of our native birds are 2006: Pīwakawaka – Fantail endangered, so if people know more about them, 2007: Riroriro – Grey warbler they can help to keep the birds safe. 2008: Kākāpō New Zealand native birds are given a “danger status”. 2009: Kiwi 2011 This shows how much danger they are in of becoming 2010: Kākāriki karaka – Orange-fronted parakeet extinct. The birds are either “doing OK”, “in some 2011: Pūkeko trouble”, or “in serious trouble”. Sadly, only about 2012: Kārearea – New Zealand falcon 20 percent of New Zealand native birds are 2013: Mohua – Yellowhead “doing OK”. 2014: Tara iti – Fairy tern 2012 Danger status This article has 2015: Kuaka – Bar-tailed godwit information about 2016: Kōkako some of the birds Kea In some Doing 2017: of the year – including trouble OK 2018: Kererū – New Zealand pigeon their danger status. 2013 In serious trouble 10 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 Bird of the Year 2006: Pīwakawaka – Fantail Bird of the Year 2005: Tūī Danger status Doing OK Danger status Doing OK Description Endemic Small body with a long tail that it can Description Endemic spread out like a fan A large bird (up to 32 centimetres long) About 16 centimetres long with shiny green-black feathers and a tu of white throat feathers What it eats Insects What it eats Insects.
    [Show full text]
  • SHORT NOTE a Holocene Fossil South Island Takahē
    34 Notornis, 2019, Vol. 66: 34-36 0029-4470 © The Ornithological Society of New Zealand Inc. SHORT NOTE A Holocene fossil South Island takahē (Porphyrio hochstetteri) in a high-altitude north-west Nelson cave ALEXANDER P. BOAST School of Environment, University of Auckland, New Zealand Long-Term Ecology Laboratory, Manaaki Whenua-Landcare Research, 54 Gerald Street, Lincoln 7608, New Zealand South Island takahē (Porphyrio hochstetteri) is one of to the alpine zone (Beauchamp & Worthy 1988; New Zealand’s most critically endangered endemic Worthy & Holdaway 2002). A related species, the bird species (NZ threat classification system A (1/1), North Island takahē or “moho” (P. mantelli) became “nationally vulnerable”) (Robertson et al. 2017). extinct before the 20th Century and is primarily Maori lore, and as few as 4 recorded sightings during known from fossils, although a live bird may have the 19th Century suggest that takahē occurred only been caught in 1894 (“takahē” in this article will in high Fiordland valleys and possibly the Nelson refer to P. hochstetteri only) (Phillipps 1959; Trewick region in recent history (Williams 1960; Reid 1974). 1996; Worthy & Holdaway 2002). It has been The birds were so infrequently seen that they were argued that takahē are a specialist tussock-feeding assumed extinct until a population of ~250–500 was “glacial-relict” species, and thus most lowland discovered in the Murchison Mountains, Fiordland, takahē subfossils date from the glacial period when in 1948 (Reid & Stack 1974). This population sharply grasslands and herbfields were more extensive declined until intensive conservation commenced (Mills et al. 1984). However, subsequent surveys of in 1981 (since fluctuating between ~100–180 birds) takahē subfossil data suggest that takahē occurred (Crouchley 1994).
    [Show full text]
  • Pb) Exposure in Populations of a Wild Parrot (Kea Nestor Notabilis
    56 AvailableNew on-lineZealand at: Journal http://www.newzealandecology.org/nzje/ of Ecology, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2012 Anthropogenic lead (Pb) exposure in populations of a wild parrot (kea Nestor notabilis) Clio Reid1, Kate McInnes1,*, Jennifer M. McLelland2 and Brett D. Gartrell2 1Research and Development Group, Department of Conservation, PO Box 10420, Wellington 6143, New Zealand 2New Zealand Wildlife Health Centre, Institute of Veterinary, Animal and Biomedical Sciences, Massey University, Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand *Author for correspondence (Email: [email protected]) Published on-line: 9 December 2011 Abstract: Kea (Nestor notabilis), large parrots endemic to hill country areas of the South Island, New Zealand, are subject to anthropogenic lead (Pb) exposure in their environment. Between April 2006 and June 2009 kea were captured in various parts of their range and samples of their blood were taken for blood lead analysis. All kea (n = 88) had been exposed to lead, with a range in blood lead concentrations of 0.014 – 16.55 μmol L–1 (mean ± SE, 1.11 ± 0.220 μmol L–1). A retrospective analysis of necropsy reports from 30 kea was also carried out. Of these, tissue lead levels were available for 20 birds, and 11 of those had liver and/or kidney lead levels reported to cause lead poisoning in other avian species. Blood lead levels for kea sampled in populated areas (with permanent human settlements) were significantly higher (P < 0.001) than those in remote areas. Sixty-four percent of kea sampled in populated areas had elevated blood lead levels (> 0.97 μmol L–1, the level suggestive of lead poisoning in parrots), and 22% had levels > 1.93 μmol L–1 – the level diagnostic of lead poisoning in parrots.
    [Show full text]
  • Kea-Kaka Population Viability Assessment ·-~~;;.-.,;,,~
    KEA-KAKA POPULATION VIABILITY ASSESSMENT ·-~~;;.-.,;,,~ The work of the Captive Breeding Specialist Group is made possible by generous contributions from the following members of the CBSG rnstitutional Conservation Council: Conservators ($10,000 and above) Cologne Zoo Stewards ($500-$999) Sponsors ($50-$249) Anheuser-Busch Corporation El Paso Zoo Aalborg Zoo African Safari Australian Species Management Program Federation of Zoological Gardens of Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum Apenheul 7..oo. Chicago Zoological Society Great Britain and Ireland BanhamZoo Belize Zoo Columbus Zoological Gardens Fort Wayne Zoological Society Copenhagen Zoo Claws 'n Paws Denver Zoological Gardens Gladys Porter Zoo Cotswold Wildlife Park Darmstadt Zoo Fossil Rim Wildlife Center Indianapolis Zoological Society Dutch Federation of Zoological Gardens Dreher Park Zoo Friends of Zoo Atlanta Japanese Association of Zoological Parks Erie Zoological Park Fota Wildlife Park Greater Los Angeles Zoo Association and Aquariums Fota Wildlife Park Great Plains Zoo International Union of Directors of Jersey Wildlife Preservation Trust Givskud Zoo Hancock House Publisher Zoological Gardens Lincoln Park Zoo Granby Zoological Society Kew Royal Botanic Gardens Lubee Foundation The living Desert Knoxville Zoo Nagoya Aquarium Metropolitan Toronto Zoo Marwell Zoological Park National Geographic Magazine National Audubon Society-Research Minnesota Zoological Garden Milwaukee County Zoo National Zoological Parks Board Ranch Sanctuary New York Zoological Society NOAHS Center of South
    [Show full text]
  • The Wrybill Canterbury Regional Newsletter BIRDS NEW ZEALAND Te Kahui Matai Manu O Aotearoa
    The Wrybill Canterbury Regional Newsletter BIRDS NEW ZEALAND Te Kahui Matai Manu o Aotearoa February 2020 What's on at Birds NZ Canterbury: February to April 2020 Field Trips Tuesday March 10-Lincoln Wetlands and stormwater ponds. Meet at 9:30am in the car February 15- We'll be lending our eyes and park on Ellesmere Road. expertise to the annual Te Waihora/Lake Ellesmere Bird Count organised by the Waihora Wednesday April 15- Christchurch Botanic Ellesmere Trust. To find out more or to register Gardens. Meet at 9:30am at the bridge by contact Denise Ford Armagh St car park (near Victoria Lake). ([email protected]). Please contact Bev ([email protected] or 027 March 22 -Washpen Falls. This is a 2-3 hour 3184 713) if you intend to come on any rambles. loop track on a working high country farm. Moderate fitness is required. It is meant to be Bev has alternated the days of these trips to try filled with native bush and bird life - not to and suit members' needs. If you would like to mention a waterfall. Since this track is on come but these days don't suit you, please let private property there is a cost of $10 per Bev know so she can take this into account when person which includes the use of walking sticks organizing future rambles. and a track guide. We may also make other atlassing stops in the area. Contact Sandra ([email protected] or 358 5706) by 15 March if you would like to attend.
    [Show full text]
  • 1080 Use in Aotearoa New Zealand 2018
    1080 use in Aotearoa New Zealand 2018 An annual report on the aerial operations, research, and incidents relating to 1080 use. 1080 1080 use in Aotearoa New Zealand 2018 An annual report on the aerial operations, research, and incidents relating to 1080 use. Contents Executive summary 5 Background 7 Aerial pest control operations in 2018 8 How aerial 1080 is used for pest control 8 Commissioning organisations in 2018 9 Operators that applied 1080 aerially in 2018 10 Mandatory reports after each aerial 1080 operation 10 Rules for 1080 formulations and application rates 11 Location of operations 11 Size of operations 14 Protecting public health 15 Agencies with delegated power for 1080 permissions 15 Management of water intakes ensures public health is protected 15 Monitoring provides assurance that water supplies remain safe 16 Conclusion 16 Communication 17 Consultation with Māori 17 Consultation with hunting groups 17 Changes to operations as a result of consultation 17 Assessing applications against the guideline 18 Outcomes of 1080 aerial operations 19 Benefits for TB eradication 19 Benefits for native species 19 A long-term approach 19 Pest numbers before and after operations 20 Overall assessment of the outcome of the operations 20 1080 use in Aotearoa New Zealand 2018 | 3 Research into 1080 21 More research needed on 1080 and alternatives 21 Research in 2018 22 Manufacturers’ research projects in 2018 31 Research projects since 2007 32 Alternatives to the use of 1080 32 Optimising the use of 1080 38 Other related research 45 Incidents and matters of public concern 49 Incident summaries 50 References 57 1080 use in Aotearoa New Zealand 2018 | 4 Executive summary This 12th annual report is to inform people on Operators who want to use 1080 must follow the the aerial use of sodium fluoracetate (1080) controls set out under the HSNO Act and the formulated baits in Aotearoa New Zealand.
    [Show full text]
  • Kea (Nestor Notabilis) Care Manual
    Kea (Nestor notabilis) CARE MANUAL CREATED BY THE AZA Kea Species Survival Plan® Program IN ASSOCIATION WITH THE AZA Parrot Taxon Advisory Group Kea (Nestor notabilis) Care Manual Kea (Nestor notabilis) Care Manual Published by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums in collaboration with the AZA Animal Welfare Committee Formal Citation: AZA Kea Species Survival Plan (Nestor notabilis). (2020). Kea Care Manual. Silver Spring, MD: Association of Zoos and Aquariums. Original Completion Date: July 1, 2019 Kea (Nestor notabilis) Care Manual Coordinator: Kimberly Klosterman, Cincinnati Zoo & Botanical Garden, Senior Avian Keeper, Kea SSP Vice Coordinator Authors and Significant Contributors: Krista Adlehart CRM, Woodland Park Zoo, Animal Management Registrar Amanda Ardente NVM, PhD, Walt Disney World, University of Florida, Nutrition Fellow Jackie Bray, MA Zoology CPBT-KA, Raptor Incorporated, Associate Director Cassandre Crawford MM, Northwest Local School District, Orchestra Director, Kea SSP Volunteer Thea Etchells, Denver Zoo, Bird Keeper Linda Henry, Board Member of Zoological Lighting Institute, SeaWorld San Diego Phillip Horvey, Sedgwick County Zoo, Senior Zookeeper, Masked Lapwing SSP Coordinator and Studbook Keeper Cari Inserra, San Diego Zoo, Lead Animal Trainer Kimberly Klosterman, Cincinnati Zoo & Botanical Garden, Senior Avian Keeper, Kea Care Manual Coordinator, Vice Coordinator Kea SSP Program Jessica Meehan, Denver Zoo, Bird Keeper, Kea SSP Coordinator and Studbook Keeper Jennifer Nollman DVM, Cincinnati Zoo & Botanical Garden, Associate Veterinarian Catherine Vine, Philadelphia Zoo, Avian Keeper Reviewers: Raoul Schwing PhD, Head of Kea Lab & Infrastructure Project Manager, Messerli Research Institute, University of Vienna, AU Tamsin Orr-Walker, BAAT, Co-founder, Trustee & Chair of Kea Conservation Trust, South Island Community Engagement Coordinator, NZ Nigel Simpson, EAZA Kea EEP Coordinator, Head of Operations, Wild Place Project, Bristol Zoological Society, UK Dr.rer.nat Gyula K.
    [Show full text]
  • Kākāpō Recovery EDUCATION RESOURCE
    Kākāpō Recovery EDUCATION RESOURCE A national partner of the Kākāpō Recovery Programme Cover photo: Alastair Morrison. This page: Mike Bodie. Published by: Department of Conservation Tāmaki Makaurau/Auckland Office Private Bag 68908 Newton Auckland 1145 June 2018 ISBN 978-1-98-851424-6 (online) R111265 A national partner of the Kākāpō Recovery Programme CONTENTS Introduction 3 What is a kākāpō? 5 Kākāpō habitat 6 Kākāpō superpowers! ‘Special features’/adaptations 9 The kākāpō life cycle 11 Threats to kākāpō – introduced predators 14 How people are helping kākāpō 14 Kākāpō population 17 Let’s help kākāpō! 19 Young kākāpō. Photo: Dianne Mason KĀKĀPŌ RECOVERY EDUCATION RESOURCE INTRODUCTION Why are birds important? Birds are an important part of our ecosystems and communities. They rely on trees, plants and other animals for food, shelter and their basic needs. An incredible range of birds is found in New Zealand: from large, flightless, ground-dwelling birds like the kākāpō and kiwi, to tiny, delicate songbirds like the grey warbler/ riroriro. Both endemic and native birds are an important part of balanced, healthy ecosystems. They pollinate plants and disperse their seeds, spread nutrients, and keep populations of insects and other living things stable. In Te Ao Māori, endemic and native birds enhance the mauri (life force/vitality) of an area and are part of whakapapa links (connections and ancestry). For more information, classroom activities and outdoor investigations about birds that can be found in your school grounds, backyard and local park or reserve, check out the ‘Experiencing birds in your green space’ resource – www.doc.govt.nz/education-experiencingbirds.
    [Show full text]
  • Pūkorokoro Miranda News Our Intrepid Pathfinder
    Pūkorokoro Miranda Journal of the PūkorokoroNews Miranda Naturalists’ Trust May 2019 Issue 112 Our intrepid pathfinder Eight days to Japan Now for the Arctic Two world premiers and one world Pūkorokoro Miranda Newsrecord | Issue 112 launch the Year of the Wrybill1 THREE PATHFINDERS: (from left) The publicity-hungry Wee Jimmy, who turned up whenever a camera appeared, pictured the day before he left; the cautious Amanda who was often seen but only at a distance; the shy JoJo who was rarely seen, snapped for once at Piako shortly before departure. Photos / Peter Freisen, Jim Eagles, Janie Vaughan Discovering where our Kuriri come from We may have caught only three of the desired 10 Pacific Golden Plover, or Kuriri, to fit with satellite tags but, writes project coordinator Jim Eagles, they have already answered a great many questions about the species. The email we had all been waiting for Japan. And the third – officially called Jim, It was, in fact, asking questions about arrived from Lee Tibbitts, wildlife biolo- though I prefer Wee Jimmy – left rather just that which started this whole project gist at the US Geological Survey’s Alaska late but seems to have made it to Guam. off. In the beginning, I had no intention Science Centre, at 12.48pm on Easter Hopefully, not long after you read this, of getting involved in a research project, I Saturday: ‘Amanda made it to Japan.’ an even more exciting email will arrived just wanted to write an article for PM News Amanda, one of three Pacific Golden saying that at least one of our birds has has about the Pacific Golden Plover.
    [Show full text]
  • Released Under the Official Information Act
    From: To: Subject: RE: Traps great risk to kea: advocate | Otago Daily Times Online News Date: Tuesday, 9 May 2017 10:22:00 a.m. Thanks for that, Technically what is saying regarding the potential risk to kea is correct, although I cannot comment on the ‘scale’ of the risk. However, I'm concerned about what the article suggests DOC has said: 1. the captive trials showed that kea could actually access the trigger on an A24 2. as far as I am aware, DOC is not doing the kea monitoring or continual trap improvement as stated in the article. Furthermore, a kaka was killed by an A24 in Boundary Stream, this would indicate that a kea would be able to trigger the trap if it so desired. Cheers Principal Scientist - Threats Conservation leadership for our nature Tākinā te hi tiākinā te hā, o te āo tūroā -----Original Message----- From: Sent: Tuesday, 9 May 2017 9:53 a.m. To: nz> Subject: Traps great risk to kea advocate | Otago Daily Times Online News Hi Released Under The Have you seenOfficial this - https://www.odt.co.nz/regions/wanaka/traps-great-risk-kea-advocate Information Act ? Its possible, even likely that young kea will be attracted to the traps and large numbers of them might be killed. Kea are inquisitive by nature and young kea particularly so. Its not unlikely that all the young kea in these valleys will be killed each year. Until we are confident that only a very small number of kea will be killed in these traps, we can’t afford to use them at sites where kea will be at risk.
    [Show full text]