Pemetrexed and Gemcitabine As Combination Therapy for the Treatment of Group3 Medulloblastoma

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pemetrexed and Gemcitabine As Combination Therapy for the Treatment of Group3 Medulloblastoma Cancer Cell Article Pemetrexed and Gemcitabine as Combination Therapy for the Treatment of Group3 Medulloblastoma Marie Morfouace,1 Anang Shelat,2 Megan Jacus,3 Burgess B. Freeman III,4 David Turner,3 Sarah Robinson,1 Frederique Zindy,1 Yong-Dong Wang,5 David Finkelstein,5 Olivier Ayrault,6 Laure Bihannic,6 Stephanie Puget,7 Xiao-Nan Li,8 James M. Olson,9 Giles W. Robinson,10 R. Kiplin Guy,2 Clinton F. Stewart,3 Amar Gajjar,10 and Martine F. Roussel1,* 1Department of Tumor Cell Biology 2Department of Chemical Biology and Therapeutics 3Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences 4Department of Preclinical Pharmacokinetics 5Department of Computational Biology St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA 6Institut Curie/CNRS UMR 3306/INSERM U1005 Building 110, Centre Universitaire, 91405 Orsay, Cedex, France 7AP-HP, Department of Neurosurgery, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, Universite´ Rene Descartes, 75015 Paris, France 8Department of Pediatrics, Section of Hematology-Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA 9Department of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA 10Department of NeuroOncology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA *Correspondence: [email protected] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2014.02.009 SUMMARY We devised a high-throughput, cell-based assay to identify compounds to treat Group3 medulloblastoma (G3 MB). Mouse G3 MBs neurospheres were screened against a library of approximately 7,000 compounds including US Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs. We found that pemetrexed and gemcitabine preferentially inhibited G3 MB proliferation in vitro compared to control neurospheres and substantially in- hibited G3 MB proliferation in vivo. When combined, these two drugs significantly increased survival of mice bearing cortical implants of mouse and human G3 MBs that overexpress MYC compared to each agent alone, while having little effect on mouse MBs of the sonic hedgehog subgroup. Our findings strongly suggest that combination therapy with pemetrexed and gemcitabine is a promising treatment for G3 MBs. INTRODUCTION patients with WNT MB tend to be older, female, and to uniformly survive with current therapy (Northcott et al., 2012). In contrast, Medulloblastoma (MB), a tumor of the posterior fossa, is primar- patients with G3 MB tend to be younger, male, have anaplastic ily a pediatric disease, although it occasionally occurs in adults histology, exhibit a higher incidence of metastatic disease, and (Ellison et al., 2011). MB is classified into four major subgroups have a poor prognosis (Dubuc et al., 2013; Kool et al., 2012; Par- based on clinical and molecular profiles (Taylor et al., 2012). sons et al., 2011; Pugh et al., 2012; Rausch et al., 2012; Robin- Two subgroups exhibit constitutive activation of the sonic son et al., 2012). One characteristic feature of G3 MB is their hedgehog (SHH) or wingless (WNT) developmental pathways. high MYC expression in >75% of cases. Indeed, one study The other two are referred to as group 3 (G3) and G4. Impor- shows that MYC expression is elevated in 20 of 26 (77%) G3 tantly, the molecular subgrouping of these tumors also relates MBs (named group C), compared to 1 of 35 (3%) G4 MBs (named to distinct patient demographics, histologic classification, so- group D; Northcott et al., 2011). Whole genome sequencing matic genetic variations, and clinical outcome. For example, studies on 17 G3 MBs reveals only one tumor (5.9%) with true Significance Despite the recent identification of four molecular groups of human MB, patients are currently treated with similar chemo- therapies independent of classification. G3 MB has a high incidence of metastasis and poor prognosis. Thus, more effective therapeutic approaches for these patients are desperately needed. The development of a mouse model of G3 MB enabled production of cultured neurospheres that provided an ideal platform to identify additional chemotherapies. We found two FDA-approved drugs that significantly inhibited mouse and human G3 MB neurosphere cultures, mouse allografts, and xenografts from G3 MB primary patient samples, but not mouse SHH MBs. These findings provide a strong rationale for combination therapy with pemetrexed and gemcitabine to treat patients with G3 MB. 516 Cancer Cell 25, 516–529, April 14, 2014 ª2014 Elsevier Inc. Cancer Cell Pemetrexed and Gemcitabine in G3 Medulloblastoma MYC amplification, whereas two other tumors display an aber- (10 mM) in triplicate. Z-prime and other assay diagnostics were rant copy number gain of the MYC gene. However, 15 of these acceptable (Figure S1C) and the scatterplot of controls and 17 (88%) G3 MBs demonstrate high MYC expression (Robinson compound activities showed adequate separation between et al., 2012). Despite these pronounced differences, patients signal and noise for both Myc1 and Trp53-null (Figure S1D, with MB are typically treated with uniform surgery, radiotherapy, left). Receiver operator characteristic analysis indicated that and adjuvant chemotherapy including vincristine, cisplatin, and the assay demonstrated acceptable discriminatory power be- cyclophosphamide (Packer et al., 2013) or lomustine and carbo- tween true-positive and true-negative results, with the area platin (Massimino et al., 2012). These therapies fail to cure one- under the curve (AUC) >0.8 for both lines, and that an assay cut- third of all patients and carry widespread morbidities that impair off of >50% returned 70% of all true-positive results for Myc1 survivor’s quality of life. (Figure S1D, right). A total of 690 of the 7,389 compounds, Molecular subgrouping has the potential to improve risk strat- including all with inhibition >50% in the primary screen with ification and tailor therapy to reduce toxicities to potential survi- Myc1, analogs of these hits, and other compounds of interest, vors. Paramount to this strategy is the development of accurate were tested in dose-response experiments in triplicate using models that recapitulate the subgroups for preclinical therapeu- concentrations ranging from 4 nM to 10 mM. Of the 690 hits, tic testing. We developed a mouse model of G3 MB through we identified 65 compounds with potency <1 mM against Myc the orthotopic transplantation of transgenic cerebellar granule 1(Figure 1; Table S1). neuronal progenitors (GNPs) in the cortices of naive recipient animals. GNPs were purified by percoll density gradient from Screening Results of FDA-Approved Drugs the cerebella of 5- to 7-day-old Trp53À/À;Cdkn2cÀ/À mice and To accelerate the transition of potential therapeutics into the infected with retroviruses encoding MYC (Kawauchi et al., clinic, we prioritized the FDA-approved drugs with oncology in- 2012). MB tumors develop within 30 days of transplantation dications and potencies below or near 1 mM for further study. with as few as 100 tumor cells that recapitulate the high level We conducted dose-response experiments on 35 FDA- of trimethylation of histone H3 at lysine 27 (H3K27me3) seen in approved drugs in triplicate on Myc1, Trp53-null, HepG2, and human G3 and G4 (Robinson et al., 2012). Tumors grow as neu- BJ cell lines (Figure S2A; Table 1). Drugs were grouped into rospheres that, when transplanted into cortices of recipient nine activity classes: folate pathway inhibitors, other inhibitors mice, induce secondary MBs that mimic the primary tumors of DNA/RNA synthesis, purine antimetabolites, microtubule in- (Kawauchi et al., 2012). Because neurospheres can be passaged hibitors, sterol biosynthesis inhibitors, topoisomerase inhibitors, repeatedly while maintaining their functional and molecular epigenetic regulators, proteasome inhibitors, and RNA polymer- properties, they provide a unique platform to conduct screens ase inhibitors. Myc1 was extremely sensitive to folate pathway of compounds to identify those with therapeutic potential against inhibitors with pemetrexed, methotrexate, and raltitrexed being human G3 MB. We here report the outcome of screening a the most selective. The DNA/RNA synthesis inhibitor gemcita- library of compounds that included US Food and Drug Adminis- bine was highly potent in both Myc1 and Trp53-null, but tration (FDA)-approved drugs and candidate compounds in achieved 100% efficacy in only Myc1. The purine antimetabolite development. cladribine showed promising activity against Myc1, but a nar- rower therapeutic window against the control cell lines HepG2 RESULTS and BJ compared to other drugs. The proteasome inhibitor bortezomib and the RNA polymerase inhibitor dactinomycin High-Throughput Screen Using Mouse G3 MB were equipotent and equally efficacious against both Myc1 Neurospheres and Trp53 null. Microtubule inhibitors, including vincristine and Tumor cells purified from several independently derived primary vinblastine, and topoisomerase inhibitors, such as doxorubicin, mouse G3 MBs were grown as neurospheres for four to five etoposide, and topotecan, were active in G3 MB. Because they passages providing lines with comparable cell proliferation char- are already used in the clinic for the treatment of MB, they were acteristics. Two lines, derived from independent tumors and not considered further. Cerivastatin and fluvastatin, two sterol infections, were hereafter referred to as ‘‘Myc1’’ and ‘‘Myc2.’’ biosynthesis inhibitors targeting 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl- Neurospheres from the cerebellum of 7-day-old (P7) Trp53À/À; coenzyme A reductase, had high efficacy but low potency rela- Cdkn2cÀ/À mice (hereafter
Recommended publications
  • Gy Total Body Irradiation Followed by Allogeneic Hematopoietic St
    Bone Marrow Transplantation (2009) 44, 785–792 & 2009 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0268-3369/09 $32.00 www.nature.com/bmt ORIGINAL ARTICLE Fludarabine, amsacrine, high-dose cytarabine and 12 Gy total body irradiation followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is effective in patients with relapsed or high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia F Zohren, A Czibere, I Bruns, R Fenk, T Schroeder, T Gra¨f, R Haas and G Kobbe Department of Haematology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology, Heinrich Heine-University, Du¨sseldorf, Germany In this prospective study, we examined the toxicity and Introduction efficacy of an intensified conditioning regimen for treatment of patients with relapsed or high-risk acute The use of intensified conventional induction chemothera- lymphoblastic leukemia who undergo allogeneic hemato- pies in the treatment of newly diagnosed ALL in adult poietic stem cell transplantation. Fifteen patients received patients has led to initial CR rates of up to 90%. But, as fludarabine 30 mg/m2, cytarabine 2000 mg/m2, amsacrine some patients are even refractory to first-line therapy, the 100 mg/m2 on days -10, -9, -8 and -7, anti-thymocyte majority of the responding patients unfortunately suffer globulin (ATG-Fresenius) 20 mg/kg body weight on days from relapse. Therefore, the probability of long-term -6, -5 and -4 and fractionated total body irradiation disease-free survival is o30%.1–5 Risk stratification based 2 Â 2 Gy on days -3, -2 and -1 (FLAMSA-ATG-TBI) on prognostic factors allows identification of high-risk before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. ALL patients with poor prognosis.6–12 Myeloablative At the time of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, 10 conditioning therapy followed by allogeneic hematopoietic patients were in complete remission (8 CR1; 2 CR2), 3 stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is currently the treatment with primary refractory and 2 suffered from refractory of choice for these high-risk patients.13–15 A combination of relapse.
    [Show full text]
  • RESEARCH ARTICLE Lobaplatin Combined Floxuridine/Pirarubicin
    DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.5.2057 The Effect Observation of LBP-based TACE for Unresectable Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma RESEARCH ARTICLE Lobaplatin Combined Floxuridine/Pirarubicin-based Transcatheter Hepatic Arterial Chemoembolization for Unresectable Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma Chang Zhao1, Xu-Jie Wang2*, Song Wang2*, Wei-Hua Feng2, Lei Shi2, Chun- Peng Yu2 Abstract Purpose: To assess the effect and safety of lobaplatin combinated floxuridine /pirarubicin in transcatheter hepatic arterial chemoembolization(TACE) of unresectable primary liver cancer. Patients and Methods: TACE combined with the chemotherapy regimen was used to treat 34 unresectable primary liver cancer patients. DSA/ MRI/CT/blood routine examinations were used to evaluate short term activity and toxicity after 4-5 weeks, the process being repeated if necessary. Results: Among the 34 cases, 1 (2.9%) showed a complete response, 21 (61.7%) a partial response, 8 (23.5%) stable disease, and 4 progressive disease, with a total effective rate of 67.6%. The content of alpha fetoprotein dropped by over 50% in 20 cases (58.8%). The rate of recovery was hepatalgia (88.2%), ascites (47.1%), appetite (55.9%), Performance Status(30.4%). The median follow-up time (MFT) was 281 days (63-558 days), and median progression-free survival was 118.5 days (95%, CI:88.8-148.2days). Adverse reactions (III-IV grade) were not common, with only 4 cases of vomiting and 2 cases of thrombocytopenia (III grade). Conclusions: Lobaplatin-based TACE is an effective and safe treatment for primary liver cancer. Keywords: Primary hepatic carcinoma - chemoembolization - platinum chemotherapy - clinical response Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 15 (5), 2057-2060 Introduction LBP-based TACE, male 29 cases, female 5 cases, average age for 57.2±10.7 years, 12 cases were biopsy-proven, Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common 22 cases were in line with the China Cancer Association malignant tumor .
    [Show full text]
  • CK0403, a 9‑Aminoacridine, Is a Potent Anti‑Cancer Agent in Human Breast Cancer Cells
    MOLECULAR MEDICINE REPORTS 13: 933-938, 2016 CK0403, a 9‑aminoacridine, is a potent anti‑cancer agent in human breast cancer cells YUAN-WAN SUN1, KUEN-YUAN CHEN2, CHUL-HOON KWON3 and KUN-MING CHEN1 1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA 17033, USA; 2Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei 8862, Taiwan, R.O.C.; 3Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy and Allied Health Professions, St. John's University, New York, NY 11439, USA Received November 11, 2014; Accepted October 22, 2015 DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2015.4604 Abstract. 3-({4-[4-(Acridin-9-ylamino)phenylthio]phenyl} reduced growth inhibitory activity under hypoxic conditions, (3-hydroxypropyl)amino)propan-1-ol (CK0403) is a which can induce autophagy. Collectively, the present results sulfur-containing 9-anilinoacridine analogue of amsacrine and supported that CK0403 is highly potent and more effective than was found to be more potent than its analogue 2-({4-[4-(acridin- CK0402 against estrogen receptor-negative and 9-ylamino)phenylthio]phenyl}(2-hydroxyethyl)amino) HER2-overexpressing breast cancer cell lines, suggesting its ethan-1-ol (CK0402) and amsacrine in the inhibition of the future application for chemotherapy in breast cancer. topoisomerase II-catalyzed decatenation reaction. A previous study by our group reported that CK0402 was effective against Introduction numerous breast cancer cell lines, and the combination of CK0402 with herceptin enhanced its activity in HER2(+) Breast cancer is the most common type of cancer diagnosed SKBR-3 cells. In order to identify novel chemotherapeutic agents in American women and is the second most common cause with enhanced potency, the present study explored the potential of cancer-associated mortality.
    [Show full text]
  • In Vitro and in Vivo Reversal of Resistance to 5-Fluorouracil in Colorectal Cancer Cells with a Novel Stealth Double-Liposomal Formulation
    British Journal of Cancer (2007) 97, 919 – 926 & 2007 Cancer Research UK All rights reserved 0007 – 0920/07 $30.00 www.bjcancer.com In vitro and in vivo reversal of resistance to 5-fluorouracil in colorectal cancer cells with a novel stealth double-liposomal formulation 1 1 1 1 2 3 *,1 R Fanciullino , S Giacometti , C Mercier , C Aubert , C Blanquicett , P Piccerelle and J Ciccolini 1 2 EA3286-Laboratoire de Pharmacocine´tique, Universite´ de la Me´diterrane´e, Marseille, France; Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Emory 3 University, Atlanta, GA, USA; Laboratoire de Pharmacie Gale´nique, Faculte´ de Pharmacie, 27 Bd Jean Moulin, Marseille 05 13385, France Drug resistance is a major cause of treatment failure in cancer chemotherapy, including that with the extensively prescribed antimetabolite, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). In this study, we tried to reverse 5-FU resistance by using a double-punch strategy: combining 5-FU with a biochemical modulator to improve its tumoural activation and encapsulating both these agents in one same stealth liposome. Experiments carried out in the highly resistant, canonical SW620 human colorectal model showed a up to 80% sensitisation to 5-FU when these cells were treated with our liposomal formulation. Results with this formulation demonstrated 30% higher tumoural drug uptake, better activation with increased active metabolites including critical-5-fluoro-2-deoxyuridine-5-monophos- phate, superior inhibition (98%) of tumour thymidylate synthase, and subsequently, higher induction of both early and late apoptosis. Drug monitoring showed that higher and sustained exposure was achieved in rats treated with liposomal formulation. When examined in a xenograft animal model, our dual-agent liposomal formulation caused a 74% reduction in tumour size with a mean doubling in survival time, whereas standard 5-FU failed to exhibit significant antiproliferative activity as well as to increase the lifespan of tumour-bearing mice.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Floxuridine Oligonucleotide Conjugates Carrying Potential Enhancers of Cellular Uptake
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Article Evaluation of Floxuridine Oligonucleotide Conjugates Carrying Potential Enhancers of Cellular Uptake Anna Aviñó 1,2,*, Anna Clua 1,2 , Maria José Bleda 1 , Ramon Eritja 1,2,* and Carme Fàbrega 1,2 1 Institute for Advanced Chemistry of Catalonia (IQAC-CSIC), Jordi Girona 18-26, E-08034 Barcelona, Spain; [email protected] (A.C.); [email protected] (M.J.B.); [email protected] (C.F.) 2 Networking Center on Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine (CIBER-BBN), Jordi Girona 18-26, E-08034 Barcelona, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected] (A.A.); [email protected] (R.E.); Tel.: +34-934-006-100 (A.A.) Abstract: Conjugation of small molecules such as lipids or receptor ligands to anti-cancer drugs has been used to improve their pharmacological properties. In this work, we studied the biological effects of several small-molecule enhancers into a short oligonucleotide made of five floxuridine units. Specifically, we studied adding cholesterol, palmitic acid, polyethyleneglycol (PEG 1000), folic acid and triantennary N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc) as potential enhancers of cellular uptake. As expected, all these molecules increased the internalization efficiency with different degrees depending on the cell line. The conjugates showed antiproliferative activity due to their metabolic activation by nuclease degradation generating floxuridine monophosphate. The cytotoxicity and apoptosis assays showed an increase in the anti-cancer activity of the conjugates related to the floxuridine oligomer, but this effect did not correlate with the internalization results. Palmitic and folic acid conjugates provide the highest antiproliferative activity without having the highest internalization Citation: Aviñó, A.; Clua, A.; Bleda, results.
    [Show full text]
  • Floxuridine | Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
    PATIENT & CAREGIVER EDUCATION Floxuridine This information from Lexicomp® explains what you need to know about this medication, including what it’s used for, how to take it, its side effects, and when to call your healthcare provider. Warning This drug may cause unsafe effects. You will be closely watched when starting this drug. What is this drug used for? It is used to treat cancer. What do I need to tell my doctor BEFORE I take this drug? If you are allergic to this drug; any part of this drug; or any other drugs, foods, or substances. Tell your doctor about the allergy and what signs you had. If you have any of these health problems: Poor nutrition, an infection, or certain bone marrow problems like low white blood cell count, low platelet count, or low red blood cell count. If you are breast-feeding. Do not breast-feed while you take this drug. Floxuridine 1/7 This is not a list of all drugs or health problems that interact with this drug. Tell your doctor and pharmacist about all of your drugs (prescription or OTC, natural products, vitamins) and health problems. You must check to make sure that it is safe for you to take this drug with all of your drugs and health problems. Do not start, stop, or change the dose of any drug without checking with your doctor. What are some things I need to know or do while I take this drug? Tell all of your health care providers that you take this drug. This includes your doctors, nurses, pharmacists, and dentists.
    [Show full text]
  • Prodrugs: a Challenge for the Drug Development
    PharmacologicalReports Copyright©2013 2013,65,1–14 byInstituteofPharmacology ISSN1734-1140 PolishAcademyofSciences Drugsneedtobedesignedwithdeliveryinmind TakeruHiguchi [70] Review Prodrugs:A challengeforthedrugdevelopment JolantaB.Zawilska1,2,JakubWojcieszak2,AgnieszkaB.Olejniczak1 1 InstituteofMedicalBiology,PolishAcademyofSciences,Lodowa106,PL93-232£ódŸ,Poland 2 DepartmentofPharmacodynamics,MedicalUniversityofLodz,Muszyñskiego1,PL90-151£ódŸ,Poland Correspondence: JolantaB.Zawilska,e-mail:[email protected] Abstract: It is estimated that about 10% of the drugs approved worldwide can be classified as prodrugs. Prodrugs, which have no or poor bio- logical activity, are chemically modified versions of a pharmacologically active agent, which must undergo transformation in vivo to release the active drug. They are designed in order to improve the physicochemical, biopharmaceutical and/or pharmacokinetic properties of pharmacologically potent compounds. This article describes the basic functional groups that are amenable to prodrug design, and highlights the major applications of the prodrug strategy, including the ability to improve oral absorption and aqueous solubility, increase lipophilicity, enhance active transport, as well as achieve site-selective delivery. Special emphasis is given to the role of the prodrug concept in the design of new anticancer therapies, including antibody-directed enzyme prodrug therapy (ADEPT) andgene-directedenzymeprodrugtherapy(GDEPT). Keywords: prodrugs,drugs’ metabolism,blood-brainbarrier,ADEPT,GDEPT
    [Show full text]
  • Sequential Combination of Decitabine
    Li et al. Journal of Translational Medicine 2014, 12:167 http://www.translational-medicine.com/content/12/1/167 RESEARCH Open Access Sequential combination of decitabine and idarubicin synergistically enhances anti-leukemia effect followed by demethylating Wnt pathway inhibitor promoters and downregulating Wnt pathway nuclear target Kongfei Li1,2,3, Chao Hu1,3, Chen Mei6, Zhigang Ren4, Juan Carlos Vera5, Zhengping Zhuang5, Jie Jin1,3 and Hongyan Tong1,3* Abstract Background: The methylation inhibitor 5-Aza-2′-deoxycytidine (decitabine, DAC) has a great therapeutic value for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). But decitabine monotherapy was associated with a relatively low rate of complete remission in AML and MDS. We aimed to investigate the effect of several anti-leukemia drugs in combination with decitabine on the proliferation of myeloid leukemia cells, to select the most efficient combination group and explore the associated mechanisms of these combination therapies. Methods: Cell proliferation was tested by MTT assay and CFU-GM assay. Cell apoptosis was evaluated by Annexin V and PI staining in cell culture, TUNEL assay and transmission electron microscopy in animal study. MicroPET was used to imaging the tumor in mouse model. Molecular studies were conducted using microarray expression analysis, which was used to explore associated pathways, and real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR, western blot and immunohistochemistry, used to assess regulation of Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Statistical significance among groups was determined by one-way ANOVA analysis followed by post hoc Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test. Results: Among five anti-leukemia agents in combining with decitabine, the sequential combination of decitabine and idarubicin induced synergistic cell death in U937 cells, and this effect was verified in HEL, SKM-1 cells and AML cells isolated from AML patients.
    [Show full text]
  • Process for Producing Arsenic Trioxide Formulations
    (19) TZZ_964557B_T (11) EP 1 964 557 B1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION (45) Date of publication and mention (51) Int Cl.: of the grant of the patent: A61K 31/285 (2006.01) A61K 33/36 (2006.01) 02.01.2013 Bulletin 2013/01 A61P 35/02 (2006.01) (21) Application number: 08075200.9 (22) Date of filing: 10.11.1998 (54) Process for producing arsenic trioxide formulations Verfahren zur Herstellung von Arsentrioxidformulierungen Procédé de production de formulations à base de trioxide d’arsenic (84) Designated Contracting States: (74) Representative: Warner, James Alexander et al AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU Carpmaels & Ransford MC NL PT SE One Southampton Row London (30) Priority: 10.11.1997 US 64655 P WC1B 5HA (GB) (43) Date of publication of application: (56) References cited: 03.09.2008 Bulletin 2008/36 • KWONG Y L ET AL: "Delicious poison: Arsenic trioxide for the treatment of leukemia" BLOOD, (60) Divisional application: vol. 89, no. 9, 1 May 1997 (1997-05-01), pages 10177319.0 / 2 255 800 3487-3488, XP002195910 • SHEN S-X ET AL: "USE OF ARSENIC TRIOXIDE (62) Document number(s) of the earlier application(s) in (AS2O3) IN THE TREATMENT OF ACUTE accordance with Art. 76 EPC: PROMYELOCITIC LEUKEMIA (APL): II. CLINICAL 98957803.4 / 1 037 625 EFFICACY AND PHARMACOKINETICS IN RELAPSED PATIENTS" BLOOD, W.B. (73) Proprietor: MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING SAUNDERS, PHILADELPHIA, VA, US, vol. 89, no. CANCER CENTER 9, 1 May 1997 (1997-05-01), pages 3354-3360, New York, NY 10021 (US) XP000891715 ISSN: 0006-4971 • KONIG ET AL: "Comparative activity of (72) Inventors: melarsoprol and arsenic trioxide in chronic B - • Warrell, Raymond, P., Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • How Chemotherapy Drugs Work
    cancer.org | 1.800.227.2345 How Chemotherapy Drugs Work Many different kinds of chemotherapy or chemo drugs are used to treat cancer – either alone or in combination with other drugs or treatments. These drugs are very different in their chemical composition (what they are made of), how they are prescribed and given, how useful they are in treating certain types of cancer, and the side effects they might have. It's important to know that not all medicines and drugs to treat cancer work the same way. Other drugs to treat cancer work differently, such as targeted therapy1, hormone therapy, and immunotherapy2. The information below describes how traditional or standard chemotherapy works. Chemotherapy works with the cell cycle Every time any new cell is formed, it goes through a usual process to become a fully functioning (or mature) cell. The process involves a series of phases and is called the cell cycle. Chemotherapy drugs target cells at different phases of the cell cycle. Understanding how these drugs work helps doctors predict which drugs are likely to work well together. Doctors can also plan how often doses of each drug should be given based on the timing of the cell phases. Cancer cells tend to form new cells more quickly than normal cells and this makes them a better target for chemotherapy drugs. However, chemo drugs can’t tell the difference between healthy cells and cancer cells. This means normal cells are damaged along with the cancer cells, and this causes side effects. Each time chemo is given, it means trying to find a balance between killing the cancer cells (in order to cure or control the disease) and sparing the normal cells (to lessen side effects).
    [Show full text]
  • Myocardial Ischemia and Acute Coronary Syndromes
    CHAPTER 23 Myocardial Ischemia and Acute Coronary Syndromes Kevin M. Sowinski Myocardial ischemia occurs as a result of increased The specific mechanisms by which drugs may facil- myocardial demand, decreased myocardial oxygen itate or cause MIs will be discussed. supply, or both, and most commonly occurs in An acute coronary syndrome is associated with patients with atherosclerotic coronary artery disease. three clinical manifestations: ST- segment elevation This chapter discusses the specific mechanisms by MI, non-ST- segment elevation MI, and unstable which drug therapy may cause increased myocardial angina.1,2 For the purposes of this chapter, it is dif- oxygen demand or decreased supply. ficult to separate the acute coronary syndromes Angina pectoris is a clinical syndrome of chest because, for the most part, the individual case data discomfort caused by reversible myocardial isch- in the literature do not provide sufficient detail. emia that produces disturbances in myocardial Therefore, in most cases, the specific acute coro- function but no myocardial necrosis. Myocardial nary syndromes will not be discussed separately. ischemia can also occur without any symptoms of Furthermore, based on the available literature, it is angina and is typically referred to as silent myocar- difficult to distinguish drugs based on whether they dial ischemia. Acute myocardial infarction (MI) is a cause myocardial ischemia or infarction. clinical syndrome associated with the development of a prolonged occlusion of a coronary artery lead- CAUSATIVE AGENTS ing to decreased oxygen supply, myocardial isch- emia, and irreversible damage to myocardial tissue. Drugs reported to cause angina pectoris, myocar- MI in patients with coronary artery disease is usu- dial ischemia, an acute coronary syndrome, or all ally associated with a coronary artery thrombosis three are listed in Table 23-1.3-462 Drug- induced superimposed on a ruptured atherosclerotic plaque.
    [Show full text]
  • Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
    CLINICAL RESEARCH SERVICES TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SCHEMA 7 1.0 BACKGROUND 8 1.1 Study Disease 8 1.2 Rationale 9 2.0 OBJECTIVES 9 2.1 Primary Objectives 9 2.2 Secondary Objectives 9 3.0 PATIENT SELECTION 10 3.1 Inclusion Criteria 10 3.2 Exclusion Criteria 11 3.3 Enrollment Procedures 12 4.0 TREATMENT PLAN 12 4.1 Agent Administration 12 4.2 Concurrent Medication 13 4.3 Drug Treatment Schedule 14 4.4 Duration of Therapy 14 5.0 CLINICAL AND LABORATORY EVALUATIONS 15 5.1 Baseline/Pretreatment Evaluation 15 5.2 Evaluations during Treatment 16 5.3 Post-treatment Evaluation for Patients Not Receiving Bone Marrow Transplant 17 5.4 Final Evaluations for Patients Accepted for Bone Marrow Transplant 18 6.0 DOSING DELAYS/DOSE MODIFICATIONS 18 6.1 Hematologic Toxicity 18 6.2 Non-hematologic Toxicity 18 7.0 AGENT FORMULATIONS AND PROCUREMENT 19 7.1 Zidovudine 19 7.2 Doxorubicin 20 7.3 Methotrexate 21 7.4 Hydroxyurea 22 7.5 Leucovorin 23 7.6 Ritiximab 24 8.0 CORRELATIVE/SPECIAL STUDIES 26 5 CLINICAL RESEARCH SERVICES 9.0 MEASUREMENT OF EFFECT 27 9.1 Response Assessment 27 9.2 Definition of Response 27 10.0 ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING 30 10.1 Definitions 30 10.2 Adverse Event Reporting With Commercial Agents 31 11.0 DATA REPORTING 32 11.1 Records to Be Kept 32 11.2 Role of Data Management 32 12.0 CRITERIA FOR DISCONTINUATION OF THERAPY 32 12.1 Permanent Withdrawal 32 12.1 Permanent Withdrawal Evaluations 32 13.0 STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS 33 13.1 Overview 33 13.2 Definitions 33 13.3 Study Size and Precision 34 13.4 Statistical Analysis Plan 34 13.5 Correlative
    [Show full text]