Certified Local Government (Clg) 2014-2015 Annual Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Certified Local Government (Clg) 2014-2015 Annual Report SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING CERTIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENT PROGRAM REPORT OCTOBER 1, 2014 - SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Certified Local Government Program -- 2014-2015 Annual Report (Reporting period is from October 1, 2014 through September 30, 2015) CompleteINSTRUCTIONS: Se This a Word form with expanding text fields and check boxes. It will probably open as Read-Only. Save it to your computer before you begin entering data. This form can be saved and reopened. Because this is a WORD form, it will behave generally like a regular Word document except that the font, size, and color are set by the text field. Start typing where indicated to provide the requested information. Click on the check box to mark either yes or no. To enter more than one item in a particular text box, just insert an extra line (Enter) between the items. Save completed form and email as an attachment to [email protected]. You can also convert it to a PDF and send as an email attachment. Use the Acrobat tab in WORD and select Create and Attach to Email. You can then attach the required documents to that email. If the attachments are too large (greater than10mb total), you will need to send them in a second or third email. Name of CLG City and County of San Francisco Report Prepared by: Timothy Frye Date of commission/board review: April 6, 2016 Minimum Requirements for Certification I. Enforce Appropriate State or Local Legislation for the Designation and Protection of Historic Properties. A. Preservation Laws 1. What amendments or revisions, if any, are you considering to the certified ordinance? Please forward drafts or proposals. REMINDER: Pursuant to the CLG Agreement, OHP must have the opportunity to review and comment on ordinance changes prior to adoption. Changes that do not meet the CLG requirements could affect certification status. None 2. Provide an electronic link to your ordinance or appropriate section(s) of the municipal/zoning code. Type here. 1 Certified Local Government Program -- 2014-2015 Annual Report (Reporting period is from October 1, 2014 through September 30, 2015) B. New Local Landmark Designations (Comprehensive list of properties/districts designated under local ordinance, HPOZ, etc.) 1. During the reporting period, October 1, 2014 – September 30, 2015, what properties/districts have been locally designated? Property Name/Address Date Designated If a district, number of Date Recorded by County contributors Recorder Swedish American Hall May 8, 2015 Type here. December 1, 2015 2174 Market Street R.L. “Rube” Goldberg May 21, 2015 December 1, 2015 Building 182-198 Gough Street 149 9th Street June 2, 2015 December 1, 2015 REMINDER: Pursuant to California Government Code § 27288.2, “the county recorder shall record a certified resolution establishing an historical resources designation issued by the State Historical Resources Commission or a local agency, or unit thereof.” 2. What properties/districts have been de-designated this past year? For districts, include the total number of resource contributors. Property Name/Address Date Removed Type here. Type here. C. Historic Preservation Element/Plan 1. Do you address historic preservation in your general plan? ☐ No ☐ Yes, in a separate historic preservation element. ☒ Yes, it is included in another element. Provide an electronic link to the historic preservation section(s) of the General Plan. General Plan Priority Policies: http://www.sf-planning.org/ftp/General_Plan/index.htm Urban Design Element: http://www.sf-planning.org/ftp/General_Plan/I5_Urban_Design.htm 2 Certified Local Government Program -- 2014-2015 Annual Report (Reporting period is from October 1, 2014 through September 30, 2015) 2. Have you made any updates to your historic preservation plan or historic preservation element in your community’s general plan? ☐ Yes ☒ No If you have, provide an electronic link. Type here. 3. When will your next General Plan update occur? The HPC provided review and comment on the Draft Preservation Element (now renamed the Heritage Conservation Element) during the summer of 2014 on June 16, July 16, and August 20,2014. Department staff also provided the Planning Commission an informational presentation on our work to date at its June 18, 2014 hearing. The initial community outreach open house was held at the Old Mint on September 10, 2014. The Department also created a website for the public interested in participating in events related to the drafting and adoption of the element - http://www.sf-planning.org/index.aspx?page=3825 The Planning Department is preparing an initial study to fulfill obligations under CEQA. Following the completion of CEQA review the document will be presented to the Historic Preservation Commission and the Planning Commission for recommendation prior to final adoption by the Board of Supervisors. D. Review Responsibilities 1. Who takes responsibility for design review or Certificates of Appropriateness? ☐ All projects subject to design review go the commission. ☒ Some projects are reviewed at the staff level without commission review. What is the threshold between staff-only review and full-commission review? Authorized by Sections 1006.2 and 1111.1 of the Planning Code, the Historic Preservation Commission identified scopes of work to Article 10 City Landmarks or Significant and Contributory Buildings within the C-3 zoning district, or any building located within Conservation District, deemed minor and eligible for Planning Department Preservation staff review through an Administrative Certificate of Appropriateness or a Minor Permit to Alter. Delegating Motion No. 241 are included in Attachment A & B. 2. California Environmental Quality Act What is the role of the staff and commission in providing input to CEQA documents prepared for or by the local government? The Planning Department acts as the lead agency for the City and Country of San 3 Certified Local Government Program -- 2014-2015 Annual Report (Reporting period is from October 1, 2014 through September 30, 2015) Francisco in preparation of CEQA documents. Planning Department Preservation staff consults with the Environmental Review Officer in the evaluation of properties to determine eligibility as historical resources for the purposes of CEQA and the identification of any potential impacts. Working in consultation with the Environmental Planning Division of the Department, Preservation staff prepares and reviews CEQA documents and brings them through the public review and certification process. During the reporting period of October 1, 2014 through September 30, 2015, the Planning Department Preservation staff received 321 referrals for historic review associated with environmental evaluation applications. Of those referrals, 293 required completion of a historic resource evaluation determination by Planning Department Preservation staff. What is the role of the staff and commission in reviewing CEQA documents for projects that are proposed within the jurisdiction of the local government? The Historic Preservation Commission provides review and comment on CEQA documents where potential significant impacts to historical resources have been identified. Its comments are forwarded to the Environmental Review Officer and to the Planning Commission for consideration during the public review and certification process. During the reporting period of October 1, 2014 through September 30, 2015, the Historic Preservation Commission reviewed & commented on 3 Draft Environmental Impact Reports (DEIRs). Planning Department Preservation staff prepared 293 Historic Resource Evaluation Responses (HRER) and Preservation Team Review (PTR) forms, which involved determining eligibility of properties as historic resources under CEQA, and analyzing potential impacts of proposed projects to properties that were determined to be historic resources under CEQA. 3. Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act What is the role of the staff and commission in providing input to Section 106 documents prepared for or by; the local government? On January 19, 2007 a Programmatic Agreement was executed among the City and County of San Francisco, the California State Historic Preservation Officer, and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (Advisory Council) regarding properties affected by the City’s use of funds subject to Part 58 of Title 24 of the Code of Federal Regulations. The Programmatic Agreement contains stipulations that ensure the City’s responsibilities under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act are carried out in accordance with the appropriate regulations for all undertakings that may have an effect on properties included in or eligible for inclusion in the 4 Certified Local Government Program -- 2014-2015 Annual Report (Reporting period is from October 1, 2014 through September 30, 2015) National Register of Historic Places. The Mayor’s Office of Housing administers Part 58 activities in the City and County of San Francisco. What is the role of the staff and commission in reviewing Section 106 documents for projects that are proposed within the jurisdiction of the local government? The determination of eligibility is made by the Planning Department based upon information provided by the Certifying Officer. The Planning Department documents its review of the undertaking on Form B, Section 106 Review Form. If the State Office of Historic Preservation has not made a previous determination of eligibility for the resource, the Planning Department proceeds to do so. Additionally, Form
Recommended publications
  • China Camp State Park 101 Peacock Gap Trail San Rafael, CA 94901 (415) 456-0766
    Our Mission The mission of California State Parks is to provide for the health, inspiration and an Pablo Bay’s education of the people of California by helping S China Camp to preserve the state’s extraordinary biological diversity, protecting its most valued natural and intertidal salt marshlands cultural resources, and creating opportunities State Park for high-quality outdoor recreation. provide ideal habitat for grass shrimp and shorebirds near the remnants of a former California State Parks supports equal access. Chinese fishing village. Prior to arrival, visitors with disabilities who need assistance should contact the park at (415) 456-0766. If you need this publication in an alternate format, contact [email protected]. CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS P.O. Box 942896 Sacramento, CA 94296-0001 For information call: (800) 777-0369 (916) 653-6995, outside the U.S. 711, TTY relay service www.parks.ca.gov China Camp State Park 101 Peacock Gap Trail San Rafael, CA 94901 (415) 456-0766 www.parks.ca.gov/chinacamp © 2010 California State Parks (Rev. 2015) M agnificent panoramic views and miles The Coast Miwok land at Point San Pedro were able of multi-use trails greet visitors to China was eventually taken from them through to continue Camp State Park. History buffs, water a Spanish land grant called Rancho San harvesting enthusiasts, hikers, cyclists, and equestrians Pedro, Santa Margarita y las Gallinas. The shrimp, aided will all find unforgettable experiences here. grant was given to Timothy Murphy. After by a new net Murphy’s death in 1850, that land was designed PARK HISTORY divided and sold to the McNear family, the in 1924 by Native People owners until the mid-1900s.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 3.4 Biological Resources 3.4- Biological Resources
    SECTION 3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 3.4- BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES This section discusses the existing sensitive biological resources of the San Francisco Bay Estuary (the Estuary) that could be affected by project-related construction and locally increased levels of boating use, identifies potential impacts to those resources, and recommends mitigation strategies to reduce or eliminate those impacts. The Initial Study for this project identified potentially significant impacts on shorebirds and rafting waterbirds, marine mammals (harbor seals), and wetlands habitats and species. The potential for spread of invasive species also was identified as a possible impact. 3.4.1 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES SETTING HABITATS WITHIN AND AROUND SAN FRANCISCO ESTUARY The vegetation and wildlife of bayland environments varies among geographic subregions in the bay (Figure 3.4-1), and also with the predominant land uses: urban (commercial, residential, industrial/port), urban/wildland interface, rural, and agricultural. For the purposes of discussion of biological resources, the Estuary is divided into Suisun Bay, San Pablo Bay, Central San Francisco Bay, and South San Francisco Bay (See Figure 3.4-2). The general landscape structure of the Estuary’s vegetation and habitats within the geographic scope of the WT is described below. URBAN SHORELINES Urban shorelines in the San Francisco Estuary are generally formed by artificial fill and structures armored with revetments, seawalls, rip-rap, pilings, and other structures. Waterways and embayments adjacent to urban shores are often dredged. With some important exceptions, tidal wetland vegetation and habitats adjacent to urban shores are often formed on steep slopes, and are relatively recently formed (historic infilled sediment) in narrow strips.
    [Show full text]
  • China Camp State Park
    1 San Francisco Bay Area Water Trail Site Description for China Camp State Park Location, Ownership, and Management: China Camp State Park, owned by the California State Parks and operated by Friends of China Camp, is located on the San Rafael shoreline of San Pablo Bay off of North San Pedro Road Road. Boaters can launch from a scenic beach located next to the pier and historic China Camp Village. The site is popular with kayakers and stand up paddlers because it is very scenic and is a good launch spot to explore the Marin shoreline. Contact Name: Maria Mowrey Contact Phone: (707) 769-5652 Contact E-mail: [email protected] Village Beach (south) Boat Launch Path Village Beach (north) Facility Description: China Camp State Park offers an exceptionally scenic setting for non- motorized boating from the sandy shoreline near the China Camp village. The beach near China Camp village is a sand and pebble beach that extends 0.25 miles, with a designated boat launch area located in the southern portion of the village area parking lot. China Camp village has an unpaved parking lot, restrooms, picnic tables, boat rinse, and showers. The Quan Bros. snack shop at China Camp village is open on weekends. Food, beverages, and ice cream are available. The museum and remaining historic structures from the village and a pier are also located here. Paved parking is also available at the top of the hill leading down to China Camp village, approximately 600 feet from the boat launch area. In addition to facilities at the village, China Camp State Park offers swimming, windsurfing, wildlife-watching, hike-in / bike-in camping, picknicking and 15 miles of mountain biking, hiking, and equestrian trails.
    [Show full text]
  • San Francisco Bay Plan
    San Francisco Bay Plan San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission In memory of Senator J. Eugene McAteer, a leader in efforts to plan for the conservation of San Francisco Bay and the development of its shoreline. Photo Credits: Michael Bry: Inside front cover, facing Part I, facing Part II Richard Persoff: Facing Part III Rondal Partridge: Facing Part V, Inside back cover Mike Schweizer: Page 34 Port of Oakland: Page 11 Port of San Francisco: Page 68 Commission Staff: Facing Part IV, Page 59 Map Source: Tidal features, salt ponds, and other diked areas, derived from the EcoAtlas Version 1.0bc, 1996, San Francisco Estuary Institute. STATE OF CALIFORNIA GRAY DAVIS, Governor SAN FRANCISCO BAY CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION 50 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 2600 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111 PHONE: (415) 352-3600 January 2008 To the Citizens of the San Francisco Bay Region and Friends of San Francisco Bay Everywhere: The San Francisco Bay Plan was completed and adopted by the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission in 1968 and submitted to the California Legislature and Governor in January 1969. The Bay Plan was prepared by the Commission over a three-year period pursuant to the McAteer-Petris Act of 1965 which established the Commission as a temporary agency to prepare an enforceable plan to guide the future protection and use of San Francisco Bay and its shoreline. In 1969, the Legislature acted upon the Commission’s recommendations in the Bay Plan and revised the McAteer-Petris Act by designating the Commission as the agency responsible for maintaining and carrying out the provisions of the Act and the Bay Plan for the protection of the Bay and its great natural resources and the development of the Bay and shore- line to their highest potential with a minimum of Bay fill.
    [Show full text]
  • Marin Conservation League Walk Into
    This park receives supportMarin in part Conservation from a nonprofit League organization. For further information, contact: Marin State Park Association WalkP.O. Box 223, Into Inverness, (Conservation) CA 94937 History #11 China Camp State Park Saturday, May 5, 2012 Marin Conservation League 1623–A Fifth Avenue, San Rafael, CA 94901 415.485.6257 marinconservationleague.org Marin Conservation League was founded in 1934 to preserve, protect and enhance the natural assets of Marin County. Marin Conservation League Walk Into (Conservation) History # 11 CHINA CAMP STATE PARK MAY 5, 2012 – 9:30 to 1:00 Today’s Walk As early as 1957, a state report Walk Leaders: had recognized that “this area Our walk begins at the north kiosk Yvonne Brown, Friends of China Camp (should) be included in the State entrance to the Park and parking Park System to meet existing and lot for Back Ranch Meadows Louise Kanter Lipsey, Community Activist future pubic needs.” That report camping area. We will follow the Kathy Cuneo, Ph. D., Botanist suggested a park of 2,700 acres, Shoreline Trail that ascends slightly Nona Dennis, Marin Conservation League with 6 miles of shoreline on San and then follows the contour in Rafael and San Pablo Bays. In and out of the wooded canyons of 1970, the Association of Bay Area San Pedro Ridge, crosses the Back how to help the Friends of China into public ownership only with a governments (ABAG) proposed Ranch Fire Road, and loops back Camp keep the Park open against huge collaborative citizen effort a greenbelt plan that called for to the south side of parking area.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Citizen Established 1929 Nottofxs Puwcatton of the Jopcrtese American Cfflzorw Leogue (JACL) $1.50 Poripaid (U.5
    Beyond Barbed Wire launches 4 10-dty tour Pacific Citizen Established 1929 NOttofxS PuWcatton of the Jopcrtese American Cfflzorw Leogue (JACL) $1.50 poripaid (U.5.. CaU / $130 (Jc^ Ak) #2827 /Vol. 125. No, 3 JACL website; www.jacl.org / PC e mAil; paccit ^ aoi com Senate subcommittee approves Leadership development and funds for Manzanar site WASHINGTON - The-Senate ^l^d for the pngect, expects the membership focus of PNWDC/IDC Interior AppropriationB Sub­ bill to pass withm a few weeks. committee on ^day approved Sue Embr^, head of the Man ­ $310,000 in funding for the Man- zanar Committee who worked to Bi-District/youth conference zanzar National lUatoric Site on get the former camp designated July18. BY car 5une aoyagi as a national historic site, would AniMnlEdher The funds will be i^ed for con ­ like to see some of the money struction projects throu^out the It’s often been said: if JACL is used to ' transform the former to remain a viable and relevant site of the WWII internment auditorium into a visitor center. > organization into the next millen­ camp in Inyo County, Calif., ‘The Manzanar National His­ nium, it's going to take the coor ­ whidj was transfered to the U5. toric Site represents a lastii^ dinate efforts of both the older National Park Service eariier this symbol to acknowl^ge the tragic and younger members. year. \ historic injustice committ^ I The funding bill must now pass That ’s why the Pacific North ­ agmnst thousands of Americans,' west and totermountain Dis­ through a congressional confer ­ said Sen.
    [Show full text]
  • 3Rd Quarter 2020 This Month's Articles
    3rd Quarter 2020 Hello members of the Park Rangers Association of California! We are trying a new template for this Quarter's Signpost newsletter. Let us know what you think! We hope you are all staying safe and healthy during this strange and stressful year. Click here to view this email in your browser This Month's Articles Under the Flat Hat 2021 Conference PRAC Cancelled Supports BLM President Matt Cerkel writes about Parks But keep reading to A Statement from the and being a Park find out about an Park Rangers Ranger in light of the exciting online Association Board of Black Lives Matter speaker's series that Directors Movement we are planning! read more >> read more >> read more >> Statement of Support Photo Credit: Annette Bernhardt The Park Ranger’s Association of California stands in solidarity with George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, Steve Taylor, Ahmaud Arbery, Tony McDade, Rayshard Brooks and the millions of Black people who have lost their lives to violence upheld by White supremacy. These public lynchings have rightfully sparked a long overdue global shift that is evident in the massive protest movement. We know that these are not isolated events but a culmination of over 400 years of racialized terror against Black people. For over half of the United States’ history, slavery was legal. Even after emancipation, Black people have experienced segregation, mass incarceration, barriers to resources and ongoing disenfranchisement. It would be a dangerous mistake to believe that racial violence is isolated to the distant past — when in fact it continues to exist within our own communities.
    [Show full text]
  • China Camp State Park State Camp China
    groups, came to California with the prospect of mining of prospect the with California to came groups, often had sweathouses and dance houses. Sir Francis Sir houses. dance and sweathouses had often a catch a in ng bringi Quan Frank history. fishing. The Chinese, like many other immigrant other many like Chinese, The fishing. dome framework of light poles. Larger settlements Larger poles. light of framework dome forgotten in California in forgotten 1860s when the Chinese immigrants began shrimp began immigrants Chinese the when 1860s Houses were built of grass and tule thatching over a over thatching tule and grass of built were Houses life that has been generally been has that life A significant era began for China Camp in the mid- the in Camp China for began era significant A ous sites have been found in the park. the in found been have sites ous visitors to imagine a way of way a imagine to visitors THE CHINESE THE ten individuals living in each. The remains of numer- of remains The each. in living individuals ten exhibit makes it easy for easy it makes exhibit consisted of ten or twelve households, with eight to eight with households, twelve or ten of consisted informative museum informative t Rock Cove looking south (ca early 1900s) early (ca south looking Cove Rock t Ra from Lake County tribes. Their village site typically site village Their tribes. County Lake from been preserved, and an and preserved, been locally unobtainable resources as high-grade obsidian high-grade as resources unobtainable locally historic structures have structures historic beads from clamshells, and traded them for such for them traded and clamshells, from beads in San Francisco Bay Francisco San in Camp State Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of State Hospitals Deferred Maintenenace Project List
    Control Section 6.10 Draft Project Lists - Page 1 Department of State Hospitals Deferred Maintenenace Project List - 2016-17 Facility Location Project Title Estimated Cost Department of State Hospitals Replacement of Roof and 47 Air Handlers. The hospital has experienced water damage in HVAC ducting, $ 55,000,000 Atascadero - Main Building electrical conduits, light fixtures, panels, smoke detectors. Water is also known to have penetrated the concrete roof system and is rusting the metal steel within, which will likely compromise the building's structural integrity. This building contains all patient housing units, treatment spaces, all clinics and most staff offices. Department of State Hospitals Replacement of Roof and 4 Air Handlers. This building provides patient housing and has been cited by the $ 5,200,000 Metropolitan - Secured Nursing California Department of Public Health due to the leaking roof. Facility Department of State Hospitals Roof Replacement. This building provides patient housing, specialized patient housing, admission suite, $ 3,800,000 Patton - Edward Bernath and patient clinics. Building Total $ 64,000,000 DRAFT Control Section 6.10 Draft Project Lists - Page 2 Judicial Council Deferred Maintenance Project List - 2016-17 Facility Location Project Title Estimated Cost Alameda Hayward Hall of Justice Roof Replacement $ 627,000 Los Angeles Airport Courthouse Roof Replacement $ 555,000 Santa Barbara Santa Maria Bldg G Roof Replacement $ 255,000 Riverside Riverside Juvenile Justice Trailer Roof Replacement $ 24,000 San Bernardino San Bernardino Courthouse Roof Replacement $ 157,000 Santa Barbara Santa Maria Courts Bldgs C + D Roof Replacement $ 577,000 Santa Barbara Santa Maria Courts, Bldg F Gutters/Downspouts Replacement $ 11,000 Solano Solano Justice Building Skylight Replacement $ 33,000 Alameda Wiley W.
    [Show full text]
  • California Clapper Rail Population Monitoring 2009 Annual Report
    2013 Annual Report to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service: California Clapper Rail (Rallus longirostris obsoletus) TE-807078-14 Submitted to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Sacramento 8 January 2014 Submitted by Point Blue Conservation Science Julian Wood, Xeronimo Castaneda, Megan Elrod, Nadav Nur Point Blue Conservation Science, 3820 Cypress Drive #11, Petaluma, CA 94954 Contact: [email protected] Downloaded from http://meridian.allenpress.com/jfwm/article-supplement/203624/pdf/092014-jfwm-069_s7 by guest on 02 October 2021 INTRODUCTION The California Clapper Rail (Rallus longirostris obsoletus), hereafter, CCR, is one of the most endangered species in California. The species is dependent on tidal wetlands, which have decreased over 75% from the historical extent in San Francisco Bay. A complete survey of its population and distribution within the San Francisco Bay Estuary was begun in 2005. In 2013, Point Blue Conservation Science (formerly PRBO) completed the ninth year of field work designed to improve Estuary-wide population estimates, trends in abundance, and information on important habitat and landscape features for the CCR. Field work was performed in collaboration with partners conducting call- count surveys including Avocet Research Associates (ARA), California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), California Coastal Conservancy’s Invasive Spartina Project (ISP), and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). This report summarizes Point Blue’s California Clapper Rail surveys in 2013 under U.S. Fish and Wildlife service permit TE-807078-14. In previous years (2005-2011), Point Blue received funding to compile and analyze data from all agencies and organizations participating in standardized Baywide CCR surveys.
    [Show full text]
  • Campgrounds in Marin County and Along the Sonoma Coast
    National Park Service Point Reyes U.S. Department of the Interior Point Reyes National Seashore Campgrounds in Marin County and along the Sonoma Coast NATIONAL PARK SERVICE CAMPGROUNDS Mount Tamalpais State Park Camping reservations for many NPS sites: https://www.parks.ca.gov/?page_id=471 1-877-444-6777 or https://www.recreation.gov/ 415-388-2070. $8 day use fee. Point Reyes National Seashore Pantoll and Bootjack Campgrounds – 19 miles south of the https://www.nps.gov/pore/ Bear Valley Visitor Center, on Panoramic Highway. 15 walk- Visit www.recreation.gov or call 1-877-444-6777 for in (100 yards) tent sites. 8 person limit per site. Self-contained reservations. Only backcountry campgrounds, located vehicles can stay one night in the parking lot between 6 1.4 to 5.5 miles from nearest trailheads, and boat-in sites pm and 9 am. $25 per night, first come, first served; self- on Tomales Bay are available. No drive-in campgrounds. registration. Restrooms, water, and firewood available. Permits required and may be obtained at the Bear Valley Steep Ravine Cabins – One mile south of Stinson Beach. Visitor Center. $20 per site/night for up to 6 people, $40 or 10 rustic cabins and 6 hike-in campsites. $100 per cabin per $50 per group site/night for up to 25 people. No pets. night/$25 per tent site. Five people and one vehicle per site or cabin. Primitive toilets, water, and firewood nearby. No pets. Golden Gate National Recreation Area Reservation only. https://www.nps.gov/goga/ 415-331-1540.
    [Show full text]
  • The Natural Scene in the San Francisco Bay Area
    Permaculture Education Eco Agriculture 32) Green Gulch Farm Renewable Technology 61) San Joaquin River Conservancy 74) Blake Garden 110) Coyote Hills Regional Park 145) Leslie Shao-ming Sun Field Station Green Schools 213) Grizzly Island Wildlife Area GreatViews &Vistas 17171771 1) Humboldt State Campus Center 16) Arcata Educational Farm www.sfzc.org/ggfindex.htm 49) Schatz Solar Hydrogen www. riverparkway.org www-laep.ced.berkeley.edu/laep/ ebparks.org/parks/coyote.htm www.jr-solar.stanford.edu 179) HSU Environmental Engineering www.suisunwildlife.org 250) Mt. Vision, Point Reyes Peninsula 1 for Appropriate Technology www.humboldt.edu/~farm 33) Slide Ranch www.slideranch.org Energy Research Center 62) Monterey Bay Coastal Trail blakegarden/garden.html 111) Hayward Shoreline Interpretive Ctr. 146) Hewlett Foundation Building* www.humboldt.edu/~ere_dep 214) Audubon Canyon Ranch 251) Mt. Tamalpais 222131311 Arcata166 15959 17) Sustainable Agriculture Farm, 34) M.L. King Edible Schoolyard 75) UC Botanical Garden 147) San Mateo Green Buildings 180) Mendocino Ecological Learning Ctr. 252) Angel Island Eureka www.humboldt.edu/~ccat www.humboldt.edu/~serc www.evansmonterey.com/bobTours www.haywardrec.org/hayshore.html www.egret.org 2) Island Mountain Institute Redwood College www.edibleschoolyard.org 50) Arcata City Hall PV Solar System Special Gardens www.botanicalgarden.berkeley.edu 112) Edwards SF Bay Wildlife Refuge *www.recycleworks.org/ www.melc.us 215) Las Gallinas Wildlife Area & 253) Berkeley, Cesar Chavez Park 49,50500 www.imisa.org www.newfarm.org 35) People’s Grocery 51) Solar Living Center 63) Mendocino Botanical Gardens 76) Berkeley’s 30 Community Gardens www.desfbayfws.gov greenbuilding/localgbldgs.html 181) Emerald Earth China Camp State Park 11 Spinnaker Way 222322 2202 20517979 113) Newark Slough Learning Center 148) San Jose West Valley Solar Library 22299 3) Mendocino Ecological Learning Ctr.
    [Show full text]