View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Sussex Research Online The Version of Record of this manuscript has been published and is available as: Valeska Huber, Tamson Pietsch & Katharina Rietzler, “Women’s International Thought and the New Professions, 1900-1940”, Modern Intellectual History (2019) https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479244319000131 Women’s International Thought and the New Professions, 1900-1940 Valeska Huber,
[email protected] Tamson Pietsch,
[email protected] Katharina Rietzler,
[email protected] Abstract This article examines the “new professions” as alternative settings where women thought and wrote about the international. Presenting the case studies of Fannie Fern Andrews, Mary Parker Follett and Florence Wilson, it shows that, in emerging professional and disciplinary contexts that have hitherto lain beyond the purview of historians of international thought, these women developed their thinking about the international. The insights they derived from their practical work in schools, immigrant communities and libraries led them to emphasize the mechanics of participation in international affairs and caused them to think across the scales of the individual, the local group and relations between nations. By moving beyond the history of organizations and networks and instead looking for the professional settings and audiences which enabled women to theorize, this article shifts both established understandings of what counts as international thought and traditional conceptions of who counts as an international thinker. This article examines the “new professions” as alternative settings where women thought and wrote about the international in the first half of the twentieth century.1 As social workers, librarians and workers in the teaching sector, women sought to both shape public life in the expanding welfare states of the North Atlantic and develop concepts that addressed questions of international order.