The Provision of Cross– Border Health Services for Wales

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Provision of Cross– Border Health Services for Wales House of Commons Welsh Affairs Committee The Provision of cross– border health services for Wales Fifth Report of Session 2008–09 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 17 March 2009 HC 56 Incorporating HC 401 i-vii, Session 207-08 Published on 27 March 2009 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Welsh Affairs Committee The Welsh Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Office of the Secretary of State for Wales (including relations with the National Assembly for Wales). Current membership Dr Hywel Francis MP (Labour, Aberavon) (Chairman) Mr David T.C. Davies MP (Conservative, Monmouth) Ms Nia Griffith MP (Labour, Llanelli) Mrs Siân C. James MP (Labour, Swansea East) Mr David Jones MP (Conservative, Clwyd West) Mr Martyn Jones MP (Labour, Clwyd South) Rt Hon Alun Michael MP (Labour and Co-operative, Cardiff South and Penarth) Mr Albert Owen MP (Labour, Ynys Môn) Mr Mark Pritchard MP (Conservative, The Wrekin) Mr Mark Williams MP (Liberal Democrat, Ceredigion) Mr Hywel Williams MP (Plaid Cymru, Caernarfon) Powers The committee is one of the Departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the internet at www.parliament.uk/parliamentary_committees/welsh_affairs_committee.cfm. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee is Dr Sue Griffiths (Clerk), Judy Goodall (Inquiry Manager), Georgina Holmes-Skelton (Second Clerk), Carys Jones (Committee Specialist), Christine Randall (Senior Committee Assistant), Annabel Goddard (Committee Assistant), Tes Stranger (Committee Support Assistant) and Rebecca Jones (Media Officer). Contacts All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerk of the Welsh Affairs Committee, House of Commons, 7 Millbank, London SW1P 3JA. The telephone number for general enquiries is 020 7219 6189 and the Committee’s email address is [email protected]. The Provision of cross-border health services for Wales 1 Contents Report Page Summary 3 1 Introduction 7 Interim Report 8 Recent developments 9 2 Cross-border health services 10 Cross-border flows 10 Primary care 11 Secondary care 11 Tertiary care 11 Devolution and policy divergence 12 The internal market 13 Foundation trusts 13 “Patient voice” and “patient choice” 13 Waiting time targets 14 Free prescriptions 14 Free car parking 15 Performance regime 15 Cross-border problems 16 Access to hospital and specialist services 16 “All-Wales Commissioning” 18 3 Funding and commissioning 21 Commissioning arrangements 22 Funding arrangements 22 Interaction between the two regimes 23 English providers 24 Welsh commissioners 26 Local agreements 30 Effects on patient care 33 Developing a sustainable funding solution 34 The need for governmental involvement 34 Transparency 36 4 Waiting times 36 Different targets 36 Actual waiting times 37 Dealing with different targets 38 Managing two waiting lists 38 The patient’s experience 40 Looking forward 41 5 Patient engagement 41 2 The Provision of cross-border health services for Wales Patient information and engagement services 42 Foundation trusts 42 Patient representation 43 6 ‘Border-proofing’ policy 43 The border as a barrier 43 The need for a permanent protocol 44 7 Conclusion 45 Clinical excellence as close to home as possible 45 Border proofing of policy and practice 46 Cross-border citizen engagement 46 Transparent and accountable co-operation between localities, regions and governments 47 Conclusions and recommendations 48 Introduction 48 Cross-border health services 48 Funding and Commissioning 49 Waiting times 51 Patient engagement 51 ‘Border-proofing’ policy 52 Conclusion 52 List of Reports from the Committee during the current Parliament 60 Formal Minutes 54 Witnesses 55 List of written evidence 56 List of unprinted evidence 59 The Provision of cross-border health services for Wales 3 Summary The border between England and Wales is long and porous and as a result cross-border movements have been a fact of life for many years, including for health services. Given the divergence in health policy between England and Wales, and the significant number of patients who cross the border for treatment, our inquiry examined the interface between the two systems and the effectiveness of co-ordination between the Department for Health and the Welsh Assembly Government. We wanted to discover whether cross-border patients are treated fairly and whether the Welsh Assembly Government and the Department of Health consider the border in the development of the diverging policy environment. We chose to undertake this inquiry because we had heard of significant confusion amongst patients, for example in knowing what they are entitled to receive from their health service. We also heard that cross-border providers were being disadvantaged by the need to cope with two separate funding and commissioning schemes. In July 2008, the Committee published an interim report on the provision of cross-border health services. We felt this was necessary because developments were anticipated in several key areas, including the conclusion of the Steers Review into neuroscience services in Wales; the Welsh Assembly Government’s consultation on the restructuring of the NHS in Wales; and an expected announcement on the establishment of a permanent formal protocol on cross-border health services between the Department of Health and the Welsh Assembly Government, to which we wanted to contribute. Our interim report concluded by recommending that four “key criteria” should be established in cross-border health policy: • Clinical excellence as close to home as possible; • Border-proofing of policy and practice; • Cross-border citizen engagement; and • Transparent and accountable co-operation between localities, regions and governments. This Report returns to these key criteria in the light of developments since we took evidence. Clinical excellence as close to home as possible Cross-border movements between England and Wales have been a fact of life for many years. There is no practical or realistic prospect of diverting these well established cross- border flows, nor would it be desirable to do so. For these reasons, healthcare providers in England and Wales need to maintain close links to ensure that patients receive the treatment they need regardless of their country of residence. This will require commitment and good will from those concerned with policy and delivery by the NHS on either side of the border and a readiness to adapt funding and other arrangements to meet the reality of different bureaucratic processes. Divergent policies must be implemented in a way which accommodates the continuing flow of patients across the Wales-England border. 4 The Provision of cross-border health services for Wales Border proofing of policy and practice There is a clear lack of co-ordination between the UK and the Welsh Assembly Governments. There are potentially serious consequences of leaving individual organisations to cope with the tensions raised by different funding and commissioning arrangements for Welsh and English patients. The opportunity for financial pressure to impact on health service provision must be removed. It is unacceptable that individual providers and commissioners have been left to negotiate ad hoc solutions to problems caused by government-level decisions, apparently taken without regard for their impact on cross-border commissioning. Even where local arrangements work well, patients should not have to rely on the good will of those involved to ensure that their health care pathways are coherent. A solution must involve a sustainable and enforceable long-term agreement between the relevant Ministers and Departments so that future disputes will be avoided. The key test must be whether all parties demonstrably have as their highest priority the need to secure the best possible service for patients. The Committee therefore considers that an improved government-level protocol is essential to standardise and clarify arrangements and accountability mechanisms. We are very disappointed that a permanent protocol on cross-border health services has not been agreed between the Department of Health and the Welsh Assembly Government. We are disturbed by the fact that this has not even been published in draft for consultation. Cross-border citizen engagement Patients on both sides of the border are generally unaware of the potential for divergence between the Welsh and English health services. Better information for patients must be made available, particularly in immediate border areas where the choice of a Welsh or English GP may have implications for later care. The Committee is encouraged by the examples we were given of English hospitals including a cross-border dimension in their management structures. We believe that this model could and should be replicated in all hospitals near the border which serve both English and Welsh patients. We are nevertheless concerned by the anecdotal evidence we have received suggesting that English residents with an interest in Welsh health services may find their engagement in those services limited.
Recommended publications
  • TV Presenter Launches Lily Appeal
    E I D S Morality in the IN financial world explored E6 THE SUNDAY, MARCH 10, 2013 No: 6167 www.churchnewspaper.com PRICE £1.35 1,70j US$2.20 CHURCH OF ENGLAND THE ORIGINAL CHURCH NEWSPAPER ESTABLISHED IN 1828 NEWSPAPER Wakefield rebuffs plan for merger of dioceses FOLLOWING the failure of the Diocese of changed by the proposal. Blackburn will burn has voted. He can allow the plan to go Speaking after votes, Professor Michael Wakefield to approve the plan to replace receive six parishes and Sheffield will to General Synod if he is satisfied that the Clark, chair of the commission that pro- three Yorkshire dioceses with one it falls to receive two parishes if the plan goes ahead. interest of the diocese withholding consent duced the plan said: “It is good to know that the Archbishop of York to decide whether Sheffield Diocese has already signified is so small that it should not prevent the the dioceses of Bradford and Ripon and the proposal should go to General Synod, its agreement and Blackburn Diocese is scheme being referred to General Synod or Leeds support the Commission’s propos- possibly in July. due to vote on 13 April. if he feels there are wider factors affecting als. Looking at the voting in Wakefield, In voting last Saturday both the Diocese The Archbishop of York will not be able the Province or the Church of England as a there is significant support there although of Ripon and Leeds and the Diocese of to announce his decision until after Black- whole that need to be considered.
    [Show full text]
  • Coventry Diocesan Board of Finance Limited
    COVENTRY DIOCESAN BOARD OF FINANCE LIMITED REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS for the year ended 31 December 2016 Company Registered Number: 319482 Registered Charity Number: 247828 COVENTRY DIOCESAN BOARD OF FINANCE LIMITED REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS for the year ended 31 December 2016 Coventry Diocesan Board of Finance Limited: serving the Diocese of Coventry The Diocese of Coventry is one of 42 dioceses in the Church of England. Re-founded in 1918 but with a history dating back to 658, the diocese has an overall population of approximately 900,000 and covers an area of just under 700 square miles, covering Coventry, most of Warwickshire and a small part of Solihull. The diocese is sub-divided into 11 areas called deaneries and, overall, includes 200 parishes. Some parishes have more than one church - the diocese has 238 churches open for public worship. The diocese has one Cathedral – The Cathedral Church of St Michael, Coventry. Each diocese is led by a Diocesan Bishop. The Right Reverend Doctor Christopher Cocksworth became Bishop of Coventry in 2008. Shortly after his installation he re-affirmed the diocesan mission as one of worshipping God, making new disciples and transforming communities. The diocesan strategy to achieve this is by focussing on eight qualities essential for healthy growing churches: empowering leadership; gift-orientated ministry; passionate spirituality; inspiring worship; holistic small groups; need-orientated outreach; loving relationships; and functional structures. The Coventry Diocesan Board of Finance Limited (“the DBF”) was established under the Diocesan Boards of Finance Measure 1925 and is both a company limited by guarantee and a registered charity.
    [Show full text]
  • Churchof England
    THE Bishops take the knee BISHOPS across the country led Angli- The Rt Rev Guli Francis-Dehqani, said: cans in ‘taking the knee’ to mark the “We must stand up and share our abhorrence death of American George Floyd and to of that racist brutality but also act in our own CHURCHOF highlight injustice in British society. areas to address the culture of discrimination The Bishop of Leicester, the Rt Rev Martyn we live in this society too.” Snow, led others in kneeling for eight min- Meanwhile the Bishop of Coventry, the Rt utes and 46 seconds, the length of time that a Rev Dr Christopher Cocksworth, and the ENGLAND US police officer knelt on Mr Floyd’s neck. Bishop of Warwick, the Rt Rev John Stroyan Bishop Snow said: “I am deeply shocked by ‘took the knee’ in front of the Charred Cross the appalling brutality we have seen against in the Cathedral Ruins. Newspaper black people in America and I stand along- In Manchester hundreds of people joined side those who are suffering and peacefully in a ‘Protest through Prayer’ event as a form calling for urgent change, as well as commit- of action in solidarity with #BlackLivesMatter ting to make changes in our own lives and organised by the Archdeacon of Manchester. the institutions we are part of. This week the Archbishop of Canterbury 12 June, 2020 “Structural and systemic racial prejudice said: “The racism that people in this country £1.50 exists across societies and institutions and experience is horrifying. The Church has No: 6539 we must act to change that, as well as failed here, and still does, and it’s clear what Established in 1828 addressing our own unconscious biases that Jesus commands us to do: repent and take lead us to discriminate against others.” Earli- action.” er this year he led the General Synod in a Download our App on vote to apologise for racism in the Church.
    [Show full text]
  • Coventry Diocesan Board of Finance Limited
    COVENTRY DIOCESAN BOARD OF FINANCE LIMITED REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS for the year ended 31 December 2014 Company Registered Number: 319482 Registered Charity Number: 247828 COVENTRY DIOCESAN BOARD OF FINANCE LIMITED REPORT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS for the year ended 31 December 2014 Coventry Diocesan Board of Finance Limited: serving the Diocese of Coventry The Diocese of Coventry is one of 42 dioceses in the Church of England. Re-founded in 1918 but with a history dating back to 658, the diocese has an overall population of approximately 820,000 and covers an area of just under 700 square miles, covering Coventry, most of Warwickshire and a small part of Solihull. The diocese is sub-divided into 11 areas called deaneries and, overall, includes 199 parishes. Some parishes have more than one church - the diocese has 238 churches open for public worship. The diocese has one Cathedral – The Cathedral Church of St Michael, Coventry. Each diocese is led by a Diocesan Bishop. The Right Reverend Doctor Christopher Cocksworth became Bishop of Coventry in 2008. Shortly after his installation he re-affirmed the diocesan mission as one of worshipping God, making new disciples and transforming communities. The diocesan strategy to achieve this is by focussing on eight essential qualities of healthy growing churches: empowering leadership; gift-orientated ministry; passionate spirituality; inspiring worship; holistic small groups; need-orientated outreach; loving relationships; and functional structures. The Coventry Diocesan Board of Finance Limited (“the DBF”) was established under the Diocesan Boards of Finance Measure 1925 and is both a company limited by guarantee and a registered charity.
    [Show full text]
  • Nazareth Is the School of Initiation Into the Understanding of the Life of Jesus
    Benedictine Monks Holy Cross Monastery 119 Kilbroney Road Rostrevor Co. Down BT34 3BN Northern Ireland Tel: 028 4173 9979 [email protected] www.benedictinemonks.co.uk Facebook: Benedictine Monks Rostrevor Twitter: @rostrevormonks Christmas 2017 (Letter n°55) “For the grace of God has appeared, bringing salvation to all, training us to renounce impiety and worldly passions, and in the present age to live lives that are self-controlled, upright and godly. (Titus 2:11-12) We invite you to reflect on an extract from a speech given by Blessed Paul VI while on his journey in the Holy Land. On Sunday 5 January 1964, he visited the Basilica of the Annunciation in Nazareth and declared: Nazareth is the school of initiation into the understanding of the life of Jesus. It is the school of the gospel. Here one learns to observe, to listen, to meditate, to penetrate into the profound and mysterious meaning of that simple, humble, lovely apparition of God among men. Here one learns almost imperceptibly to imitate Him. Here one learns the way by which we can enter into the under- standing of Christ. Here one understands the need of observing the setting of His dealings with us: the places, the time, the customs, the language, the religious atmosphere — all of which Jesus used to reveal Himself to the world. (…) It is here, in this school, that one comes to grasp how necessary it is to be spiritually disciplined, if one wishes to follow the teachings of the gospel and to become a follower of Christ. Oh, how we would like to become children again and to return to learn our lessons in this humble, and yet sublime school of Nazareth.
    [Show full text]
  • Prayer Diary at 6Pm on Sunday 31St May, the Diocese of Coventry Hosted a Virtual Pentecost Praise Service Called 2020 Spirit Vision
    2020 Spirit Vision Prayer Diary At 6pm on Sunday 31st May, the Diocese of Coventry hosted a virtual Pentecost Praise service called 2020 Spirit Vision. July 2020 The service premiered on the diocesan ‘Our Father in heaven, hallowed be your name, your kingdom come, your will be done, on YouTube channel and Coventry Cathedral's earth as in heaven. Give us today our daily bread. Forgive us our sins as we forgive those Facebook page and featured many who sin against us. Lead us not into temptation but deliver us from evil. For the kingdom, different people from churches across the the power, and the glory are yours now and for ever. Amen.’ diocese. The Dean of Coventry, John Witcombe introduced the service, with Laura Seago, I’ve relied on the Lord’s Prayer during this time of lockdown. It’s sustained me in my own churchwarden at St Mark's Fleknoe, and the Revd Alison Evans, Vicar of Holy Trinity, times of prayer and I’ve found myself leading others in praying the Lord’s Prayer at Attleborough, presenting. almost every meeting that I’ve led on Zoom. There was worship led by Coventry Cathedral Chorus, St Mark's Coventry and a special Every phrase has taken on a poignancy and power that seems to address the exact rendition of Bethel Worship's 'Spirit Move' by churches from across the diocese. conditions in which we find ourselves. Now has most certainly been the time to pray for Bishop Christopher and Bishop John both spoke and prayers were led by the Offchurch God’s kingdom to come, for God’s will for peace, healing and hope to be done on earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Friends of Holland House
    Contact Friends of Holland The Friends of Holland House support the House via Holland House ministry of the House, its Trustees, Warden or and Staff through counsel, prayer, financial [email protected] support and practical assistance See the latest news of the New Year 2019 Friends of Holland House Friends on the House Be a Friend to Holland House website: www.hollandhouse.org • Come along to programme events - look out for some new opportuni- The Friends of Holland House support the ministry of the House, its ties this year. Click on About for the Trustees, Warden and Staff through counsel, prayer, financial support and Friends’ pages • Wear one of the Friends of Holland House badges (available from Re- practical assistance ception) when you are in the House and tell others about us • Sign up for a poster to display in your church or organisation See page 3 for Friends • Volunteer at Holland House - see the Friends’ pages on the website for Weekend 2019 details Bishop Robert in Conversation with…….. suggestions Friday 3rd May— HOLLAND HOUSE • Remember the staff and all who visit Holland House in your prayers Sunday 5th of May The new year sees the beginning of an POP-UPS Welcome to … 2019 exciting new programme of events at WHAT’S ON AT HOLLAND HOUSE? Look out for ‘Pop-up’ events at Holland House— Holland House including Friends’ Bishops in Friday 18th January Friendly Lunch and Talk : Bellringing in English History and Literature with Tim Keyes, these are advertised on Chair, Bishop Robert Patterson, sitting email, FaceBook, Twitter Conversation 12 noon, £16 and the HH website - down in conversation with eight including PUR—Pop-up Church of England Bishops.
    [Show full text]
  • Archdeacon Missioner in the Diocese of Coventry Role Information Pack Contents
    Y R T N E V O C F O E DIOCES Archdeacon Missioner in the Diocese of Coventry Role Information Pack Contents Introduction by the Bishop of Coventry Context 1. The Diocese of Coventry 2. Diocesan Vision and Strategy 3. Recent developments and future aspirations 4. The Archdeacons The Archdeacon Missioner 1. The Person 2. The Role 3. Key relationships 4. The Person Specification Terms and Conditions Further Information Appendices 1. Strategy document – Whole Diocese 2. Natural Church Development 3. Terms and conditions Introduction by the Bishop of Coventry Thank you for your interest in this post of Archdeacon Missioner in the Diocese of Coventry. I’ve been here eleven years now, and I love it. I think it’s an ideal size and shape for a Diocese, with a fascinating variety of missionary contexts, and a deep spiritual lineage stretching back to the 12th Century, when the Diocese of Lichfield relocated to Coventry. We were re-founded in 1918 when Europe was still at war, with a vision to ‘bring people to Christ’. That theme of the light of the gospel bringing hope in times of despair returned powerfully in 1940 when the Cathedral was bombed and the Diocese, led by the Cathedral’s ministry, committed itself to building a ‘kinder, simpler – a more Christ-Child-like sort of world’1. Here we are now in the 21st Century carrying on the community. Our strategy is to build up the health of the church same apostolic mission – the message and ministry of so that we will see the growth of the church, and to do that reconciliation, as Paul puts it (2 Corinthians 5.16-21) – across the Whole Diocese of church communities, church among the people of Coventry, most of Warwickshire and schools, Christian chaplaincies and the Cathedral.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anglican Church
    The Anglican Church Investigation Report October 2020 2020 The Anglican Church Safeguarding in the Church of England and the Church in Wales Investigation Report October 2020 A report of the Inquiry Panel Professor Alexis Jay OBE Professor Sir Malcolm Evans KCMG OBE Ivor Frank Drusilla Sharpling CBE © Crown copyright 2020 The text of this document (this excludes, where present, the Royal Arms and all departmental or agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium provided that it is reproduced accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the document title specified. Where third‑party material has been identified, permission from the respective copyright holder must be sought. Any enquiries related to this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] or Freepost IICSA INDEPENDENT INQUIRY. This publication is available at https://www.iicsa.org.uk/publications CCS0620778888 10/20 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled‑fibre content minimum. Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. Contents Executive Summary v Pen portraits ix Part A: Introduction 1 A.1: Background to the investigation 2 A.2: The Church of England 2 A.3: The Church in Wales 6 A.4: Methodology 7 A.5: Terminology 10 A.6: References 11 Part B: The Church of England 13 B.1: Safeguarding in the Church of England 14 B.1.1: Introduction 14 B.1.2: Safeguarding structures 15 B.1.3: Safeguarding policies 25 B.1.4: Safeguarding in recruitment
    [Show full text]
  • MS 254 A980 Women's Campaign for Soviet Jewry 1
    1 MS 254 A980 Women’s Campaign for Soviet Jewry 1 Administrative papers Parliamentary Correspondence Correspondence with Members of Parliament 1/1/1 Members of Parliament correspondence regarding support for the 1978-95 efforts of the Women’s Campaign for Soviet Jewry and brief profiles and contact details for individual Members of Parliament; Diane Abbot, Robert Adley, Jonathan Aitken, Richard Alexander, Michael Alison, Graham Allen, David Alton, David Amess, Donald Anderson, Hilary Armstrong, Jacques Arnold, Tom Arnold, David Ashby, Paddy Ashdown, Joe Ashton, Jack Aspinwall, Robert Atkins, and David Atkinson 1/1/2 Members of Parliament correspondence regarding support for the 1974-93 efforts of the Women’s Campaign for Soviet Jewry and brief profiles and contact details for individual Members of Parliament; Kenneth Baker, Nicholas Baker, Tony Baldry, Robert Banks, Tony Banks, Kevin Barron, Spencer Batiste and J. D. Battle 1/1/3 Members of Parliament correspondence regarding support for the 1974-93 efforts of the Women’s Campaign for Soviet Jewry and brief profiles and contact details for individual Members of Parliament; Margaret Beckett, Roy Beggs, Alan James Beith, Stuart Bell, Henry Bellingham, Vivian Bendall, Tony Benn, Andrew F. Bennett, Gerald Bermingham, John Biffen, John Blackburn, Anthony Blair, David Blunkett, Paul Boateng, Richard Body, Hartley Booth, Nichol Bonsor, Betty Boothroyd, Tim Boswell and Peter Bottomley 1/1/4 Members of Parliament correspondence regarding support for the 1975-94 efforts of the Women’s Campaign
    [Show full text]
  • Anglican Church Case Studies: Chichester/Peter Ball: Investigation Report
    The Anglican Church Case 2. 1. The Studies: response The Chichester, Diocese allegations of to against Peter The Anglican Church Case Studies: 1. The Diocese of Chichester 2. The response to allegations against Peter Ball Investigation Report May 2019 Ball Investigation Report Investigation May 2019 May 2019 The Anglican Church Case Studies: 1. The Diocese of Chichester 2. The response to allegations against Peter Ball Investigation Report May 2019 A report of the Inquiry Panel Professor Alexis Jay OBE Professor Sir Malcolm Evans KCMG OBE Ivor Frank Drusilla Sharpling CBE © Crown copyright 2019 The text of this document (this excludes, where present, the Royal Arms and all departmental or agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium provided that it is reproduced accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the document title specified. Where third‑party material has been identified, permission from the respective copyright holder must be sought. Any enquiries related to this publication should be sent to us at [email protected] or Freepost IICSA INDEPENDENT INQUIRY. This publication is available at https://www.iicsa.org.uk/reports ISBN 978‑1‑5286‑1213‑5 CCS0319896362 05/19 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled‑fibre content minimum. Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. The following corrections were made to the report on 9 May 2019: Page iii: 18 updated to 20. Page 206: Recommendation 4 was updated to make it clear that it refers to individuals engaged in regulated activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Porvoo Prayer Diary 2013
    Porvoo Prayer Diary 2013 JANUARY • 6/1 - Chichester (Bishop Martin Warner, Bishop Mark Sowerby, vacancy), Mikkeli (Bishop Seppo Häkkinen) • 13/1 – Ely (Bishop Stephen Conway, Bishop David Thomson), Nidaros/ New see (Bishop Helga Haugland Byfuglien, presiding bishop) • 20/1 - Oulu (Bishop Samuel Salmi), Soer-Hålogaland (Bodoe) (Bishop Tor Berger Joergensen), Coventry (Bishop Chris Cocksworth, Bishop John Stroyan) • 27/1 - Tampere (Bishop Matti Repo), Manchester (Bishop Nigel McCulloch - retiring January 2013, Bishop Chris Edmondson, Bishop Mark Davies) FEBRUARY • 3/2 - Birmingham (Bishop David Urquhart, Bishop Andrew Watson), Cork Cloyne and Ross (Bishop Paul Colton), Elsinore (Bishop Lise-Lotte Rebel) • 10/2 - Bangor (Bishop Andrew John), Dublin and Glendalough (Archbishop Michael Jackson) • 17/2 - Worcester (Bishop John Inge, Bishop David Walker), Hamar (Bishop Solveig Fiske) • 24/2 - Bradford (Bishop Nicholas Baines), Limerick and Killaloe (Bishop Trevor Williams), Roskilde (Bishop Peter Fischer-Moeller) MARCH • 3/3 - Peterborough (Bishop Donald Allister, Bishop John Holbrook), Meath and Kildare (vacancy) • 10/3 – Canterbury (Archbishop Justin Welby, Bishop Trevor Willmott), Down and Dromore (Bishop Harold Miller) • 17/3 - Chelmsford (Bishop Stephen Cottrell, Bishop David Hawkins, Bishop John Wraw, Bishop Christopher Morgan), Karlstad (Bishop Esbjorn Hagberg) • 24/3 - Latvia (Archbishop Janis Vanags, Bishop Einars Alpe, Bishop Pavils Bruvers), Lichfield (Bishop Jonathan Gledhill, Bishop Mark Rylands, Bishop Geoff Annas, Bishop Clive
    [Show full text]