Pain When It Matters Most

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pain When It Matters Most KHCHA Annual Meeting 9/20/18 - Workshop H2 Transitions in Life Managing Pain When it Matters Most Michael F Dandurand PharmD, BCGP, FACA Objective ● Intro to pain ● Assessment ● Principles of pain control ● Opioid analgesics 1 Pain ● Occurs 70% of patients with cancer ● Occurs 65% of patients with non- malignant disease Definition ● “Pain is an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage or described in terms of such damage.”- International Association for the Study of Pain' ● Whatever the patient says it is! 2 Types of Pain ● Nociceptive o Specific pain receptors are stimulated o Includes somatic and visceral ● Neuropathic o No specific receptors stimulated o AKA nerve pain o Burning and electrical feel Pain Tolerance Lowered by: ● Discomfort ● Boredom ● Insomnia ● Sadness ● Fatigue ● Depression ● Anxiety ● Introversion ● Fear ● Social abandonment ● Anger ● Mental isolation 3 Pain Tolerance Raised by: ● Relief of symptoms ● Sleep ● Elevation of mood ● Rest or physiotherapy ● Finding meaning and ● Relaxation therapy significance ● Explanation/support ● Social inclusion ● Understanding/empathy ● Support to express ● Diversion emotions Pain Assessment ● Patient is central to pain assessment ● Diagnose the cause of pain ● Take detailed history of the pain ● Use patient self-assessment 4 Pain Scales healthonecares.com Regular monitoring with: queri.research.va.gov ● Visual analogues scales ● Numerical scales ● Wong-Baker Faces Pain Scale WHO Analgesic Ladder Step 1 (pain less than 3/10) Step 2 (pain 3-6/10) Step 3 (pain over 6/10) ntnu.edu 5 WHO Analgesic Ladder ● Start at step according to pain severity ● Choose drug based pain severity, not disease stage ● Use strong opioids when steps 1 and 2 analgesics fail ● Choose analgesic of different potency if pain relief failed ● Treat moderate-to-severe pain with opioid analgesics Adjuvant Analgesics Adjuvant analgesics can be added at any stage Drugs Indication NSAID ● Bone pain ● Soft tissue infiltration ● Hepatomegaly Corticosteroids ● Raised intracranial pressure ● Soft tissue infiltration ● Nerve compression ● Hepatomegaly ●Bone Pain Antidepressants and Anticonvulsants ● Nerve compression or infiltration ● Paraneoplastic neuropathies Ketamine (special use only) ● Refractory pain ●Neuropathic pain ● Ischaemic limb pain 6 Pain Management Principles ● Goal: patients pain free at rest and during activity ● Analgesics scheduled, not PRN in continuous pain ● Pain is easier to prevent than relieve ● Additional pain medication prior to activity ● Simplest regimen, least drugs used, appropriate form, and interval ● Ensure treatment goals regularly ● Provide patient information about treatment ● Encourage patient involvement 1st-line Treatment Recommendations ● Oral sustained-release morphine for maintenance in patients requiring strong opiates ● Transdermal patches not for first line ● If patient’s pain cannot be controlled with first line therapy after optimization, revise treatment 7 1st-line Treatment for Breakthrough Pain ● Offer immediate-release morphine, if tolerable ● Fentanyl not for first-line rescue medication timeinc.net 1st-line Treatment Recommendations: Transdermal When oral option is intolerable ● Transdermal Options: Fentanyl and Buprenorphine ● Use lowest cost transdermal patches ● Initiate after patient’s pain stabilize, due to long titration period ● Convert opiate doses with caution 8 1st line Recommendations: Subcutaneous When oral opioids are not tolerable: ● Use subcutaneous opioids with the lowest cost Sample Options: ● Morphine ● Hydromorphone ● Fentanyl Opioids Potency Effect of Opioid Receptors Weak Opioids Pure agonists Partial Agonist Codeine Morphine Buprenorphine Meperidine HYdromorphone Oxymorphone Oxycodone Fentanyl Methadone Strong Opioids Agonist-antagonist Pure Antagonists Morphine Pentazocine Naloxone Hydromorphone Nalbuphine Naltrexone Oxymorphone Butorphanol Methylnaltrexone Oxycodone Fentanyl Methadone 9 Codeine ● Mild-to-moderate pain treatment ● Weak affinity for opioid receptor ● About 10 percent metabolized to morphine ● Available as single and in combination with acetaminophen or aspirin ● Also indicated as antitussive Tramadol ● Binds weakly to opioid receptors, inhibit uptake of serotonin and norepinephrine, and promotes serotonin release ● Caution with other serotonin uptake inhibitors ● Available as combination with acetaminophen or single agent as immediate or long-acting 10 Hydrocodone ● Similar structure to codeine ● Weakly binds to opioid receptor ● Moderate-to-severe pain ● Commercially available as combination Meperidine ● Synthetic opioid ● Less potent, shorter duration of action than morphine ● Seizure risk ● Not for long term, elderly, or renally impaired patients 11 Morphine ● Backbone of first-line therapy ● Standard of opioid comparison ● Moderate-to-severe pain ● Available in multiple formulations Misconceptions of Morphine Explained Patients normally believe: ● It is very addictive ● Respiratory depression issue ● Significant tolerance develops ● Morphine is stupefying 12 Recommendations for Starting Morphine ● Initiate 4-hourly doses of normal-release morphine tablets or elixir ● Allow extra doses for “breakthrough pain” PRN ● After 24 hours, total the day’s intake and divide by 6 to get the dose for every 4 hours. ● Regular starting dose for 4-hourly is 5-10 mg morphine Maintenance dose of Morphine ● After pain stabilized, use sustained release preparations ● Breakthrough pain not associated with unusual acvity should be treated with morphine at ⅙ total daily dose 13 Oxycodone ● 25-50% more potent than morphine ● Oral only ● Available in combinations with acetaminophen, ibuprofen, and aspirin ● Immediate and long-acting available Hydromorphone ● Semisynthetic derivative of morphine ● 7-11 times more potent than morphine ● Oral and parenteral 14 Oxymorphone ● Active metabolite of oxycodone ● More potent than oxycodone ● 10 times more potent than morphine ● Oral and parenteral available ● Immediate and long-acting available Methadone ● Synthetic opioid receptor agonist, NMDA receptor blocker, serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor ● Long half-life (8-59 hours) ● Opioid withdrawal treatment ● Has effect on neuropathic pain ● Effective for acute pain, but used primarily for chronic cancer and noncancer pain 15 Dosing Methadone: Opioid Naive Patient Gradual Titration Initiation ● 2.5 mg every 8 hours ● Slowly titrate to effect Faster Titration Initiation ● 2.5 mg every 6-8 hours ● Slowly titrate to effect ● These recommendations represent a conservative approach Methadone Conversion Table Daily Oral Morphine Dose Ratio Estimated Methadone <100 mg 3:1 20-30% 100-300 mg 5:1 10-20% 300-600 mg 10:1 8-12% 600-1,000 mg 12:1 5-10% >1,000 mg 20:1 5% 16 Methadone Conversion Example 1 ● Oral morphine dose: 80 mg daily ● Calculated Methadone dose: 15 mg daily 80*20%=16 mg ● Initial Methadone dose: 5 mg q8h 15 mg/3=5 mg ● Increase by calculated MET dose every 5-7 days PRN Example 2 ● Oral morphine dose: 300 mg daily ● Calculated methadone: 30 mg daily 300*10%=30 mg ● Initiate methadone dose: 10 mg q8h 30 mg/3=10 mg ● Increase by calculated MET dose every 5-7 days PRN 17 Daily Oral Morphine Exceeding 500 mg Example 3 ● For morphine doses greater than 500 mg daily; add a third of the calculated methadone dose every 5 days Example: ● Oral morphine dose: 600 mg daily ● Calculated methadone: 42 mg daily 600*7%=42 mg methadone ● 1st 5 days: 5 mg methadone q8h and 400 mg morphine (in divided doses) (⅓)*42=14 mg, next closest dose is 15 mg, 15/3=5 mg q8h, 600 mg*(⅔)=400 mg ● Next 5 days: 10 mg methadone q8h, 200 mg morphine (in divided doses) 42*(⅔)=28, next closest dose is 30 mg, 30/3=10 mg q8h, 600*(⅓)=200 mg ● Then 15 mg methadone q8h, no morphine Changing Methadone Dosing Interval ● Determine daily dosage for adequate analgesia ● Trial of longer dosing intervals may be attempted ● When patients are stable, divide total daily dose into every 12 hours 18 Buprenorphine Transdermal Patch ● Opioid partial agonist and antagonist ● Ceiling analgesia and respiratory depression ● Drug half-life is 30 hours ● Can displace pure agonist such as morphine and induce withdrawal Buprenorphine Conversion ● Available as Butrans 5, 7.5, 10, 15, and 20 mcg/hour Patch Strength Morphine Equivalent Butrans 5 mcg Oral Morphine less than 30 mg/ 24 hours Butrans 10 mcg Oral Morphine 30 mg-80 mg/ 24 hours Butrans may not be Oral Morphine over 80 mg/24 hours appropriate for pain relief, use alternate analgesic Manufacturer Recommendations 19 Starting Buprenorphine ● Opioid naive: 5 mcg/hr patch, titrate up as necessary ● Previously on opioid: Find equivalent converted dose ● Begin weekly with breakthrough pain meds PRN ● Dose adjustments: recommend after 7 days; not more frequently than 3 days ● Maximum dose: 20 mcg/hr patch ● Doses ≥40 mcg/hr may be associated with QT prolongation Fentanyl ● Synthetic opioid ● 100 times more potent than morphine ● Transdermal patch for moderate-severe pain ● Transmucosal(lozenge, sublingual) for breakthrough pain 20 Fentanyl Transdermal Patch ● Onset 6-12 hours ● Steady state achieved after 3-6 days ● Change patch every 72 hours Fentanyl Conversion Methods FDA Manufacturing Label Breitbart Method ● The manufacturer recommendation is a ● Brietbart recommended ratio of 2:1 very conservative approach and often ● 2 mg oral morphine/24 hr = 1 mcg/hr undertreats pain of transdermal fentanyl ● Example: Patient on 145 mg oral morphine/day would use a 75 mcg/hr fentanyl patch ● Brietbart
Recommended publications
  • A Phase I Trial of Tamoxifen with Ribociclib (LEE011) in Adult Patients with Advanced ER+ (HER2 Negative) Breast Cancer
    The TEEL Study: A Phase I Trial of Tamoxifen with Ribociclib (LEE011) in Adult Patients with Advanced ER+ (HER2 Negative) Breast Cancer NCT02586675 Version 12.0 September 14, 2016 TEEL Protocol- Tamoxifen +Ribociclib Page 1 TITLE PAGE The TEEL Study: A Phase I trial of Tamoxifen with Ribociclib (LEE011) in adult patients with advanced ER+ (HER2 negative) breast cancer. Protocol: MCC 18332 Chesapeake IRB Pro00015228 Principal Investigator: Co-Investigators: Statistician: Experimental Therapeutics Program H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center 12902 Magnolia Drive Tampa, FL 33612 & Comprehensive Breast Program Moffitt McKinley Outpatient Center 10920 N. McKinley Dr. Tampa, FL 33612 Study Site Contact: Protocol Version 12 Date: September 14, 2016 TEEL Protocol- Tamoxifen +Ribociclib Page 2 TITLE PAGE .............................................................................................................................................. 1 SYNOPSIS ................................................................................................................................................... 5 Patient Population ................................................................................................................................. 5 Type of Study ......................................................................................................................................... 5 Prior Therapy......................................................................................................................................... 5
    [Show full text]
  • Preventive Report Appendix
    Title Authors Published Journal Volume Issue Pages DOI Final Status Exclusion Reason Nasal sumatriptan is effective in treatment of migraine attacks in children: A Ahonen K.; Hamalainen ML.; Rantala H.; 2004 Neurology 62 6 883-7 10.1212/01.wnl.0000115105.05966.a7 Deemed irrelevant in initial screening Seasonal variation in migraine. Alstadhaug KB.; Salvesen R.; Bekkelund SI. Cephalalgia : an 2005 international journal 25 10 811-6 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2005.01018.x Deemed irrelevant in initial screening Flunarizine, a calcium channel blocker: a new prophylactic drug in migraine. Amery WK. 1983 Headache 23 2 70-4 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1983.hed2302070 Deemed irrelevant in initial screening Monoamine oxidase inhibitors in the control of migraine. Anthony M.; Lance JW. Proceedings of the 1970 Australian 7 45-7 Deemed irrelevant in initial screening Prostaglandins and prostaglandin receptor antagonism in migraine. Antonova M. 2013 Danish medical 60 5 B4635 Deemed irrelevant in initial screening Divalproex extended-release in adolescent migraine prophylaxis: results of a Apostol G.; Cady RK.; Laforet GA.; Robieson randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. WZ.; Olson E.; Abi-Saab WM.; Saltarelli M. 2008 Headache 48 7 1012-25 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2008.01081.x Deemed irrelevant in initial screening Divalproex sodium extended-release for the prophylaxis of migraine headache in Apostol G.; Lewis DW.; Laforet GA.; adolescents: results of a stand-alone, long-term open-label safety study. Robieson WZ.; Fugate JM.; Abi-Saab WM.; 2009 Headache 49 1 45-53 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2008.01279.x Deemed irrelevant in initial screening Safety and tolerability of divalproex sodium extended-release in the prophylaxis of Apostol G.; Pakalnis A.; Laforet GA.; migraine headaches: results of an open-label extension trial in adolescents.
    [Show full text]
  • Title 16. Crimes and Offenses Chapter 13. Controlled Substances Article 1
    TITLE 16. CRIMES AND OFFENSES CHAPTER 13. CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES ARTICLE 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS § 16-13-1. Drug related objects (a) As used in this Code section, the term: (1) "Controlled substance" shall have the same meaning as defined in Article 2 of this chapter, relating to controlled substances. For the purposes of this Code section, the term "controlled substance" shall include marijuana as defined by paragraph (16) of Code Section 16-13-21. (2) "Dangerous drug" shall have the same meaning as defined in Article 3 of this chapter, relating to dangerous drugs. (3) "Drug related object" means any machine, instrument, tool, equipment, contrivance, or device which an average person would reasonably conclude is intended to be used for one or more of the following purposes: (A) To introduce into the human body any dangerous drug or controlled substance under circumstances in violation of the laws of this state; (B) To enhance the effect on the human body of any dangerous drug or controlled substance under circumstances in violation of the laws of this state; (C) To conceal any quantity of any dangerous drug or controlled substance under circumstances in violation of the laws of this state; or (D) To test the strength, effectiveness, or purity of any dangerous drug or controlled substance under circumstances in violation of the laws of this state. (4) "Knowingly" means having general knowledge that a machine, instrument, tool, item of equipment, contrivance, or device is a drug related object or having reasonable grounds to believe that any such object is or may, to an average person, appear to be a drug related object.
    [Show full text]
  • Suspension D'amm Des Médicaments Par Voie Orale Contenant
    INFORMATION TRANSMISE SOUS L’AUTORITE DE L’ANSM Lettre aux professionnels de Santé Septembre 2013 Communication aux professionnels de santé concernant les restrictions d’indications des médicaments par voie orale contenant : dihydroergotamine, dihydroergocristine, dihydroergocryptine-caféine, nicergoline A destination des : neurologues, ophtalmologistes, cardiologues, chirurgiens vasculaires, phlébologues, angéiologues, gériatres, médecins généralistes, pharmaciens (ville + hôpital) , CRPV Madame, Monsieur, Cher Confrère, En accord avec l’Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des produits de santé (ANSM) et l’Agence européenne du médicament (EMA), nous vous informons que les médicaments contenant de la dihydroergotamine, de la dihydroergocristine, de la dihydroergocryptine-caféine ou de la nicergoline ne devront plus être utilisés dans les indications suivantes : Dihydroergotamine (SEGLOR, TAMIK, IKARAN, DIHYDROERGOTAMINE AMDIPHARM): • Traitement de fond de la migraine. • Traitement de l’hypotension orthostatique. • Amélioration des symptômes en rapport avec l'insuffisance veinolymphatique (jambes lourdes, douleurs, impatience du primo-decubitus). Dihydroergocristine (ISKEDYL): • Traitement à visée symptomatique du déficit pathologique cognitif et neurosensoriel chronique du sujet âgé (à l’exclusion de la maladie d’Alzheimer et des autres démences). • Traitement d’appoint des baisses d’acuité visuelle et troubles présumés du champ visuel d’origine vasculaire. • Rétinopathies aigües d’origine vasculaire Dihydroergocryptine-caféine (VASOBRAL) : • Traitement d'appoint à visée symptomatique du déficit pathologique cognitif et neurosensoriel chronique du sujet âgé (à l'exclusion de la maladie d'Alzheimer et des autres démences). • Traitement d'appoint du syndrome de Raynaud. Nicergoline (SERMION, NICERGOLINE BIOGARAN, NICERGOLINE EG, NICERGOLINE MYLAN, NICERGOLINE TEVA): • Traitement d'appoint à visée symptomatique du déficit pathologique cognitif et neurosensoriel chronique du sujet âgé (à l'exclusion de la maladie d'Alzheimer et des autres démences).
    [Show full text]
  • United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 6,060,499 Plachetka (45) Date of Patent: *May 9, 2000
    US006060499A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 6,060,499 Plachetka (45) Date of Patent: *May 9, 2000 54). ANTI-MIGRAINE METHODS AND Centonze, “Evaluation of the efficacy of oral Sumatriptan in COMPOSITIONS USING 5-HTAGONSTS the management of migraine attacks. Clinical Results' WITH LONG-ACTING NSAIDS (1995) La Clinica Teraputica, vol. 146(11), 721-728 (Article in the Italian language, Citation to English language 75 Inventor: John R. Plachetka, Chapel Hill, N.C. abstract only at 727). Dechant, “Sumatriptan. A review of its Pharmacodynamic 73 Assignee: Pozen, Inc., Chapel Hill, N.C. Properties, and Therapeutic Efficacy in the Acute Treatment of Migraine and Cluster Headache” (1992) Drugs, vol. 43(5) * Notice: This patent is Subject to a terminal dis 776-798. claimer. Klapper, “Toward a Standard Drug Formulary for the Treat ment of Headache” (1995) Headache, Apr., 1995, 225-227. 21 Appl. No.: 09/151,912 Oral Sumatriptan Group, “Sumatriptan-An Oral Dose-de fining Study” (1991) Eur: Neurol., vol. 31, 300–305. 22 Filed: Sep. 11, 1998 Thomson, “A Study to Compare Oral Sumatriptan with Oral Aspirin plus Oral Metoclopramide in the Acute Treatment of Related U.S. Application Data Migraine” (1992) Eur: Neurol., vol. 32, 177-184. 62 Division of application No. 08/907,826, Aug. 14, 1997, Pat. Todd, "Naproxen A reappraisal of its Pharmacology, and No. 5,872,145. Therapeutic Use in Rheumatic Diseases and pain States' 60 Provisional application No. 60/024,129, Aug. 16, 1996. (1990) Drugs, vol. 40(1), 91-137. Tokola, “Effects of migraine attack and metoclopramide on (51) Int.
    [Show full text]
  • French Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Migraine in Adults and Children
    French Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Migraine in Adults and Children Gilles Gkraud, MD,l Michel Lank-i-Minet, MD,’ Christian Lucas, MD,3 and Dominique Valade, MD,4 on behalf of the French Society for the Study of Migraine Headache (SFEMC) lDepartment of Neurology, Rangueil Hospital, Toulouse, 2Pain Centel; Pasteur Hospital, Nice, 3Depurtment of Neurology, Sulengro Hospital, Lille, and 4Heuduche Emergency Centel; Lur-iboisi&e Hospital, Paris, France ABSTRACT Background: The French Recommendations for Clinical Practice: Diagnosis and Therapy of Migraine are guidelines concerning the overall management of patients with migraine, including diagnostic and therapeutic strategies and assessment of disability Objective: This article summarizes the guidelines as they apply to adults and children, and proposes future direction for steps toward optimal treatment of migraine in patients in France. Methods: The recommendations were categorized into 3 levels of proof (A-C) according to the National Agency for Accreditation and Evaluation in Health (ANAES) methodology and were based on a professional consensus reached among members of the Working Group and the Guidelines Review Group of the ANAES. Results: The International Headache Society diagnostic criteria for migraine should be used in routine clinical practice. Recommended agents for the treatment of migraine in adults include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) monotherapy or in combination with metoclopramide, acetaminophen monotherapy, triptans, ergotamine tartrate, and dihydroergotamine mesylate. Patients should use the medication as early as possible after the onset of migraine headache. For migraine prophylaxis in adults, the following can be used: propranolol, metoprolol, oxetorone, or amitriptyline as first-line treatment, and pizotifen, flunarizine, valproate sodium, or topiramate as second-line treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • Dihydroergocryptine/Caffeine
    27 September 2013 EMA/750625/2013 Assessment report Ergot derivatives containing medicinal products International Non-proprietary Name: dihydroergocryptine/caffeine Procedure number: EMEA/H/A-31/1325 Referral under Article 31 of Directive 2001/83/EC Note Assessment report as adopted by the CHMP with all information of a commercially confidential nature deleted. 7 Westferry Circus ● Canary Wharf ● London E14 4HB ● United Kingdom Telephone +44 (0)20 7418 8400 Facsimile +44 (0)20 7418 8416 E -mail [email protected] Website www.ema.europa.eu An agency of the European Union © European Medicines Agency, 2014. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Table of contents 1. Background information on the procedure .............................................. 3 1.1. Referral of the matter to the CHMP ......................................................................... 3 2. Scientific discussion ................................................................................ 3 2.1. Introduction......................................................................................................... 3 2.2. Clinical efficacy .................................................................................................... 3 2.2.1. Results ............................................................................................................. 4 2.2.2. Discussion ........................................................................................................ 6 2.3. Clinical safety .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2004/0132780 A1 Allen Et Al
    US 2004O132780A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2004/0132780 A1 Allen et al. (43) Pub. Date: Jul. 8, 2004 (54) METHOD AND COMPOSITIONS FOR (52) U.S. Cl. .............................................................. 514/334 TREATING MIGRAINES (76) Inventors: Christopher P. Allen, Doylestown, PA (57) ABSTRACT (US); Phyllis W. Stone, Somerset, NJ (US); Sean Harper, Gwynedd Valley, The present invention relates to a method for treating or PA (US) preventing migraines in a mammalian patient in need of Such treatment or prevention comprising administering to Correspondence Address: Said patient a compound of Formula A or a pharmaceutically MERCKAND COINC Salt, hydrate or N-oxide thereof, in an amount that is PO BOX 2000 effective to treat or prevent migraines. RAHWAY, NJ 070650907 (21) Appl. No.: 10/476,753 (A) SOCH (22) PCT Filed: Apr. 30, 2002 (86) PCT No.: PCT/US02/13750 C N (30) Foreign Application Priority Data 4. N May 4, 2001 (US).......................................... 60/288623 2 Publication Classification (51) Int. Cl." ............................................ A61K 31/444 US 2004/O132780 A1 Jul. 8, 2004 METHOD AND COMPOSITIONS FOR TREATING DETAILED DESCRIPTION MIGRAINES 0007. The present invention encompasses a method for BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION treating or preventing migraines in a mammalian patient in need of Such treatment or prevention comprising adminis 0001 Migraines are recurrent, often familial, symptom tering to Said patient a compound of Formula A: complexes of periodic attacks of vascular headache. The condition is characterized by intermittent attacks of head ache, preceded by an aura in approximately 15% of patients. The headache is often accompanied by associated Symp SOCH3 toms, most commonly nausea, vomiting, photophobia and phonophobia.
    [Show full text]
  • ARCI Uniform Classification Guidelines for Foreign Substances, Or Similar State Regulatory Guidelines, Shall Be Assigned Points As Follows
    DRUG TESTING STANDARDS AND PRACTICES PROGRAM. Uniform Classification Guidelines for Foreign Substances And Recommended Penalties Model Rule. January, 2019 (V.14.0) © ASSOCIATION OF RACING COMMISSIONERS INTERNATIONAL – 2019. Association of Racing Commissioners International 2365 Harrodsburg Road- B450 Lexington, Kentucky, USA www.arci.com Page 1 of 66 Preamble to the Uniform Classification Guidelines of Foreign Substances The Preamble to the Uniform Classification Guidelines was approved by the RCI Drug Testing and Quality Assurance Program Committee (now the Drug Testing Standards and Practices Program Committee) on August 26, 1991. Minor revisions to the Preamble were made by the Drug Classification subcommittee (now the Veterinary Pharmacologists Subcommittee) on September 3, 1991. "The Uniform Classification Guidelines printed on the following pages are intended to assist stewards, hearing officers and racing commissioners in evaluating the seriousness of alleged violations of medication and prohibited substance rules in racing jurisdictions. Practicing equine veterinarians, state veterinarians, and equine pharmacologists are available and should be consulted to explain the pharmacological effects of the drugs listed in each class prior to any decisions with respect to penalities to be imposed. The ranking of drugs is based on their pharmacology, their ability to influence the outcome of a race, whether or not they have legitimate therapeutic uses in the racing horse, or other evidence that they may be used improperly. These classes of drugs are intended only as guidelines and should be employed only to assist persons adjudicating facts and opinions in understanding the seriousness of the alleged offenses. The facts of each case are always different and there may be mitigating circumstances which should always be considered.
    [Show full text]
  • Dihydroergotoxine Mesylate
    Dihydroergotoxine mesylate sc-203921 Material Safety Data Sheet Hazard Alert Code Key: EXTREME HIGH MODERATE LOW Section 1 - CHEMICAL PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION PRODUCT NAME Dihydroergotoxine mesylate STATEMENT OF HAZARDOUS NATURE CONSIDERED A HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE ACCORDING TO OSHA 29 CFR 1910.1200. NFPA FLAMMABILITY1 HEALTH2 HAZARD INSTABILITY0 SUPPLIER Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. 2145 Delaware Avenue Santa Cruz, California 95060 800.457.3801 or 831.457.3800 EMERGENCY: ChemWatch Within the US & Canada: 877-715-9305 Outside the US & Canada: +800 2436 2255 (1-800-CHEMCALL) or call +613 9573 3112 SYNONYMS "C31-H41-N5-O5.C-H4-O3-S: C35-H41-N5-O5.C-H4-O3-S: C32-H43.N5-O5.C-", H4-O3-S, "a mixture in equal proportions of", "dihydroergocornine mesylate, dihydroergocristine mesylate and", "dihydroergocryptine mesylate (alpha-and beta-forms) 1.5:2.5:1", "dihydroergotoxine mesilate", "dihydroergotoxine mesylate", "dihydroergotoxine methanesulphonate", "dihydroerotoxin mesylate", "dihydrogenated ergot alkaloids", "ergoloid mesylate", "hydrogenated ergot alkaloids", "ergotoxine, dihydro-, monomethanesulfonate", CCK-179, Circanol, "CO-Dergocrine mesylate", "Codergocrine Mesylate", Coristin, Dacoren, DCCK, Deapril-ST, DH-Ergotoxin-forte, Dulcion, Ergodilat, Ergoplus, Hydergin, Hydergina, Hydergine, Ischelium, Niloric, Optamine, Perenan, Progeril, Redergam, Segolan, Secatoxin, Redergin, "ergot alkaloid" Section 2 - HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION CHEMWATCH HAZARD RATINGS Min Max Flammability: 1 Toxicity: 2 Body Contact: 2 Min/Nil=0 Low=1 Reactivity: 1 Moderate=2 High=3 Chronic: 3 Extreme=4 CANADIAN WHMIS SYMBOLS 1 of 8 EMERGENCY OVERVIEW RISK Harmful if swallowed. May cause harm to the unborn child. Possible risk of impaired fertility. Irritating to eyes, respiratory system and skin. POTENTIAL HEALTH EFFECTS ACUTE HEALTH EFFECTS SWALLOWED ! Accidental ingestion of the material may be harmful; animal experiments indicate that ingestion of less than 150 gram may be fatal or may produce serious damage to the health of the individual.
    [Show full text]
  • Nomination Background: Hydergine (CASRN: 8067-24-1)
    SUMMARY OF DATA FOR CHEMICAL SELECTION Hydergine®1 8067-24-1 BASIS OF NOMINATION TO THE CSWG Hydergine was identified from a review of substances being promoted as nootropics or "smart drugs" for cognition enhancement in well persons of all ages. Hydergine is also a prescription drug for the treatment of senility and cerebrovascular insufficiency. Hydergine is an ergot alkaloid. Ergot alkaloids have a wide field of therapeutic application, and their biological activities are strongly dependent on their structural conformation. Despite their widespread use, little information on the carcinogenic or mutagenic potential of hydergine or closely related ergot alkaloids was found in the available literature. Information on the genotoxicity of hydergine was mixed and not completely consistent with the results reported for the closely related compound, ergotamine. SELECTION STATUS ACTION BY CSWG: 12/16/99 Studies requested: Standard battery of genotoxicity tests including Ames Salmonella and micronucleus assays Priority: The CSWG does not assign priority to genotoxicity testing Rationale/Remarks: An ergot alkaloid prescription drug recently promoted for use as a “smart drug” for healthy individuals seeking cognition enhancement Mixed results regarding genotoxicity; no information on carcinogenicity Ergot alkaloids have a wide range of effects influenced by small changes in structure which affect receptor site binding 1Hydergine® is a registered trademark of Sandoz Pharmaceuticals; the drug will be referred to as "hydergine" for the purpose of
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Study ARRAY 818 302 Array Biopharma Inc
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ncorafenib (BRAF V600-mutant inhibitor)/Binimetinib (MEK inhibitor) Array BioPharma Inc. Clinical Study ARRAY-818-302 PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR AGREEMENT I have read and understand the contents of the clinical protocol for Clinical Study ARRAY-818-302 dated 11 July 2019 and will adhere to the study requirements as presented, including all statements regarding confidentiality. In addition, I will conduct the study in accordance with the requirements of this protocol and also protect the rights, safety, privacy and well-being of study patients in accordance with the following: • International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use Harmonised Tripartite Guideline for Good Clinical Practice (GCP) E6(R1) • All applicable laws and regulations, including, without limitation, data privacy laws and
    [Show full text]