DOCSLIB.ORG

Privatization Programme for 2006 and Main Trend of the Federal Property Privatization for 2006-2008

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Privatization Programme for 2006 and Main Trend of the Federal Property Privatization for 2006-2008 Approved by the Order of the Russian Federation government as of August 25, 2005 № 1306-р Privatization programme for 2006 and main trend of the federal property privatization for 2006-2008 Part I Main trend of the federal property privatization for 2006-2008 1. Purposes and objectives of the federal property privatization programme for 2006-2008 Privatization programme for 2006 and main trend of the federal property privatization for 2006-2008 (hereafter privatization programme) was developed in accordance with Federal law “Privatization of state-owned and municipal property”. Privatization programme is aimed at implementation of the tasks which were conceived in the President's Message to Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation in 2005. Main tasks of the federal property privatization programme for 2006-2008 are the following: − privatization of the federal property which is free from the state duty support; − stage-by-stage reduction of the federal state-owned unitary enterprises; − enhancement of privatization process; − income generation of the federal budget. 2. Anticipation of the federal property privatization influence on structural changes in economy As of June 1, 2005 Russian Federation is owner of 8293 federal state-owned unitary enterprises and stockholder of 3783 joint-stock companies. According to branch of economy, total amount of federal state-owned unitary enterprises and joint-stock companies which shares are belonging to federal property is the following: 1 Amount of joint-stock companies Amount of federal state-owned Branch of economy with the participation of unitary enterprises Russian Federation Non-productive sphere 3617 685 Industry – total 1870 2078 including: Machine-building industry 734 187 Light industry 194 9 Food industry 55 54 Building materials industry 68 19 Metallurgy industry 34 28 Chemical industry 39 46 Agricultural industry 1111 229 Timber industry 67 45 Transport and communications 725 459 Building industry 903 287 Depending on federal stake percentage in authorized capital of joint-stock company blocks of shares are distributed as follows: Amount of shares belonging to federal property Amount of joint-stock (% of authorized capital) companies 100% 413 From 50 to 100% 474 From 25 to 50% 1093 25% and less 1544 Concerning participation of the Russian Federation in management of 259 joint-stock company special right (“gold share”) is used and there are no shares belonging to federal property In 2006 - 2008 blocks of shares of the joint-stock companies created by corporatisation of the federal state-owned unitary enterprises, excluding joint-stock companies included in the list of the strategic enterprises, strategic joint-stock companies (hereafter - list of strategic joint-stock companies) and companies engaging in formation of integrated institutions will be put up for sale. In 2006 the following blocks of shares will be put up for sale: − blocks of shares which percentage is no more than 50% of the authorized capital of corresponding joint-stock companies, excluding those included in the list of strategic joint-stock companies or those engaging in formation of integrated institutions, and also blocks of shares which sale will be performed on the basis of needs of the federal budget income generation in 2006 and for the period till 2008 according to the perspective financial plan; 2 − blocks of shares of joint-stock companies relating to the following branches of economy – gas industry, power building industry, building industry, cinematography and film service, civil aviation, health service industry, chemical, petrochemical and printing industry, geology, fishing industry, poultry industry, plant growing industry, cattle breeding industry, timber industry, medical industry, stakes of foreign economic organizations and machine-building industry (excluding joint-stock companies included in the list of the strategic enterprises); − federal state-owned unitary enterprises relating to civil aviation, geology, oil-and-gas industry, fuel industry, sea and river transport, printing industry, health service industry, plant growing industry, poultry industry and cattle breeding industry. During privatization of enterprises engaging in housing and municipal service which include facilities of electric network, heating network, water and gas network such facilities are planned to transfer into ownership of corresponding constituent entity of the Russian Federation or municipal formation. In 2006 within the framework of federal purpose-oriented program “Reforming and development of military-industrial complex (2002-2006)” creation of integrated institutions in military-industrial complex will be continued. In 2007-2008 all federal state-owned unitary enterprises which do not provide for the fulfillment of state duty of the Russian Federation and blocks of shares of the opened joint-stock companies created by corporatisation of such federal state-owned unitary enterprises will be offered for privatization. Here is the list of federal state-owned unitary enterprises offered for privatization (according to the branch of economy): Amount of federal state-owned Branch of economy unitary enterprises Foreign economic activity 11 Water transport 3 Air transport 8 Geology and industry of precious metals and precious stones 41 Road facilities 60 Railway transport 2 Publishing and printing industry 23 Light industry 1 Timber industry 34 Machine-building industry 11 Medical industry 3 Non-productive sphere 124 Oil-and-gas industry 2 3 Amount of federal state-owned Branch of economy unitary enterprises Military-industrial complex 140 Building materials industry 4 Fishing industry 11 Communication services 8 Building industry 58 Fuel and energy industry 26 Trade industry 6 Coal industry 3 Chemical and petrochemical industry 4 Power building industry 1 Total 885 Here is the list of opened joint-stock companies offered for privatization (according to the branch of economy): Branch of economy Amount of joint-stock companies Motor transport 30 Agricultural industry 69 Foreign economic activity 4 Water transport 11 Air transport 8 Geology and industry of precious metals and precious stones 5 Railway transport 7 Publishing and printing industry 9 Finance and credit 7 Light industry 7 Timber industry 5 Machine-building industry 18 Medical industry 8 Metallurgical industry 3 Non-productive sphere 45 Oil-and-gas industry 3 Military-industrial complex 39 Food industry 1 Building materials industry 6 Fishing industry 1 Communication services 10 Insurance industry 1 Building industry 43 Shipbuilding industry 2 Fuel and energy industry 19 Trade industry 1 Chemical and petrochemical industry 20 Power building industry 1 Total 383 4 3. Anticipation of federal budget revenue after sales of federal property According to anticipation of the Russian Federation socio-economic development for medium-term perspective estimated government revenues after sales of federal property in 2006 totals not less than 31 billion roubles. Part II Federal property offered for privatization in 2006 LIST OF OPENED JSC’S BELONGING TO FEDERAL PROPERTY WHICH SHARES ARE PLANNED TO BE PRIVATIZED IN 2006 Amount of shares Amount of shares which are planned to be privatized belonging to federal № Name of JSC property % of authorized (% of authorized capital) Total amount capital 1. Motor transport 1.1. Transport column 1263, Krasnoyarsk 0,01 1 0,01 Transport column 1745, industrial 1.2. 0,08 1 0,08 community Anna, Voronezh region 1.3. Transport column 1747, Voronezh 0,01 1 0,01 1.4. Transport column 2082, Krasnoyarsk – 1 – 1.5. Autoexpress, Krasnoyarsk 0,09 1 0,09 Balashovavtotrans, Balashov, 1.6. – 1 – Saratov region Ivanovo transport column 1163, 1.7. 100 16850 100 Ivanovo Irkutsk cargo motor transport 1.8. 0,01 1 0,01 enterprise № 2, Irkutsk Passenger motor transport enterprise, 1.9. – 1 – Ishim, Tyumen region Kalmyk operating unit of 1.10. 100 8930 100 technological communication, Elista Motor transport enterprise, 1.11. 100 65534 100 Kolchugino, Vladimir region 1.12. Transport column 1419, Krasnodar 100 178056 100 Passenger motor transport enterprise, 1.13. – 1 – Krasnoyarsk Transport column 1597, Kungur, 1.14. 0,01 1 0,01 Perm region Logistics enterprise, village 1.15. 39,18 668 39,18 Beloyarovo, Amur region Transport column 1490, Novorossisk, 1.16. 100 363971 100 Krasnodar region Transport column 2097, Cossack 1.17. 100 36764 100 village Otradnaya, Krasnodar region 1.18. The Enterprise 1564, Stavropol – 1 – 1.19. Pskovavtosnabservis, Pskov 100 3110 100 5 Amount of shares Amount of shares which are planned to be privatized belonging to federal № Name of JSC property % of authorized (% of authorized capital) Total amount capital Transport column 1316, 1.20. – 1 – Nevinnomyssk, Stavropol region Motor transport enterprise, 1.21. – 1 – Svetlograd, Stavropol region 1.22. Sigma-Transstroy, Moscow 19,97 261000 19,97 Transport column, Slavyansk-on- 1.23. 100 9390 100 Kuban, Krasnodar region 1.24. Stavropolavtotrans, Stavropol 34,2 2053 34,2 Transport column 1295, Timashevsk, 1.25. 100 42132 100 Krasnodar region Service station, Tihoretsk, Krasnodar 1.26. 100 12610 100 region 1.27. Transport agency, Ekaterinburg 49,59 44605 49,59 1.28. Transportnik, Tyumen 100 8510 100 Transport column 1314, Ust-Labinsk, 1.29. 100 23245 100 Krasnodar region 1.30. Tsentrodorstroy, Moscow 25 5811 25 2. Agricultural industry Joint-stock agriculture-industrial corporation for complex arrangement 2.1. of facilities in the Nonchernozem 38,83 254 38,83 zone of the Russian
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Social and Economic Space Compression in Border Areas: the Case of the Northwestern Federal District Romanova, E.; Vinogradova, O.; Frizina, I
    www.ssoar.info Social and economic space compression in border areas: the case of the Northwestern Federal District Romanova, E.; Vinogradova, O.; Frizina, I. Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Romanova, E., Vinogradova, O., & Frizina, I. (2015). Social and economic space compression in border areas: the case of the Northwestern Federal District. Baltic Region, 3, 28-46. https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2015-3-3 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Free Digital Peer Publishing Licence This document is made available under a Free Digital Peer zur Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den DiPP-Lizenzen Publishing Licence. For more Information see: finden Sie hier: http://www.dipp.nrw.de/lizenzen/dppl/service/dppl/ http://www.dipp.nrw.de/lizenzen/dppl/service/dppl/ Diese Version ist zitierbar unter / This version is citable under: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-51391-6 Economic and geographical development of the Russian Northwest ECONOMIC AND GEOGRAPHICAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE RUSSIAN NORTHWEST The so-called “compression” of social SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC and economic space has been the subject of SPACE COMPRESSION quite a few studies in the past decades. There are two principle types of compres- IN BORDER AREAS: sion: communicative, that is, associated THE CASE with the development of transport and in- OF THE NORTHWESTERN formation systems, and physical, mani- FEDERAL DISTRICT fested in the rapid decrease of the number of new territories to explore. While physi- cal and communicative compression are in- terrelated, they have different spatial ex- * pressions depending on geographical con- E.
    [Show full text]
  • Sebezh Has a Railroad Station on the Moscow-Riga Line, 189 Kilometers South of Pskov
    Sebezh has a railroad station on the Moscow-Riga line, 189 kilometers south of Pskov. In 1922 it was still part of Vitehsk province." Peter Kenez University of California, Santa Cruz William B. Husband. Revolution in the Factory: The Birth of the Soviet Textile Industry, 1917-1920. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990. vii, 227 pp. $45.50 Cdn. Distributed in Canada by Oxford University Press, Don Mills, Ontario. The rank and file workers in the textile industry expressed precise and immanently concrete, if not altogether unpredictable, complaints. At a Nizhnii-Novgorod provincial conference, the workers at the Reshetekhin Factory reported a shortage of fuel and of skilled workers; the Trubanov Factory needed qualified specialists; the food crisis had reduced production significantly at the Molotov Factory and forced workers to desert the Nizhegorod Wool Factory in large numbers to search for food; a typhus epidemic reduced work at the Gorbatov Factory by half; and the Gorbatov and Rastiakin Rope Factories complained about the absence of cultural- educational work. Later reports indicated shortages of cotton had not yet affecf,ed the Medvedov and Danilov Factories, but the Shlikterman had just closed down; fuel shortages severely crippled the Tritskaia and Dubovits Factories, while the Strelkov and the former Tregubov Factories were forced to close their doors. But the problem with studying the work- ing class from the local perspective, specifically the textile workers of the Central Industrial Region, is that this "agenda," with but slight variations, holds true for, say, the fall of 1915 and the spring of 1917; the fall of 1918 and mid-1919; and even for the fall of 1921! As Husband astutely points out in his conclusion, the same 'local interests continued to be identified in 1918-1920 much as they had been against the Imperial and Provisional governments in 1917" (p.
    [Show full text]
  • Entoloma Subgenus Leptonia in Boreal-Temperate Eurasia: Towards a Phylogenetic Species Concept
    Persoonia 32, 2014: 141–169 www.ingentaconnect.com/content/nhn/pimj RESEARCH ARTICLE http://dx.doi.org/10.3767/003158514X681774 Entoloma subgenus Leptonia in boreal-temperate Eurasia: towards a phylogenetic species concept O.V. Morozova1, M.E. Noordeloos2, J. Vila3 Key words Abstract This study reveals the concordance, or lack thereof, between morphological and phylogenetic species concepts within Entoloma subg. Leptonia in boreal-temperate Eurasia, combining a critical morphological examina- Entolomataceae tion with a multigene phylogeny based on nrITS, nrLSU and mtSSU sequences. A total of 16 taxa was investigated. morphology Emended concepts of subg. Leptonia and sect. Leptonia as well as the new sect. Dichroi are presented. Two species multiple gene phylogeny (Entoloma percoelestinum and E. sublaevisporum) and one variety (E. tjallingiorum var. laricinum) are described as neotypes new to science. On the basis of the morphological and phylogenetical evidence E. alnetorum is reduced to a variety new species of E. tjallingiorum, and E. venustum is considered a variety of E. callichroum. Accordingly, the new combinations E. tjallingiorum var. alnetorum and E. callichroum var. venustum are proposed. Entoloma lepidissimum var. pau- ciangulatum is now treated as a synonym of E. chytrophilum. Neotypes for E. di chroum, E. euchroum and E. lam- propus are designated. Article info Received: 22 May 2013; Accepted: 9 December 2013: Published: 1 May 2014. INTRODUCTION et al. 2013). Moreover, Baroni et al. (2011) have demonstrated the paraphyly of the Entolomataceae. Continued phylogenetic The genus Entoloma s.l. is very species-rich and morpholo- studies, based on both morphological characters and molecular gically diverse. It contains more than 1 500 species and oc- markers (He et al.
    [Show full text]
  • RCN #33 21/8/03 13:57 Page 1
    RCN #33 21/8/03 13:57 Page 1 No. 33 Summer 2003 Special issue: The Transformation of Protected Areas in Russia A Ten-Year Review PROMOTING BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION IN RUSSIA AND THROUGHOUT NORTHERN EURASIA RCN #33 21/8/03 13:57 Page 2 CONTENTS CONTENTS Voice from the Wild (Letter from the Editors)......................................1 Ten Years of Teaching and Learning in Bolshaya Kokshaga Zapovednik ...............................................................24 BY WAY OF AN INTRODUCTION The Formation of Regional Associations A Brief History of Modern Russian Nature Reserves..........................2 of Protected Areas........................................................................................................27 A Glossary of Russian Protected Areas...........................................................3 The Growth of Regional Nature Protection: A Case Study from the Orlovskaya Oblast ..............................................29 THE PAST TEN YEARS: Making Friends beyond Boundaries.............................................................30 TRENDS AND CASE STUDIES A Spotlight on Kerzhensky Zapovednik...................................................32 Geographic Development ........................................................................................5 Ecotourism in Protected Areas: Problems and Possibilities......34 Legal Developments in Nature Protection.................................................7 A LOOK TO THE FUTURE Financing Zapovedniks ...........................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • ~:, ~'., > ~, ~, H . .,,: ~ ~ ...R' '" S:' 7 " ~ Rr¸~ '' ~ :'I!7
    1985 : ~:~, ~'.~, > ~, ~, H .~ .,,~: ~ ~ ...... r'~ '~" S:~'~ 7 " ~ rr~¸¸~ ''¸¸ ~ :'~i!7 "~%" "< ....... 7¸¸ • 7"" "~ ..... '¸ ¸¸~ GUIDES TO GERMAN RECORDS MICROFILMED AT ALEXANDRIA, VA No. 85. Records of the German Armed Forces High Command, Part VIII, War Economy and Armament Office (Oberkommando der Wehrmacht, Wehrwirtschafts-~ und Ruestungsamt) (OKW/Wi Rue Amt) National Archives and Records Administration Washington, DC: 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ........................................................... i Glos~ of Selected Terms and Abbreviations ................................. iv Captured German and Related Records in ~,he National Archives .................. vii Published. Guides to German Records Microfilmed at Alexandria, V/~ ............. xxii Suggestions for Citing Microfilm .......................................... xxvi Instructions for Ordering Microfilm ........................................ x-xix Guide Entries .......................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION The Guide Proiect The Guides to German Records Microfilmed at Alexandria, Va., constitui, e a series of finding aids to the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) microfilm publications of seized records of German central, regional, and local government agencies and of military commands and units, as well as of the Nazi Party, its component formations, affiliated associations, and supervised organizations. For the most part, these records were created during the period 1920-1945. ~I~e guide series was initiated as
    [Show full text]
  • Pskov from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Coordinates: 57°49′N 28°20′E
    Create account Log in Article Talk Read Edit View history Pskov From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Coordinates: 57°49′N 28°20′E Pskov (Russian: Псков; IPA: [pskof] ( listen), ancient Russian spelling "Плѣсковъ", Pleskov) is Navigation Pskov (English) a city and the administrative center of Pskov Oblast, Russia, located about 20 kilometers Псков (Russian) Main page (12 mi) east from the Estonian border, on the Velikaya River. Population: 203,279 (2010 [1] Contents Census);[3] 202,780 (2002 Census);[5] 203,789 (1989 Census).[6] - City - Featured content Current events Contents Random article 1 History Donate to Wikipedia 1.1 Early history 1.2 Pskov Republic 1.3 Modern history Interaction 2 Administrative and municipal status Help 3 Landmarks and sights About Wikipedia 4 Climate Community portal 5 Economy Recent changes 6 Notable people Krom (or Kremlin) in Pskov Contact Wikipedia 7 International relations 7.1 Twin towns and sister cities Toolbox 8 References 8.1 Notes What links here 8.2 Sources Related changes 9 External links Upload file Special pages History [edit] Location of Pskov Oblast in Russia Permanent link Page information Data item Early history [edit] Cite this page The name of the city, originally spelled "Pleskov", may be loosely translated as "[the town] of purling waters". Its earliest mention comes in 903, which records that Igor of Kiev married a [citation needed] Print/export local lady, St. Olga. Pskovians sometimes take this year as the city's foundation date, and in 2003 a great jubilee took place to celebrate Pskov's 1,100th anniversary. Create a book Pskov The first prince of Pskov was Vladimir the Great's younger son Sudislav.
    [Show full text]
  • Zarasai, Litnuania [email protected] DATE LOCATION ACTIVITY CHAIN of COMMAND 163
    162 290. INFANTtRIE-DIVISION - UNIT HISTORY LOCATION ACTIVITY CHAIN OF COMMAND 1940/02/01 Tr.Ueb.Pl. monster, Wenrkreis X, Activation (8. Welle), Subordinate to: Stellv.Gen.Kdo. X, 1940/02/01-1940/05/16 Soltau, Fallingbostel, iibstorf, formation, training C.O.: Gen.Lt. Max uennerlein, 1940/02/06-1940/06/09 Schneveraingen, Bergen, WenrKr. XI (source: situation maps of Lage West ana general officer personnel files) 1940/05/10 Operational readiness 1940/05/14 Schnee citei Transfer Subordinate to: AK 38, 1940/05/17-1940/05/20 1940/05/19 Reuland, Weisstoampach, Saint- Movement AK 42, 1940/05/21-1940/05/23 Hubert, Libin, Gedinne, Belgium 1940/05/24 Kevin, Any, Origny-en-Thieracne, Movement, AK 38, 1940/05/24 Vervins, Sains- Ricnauinont, offensive engagements AK 42, 1940/05/25-1940/06/02 Saint-^uentin, Venaeuil, Laon, AK 18, 1940/06/03-1940/07/08 Oise-Aisne Canal, Soissons, wezy, Chateau-Tiiierry, Nangis, Montargis, CoO.: Gen.Lt. Theodor Frhr. von Wrede, 1940/06/08-1942/07/01 Bieneau, Gien, France 1940/00/21 Bieneau, Gien Offensive engagements 1940/07/01 Cnateauoriant, La Baule, Blois, Coastal defense, 1940/10/10 Neung, Vivy, floyetut, Anders, security, Saint-i>iazaire, Nantes occupation duty, training (no records for I940/0o/21-l941/01/31, source: situation maps of Lage West) 1941/02/01 La iiaule, Cnateaubriant, Nantes Coastal defense, security Subordinate to: AK 25, 1941/02/01-1941/02/28 1941/02/25 Gruuziadz, Poland Transfer, training AK 1, 1941/03/01-1941/03/15 AK 2, 1941/03/16-1941/03/31 1941/04/08 Elbing, Wormditt (Orneta), Movement, AK
    [Show full text]
  • Social and Economic Space Compression in Border Areas: the Case of the Northwestern Federal District Romanova, E.; Vinogradova, O.; Frizina, I
    www.ssoar.info Social and economic space compression in border areas: the case of the Northwestern Federal District Romanova, E.; Vinogradova, O.; Frizina, I. Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Romanova, E., Vinogradova, O., & Frizina, I. (2015). Social and economic space compression in border areas: the case of the Northwestern Federal District. Baltic Region, 3, 28-46. https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2015-3-3 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Free Digital Peer Publishing Licence This document is made available under a Free Digital Peer zur Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den DiPP-Lizenzen Publishing Licence. For more Information see: finden Sie hier: http://www.dipp.nrw.de/lizenzen/dppl/service/dppl/ http://www.dipp.nrw.de/lizenzen/dppl/service/dppl/ Diese Version ist zitierbar unter / This version is citable under: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-51391-6 Economic and geographical development of the Russian Northwest ECONOMIC AND GEOGRAPHICAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE RUSSIAN NORTHWEST The so-called “compression” of social SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC and economic space has been the subject of SPACE COMPRESSION quite a few studies in the past decades. There are two principle types of compres- IN BORDER AREAS: sion: communicative, that is, associated THE CASE with the development of transport and in- OF THE NORTHWESTERN formation systems, and physical, mani- FEDERAL DISTRICT fested in the rapid decrease of the number of new territories to explore. While physi- cal and communicative compression are in- terrelated, they have different spatial ex- * pressions depending on geographical con- E.
    [Show full text]
  • Gazprom EE 2014 11.Indd
    OAO Gazprom Environmental Report 2014 The Power of Growth OAO Gazprom Environmental Report 2014 Table of contents 5 Letter of Deputy Chairman of OAO Gazprom Management Committee 6 Introduction 8 Environmental protection management 8 Environmental Management System 11 Environmental targets and programs 13 Financing of environmental protection 16 Adverse environmental impact fee 20 Environmental performance and energy saving 20 Air protection 24 Greenhouse gas emissions 25 Utilization of associated petroleum gas 27 Reduction of vehicle fl eet impact on air 29 Water use and protection of water resources 31 Production and consumption waste management 36 Protection of land and soil 40 Protection of biodiversity 43 Energy saving 46 Parameters of environmental activity and environmental impact of OAO Gazprom abroad 48 Preventing negative impact on the environment 48 Environmental assessment of projects 50 Production environmental monitoring and control 56 Accidents and incidents 57 Environmental risks insurance 58 State environmental control 59 Environment protection scientifi c and technical support 59 Scientifi c research and development 64 Implementation of the best available technologies for environmental protection 65 Gazprom Prize in science and technical engineering 67 International cooperation 69 Information disclosure 71 Major results of Year of Environmental Awareness in OAO Gazprom 74 Offi cial events of OAO Gazprom 77 Events of subsidiary companies 84 Conclusion 85 Glossary of main terms and abbreviations 87 Addresses and contacts OAO Gazprom Environmental Report 2014 Letter of Deputy Chairman of 5 OAO Gazprom Management Committee Dear readers! On behalf of the OAO Gazprom Management Committee I present you our Environmental Report 2014. In the Gazprom strategy as both socially responsible and power industry company, we pay special attention to the issues of preservation of nature, environmental protection and energy saving.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport and Infrastructural Basis of the Tourism Development Strategy in the Arkhangelsk Oblast © Aleksandr Yu
    Aleksandr Yu. TSVETKOV. Transport and infrastructural basis … 35 UDC [338.48+332.14](470.11)(045) DOI: 10.37482/issn2221-2698.2020.38.44 Transport and infrastructural basis of the tourism development strategy in the Arkhangelsk Oblast © Aleksandr Yu. TSVETKOV, Cand. Sci. (Econ.), associate professor E-mail: [email protected] Department of Management, Higher School of Economics, Management and Law, Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov, Arkhangelsk, Russia Abstract. The article, devoted to the analysis of transport and geographical locations, describes possible strategies for the development of tourism in the Arkhangelsk Oblast. The main goal of the research was the development of logistic schemes of the transportation of tourists from the places of formation of tourist flows to the Arkhangelsk Oblast. The methodological basis of the article is to determine the economic dis- tances between potential tourist distribution centers and their places of interest in the area. Moscow, St. Petersburg, and Arkhangelsk were considered as the main towns of departure. Kargopol, Solvychegodsk, Kholmogory and Lomonosovo, Solovki, Kenozersky National Park, and Pinega caves are regarded as the main sites of tourist interest in the Arkhangelsk Oblast. It was determined that Kargopol is the most acces- sible for tourists, and Kenozersky National Park is the most recognizable by tourists but the least accessible. The object of world cultural heritage, the Monastery of the Transfiguration of the Saviour on Solovki is the most accessible for tourists from the territory of Karelia. It is recommended to optimize the schedule and to synchronize the work of transport for tourists to improve the transport accessibility of recreational facili- ties in the area.
    [Show full text]
  • State Support of Investment, Innovation and Production Activities 3
    The investment policy of the Kemerovo Region has the following priorities: creating a favourable investment climate; improving regional legislation on investment and innovation; creating an investment infrastructure and new investment sites; developing a transport infrastructure; establishing intersectoral and territorial clusters; making a better use of state support to investment activity; strengthening measures to attract investment in high tech projects; using pension, insurance and mutual funds to imple- ment major infrastructural projects; developing public-private partnerships; providing information and staff support to investment projects; and eliminating administrative barriers and minimising corruption risks. An excerpt from the Investment Memorandum of the Kemerovo Region (adopted by the Kemerovo Region Administration Board, Regulation No. 1187-r of 30 December 2011) 1 Kemerovo Region Investment Profile Contents Foreword by Aman Tuleyev, Governor of the Kemerovo Region ..................................................................................... 4 Section 1. Introduction ......................................................................... 6 1.1. Geography ..................................................................... 6 1.2. Administrative and territorial divisions ................. 6 Section 2. Investment Policy and Investment Potential ......... 8 2.1. Investment strategy .................................................... 8 2.2. Investment priorities ............................................... 8 2.3.
    [Show full text]
  • 75E6231a30789a77100300d26
    ИНВЕСТИЦИОННЫЙ МЕМОРАНДУМ ПСКОВСКОЙ ОБЛАСТИ INVESTMENT MEMORANDUM PSKOV REGION 3 СОДЕРЖАНИЕ CONTENT 1. КРАТКАЯ ИНФОРМАЦИЯ О ПСКОВСКОЙ ОБЛАСТИ .........4 1. SHORT DESCRIPTION OF PSKOV REGION ........................ 5 2. КОНКУРЕНТНЫЕ ПРЕИМУЩЕСТВА 2. COMPITITIVE PREFERENCES ПСКОВСКОЙ ОБЛАСТИ ......................................................8 OF PSKOV REGION ............................................................. 9 2.1. Выгодное экономико-географическое положение, 2.1. Advantage economic geographical location, высокий уровень транспортной доступности ..................... 8 Effi ciency transport accessibility .......................................... 9 2.2. Высококвалифицированные трудовые ресурсы ........ 12 2.2. Highly-skilled labor resources. .....................................13 2.3 Наличие площадок для размещения промышленных 2.3 Existence of sites for industrial production производств и логистических центров ........................... 14 and logistics centers .........................................................15 2.4. Потенциал использования природных 2.4. Potential of nature resources ресурсов и полезных ископаемых ................................... 16 and minerals use ...............................................................17 2.4.1. Лесные ресурсы .................................................... 16 2.4.1. Forest resources ......................................................17 2.4.2. Водные ресурсы ................................................... 18 2.4.2. Water resources ......................................................19
    [Show full text]