DOCSLIB.ORG

153 EDWARD GRASMAN the Rembrandt Research Project: Reculer Pour Mieux Sauter* Only an Art Historian Who Had Languished for Years

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
153 EDWARD GRASMAN the Rembrandt Research Project: Reculer Pour Mieux Sauter* Only an Art Historian Who Had Languished for Years EDWARD GRASMAN The Rembrandt Research Project: reculer pour mieux sauter* Only an art historian who had languished for years in solitary confinement could have remained unaware of the controversy excited by the first three volumes of A Corpus of Kemhr??zclt ]-Ial*nti?zg?vpublished by the Rembrandt Research Project (RRP). Nor can anyone have failed to notice the hubbub caused by the big Rembrandt exhibition of in which the RRP's hand was evident.' Although the tem- pest has subsided appreciably since then, the appearance of the remaining volumes of the Corpus will undoubtedly fluttcr the dovecotes again. This calm after and be- fore the storm sccms a good moment to examine the intentions of the Rembrandt team, to establish what came of them, what prompted criticism and what we may expect of the ncxt volumes of the The present writer is not a specialist in this particular field, a circumstance which, for all its obvious drawbacks, has one advantage: hc has no earlier stance to dcfcnd.2 It is of course up to the reader to judge whether this position has led to the balanced evaluation of the RRP that I have in mind. Before embarking on a detailed consideration of the RRP, though, I should like to point out that none of those involved in the Project could possiblv have foreseen the tremendous impact their work would have. And there is no apter demonstration of the upset caused bv their findings than the reactions elicited by a single phrase in a review by Joos Bruyn, a member of the team, of Sumowski's book on Rembrandt's pupils. Bruyn suggested that further research pertaining to ?Uillem Drost, one of Rembrandt's pupils, should takc into consideration the Polish Rider in the Frick Collection, New York (Br.z79) which, according to Bruyn, has much in common with Drost's early, Rembrandtesque work .3 A circumspect re- mark, really, but it did seem to voice the opinion of the Rembrandt team and cer- tainly sparked off a major commotion. The GuardÙm and The NeJ1/ ?or,?er spoke of 'blood on the canvas' and dubbed thc Rembrandt team 'the Amsterdam 4 And Anthony Bailey used the phrase as a launching-pad for an attack on the Rcm- brandt tcam's work, quoting at one point the eminent Rembrandt scholar Julius 5 Held, who wondered: those people blind?'s The motor behind the RRP was Bob Haak, the only member of the team without a university degree in art history. The great expertise Haak brought with him when he joined the staff off the Rijksmuscum had been acquired on the art market. In 1956 Haak, bv then an assistant in the Department of Paintings in the Rijksmuseum, was involved in the major Rembrandt exhibition staged in that institution and in the Boymans Museum. Rembrandts arrived from all over the world, and Haak wars struck by the number of dubious works among them. The time had come to purge Rembrandt's oeuvre of what he never painted. It actually took more than ten years for IIaak's plans to assume concrete form. In 1968, disappointed at Kurt Bauch's book of 1966, which lacked the well-founded sifting of Rembrandt's oeuvre that 153 had been hoped for, Haak, together with Jan van Gelder, Jan Emmens, Joos Bruyn, Simon Levie and Pieter van Thiel, all of whom held important posts in museums or universities, launched the RRP. Another participant in the project since the RRP's first trips abroad was Ernst van die Wetering, a heaven-sent rein- forcement when Van Gelder fell ill. Emmens and Van Gelder were not replaced after their respective deaths in 1971 and 1980, the only change being Van de Wete- ring's gradual advancement from a student assistant to a (more than) full member of the team. It seems to me that Emmens' untimely death had a crucial effect on the project. With Emmens gone, so was the ambition to make a systematic study of the icono- graphy of Rembrandt's oeuvrc.7 Since then the project has addressed itself exclu- sively to the question of authenticity. But my bet is that Emmens' contribution would have made a difference to the answers to that question. In his dissertation of 1964, entitled Rembrandt en de regels van de kunst, Emmens paid ample attention to seventeenth-century authors such as Van Hoogstratcn and De Lairesse and their opinions about painting in general and about Rembrandt in particular. I presume that Emmens would have wanted to voice those opinions in the proposed Corpus of Rembrandt's paintings with a view to shedding a light on the context in which Rembrandt worked. However, in the volumes of the Corpus published hitherto, one searches vainly for such references to the more or less contemporaneous litera- ture on art. By and large, the entries are dominated by the question: is this an authentic Rembrandt or not? The RRP was launched more or less concurrently with the Groningen professor Horst Gerson's revision of the cataloguc of Rembrandt's paintings in 1968 - 69's Gerson had made formidable cuts in Rcmbrandt's oeuvre as presented by Bredius and was duly dubbed an iconoclast. One of the many works he repudiated was a painting purchased by the Rijksmuseum not long before, in T965, as an original Rembrandt, a lloly Fumily at X'iy/Jt (Br, j 568). From an undated newspaper cutting I have learned that Van Thiel, head of the Department of Paintings at the Rijksmu- seum, reacted at the time to Gerson's restriction by letting it be known that a con- siderable number of professors would refute it. And indeed, those are exactly the kind of reactions that the RRP, and hence Van Thiel, were subsequently to encoun- ter, time and time again. The Rembrandt team acquired - correctly - a reputation for being far more restrictive than all its predecessors. There is no denying the RRP's stringent sifting, but is it not also true that most of the paintings rejected in the Corpus are unfamiliar to the general public (certainly in this country)? After all, not even the RRP doubts the authcnticity of works such as the Syndic.s Dra- pers' Guild (Br. or the.1euJish Bride (Br. 416). The most famous work to have been disowned since the RRP embarked on its activities was the Man With the Golden He/wet in Berlin (Br.I28). Although its de-attribution has been credited to the RRP's account, nowhere is the work to be found in the al rcady published volumes of the Corpus. This is because the Corpus treats Rembrandt's works in chronological order and the team had simply not yet reached the Man With the Golden Helmet. What it boils down to is that the RRP was given the opportunity to express the already existing doubts about this work, and thus the responsibility for its de-attribution was shifted to the team. 9 Many of the works absent from the Corpzis are nonetheless to be found in Gerson. In my opinion, however, it is surely not beyond the bounds of possibility that Gcr- son would have gone at least as far, had he studied all the paintings in situ and had he had the same technical facilities at his disposal." For it must be said that the RRP was occasionally more generous than Gerson. The .S'elf=l'ortrait mith a Poodle in Paris (Br. IG), rejected by Gerson, as were the Cupid in Vaduz and the Bellona in New York (Br. 467), made a conspicuous reappearance in Rembrandt's 154 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gary Schwartz
    Gary Schwartz A Corpus of Rembrandt Paintings as a Test Case for Connoisseurship Seldom has an exercise in connoisseurship had more going for it than the world-famous Rembrandt Research Project, the RRP. This group of connoisseurs set out in 1968 to establish a corpus of Rembrandt paintings in which doubt concer- ning attributions to the master was to be reduced to a minimum. In the present enquiry, I examine the main lessons that can be learned about connoisseurship in general from the first three volumes of the project. My remarks are limited to two central issues: the methodology of the RRP and its concept of authorship. Concerning methodology,I arrive at the conclusion that the persistent appli- cation of classical connoisseurship by the RRP, attended by a look at scientific examination techniques, shows that connoisseurship, while opening our eyes to some features of a work of art, closes them to others, at the risk of generating false impressions and incorrect judgments.As for the concept of authorship, I will show that the early RRP entertained an anachronistic and fatally puristic notion of what constitutes authorship in a Dutch painting of the seventeenth century,which skewed nearly all of its attributions. These negative judgments could lead one to blame the RRP for doing an inferior job. But they can also be read in another way. If the members of the RRP were no worse than other connoisseurs, then the failure of their enterprise shows that connoisseurship was unable to deliver the advertised goods. I subscribe to the latter conviction. This paper therefore ends with a proposal for the enrichment of Rembrandt studies after the age of connoisseurship.
    [Show full text]
  • Openeclanewfieldinthehis- Work,Ret
    -t horizonte Beitràge zu Kunst und Kunstwissenschaft horizons Essais sur I'art et sur son histoire orizzonti Saggi sull'arte e sulla storia dell'arte horizons Essays on Art and Art Research Hatje Cantz 50 Jahre Schweizerisches lnstitut flir Kunstwissenschaft 50 ans lnstitut suisse pour l'étude de I'art 50 anni lstituto svizzero di studi d'arte 50 Years Swiss lnstitute for Art Research Gary Schwartz The Clones Make the Master: Rembrandt in 1ó50 A high point brought low The year r65o was long considerecl a high point ot w-atershed fcrr Rem- a painr- orandt ls a painter. a date of qrear significance in his carecr' Of ng dated ,65o, n French auction catalogue of 18o6 writes: 'sa date prouve qu'il était dans sa plus grande force'" For John Smith, the com- pl.. of ih. firr, catalogue of the artistt paintings in r836, 165o was the golden age.' This convictíon surl ived well into zenith of Rembranclt's (It :]re tnentieth centufy. Ifl 1942, Tancred Borenius wfote: was about r65o one me-v sa)i that the characteristics of Rembrandt's final manner Rosenberg in r.rr e become cleady pronounced.'l 'This date,'wroteJakob cat. Paris, ro-rr r8o6 (l'ugt 'Rembrandt: life and wotk' (r9+8/ ry64),the standard texl on the master 1 Sale June t)).n\t.1o. Fr,,m thq sxns'6rjp1 rrl years, 'can be called the end of his middle period, or equallv Jt :,r many the entrv on thc painting i n the Corpns of this ''e11, the beginning of his late one.'a Bob Haak, in 1984, enriched Renbrandt paintings, r'ith thanks to the that of Rcmbrandt Research Project for show-ing ,r.rqe b1, contrasting Rembrandt's work aftet mid-centurl' with to me this and other sections of the draft 'Rembrandt not only kept his distance from the new -.
    [Show full text]
  • The Leiden Collection Catalogue, 2Nd Ed
    Rembrandt van Rijn (Leiden 1606 – 1669 Amsterdam) How to cite Bakker, Piet. “Rembrandt van Rijn” (2017). In The Leiden Collection Catalogue, 2nd ed. Edited by Arthur K. Wheelock Jr. New York, 2017–20. https://theleidencollection.com/artists/rembrandt-van-rijn/ (archived June 2020). A PDF of every version of this biography is available in this Online Catalogue's Archive, and the Archive is managed by a permanent URL. New versions are added only when a substantive change to the narrative occurs. According to Rembrandt’s first biographer, Jan Jansz. Orlers (1570–1646), the most famous Dutch painter of the seventeenth century was born in Leiden on 15 July 1606, the ninth child of the miller Harmen Gerritsz van Rijn (1568–1630) and the baker’s daughter Neeltje Willemsdr van Suydtbrouck (ca. 1568–1640).[1] The painter grew up in the Weddesteeg, across from his father’s mill. He attended the Latin school in Leiden, and his parents enrolled him in the University of Leiden when he was fourteen, “so that upon reaching adulthood he could use his knowledge for the service of his city and the benefit of the community at large.”[2] This, however, did not come to pass, for Rembrandt’s ambitions lay elsewhere, “his natural inclination being for painting and drawing only.”[3] His parents took him out of school in 1621, allowing him to follow his passion. They apprenticed him to Jacob Isaacsz van Swanenburgh (1571–1638), who had just returned from Italy, “with whom he stayed for about three years.”[4] It is during this time that Rembrandt probably painted his earliest known works: Stone Operation (Allegory of Touch), Three Musicians (Allegory of Hearing), and Unconscious Patient (Allegory of Smell).[5] Rembrandt moved to Amsterdam in 1625 to complete his training with the leading painter of his day, Pieter Lastman (1583–1633), with whom, according to Arnold Houbraken, he stayed for six months.”[6] When Rembrandt returned to Leiden, he set up his own workshop in his parents’ house.
    [Show full text]
  • Rembrandt in Southern California Exhibition Guide
    An online exhibition exploring paintings by Rembrandt in Southern California. A collaboration between The Exhibition Rembrandt in Southern California is a virtual exhibition of paintings by Rembrandt Harmensz. van Rijn (Dutch, 1606–1669) on view in Southern California museums. This collaborative presentation offers a unique guide to exploring these significant holdings and provides information, suggested connections, and points of comparison for each work. Southern California is home to the third-largest assemblage of Rembrandt paintings in the United States, with notable strength in works from the artist’s dynamic early career in Leiden and Amsterdam. Beginning with J. Paul Getty’s enthusiastic 1938 purchase of Portrait of Marten Looten (given to LACMA in 1953; no. 9 in the Virtual Exhibition), the paintings have been collected over 80 years and are today housed in five museums, four of which were forged from private collections: the Hammer Museum, the J. Paul Getty Museum, and the Los Angeles County Museum of Art (LACMA) in Los Angeles; the Norton Simon Museum in Pasadena; and the Timken Museum of Art in San Diego. In addition, Rembrandt in Southern California provides insight into the rich holdings of etchings and drawings on paper by the master in museums throughout the region. Together, Southern California’s drawn, etched and painted works attest to the remarkable range of Rembrandt’s achievement across his long career. Self-Portrait (detail), about 1636–38. Oil on panel, 24 7/8 x 19 7/8 in. (63.2 x 50.5 cm). The Norton Simon Foundation, Pasadena, F.1969.18.P 1 NO.
    [Show full text]
  • Rembrandt Self Portraits
    Rembrandt Self Portraits Born to a family of millers in Leiden, Rembrandt left university at 14 to pursue a career as an artist. The decision turned out to be a good one since after serving his apprenticeship in Amsterdam he was singled out by Constantijn Huygens, the most influential patron in Holland. In 1634 he married Saskia van Uylenburgh. In 1649, following Saskia's death from tuberculosis, Hendrickje Stoffels entered Rembrandt's household and six years later they had a son. Rembrandt's success in his early years was as a portrait painter to the rich denizens of Amsterdam at a time when the city was being transformed from a small nondescript port into the The Night Watch 1642 economic capital of the world. His Rembrandt painted the large painting The Militia Company of Captain Frans Banning Cocq historical and religious paintings also between 1640 and 1642. This picture was called De Nachtwacht by the Dutch and The gave him wide acclaim. Night Watch by Sir Joshua Reynolds because by the 18th century the picture was so dimmed and defaced that it was almost indistinguishable, and it looked quite like a night scene. After it Despite being known as a portrait painter was cleaned, it was discovered to represent broad day—a party of musketeers stepping from a Rembrandt used his talent to push the gloomy courtyard into the blinding sunlight. boundaries of painting. This direction made him unpopular in the later years of The piece was commissioned for the new hall of the Kloveniersdoelen, the musketeer branch of his career as he shifted from being the the civic militia.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution and Ambition in the Career of Jan Lievens (1607-1674)
    ABSTRACT Title: EVOLUTION AND AMBITION IN THE CAREER OF JAN LIEVENS (1607-1674) Lloyd DeWitt, Ph.D., 2006 Directed By: Prof. Arthur K. Wheelock, Jr. Department of Art History and Archaeology The Dutch artist Jan Lievens (1607-1674) was viewed by his contemporaries as one of the most important artists of his age. Ambitious and self-confident, Lievens assimilated leading trends from Haarlem, Utrecht and Antwerp into a bold and monumental style that he refined during the late 1620s through close artistic interaction with Rembrandt van Rijn in Leiden, climaxing in a competition for a court commission. Lievens’s early Job on the Dung Heap and Raising of Lazarus demonstrate his careful adaptation of style and iconography to both theological and political conditions of his time. This much-discussed phase of Lievens’s life came to an end in 1631when Rembrandt left Leiden. Around 1631-1632 Lievens was transformed by his encounter with Anthony van Dyck, and his ambition to be a court artist led him to follow Van Dyck to London in the spring of 1632. His output of independent works in London was modest and entirely connected to Van Dyck and the English court, thus Lievens almost certainly worked in Van Dyck’s studio. In 1635, Lievens moved to Antwerp and returned to history painting, executing commissions for the Jesuits, and he also broadened his artistic vocabulary by mastering woodcut prints and landscape paintings. After a short and successful stay in Leiden in 1639, Lievens moved to Amsterdam permanently in 1644, and from 1648 until the end of his career was engaged in a string of important and prestigious civic and princely commissions in which he continued to demonstrate his aptitude for adapting to and assimilating the most current style of his day to his own somber monumentality.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Rembrandt Portrait Painting on Loan to the Wadsworth from the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Media Contact: Kim Hugo, (860) 838-4082 [email protected] Image file to accompany publicity of this announcement will be available for download at http://press.thewadsworth.org. Email to request login credentials. Major Rembrandt Portrait Painting on Loan to the Wadsworth from the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam Hartford, Conn. (January 21, 2020)—Rembrandt’s Titus in a Monk’s Habit (1660) is coming to Hartford, Connecticut. On loan from the Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam, the painting will be on view at the Wadsworth Atheneum Museum of Art from February 1 through April 30, 2020. Rembrandt van Rijn (1606–1669), recognized as one of the most important artists of his time and considered by many to be one of the greatest painters in European history, painted his teenage son in the guise of a monk at a crucial moment in his late career when he was revamping his business as a painter and recovering from bankruptcy. It has been fifty-three years since this painting has been on view in the United States making this a rare opportunity for visitors to experience a late portrait by the Dutch master among the collection of Baroque art at the Wadsworth renowned for its standout paintings by Rembrandt’s southern European contemporaries, Zurbarán, Oratio Gentileschi, and Caravaggio. While this painting has been infrequently seen in America, it exemplifies the dramatic use of light and dark to express human emotion for which Rembrandt’s late works are especially prized. “Titus in a Monk’s Habit is an important painting. It opens questions about the artist’s career, his use of traditional subjects, and the bold technique that has won him enduring fame,” says Oliver Tostmann, Susan Morse Hilles Curator of European Art at the Wadsworth.
    [Show full text]
  • Jan Lievens (Leiden 1607 – 1674 Amsterdam)
    Jan Lievens (Leiden 1607 – 1674 Amsterdam) © 2017 The Leiden Collection Jan Lievens Page 2 of 11 How To Cite Bakker, Piet. "Jan Lievens." In The Leiden Collection Catalogue. Edited by Arthur K. Wheelock Jr. New York, 2017. https://www.theleidencollection.com/archive/. This page is available on the site's Archive. PDF of every version of this page is available on the Archive, and the Archive is managed by a permanent URL. Archival copies will never be deleted. New versions are added only when a substantive change to the narrative occurs. Jan Lievens was born in Leiden on 24 October 1607. His parents were Lieven Hendricxsz, “a skillful embroiderer,” and Machtelt Jansdr van Noortsant. 1 The couple would have eight children, of whom Jan and Dirck (1612–50/51) would become painters, and Joost (Justus), the eldest son, a bookseller. 2 In 1632 Joost married an aunt of the painter Jan Steen (1625/26–79). 3 At the age of eight, Lievens was apprenticed to Joris van Schooten (ca. 1587–ca. 1653), “who painted well [and] from whom he learned the rudiments of both drawing and painting.” 4 According to Orlers, Lievens left for Amsterdam two years later in 1617 to further his education with the celebrated history painter Pieter Lastman (1583–1633), “with whom he stayed for about two years making great progress in art.” 5 What impelled his parents to send him to Amsterdam at such a young age is not known. When he returned to Leiden in 1619, barely twelve years old, “he established himself thereafter, without any other master, in his father’s house.” 6 In the years that followed, Lievens painted large, mostly religious and allegorical scenes.
    [Show full text]
  • News from the Getty
    NEWS FROM THE GETTY news.getty.edu | [email protected] DATE: October 29, 2013 MEDIA CONTACT FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Amy Hood Getty Communications (310) 440-6427 [email protected] GETTY MUSEUM’S NEWLY ACQUIRED REMBRANDT LAUGHING IS NOW ON VIEW Rembrandt Laughing, about 1628, by Rembrandt Harmensz. van Rijn At the J. Paul Getty Museum, Getty Center LOS ANGELES—The J. Paul Getty Museum’s new acquisition Rembrandt Laughing, about 1628, a recently rediscovered self-portrait by one of the most celebrated painters in history, Rembrandt, will be on view at the Museum beginning Tuesday, October 29, 2013. “The Getty Museum possesses the most significant collection of early Rembrandts in the United States, and if you had asked what addition would best cap it off, the answer would have been a self-portrait, which many regard as his greatest and most sustained achievement. But the chances of finding such a work seemed negligible—until the rediscovery of this painting in 2007. It is unquestionably one of the most Rembrandt Laughing, about 1628. Rembrandt Harmensz. remarkable works of art to become available in van Rijn (Dutch, 1606–1669). Oil on copper. 8 3/4 x 6 5/8 in. J. Paul Getty Museum, Los Angeles. recent memory,” said Timothy Potts, director of the J. Paul Getty Museum. Rembrandt Laughing, about 1628, by Rembrandt Harmensz. van Rijn (Dutch, 1606– 1669) is an early self-portrait, depicting the artist—who would have been about 22—dressed as a soldier, in deep violet and brown clothes and sporting a gleaming steel gorget. The young man leans back, smiles broadly and catches the viewer’s eye.
    [Show full text]
  • Rembrandt's Bankruptcy Today, 18 J
    DATE DOWNLOADED: Fri Feb 21 14:11:16 2020 SOURCE: Content Downloaded from HeinOnline Citations: Bluebook 20th ed. Brian Logan Beirne, Painted into a Corner: Rembrandt's Bankruptcy Today, 18 J. Transnat'l L. & Pol'y 89 (2008). ALWD 6th ed. Brian Logan Beirne, Painted into a Corner: Rembrandt's Bankruptcy Today, 18 J. Transnat'l L. & Pol'y 89 (2008). APA 6th ed. Logan Beirne, B. (2008). Painted into corner: Rembrandt's bankruptcy today. Journal of Transnational Law & Policy, 18(1), 89-108. Chicago 7th ed. Brian Logan Beirne, "Painted into a Corner: Rembrandt's Bankruptcy Today," Journal of Transnational Law & Policy 18, no. 1 (Fall 2008): 89-108 McGill Guide 9th ed. Brian Logan Beirne, "Painted into a Corner: Rembrandt's Bankruptcy Today" (2008) 18:1 J of Transnational L & Policy 89. MLA 8th ed. Logan Beirne, Brian. "Painted into a Corner: Rembrandt's Bankruptcy Today." Journal of Transnational Law & Policy, vol. 18, no. 1, Fall 2008, p. 89-108. HeinOnline. OSCOLA 4th ed. Brian Logan Beirne, 'Painted into a Corner: Rembrandt's Bankruptcy Today' (2008) 18 J Transnat'l L & Pol'y 89 -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at https://heinonline.org/HOL/License -- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text. -- To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope of your license, please use: Copyright Information PAINTED INTO A CORNER: REMBRANDT'S BANKRUPTCY TODAY BRIAN LOGAN BEIRNE* This Article analyzes the development of the concept of bank- ruptcy by examining Rembrandt's insolvency through the lens of modern law.
    [Show full text]
  • Portraits As Objects Within Seventeenth-Century Dutch Vanitas Still Life
    University of Amsterdam Graduate school of Humanities – Faculty of Humanities Arts and Culture – Dutch Art (Masters) Author: Rukshana Edwards Supervisor: Dr. E.E. P. Kolfin Second reader: Dr. A.A. Witte Language: English Date: December 1, 2015 Portraits as Objects within Seventeenth-Century Dutch Vanitas Still Life Abstract This paper is mainly concerned with the seventeenth-century Dutch vanitas still life with special attention given to its later years in 1650 – 1700. In the early period, there was significant innovation: It shaped the characteristic Dutch art of the Golden Age. The research focuses on the sub-genre of the vanitas still life, particularly the type which includes as part of its composition a human face, a physiognomic likeness by way of a print, painted portrait, painted tronie, or a sculpture. This thesis attempts to utilize this artistic tradition as a vehicle to delve into the aspects of realism and iconography in Dutch seventeenth-century art. To provide context the introduction deals with the Dutch Republic and the conditions that made this art feasible. A brief historiography of still life and vanitas still life follows. The research then delves into the still life paintings with a portrait, print or sculpture, with examples from twelve artists, and attempts to understand the relationships that exist between the objects rendered. The trends within this subject matter revolve around a master artist, other times around a city such as Haarlem, Leiden or country, England. The research looks closely at specific paintings of different artists, with a thematic focus of artist portraits, historical figures, painted tronies, and sculpture within the vanitas still life sub-genre.
    [Show full text]
  • AND the JEWISH EXPERIENCE the Berger Print Collection GALLERY GUIDE
    AND THE JEWISH EXPERIENCE The Berger Print Collection GALLERY GUIDE This exhibition is organized by Westmont Ridley-Tree Museum of Art, Santa Barbara, California. The presentation of this exhibition at Telfair Museums is curated by Courtney McNeil, Chief Curator & Deputy Director for Curatorial Affairs. The works in this binder are organized alphabetically by the title of the print. An image of the work precedes the label text. All works are by Rembrandt van Rijn (Dutch, 1606–1669) unless otherwise noted. All works courtesy of the Collection of Howard and Fran Berger, Gift to the Westmont-Ridley Tree Museum of Art. Abraham and Isaac, 1645 Etching and drypoint on laid paper B.34, I/II (White & Boon only state); H. 214 Rembrandt represents the patriarch and his son just prior to Abraham’s attempt to sacrifice Isaac. Abraham is portrayed as obedient to God’s command, yet in anguish, in contrast to the young Isaac, who accepts his fate. For Christians, this scene is often interpreted as a precursor to the crucifixion of Christ in the New Testament. Within the context of Judaism, this narrative serves as a reminder of the importance of obedience to God’s will and his divine plan. This etching captures the diverse breadth of style of Rembrandt’s etched line work. His use of drypoint enhances the sense of weighty volume and velvety texture of Abraham’s and Isaac’s garments. Abraham Casting Out Hagar and Ishmael, 1637 Etching and drypoint on laid paper B.30, I/I (White & Boon only state); H. 149 Here, the beloved Jewish-Christian patriarch Abraham reluctantly exiles his first-born son, Ishmael, and the boy’s mother, Hagar.
    [Show full text]