DOCSLIB.ORG

Identification and Screening of Infectious Carcass Pretreatment Alternatives

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Identification and Screening of Infectious Carcass Pretreatment Alternatives EPA/600/R-15/053 | March 2016 www.epa.gov/homeland-security-research Identification and Screening of Infectious Carcass Pretreatment Alternatives Office of Research and Develpment National Homeland Security Research Center Identification and Screening of Infectious Carcass Pretreatment Alternatives Identification and Screening of Infectious Carcass Pretreatment Alternatives U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development National Homeland Security Research Center 26 W. Martin Luther King Drive Cincinnati, OH 45268 Disclaimer The United States Environmental Protection Agency through its Office of Research and Development managed the research described here under Interagency Agreement No. RW-70-95849301 with the Department of Homeland Security. It has been subjected to the Agency’s review and has been approved for publication. Note that approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views of the Agency. Mention of trade names, products, or services does not convey official EPA approval, endorsement, or recommendation. Questions concerning this document or its application should be addressed to: Sandip Chattopadhyay, Ph.D. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency National Homeland Security Research Center 26 West Martin Luther King Drive, Mail Code NG16 Cincinnati, Ohio 45268 513-569-7549 [email protected] Paul Lemieux, Ph.D. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency National Homeland Security Research Center 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Mail Code E343-06 Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 919-541-0962 [email protected] Identification and Screening of Infectious Carcass Pretreatment Alternatives Acknowledgements This technical report has been prepared for the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) Office of Research and Development (ORD), National Homeland Security Research Center (NHSRC), and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS)/ Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Science and Technology Directorate. Dr. Paul Lemieux of NHSRC, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, served as task order contracting officer representative. APHIS guidance, reviews, and comments were provided by Lori Miller. Dr. Sandip Chattopadhyay (NHSRC) served as the lead author of this document. Dr. Sarah Taft, Paul Kudarauskas, Dr. Joan Bursey from U.S. EPA and Dr. Craig Ramsey from USDA/APHIS provided insight and review comments that greatly improved the document. i Identification and Screening of Infectious Carcass Pretreatment Alternatives Table of Contents Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................................... ii Acronyms and Abbreviations ...................................................................................................................... vi Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................... vii 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose and Scope ........................................................................................................................ 6 1.3 Analysis of Existing Data ............................................................................................................. 7 1.4 Overview of Animal and Carcass Handling Biosecurity Factors ................................................. 8 1.5 Infrastructural Requirements......................................................................................................... 9 2 Infectious Carcass Pretreatment Options ............................................................................................ 12 2.1 On-site Size Reduction................................................................................................................ 12 2.1.1 Definition ............................................................................................................................ 12 2.1.2 Application .......................................................................................................................... 12 2.1.3 Operational Capacity ........................................................................................................... 17 2.1.4 Environmental Issues Associated with On-site Size Reduction .......................................... 18 2.1.5 How On-site Size Reduction Tracks to Each of the Six Disposal Options ......................... 19 2.1.6 Vendors and Cost for On-site Size Reduction .................................................................... 21 2.2 Digestion ..................................................................................................................................... 22 2.2.1 Definition ............................................................................................................................ 22 2.2.2 Application .......................................................................................................................... 22 2.2.3 Operational Capacity ........................................................................................................... 24 2.2.4 Environmental Issues Associated with Digestion ............................................................... 24 2.2.5 How Digestion Tracks to Each of the Six Disposal Options .............................................. 25 2.2.6 Vendors and Cost for Digestion .......................................................................................... 26 2.3 Bioreduction ................................................................................................................................ 27 2.3.1 Definition ............................................................................................................................ 27 2.3.2 Application .......................................................................................................................... 28 2.3.3 Operational Capacity ........................................................................................................... 30 2.3.4 Environmental Issues Associated with Bioreduction .......................................................... 30 2.3.5 How Bioreduction Tracks to Each of the Six Disposal Options ......................................... 31 2.3.6 Vendors and Cost for Bioreduction..................................................................................... 32 ii Identification and Screening of Infectious Carcass Pretreatment Alternatives 2.4 Alkaline Hydrolysis .................................................................................................................... 32 2.4.1 Definition of Alkaline Hydrolysis ....................................................................................... 32 2.4.2 Application of Alkaline Hydrolysis .................................................................................... 32 2.4.3 Operational Capacity ........................................................................................................... 33 2.4.4 Environmental Issues Associated with Alkaline Hydrolysis .............................................. 34 2.4.5 How Alkaline Hydrolysis Tracks to Each of the Six Disposal Options .............................. 35 2.4.6 Vendors and Cost for Alkaline Hydrolysis ......................................................................... 35 2.5 Steam Sterilization ...................................................................................................................... 36 2.5.1 Definition ............................................................................................................................ 36 2.5.2 Application .......................................................................................................................... 36 2.5.3 Operational Capacity ........................................................................................................... 38 2.5.4 Environmental Issues Associated with Steam Sterilization ................................................ 38 2.5.5 How Steam Sterilization Tracks to Each of the Six Disposal Options ............................... 38 2.5.6 Vendors and Cost for Steam Sterilization ........................................................................... 39 2.6 Freezing....................................................................................................................................... 39 2.6.1 Definition of Freezing ......................................................................................................... 39 2.6.2 Application of Freezing ...................................................................................................... 39 2.6.3 Operational Capacity ........................................................................................................... 41 2.6.4 Environmental Issues Associated with Freezing ................................................................. 41 2.6.5 How Freezing Tracks to Each of the Six Disposal Options ................................................ 41 2.6.6 Vendors and Cost for Freezing ..........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Theory Discussion
    02 Theory discussion 16 2.1 Introduction Corpse Disposal Methods This thesis aims to design a burial site, which practices sustainable corpse disposal, prevents placelessness through locally grounding, and focuses on the experience of the living user. This theory chapter is divided into two sections: 1. Sustainable corpse disposal 2. Placelessness and user experience In the first section current corpse disposal methods as well as the influence of culture on selecting how to dispose of a loved one’s corpse is discussed. Following this, sustainable and appropriate corpse disposal methods for this thesis is selected and explained. Section two is a theoretical discussion on the loss of identity and increased placelessness of cemeteries, as well as how the experience of the user can be made meaningful through a narrated landscape. Section 1: Sustainable corpse disposal 2.2 Unsustainable burial practice Figure 7. Current corpse disposal methods (Author 2015). Johannesburg’s Cemeteries are quickly filling up and the city is rapidly running out of burial space (SAPA 2010). This calls for a change in the long established conventional burial, is the placing of a corpse underground in a casket or coffin custom of traditional burial. A less land intensive and more sustainable corpse (Leuta & Green 2011). The grave is traditionally marked with a tombstone to disposal method is required. Cremation and traditional burial are the only legal commemorate the deceased. body disposal methods in South Africa, however many other methods are used internationally; Figure 7 illustrates some of these methods. The coffin is lowered two meter into the soil and covered with the backfill soil.
    [Show full text]
  • Architecture of Afterlife: Future Cemetery in Metropolis
    ARCHITECTURE OF AFTERLIFE: FUTURE CEMETERY IN METROPOLIS A DARCH PROJECT SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I AT MĀNOA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF ARCHITECTURE MAY 2017 BY SHIYU SONG DArch Committee: Joyce Noe, Chairperson William Chapman Brian Takahashi Key Words: Conventional Cemetery, Contemporary Cemetery, Future Cemetery, High-technology Innovation Architecture of Afterlife: Future Cemetery in Metropolis Shiyu Song April 2017 We certify that we have read this Doctorate Project and that, in our opinion, it is satisfactory in scope and quality in partial fulfillment for the degree of Doctor of Architecture in the School of Architecture, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa. Doctorate Project Committee ___________________________________ Joyce Noe ___________________________________ William Chapman ___________________________________ Brian Takahashi Acknowledgments I dedicate this thesis to everyone in my life. I would like to express my deepest appreciation to my committee chair, Professor Joyce Noe, for her support, guidance and insight throughout this doctoral project. Many thanks to my wonderful committee members William Chapman and Brian Takahashi for their precious and valuable guidance and support. Salute to my dear professor Spencer Leineweber who inspires me in spirit and work ethic. Thanks to all the professors for your teaching and encouragement imparted on me throughout my years of study. After all these years of study, finally, I understand why we need to study and how important education is. Overall, this dissertation is an emotional research product. As an idealist, I choose this topic as a lesson for myself to understand life through death. The more I delve into the notion of death, the better I appreciate life itself, and knowing every individual human being is a bless; everyday is a present is my best learning outcome.
    [Show full text]
  • Reclaiming Your Right to Rest in the Earth: Educating for and Creating a Green Jewish Cemetery
    Reclaiming Your Right to Rest in the Earth: Educating for and Creating a Green Jewish Cemetery “…Until you return to the ground - For from it you were taken, For dust you are, And to dust you shall return.” Bere’shit 3:19 Jews traditionally bury their dead. This method of disposing of a dead body is based on the text, Deuteronomy 34:6, in which God is said to bury Moses. (1) A Talmudic text, Sota 14a, makes it clear that we are to follow this example:”. as [God] buried the dead, so must you bury the dead.” (2) A second text cited to support burial as the proper means of disposing of a dead body is Deuteronomy 21:22-23, which states that even the body of a capital criminal, put to death on a stake, must be taken down and buried before nightfall in order not to cause “an affront to God” and not to “defile the land.”(3) Great leader or criminal, a Jew was to be buried after death. The stories of the Patriarchs and Matriarchs teach us that the dead were buried in caves. Abraham acquired “the cave in the field of Machpelah” specifically to serve as the burial place of Sarah.(4) Later texts teach us that this involved leaving a body to decompose in the cave and then collecting the bones together a year later. Sometimes the bones of all family members were mingled together in a pit, a true gathering of the deceased to the ancestors. This practice is known as ossilegium.(5) It is probably the case that there was an understanding that the decomposing of the body served as an atonement for an individual’s sins and left the soul ready to be with God.(6)That this normally happened in a year’s time coincides with the later practice of reciting kaddish for a year, cut short to eleven months out of concern that no parent should be publicly thought to need the full twelve months of time to atone for misdeeds By no means was the fleshy body to be preserved or protected from decomposition.
    [Show full text]
  • AVMA Guidelines for the Depopulation of Animals: 2019 Edition
    AVMA Guidelines for the Depopulation of Animals: 2019 Edition Members of the Panel on Animal Depopulation Steven Leary, DVM, DACLAM (Chair); Fidelis Pharmaceuticals, High Ridge, Missouri Raymond Anthony, PhD (Ethicist); University of Alaska Anchorage, Anchorage, Alaska Sharon Gwaltney-Brant, DVM, PhD, DABVT, DABT (Lead, Companion Animals Working Group); Veterinary Information Network, Mahomet, Illinois Samuel Cartner, DVM, PhD, DACLAM (Lead, Laboratory Animals Working Group); University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama Renee Dewell, DVM, MS (Lead, Bovine Working Group); Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa Patrick Webb, DVM (Lead, Swine Working Group); National Pork Board, Des Moines, Iowa Paul J. Plummer, DVM, DACVIM-LA (Lead, Small Ruminant Working Group); Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa Donald E. Hoenig, VMD (Lead, Poultry Working Group); American Humane Association, Belfast, Maine William Moyer, DVM, DACVSMR (Lead, Equine Working Group); Texas A&M University College of Veterinary Medicine, Billings, Montana Stephen A. Smith, DVM, PhD (Lead, Aquatics Working Group); Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Blacksburg, Virginia Andrea Goodnight, DVM (Lead, Zoo and Wildlife Working Group); The Living Desert Zoo and Gardens, Palm Desert, California P. Gary Egrie, VMD (nonvoting observing member); USDA APHIS Veterinary Services, Riverdale, Maryland Axel Wolff, DVM, MS (nonvoting observing member); Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare (OLAW), Bethesda, Maryland AVMA Staff Consultants Cia L. Johnson, DVM, MS, MSc; Director, Animal Welfare Division Emily Patterson-Kane, PhD; Animal Welfare Scientist, Animal Welfare Division The following individuals contributed substantively through their participation in the Panel’s Working Groups, and their assistance is sincerely appreciated. Companion Animals—Yvonne Bellay, DVM, MS; Allan Drusys, DVM, MVPHMgt; William Folger, DVM, MS, DABVP; Stephanie Janeczko, DVM, MS, DABVP, CAWA; Ellie Karlsson, DVM, DACLAM; Michael R.
    [Show full text]
  • Stillbirth and Intrauterine Fetal Death: Factors Affecting Determination of Cause Of
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UCL Discovery Stillbirth and intrauterine fetal death: factors affecting determination of cause of death at autopsy J. Man*†, J. C. Hutchinson*†, A.E.P. Heazell‡, M. Ashworth*, S. Levine § and N. J. Sebire*† *Department of Histopathology, Camelia Botnar Laboratories, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK; †University College London, Institute of Child Health, London, UK; ‡Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Manchester University, Manchester, UK; §Department of Histopathology, St George’s Hospital, London, UK Correspondence to: Prof. N. J. Sebire, Department of Histopathology, Level 3 Camelia Botnar, Laboratories, Great Ormond Street Hospital, Great Ormond Street, London WC1N 3JH, UK (e-mail: [email protected]) Short title: Cause of stillbirth and IUFD KEYWORDS: ethnicity; maternal age; miscarriage; obesity; stillbirth 1 +A: Abstract Objectives There have been many attempts to classify cause of death in stillbirth, all such systems being subjective, allowing for significant observer bias, making accurate comparisons between systems challenging. The aim of this study was to examine factors relating to determination of cause of death by using a large dataset from two specialist centres, in which observer bias has been reduced by objectively classifying findings and assigning causes of death based on predetermined criteria. Methods Detailed autopsy reports from intrauterine fetal deaths (IUFD) during 2005- 2013 in the second and third trimesters were reviewed and findings entered into a specially designed database, in which cause of death (CoD) was assigned using predefined objective criteria. Data regarding CoD categories and factors affecting determination of CoD were analysed through queries and statistical tests run using Microsoft Access, Excel, Graph Pad Prism and StatsDirect, with Mann–Whitney U-test and comparison of proportions testing as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • The 9Th SIDS International Conference Program and Abstracts
    Program and Abstracts The 9th SIDS The9th International Conference SIDS International June 1-4 2006 in YOKOHAMA Conference June 1-4 2006 in YOKOHAMA www.sids.gr.jp Co-sponsored by The Japan SIDS Research Society and SIDS Family Association Japan Meeting with the International Stillbirth Alliance (ISA) and the International Society for the Study and Prevention of Infant Deaths (ISPID) Program and Abstracts Secretariat PROTECTING LITTLE LIVES, PROVIDING A GUIDING LIGHT FOR FAMILIES General lnquiry : SIDS Family Association Japan 6-20-209 Udagawa-cho, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo 150-0042, Japan Phone/Fax : +81-3-5456-1661 Email : [email protected] Registration Secretariat : c/o Congress Corporation Kosai-kaikan Bldg., 5-1 Kojimachi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 102-8481, Japan Phone : +81-3-5216-5551 Fax : +81-3-5216-5552 Email : [email protected] Federation of Pharmaceutical WAM Manufacturers' Associations of JAPAN The 9th SIDS International Conference Program and Abstracts Table of Contents Welcome .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Greeting from Her Imperial Highness Princess Takamado ................................ 2 Thanks to our Sponsors!.............................................................................................................. 3 Access Map ............................................................................................................................................ 5 Floor Plan ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Introduction
    1. Introduction Life has many seasons. Nature functions according to these seasons. Seasons bring change, not only the change in the weather, but also physical change. The cycle of life is analogous to a tree: it grows and withers and the cycle of life repeats itself with death, never achieving finality. Death becomes an event in the cycle of life, contributing to it. The cycle of life refers to a developmental process, to generations that transcend the single lifetime of one individual (O’Rand & Krecker, 1990: 241). Bachelard (1994) explains life, with reference to human life, in the light of Minkowski’s “Vers une Cosmologie”, that the essence of life is not a “feeling of being, of existence,” but a feeling of participation, necessarily expressed in terms of time and secondarily expressed in terms of space. It can be understood that the cycle of life or the very sense of life is quite different from the temporality or participation of human life (McNeill, 2006: 2). The distinction between human life and the cycle of life is evident when exploring the physical world we live in. Our cities were established centuries ago and are still functioning. Since 2007 urban environments have provided sustenance to more than half the world population (Burdett & Judjic, 2007: 8). 1 Unfortunately, death and life do not receive the same level of acknowledgement in our urban environments. To protect ourselves, we have removed death from our everyday life by relegating it to mass horizontal cemeteries on the periphery of our manmade landscapes (Harries, 1998: 294). The hurt and suffering brought on by the loss of life has been shunned from our everyday life (Kubler- Ross, 1981: 11).
    [Show full text]
  • ALTERNATIVE KEVURA METHODS Jeremy Kalmanofsky
    Kalmanofsky, Spring 2017 Alternative Kevura Methods ALTERNATIVE KEVURA METHODS Jeremy Kalmanofsky This teshuvah was adopted by the CJLS on June 7, 2017, by a vote of 10 in favor, 7 opposed, and 3 abstaining. Members voting in favor: Rabbis Aaron Alexander, Pamela Barmash, Noah Bickart, Elliot Dorff, Joshua Heller, Jeremy Kalmanofsky, Amy Levin, Daniel Nevins, Micah Peltz, Avram Reisner and David Schuck. Members opposed: Rabbis Baruch Frydman-Kohl, Reuven Hammer, David Hoffman, Gail Labovitz, Jonathan Lubliner, and Paul Plotkin. Members abstaining: Rabbis Susan Grossman, Jan Kaufman, and Iscah Waldman, Question: Contemporary Jews sometimes seek alternative mortuary methods in order to be more ecologically sustainable and economical. Can Jews utilize alternative methods or is burial required? What does Halakhic tradition demand for how Jews treat dead bodies? Answer: The Torah’s very first chapters assert that human remains should decompose in the earth. Describing human mortality, God tells Adam [Genesis 3.19]: “You are dust and to dust you will return.” -Jewish treatment for human remains has always been in [לכתחילה] In this spirit, the optimal ground burial. The Torah legislates this norm at Deuteronomy 21:22-23:1 לֹא-תָלִין נִבְ לָתֹו עַל-הָעֵץ, כִ י-קָ בֹור תִ קְבְרֶ ּנּו בַּיֹום הַהּוא The Committee on Jewish Law and Standards of the Rabbinical Assembly provides guidance in matters of halkhhah for the Conservative movement. The individual rabbi, however, is the authority for the interpretation and application of all matters of halakhah. 1 This commandment comes in the context of the rules for executing criminals. It might seem off-putting to base the treatment of all bodies upon this unfortunate paradigm.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Remains and Identification
    Human remains and identification HUMAN REMAINS AND VIOLENCE Human remains and identification Human remains Human remains and identification presents a pioneering investigation into the practices and methodologies used in the search for and and identification exhumation of dead bodies resulting from mass violence. Previously absent from forensic debate, social scientists and historians here Mass violence, genocide, confront historical and contemporary exhumations with the application of social context to create an innovative and interdisciplinary dialogue. and the ‘forensic turn’ Never before has a single volume examined the context of motivations and interests behind these pursuits, each chapter enlightening the Edited by ÉLISABETH ANSTETT political, social, and legal aspects of mass crime and its aftermaths. and JEAN-MARC DREYFUS The book argues that the emergence of new technologies to facilitate the identification of dead bodies has led to a ‘forensic turn’, normalizing exhumations as a method of dealing with human remains en masse. However, are these exhumations always made for legitimate reasons? And what can we learn about societies from the way in which they deal with this consequence of mass violence? Multidisciplinary in scope, this book presents a ground-breaking selection of international case studies, including the identification of corpses by the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, the resurfacing ANSTETTand of human remains from the Gulag and the sites of Jewish massacres from the Holocaust. Human remains
    [Show full text]
  • Report of Fetal Death Worksheet
    Report of Fetal Death Worksheet We are truly sorry about the loss you have experienced. We understand that this is a difficult time for you and your loved ones. We need to ask you a few questions to assist in the completion of the official report of fetal death. State laws provide protection against the unauthorized release of identifying information from the report of fetal death to ensure confidentiality of the parents. This information may also help researchers understand some of the factors that are related to miscarriage and stillbirth. Your assistance in providing complete and accurate information is very important. We appreciate your help, especially during this very difficult time. PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY Please note: If delivery occurred in a hospital, nursing care institution, or hospice inpatient facility, the Human Remains Release Form (HRRF) must be completed (reference A.R.S. §36-326 and A.A.C. R9-19-301.) Funeral Home/County Information Available for Disposition: Yes No Fetus Information Name of Fetus-- This is optional. Fetus Not Named 1A. FETUS FIRST NAME 1B. MIDDLE NAME 1C. LAST NAME 1D. SUFFIX (Jr, II, etc) 2. DATE OF DELIVERY (mm/dd/yyyy) 3. TIME OF DELIVERY 4. FETUS SEX 5. HRRF (Human Remains Release Form) AM PM Military Male Female Yes No _____________ ( mm/dd/yyyy) Unknown Unknown Mother’s Information 6A. MOTHER’S CURRENT LEGAL NAME – FIRST NAME 6B. MIDDLE NAME 6C. LAST NAME 6D. SUFFIX (Jr, II, etc) 7A. MOTHER’S NAME PRIOR TO FIRST MARRIAGE – FIRST NAME 7B. MIDDLE NAME 7C. LAST NAME 7D. SUFFIX (Jr, II, etc) 8A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Common Imaging and Maceration Techniques on DNA Recovery from Skeletal Remains
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 12-2012 The Effect of Common Imaging and Maceration Techniques on DNA Recovery from Skeletal Remains Emilie Margaret Frank [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Recommended Citation Frank, Emilie Margaret, "The Effect of Common Imaging and Maceration Techniques on DNA Recovery from Skeletal Remains. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2012. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/1376 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Emilie Margaret Frank entitled "The Effect of Common Imaging and Maceration Techniques on DNA Recovery from Skeletal Remains." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in Anthropology. Amy Z. Mundorff, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Graciela S. Cabana, Dawnie Wolfe Steadman Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) The Effect of Common Imaging and Maceration Techniques on DNA Recovery from Skeletal Remains A Thesis Presented for the Master of Arts Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Emilie Margaret Frank December 2012 DEDICATION To Drs.
    [Show full text]
  • Poultry Industry Manual
    POULTRY INDUSTRY MANUAL FAD PReP Foreign Animal Disease Preparedness & Response Plan National Animal Health Emergency Management System United States Department of Agriculture • Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service • Veterinary Services MARCH 2013 Poultry Industry Manual The Foreign Animal Disease Preparedness and Response Plan (FAD PReP)/National Animal Health Emergency Management System (NAHEMS) Guidelines provide a framework for use in dealing with an animal health emergency in the United States. This FAD PReP Industry Manual was produced by the Center for Food Security and Public Health, Iowa State University of Science and Technology, College of Veterinary Medicine, in collaboration with the U.S. Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service through a cooperative agreement. The FAD PReP Poultry Industry Manual was last updated in March 2013. Please send questions or comments to: Center for Food Security and Public Health National Center for Animal Health 2160 Veterinary Medicine Emergency Management Iowa State University of Science and Technology US Department of Agriculture (USDA) Ames, IA 50011 Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Telephone: 515-294-1492 U.S. Department of Agriculture Fax: 515-294-8259 4700 River Road, Unit 41 Email: [email protected] Riverdale, Maryland 20737-1231 subject line FAD PReP Poultry Industry Manual Telephone: (301) 851-3595 Fax: (301) 734-7817 E-mail: [email protected] While best efforts have been used in developing and preparing the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines, the US Government, US Department of Agriculture and the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service and other parties, such as employees and contractors contributing to this document, neither warrant nor assume any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information or procedure disclosed.
    [Show full text]