DOCSLIB.ORG

Sullivan Berkeley 0028E 12548.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sullivan Berkeley 0028E 12548.Pdf CHAPTER 1 HISTORY OF WAR POWERS: USE AND MISUSE 1.1: INTRODUCTION In a previous paper written for Professor Geoffrey Hazard (“Much Yoo About Nothing”), I discussed legal heavyweight John Yoo and how the U.S. justifies the “war- like” actions of its Government. I argued that the Bush Administration will be remembered not only for its blunder of invading Iraq and failure to find Weapons of Mass Destruction, but also for its redefinition of the declaration of war1 and “torture.”2 I explored how the language used to describe war-making and military activities has been manipulated and reinterpreted to the point where it permits the illegal declaration of war. This chapter seeks to answer what are the limits to the president’s power to commit U.S. military forces to foreign conflicts and whether Congress has the ability to curtail the exercise of that executive power? As part of 1 Draft Memorandum from John Yoo, Deputy Assistant Att'y Gen., Office of Legal Counsel, and Robert J. Delahunty, Special Counsel, Office of Legal Counsel, to William J. Haynes II, Gen. Counsel, U.S. Dep't of Def. (Jan. 9, 2002), in The Torture Papers, (regarding the "Application of Treaties and Laws to al Qaeda and Taliban Detainees"). See also John Yoo, War by Other Means: An Insider's Account of the War on Terror 118-21 (2006); see also Stephen Holmes, John Yoo's Tortured Logic, Nation, May 1, 2006, at 31, 38 (book review) ("By claiming that the Framers themselves would have been perfectly happy with unchecked presidential power, [they] encourage people to believe in the deep fidelity of a constitutionally unleashed President to an ideal America that was always meant to be."). 2 John Yoo states: "[A] declaration of war served the purpose of notifying the enemy, allies, neutrals, and one's own citizens of a change in the state of relations between one nation and another. In none of these situations did a declaration of war serve as a vehicle for domestically deciding on or authorizing a war." See John C. Yoo, The Continuation of Politics by Other Means: The Original Understanding of War Powers, 84 Cal. L. Rev. 167, 196- 241 (1996). Yoo also claims "[T]he Declare War Clause gives Congress the power to 'declare' whether ... a certain state of affairs legally constitutes a war, which then gives it the authority to enact wartime regulations of individual persons and property both within and outside the United States." See John C. Yoo, The Powers of War and Peace: The Constitution and Foreign Affairs After 9/11, at 332 (2005). 1 the checks and balances the U.S. established during the birth of the nation, the framers of the Constitution set aside specific military-related responsibilities for the executive and legislative branches in order to force them to share the power to wage war. Throughout history, several key events have revealed where and with whom these imbalances lie. During the Cold War and the Korean War, Harry S. Truman began a presidential trend to exercise executive power to conduct military operations without seeking the authorization of Congress. Wars of this century are unlike any of the wars during the time of the Framers. The threat of communism changed the way Americans thought about combat, followed by the more recent dramatic changes of 9/11, asymmetric warfare, terrorism, and nuclear weapons. Thus, we should find that contemporary conflicts have changed the way the U.S. perceives its enemies, as well as the system of checks and balances that regulate the way those enemies are fought. The first section of this chapter will discuss the early treatment of the issue of war powers as viewed by the Founding Fathers, followed by a section on how the presidents and Congress exercised war powers during the Korean, Vietnam, and Iraq wars, as well as the more recent intervention in Libya. This discussion will examine the legal justifications offered for presidential action during conflict and how presidential and congressional behavior has evolved as a result of legal and historical precedent. This chapter will examine four significant historical examples where presidents have used executive power to deploy U.S. military forces overseas without seeking prior approval of Congress. Through the presidential actions and congressional responses to Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, and Libya, we can examine the ways in which presidents have circumvented the congressional authority to declare war. By beginning with a comparison with the early history of the country and the Founding Fathers, we can follow the evolution of the use of those powers. And by looking to examples of the ways in which Congress has used its own power to deflect presidential power, we can see the effectiveness of the checks and balances as they currently exist. Finally, this chapter will discuss what constitutional and legal precedents presidents have used to justify the exercise of their power, as well as the congressional rights and responsibilities to declare war and regulate combat activities. 2 1.2: EARLY HISTORY OF THE USE OF WAR POWERS In the discussion of the early history of war powers, I will do my best to avoid “law office history”3 in which quotations are “torn out of context and inserted where they appear useful to a legal argument”4 or relying on “a few selective quotes from famous Framers at the Philadelphia Convention.”5 For some time before the Constitution was drafted and the U.S. won its independence, Americans understood that commencing war was for all intents and purposes, “declaring” war. In 1756, after King George II had already formally declared war on the French, he sent Major George Washington to carry out the attack. At that time, George Washington was concerned with how exactly the declaration of war was to be carried out.6 The message he received from the Virginia Lieutenant Governor, Robert Dinwiddie (a servant of the Crown), was essentially that if Washington commenced warfare, he would be “declaring” war.7 There are several other instances in the early history of the United States where claims were made that the “invasion of property, among all Nations, is...a declaration of war”8 or “cutting off the head is looked upon by those who are acquainted with the customs of Indians as a declaration of war.”9 The first Commanders in Chief of the United States were fully aware of the fact that the Constitution did not 3 John Yoo, “Clio at War: The Misuse of History in the War Powers Debate.” 70 U. COLO. L. REV. 1169, 1174 (1999). 4Id. 5Id. 6Letter from George Washington to Robert Dinwiddie (Aug. 14, 1756), American Memory from the Library of Congress. http://rs6.loc.gov/ammem/gwhtml/gwseries2.html (select Letter Book 3 for copy of letter). 7 Letter from Robert Dinwiddie to George Washington (Aug. 21, 1756), American Memory from the Library of Congress. http://www.loc.gov/fedsearch/metasearch/?cclquery=Robert+Dinwid die#query=(Robert%20Dinwiddie)&filter=pz:id=lcweb|ammem|catalog |ppoc|thomas 8Junius Americanus (pseudonym), Address to General Gage (May 29, 1775), American Archives, Documents of the American Revolution. http://colet.uchicago.edu/cgibin/amarch/getdoc.pl?/projects/art flb/databases/efts/AmArch/IMAGE/.3187 9George H. Bray III, Scalping During the French and Indian War, Archiving Early America. http://www.earlyamerica.com/review/1998/scalping.html 3 permit them to wage war unilaterally.10 Some of these first leaders went so far as to believe that even when another nation had declared war upon the United States, that even then the Presidents believed they needed Congressional approval. First U.S. President, George Washington, faced two such offensives from Indian nations, and he firmly held that Congress had to authorize offensive actions against these nations: "The constitution vests the power of declaring war in Congress; therefore no offensive expedition of importance can be undertaken” against the “refractory part of the Creek nation . until after [Congress] shall have deliberated upon the subject, and authorized such a measure,” he observed.11 George Washington was very clear in his deference to Congress on the issue of war powers. George Washington's War Secretary Henry Knox wrote to the President that “[a]ll measures of an offensive nature (against the Cherokee tribes) be restrained until the meeting of Congress, to whom belong the powers of war.”12 Knox claimed that Secretary of State, Thomas Jefferson and Treasury Secretary, Alexander Hamilton, unanimously agreed,13 but Knox may have been overstating the views of Washington's cabinet.14 10Yoo's classification as a “textualist” is said to be inspired by Justice Scalia's views on statutory and constitutional interpretation. See Antonin Scalia, Common-Law Courts in a Civil-Law System: The Role of United States Federal Courts in Interpreting the Constitution and Laws, is A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law 3, 22-23 (Amy Gutmann ed., 1997) ("The text is the law, and it is the text that must be observed. I agree with Justice Holmes[] ...: 'We do not inquire what the legislature meant; we ask only what the statute means."'). 11Letter from George Washington to William Moultrie (Aug. 28, 1793), in The Writings of George Washington 366, 367 (Jared Sparks ed., Boston, Little, Brown, & Co. 1855), available at http://rs6.loc.gov/cgibin/query/r?ammem/mgw:@field(DOCID+@lit(g w330067)) 12Letter from Henry Knox to George Washington (Oct. 9, 1792), in The Papers of George Washington: Presidential Series, Presidential Series 212 (Mark A. Mastromarino ed., 1996). 13 Id. 14See Lucius Crassus. Not all
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Geopolitics, Oil Law Reform, and Commodity Market Expectations
    OKLAHOMA LAW REVIEW VOLUME 63 WINTER 2011 NUMBER 2 GEOPOLITICS, OIL LAW REFORM, AND COMMODITY MARKET EXPECTATIONS ROBERT BEJESKY * Table of Contents I. Introduction .................................... ........... 193 II. Geopolitics and Market Equilibrium . .............. 197 III. Historical U.S. Foreign Policy in the Middle East ................ 202 IV. Enter OPEC ..................................... ......... 210 V. Oil Industry Reform Planning for Iraq . ............... 215 VI. Occupation Announcements and Economics . ........... 228 VII. Iraq’s 2007 Oil and Gas Bill . .............. 237 VIII. Oil Price Surges . ............ 249 IX. Strategic Interests in Afghanistan . ................ 265 X. Conclusion ...................................... ......... 273 I. Introduction The 1973 oil supply shock elevated OPEC to world attention and ensconced it in the general consciousness as a confederacy that is potentially * M.A. Political Science (Michigan), M.A. Applied Economics (Michigan), LL.M. International Law (Georgetown). The author has taught international law courses for Cooley Law School and the Department of Political Science at the University of Michigan, American Government and Constitutional Law courses for Alma College, and business law courses at Central Michigan University and the University of Miami. 193 194 OKLAHOMA LAW REVIEW [Vol. 63:193 antithetical to global energy needs. From 1986 until mid-1999, prices generally fluctuated within a $10 to $20 per barrel band, but alarms sounded when market prices started hovering above $30. 1 In July 2001, Senator Arlen Specter addressed the Senate regarding the need to confront OPEC and urged President Bush to file an International Court of Justice case against the organization, on the basis that perceived antitrust violations were a breach of “general principles of law.” 2 Prices dipped initially, but began a precipitous rise in mid-March 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • Presidential Documents
    Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Monday, August 2, 2004 Volume 40—Number 31 Pages 1379–1394 VerDate jul 14 2003 12:34 Aug 03, 2004 Jkt 203001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 1249 Sfmt 1249 E:\PRESDOCS\P31JYF4.030 P31JYF4 Contents Addresses and Remarks Proclamations Missouri, Springfield—1385 Anniversary of the Americans With Radio address—1379 Disabilities Act—1380 Communications to Congress Parents’ Day—1379 Termination of the national emergency Statements by the President declared in Executive Order 12722 with Methane to Markets Partnership—1381 respect to Iraq and modification of related Progress in homeownership—1382 Executive orders, letter transmitting Executive order—1384 Supplementary Materials Executive Orders Acts approved by the President—1394 Termination of Emergency Declared in Checklist of White House press releases— Executive Order 12722 With Respect to 1394 Iraq and Modification of Executive Order Digest of other White House 13290, Executive Order 13303, and announcements—1392 Executive Order 13315—1382 Nominations submitted to the Senate—1394 Editor’s Note: The President was in Cleveland, OH, on July 30, the closing date of this issue. Releases and announcements issued by the Office of the Press Secretary but not received in time for inclusion in this issue will be printed next week. WEEKLY COMPILATION OF Distribution is made only by the Superintendent of Docu- PRESIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS ments, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. The Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents will be furnished by mail to domestic subscribers for $80.00 per year Published every Monday by the Office of the Federal Reg- ($137.00 for mailing first class) and to foreign subscribers for ister, National Archives and Records Administration, Washing- $93.75 per year, payable to the Superintendent of Documents, ton, DC 20408, the Weekly Compilation of Presidential Docu- Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement on Progress in Homeownership July 29, 2004
    July 28 / Administration of George W. Bush, 2004 Environmental Protection Agency Adminis- meeting of the founding international part- trator Mike Leavitt, working closely with ners later this year. I look forward to work- the Department of State, the Department ing closely with our international partners of Energy, and the United States Agency to achieve the Partnership’s important for International Development. Adminis- goals. trator Leavitt will host a ministerial-level Statement on Progress in Homeownership July 29, 2004 My administration has put forward an ag- new record for homeownership, and today, gressive agenda to help all Americans—es- more Americans, including minorities, own pecially first-time homeowners, low-income their own home than ever before. We will families, and minorities—achieve the dream continue to usher in a new era of owner- of owning their own home. Today’s home- ship by providing additional opportunities ownership statistics show that we are mak- for all Americans to realize the American ing significant progress in building an own- Dream. ership society in America. We have set a Letter to Congressional Leaders Transmitting the Executive Order on Termination of the National Emergency Declared in Executive Order 12722 With Respect to Iraq and Modification of Related Executive Orders July 29, 2004 Dear Mr. Speaker: (Dear Mr. President:) Executive Order 12722 of August 2, Consistent with subsection 204(b) of the 1990, imposed sanctions on Iraq in re- International Emergency Economic Powers sponse to its invasion of Kuwait and other Act, 50 U.S.C. 1703(b) (IEEPA), I hereby actions. Those sanctions were modified in report that I have issued an Executive Executive Order 12724 of August 9, 1990, Order (this ‘‘order’’) in which I terminate in light of United Nations Security Council the national emergency declared in Execu- Resolution (UNSCR) 661 of August 6, tive Order 12722 of August 2, 1990, amend 1990, which also imposed sanctions on Iraq.
    [Show full text]
  • Hd213-Xxx.Ps
    1 108th Congress, 2d Session – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 108–213 TERMINATION OF THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY WITH RESPECT TO IRAQ COMMUNICATION FROM THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES TRANSMITTING NOTIFICATION TO TERMINATE THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY WITH RESPECT TO IRAQ IN EXECUTIVE ORDER 12722 OF AUGUST 2, 1990, MODIFIED IN EXECUTIVE ORDER 13290 OF MARCH 20, 2003, EXECUTIVE ORDER 13303 OF MAY 22, 2003, AND EXECUTIVE ORDER 13315 OF AUGUST 28, 2003, PURSUANT TO 50 U.S.C. 1622(a) SEPTEMBER 13, 2004.—Referred to the Committee on International Relations and ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 29–011 WASHINGTON : 2004 VerDate Aug 04 2004 06:29 Sep 14, 2004 Jkt 029006 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4012 Sfmt 4012 E:\HR\OC\HD213.XXX HD213 E:\Seals\Congress.#13 VerDate Aug 04 2004 06:29 Sep 14, 2004 Jkt 029006 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4012 Sfmt 4012 E:\HR\OC\HD213.XXX HD213 THE WHITE HOUSE, Washington, July 29, 2004. Hon. J. DENNIS HASTERT, Speaker of the House of Representatives, Washington, DC. DEAR MR. SPEAKER: Consistent with subsection 304(b) of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, 50 U.S.C. 1703(b) (IEEPA), I hereby report that I have issued an Executive Order (this ‘‘order’’) in which I terminate the national emergency declared in Executive Order 12722 of August 2, 1990, amend Executive Order 13290 of March 20, 2003, and take additional steps regard- ing the national emergency I declared in Executive Order 13303 of May 22, 2003, and expanded in Executive Order 13315 of August 28, 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Us Foreign Policy and Energy Resources During the George W
    US FOREIGN POLICY AND ENERGY RESOURCES DURING THE GEORGE W. BUSH ADMINISTRATION by AHMED SAMIR SAYED MAHDI A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of American and Canadian Studies School of Historical Studies University of Birmingham January 2010 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT Based on the Open Door Policy, the United States has pursued an informal empire based on spreading its economic influence by ensuring open access to vital goods and raw materials, and establishing military presence in areas of interest, as America’s corporate and strategic interests worked together in harmony. This approach has been especially evident in energy-producing regions, where the US seeks to establish economic and military dominance to support its global economic power. George W. Bush, like all his predecessors, pursued the Open Door Empire, especially with respect to access to foreign energy resources, which took on an even higher priority because of his ties to the oil industry and the belief that the US was suffering from an energy crisis and relative economic decline.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Economy of Accounting and the 2003 Iraq War
    University of Wollongong Research Online University of Wollongong Thesis Collection 2017+ University of Wollongong Thesis Collections 2017 The Political Economy of Accounting and the 2003 Iraq War Hoda Abdul Fattah University of Wollongong Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/theses1 University of Wollongong Copyright Warning You may print or download ONE copy of this document for the purpose of your own research or study. The University does not authorise you to copy, communicate or otherwise make available electronically to any other person any copyright material contained on this site. You are reminded of the following: This work is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this work may be reproduced by any process, nor may any other exclusive right be exercised, without the permission of the author. Copyright owners are entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. A reproduction of material that is protected by copyright may be a copyright infringement. A court may impose penalties and award damages in relation to offences and infringements relating to copyright material. Higher penalties may apply, and higher damages may be awarded, for offences and infringements involving the conversion of material into digital or electronic form. Unless otherwise indicated, the views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the University of Wollongong. Recommended Citation Abdul Fattah, Hoda, The Political Economy of Accounting and the 2003 Iraq War, Doctor of Philosophy thesis, School of Accounting, Economics and Finance, University of Wollongong, 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Iraq: Post-Saddam Governance and Security
    Iraq: Post-Saddam Governance and Security Kenneth Katzman Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs October 28, 2009 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL31339 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Iraq: Post-Saddam Governance and Security Summary The Obama Administration is facing a security environment in Iraq vastly improved over that which prevailed during 2005-2007, although still not completely peaceful or without potential to deteriorate significantly. The overall frequency of violence is down to post-Saddam low levels, yet, since May 2009, insurgents have increased high profile attacks and the Obama Administration appears increasingly concerned about Iraq’s ability to maintain security. These attacks did not derail the June 30, 2009, U.S. withdrawal of combat troops from major cities and have not, to date, caused a modification of the February 27, 2009, announcement by President Obama that all U.S. combat brigades would be withdrawn by August 31, 2010. This would leave a residual presence of 35,000–50,000 U.S. trainers, advisers, and mentors, with these to be withdrawn by the end of 2011. The drawdown is in line with a U.S.-Iraq “Security Agreement” that took effect January 1, 2009. Despite the fact that recent high profile attacks have not stimulated a return to sectarian warfare in Iraq, some U.S. officials believe that a U.S. military presence might be needed beyond 2011 to ensure further political progress and produce a unified, democratic Iraq that can govern and defend itself and is an ally in the war on terror.
    [Show full text]
  • Iraq Stabilization and Insurgency Sanctions
    Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 176 / Monday, September 13, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 55463 SUMMARY: The Department of the the exportation of any goods, are inapplicable. Because no notice of Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets technology, or services from the United proposed rulemaking is required for this Control (‘‘OFAC’’) is implementing States to Iraq. Executive Order 12722 rule, the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 Executive Order 13350 of July 29, 2004, also prohibited transactions relating to U.S.C. 601–612) does not apply. which terminated the national transportation and travel to or from Iraq Paperwork Reduction Act emergency declared with respect to Iraq by United States citizens or permanent in Executive Order 12722 of August 2, resident aliens. The subsequent The Paperwork Reduction Act does 1990, and revoked that and subsequent Executive orders took various additional not apply because this rule does not Executive orders, by removing the Iraqi steps with respect to the situation in impose information collection Sanctions Regulations from the Code of Iraq. requirements that would require the Federal Regulations. Section 207(a) of the International approval of the Office of Management DATES: Effective Date: September 13, Emergency Economic Powers Act and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. 2010. (‘‘IEEPA’’) (50 U.S.C. 1706(a)) contains a provision that allows the President to List of Subjects in 31 CFR Part 575 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: continue to prohibit transactions Assistant Director for Compliance, Administrative
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Order 13350
    Friday, July 30, 2004 Part VI The President Executive Order 13350—Termination of Emergency Declared in Executive Order 12722 With Respect to Iraq and Modification of Executive Order 13290, Executive Order 13303, and Executive Order 13315 VerDate jul<14>2003 20:07 Jul 29, 2004 Jkt 203001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\30JYE0.SGM 30JYE0 VerDate jul<14>2003 20:07 Jul 29, 2004 Jkt 203001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\30JYE0.SGM 30JYE0 46055 Federal Register Presidential Documents Vol. 69, No. 146 Friday, July 30, 2004 Title 3— Executive Order 13350 of July 29, 2004 The President Termination of Emergency Declared in Executive Order 12722 With Respect to Iraq and Modification of Executive Order 13290, Executive Order 13303, and Executive Order 13315 By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.)(IEEPA), the National Emer- gencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.)(NEA), section 5 of the United Nations Participation Act, as amended (22 U.S.C. 287c)(UNPA), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, have determined that the situation that gave rise to the declaration of a national emergency with respect to Iraq in Executive Order 12722 of August 2, 1990, has been significantly altered by the removal of the regime of Saddam Hussein and other developments.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement on Progress in Homeownership July
    1382 July 28 / Administration of George W. Bush, 2004 Under the Partnership, members will work Executive Order 13350— in coordination with the private sector to Termination of Emergency Declared share and expand the use of technologies to in Executive Order 12722 With capture methane emissions that are now Respect to Iraq and Modification of wasted in the course of industrial processes Executive Order 13290, Executive and use them as a new energy source. The Order 13303, and Executive Order important benefits of this international part- 13315 nership include improved energy security and air quality from the use of clean-burning July 29, 2004 methane as natural gas, improved coal mine By the authority vested in me as President safety, enhanced economic growth, and re- by the Constitution and laws of the United duced greenhouse gas emissions of methane. States of America, including the Inter- The Partnership will be led by Environ- national Emergency Economic Powers Act mental Protection Agency Administrator (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.)(IEEPA), the Na- Mike Leavitt, working closely with the De- tional Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et partment of State, the Department of En- seq.)(NEA), section 5 of the United Nations ergy, and the United States Agency for Inter- Participation Act, as amended (22 U.S.C. national Development. Administrator Leavitt 287c)(UNPA), and section 301 of title 3, will host a ministerial-level meeting of the United States Code, founding international partners later this I, George W. Bush, President of the year. I look forward to working closely with United States of America, have determined our international partners to achieve the that the situation that gave rise to the dec- Partnership’s important goals.
    [Show full text]
  • US Killing of Qasem Soleimani
    U.S. Killing of Qasem Soleimani: Frequently Asked Questions Updated January 13, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46148 SUMMARY R46148 U.S. Killing of Qasem Soleimani: January 13, 2020 Frequently Asked Questions Clayton Thomas, The January 2, 2020, U.S. killing in Iraq of Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-Qods Force Coordinator (IRGC-QF) Commander Qasem Soleimani, generally regarded as one of the most powerful and Analyst in Middle Eastern important officials in Iran, has potentially dramatic implications for the United States. For Affairs Congress, it raises possible questions about U.S. policy in the Middle East, broader U.S. global strategy, U.S. relations with partners and allies, the authorization and legality of U.S. military action abroad, U.S. measures to protect its servicemembers and diplomatic personnel, and congressional oversight of these and related issues. This report provides background information in response to some frequently asked questions related to the strike and its aftermath, including Who was Qasem Soleimani and why did the U.S. military kill him? How have Iranians reacted? How have Iraqis reacted and how does this impact Iraqi policy and government formation? How might the strike and Iraqi reactions impact the U.S. military presence in Iraq and the U.S.-led counter- ISIS campaign (Operation Inherent Resolve)? How does the killing of Soleimani impact Israel and its security? What has been the European reaction? Under what authority did the U.S. military carry out the strike? How have Members of Congress responded legislatively or otherwise? What is the U.S. force posture in the region? How do recent regional developments align with broader U.S.
    [Show full text]