Fretilin Radio Link Reopened
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Racial Discrimination
Individuals 329 IX INDIVIDUALS Discrimination - racial discrimination - International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination - Articles 4 and 14 - Australian implementation On 21 August 1990 the Attorney-General, Mr Duffy, provided the following written answer in part to a question on notice (HR Deb 1990, Vol 172, p 1214): The only State which to date has legislated against racial vilification is New South Wales, which did so in 1989. No. Australia has made a reservation to Article 4. It is still too early to assess the effectiveness of the NSW legislation, and the Government is also awaiting the report of the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission's National Inquiry into Racist Violence. Article 14 of the Convention provides for States Parties to declare their recognition of the competence of the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination to receive and consider communications from individuals and groups within that State Party who have exhausted all available domestic remedies. Australia has not to date made such a declaration, but the issue is one that is on the agenda of the Standing Committee of Attorney-General for consideration, together with the related issues of the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (the ICCPR) and the declaration that may be made under Article 41 of the ICCPR. On 21 December 1990 the Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade, Senator Gareth Evans, provided the following written answer in part to a question on notice (HR Deb 1990, Vol174, pp 4999-5000): Since 1983, the Australian Government has undertaken extensive consultations with the State and Territory Governments in relation to accession to the First Optional Protocol, both individually and through the Standing Committee of Attorneys-General. -
Cooperating with ICSW, 1994 – 2003
Cooperating with ICSW, 1994 – 2003 John Langmore The ICSW had a vital role in the struggle for integration of social and economic policies in the 1990s and early 2000s. It is worth recalling those battles because of their formative influence and also because of their contemporary relevance. , After Prime Minister Thatcher and President Reagan adopted market fundamentalism as the ideological core of their economic strategies and the World Bank and IMF copied them, there were major consequences for people everywhere who relied on government social services. The availability and quality of health services, education and even public infrastructure were undermined to make way for reduced taxation for high income earners. A centrally important goal of social justice and human wellbeing became achieving rigorous balance between economic and social goals. President Mitterrand proposed that the UN hold a global conference to plan an international strategy aimed at fighting poverty, creating productive employment and strengthening social integration. The Danish Government offered to host the conference to be held in March 1995. As the Copenhagen Declaration on Social Development begins by saying: For the first time in history, at the invitation of the United Nations, we gather as heads of State and Government to recognise the significance of social development and human wellbeing for all and to give to these goals the highest priority both now and into the twenty-first century. Preparation for this summit created opportunities in many countries for the member organisations of the ICSW to intensify their national advocacy and lift it to a global level. For example, in Australia the Labor Government established a national committee to prepare for the World Summit for Social Development (WSSD), and Julian Disney the President of the Australian Council of Social Service (ACOSS), the Australian member of the ICSW, was appointed a member. -
Legislative Council
3960 Questions without Notice [COUNCIL what steps does the Government intend Legislative Council to take to implement those recommenda Wednesday, 2 December 1981 tions, particularly in light of the recently announced proposal to take over the Herald and Weekly Times organization? The PRESIDENT (the Hon. F. S. Grim The Hon. HAD DON STOREY wade) took the chair at 12.19 p.m. and (Attorney-General) -The Norris com read the prayer. mittee recommendations were far reach ing and very extensive in terms of the CREDIT BILL steps which may be taken in relation to the print media in this State. Accord This Bill was received from the ingly, the Government released the re Assembly and, on the motion of the Hon. port so everybody would have an oppor HADDON STOREY (Attorney-General), tunity to read it, to consider it and to was read a first time. make comment upon it. When the Gov ernment is in receipt of views or is in a GOODS (SALES AND LEASES) BILL position to receive views on that report. This Bill was received from the it will do so, but it has made no deter 'Assembly and, on the motion of the Hon. mination at this stage to implement the HADDON STOREY (Attorney-General), recommendations of that report. Cer was read a first time. tainly the Government will look at it and, in looking at it, will take note of CHATTEL .SECURITIES BILL the recently reported proposal referred This Bill was received from the to by Mr Landeryou. Assembly and, on the motion of the Hon. -
Ministerial Careers and Accountability in the Australian Commonwealth Government / Edited by Keith Dowding and Chris Lewis
AND MINISTERIAL CAREERS ACCOUNTABILITYIN THE AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH GOVERNMENT AND MINISTERIAL CAREERS ACCOUNTABILITYIN THE AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH GOVERNMENT Edited by Keith Dowding and Chris Lewis Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at http://epress.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: Ministerial careers and accountability in the Australian Commonwealth government / edited by Keith Dowding and Chris Lewis. ISBN: 9781922144003 (pbk.) 9781922144010 (ebook) Series: ANZSOG series Notes: Includes bibliographical references. Subjects: Politicians--Australia. Politicians--Australia--Ethical behavior. Political ethics--Australia. Politicians--Australia--Public opinion. Australia--Politics and government. Australia--Politics and government--Public opinion. Other Authors/Contributors: Dowding, Keith M. Lewis, Chris. Dewey Number: 324.220994 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU E Press Printed by Griffin Press This edition © 2012 ANU E Press Contents 1. Hiring, Firing, Roles and Responsibilities. 1 Keith Dowding and Chris Lewis 2. Ministers as Ministries and the Logic of their Collective Action . 15 John Wanna 3. Predicting Cabinet Ministers: A psychological approach ..... 35 Michael Dalvean 4. Democratic Ambivalence? Ministerial attitudes to party and parliamentary scrutiny ........................... 67 James Walter 5. Ministerial Accountability to Parliament ................ 95 Phil Larkin 6. The Pattern of Forced Exits from the Ministry ........... 115 Keith Dowding, Chris Lewis and Adam Packer 7. Ministers and Scandals ......................... -
(On) Racism Migration, Division, and Consent in Australia
Bordering (on) Racism Migration, Division, and Consent in Australia By DANIEL COTTON Department of Political Economy Honours Thesis: Submitted as partial requirement for the degree of BACHELOR OF ARTS (HONOURS), Political Economy, University of Sydney. 11TH OCTOBER 2017 STATEMENT This work contains no material which has been accepted for the award of another degree or diploma in any university, and to the best of my knowledge and belief, this thesis contains no material previously published or written by another person except where due references is made in the text of the thesis. i DEDICATION AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS hank you to the Gadigal people of the Eora nation, on whose country I lived and breathed throughout this thesis. Their fight against the brutal imposition of a Tborder erected to exclude them from their own country, ongoing since day one of colonialism, remains an inspiration for all who challenge the colonial border which delineates ‘Australia’. Thanks to the Solidarity comrades and Canberra refugee activists who opened my eyes to the cruelty of borders, and with whom I stand in the fight against them. Special thanks to Geraldine who first challenged me with the case for open borders. Thanks to Stucco Housing Co-operative for providing an oasis of liveability in this menacing and exorbitantly expensive city. Thanks to my friends there who fed, sup- ported, and encouraged me. Especially to Lilia whose company escorted me through so many days and nights of study and my roommates who got me through the last trying days of thesis-writing. Thanks to the Political Economy department and those who fought to have it estab- lished as a bastion of critical economics. -
Asylum Seekers and Australian Politics, 1996-2007
ASYLUM SEEKERS AND AUSTRALIAN POLITICS, 1996-2007 Bette D. Wright, BA(Hons), MA(Int St) Discipline of Politics & International Studies (POLIS) School of History and Politics The University of Adelaide, South Australia A Thesis Presented to the School of History and Politics In the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Contents DECLARATION ................................................................................................................... i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................. ii ABSTRACT ......................................................................................................................... iii INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. v CHAPTER 1: CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK .................................................................. 1 Sovereignty, the nation-state and stateless people ............................................................. 1 Nationalism and Identity .................................................................................................. 11 Citizenship, Inclusion and Exclusion ............................................................................... 17 Justice and human rights .................................................................................................. 20 CHAPTER 2: REFUGEE ISSUES & THEORETICAL REFLECTIONS ......................... 30 Who -
House of Representatives By-Elections 1902-2002
INFORMATION, ANALYSIS AND ADVICE FOR THE PARLIAMENT INFORMATION AND RESEARCH SERVICES Current Issues Brief No. 15 2002–03 House of Representatives By-elections 1901–2002 DEPARTMENT OF THE PARLIAMENTARY LIBRARY ISSN 1440-2009 Copyright Commonwealth of Australia 2003 Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means including information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior written consent of the Department of the Parliamentary Library, other than by Senators and Members of the Australian Parliament in the course of their official duties. This paper has been prepared for general distribution to Senators and Members of the Australian Parliament. While great care is taken to ensure that the paper is accurate and balanced, the paper is written using information publicly available at the time of production. The views expressed are those of the author and should not be attributed to the Information and Research Services (IRS). Advice on legislation or legal policy issues contained in this paper is provided for use in parliamentary debate and for related parliamentary purposes. This paper is not professional legal opinion. Readers are reminded that the paper is not an official parliamentary or Australian government document. IRS staff are available to discuss the paper's contents with Senators and Members and their staff but not with members of the public. Published by the Department of the Parliamentary Library, 2003 I NFORMATION AND R ESEARCH S ERVICES Current Issues Brief No. 15 2002–03 House of Representatives By-elections 1901–2002 Gerard Newman, Statistics Group Scott Bennett, Politics and Public Administration Group 3 March 2003 Acknowledgments The authors would like to acknowledge the assistance of Murray Goot, Martin Lumb, Geoff Winter, Jan Pearson, Janet Wilson and Diane Hynes in producing this paper. -
Honouring Australians in the 1970S
The definitive version is available at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajph.12317/full The Politics of National Recognition: Honouring Australians in a Post-Imperial World1 Karen Fox and Samuel Furphy Abstract The announcement in January 2015 that Prince Philip had been chosen to receive an Australian knighthood (an honour which itself had been controversially revived the previous year) sparked a fury of debate about honours, and about the continuance of a British connection in Australia’s national life. Such debates were not new, echoing earlier arguments about honours as a national or imperial symbol. Through two related case studies – the Australian honours system and the Australian of the Year award – this article explores the politics of national recognition in 1970s and 1980s Australia. We consider both the politics involved in the creation and alteration of awards by which individual achievement and service are recognised by the nation, and the politics involved in imagining and recognising an Australian nation as expressed in those awards. We argue that these two institutions were more than a means to acknowledge hard work or sacrifice; they were also significant sites for contests over the nature of Australia’s post-imperial identity. Like most modern nations, Australia uses an official system of honours to acknowledge and celebrate the services and achievements of its citizens. This formal system is complemented by the more populist Australian of the Year award. In the twenty-first century these two honorific institutions are familiar and – with some notable exceptions – widely valued and accepted elements of the social and symbolic landscape. -
House of Representatives By-Elections 1901-2005
Parliament of Australia Department of Parliamentary Services Parliamentary Library RESEARCH BRIEF Information analysis and advice for the Parliament 16 August 2005, no. 1, 2005–06, ISSN 1832-2883 House of Representatives by-elections 1901–2005 The first part of this revised brief discusses the 141 by-elections for the House of Representatives since Federation, including the most recent for the New South Wales division of Werriwa. The brief’s appendices give a full set of by-election figures. Gerard Newman, Statistics Section Scott Bennett, Politics and Public Administration Section Contents Party abbreviations ................................................... 1 Executive summary ................................................... 2 Contests ......................................................... 2 Causes .......................................................... 2 Outcomes ........................................................ 2 The organisation of Commonwealth by-elections.............................. 3 The reasons why by-elections have been held .............................. 3 The timing of by-elections ............................................ 4 By-elections 1994–05 ............................................. 5 Vacancies for which no by-election was held 1901–2005 ................... 6 Number of nominations .............................................. 6 Candidates per by-election ......................................... 7 Voter turnout ..................................................... 7 Party performance ................................................... -
Rotary International
ROTARY INTERNATIONAL THE FIRST FORTY YEARS. A HISTORY OF THE ROTARY CLUB OF BELCONNEN A.C.T. INCORPORATED. Authors: Past President John Sheldrick Past President Peter Oldham 2 Historical Note from the Authors This history of the Rotary Club of Belconnen Inc. was researched and developed in two parts and hence the ‗Forward‘ comprising input from two Presidents and the Charter President. The first part was commissioned by the then President Warren Karle in his Rotary year, 2007-2008, and comprised most of Part One – The Formative Years. The second was commissioned by President Rod Menzies in his Rotary year, 2010-2011 as a means of recognising in some small way the 40th Anniversary of the Club. We hope that this publication will give another strong indication that the impact the Rotary Club of Belconnen has had, not only on the local community, but nationally and indeed internationally. The camaraderie, fellowship and contribution of all members over the years are quite amazing. We trust you find it a good read. John Sheldrick Peter Oldham Past President Past President 3 Foreword John Sheldrick and Peter Oldham have devoted many hours in compiling this history of the Rotary Club of Belconnen. It has required much research into early records, and has resulted in a very readable and comprehensive account of the formation of one of the most successful clubs in the district. We were chartered as ‗Rotary Club of Canberra – Belconnen‘ in 1971. This was a very exciting time in the development of Belconnen. Charter members were mostly new to Canberra, in new jobs, living in new houses in new suburbs. -
Minutes of Proceedings
1241 LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY FOR THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY 2004–2005–2006–2007 MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS No. 116 WEDNESDAY, 17 OCTOBER 2007 1 The Assembly met at 10.30 a.m., pursuant to adjournment. The Speaker (Mr Berry) took the Chair and asked Members to stand in silence and pray or reflect on their responsibilities to the people of the Australian Capital Territory. 2 DEATH OF DR KEN FRY Mr Stanhope (Chief Minister) moved—That this Assembly expresses its deep regret at the death of Dr Ken Fry, inaugural President of the ACT Branch of the Australian Labor Party and first member for the seat of Fraser, an honourable and highly principled politician, and tenders its profound sympathy to his family and friends in their bereavement. Mr Stefaniak (Leader of the Opposition), Mr Berry (Speaker) and Dr Foskey addressed the Assembly in support of the motion and all Members present having stood, in silence— Question—passed. 3 DEATH OF MR JIM O’NEILL OAM Mr Stanhope (Chief Minister) moved—That this Assembly expresses its deep regret at the death of Mr Jim O’Neill OAM, first Auditor-General of the ACT, an outstanding public servant who has made an abiding impact on our community and tenders its profound sympathy to his family, friends and former colleagues in their bereavement. Mr Stefaniak (Leader of the Opposition) addressed the Assembly in support of the motion and all Members present having stood, in silence— Question—passed. www.parliament.act.gov.au/assembly/minutes.asp 1242 No. 116—17 October 2007 4 LEAVE OF ABSENCE TO MEMBER Mrs Burke moved—That leave of absence be given to Mr Smyth for today’s sitting. -
Here Are Differences Between the Progressive and the Conservative Traditions of Foreign Policy, and Those Differences Matter
"VTUSBMJBO*OTUJUVUFPG*OUFSOBUJPOBM"GGBJST 1SPNPUJOH6OEFSTUBOEJOHPG*OUFSOBUJPOBM"GGBJST Australian Journal of International Affairs 2016 Federal Election Foreign Policy Special Section Australia’s International Affairs: The Labor Approach Tanya Plibersek Mainstream thinking accepts that the main tenets of Australian foreign policy are the US alliance, engagement with the Indo-Pacific and our global interests. We differ over emphasis and approach, but we are fortunate to have broad agreement on the component parts. This is one reason why foreign policy often plays a marginal role in Australian election campaigns—elections are designed to amplify difference. Foreign policy is most often about continuity and seeking common ground. Election campaigns are built on concentrated points of contrast. Yet even if foreign policy does not shift a single vote in a single seat, Australia’s place in the world deserves to be part of the national conversation. There are differences between the progressive and the conservative traditions of foreign policy, and those differences matter. The key difference is foundational—Labor believes that good international citizenship is a critical driver to achieving a secure and prosperous Australia, while there is a tendency from the conservative parties towards isolation and insularity. We know that Australia will not be wealthier or safer if we only seek safety and wealth inside the walls of a fortress we build for ourselves. Labor understands that, as Gareth Evans observed, “good international citizenship is no more — and no less — than the pursuit of enlightened self-interest”. The principle of good international citizenship aligns with enduring Labor values of solidarity, fairness, equality, justice and inclusion.