Nevada, USA Volume 7 Number 46 AUGUST 5, 2010 the PENNY PRESS,AUGUST 5, 2010 PAGE 2

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Nevada, USA Volume 7 Number 46 AUGUST 5, 2010 the PENNY PRESS,AUGUST 5, 2010 PAGE 2 Penny Press Nevada, USA Volume 7 Number 46 AUGUST 5, 2010 THE PENNY PRESS,AUGUST 5, 2010 PAGE 2 www.pennypresslv.com The Penny Press is published weekly by Penny Credits: Ely Radio LLC All Contents © Penny Press 2010 Publisher and Editor: Contributing Editors: Letters to the Editor are encouraged. They should be Press Fred Weinberg Floyd Brown Al Thomas sent to our offices at 335 W. 4th Street Winnemucca, NV Logotype Circulation: Doug French Bill Here 891445 They can also be emailed to: pennypresslv@ Pointedlymad Charlotte Weinberg John Getter Pat Choate gmail.com No unsigned or unverifiable letters will be licensed from: printed. Rich Gast Wyatt Cox 702-740-5588 Fax: 702-920-8215 Penny Press WINNEMUCCA, NEVADA 16 PAGES VOLUME 7 NUMBER 46 AUGUST 5, 2010 Attacks On Tea Party Political BS By BILL WILSON it is occurring in a highly charged statement, the tea parties represent run ballot initiatives supported by Special To The Penny Press media climate where the NAACP “dangerous extremism that threat- left-wing activist-financier George has accused the movement of being ens to tear the country apart.” Of Soros. The attacks on the tea party racist. course, the group is actually nothing This mirrors a prior effort in movement and other citizen activists The DNC is attempting to ride more than a Democrat-labor union Nevada by Scott Ashjian to run for are continuing. This time, the DNC the wave of coverage that resulted front group that operates out of the Senate against Harry Reid under has unveiled its latest effort to por- from the NAACP’s charge to dis- offices of Joseph Sandler, a longtime the banner, “Tea Party of Nevada.” tray tea parties, and Republicans, as credit the movement once and for general counsel to the Democratic Again, the apparent intent was to all. It has all of the appearances of National Committee, as reported by siphon votes away from Republican a coordinated attack, but there is an FNC’s Joseph Abrams. candidates who might benefit from even wider context than has been But that’s not all. Michigan the popular tea party movement. Commentary widely reported by the mainstream Capitol Confidential is reporting that Then there’s the case of Jason media that shows a clear pattern to the political director of the Oakland Levin, who ran an effort to actively sabotage, infiltrate, and to other- County Democrat Party was behind infiltrate tea party rallies on April radicals and extremists. wise destroy the movement, which an effort to register candidates to 15th, and who was dedicated to This effort, www.republican- has been chronicled by conservative run under a fake “Tea Party” in “dismantling and demolishing” the teapartycontract.com, is nothing blogger Michelle Malkin. Michigan, ostensibly to take away movement and to portray them as more than a series of misrepresenta- For example, there’s the quite votes from Republican candidates “racists, morons, and homophobes.” tions of popular ideas like repealing obvious effort by http://theteapar- and to confuse voters. It turns out A similar effort was waged by an ObamaCare and the financial take- tyisover.org whose express mission that the petition drive necessary to anarchist group to “[o]rganize coun- over, eliminating whole departments is to portray tea parties as extrem- create the party on the ballot was ter-protests against the tea party and agencies in the federal govern- ists intent on inciting violence. operated by Progressive Campaigns, demonstrations, same time, same ment, keeping taxes low, etc. but According to the group’s mission Inc. out of California, which has place.” Continued on page4 The Conservative Weekly Voice Of Las Vegas FLOYD BROWN PAGE 5 Penny Wisdom FRED WEINBERG PAGE 6 Inside: DOUG FRENCH PAGE 7 The modern definition of 'rac- AL THOMAS PAGE 10 ist' is someone who is winning Reid Either An an argument with a liberal. WYATT COX PAGE 11 —Peter Brimelow MARK WALLACE PAGE 12 Idiot Or Waterboy PATRICK R. GIBBONS PAGE 14 See Editorial Page 6 PET OF THE WEEK PAGE 15 THE PENNY PRESS,AUGUST 5, 2010 PAGE 4 What's Racist About Tea? Continued from page 3 Other sabotage and intimidation efforts include the violent assault of Shirts” and compared them to domestic terrorists, “Some of the rhetoric that activist Kenneth Gladney by SEIU thugs out of a St. Louis town hall meet- we’re hearing is… eerily reminiscent of the kind of things that drove Tim ing, where activists spoke out against ObamaCare. Also, at least one pro- McVeigh to bomb the federal building in Oklahoma.” Reid union member attempted to misdirect tea partiers from a large rally See a pattern here? It has all of the appearances of a coordinated smear that was being held in Searchlight, NV. campaign against tea parties and other citizen activists, which even the lead- All of this, however, is overshadowed by what Democrat congressional ership of Congress has participated in. But where is the major media cover- leadership has said publicly about the tea parties from almost the very begin- age of this? It’s so obviously a political theater that to report the NAACP’s ning. House Majority Whip James Clyburn’s has claimed that tea parties are smear without taking into account the above facts is dishonest. It becomes a “kind of terrorism.” Others have alleged that activists shouted racial epi- complicity in the myth’s perpetuation. thets at members of Congress on March 20th at a protest against the health The fact is, if there were this many pieces showing Republican Party care bill, as reported by the American Thinker. Others have attested that acts efforts to sabotage, infiltrate, and discredit an entire political movement and of vandalism were linked to the tea parties. falsely portray it as extremist, you can bet it would be portrayed as a grand Majority Whip Clyburn’s attack followed House Speaker Nancy Pelosi conspiracy. and Majority Leader Steny Hoyer wrote an oped in USA Today calling It’s time to start putting these pieces together. Hundreds of thousands opponents “un-American”. Congressman Steve Kagen called opponents well-meaning, activist Americans are being besmirched and smeared as “uncivilized,” and Congressman Baron Hill called them “political terror- part of a contrived political strategy by Democrats to keep Congress. These ists.” Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid proudly called them “evil mon- citizens want nothing more than less government control over the lives of gers.” individual Americans, and for that, they are pariahs and must be destroyed. Congressman Brian Baird called opponents of ObamaCare “Brown Bill Wilson is the President of Americans of Limited Government. We Get Letters... Editor: Harry Reid says that Sharron Angle resides in some “alternate uni- verse”. How ironic. This is the same Harry Reid who believes there are no illegal immigrants working in Nevada. The same Harry Reid who won’t enforce Federal immigration laws against illegals. The same Harry Reid who gave a standing ovation to President Calderon of Mexico after President Calderon publicly chastised the United States over the Arizona’s immigration law – a law less stringent than Mexico’s. The same Harry Reid whose recent gargantuan financial reform bill leaves untouched the principal perps in our economic meltdown – Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac – whose lending policies caused Nevada’s record setting foreclosure rate. The same Harry Reid who believes carrying water for President Obama and Nancy Pelosi on health care is more important than listening to his Nevada constituents. Should I go on? The alternate universe, Harry, is Congress. And you have dwelt there far, far too long. Robert R. Kessler Las Vegas, NV Letters can be addressed to [email protected] or to 335 W. 4th Street, Winnemucca, NV 89445 www.pennypressnv.com THE PENNY PRESS,AUGUST 5, 2010 PAGE 5 Commentary: Floyd Brown the increase in deaths is directly the In Afghanistan, our leaders are com- tacted the White House about the Obama result of Obama’s personal misman- plicit in the death of each soldier, leaks before they were released and agement of the war. The blood of our Marine or Navy corpsman who falls asked them to review them. Mismanagement servicemen is on his hands. because politically correct rules of The White House’s response? Why? Upon taking management engagement shield our enemies.” Nada. Of Afghan of defense policy, the Obama admin- Obama dithered in adopting a They were too busy golfing, istration intervened to change the new policy in Afghanistan deep into partying with Paul McCartney and War Leads To rules of engagement. Ralph Peters 2009. This led to criticism from spending the summer vacationing. explained it this way in the New even a left-wing dove like Sen. John In subsequent e-mail conver- Needless Deaths York Post: “Unless our troops in Kerry, Democrat of Massachusetts. sations, Assange’s people clarified combat are absolutely certain that Of Obama’s indecision, Kerry that they sought an administration With the deaths of three addition- no civilians are present, they’re said in a Senate Foreign Relations response through The New York al U.S. troops on July 29, this month denied artillery or air support. If Committee hearing, “At the very Times, and even The New York is officially the bloodiest of the nine- any civilians appear where we meet moment when our troops and our Times was ignored. year conflict in Afghanistan. The the Taliban, our troops are to ‘break allies’ troops are sacrificing more This is the part of the puzzle death toll for July is up to 63 and it contact’ -- to retreat.” and more, our path and our progress which could explain why Obama captures the record as the deadliest Peters concludes, “When our seem to be growing less and less and his supporters have been trying month for Americans so far.
Recommended publications
  • The Revival of the Nevada Democratic Party
    CASE STUDY The Revival of the Nevada Democratic Party When a state political party’s electoral performance falters, how should political actors change its fortunes for the better— concentrate on the needs of individual candidates, bolster allied outside groups, or invest in the formal party itself? Sam Rosenfeld Daniel Schlozman August 2021 SNF Agora Case Studies The SNF Agora Institute at Johns Hopkins University offers a series of case studies that show how civic and political actors navigated real-life challenges related to democracy. Practitioners, teachers, organizational leaders, and trainers working with civic and political leaders, students, and trainees can use our case studies to deepen their skills, to develop insights about how to approach strategic choices and dilemmas, and to get to know each other better and work more effectively. How to Use the Case Unlike many case studies, ours do not focus on individual leaders or other decision-makers. Instead, the SNF Agora case studies are about choices that groups make collectively. Therefore, these cases work well as prompts for group discussions. The basic question in each case is: “What would we do?” After reading a case, some groups role-play the people who were actually involved in the situation, treating the discussion as a simulation. In other groups, the participants speak as themselves, discussing the strategies that they would advocate for the group described in the case. The person who assigns or organizes your discussion may want you to use the case in one of those ways. When studying and discussing the choices made by real-life decision-makers (often under intense pressure), it is appropriate to exhibit some humility.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORY of WASHOE COUNTY Introduction
    HISTORY OF WASHOE COUNTY Introduction Lying in the northwest portion of the State of Nevada, named for a tribe of American Indians and containing a land area in excess of 6,000 square miles, Washoe County today consists of two of the nine original counties -- Washoe and Lake (later renamed Roop) Counties -- into which the Territory of Nevada was divided by the first territorial legislature in 1861. The country, "a land of contrasts, extremes, and apparent contradictions, of mingled barrenness and fertility, beauty and desolation, aridity and storm,"1 was claimed by the Spanish Empire until 1822 when it became a part of Mexican territory resulting from Mexico's successful war of independence from Spain. Mexico ceded the area to the United States in 1848 following the Mexican War, and the ceded lands remained part of the "unorganized territory" of the United States until 1850. Spanish and Mexican constructive possession probably had little effect on the life styles of the Northern Paiutes and the Washos -- the two American Indian tribes which inhabited the area. The Northern Paiutes ranged over most of Washoe County2 save the series of valleys lying along the eastern foothills of the Sierra Nevada. These valleys were the domain of the Washos, a small, nomadic tribe whose members spoke an alien tongue and from which the name of the county is derived3. The 1840's During the 1840's Washoe County was traversed by a number of trappers and explorers, as well as several well-defined emigrant trails leading to California and Oregon. In 1843 mountain man "Old Bill" Williams4 led his trappers from the Klamath Lake region of California to Pyramid Lake and the Truckee River.
    [Show full text]
  • MINUTES of the SENATE COMMITTEE on LEGISLATIVE OPERATIONS and ELECTIONS Seventy-Sixth Session May 5, 2011 the Senate Committee
    MINUTES OF THE SENATE COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATIVE OPERATIONS AND ELECTIONS Seventy-sixth Session May 5, 2011 The Senate Committee on Legislative Operations and Elections was called to order by Chair David R. Parks at 3:30 p.m. on Thursday, May 5, 2011, in Room 2144 of the Legislative Building, Carson City, Nevada. The meeting was videoconferenced to the Grant Sawyer State Office Building, Room 5100, 555 East Washington Avenue, Las Vegas, Nevada. Exhibit A is the Agenda. Exhibit B is the Attendance Roster. All exhibits are available and on file in the Research Library of the Legislative Counsel Bureau. COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT: Senator David R. Parks, Chair Senator Moises (Mo) Denis, Vice Chair Senator Steven A. Horsford Senator Barbara K. Cegavske Senator James A. Settelmeyer GUEST LEGISLATORS PRESENT: Assemblyman Tick Segerblom, Assembly District No. 9 STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT: Carol Stonefield, Policy Analyst Eileen O'Grady, Counsel Michelle Ené, Committee Secretary OTHERS PRESENT: Ross Miller, Secretary of State Scott F. Gilles, Deputy for Elections, Office of the Secretary of State Rebecca Gasca, Legislative and Policy Director, American Civil Liberties Union of Nevada Ray Bacon, President, Nevada Manufacturers Association Lynn Chapman, Nevada Families Janine Hansen, Independent American Party; Nevada Eagle Forum Senate Committee on Legislative Operations and Elections May 5, 2011 Page 2 Jan Gilbert, Northern Nevada Coordinator, Progressive Leadership Alliance of Nevada John Wagner, State Chairman, Independent American Party Alan Glover, Former Senator; Clerk/Recorder, Carson City CHAIR PARKS: I will open the meeting with a bill draft request (BDR) to revise the legislative districts from which members of the State Senate and Assembly, as well as the representatives to the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Tea Party Activity on the 2010 United States Senate Elections
    The Effect of Tea Party Activity on the 2010 United States Senate Elections Patricia Ceccarelli A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of BACHELOR OF ARTS WITH HONORS DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN March 25, 2011 Advised by Dr. Michael T. Heaney ABSTRACT The tea party movement began in early 2009 in reaction to the stimulus bill. Throughout 2009 local and national tea party groups formed and held rallies around the country. A Republican won Ted Kennedy’s Massachusetts U.S. Senate seat with the help of the tea party movement in early 2010. Several GOP establishment candidates lost their primaries to tea party candidates. So, what was the overall effect of tea party activity on the 2010 U.S. Senate elections? Did voter enthusiasm lead to more wins by Republican candidates? Or did the movement push the candidates too far to the right and prevent Republicans from winning? Each of the 37 U.S. Senate races were coded in terms of level of tea party activity, expected lean of the race, and percentage of the vote won by the GOP candidate. The level of tea party activity was based off of tea party movement related endorsements and campaign contributions received by each candidate. A regression analysis produced statistically significant results suggesting that states with high levels of tea party activity earned significantly lower vote shares for Republican candidates, after controlling for races leaning toward the Republican candidate. In order to further explain these results, nine case studies of different races explored the organizing at the grassroots level of the tea party movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Tea Time: a Comparative Analysis of the Tea Party Caucus and House Republican Conference in the One Hundred Twelfth Congress
    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2014 Tea Time: A Comparative Analysis of the Tea Party Caucus and House Republican Conference in the One Hundred Twelfth Congress Stephen Phillips University of Central Florida Part of the American Politics Commons, and the Comparative Politics Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Masters Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Phillips, Stephen, "Tea Time: A Comparative Analysis of the Tea Party Caucus and House Republican Conference in the One Hundred Twelfth Congress" (2014). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 4699. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/4699 TEA TIME: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE TEA PARTY CAUCUS AND HOUSE REPUBLICAN CONFERENCE IN THE ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS by STEPHEN C. PHILLIPS B.A. University of Central Florida, 2012 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Political Science in the College of Sciences at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Spring Term 2014 © 2014 Stephen C. Phillips ii ABSTRACT Following the historic election of Barack Obama, the largest overhaul of the nation’s health care system since the Great Society, and with the country still reeling from the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression, a group of disenchanted conservative Republicans and elected leaders wary of government policy gave rise to a new political movement – the Tea Party.
    [Show full text]
  • Statistics Congressional Election
    STATISTICS OF THE CONGRESSIONAL ELECTION OF NOVEMBER 2, 2010 SHOWING THE VOTE CAST FOR EACH NOMINEE FOR UNITED STATES SENATOR, REPRESENTATIVE, AND DELEGATE TO THE ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS, TOGETHER WITH A RECAPITULATION THEREOF COMPILED FROM OFFICIAL SOURCES BY KAREN L. HAAS CLERK OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES http://clerk.house.gov (Corrected to June 3, 2011) WASHINGTON : 2011 STATISTICS OF THE CONGRESSIONAL ELECTION OF NOVEMBER 2, 2010 (Number which precedes name of candidate designates Congressional District.) ALABAMA FOR UNITED STATES SENATOR Richard C. Shelby, Republican ................................................................. 968,181 William G. Barnes, Democrat ................................................................... 515,619 Write-in ....................................................................................................... 1,699 FOR UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE 1. Jo Bonner, Republican .............................................................................. 129,063 David Walter, Constitution Party of Alabama ........................................ 26,357 Write-in ....................................................................................................... 861 2. Martha Roby, Republican .......................................................................... 111,645 Bobby Bright, Democrat ............................................................................ 106,865 Write-in ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Political History of Nevada: Introduction
    POLITICAL HISTORY OF NEVADA (TWELFTH EDITION) Issued by BARBARA K. CEGAVSKE Nevada Secretary of State Produced jointly with the Research Division of the Legislative Counsel Bureau iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction .............................................................................................................. 1 Acknowledgments .................................................................................................2 Dedications .............................................................................................................4 Present Constitutional Offi cers and Duties ..................................................... 17 Secretaries of State, 1861–Current ................................................................... 28 2015 Legislative Leadership ............................................................................... 31 2016 Supreme Court and Appellate Court .......................................................33 Chapter 1: Politics in Nevada, Circa 2016 Nevada: A Brief Historiography .......................................................................37 Cheers! Nevada Statehood Celebrations Th rough the Years ........................ 40 Th e “First Friend”: Th e Political Bond of Ronald Reagan and Paul Laxalt ........................................................................................................45 Nevada Senators Historically Wield National Political Power ......................49 Nevada and the Federal Estate ...........................................................................52
    [Show full text]
  • A West European Style Populist Radical Right Movement in America? the Case of the Tea Party
    A West European Style Populist Radical Right Movement in America? The Case of the Tea Party Daniel May: McNair Scholar Dr. Ross Burkhart: Mentor Political Science & Communication Abstract The Tea Party (TP), whose candidates made significant gains in the 2010-midterm elections, lacks a place in the comparative party literature and also defies ready classification. Is it solely a movement to reduce the size of government and cut taxes as its name – some refer to it as the Taxed Enough Already party – implies? Or do its supporters share a broader set of conservative positions on social as well as economic issues? Does the movement draw support from across the religious spectrum? Or has the religious right “taken over” the TP, as some commentators have suggested (Koelkebeck, 2010)? In light of these various claims, this comparative study seeks to characterize the TP and asks: (1) Is it a populist party? (2) Is it a populist radical right party? The aim is to locate the TP in multi-dimensional space using a careful reading of the party literature as the primary data source and to do so by reference to three fundamental “isms” attributed to West European populist radical right parties – that is, populism, socio-cultural authoritarianism and ethno-nationalism (nativism). It is argued that the TP is indeed a populist radical right party – with Americanism as its pivotal concept – albeit one (thus far) lacking the xenophobic extremism of the likes of the Freedom Party of Austria (FPA) or the Danish People's Party (DPP). Tea Party Influence The growth in TP support has steadily increased, from its peculiar beginning on February 19, 2009, (the infamous 8:15 AM rant by CNBC on-air editor Rick Santelli on the floor of the Chicago mercantile exchange) right on to the dramatic achievements made in the 2010 mid-term elections that helped the GOP take control of the House of Representatives and make gains in the Senate.
    [Show full text]
  • Tea Party Nationalism: a Critical Examination of the Tea Party Movement and the Size, Scope, and Focus of Its National Factions
    Tea Party Nationalism: A Critical Examination of the Tea Party Movement and the Size, Scope, and Focus of Its National Factions By Devin Burghart and Leonard Zeskind Institute for Research & Education on Human Rights. The Institute for Research & Education on Human Rights is responsible for the content and analysis of this report. Additional materials, including updates and exclusive web content can be found at teapartynationalism.com. Copyright © 2010 Institute for Research & Education on Human Rights. All Rights Reserved. No Part of this report may be reproduced without the permission of the Institute for Research & Education on Human Rights except for sections quoted with proper attribution for purposes of reviews and public education. The Institute for Research & Education on Human Rights (IREHR) is a national organization with an international outlook examining racist, anti-Semitic, white nationalist, and far-right social movements, analyzing their intersection with civil society and social policy, educating the public, and assisting in the protection and extension of human rights through organization and informed mobilization. Institute for Research & Education on Human Rights P.O. Box 411552 Kansas City, MO 64141 voice: (816) 474-4748 email: [email protected] website: www.irehr.org Contents Foreword .................................................................................................................................5 Introduction ............................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Nevada Voters
    Suffolk University EMBARGOED UNTIL 1PM WEDNESDAY, 10/13 Likely Nevada Voters Nevada AREA N= 500 100% Clark .......................................... 1 ( 1/ 74) 305 61% Washoe ......................................... 2 90 18% Central ........................................ 3 105 21% START Hello, my name is __________ and I am conducting a survey for Suffolk University and I would like to get your opinions on some political questions. Would you be willing to spend five minutes answering some questions? N= 500 100% Continue ....................................... 1 ( 1/ 76) 500 100% GENDER Gender N= 500 100% Male ........................................... 1 ( 1/ 77) 239 48% Female ......................................... 2 261 52% S2. Are you enrolled as a Democrat, Republican, Independent American or Independent Non-partisan/Other? N= 500 100% Democrat ....................................... 1 ( 1/ 81) 212 42% Republican ..................................... 2 184 37% Independent American............................ 3 22 4% Non-partisan/Other ............................. 4 82 16% Und/Ref/Not reg ................................ 5 0 0% S3. How likely are you to vote in the upcoming election for Governor and U.S. Senate - would you say you are almost certain to vote, will you probably vote, are the chances 50-50, or that it is not likely you will vote in the general? N= 500 100% Almost certain ................................. 1 ( 1/ 84) 481 96% Probably vote .................................. 2 19 4% 50-50 .......................................... 3 0 0% Probably not ................................... 4 0 0% Definitely not ................................. 5 0 0% Don't know/Refused ............................. 6 0 0% S4. What is your age category? N= 500 100% 18-24 YRS ...................................... 1 ( 1/ 87) 12 2% 25-34 YRS ...................................... 2 19 4% 35-44 YRS ...................................... 3 59 12% 45-54 YRS ...................................... 4 75 15% 55-64 YRS .....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Elko County, Nevada Sample Ballot
    6 G e l y t S t o l l EELLKKOO VOTE a B CCOOUUNNTTYY,, NNEEVVAADDAA SAMPLE BALLOT and Voter Information Pamphlet GENERAL ELECTION Tuesday, November 2, 2010 NOT Y ICE our p pla olling ce ma bee y hav POLLS OPEN ON ELECTION DAY n cha e See nged back ! 7 A.M. AND CLOSE AT 7 P.M. for po cover lling loc place ation. THE LOCATION OF YOUR POLLING PLACE IS SHOWN ON THE LABEL ON THE BACK COVER. SAVE THIS SAMPLE BALLOT TO HELP YOU LOCATE YOUR POLLING PLACE ON ELECTION DAY! Compiled and Distributed by WIN SMITH, ELKO COUNTY CLERK 2010 GENERAL ELECTION Tuesday, November 2, 2010 Vote at your polling place on Election Day. 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. IMPORTANT: Your Polling Place may have changed since the last election. See your Polling Location on the back of this booklet. OR Vote Early At the Elko Convention Center 700 Moren Way October 16–29, 2010 EARLY VOTING SCHEDULE: Saturday, October 16 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. Monday–Friday, October 18–October 22 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. Saturday, October 23 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. Monday–Thursday, October 25–October 28 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. Nevada Day, Friday, October 29, 2010 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. Early voting schedule for West Wendover, Wells, and Carlin on page 21. For your voting convenience, REVIEW and MARK your sample ballot. Bring it to the Polls when you vote. If you would like an Absent Ballot, submit your request in writing to the Clerk’s Office no later than Tuesday, October 26.
    [Show full text]
  • Election Results for the US Senate and the US House Of
    Election Results for the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House of Representatives Election Results for the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate the U.S. for Election Results Federal Elections FEDERAL ELECTIONS 2010 Election Results for the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House of Representatives Federal Election Commission Washington, D.C. July 2011 Commissioners Cynthia L. Bauerly, Chair Caroline C. Hunter, Vice Chair Donald F. McGahn II Matthew S. Petersen Steven T. Walther Ellen L. Weintraub Statutory Officers Alec Palmer, Staff Director Christopher Hughey, Acting General Counsel Lynne A. McFarland, Inspector General Compiled by: Federal Election Commission Public Disclosure Division Office of Communications 999 E Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20463 800/424-9530 202/694-1120 Editors: Eileen J. Leamon, Deputy Assistant Staff Director for Disclosure Jason Bucelato, Senior Public Affairs Specialist Map Design: James Landon Jones, FEC Printing Officer TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Preface 1 Explanatory Notes 2 I. 2010 Election Results: Tables and Maps A. Summary Tables • Table: 2010 General Election Votes Cast for U.S. Senate and House 5 • Table: 2010 General Election Votes Cast by Party 6 • Table: 2010 Primary and General Election Votes Cast for U.S. Congress 7 • Table: 2010 Votes Cast for the U.S. Senate by Party 8 • Table: 2010 Votes Cast for the U.S. House of Representatives by Party 9 • Table: 2010 Party Gains in the U.S. House of Representatives 10 B. Maps United States Congress • Map: 2010 U.S. Senate Campaigns 11 • Map: 2010 U.S.
    [Show full text]