DOCSLIB.ORG

Role of Slitrk Family Members in Neurodevelopment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Role of Slitrk Family Members in Neurodevelopment Role of Slitrk Family Members in Neurodevelopment François Beaubien Integrated Program in Neuroscience Montreal Neurological Institute McGill University Montreal, Quebec, Canada April 2012 A thesis dissertation submitted to the Department of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies of McGill University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Neurological Sciences © François Beaubien, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract .........................................................................................................................................5 Résumé..........................................................................................................................................6 List of figures ...............................................................................................................................7 List of abbreviations ...................................................................................................................9 Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................. 12 Author contributions ............................................................................................................... 14 Chapter 1: Literature Review 1. General introduction ......................................................................................................... 15 2. Synaptogenesis 2.1. Historical perspective ................................................................................................ 16 2.2. Example of the neuromuscular junction ................................................................ 18 2.2.1. Comparison between nerve terminals of neuromuscular junctions and central synapses ................................................................................................. 21 2.3. CNS synaptogenesis 2.3.1. Introduction ....................................................................................................... 22 2.3.2. The four steps of synaptogenesis .................................................................... 24 2.3.3. Synaptogenic proteins ....................................................................................... 25 2.3.3.1. Secreted factors 2.3.3.1.1. Neuronally derived priming factors ........................................... 27 2.3.3.1.1.1. Wnt ....................................................................................... 27 2.3.3.1.1.2. FGF ...................................................................................... 28 2.3.3.1.2. Glial-derived priming factors ...................................................... 29 2.3.3.1.3. Neuronal pentraxin family ........................................................... 30 2.3.3.2. Synaptic adhesion complexes 2.3.3.2.1. Cadherins ....................................................................................... 32 2.3.3.2.2. Nectins ........................................................................................... 33 2.3.3.2.3. NCAM ............................................................................................ 34 2.3.3.2.4. Neurexins and Neuroligins .......................................................... 35 2.3.3.2.5. Tripartite complexe neurexin/Cbln1/GluRδ2 ......................... 39 2.3.3.2.6. Neurexins and Dystroglycans ..................................................... 40 2.3.3.2.7. Neurexins and Neurexophilins ................................................... 40 2.3.3.2.8. Neurexins and LRRTMs .............................................................. 41 2.3.3.2.9. SALMs ............................................................................................ 42 2.3.3.2.10. SynCAMs..................................................................................... 43 2.3.3.2.11. NGLs ........................................................................................... 44 2.3.3.2.12. Ephrins and Eph Receptors ..................................................... 46 2.3.3.2.13. FLRTs .......................................................................................... 47 2.3.3.2.14. IL1RAPL1 and IL-1RAcP ........................................................ 48 2.3.4. Role of Leucine-Rich Repeat proteins in synaptogenesis ............................ 48 2 3. The Slitrk family 3.1. Identification............................................................................................................... 49 3.2. Genomic organization of the mouse and human Slitrks ...................................... 50 3.3. Phylogeny analysis for Slitrk1 ................................................................................... 50 3.4. Slitrks protein structure ............................................................................................. 52 3.5. Expression of Slitrks in the nervous system .......................................................... 54 3.6. Relationship to Slits and Trks proteins ................................................................... 55 3.7. Functions of the Slitrks 3.7.1. Slitrks and neuropsychiatric disorders 3.7.1.1. Tourette’s syndrome ............................................................................... 56 3.7.1.2. Other potential implications in neuropsychiatric disorders .............. 58 3.7.2. Slitrks and their CNS functions 3.7.2.1. Early experiments with cell lines and primary neurons ..................... 60 3.7.2.2. Interaction between Slitrk1 and the 14-3-3 proteins ......................... 60 3.7.2.3. Characterization of Slitrks knockout mice .......................................... 61 4. Rationale and objectives ................................................................................................... 63 Chapter 2: Differential Expression of Slitrk Family Members in the Mouse Nervous System 1. Preface ................................................................................................................................. 64 2. Abstract ............................................................................................................................... 65 3. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 65 4. Experimental Procedures ................................................................................................. 67 5. Results 5.1. Specificity of the cRNA probes used in this study ................................................ 68 5.2. Slitrks expression in the olfactory system ............................................................... 72 5.3. Slitrks expression in the developing cerebral cortex ............................................. 74 5.4. Slitrks expression in the hippocampal region ........................................................ 76 5.5. Expression of Slitrk6 in the diencephalon ............................................................. 78 5.6. Slitrks expression in the cerebellum ........................................................................ 79 5.7. Slitrks expression in the embryonic spinal cord .................................................... 83 5.8. Slitrks expression in the trigeminal ganglion .......................................................... 85 5.9. Slitrks expression during eye development ............................................................ 87 6. Discussion ........................................................................................................................... 89 Chapter 3: Slitrk1 and Slitrk2 Promote Excitatory Synapse Development 1. Preface ................................................................................................................................. 91 2. Abstract ............................................................................................................................... 92 3. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 92 3 4. Experimental Procedures ................................................................................................. 94 5. Results 5.1. Slitrk1 and Slitrk2 are enriched in synaptosomal and postsynaptic density fractions ....................................................................................................................... 97 5.2. Slitrk1 and Slitrk2 induce presynaptic differentiation in a mixed-culture assay100 5.3. Overexpression of Slitrk1 and Slitrk2 in neurons induces excitatory presynaptic differentiation ........................................................................................................... 105 5.4. Slitrk1 and Slitrk2 do not induce postsynaptic differentiation in a mixed-culture assay ........................................................................................................................... 108 5.5. Application of Slitrk1 antibodies reduces synapse number in hippocampal neuron cultures ......................................................................................................... 110 6. Discussion ......................................................................................................................... 114 Chapter 4: General Discussion 1. Original contributions .................................................................................................... 117 2. Slitrks as synaptogenic proteins ...................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Old Data and Friends Improve with Age: Advancements with the Updated Tools of Genenetwork
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.24.445383; this version posted May 25, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. Old data and friends improve with age: Advancements with the updated tools of GeneNetwork Alisha Chunduri1, David G. Ashbrook2 1Department of Biotechnology, Chaitanya Bharathi Institute of Technology, Hyderabad 500075, India 2Department of Genetics, Genomics and Informatics, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN 38163, USA Abstract Understanding gene-by-environment interactions is important across biology, particularly behaviour. Families of isogenic strains are excellently placed, as the same genome can be tested in multiple environments. The BXD’s recent expansion to 140 strains makes them the largest family of murine isogenic genomes, and therefore give great power to detect QTL. Indefinite reproducible genometypes can be leveraged; old data can be reanalysed with emerging tools to produce novel biological insights. To highlight the importance of reanalyses, we obtained drug- and behavioural-phenotypes from Philip et al. 2010, and reanalysed their data with new genotypes from sequencing, and new models (GEMMA and R/qtl2). We discover QTL on chromosomes 3, 5, 9, 11, and 14, not found in the original study. We narrowed down the candidate genes based on their ability to alter gene expression and/or protein function, using cis-eQTL analysis, and variants predicted to be deleterious. Co-expression analysis (‘gene friends’) and human PheWAS were used to further narrow candidates.
    [Show full text]
  • An Integrative Prognostic and Immune Analysis of PTPRD in Pan-Cancer
    An Integrative Prognostic and Immune Analysis of PTPRD in Pan-Cancer Chunpei Ou longhua district central hospital Qin Peng longhua district central hospital Changchun Zeng ( [email protected] ) longhua district central hospital, guangdong medical university https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9489- 0627 Research Article Keywords: PTPRD, pan-cancer, prognosis, tumor-inltrating, immunotherapy Posted Date: June 4th, 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-569409/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Page 1/22 Abstract Background: PTPRD plays an indispensable role in the occurrence of multiple tumors. However, pan- cancer analysis is unavailable. The purpose of this research was to investigate the relationship between PTPRD and immunity and describe its prognostic landscape across various tumors. Methods: We explored expression prole, survival analysis, and genomic alterations of PTPRD based on the TIMER, GEPIA, UALCAN, PrognoScan, and cBioPortal database. The frequency of PTPRD mutation and its correlation with response to immunotherapy were evaluated using the cBioPortal database. The relationship between PTPRD and immune-cell inltration was analyzed by the TIMER and TISIDB databases. A protein interaction network was constructed by the STRING database. GO and KEGG enrichment analysis was executed by the Metascape database. Results: A signicant correlation between PTPRD expression and prognosis was found in various cancers. Aberrant PRPRD expression was closely related to immune inltration. Importantly, the patients who harbored PTPRD mutation and received immune checkpoint inhibitors had worse overall survival, especially in non-small cell lung cancer and melanoma, and had a higher TMB score.
    [Show full text]
  • Ageing-Associated Changes in DNA Methylation in X and Y Chromosomes
    Kananen and Marttila Epigenetics & Chromatin (2021) 14:33 Epigenetics & Chromatin https://doi.org/10.1186/s13072-021-00407-6 RESEARCH Open Access Ageing-associated changes in DNA methylation in X and Y chromosomes Laura Kananen1,2,3,4* and Saara Marttila4,5* Abstract Background: Ageing displays clear sexual dimorphism, evident in both morbidity and mortality. Ageing is also asso- ciated with changes in DNA methylation, but very little focus has been on the sex chromosomes, potential biological contributors to the observed sexual dimorphism. Here, we sought to identify DNA methylation changes associated with ageing in the Y and X chromosomes, by utilizing datasets available in data repositories, comprising in total of 1240 males and 1191 females, aged 14–92 years. Results: In total, we identifed 46 age-associated CpG sites in the male Y, 1327 age-associated CpG sites in the male X, and 325 age-associated CpG sites in the female X. The X chromosomal age-associated CpGs showed signifcant overlap between females and males, with 122 CpGs identifed as age-associated in both sexes. Age-associated X chro- mosomal CpGs in both sexes were enriched in CpG islands and depleted from gene bodies and showed no strong trend towards hypermethylation nor hypomethylation. In contrast, the Y chromosomal age-associated CpGs were enriched in gene bodies, and showed a clear trend towards hypermethylation with age. Conclusions: Signifcant overlap in X chromosomal age-associated CpGs identifed in males and females and their shared features suggest that despite the uneven chromosomal dosage, diferences in ageing-associated DNA methylation changes in the X chromosome are unlikely to be a major contributor of sex dimorphism in ageing.
    [Show full text]
  • Slitrks Control Excitatory and Inhibitory Synapse Formation with LAR
    Slitrks control excitatory and inhibitory synapse SEE COMMENTARY formation with LAR receptor protein tyrosine phosphatases Yeong Shin Yima,1, Younghee Kwonb,1, Jungyong Namc, Hong In Yoona, Kangduk Leeb, Dong Goo Kima, Eunjoon Kimc, Chul Hoon Kima,2, and Jaewon Kob,2 aDepartment of Pharmacology, Brain Research Institute, Brain Korea 21 Project for Medical Science, Severance Biomedical Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 120-752, Korea; bDepartment of Biochemistry, College of Life Science and Biotechnology, Yonsei University, Seoul 120-749, Korea; and cCenter for Synaptic Brain Dysfunctions, Institute for Basic Science, Department of Biological Sciences, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon 305-701, Korea Edited by Thomas C. Südhof, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, and approved December 26, 2012 (received for review June 11, 2012) The balance between excitatory and inhibitory synaptic inputs, share a similar domain organization comprising three Ig domains which is governed by multiple synapse organizers, controls neural and four to eight fibronectin type III repeats. LAR-RPTP family circuit functions and behaviors. Slit- and Trk-like proteins (Slitrks) are members are evolutionarily conserved and are functionally required a family of synapse organizers, whose emerging synaptic roles are for axon guidance and synapse formation (15). Recent studies have incompletely understood. Here, we report that Slitrks are enriched shown that netrin-G ligand-3 (NGL-3), neurotrophin receptor ty- in postsynaptic densities in rat brains. Overexpression of Slitrks rosine kinase C (TrkC), and IL-1 receptor accessory protein-like 1 promoted synapse formation, whereas RNAi-mediated knock- (IL1RAPL1) bind to all three LAR-RPTP family members or dis- down of Slitrks decreased synapse density.
    [Show full text]
  • Slitrk1 Is Localized to Excitatory Synapses and Promotes Their Development Received: 30 July 2015 François Beaubien1,2,*, Reesha Raja1,2,*, Timothy E
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Slitrk1 is localized to excitatory synapses and promotes their development Received: 30 July 2015 François Beaubien1,2,*, Reesha Raja1,2,*, Timothy E. Kennedy1,3, Alyson E. Fournier1,3 & Accepted: 09 May 2016 Jean-François Cloutier1,3 Published: 07 June 2016 Following the migration of the axonal growth cone to its target area, the initial axo-dendritic contact needs to be transformed into a functional synapse. This multi-step process relies on overlapping but distinct combinations of molecules that confer synaptic identity. Slitrk molecules are transmembrane proteins that are highly expressed in the central nervous system. We found that two members of the Slitrk family, Slitrk1 and Slitrk2, can regulate synapse formation between hippocampal neurons. Slitrk1 is enriched in postsynaptic fractions and is localized to excitatory synapses. Overexpression of Slitrk1 and Slitrk2 in hippocampal neurons increased the number of synaptic contacts on these neurons. Furthermore, decreased expression of Slitrk1 in hippocampal neurons led to a reduction in the number of excitatory, but not inhibitory, synapses formed in hippocampal neuron cultures. In addition, we demonstrate that different leucine rich repeat domains of the extracellular region of Slitrk1 are necessary to mediate interactions with Slitrk binding partners of the LAR receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase family, and to promote dimerization of Slitrk1. Altogether, our results demonstrate that Slitrk family proteins regulate synapse formation. One of the key steps in the development of the nervous system is the formation of new connections between different neurons. This process, referred to as synaptogenesis, also plays a critical role in the mature brain where the dynamic modification of circuitry has a profound effect on functions such as learning and memory.
    [Show full text]
  • Novel Candidate Genes of Thyroid Tumourigenesis Identified in Trk-T1 Transgenic Mice
    Endocrine-Related Cancer (2012) 19 409–421 Novel candidate genes of thyroid tumourigenesis identified in Trk-T1 transgenic mice Katrin-Janine Heiliger*, Julia Hess*, Donata Vitagliano1, Paolo Salerno1, Herbert Braselmann, Giuliana Salvatore 2, Clara Ugolini 3, Isolde Summerer 4, Tatjana Bogdanova5, Kristian Unger 6, Gerry Thomas6, Massimo Santoro1 and Horst Zitzelsberger Research Unit of Radiation Cytogenetics, Helmholtz Zentrum Mu¨nchen, Ingolsta¨dter Landstr. 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany 1Istituto di Endocrinologia ed Oncologia Sperimentale del CNR, c/o Dipartimento di Biologia e Patologia Cellulare e Molecolare, Universita` Federico II, Naples 80131, Italy 2Dipartimento di Studi delle Istituzioni e dei Sistemi Territoriali, Universita` ‘Parthenope’, Naples 80133, Italy 3Division of Pathology, Department of Surgery, University of Pisa, 56100 Pisa, Italy 4Institute of Radiation Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum Mu¨nchen, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany 5Institute of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Academy of Medical Sciences of the Ukraine, 254114 Kiev, Ukraine 6Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London W12 0HS, UK (Correspondence should be addressed to H Zitzelsberger; Email: [email protected]) *(K-J Heiliger and J Hess contributed equally to this work) Abstract For an identification of novel candidate genes in thyroid tumourigenesis, we have investigated gene copy number changes in a Trk-T1 transgenic mouse model of thyroid neoplasia. For this aim, 30 thyroid tumours from Trk-T1 transgenics were investigated by comparative genomic hybridisation. Recurrent gene copy number alterations were identified and genes located in the altered chromosomal regions were analysed by Gene Ontology term enrichment analysis in order to reveal gene functions potentially associated with thyroid tumourigenesis. In thyroid neoplasms from Trk-T1 mice, a recurrent gain on chromosomal bands 1C4–E2.3 (10.0% of cases), and losses on 3H1–H3 (13.3%), 4D2.3–E2 (43.3%) and 14E4–E5 (6.7%) were identified.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating Seven Recently Identified Genes in 100 Iranian Families with Autosomal Recessive Non-Syndromic Hearing Loss
    Iranian Rehabilitation Journal, Vol. 13, Issue 3, Autumn 2015 Original Article Investigating Seven Recently Identified Genes in 100 Iranian Families with Autosomal Recessive Non-syndromic Hearing Loss Reihaneh Hadji Alikhani; Fatemeh Ostaresh; Mojgan Babanejad Nilofar Bazazzadegan; Hossein Najmabadi*; Kimia Kahrizi Genetic Research Center University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran Objectives: Hearing loss (HL) is the most common sensory disorder, and affects 1 in 1000 newborns. About 50% of HL is due to genetics and 70% of them are non-syndromic with a recessive pattern of inheritance. Up to now, more than 50 genes have been detected which are responsible for autosomal recessive non-syndromic hearing loss, (ARNSHL). In Iran, HL is one of the most common disabilities due to consanguineous marriages. The aim was to investigate the prevalence of three new ARHL genes (GJB4, GJC3, and SLITRK6) reported in neighboring countries among Iranian families with ARNSHL. Methods: One hundred unrelated families with at least two affected siblings in consanguineous marriage, who were negative for GJB2 gene mutations, were selected. By using three STR markers for each gene, homozygosity mapping was performed. Results: Two families showed linkage to GJB4, six families were linked to GJC3 and only one family linked to SLITRK6. The samples of these families who showed linkage were sent for Sanger sequencing to detect the causative mutations. However, after analyzing the sequencing results, no mutation could be detected in either of the families. Molecular analysis for these nine families is underway in order to determine the pathogenic mutations using whole exome sequencing. Discussion: These data demonstrate a very low prevalence of mutation in these three genes (GJB4, GJC3, and SLITRK6) in the Iranian population, since no mutation was detected in our study group of 100 families.
    [Show full text]
  • Viewed and Published Immediately Upon Acceptance Cited in Pubmed and Archived on Pubmed Central Yours — You Keep the Copyright
    BMC Genomics BioMed Central Research article Open Access Differential gene expression in ADAM10 and mutant ADAM10 transgenic mice Claudia Prinzen1, Dietrich Trümbach2, Wolfgang Wurst2, Kristina Endres1, Rolf Postina1 and Falk Fahrenholz*1 Address: 1Johannes Gutenberg-University, Institute of Biochemistry, Mainz, Johann-Joachim-Becherweg 30, 55128 Mainz, Germany and 2Helmholtz Zentrum München – German Research Center for Environmental Health, Institute for Developmental Genetics, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany Email: Claudia Prinzen - [email protected]; Dietrich Trümbach - [email protected]; Wolfgang Wurst - [email protected]; Kristina Endres - [email protected]; Rolf Postina - [email protected]; Falk Fahrenholz* - [email protected] * Corresponding author Published: 5 February 2009 Received: 19 June 2008 Accepted: 5 February 2009 BMC Genomics 2009, 10:66 doi:10.1186/1471-2164-10-66 This article is available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/10/66 © 2009 Prinzen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background: In a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer disease (AD), cleavage of the amyloid precursor protein (APP) by the α-secretase ADAM10 prevented amyloid plaque formation, and alleviated cognitive deficits. Furthermore, ADAM10 overexpression increased the cortical synaptogenesis. These results suggest that upregulation of ADAM10 in the brain has beneficial effects on AD pathology. Results: To assess the influence of ADAM10 on the gene expression profile in the brain, we performed a microarray analysis using RNA isolated from brains of five months old mice overexpressing either the α-secretase ADAM10, or a dominant-negative mutant (dn) of this enzyme.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Novel Genes in Human Airway Epithelial Cells Associated with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Usin
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Identifcation of Novel Genes in Human Airway Epithelial Cells associated with Chronic Obstructive Received: 6 July 2018 Accepted: 7 October 2018 Pulmonary Disease (COPD) using Published: xx xx xxxx Machine-Based Learning Algorithms Shayan Mostafaei1, Anoshirvan Kazemnejad1, Sadegh Azimzadeh Jamalkandi2, Soroush Amirhashchi 3, Seamas C. Donnelly4,5, Michelle E. Armstrong4 & Mohammad Doroudian4 The aim of this project was to identify candidate novel therapeutic targets to facilitate the treatment of COPD using machine-based learning (ML) algorithms and penalized regression models. In this study, 59 healthy smokers, 53 healthy non-smokers and 21 COPD smokers (9 GOLD stage I and 12 GOLD stage II) were included (n = 133). 20,097 probes were generated from a small airway epithelium (SAE) microarray dataset obtained from these subjects previously. Subsequently, the association between gene expression levels and smoking and COPD, respectively, was assessed using: AdaBoost Classifcation Trees, Decision Tree, Gradient Boosting Machines, Naive Bayes, Neural Network, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine and adaptive LASSO, Elastic-Net, and Ridge logistic regression analyses. Using this methodology, we identifed 44 candidate genes, 27 of these genes had been previously been reported as important factors in the pathogenesis of COPD or regulation of lung function. Here, we also identifed 17 genes, which have not been previously identifed to be associated with the pathogenesis of COPD or the regulation of lung function. The most signifcantly regulated of these genes included: PRKAR2B, GAD1, LINC00930 and SLITRK6. These novel genes may provide the basis for the future development of novel therapeutics in COPD and its associated morbidities.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Figure and Table Legends
    Supplemental figure and table legends Supplementary Figure 1: KIAA1841 is well conserved among vertebrates. NCBI HomoloGene pairwise alignment scores of human KIAA1841 sequence compared to other vertebrate orthologs. Supplementary Figure 2: µ-germline transcripts (GLT) and AID mRNA expression are not affected by overexpression of KIAA1841. Splenic B cells were isolated from wild-type mice, and transduced with retroviral vector control (pMIG) or a vector expressing KIAA1841. Levels of µ-GLT and AID mRNA were determined at 72h post-infection by RT-qPCR, and normalized to -actin mRNA and the pMIG control. The mean of three independent experiments +/- SD is shown. NS, p = not significant, p 0.05, two-tailed paired student’s t-test. Supplementary Figure 3: Overexpression of untagged and Xpress-tagged KIAA1841 does not affect cell proliferation. Splenic B cells were isolated from wild-type mice, stimulated with LPS+IL4, and transduced with retroviral vector control (pMIG) or a vector expressing KIAA1841 or Xpress (Xp)-tagged KIAA1841. Cells are labeled with seminaphthorhodafluor (SNARF) cell tracking dye and SNARF intensity was measured at 0h, 24h, and 48h after retroviral infection. Histograms of transduced cells (GFP+) for pMIG control, KIAA1841 and Xp-KIAA1841 were superimposed at each time point. Three independent retroviral infection experiments are shown. Supplementary Figure 4: Sequence alignment of the putative SANT domain of KIAA1841 with the SANT domain of SWI3. Alignment was performed using ClustalOmega; *, conserved residue, :, strongly similar residues, ., weakly similar residues. Numbers indicate amino acid residues in each sequence. Helix 3, which has been reported to be important for the chromatin remodeling function of SWI3 (Boyer et.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Genomic Evidence for Self-Domestication in Homo Sapiens
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/125799; this version posted April 9, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Comparative genomic evidence for self-domestication in Homo sapiens Constantina Theofanopoulou1,2,a, Simone Gastaldon1,a, Thomas O’Rourke1, Bridget D. Samuels3, Angela Messner1, Pedro Tiago Martins1, Francesco Delogu4, Saleh Alamri1, and Cedric Boeckx1,2,5,b 1Section of General Linguistics, Universitat de Barcelona 2Universitat de Barcelona Institute for Complex Systems 3Center for Craniofacial Molecular Biology, University of Southern California 4Department of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Food Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU) 5ICREA aThese authors contributed equally to this work bCorresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT This study identifies and analyzes statistically significant overlaps between selective sweep screens in anatomically modern humans and several domesticated species. The results obtained suggest that (paleo-)genomic data can be exploited to complement the fossil record and support the idea of self-domestication in Homo sapiens, a process that likely intensified as our species populated its niche. Our analysis lends support to attempts to capture the “domestication syndrome” in terms of alterations to certain signaling pathways and cell lineages, such as the neural crest. Introduction Recent advances in genomics, coupled with other sources of information, offer new opportunities to test long-standing hypotheses about human evolution. Especially in the domain of cognition, the retrieval of ancient DNA could, with the help of well-articulated linking hypotheses connecting genes, brain and cognition, shed light on the emergence of ‘cognitive modernity’.
    [Show full text]
  • A Concise Review of Human Brain Methylome During Aging and Neurodegenerative Diseases
    BMB Rep. 2019; 52(10): 577-588 BMB www.bmbreports.org Reports Invited Mini Review A concise review of human brain methylome during aging and neurodegenerative diseases Renuka Prasad G & Eek-hoon Jho* Department of Life Science, University of Seoul, Seoul 02504, Korea DNA methylation at CpG sites is an essential epigenetic mark position of carbon in the cytosine within CG dinucleotides that regulates gene expression during mammalian development with resultant formation of 5mC. The symmetrical CG and diseases. Methylome refers to the entire set of methylation dinucleotides are also called as CpG, due to the presence of modifications present in the whole genome. Over the last phosphodiester bond between cytosine and guanine. The several years, an increasing number of reports on brain DNA human genome contains short lengths of DNA (∼1,000 bp) in methylome reported the association between aberrant which CpG is commonly located (∼1 per 10 bp) in methylation and the abnormalities in the expression of critical unmethylated form and referred as CpG islands; they genes known to have critical roles during aging and neuro- commonly overlap with the transcription start sites (TSSs) of degenerative diseases. Consequently, the role of methylation genes. In human DNA, 5mC is present in approximately 1.5% in understanding neurodegenerative diseases has been under of the whole genome and CpG base pairs are 5-fold enriched focus. This review outlines the current knowledge of the human in CpG islands than other regions of the genome (3, 4). CpG brain DNA methylomes during aging and neurodegenerative islands have the following salient features. In the human diseases.
    [Show full text]