Geoforum Editors
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Degradation, Restitution and the Elusive Culture of Rural-Urban Thinking
Degradation, restitution and the elusive culture of rural-urban thinking MIREK DYMITROW Dymitrow, Mirek (2017). Degradation, restitution and the elusive culture of rural-urban thinking. Fennia 195: 1, pp. 36–60. ISSN 1798-5617. Despite fierce criticisms, ‘rural’ and ‘urban’ still constitute powerful narratives around which we structure our society. The ‘formal reality’, however, frequently disregards the cultural nature of these concepts, elevating them to the role of objective spaces apt to serve as acceptable guiding perspectives. While the analytical inadequacy of rural-urban ideations is well-documented, the phenomenon of formal-cultural conflation remains much less explored. Acknowledging that ideational space of social representations can only exist through the practices of discursive interaction, this paper’s objective is to lay bare the phenomenon of rural-urban thinking when externalized through the little-known practices of ‘degradation’ and ‘restitution’ in Poland. Using conceptual methods, including discourse analysis and historical deconstruction, this paper assays the hidden architectures of formal-cultural conflation by means of a richly contextualized analysis. The findings, presented in four discursive openings, reveal embedded elements of hierarchy, loss, injustice and self-victimization, which may create a divisive culture spawned by elusive promises of development at the cost of misinterpretations of history, local disappointment and cultural segmentation. In conclusion, formal appropriation of historical concepts is likely to engender a cultural geography of discord spun around a largely insignificant division, especially when development-oriented aspects of urbanization become entwined with emotional issues. Keywords: rural-urban, cultural-formal, degradation, restitution, discourse analysis, Poland Mirek Dymitrow, Department of Economy and Society, Human Geography Unit, School of Business, Economics and Law, University of Gothenburg, P.O. -
The Politics of Indexing and Ranking Academic Journals
The Politics of Indexing and Ranking Academic Journals The ACME Editorial Collective1 As part of a recent application to Canada’s Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) for funding to support publication of ACME,2 the journal’s editorial collective was required to provide information on “impact measures” for the journal as well as information on the indexes and journal aggregators that list ACME. The SSHRC instructions stated simply: Provide information on impact measures (or, in the absence of any third-party impact measures, describe the impact your journal has had). Identify the individual indexes and journal aggregators in which the journal is listed. (SSHRC, 2007, 6) At first blush, these instructions are pretty straightforward, but on further reflection — and put in their wider context – it becomes clear that there are some rather significant politics at play within these seemingly simple requests for mere “technical” information (Berg, 2006; Paasi, 2005; Sheppard, 2006). The problematic character of impact measures was reinforced for us when, as a result of our SSHRC application, we recently considered submitting an application to include ACME in the widely used ISI Web of Science journal index. Our intention was to increase the exposure of ACME to students and members of the academic community. However, our objective was to have the journal indexed in ISI, but not included in what we see as the onerous system of journal rankings 1 © ACME Editorial Collective, 2007 2 This application was successful, and we are grateful to SSHRC for supporting the journal for 2007-08. This support will allow ACME to increase the number of issues per volume. -
Socially Just Publishing: Implications for Geographers and Their Journals
Reflections: On Publishing Socially just publishing: implications for geographers and their journals SIMON BATTERBURY Batterbury, Simon (2017). Socially just publishing: implications for geographers and their journals. Fennia 195: 2, pp. 175–181. ISSN 1798-5617. There have been a range of protests against the high journal subscription costs, and author processing charges (APCs) levied for publishing in the more prestigious and commercially run journals that are favoured by geographers. But open protests across the sector like the ‘Academic Spring’ of 2012, and challenges to commercial copyright agreements, have been fragmented and less than successful. I renew the argument for ‘socially just’ publishing in geography. For geographers this is not limited to choosing alternative publication venues. It also involves a considerable effort by senior faculty members that are assessing hiring and promotion cases, to read and assess scholarship independently of its place of publication, and to reward the efforts of colleagues that offer their work as a public good. Criteria other than the citation index and prestige of a journal need to be foregrounded. Geographers can also be publishers, and I offer my experience editing the free onlineJournal of Political Ecology. Keywords: academic publishing, Open Access, geography journals, social justice, Journal of Political Ecology Simon Batterbury, Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, UK & School of Geography, University of Melbourne, 3010 VIC, Australia. E-mail: [email protected] Introduction Publishing articles in academic journals is a mainstay of scholarly activity. It is not done just to disseminate research findings, or to craft an elegant argument. It is strongly linked to the individual reputation of authors, their prestige and job and promotion prospects, and it also affects the reputations of departments and academic institutions that employ them. -
Anne Buttimer. 1938-2017. Geography and Biography Federico Ferretti, Alun Jones
Anne Buttimer. 1938-2017. Geography and Biography Federico Ferretti, Alun Jones To cite this version: Federico Ferretti, Alun Jones. Anne Buttimer. 1938-2017. Geography and Biography. Geographers. Biobibliographical Studies, 37 (37), pp.13-40, 2018, 978-1-350085-50-3. hal-01978197v2 HAL Id: hal-01978197 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01978197v2 Submitted on 24 Mar 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Anne Buttimer 1938–2017. Geography and Biography Federico Ferretti Alun Jones UCD School of Geography On 15 July 2017, sad news began to circulate in geographical milieus that Anne Buttimer had passed away. Buttimer was an international, transcultural and cosmopolitan geographer, known internationally for her innovative research, her command of languages, her humanity. To write her biography is a challenging task, but simultaneously an inspiring one, not least because she was one of the geographers most committed to the values of biography (and autobiography) in the discipline. Through the Dialogue Project that she launched with Torsten Hägerstrand, she valued life experiences as a critical tool in making sense of geographical engagement and was one of the co-founders of the IGU Commission on the History of Geography. -
Free Information, Not Free Labor
City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Publications and Research Bronx Community College 2019 Free Information, Not Free Labor Edward Lehner CUNY Bronx Community College John R. Ziegler CUNY Bronx Community College How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/bx_pubs/75 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] 1 Free Information, Not Free Labor Edward Lehner Bronx Community College, City University of New York, USA John R. Ziegler Bronx Community College, City University of New York, USA ABSTRACT The increased institutional demand for all faculty to publish scholarly work, even for faculty in non-research institutions, has created a near perfect two-sided market effect for commercial entities to profit from the labor of already overburdened academics while offering little-to-no compensation to these individuals or their institutions. As significant, institutional-level pushback against the cost of access to scholarly materials has begun to coalesce, it seems prudent if not pressing to revisit once more the longstanding debates over labor, cost, and access in scholarly publishing and to argue for more ethical, equitable, and democratizing models. To that end, this essay 1) argues for the notion that all for-profit commercial academic publishing and distribution is predatory and perpetuates an unethical labor model in which commercial entities profit from free labor in the academy and 2) asks how the open source movement offers a model for more ethical, non-profit publishing practices. -
Democratising Knowledge: a Report on the Scholarly Publisher, Elsevier
Education International Research Democratising Knowledge: a report on the scholarly publisher, Elsevier Dr. Jonathan Tennant October 2018 Education International Research Democratising Knowledge: a report on the scholarly publisher, Elsevier Dr. Jonathan Tennant October 2018 This work is licensed under a Creative Published by Education International - Oct. 2018 Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- ISBN 978-92-95109-72-8 (PDF) ShareAlike 4.0 International License. (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) Cover: Fredk - EI About the author: Dr. Jonathan Tennant Nomadic Palaeontologist, Rogue Open Scientist; PhD, MEarthSci, MSc Founder of paleorXiv (https://paleorxiv.org/), a free digital publishing platform for Palaeontology Companion Website on Github Founder of the Open Science MOOC (https://opensciencemooc.github.io/site/) Project development on GitHub Freelance science communicator and consultant Author of Excavate! Dinosaurs and World of Dinosaurs (coming 2018) Executive Editor of Geoscience Communication Editor for the PLOS Paleo Community Personal website - Home of the Green Tea and Velociraptors blog. ORCID: 0000-0001-7794-0218 Twitter: @protohedgehog Education International Education International represents organisations of teachers and other education employees across the globe. It is the world’s largest federation of unions and associations, representing thirty million education employees in about four hundred organisations in one hundred and seventy countries and territories, across the globe. Education International unites teachers and education employees. -
Collective Editorial on the Neoliberal University
Collective editorial on the neoliberal university This collective editorial on the neoliberal university follows eight days of strike action at sixty UK universities called by the University and College Union (UCU) in two separate legal disputes, one on pensions and one on pay and working conditions. Anticipating the recent labor strike after previous industrial disputes in 2018 at UK universities, the work included here emanates from two dialogues at the Nordic Geographers Meeting (NGM) in summer 2019, a public meeting called Protest Pub and a conference session on the neoliberal subject and the neoliberal academy. After an opening statement by the editors, this collective endeavor begins with the urgent collaborative action of graduate students and early-career academics and is followed by reflections on life in the neoliberal academy from those involved in the dialogues at the NGM 2019 in Trondheim. Additionally, the editorial introduces the content of the present issue. Keywords: collective action, neoliberalism, university, academia, knowledge, industrial dispute, casualization, labor strike, trade union Opening statement on collective action In the immediate aftermath of eight days of strike action at sixty UK universities concerning legal disputes regarding pensions, pay and working conditions, we offer a collective editorial on the fight for the soul of the university campus. Pay, equality, casualization and workloads are key battlegrounds and talking points on the picket line, and beyond the UK we hear from voices railing against the increasing marketization and neoliberalization of universities, staff and students, which is affecting collegiality, and collaborative and collective endeavor. For in the neoliberal university, the academic subject is an individual profile with a portfolio of research, highly mobile and online, rendering the place in which one resides and the people one shares a corridor with redundant as the platform university comes into view. -
Six Sideways Reflections on Academic Publishing
Six sideways reflections on academic publishing To examine the world is to reveal divergences, a range of potential polities, societies, and spaces, other to the conventional defined space of the research paper on the page. Yet it is possible to push at the edges of a research paper, and kick back against the standardization of scholarship. For variety and a breadth of scholarship is a symbolic and important characteristic of geography as a discipline. A present tragedy of publishing in the academic world is that, as international scholars, we are all increasingly pressured to produce research papers that meet certain externally imposed standards. This monitoring of academia through corporate/capitalist frameworks, can lead to the publishing of ‘safe pieces’, in place of texts that move disciplinary debates radically forward. The Reflections section of this journal was set up with this exact issue in mind. In order to produce lively, critical, inventive interjections on current societal issues, and to open-out what is considered geographical endeavor through creative practice, and in essence, to subvert the research paper itself. It is dedicated to publishing Reflections on issues relevant to, and in, contemporary geographies, offering a space for empirically grounded as well as theoretically informed research. Pushing at the margins of the discipline is its aim, and its revolutionary agenda is to argue that the traditional craft of essay writing perhaps needs to be returned to the forefront of academia; essays that take a walk beyond the norm, other to the standardized research paper format of present (Forsdick 2005). It seems that nowadays more regularly, rather than writing what we want to write as scholars we are instead – through an increasingly crude quantitative measurement – writing what we think we have to write. -
Reclaiming Society Publishing
Publications 2015, 3, 150-154; doi:10.3390/publications3030150 OPEN ACCESS publications ISSN 2304-6775 www.mdpi.com/journal/publications Article Reclaiming Society Publishing Philip E. Steinberg Department of Geography, Durham University, Lower Mountjoy, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +44-191-334-1945 Academic Editor: Andrew Kirby Received: 19 May 2015 / Accepted: 30 June 2015 / Published: 13 July 2015 Abstract: Learned societies have become aligned with commercial publishers, who have increasingly taken over the latter’s function as independent providers of scholarly information. Using the example of geographical societies, the advantages and disadvantages of this trend are examined. It is argued that in an era of digital publication, learned societies can offer leadership with a new model of open access that can guarantee high quality scholarly material whose publication costs are supported by society membership dues. Keywords: learned societies; geographical societies; commercial publishing; scholarly publishing; open access Among the numerous changes effecting academic publishing since the 1970s, one of the most profound has been the commercialization of society publications. To illustrate, my own publication record as a human geographer is indicative. Since 1994, when I first published in a peer-reviewed journal, I have had English-language publications in 38 academic journals. Of these, however, only three journals were society publications not published by commercial publishers. Furthermore, of the three, none was the journal of a major national disciplinary learned society (one was Historical Geography, the annual journal of the Association of American Geographers’ Historical Geography Specialty Group, and the other two were online publications associated with interdisciplinary societies) 1. -
Uneven Writing Spaces in Academic Publishing
UNEVEN WRITING SPACES IN ACADEMIC PUBLISHING: A Case Study on Internationalisation in the Disciplines of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Barbara Rivera Lopez SN 15077463 INSTG099 MA Dissertation September 1st 2016 MA in Publishing Word Count: 10,059 Supervisor: Nick Canty This dissertation is submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Master's degree in MA in Publishing, UCL. Abstract More than 70% of the output of the highest impact international journals is produced by American and British scholars in the disciplines of Human Geography and Marketing (Gutierrez and Lopez-Nieva, 2001; Rosenstreich and Wooliscroft, 2006; Bański and Ferenc, 2013). Additionally, 85.3% of the editorial board members of international Marketing journals are based in the US (Rosenstreich and Wooliscroft, 2006). Furthermore, 95% of the journals in the Web of Science database use English as their language of publication (Paasi, 2015). These empirical data seem to indicate that international publication spaces are dominated by US and UK-based research (Paasi, 2015). In this context, this research seeks to deepen the debate by focusing on a new research unit: references. Through case studies on the referencing of the three higher impact journals in the disciplines of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (PLoS Biology, Cell, and Reviews of Biochemistry) it was possible to identify, describe and visually represent the spatial patterns of knowledge production. The main findings support previous literature; 74.9% of the references surveyed had at least one author from either the US or the UK. Moreover, there was a notable predominance of authors from the US (69.9%). Furthermore, there was a high preponderance of authors from English- speaking countries (88.32%). -
Open Access Publishing: Hypocrisy and Confusion in Geography
Open Access Publishing: Hypocrisy and Confusion in Geography Jenny Pickerill Department of Geography, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, UK; [email protected] Debates about the possibilities and importance of open access publishing in academia are reaching a crucial stage. British universities are implementing “author archiving”, electronically storing their staff’s outputs for online public access. At the same time, an increasing number of academics are calling for an overhaul of journal publishing processes—urging us to sign a petition to the European Commission in support of open access (EC Petition 2007). Journal publishers are fighting a rearguard action in response. This ranges from making some of their content freely available, to creating complicated licence forms allowing authors to only post articles online several months (in some cases years) after publication; the chief concern of publishers is the potentially dramatic loss of revenue (Shepherd 2007). The result for academics is a messy and confusing situation where even fine attention to the small print of such licences offers little clarity. Whether we are correctly abiding by these licences or not, there needs to be a more assertive discussion within academic geography about our outputs. Many geographers have critically engaged with our publishing practices, encouraging academics to write in more accessible styles and in nonacademic locations (Castree 2006; Mitchell 2006; Smith 2000). Condemnation of the negative consequences of the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) on how we publish abounds; as does criticism of the Anglo-American hegemony in our conferences and publishing (Minca 2003). Moreover, the recent campaign to boycott Elsevier publications (including Political Geography, Geoforum,and Applied Geography) due to their support for arms trading has highlighted how “academic practices are increasingly enmeshed with capitalist social relations through their links with, and dependency on, multinational publishing companies” (Chatterton and Featherstone 2006:5). -
Journal List of Scopus.Xlsx
Sourcerecord id Source Title (CSA excl.) (Medline-sourced journals are indicated in Green). Print-ISSN Including Conference Proceedings available in the scopus.com Source Browse list 16400154734 A + U-Architecture and Urbanism 03899160 5700161051 A Contrario. Revue interdisciplinaire de sciences sociales 16607880 19600162043 A.M.A. American Journal of Diseases of Children 00968994 19400157806 A.M.A. archives of dermatology 00965359 19600162081 A.M.A. Archives of Dermatology and Syphilology 00965979 19400157807 A.M.A. archives of industrial health 05673933 19600162082 A.M.A. Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Occupational Medicine 00966703 19400157808 A.M.A. archives of internal medicine 08882479 19400158171 A.M.A. archives of neurology 03758540 19400157809 A.M.A. archives of neurology and psychiatry 00966886 19400157810 A.M.A. archives of ophthalmology 00966339 19400157811 A.M.A. archives of otolaryngology 00966894 19400157812 A.M.A. archives of pathology 00966711 19400157813 A.M.A. archives of surgery 00966908 5800207606 AAA, Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 01715410 28033 AAC: Augmentative and Alternative Communication 07434618 50013 AACE International. Transactions of the Annual Meeting 15287106 19300156808 AACL Bioflux 18448143 4700152443 AACN Advanced Critical Care 15597768 26408 AACN clinical issues 10790713 51879 AACN clinical issues in critical care nursing 10467467 26729 AANA Journal 00946354 66438 AANNT journal / the American Association of Nephrology Nurses and Technicians 07441479 5100155055 AAO Journal 27096 AAOHN