Submitted to COALTECH Research Association Native Species Trial
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
The Evaluation of Three Native Grass Species and a Tree Species as a Vegetation Option for Coal Mine Rehabilitation on the Mpumalanga Highveld of South Africa By Martin Platt Submitted to COALTECH Research Association Native Species Trial 1 ABSTARCT Three field trials were established in early March 2004 on topsoil prepared for seeding at Kleinkopje Colliery, Optimum Colliery and Syferfontein Colliery, all situated on the Mpumalanga Highveld of South Africa. Cynodon dactylon , Themeda triandra , and Hyparrhenia hirta plugs were established in plots and were treated with and without fertilizer. Field measurement of survivorship, cover, and biomass production, were taken until July 2007. Acacia sieberana was also established and was evaluated for survivability, height and basal diameter. The results indicate that Cynodon dactylon out-performed the Themeda triandra and Hyparrhenia hirta , achieving 100% survivability and cover at all sites by 2007, regardless of fertilizer addition. Trees were able to establish at Kleinkopje Colliery attaining 97% survivability by the end of the trial, but performed poorly at Optimum Colliery and Syferfontein Colliery. Establishing plugs as a vegetative option on mined land could be used when slopes for a planter machine is too steep, and in establishing buffers against pasture grass intrusion into ecologically sensitive areas. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTARCT .......................................................................................................................i TABLE OF CONTENTS .....................................................................................................ii CHAPTER 1 LITERATUREREVIEW …………………………………………………………………………………………………1 1.1 INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………………………………..1 1.2 OPENCAST MINING AND REHABILITATION METHOD…………………………………….2 1.3 SOIL COMPACTION………………………………………………………………………………………..3 1.4 SOIL AMELIORANTS………………………………….……………………………………………………4 CHAPTER 2 MATERILAS AND METHOD.. ……………………………………………………………………………………..5 2.1 EXPERIMENTAL LAYOUT………………………………………………………………………………..5 2.1.1 SITE DESCRIPTION………………………………………………………………………………5 2.1.1.1 KLEINKOPJE COLLIERY…………………………………………………………….5 2.1.1.2 OPTIMUM COLLIERY………………………………………………………………5 2.1.1.3 SYFERFONTEIN COLLIERY……………………………………………………….6 2.2 EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN…………………………………………………………………………………6 2.2.1 TRIAL ESTABLISHMENT………………………………………………………………………6 2.2.2 SPECIES………………………………………………………………………………………………8 2.3 TRIAL SETUP………………………………………………………………………………………………….8 2.3.1 PLANTING………………………………………………………………………………………….8 2.3.2 FERTILIZER APPLICATION…………………………………………………………………..8 MAINTENANCE……………………………………………………………………………………………..9 2.4 FIELD MEASUREMENTS……………………………………………………………………………….10 2.4.1 SURVIVORSHIP…………………………………………………………………………………10 2.4.2 COVER……………………………………………………………………………………………..10 2.4.3 BIOMASS……………………………………………...............................................11 2.4.4 TREE SURVIVORSHIP………………………………………………………………………..12 2.4.5 TREE HEIGHT……………………………………………………………………………………12 2.4.6 TREE BASAL COVER………………………………………………………………………….13 CHAPTER 3 RESULTS ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….14 3.1 KLEINKOPJE COLLIERY………………………………………………………………………………….14 3.1.1 SURVIVORSHIP…………………………………………………………………………………14 3.1.2 COVER……………………………………………………………………………………………..15 3.1.3 BIOMASS…………………………………….…………………………………………………..16 3.1.4 TREE SURVIVORSHIP…………………………………………..……………………………17 3.1.5 TREE HEIGHT……………………………………………………………..…………………….17 3.1.6 TREE BASAL DIAMETER…………………………………………………….………………17 3.2 OPTIMUM COLLIERY……………………………………………………………………………………20 3 3.2.1 SURVIVORSHIP…………………………………………………………………………………20 3.2.2 COVER……………………………………………………………………………………………..21 3.2.3 BIOMASS………………………………………………………………………………………….22 3.2.4 TREE SURVIVORSHIP………………………………………………………………………..23 3.2.5 TREE HEIGHT DIAMETER………………………………………………………………….23 3.3 SYFERFONTEIN COLLIERY…………………………………………………………………….………24 3.3.1 SURVIVORSHIP…………………………………………………………………………………24 3.3.2 COVER……………………………………………………………………………………………..25 3.3.3 BIOMASS………………………………………………………………………………………….26 3.3.4 TREE SURVIVORSHIP…………………………………………………………................26 3.3.5 TREE HEIGHT……………………………………………………………………………………27 3.3.6 TREE BASAL DIAMETER…………………………………………………………………….27 CHAPTER 4 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS ……………………………………………………………………………28 4.1 SURVIVORSHIP…………………………………………………………………………………………….28 4.2 COVER…………………………………………………………………………………………………………30 4.3 BIOMASS……………………………………………………………………………………………….......31 4.4 TREE DATA…………………………………………………………………………………………………..31 4.5 RECOMMENDATIONS………………………………………………………………………………….33 CHAPTER 5 REFERNCES ………………………………………………………………………………………………………...……3 4 4 CHAPTER 1 LITERATURE REVIEW 1.1 Introduction Coal is the world’s most abundant and widely distributed fossil fuel and it remains the primary energy source for several countries world-wide. In South Africa, coal mining makes a significant contribution to economic activity, development of sustainable job opportunities and foreign exchange earnings. The coal mining sector contributes 1.8% the South Africa’s GDP. Coal extraction is essentially mined by two methods, namely underground and opencast method. Unfortunately, these are very destructive processes, and the environmental implications associated with this very serious. Unfortunately, highly potential agricultural lands, ecologically sensitive environments and surrounds are compromised for development, often resulting in loss of ecosystem value. A large portion of coal reserves and operation on the Eastern Highveld is situated in the heart of the South African grassland biome. On a global scale, this biome is considered to be one of the most devastated, and the South African grassland biome has been identified as critically endangered (Olsen and Dinerstein, 1998). In South Africa, the grassland biome covers an area of approximately 349 174 km 2 (Neke and Du Plessis, 2004). Approximately 100 000 ha has already been transformed or destroyed by opencast and underground mining on the Eastern Highveld of South Africa (Neke and Du Plessis, 2004). According to Neke and Du Plessis (2004), this could increase to 325 081 ha with the amount economically mineable coal available in the area. By law (Minerals and Petroleum Resources Act of 2002; National Environmental Management Act) opencast mines have to be rehabilitated and the post mining landscape returned to a sustainable land use. Although the objective of most 5 rehabilitation programs aim to restore land to its pre-mining agricultural land capability (Mentis, 2006) by establishing a pasture with fertilizer-responsive grass species on topsoil replaced topsoil. These pastures are made productive through defoliation management and fertilizer additions. After a few years, reversion to native grassland is opted for by withdrawing fertilizer application and applying defoliation management. However, this is a very slow process of secondary succession and often pre-mining ecological status is not achieved (Mentis, 2006). 1.2 Opencast Mining and Rehabilitation Method The Vryheid Formation (Ecca Group) of the Karoo Sequence, which is present on the Eastern Highveld of South Africa, attains some 140 m at the thickest point and contains a number coal seam, of which four are considered to have economic potential. Mining this coal is dependent on the economic limit of the depth of over burden above the coal seam, which could reach up to 30 m, and the thickness of the underlying coal seam. In order to access the coal, the material above the coal seam (known as burden material), is excavated and removed. Once the overburden is exposed, it is drilled, blasted and then removed. This material is placed such that it can be profiled, typically by dozer. The slope and depth of topsoil placed on the profiled burden material, ultimately determines the post mining land class capability for that area. Before the overburden is removed, topsoil is stripped and is either stockpiled or is placed on profiled overburden material. The placed topsoil is then levelled, thus creating a surface for seeding, and later vegetation establishment. The seed mix used for seeding typically comprises an annual species such as Eragrostis teff in combination with perennial species. Such species might include Chloris gayana, Cenchrus ciliaris, Cynodon dactylon, Digiteria eriantha, Eragrostis curvula, Eragrostis teff, and Medicago sativa (Mentis, 1999). The ratio of the seed 6 mix used for re-vegetation is usually specified in the mine’s Environmental Management Programme (EMP). 1.3 Soil Compaction The process by which topsoil is stripped, stockpiled and placed on regarded burden material often results in severe compaction. This is detrimental to the physical, chemical and biological properties of the soil. Consequently, these soils have lower soil aggregate stability, lower infiltration rates, reduced water holding capacity, and a greater capacity to resist root extension (Chapman et al , 1994), all of which inhibit the potential for plant growth and establishment on the rehabilitated soil. The major cause of soil compaction is trafficking of machinery on re-placed soil. This is further exacerbated by settling under gravity and (Haigh, 2000). As a consequence of this the particle-to-particle contact within the soil increases and the percentage of macro pores decreases (Haigh, 2000). This affects nutrient availability with de- nitrification a result of anaerobic conditions (Davies et al , 1995). Because of these changes, the soil becomes a less favourable environment for soil organisms reducing growth of surface vegetation (Haigh, 2000). The soil