DOCSLIB.ORG

Department of Defense Board on Diversity and Inclusion Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Department of Defense Board on Diversity and Inclusion Report Department of Defense Board on Diversity and Inclusion Report Recommendations to Improve Racial and Ethnic Diversity and Inclusion in the U.S. Military Contents Figures and Tables ................................................................................................................. iv Executive Summary ............................................................................................................... vii SECTION I: Overview ................................................................................................................1 Historical and Cultural Context ..........................................................................................1 The Military Leadership Diversity Commission and Impact on DoD D&I Efforts ..............2 2020 Secretary of Defense Directive ....................................................................................4 SECTION II: Current State of Diversity and Inclusion Within DoD ............................................7 Current Statistics on Representation ...................................................................................7 Promotion and Retention of Racial and Ethnic Minority Officers .....................................10 SECTION III: Board Composition and Methodology ...............................................................13 Data Sources to Inform Recommendation Development ...................................................13 Recommendation Selection and Refinement ......................................................................14 Rationale for Recommendations Proposed for Referral, Deferral, or Further Research .....16 SECTION IV: Board Recommendations ....................................................................................19 Recommendations by Focus Area......................................................................................19 SECTION V: Conclusion and Way Forward ..............................................................................43 APPENDIXES A: June 19, 2020, Secretary of Defense Memo ......................................................................45 B: July 14, 2020, Secretary of Defense Memo ......................................................................48 C: DoD Board on Diversity and Inclusion Charter ................................................................52 D: D&I Efforts and Initiatives ...............................................................................................57 E: MLDC Recommendations and Implementation Status ......................................................61 F: Expanded Immediate Actions from Services ......................................................................62 G: Referred/Deferred Recommendations and Further Research .............................................64 H: D&I Industry Best Practices .............................................................................................67 I: Service Member Listening Sessions and Crowdsourcing Protocol Guide and Template ......70 J: Service Member Crowdsourcing Campaign ......................................................................73 K: Abbreviations and Acronyms ............................................................................................75 iii Figures and Tables Figures Figure 1. History of Military Diversity and Inclusion Efforts ...............................................3 Figure 2. Racial and Ethnic Representation of Active and Reserve Component Enlisted and Officer Personnel Compared with Eligible U.S. Civilians..................8 Figure 3. Racial and Ethnic Representation of Active Component Enlisted and Officer Personnel, by Pay Grade, 2020 .................................................................9 Figure 4. Racial and Ethnic Representation of Reserve Component Enlisted and Officer Personnel, by Pay Grade, 2020 ...............................................................10 Figure 5. Crowdsourcing Flyer for Soliciting Service Member Feedback on Diversity and Inclusion Issues ............................................................................................14 Figure 6. Summary of the Recommendation Selection and Refinement Process .................15 Figure 7. Strategic Framework for DoD-Wide Diversity and Inclusion Recommendations ..............................................................................................16 Figure 8. The Evolution of Diversity and Inclusion in Industry ..........................................67 Tables Table 1. Active Duty Promotion and Retention Rates from O-1 Through O-4 and O-4 Through O-6 ................................................................................................11 Table 2. DoD Surveys with Diversity and Inclusion Measures ...........................................60 iv Disclaimer Reference to non-Federal entities, products, or services is solely for factual or explanatory purposes and is not intended as an endorsement by the Department of Defense of those entities, products, or services. Images: p. vi, Getty Images/iStockphoto; xii, Lisa Ferdinando, DOD; p. 6, Getty Images; p.11, Lisa Ferdinando, DOD; p.12, Air Force Tech. Sgt. Ned T. Johnston; p. 18, U.S. Army photo by Sgt. 1st Class Marisol Walker; p. 44, Adobe Stock v “We are committed to making the DoD a workplace of choice that is characterized by diversity, equality, and inclusion. We remain steadfast in our commitment to promote an environment free from barriers that may prevent personnel from realizing their potential and rising to the highest levels of responsibility within the Department. To that end, the Department continues to strengthen policies and procedures that promulgate the Diversity and Inclusion and Equal Opportunity missions. We continue to enhance diversity and ensure equality across our entire workforce. We believe diversity is the key to innovation, inclusion is imperative for cohesive teamwork, and equality is critical to Total Force readiness.” Department of Defense Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Statement Executive Summary Introduction or more than 200 years, the U.S. military has fought to defend this nation and its interests, earning the reputation as the greatest military force in history. The U.S. military attracts highly qualified men and women who represent a “This Board’s wide variety of creeds, religions, races, ethnicities, sexual orientations, and mission is to Fother attributes that make the people of this country stronger together. Moreover, achieve long- the Department of Defense (DoD) recognizes diversity and inclusion (D&I) as strategic imperatives—to ensure that the military across all grades reflects and is term impact—a inclusive of the American people it has sworn to protect and defend. commitment Throughout its history, the U.S. military has been a leader on issues of D&I. to making Yet this leadership role does not make it immune to the forces of bias and prejudice that directly and indirectly affect minority Service members. As America’s most transformational respected institution and a global leader, the U.S. military must continue to lead change that will on D&I issues, building diverse, winning teams and creating opportunity for all. become part of On June 19, 2020, then–Secretary of Defense Mark T. Esper directed the Department of wide-ranging initiatives to promote morale, cohesion, and force readiness, using a three-pronged approach composed of: Defense’s DNA. This Board’s ■ Identification of immediate actions that can be implemented to support a mandate is to more diverse and inclusive force. ■ Establishment of a Department of Defense Board on Diversity and move forward Inclusion (the “Board”) tasked with identifying additional actions related with alacrity to D&I policies and processes. and positively ■ Founding of an independent federal advisory committee, the Defense transform Advisory Committee on Diversity and Inclusion (DACODAI), to provide autonomous, continuous review and assessment of the military’s actions in the Defense this mission area. Department for today’s Service This effort reinforces a half century of policies, programs, and practices insti- tuted by DoD to create an inclusive environment that harnesses each Service members and for member’s potential. The U.S. military has traversed fundamental socio-political generations to eras that situated DoD as a pioneering force in racial and ethnic D&I. As the come.” largest meritocracy in the country, DoD embraces D&I for all its Service members Secretary of the Air Force and fosters an environment in which they can rise to positions of responsibility and Board Chair, and leadership. While the military has been a leader in racial integration and inclu- Barbara M. Barrett sion, it nevertheless is not immune to the perils of bias and prejudice. This report recommends aggressive integration of D&I into Military Department culture to build upon decades of progress and transform DoD for today’s Service members and for generations to come. vii Current State man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness (USD(P&R)), and DoD has observed modest increases in minority Service members from each branch of the DoD Military demographic representation in officer grades since Services and the National Guard. Advisors to the Board the transition to an all-volunteer force, but persistent included representatives from the DoD Office of Force underrepresentation in senior officer grades continues. Resiliency, DoD Office of the General Counsel,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Textual Analysis of US Army and US Navy Recruiting Advertisements From
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2009 The changing face of the U.S. military: a textual analysis of U.S. Army and U.S. Navy recruiting advertisements from pre-9-11 to six years into the Iraq War Maryann M. Rowland Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Mass Communication Commons Recommended Citation Rowland, Maryann M., "The changing face of the U.S. military: a textual analysis of U.S. Army and U.S. Navy recruiting advertisements from pre-9-11 to six years into the Iraq War" (2009). LSU Master's Theses. 1151. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/1151 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE CHANGING FACE OF THE U.S. MILITARY: A TEXTUAL ANALYSIS OF U.S. ARMY AND U.S. NAVY RECRUITING ADVERTISEMENTS FROM PRE-9-11 TO SIX YEARS INTO THE IRAQ WAR A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Mass Communication in The Manship School of Mass Communication by Maryann Rowland B.A., University of Central Florida, 2006 May 2009 AKNOWLEDGMENTS The completion of this thesis would not have been possible without the help and support of many people.
    [Show full text]
  • Stability and Arms Control in Europe: the Role of Military Forces Within a European Security System
    Stability and Arms Control in Europe: The Role of Military Forces within a European Security System A SIPRI Research Report Edited by Dr Gerhard Wachter, Lt-General (Rtd) and Dr Axel Krohn sipri Stockholm International Peace Research Institute July 1989 Copyright © 1989 SIPRI All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN 91-85114-50-2 Typeset and originated by Stockholm International Peace Research Institute Printed and bound in Sweden by Ingeniörskopia Solna Abstract Wachter, G. and Krohn, A., eds, Stability and Arms Control in Europe: The Role of Military Forces within a European Security System, A SIPRI Research Report (SIPRI: Solna, Sweden, 1989), 113 pp. This report presents the outcome of a project which was initiated at SIPRI in 1987. It was supported by a grant from the Volkswagen Stiftung of the Federal Republic of Germany. The introductory chapter by the editors presents a scenario for a possible future European security system. Six essays by active NATO and WTO military officers focus on the role of military forces in such a system. Various approaches to the tasks and size of military forces in this regime of strict non-provocative defence are presented with the intent of providing new ideas for the debate on restructuring of forces in Europe. There are 3 maps, 7 tables and 11 figures. Sponsored by the Volkswagen Stiftung. Contents Preface vi Acknowledgements viii The role of military forces within a European security system 1 G.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Publication 0-2
    Joint Publication 0-2 IQ 0.- x. y a. ACLU-RDI 250 p.1 DODD0A-001597 The enduring theme, "joint warfare is team warfare," is an attitude based on the foundation of joint doctrine that is universally understood and practiced. This team approach ensures the most effective employment of US forces for joint warfare. If we are to continue to improve the structure of US forces for ioint warfare, everyone must be involved. Capstone publications Joint Warfare of the Armed Forces of the United States and this publication, Unified Action Armed Forces (UNAAF), provide the foundation for all the joint publications. Unified Action Armed Forces (UNAAF) provides the basic doctrine and policy governing the unified direction of forces and discusses the functions of the Department of Defense and its major components. This revision represents the evolution in US warfighting guidance since the last edition, serves as the policy document for all command relationships and other authorities directed by law, and clarifies these relationships. This publication also sets forth the concepts, relationships, and processes necessary for unified action of joint, interagency, and multinational operations and specifies fundamental principles and concepts for joint operations. The nature of modem warfare demands that we fight as a team. Unified action resulting from clear command relationships and unity of effort is crucial to making this possible. Commanders must ensure the widest distribution and application of this and other supporting joint publications in order to enable success in joint force employment. HENRY H. SHELTON Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff ACLU-RDI 250 p.2 PREFACE 1.
    [Show full text]
  • RECRUITING for DIFFERENCE and DIVERSITY in the U.S. MILITARY by JEREMIAH B. FAVARA a DISSERTATION Presented to the School of J
    RECRUITING FOR DIFFERENCE AND DIVERSITY IN THE U.S. MILITARY by JEREMIAH B. FAVARA A DISSERTATION Presented to the School of Journalism and Communication and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2017 DISSERTATION APPROVAL PAGE Student: Jeremiah B. Favara Title: Recruiting for Difference and Diversity in the U.S. Military This dissertation has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy degree in the School of Journalism and Communication by: Carol Stabile Chair Gretchen Soderlund Core Member Christopher Chávez Core Member Dan HoSang Core Member CJ Pascoe Institutional Representative and Sara D. Hodges Interim Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School Original approval signatures on file with the University of Oregon Graduate School. Degree awarded September 2017. ii © 2017 Jeremiah B. Favara iii DISSERTATION ABSTRACT Jeremiah B. Favara Doctor of Philosophy School of Journalism and Communication September 2017 Title: Recruiting for Difference and Diversity in the U.S. Military After shifting to an all-volunteer force (AVF) in 1973, the U.S. military was forced to expand recruiting efforts beyond the ideal figure of the white male soldier in order to meet personnel needs. Shaped by the economic realities of the AVF, such recruiting efforts sought to show individuals historically excluded from military service, namely women and people of color, that there was a place for them in the military. The presence of women and people of color in recruitment materials contributes to ideals of citizenship and articulates understanding of gender, race, sexuality, and class in relation to military inclusion.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of U.S. Military Policy from the Constitution to the Present
    C O R P O R A T I O N The Evolution of U.S. Military Policy from the Constitution to the Present Gian Gentile, Michael E. Linick, Michael Shurkin For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR1759 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-0-8330-9786-6 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2017 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface Since the earliest days of the Republic, American political and military leaders have debated and refined the national approach to providing an Army to win the nation’s independence and provide for its defense against all enemies, foreign and domestic.
    [Show full text]
  • US Military Policy in the Middle East an Appraisal US Military Policy in the Middle East: an Appraisal
    Research Paper Micah Zenko US and Americas Programme | October 2018 US Military Policy in the Middle East An Appraisal US Military Policy in the Middle East: An Appraisal Contents Summary 2 1 Introduction 3 2 Domestic Academic and Political Debates 7 3 Enduring and Current Presence 11 4 Security Cooperation: Training, Advice and Weapons Sales 21 5 Military Policy Objectives in the Middle East 27 Conclusion 31 About the Author 33 Acknowledgments 34 1 | Chatham House US Military Policy in the Middle East: An Appraisal Summary • Despite significant financial expenditure and thousands of lives lost, the American military presence in the Middle East retains bipartisan US support and incurs remarkably little oversight or public debate. Key US activities in the region consist of weapons sales to allied governments, military-to-military training programmes, counterterrorism operations and long-term troop deployments. • The US military presence in the Middle East is the culmination of a common bargain with Middle Eastern governments: security cooperation and military assistance in exchange for US access to military bases in the region. As a result, the US has substantial influence in the Middle East and can project military power quickly. However, working with partners whose interests sometimes conflict with one another has occasionally harmed long-term US objectives. • Since 1980, when President Carter remarked that outside intervention in the interests of the US in the Middle East would be ‘repelled by any means necessary’, the US has maintained a permanent and significant military presence in the region. • Two main schools of thought – ‘offshore balancing’ and ‘forward engagement’ – characterize the debate over the US presence in the Middle East.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Policy and the Causes of War: Eight Hypotheses
    1 MIT / 17.42 / Causes and Prevention of War Stephen Van Evera MILITARY POLICY AND THE CAUSES OF WAR: EIGHT HYPOTHESES I. FIRST MOVE ADVANTAGE (or "crisis instability"). "The greater the advantage that accrues to the side mobilizing or striking first, the greater the risk of war." See Schelling, Arms and Influence, chapter 6 (assigned). A. When does it pay / not pay / to move (mobilize or strike) first? 1. The problem is two-sided. If you have a first-move advantage, it pays your opponent to move first just to deny you the first-move advantage. 2. First-strike vs. first-mobilization advantages. Both are dangerous. B. Dangers raised by a first-move advantage (FMA): 1. Opportunistic war. ("If we strike first we win, so let's strike and capture the benefits of winning!") Not a profound point but many analysts don't get beyond it. 2. Preemptive war. "We fear they will strike, so we must strike." Examples: Israel's 1967 attack on Egypt; Russia's 1914 mobilization. And two extensions: -- "Accidental War." Example: 1890 Battle of Wounded Knee. -- "The Reciprocal Fear of Surprise Attack"--Schelling. ("We fear they fear we fear they will strike; so they may strike; so we must.") This is the common formulation of the problem but the least realistic. History shows that reciprocal fear almost never happens, perhaps because states seldom see themselves as threats to others so they seldom expect others to fear them. 3. The Dangers of Candor--the most serious of these 3 risks. States conceal their grievances and their capabilities because they think: "we must lull them into believing we are weak and benign; otherwise we can't gain surprise." This makes inadvertent war and wars of false optimism more likely.
    [Show full text]
  • Soldiers of Misfortune
    U.S. Violations of the Optional Protocol on the Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict SOLDIERS OF MISFORTUNE Abusive U.S. Military Recruitment and Failure to Protect Child Soldiers Jania Sandoval (right) speaks with U.S. Army recruiter Sfc. Luis Medina at Wright College in Chicago. (Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images) ABOUT THE ACLU ........................................................................................................ 1 INTRODUCTION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................... 2 RECOMMENDATIONS.................................................................................................. 5 I. TARGETING OF YOUTH UNDER 17 FOR MILITARY RECRUITMENT (Article 3(1)-(2)) ................................................................................................................ 8 a. Recruiters in High Schools Target Students Under 17 ........................................... 9 a. Joint Advertising Market Research & Studies (JAMRS) Database Targets Youth Under 17 for Recruitment ............................................................................................. 11 b. Junior Reserve Officer Training Corps (JROTC) Target Children as Young as 14 for Recruitment ............................................................................................................. 12 c. Middle School Cadet Corps (MSCC), or Pre-JROTC, Targets Children as Young as 11 .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • STRIKING FIRST – Preemptive and Preventive Attack in U.S. National
    THE ARTS This PDF document was made available CHILD POLICY from www.rand.org as a public service of CIVIL JUSTICE the RAND Corporation. EDUCATION ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT Jump down to document6 HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit NATIONAL SECURITY research organization providing POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY objective analysis and effective SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY solutions that address the challenges SUBSTANCE ABUSE facing the public and private sectors TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY around the world. TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE WORKFORCE AND WORKPLACE Support RAND Purchase this document Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore RAND Project AIR FORCE View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non- commercial use only. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND mono- graphs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. STRIKINGFIRST Preemptive and Preventive Attack in U.S. National Security Policy KARL P. MUELLER JASEN J. CASTILLO FORREST E. MORGAN NEGEEN PEGAHI BRIAN ROSEN Prepared for the United States Air Force Approved for public release; distribution unlimited The research described in this report was sponsored by the United States Air Force under Contract F49642-01-C-0003.
    [Show full text]
  • JP 2-02 National Intelligence Support to Joint Operations
    Joint Pub 2-02 National Intelligence Support to Joint Operations 28 September 1998 PREFACE 1. Scope from organizing the force and executing the mission in a manner the JFC deems most This joint publication describes national appropriate to ensure unity of effort in the intelligence organizations and their support accomplishment of the overall mission. to joint military operations. Also addressed is the special support and augmentation 3. Application available for joint operations by national joint elements such as the Military Intelligence a. Doctrine and guidance established in this Board, the National Military Joint Intelligence publication apply to the commanders and Center, and National Intelligence Support intelligence staff of combatant commands, Teams. This joint publication covers Service subordinate unified commands, joint task forces, intelligence organizations and centers, as combat support agencies, and subordinate well as nonmilitary agencies and components of these commands. These nongovernmental organizations. The principles and guidance also may apply when recommended target audience for this joint significant forces of one Service are attached to publication is commanders and intelligence forces of another Service or when significant staffs of combatant commands, subordinate forces of one Service support forces of another unified commands, joint task forces, combat Service. support agencies, and supporting Service components. b. The guidance in this publication is authoritative; as such, this doctrine (or JTTP) 2. Purpose will be followed except when, in the judgment of the commander, exceptional circumstances This publication has been prepared under dictate otherwise. If conflicts arise between the the direction of the Chairman of the Joint contents of this publication and the contents of Chiefs of Staff.
    [Show full text]
  • Counter Recruitment Materials
    The National Network Opposing the Militarization of Youth 2018/9 Back-to-school Kit for Counter-recruitment and School Demilitarization Organizing Back‐to‐school Kit for Counter‐recruitment and School Demilitarization Organizing WHAT IS IN THIS KIT? The kit is a catalog of basic material useful to educating young people and school personnel about the realities of military enlistment and war. The catalog also includes some information on alternatives to enlistment, as well as items written for organizers seeking to reach out to local schools. All of the material in this catalog was carefully reviewed for relevancy and accuracy as of the spring of 2018. A task force of knowledgeable organizers did the research. It does not include all of the available literature on this topic because much of what exists is out of date or is no longer being produced by the original sources. Consequently, we focused on identifying items that we felt were basic and most useful for effective organizing and educating. New items may be added to future kits as they become available. HOW TO USE THE KIT It’s very simple: Read the descriptions in the catalog and then go to the links that are listed to view or download documents that are relevant to your local organizing. In some cases, you will be able to reprint them for local reproduction; or, you will be able to order copies in bulk if they are offered by the original source. HOW THE KIT IS ORGANIZED: The catalog groups items into the following subject categories: Counter‐recruitment Non‐military Careers / College and Gender and the Military Delayed Entry Program (DEP) Service Alternatives JROTC Privacy (Opt Out Forms/ ASVAB Resources for Organizers NNOMY Contact Information etc.
    [Show full text]
  • JP 0-2, "Unified Action Armed Forces (UNAAF)"
    Joint Publication 0-2 Unified Action Armed Forces (UNAAF) 10 July 2001 The enduring theme, “joint warfare is team warfare,” is an attitude based on the foundation of joint doctrine that is universally understood and practiced. This team approach ensures the most effective employment of US forces for joint warfare. If we are to continue to improve the structure of US forces for joint warfare, everyone must be involved. Capstone publications Joint Warfare of the Armed Forces of the United States and this publication, Unified Action Armed Forces (UNAAF), provide the foundation for all the joint publications. Unified Action Armed Forces (UNAAF) provides the basic doctrine and policy governing the unified direction of forces and discusses the functions of the Department of Defense and its major components. This revision represents the evolution in US warfighting guidance since the last edition, serves as the policy document for all command relationships and other authorities directed by law, and clarifies these relationships. This publication also sets forth the concepts, relationships, and processes necessary for unified action of joint, interagency, and multinational operations and specifies fundamental principles and concepts for joint operations. The nature of modern warfare demands that we fight as a team. Unified action resulting from clear command relationships and unity of effort is crucial to making this possible. Commanders must ensure the widest distribution and application of this and other supporting joint publications in order to enable success in joint force employment. HENRY H. SHELTON Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff PREFACE 1. Scope publication to restrict the authority of the JFC from organizing the force and executing the The principles set forth in this publication mission in a manner the JFC deems most will be applied to accomplish congressional appropriate to ensure unity of effort in the intent expressed in the National Security Act accomplishment of the overall mission.
    [Show full text]