DOCSLIB.ORG

Morris Township, New Jersey 07962-1295 Telephone: 973.326.7600 | Fax: 973.644.2726 | TTY Relay: 7-1-1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Morris Township, New Jersey 07962-1295 Telephone: 973.326.7600 | Fax: 973.644.2726 | TTY Relay: 7-1-1 300 Mendham Road | P.O. Box 1295 | Morris Township, New Jersey 07962-1295 Telephone: 973.326.7600 | Fax: 973.644.2726 | TTY Relay: 7-1-1 www.morrisparks.net THE MORRIS COUNTY PARK COMMISSION DISTRIBUTION OF PARK COMMISSION WORKSHOP MEETING MINUTES Date October 11, 2016 1. President Betty Cass‐Schmidt 2. Vice President Barbara Shepard 3. Commissioner Julie C. Baron 4. Commissioner Stuart Lasser 5. Commission Edward G. McCarthy 6. Commissioner Mathew Tal 7. Commissioner Richard Seabury, III 8. Commissioner Louis A. Valori, Jr. 9. Commissioner Kim M. Wentworth 10. Executive Director David D. Helmer 11. Freeholder Liaison Douglas R. Cabana 12. File – 2 THE MORRIS COUNTY PARK COMMISSION 300 Mendham Road Morris Township, New Jersey President Cass-Schmidt called to order the 839th meeting of the Morris County Park Commission at 9:30 a.m. on Tuesday, October 11, 2016 in the Park Commission Board Room at The Cultural Center, 300 Mendham Road, Morris Township, New Jersey. Executive Director Helmer then read the following notice: PURSUANT TO N.J.S.A. 10:4-6 et seq., adequate notice of this meeting held at 9:30 a.m. on the 11th day of October, 2016, has been provided by publication in the Daily Record and The Star-Ledger, by posting of said notice in the Administration Building of the Morris County Park Commission, at the County Courthouse, and by filing a copy of the same with the Morris County Clerk, and by posting an Agenda on the Morris County Park Commission website. ROLL CALL The following were present: President Betty Cass-Schmidt Executive Director David D. Helmer Vice President Barbara Shepard Deputy Executive Director Richard Vitale Commissioner Julie C. Baron Park Counsel John Suminski Commissioner Stuart Lasser Commissioner Edward McCarthy Commissioner Richard Seabury Commissioner Valori Also in attendance were the following staff: Assistant Deputy Director of Cultural & Environmental Resources Zafonte, Director of Recreation Facilities Fauci, Director of Park Planning & Development Denise Chaplick, Park Police Chief DiPietro, Assistant Deputy Director/Development Lanza, Assistant Director of Historic Sites Laffey, Director of Parks and Visitor Services Biase, Manager of Park Maintenance Weisnet, Manager of Engineering Hutzelmann, Manager of Safety & Compliance Rack, Manager of Golf Manzi, Superintendent of Natural Resources Kovacevic and Recreation Supervisor Robertson. Also in attendance were: Name Address Representing Melverne Cooke 38 Grand Avenue Cedar Knolls, NJ Self William J. McKelvey Liberty Historic Railway, Inc. Robert Hooper 4 Carriage Hill Drive Long Valley, NJ North Jersey ERHS Jack May 135 Montclair Ave., Montclair, NJ Liberty Historic Railway, Inc. SALUTE TO THE FLAG President Cass-Schmidt led those present in the salute to the flag. President Cass-Schmidt introduced Director of Park Planning & Development Chaplick, who then introduced the new Engineer, Mr. Jim Hutzelmann, Jim is coming to the Park Commission from the Highlands Council, where he spent the last 10 years of his career. Manager of Engineering Hutzelmann then spoke to the Park Commission and explained that while at the Highlands Commission, he was the Senior Engineer, and worked with primarily water resources and also project review. Prior to that he was employed with NRCS doing conservation programs throughout northern New Jersey. Prior to that he was a consultant doing waste water and storm water management. Executive Director Helmer explained that over the last number of months there had been discussions at the Recreational Trails Committee meeting about an initiative to restore and rehabilitate an old trolley line that used to run through the area that is now part of the West Morris Greenway at Hugh Force Park. Staff has had meetings with representatives of the United Railroad Historical Society, Liberty Historic Railway and the Borough of Wharton. Many of us are well aware that Wharton has done a fabulous job in obtaining not only historic preservation money at the state and county level but also state transportation money to really bring back a gorgeous piece of the Morris Canal and the lock tenders area in Wharton. We know working with Wharton on a number of events specifically Wharton Canal Day, the types of visitation that very small area in Wharton is receiving, as part of their annual program. When Mr. Bill McKelvey and his group came to the Park Commission not only did they bring ideas but energy and as will be discussed materials and equipment and a vast knowledge on how this project really can come to fruition. The project will need the Park Commission’s assistance in acquiring two easements along the former rail line that are held by a local Wharton/Roxbury business. Mr. McKelvey is here today to provide a presentation that he has shown to Executive Director Helmer and the Borough of Wharton. An aerial map of the area will be shown at the end of the presentation. Part of the discussion is related to land that the Commission has acquired along the West Morris Greenway which was part of the former Trolley Line. Mr. McEelvey pass out some information that they had actually put together for the Borough of Wharton, and their main goal is to speak to the Morris County Park Commission to seek permission to proceed with their project. Mr. McKelvey explained that the Wharton area is filled with railroads and phenomenal transportation history as outlined in the information passed out. They have also added to this packet information about the Trolley line that came up from Morristown and went to Lake Hopatcong and also a branch that went up to Wharton. Also in the illustration, there is marked out the Right of Way of the former Jersey Central Railroad of New Jersey that went up to Mount Hope Mine. Also indicated is Hopatcong Junction and the actual road bed that is available goes all the way over to Chester Junction or Lake Junction where it connects with the freight lines of Morris County and New Jersey Transit. The Trolley Right-of-Way parallels the water section of Morris Canal in Hugh Force County Park. Mr. McElvey further explained that the lock is actually 75 to 80 percent restored and they intend to restore it to be operational, so that eventually they will be able to have a boat that operates in that section of canal and goes through the lock and up into the basin above it. Mr. McElvey’s presentation illustrated that on the hillside is the right-of-way of Jersey Central. Mr. McElvey had two models of the trollies that they would like to use. The Jersey Central power line right of way is located in the center of this is the restored lock and on the right hand side would be the one trolley which would be the newer trolley which is approximately sixty-five years’ old that is located in Boonton, being restored. The other model is the older 1917 vintage trolley cars of which the North Jersey Electric Railway Historical Society and they have two of those trollies and they have two of the newer ones as well. Mr. McElvey’s presentation contained many pictures of the trolleys and information regarding the restoration process of them. He showed pictures of the car barn that they propose be on the Right of Way they would locate it behind trees, he showed pictures of the barn photo shopped in to the Right of Way. The people in Wharton were concerned that this building would over whelm the park, but it is camouflaged. The letters on it Central Railroad of New Jersey they have they are cast iron letters about 2 feet high and they weigh about 35 to 40 lbs. apiece. They were rescued from the Central Railroad of New Jersey locomotive shop located in Elizabeth before it was demolished. The right of way is two tracks wide so that there is room for the path to continue almost the entire length of the trolley line. Mr. McElvey continued to show the Commission several pictures and illustrations of the area from many different angles. He also made several references of the parking lot and the views from there. Mr. McElvey continued to explain what was contained in their information packet, which contained photographs, and letters of support from various railroad organizations in New Jersey. Along with those letters of support there was also a letter from the Canal Society of New Jersey, which is in favor of this project, and several brochures. Executive Director Helmer then showed the Commission views of the parcels of land that we are working on, with various renderings, and phases of the project. He explained that there are couple of parcels of land that it would be necessary to make the extension of the line two of them are owned by County Concrete, a former Commissioner of ours is willing to take this presentation to the owner of the property and we have had some good luck with him in the past on some other projects, to obtain an easement to be able to connect the trolley line. Another section is owned by New Jersey Transit and so that should be an easier run, and we will have to develop a relationship as well. We are also going to take another look at some of the other parcels, one is coming up as unknown and the other is coming up as County Concrete. Executive Director Helmer explained that for the Land Acquisition Committee when Bill was referring to the house near the Trolley Court, this was the piece of property that we acquired a few years ago in Wharton and this is the area that the Trolley Court would actually erected. The next step would be for the Park Commission if it is united directly to enter into a Memorandum of Agreement to allow this partnership to occur and to allow to begin the process moving forward.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Signers of the United States Declaration of Independence Table of Contents
    SIGNERS OF THE UNITED STATES DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE 56 Men Who Risked It All Life, Family, Fortune, Health, Future Compiled by Bob Hampton First Edition - 2014 1 SIGNERS OF THE UNITED STATES DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTON Page Table of Contents………………………………………………………………...………………2 Overview………………………………………………………………………………...………..5 Painting by John Trumbull……………………………………………………………………...7 Summary of Aftermath……………………………………………….………………...……….8 Independence Day Quiz…………………………………………………….……...………...…11 NEW HAMPSHIRE Josiah Bartlett………………………………………………………………………………..…12 William Whipple..........................................................................................................................15 Matthew Thornton……………………………………………………………………...…........18 MASSACHUSETTS Samuel Adams………………………………………………………………………………..…21 John Adams………………………………………………………………………………..……25 John Hancock………………………………………………………………………………..….29 Robert Treat Paine………………………………………………………………………….….32 Elbridge Gerry……………………………………………………………………....…….……35 RHODE ISLAND Stephen Hopkins………………………………………………………………………….…….38 William Ellery……………………………………………………………………………….….41 CONNECTICUT Roger Sherman…………………………………………………………………………..……...45 Samuel Huntington…………………………………………………………………….……….48 William Williams……………………………………………………………………………….51 Oliver Wolcott…………………………………………………………………………….…….54 NEW YORK William Floyd………………………………………………………………………….………..57 Philip Livingston…………………………………………………………………………….….60 Francis Lewis…………………………………………………………………………....…..…..64 Lewis Morris………………………………………………………………………………….…67
    [Show full text]
  • The Governors of New Jersey' Michael J
    History Faculty Publications History Summer 2015 Governing New Jersey: Reflections on the Publication of a Revised and Expanded Edition of 'The Governors of New Jersey' Michael J. Birkner Gettysburg College Follow this and additional works at: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/histfac Part of the American Politics Commons, Political History Commons, and the United States History Commons Share feedback about the accessibility of this item. Birkner, Michael J. "Governing New Jersey: Reflections on the Publication of a Revised and Expanded Edition of 'The Governors of New Jersey.'" New Jersey Studies 1.1 (Summer 2015), 1-17. This is the publisher's version of the work. This publication appears in Gettysburg College's institutional repository by permission of the copyright owner for personal use, not for redistribution. Cupola permanent link: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/histfac/57 This open access article is brought to you by The uC pola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of The uC pola. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Governing New Jersey: Reflections on the Publication of a Revised and Expanded Edition of 'The Governors of New Jersey' Abstract New Jersey’s chief executive enjoys more authority than any but a handful of governors in the United States. Historically speaking, however, New Jersey’s governors exercised less influence than met the eye. In the colonial period few proprietary or royal governors were able to make policy in the face of combative assemblies. The Revolutionary generation’s hostility to executive power contributed to a weak governor system that carried over into the 19th and 20th centuries, until the Constitution was thoroughly revised in 1947.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom of the Press: Croswell's Case
    Fordham Law Review Volume 33 Issue 3 Article 3 1965 Freedom of the Press: Croswell's Case Morris D. Forkosch Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Morris D. Forkosch, Freedom of the Press: Croswell's Case, 33 Fordham L. Rev. 415 (1965). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol33/iss3/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Law Review by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Freedom of the Press: Croswell's Case Cover Page Footnote The instant study was initiated by Professor Vincent C. Hopkins, S.J., of the Department of History, Fordham University, during 1963. In the spring of 1964 be died, leaving an incomplete draft; completion necessitated research, correction, and re-writing almost entirely, to the point where it became an entirly new paper, and the manuscript was ready for printing when the first olumev of Professor Goebel's, The Law Practice of Alexander Hamilton (1964), appeared. At pages 775-SO6 Goebel gives the background of the Croswell case and, because of many details and references there appearing, the present article has been slimmed down considerably. However, the point of view adopted by Goebel is to give the background so that Hamilton's participation and argument can be understood. The purpose of the present article is to disclose the place occupied by this case (and its participants) in the stream of American libertarian principles, and ezpzdally those legal concepts which prevented freedom of the press from becoming an everyday actuality until the legislatures changed the common law.
    [Show full text]
  • 182 May 2011 New Jersey Civil War Covers at NOJEX!
    NJPH The Journal of the NEW JERSEY POSTAL HISTORY SOCIETY ISSN: 1078-1625 Vol. 39 No. 2 Whole Number 182 May 2011 New Jersey Civil War Covers at NOJEX! One of many Civil War covers from New Jersey being shown at NOJEX in the Court of Honor, this one from Bloomsbury, NJ to West Liberty, Ohio. For more information see page 62, and visit our Featured Cover page at www.NJPostalHistory.org. ~ CONTENTS ~ President’s Message ................................................................................ Robert G. Rose.........60 Annual NJPHS Meeting and NOJEX! ..................................................... ..................................61 New Jersey Civil War Covers .................................................................. Richard Micchelli.....62 Clover Hill Fancy Cancel........................................................................ Jim Walker ...............66 A New (Old) Postmark And Travelogue.................................................. Robert Livingstone...67 Fair View Straightline Handstamp: Is It a New Jersey Postmark? .......... Robert G. Rose.........76 Census of Early New Jersey Covers, Part I.............................................. Ed & Jean Siskin ......80 Additions to the Southard Letters: Mike Yannotta .................................. Mike Yannotta & With Historical Notes by.......................................................... Jean Walton........88 Development of Morris County Post: Part III.......................................... Don Chafetz ...........104 Hometown Post Offices:
    [Show full text]
  • The Trial of John Peter Zenger
    The Trial of John Peter Zenger Should someone be prosecuted for criticizing a government official even if the words are true? Should a judge or a jury decide the case? These were the key issues in the trial of John Peter Zenger. English kings had long controlled the press. King Henry VIII required all writing be licensed before it could be printed. The king prosecuted authors and printers who published unlicensed writing. A powerful royal council known as the Star Chamber controlled the licensing of printed works. The Star Chamber also created a crime called libel. “Seditious libel” was the most serious kind of libel. This outlawed insulting the government, its laws, and officials. Kings and parliaments wanted people to respect them. The Star Chamber ruled that the truth of printed words did not matter. Truth was not a defense in libel cases. In fact, the Star Chamber saw true statements that libeled the government as more dangerous than false ones. People would more easily dismiss false statements. The most famous trial lawyer in the American colonies, Parliament got rid of the Star Chamber Andrew Hamilton addressed the court. He was in 1642, and the last licensing laws defending publisher Peter Zenger against the criminal expired by 1695. But courts continued charge of seditious libel. (New York State Library) to enforce the Star Chamber libel laws. Judges decided whether printed words were libelous. Juries decided only if a defendant had published the words in question. By 1700, “freedom of the press” in England only meant no government licensing. Once authors and printers had published their writing, English officials could still charge them with seditious libel.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Hunter Morris and the Politics of Indian Affairs in Pennsylvania, 1754-1755
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1995 Robert Hunter Morris and the Politics of Indian Affairs in Pennsylvania, 1754-1755 Charles Michael Downing College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Indigenous Studies Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Downing, Charles Michael, "Robert Hunter Morris and the Politics of Indian Affairs in Pennsylvania, 1754-1755" (1995). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539626005. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-y2wn-7396 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ROBERT HUNTER MORRIS AND THE POLITICS OF INDIAN AFFAIRS IN PENNSYLVANIA, 1754-1755 A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Charles Michael Downing 1995 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Author Approved, August 1995 A xm JUL James Axtell bhn E. Si James P. Whittenbui TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Section 3. County Profile
    Section 3: County Profile SECTION 3. COUNTY PROFILE This profile describes the general information of the County (physical setting, population and demographics, general building stock, and land use and population trends) and critical facilities located within Morris County. In Section 3, specific profile information is presented and analyzed to develop an understanding of the study area, including the economic, structural, and population assets at risk and the particular concerns that may be present related to hazards analyzed (for example, a high percentage of vulnerable persons in an area). 2020 HMP Changes The “County Profile” is now located in Section 3; previously located in Section 4. It contains updated information regarding the County's physical setting, population and demographics and trends, general building stock, land use and trends, potential new development and critical facilities. This includes U.S. Census ACS 2017 data and additional information regarding the New Jersey Highlands Region in the Development Trends/Future Development subsection. Critical facilities identified as community lifelines using FEMA’s lifeline definition and seven categories were added to the inventory and described in this section. 3.1 GENERAL INFORMATION Morris County is one of the fastest growing counties in the New York-New Jersey-Connecticut metropolitan region. It is located amid rolling hills, broad valleys, and lakes approximately 30 miles northwest of New York City. The County was created by an Act of the State Legislature on March 15, 1738, separating it from Hunterdon County. Morris County was named after Colonel Lewis Morris, then Governor of the Province of New Jersey (the area that now includes Morris, Sussex, and Warren Counties).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Jury's Constitutional Role, Originalism, and Judicial
    The Jury's Constitutional Role, Originalism, and Judicial Usurpation © by Tom Glass* I. Introduction.......................................................................................................................... 3 II. The Originalist Method ....................................................................................................... 4 III. The Evidence of Support for Jury Power by the Founders ............................................. 7 A. The Political and Intellectual Atmosphere of the Founding Era........................................... 7 1. Liberty and Justice for All ................................................................................................. 7 2. Natural Law Concepts Underlie Jury Power ..................................................................... 8 B. Defining The Jury ............................................................................................................... 15 C. The History of the Jury as the Founders Knew It ............................................................... 19 1. John Lilburne – Father of Most Criminal Procedural Rights .......................................... 19 2. William Penn, William Mead, and Bushell’s Case.......................................................... 22 3. The Restoration, the Seven Bishops’ Case, and the Glorious Revolution ....................... 27 4. Zenger’s Case – Press Freedom Protected by a Law-Judging Jury................................. 31 5. The Battle over Libel in Eighteenth Century England....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Roadsides in New Jersey
    Presented to the Rxngwood Public Library FOR REFERENCE SE? 2 8 199! NOT TO BE TAKEN FROM THE ROOM CAT. NO. 23J RINGWOOD PUBLIC LIBRARY, NJ 3 6047 09044956 1 HISTORIC ROADSIDES if A Condensed Description of the ] I Principal Colonial and Revolu- I tionaryLandmarks in Newjersey, II arranged for the Convenience of K^ Students and Motorists. The Society of Colonial Wars in the State of New Jersey 1928 For Purchase of Copies Address WALTER LESTER GLENNEY, ESQ., Secretary 916 Madison Avenue Plainfield, N. J. Copyright 1928 The Society of Colonial Wars in the Stci tc of New Jersey Press oj Innes & Sons Philadelphia PREFACE N the foreword of "The First Americans" the Editors say, "The beginning of the thirteen English Colonies, so big I with destiny, have stirred the reverent curiosity of Ameri' can historians generation after generation." It is one of the ob' jects of the Society of Colonial Wars to promote an interest in and knowledge of Colonial history, not only by historians but by the ordinary man who professes that he has no time to devote to things that are past. In this day when distance is made unimportant by the motor vehicle, and we can in a day cover a mileage, which would have taken many days in Colonial times, there is no excuse for unfamiliarity or lack of knowledge of the historic spots in one's own State. When the State is one with a his- tory so fascinating and so closely connected with our National history, there is even less excuse for ignorance.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes and Documents
    NOTES AND DOCUMENTS *An ^American in J^ondony 1735—1736 II EDITED BY BEVERLY MCANEAR Saturdayy July 26} 1735. I rosse Early and wrote till 2, when I dined. My father read the persian letters.84 After dinner one Kerr85 came to wait on my father with letters from Capt. Pearse, with whom He came from Virginia. Captn. Pearse was stoped at Portsmouth] by Adll. Cavindish86 and Had Sent my fathers letters and papers up by Ker. He left New York the 22 of June, and all the family well. We read over our letters and the papers that came with them. I dress'd and went to Capt. Tubly, who was walking on the Bishops Walk. I told Him of the arrivall of Capt. Pearse, with whom Young Grey is, who the Capt. designs for his daughter. I walked with Him till past 7 oClock, when we went to the Club. Comissary Cullif ord being there, we Had some discourse about the Cheapness of arms made at Brum- idgham, where, the Comissary told us, he was offerred Cutlases to all appearance as good as those used in the queens ware at sea for two Shillings a piece and guns for 7 pound a score, but the guns he believed to be good for little. I stayed till Capt. Man and Doctor Smart came, when, taking my lieve, I walked some time with Miss Balcion and, coming Home, went to bed. Sundayy July 27y 1735.1 rosse Early and, Having read in the per- sian letters till 11,1 dress'd, as did my father.
    [Show full text]
  • The Signers of the Declaration of Independence
    The Declaration of Independence: About the Signers (Continued) The Signers of the Declaration of Independence All of the colonies were represented in Philadelphia to consider the delicate case for independence and to change the course of the war. In all, there were fifty-six representatives from the thirteen colonies. Fourteen represented the New England Colonies, twenty-one represented the Middle Colonies and twenty-one represented the South- ern Colonies. The largest number (9) came from Pennsylvania. Most of the signers were American born although eight were foreign born. The ages of the signers ranged from 26 (Edward Rutledge) to 70 (Benjamin Franklin), but the majority of the signers were in their thirties or forties. More than half of the signers were lawyers and the others were planters, merchants and shippers. Together they mutually pledged “to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.” They were mostly men of means who had much to lose if the war was lost. None of the sign- ers died at the hands of the British, and one-third served as militia officers during the war. Four of the signers were taken captive during the war and nearly all of them were poorer at the end of the war than at the beginning. No matter what each of these men did after July 1776, the actual signing of the Declaration of Independence which began on August 2 ensured them instant immortality. The following gives a bit of information about each signer AFTER the signing of the Declaration of Independence. Connecticut Samuel Huntington (1731-1796)—Samuel Huntington was a self-made man who distinguished himself in government on the state and national levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Placemen's Progress: the Governors of Provincial New York, 1717Т•Fi1753
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 1974 Placemen's Progress: The Governors of Provincial New York, 1717–1753 Neil Ovadia The Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/3909 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Paga(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, tney are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame.
    [Show full text]