DOCSLIB.ORG

UNITED NATIONS Case No.: IT-95-16-T Date: 14 January 2000

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
UNITED NATIONS Case No.: IT-95-16-T Date: 14 January 2000 UNITED NATIONS International Tribunal for the Case No.: IT-95-16-T Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of Date: 14 January 2000 International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia since 1991 Original: English IN THE TRIAL CHAMBER Before: Judge Antonio Cassese, Presiding Judge Richard May Judge Florence Ndepele Mwachande Mumba Registrar: Mrs. Dorothee de Sampayo Garrido-Nijgh Judgement of: 14 January 2000 PROSECUTOR v. Zoran KUPRE[KI], Mirjan KUPRE[KI], Vlatko KUPRE[KI], Drago JOSIPOVI], Dragan PAPI], Vladimir [ANTI], also known as “VLADO” JUDGEMENT The Office of the Prosecutor: Mr. Franck Terrier Mr. Michael Blaxill Counsel for the Accused: Mr. Ranko Radovi}, Mr. Tomislav Pasari}, for Zoran Kupre{ki} Ms. Jadranka Slokovi}-Gluma}, Ms. Desanka Vranjican, for Mirjan Kupre{ki} Mr. Borislav Krajina, Mr. Želimar Par, for Vlatko Kupre{ki} Mr. Luko [u{ak, Ms. Goranka Herljevic, for Drago Josipovi} Mr. Petar Puli{eli}, Ms. Nika Pinter, for Dragan Papi} Mr. Petar Pavkovi}, Mr. Mirko Vrdoljak, for Vladimir Šanti} Case No.: IT-95-16-T 14 January 2000 i CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................... 2 A. The International Tribunal.........................................................................................................................2 B. Procedural Background...............................................................................................................................2 II. THE CHARGES AGAINST THE ACCUSED........................................................ 10 III. GENERAL BACKGROUND .................................................................................. 13 A. The Origins of the Muslim-Croat Conflict (October 1992 - March 1994)...................................13 1. The Case for the Prosecution .................................................................................................................13 (a) General..................................................................................................................................................13 (b) The Vance-Owen Plan........................................................................................................................14 (c) Croat Nationalism, Militancy and Propaganda..............................................................................16 2. The Case for the Defence........................................................................................................................17 3. Findings of the Trial Chamber...............................................................................................................18 B. The Stages in the Muslim-Croat Conflict..............................................................................................18 1. The Fall of Jajce to the Serbs and the Influx of Muslim and Croat Refugees ...............................18 (a) The Case for the Prosecution............................................................................................................19 (b) The Case for the Defence...................................................................................................................19 (c) Findings of the Trial Chamber..........................................................................................................19 2. Attacks on Bosnian Croats in the La{va River Valley.......................................................................19 (a) The Case for the Prosecution............................................................................................................19 (b) The Case for the Defence...................................................................................................................20 (i) Dusina ..............................................................................................................................................20 (ii) Busovaca.........................................................................................................................................21 (iii) Kidnapping of Zivko Toti} and the Killing of his Bodyguards.............................................21 (iv) Attacks on Croats in Stari Vitez (Mahala).................................................................................21 (v) Attacks on Croats in Zenica.........................................................................................................22 (vi) Croat Propaganda and Preparation for an Attack by Bosnian Muslim Forces....................22 (c) Findings of the Trial Chamber..........................................................................................................23 C. Muslim-Croat Relations in Central Bosnia ..........................................................................................24 1. The Case for the Prosecution .................................................................................................................24 (a) Good Muslim-Croat Relations before October 1992....................................................................24 (b) Deterioration in Relations after October 1992 and the Separation of the Village Guards.....25 2. The Case for the Defence........................................................................................................................26 3. Findings of the Trial Chamber...............................................................................................................27 D. Persecution – Alleged Facts......................................................................................................................27 1. The Case for the Prosecution .................................................................................................................27 (a) General..................................................................................................................................................27 (b) Discriminatory Acts from October 1992 until April 1993...........................................................28 2. The Case for the Defence........................................................................................................................33 (a) General..................................................................................................................................................33 (b) Croat Nationalism...............................................................................................................................33 (c) Muslim Nationalism and Persecution of Croats ............................................................................35 (d) Absence of an Official Plan or Policy on the Part of the Bosnian Croat Political and Military Institutions to Persecute Muslims.....................................................................................36 Case No.: IT-95-16-T 14 January 2000 ii (e) Whether the Croatian Community of Herceg-Bosna had a Separatist Agenda........................37 (f) Whether the Bosnian Croat Authorities Condoned Persecution of Muslims by Private Individuals............................................................................................................................................38 (g) Whether State Enterprises Discriminated Against Muslims .......................................................39 (h) Whether Relief Supplies were Distributed Equally to Muslims.................................................40 (i) The Fact that Croat Civilians were also the Victims of Attacks by Bosnian Muslims...........41 3. Findings of the Trial Chamber...............................................................................................................42 E. Governmental and Armed Forces in Bosnia and Herzegovina in 1992-1993.............................43 1. General .......................................................................................................................................................43 2. The Bosnian Croat forces........................................................................................................................44 (a) The Bosnian Croat Leadership in Vitez..........................................................................................44 (b) The HVO and the Vitez Brigade ......................................................................................................44 (c) Croatian Paramilitary Formations....................................................................................................45 (d) The Military Police and “The Jokers”.............................................................................................46 3. The Bosnian Muslim Forces...................................................................................................................48 (a) The Army of Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH army).......................................................................48 (b) Muslim Paramilitary Formations......................................................................................................49 (c) Mobilisation of Muslims....................................................................................................................49 (d) The Territorial Defence......................................................................................................................49 (e) Bosnian Muslim Roadblocks and Checkpoints .............................................................................50
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Amended Indictment
    THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA CASE NO. IT-95-14/2 THE PROSECUTOR v. Dario KORDIC Mario CERKEZ AMENDED INDICTMENT The Prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, pursuant to her authority under Article 18 of the Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia ("The Statute of the Tribunal"), charges: Dario KORDIC Mario CERKEZ with Crimes Against Humanity, Grave Breaches of the Geneva Conventions and Violations of the Laws or Customs of War. BACKGROUND 1. The events alleged in this indictment took place against the background of the break-up of the former Yugoslavia. The Republic of Croatia declared its independence on 25 June 1991, the implementation of which was suspended until 8 October 1991. The Republic of Croatia was recognized by the European Community on 15 January 1992, and admitted by the United Nations as a member State on 22 May 1992. The Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina declared its independence on 3 March 1992, and was recognized by the European Community on 6 April 1992, and admitted by the United Nations as a member State on 22 May 1992. 2. At times relevant to the indictment, the Croatian Democratic Union (the "HDZ") was a principal and influential political party in Croatia. Some of the HDZ’s stated goals were to establish "the sovereignty of the Croatian people" and their "inalienable right to self-determination -- including the right to secession -- of the entire Croatian nation inside its historical and natural borders," and to promote "the economic and spiritual association between .
    [Show full text]
  • The War in Bosnia and Herzegovina Or the Unacceptable Lightness of “Historicism”
    The War in Bosnia and Herzegovina Or the Unacceptable Lightness of “Historicism” Davor Marijan War Museum, Zagreb, Republic of Croatia Abstract The author in this study does not intend to provide a comprehensive account of the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina, in part because the cur- rent level of research does not enable this. The only way to understand this conflict is through facts, not prejudices. However, such prejudices are particularly acute amongst Muslim-Bosniac authors. They base their claims on the notion that Serbs and Croats are the destroyers of Bosnia and Herzegovina, and that both are equally culpable in its destruction. Relying on mainly unpublished and uncited documents from the three constitutive nations of Bosnia and Herzegovina, the author factually chal- lenges basic and generally accepted claims. The author offers alternative responses to certain claims and draws attention to the complexity of the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina, which has been mainly viewed in terms of black or white. The author does, however, suggest that in considering the character of the war it is necessary to examine first the war in Croatia and the inter-relationship between the two. The main focus is on 1992 and the Muslim and Croat differences that developed into open conflict at the beginning of 1993. The role of the international community in the war and the partition of Bosnia and Herzegovina are also discussed. At the end of the 20th century in Europe and the eclipse of Communism from the world political scene, it is not easy to trace the indelible marks left behind after the collapse of Yugoslavia and the wars that ensued.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuzla Is a City in the Northeastern Part of Bosnia and Herzegovina. It Is the Seat of the Tuzla Canton and Is the Econo
    Summary: Tuzla is a city in the northeastern part of Bosnia and Herzegovina. It is the seat of the Tuzla Canton and is the economic, scientific, cultural, educational, health and tourist centre of northeast Bosnia. Preliminary results from the 2013 Census indicate that the municipality has a population of 120,441. District Heating System of Tuzla City started in October 1983. Project to supply Tuzla City with heat energy from Tuzla Power Plant that will have combined production of electricity and heat was happened in 4 phases. The requirements for connection to Tuzla District Heating brought of system in position that in 2005 we got to the maximum capacity and we had to do wide modernization of network pipes and heat substations. Facts about the Tuzla district energy system Annual heat carrying capacity: 300,000 MWth Temperature: 130–60°C Transmission network length: 19.6 km (2x9.8 km) Distribution network length: 142.4 km (2x71.2 km) Power station fuel: Coal Number of users: Total: 22934 Flats snd Houses: 20979 Public Institutions: 156 Commercial units: 1799 Heated area (square meters): Total: 1718787 Flats and Houses: 1158402 Public Institutions: 220460 Commercial units: 339925 Results achieved by reengineering the Tuzla district energy system • 30 % energy savings compared to old system before retrofit • Capacity expanded by 36 % within the existing flow of 2,300 m3/h • Reengineering of 98 substations: ball valves, strainers, pressure regulators, control valves, temperature and pressure sensors, safety thermostats, weather stations, electronic controllers, thermostatic radiator valves (TRVs), energy meters Tuzla is a city in Bosnia and Herzegovina. It is the seat of the Tuzla Canton and is the economic, scientific, cultural, educational, health and tourist centre of northeast Bosnia.
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina Joint Opinion on the Legal
    Strasbourg, Warsaw, 9 December 2019 CDL-AD(2019)026 Opinion No. 951/2019 Or. Engl. ODIHR Opinion Nr.:FoA-BiH/360/2019 EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) OSCE OFFICE FOR DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS AND HUMAN RIGHTS (OSCE/ODIHR) BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA JOINT OPINION ON THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK GOVERNING THE FREEDOM OF PEACEFUL ASSEMBLY IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA, IN ITS TWO ENTITIES AND IN BRČKO DISTRICT Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 121st Plenary Session (Venice, 6-7 December 2019) On the basis of comments by Ms Claire BAZY-MALAURIE (Member, France) Mr Paolo CAROZZA (Member, United States of America) Mr Nicolae ESANU (Substitute member, Moldova) Mr Jean-Claude SCHOLSEM (substitute member, Belgium) This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int CDL-AD(2019)026 - 2 - Table of Contents I. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 3 II. Background and Scope of the Opinion ...................................................................... 4 III. International Standards .............................................................................................. 5 IV. Legal context and legislative competence .................................................................. 6 V. Analysis ..................................................................................................................... 8 A. Definitions of public assembly ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Kiseljak Kiseljak Fojnica Kiseljak Fojnica Ana Duno B
    BOSNA I HERCEGOVINA FEDERACIJA BOSNE I HERCEGOVINE KANTON SREDIŠNJA BOSNA / SREDNJOBOSANSKI KANTON TRAVNIK MINISTARSTVO OBRAZOVANJA, CENTRAL BOSNIA CANTON ZNANOSTI, MLADIH, KULTURE I SCIENCE, MINISTRY OF EDUCATION, ŠPORTA YOUTH, CULTURE AND SPORTS MINISTARSTVO OBRAZOVANJA, NAUKE, MLADIH, KULTURE I SPORTA Travnik, Stanična 43., Tel./faks.: 030/511-214, 030/518-675, www.mozks-ksb.ba, e-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Ispitno mjesto KISELJAK sve grupe Spisak kandidata koji su planirani za ispit 06.6.2020. Vrijeme početka ispita iz PPP u : 9:00 ;12:30 a) iz poznavanja pružanja prve pomoći (PPP) b) iz poznavanja propisa o sigurnosti prometa (PPS) Vrijeme početka ispita iz PPS u : 10.30 , 14:00 POLAŽE ISPIT IZ: Red. Kategorija / OSPOSOBLJAVANJE IZ PRUŽANJA PRVE OSPOSOBLJAVANJE IZ POZNAVANJA broj IME I PREZIME KANDIDATA Potkateg. POMOĆI (CRVENI KRIŽ) PROPISA(AUTOŠKOLA) PPP PPS 1 ADNA FAZLIHODŽIĆ B 12:30 14:00 KISELJAK MT MICE 2 ADRIANA DRLJEPAN B 12:30 14:00 KISELJAK MT MICE 3 AHMED BUREKOVIĆ C1 12:30 14:00 FOJNICA KOMPAS 4 ALDINA FAZLIHODŽIĆ B 12:30 14:00 KISELJAK KOMPAS 5 AMILA MRAČKIĆ B 12:30 14:00 FOJNICA MT MICE 6 ANA DUNO B 09:00 10:30 KISELJAK MZ TRANSPORT 7 ANDREJ VUJICA C1 09:00 10:30 KISELJAK MZ TRANSPORT 8 DANIJEL ALIMANOVIĆ B 09:00 10:30 KISELJAK MAGNUM 9 DAVID RAŠO B 09:00 10:30 KISELJAK MZ TRANSPORT 10 DOMINIK TUKA B 12:30 14:00 FOJNICA KOMPAS 11 DŽENIS FEJZIĆ C1 12:30 14:00 FOJNICA KOMPAS 12 EDIN PANDŽIĆ B 09:00 10:30 KISELJAK MAGNUM 13 ESMA KLISURA B 12:30 14:00 FOJNICA KOMPAS 14 FEHRAT MUJAKIĆ C1 09:00 10:30
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina in Figures 2019
    ISSN 1986-8545 BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA IN FIGURES 2019 Sarajevo, 2020 CONTENTS Publisher: Agency for Statistics of Bosnia and Herzegovina Zelenih beretki 26 Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina TERRITORY 5 www.bhas.gov.ba POPULATION 7-14 SOCIAL WELFARE 16-22 Person responsible: Velimir Jukić, PhD, Director CULTURE AND ART 23-24 EDUCATION 25-31 Tables and graphs Agency for Statistics prepared by: of Bosnia and Herzegovina SCIENCE, TEHNOLOGY AND RESEARCH 32-33 LABOUR MARKET 34-42 Proofread by: International Cooperation and European ECONOMY 43-48 Integration Department — Agency for GROSS FIXED CAPITAL FORMATION 49 Statistics of Bosnia and Herzegovina STATISTICS OF GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS 50-53 DEBT STATISTICS OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 54-55 Cover design: Lejla Rakić Bekić STRUCTURAL BUSINESS STATISTICS 56-62 Pre-press: Larisa Hasanbegović STATISTICAL BUSINESS REGISTER 63-64 PRICES 65-71 INDUSTRY 72-79 FOREIGN TRADE STATISTICS 80-81 TRADE AND OTHER SERVICES 82-90 CONSTRUCTION 91-95 TRANSPORT 96-100 TELECOMMUNICATIONS 101-103 POSTAL SERVICES 104-106 INFORMATION-COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES 107-109 ENERGY 110-112 ENVIRONMENT 113-115 AGRICULTURE 116-119 FORESTRY 120-122 Statistical data sources for the "BiH in figures 2019" are: TOURISM 123-125 - Statistical institutions of Bosnia and Herzegovina: Agency for Statistics of BiH, Institute for Statistics of FBiH and the Institute for Statistics of RS CRIME 126-129 - Central Bank of Bosnia and Herzegovina - Administrative sources: Indirect Taxation Authority of BiH TERRITORY BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA Form of government State Capital Sarajevo Surface area (km2) 51.209,2 Coastline (km) 21,2 Highest mountain - Maglić (m) 2.386 Longest river - Drina (km) 346 Main lake - Buško (km2) 55,8 Border countries Croatia, Serbia, Montenegro Estimated resident 3.500,295 population (1/1/2018) Population density 68 (inhab/km2) Official languages Bosnian, Serbian, Croatian Alphabets Latin, Cyrillic Official currency Convertibile mark (KM) Climate Moderate continental and mediterranean 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Europe in Crisis: Class 5 – the Rise of Fascism
    Lecture Notes Europe in Crisis: Class 5 – The Rise of Fascism Slide 2 Postwar European Economies: • After the war, Europe suffered great economic problems. These problems varied from country to country. All countries had taken out loans to fight the war, and were trying to figure out how to pay those back. o England: Used to be a manufacturing powerhouse. Now, had lost many of its markets to foreign competitors like Japan and the US. Also, in 1914, England had risked falling behind Germany and the US technologically. This problem was exacerbated by a war that left Britain poor and the US rich. Economy falters, during the interwar period, Britain has a steady unemployment rate of about 10%. o France: Had taken out more loans than anyone else. Also, had to rebuild about a quarter of their country. Relied on German reparation payments for all this. Most people have work, though, because of jobs created by rebuilding. In 1923, when Germany defaults on reparations, France invades the Ruhr, and collects the profits from the coal mines here. An agreement is reached in 1924 with the Dawes Plan – American bankers promise to invest in Germany, thus boosting its economy, if France leaves the Ruhr, reduces reparations and agrees to a two-year moratorium. o Germany: Was reeling after the war, and had trouble getting its economy back on track. Problems were exacerbated when France invaded the Ruhr in 1923. Germany responded by encouraging workers to strike. Meanwhile, they kept printing money, trying to come up with a way to pay the French.
    [Show full text]
  • SS-Totenkopfverbände from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia (Redirected from SS-Totenkopfverbande)
    Create account Log in Article Talk Read Edit View history SS-Totenkopfverbände From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (Redirected from SS-Totenkopfverbande) Navigation Not to be confused with 3rd SS Division Totenkopf, the Waffen-SS fighting unit. Main page This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. No cleanup reason Contents has been specified. Please help improve this article if you can. (December 2010) Featured content Current events This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding Random article citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (September 2010) Donate to Wikipedia [2] SS-Totenkopfverbände (SS-TV), rendered in English as "Death's-Head Units" (literally SS-TV meaning "Skull Units"), was the SS organization responsible for administering the Nazi SS-Totenkopfverbände Interaction concentration camps for the Third Reich. Help The SS-TV was an independent unit within the SS with its own ranks and command About Wikipedia structure. It ran the camps throughout Germany, such as Dachau, Bergen-Belsen and Community portal Buchenwald; in Nazi-occupied Europe, it ran Auschwitz in German occupied Poland and Recent changes Mauthausen in Austria as well as numerous other concentration and death camps. The Contact Wikipedia death camps' primary function was genocide and included Treblinka, Bełżec extermination camp and Sobibor. It was responsible for facilitating what was called the Final Solution, Totenkopf (Death's head) collar insignia, 13th Standarte known since as the Holocaust, in collaboration with the Reich Main Security Office[3] and the Toolbox of the SS-Totenkopfverbände SS Economic and Administrative Main Office or WVHA.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright by Ashley N. Mack 2013
    Copyright by Ashley N. Mack 2013 The Dissertation Committee for Ashley N. Mack Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: DISCIPLINING MOMMY: RHETORICS OF REPRODUCTION IN CONTEMPORARY MATERNITY CULTURE Committee: Dana L. Cloud, Supervisor Joshua Gunn Barry Brummett Sharon J. Hardesty Christine Williams DISCIPLINING MOMMY: RHETORICS OF REPRODUCTION IN CONTEMPORARY MATERNITY CULTURE by Ashley N. Mack, B.A.; B.A.; M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin August, 2013 Dedication To Tiffany—for being an awesome lady, thinker, worker, “true” sister, daughter, and mother. Acknowledgements My family has something of a “curse”: Multiple generations of women have been single, working mothers. Therefore, the social pressures, expectations and norms of motherhood have always permeated my experiences of reproduction and labor. Everything I do has been built on the backs of the women in my family—so it is important that I thank them first and foremost. I would be remised if I did not also specifically thank my big sister, Tiffany, for sharing her experiences as a mother with me. Hearing her stories inspired me to look closer at rhetorics of maternity and this project would not exist if she were not brave enough to speak up about issues that produce shame and fear for many moms. Dana Cloud, my advisor, is a shining light at the end of the many dark tunnels that academic work can produce.
    [Show full text]
  • Beitrag Zur Flora Von Bosnien Und Der Hercegovina
    419 Bei der niheren Untersuchung der Bliithen nach Anzahl der einzelnen Bestandtheile machb ich mehrfache Beobachtungen, die mir werth erseheinen, vereffenflicht zu werden. Ich erlaube mir nun die versehiedenen Bildungen der Ktirze halber in naehsbhender Tabelle zusammenzusbllen. Zahl der Perigonblitter Fall Zahl tier Zahl der Zahl der Exemplare iussere innere Staubgefisse Narben 22 4 8 2. 1 & 3 9 2 9 4. 1 10 5. t 5 8 6. 1 5 9 1 5 t0 8. 3 5 5 t0 9. & 5 4 tO Bei Individuen mit ftinf Nar ben war auch der Fruehtknobn fiinfficherig. Im zweibn Fall hatte die Bltithe nut drei innero entwiekelte ]Derigenblitbr, das vierte war verkiimmert und nur 2 Mm. lang. Aueh waren zwei Staubgefisso an den Staubfiden etwa bis zur ttilfb verwaehsen. Beim vierbn Fall waren aber zwei Staubgefasse der ganzen Lingo der Staubfaden nach, die Aniheren nur zum Theil verwachsen. Schliesslich bemerke ich noch, dass ich den gr0ssbn Theil (32 Exemplare) der ftinfblatbrigen Einbeere etwa in der EniGfernung 'yon humeri Schri~ten sammelb und dass diese vielleicht ein Vierbl dot normal entwickelbn Individuen ausmaeh~. Sachsenfeld in Unbrsbiermark, im October 1888. Beitrag zur Flora von Bosnien und der Heroegovina. Von Dr. Ed. Form~nek, k. k. Professor am behmischen Gymnasium in Br~nn. (Fortsetzung.) Thalictrum angustifolium L. see. Jacq. Herr. bet. u III, pag. 25 -- angustissimum Crantz. Um Sarajevo hie und da, im Zujevina- thale, bei Pale etc. vide B. F1. pag. 67 (Beck), Otoka, Krupa, Zalin, Ha~ani, Podvida~a, Star. majdan, Brdari, Pobre~je, Sanski most, Stra~inska, Bronzeni majdan, Brankovae, Banjaluka, Magier, Rujevica,.
    [Show full text]
  • ICC-ASP/11/18 Assembly of States Parties
    International Criminal Court ICC-ASP/11/18 Distr.: General Assembly of States Parties 9 November 2012 Original: English Eleventh session The Hague, 14-22 November 2012 Designation of the members of the Advisory Committee on Nominations Note by the Secretariat By resolution ICC-ASP/9/Res.5,1 the Assembly welcomed the report2 adopted by the Bureau pursuant to paragraph 25 of resolution ICC-ASP/9/Res.3 and adopted the recommendations contained therein. It also requested the Bureau to start the process of preparing the election, by the Assembly of States Parties, of the members of the Advisory Committee on nominations of judges of the International Criminal Court in accordance with the terms of reference of the Advisory Committee. Article 36, paragraph 4 (c), of the Rome Statute provides as follows: “(c) The Assembly of States Parties may decide to establish, if appropriate, an Advisory Committee on nominations. In that event, the Committee’s composition and mandate shall be established by the Assembly of States Parties.” The terms of reference of the Advisory Committee on Nominations provide that: “The Committee should be composed of nine members, nationals of States Parties, designated by the Assembly of States Parties by consensus on recommendation made by the Bureau of the Assembly also made by consensus, reflecting the principal legal systems of the world and an equitable geographical representation, as well as a fair representation of both genders, based on the number of States Parties to the Rome Statute.”3 At its 11th meeting, on 1 May 2012, the Bureau fixed the nomination period to run for 12 weeks, from 16 May to 8 August 2012 (Central European Time).
    [Show full text]
  • Transnational Neo-Nazism in the Usa, United Kingdom and Australia
    TRANSNATIONAL NEO-NAZISM IN THE USA, UNITED KINGDOM AND AUSTRALIA PAUL JACKSON February 2020 JACKSON | PROGRAM ON EXTREMISM About the Program on About the Author Extremism Dr Paul Jackson is a historian of twentieth century and contemporary history, and his main teaching The Program on Extremism at George and research interests focus on understanding the Washington University provides impact of radical and extreme ideologies on wider analysis on issues related to violent and societies. Dr. Jackson’s research currently focuses non-violent extremism. The Program on the dynamics of neo-Nazi, and other, extreme spearheads innovative and thoughtful right ideologies, in Britain and Europe in the post- academic inquiry, producing empirical war period. He is also interested in researching the work that strengthens extremism longer history of radical ideologies and cultures in research as a distinct field of study. The Britain too, especially those linked in some way to Program aims to develop pragmatic the extreme right. policy solutions that resonate with Dr. Jackson’s teaching engages with wider themes policymakers, civic leaders, and the related to the history of fascism, genocide, general public. totalitarian politics and revolutionary ideologies. Dr. Jackson teaches modules on the Holocaust, as well as the history of Communism and fascism. Dr. Jackson regularly writes for the magazine Searchlight on issues related to contemporary extreme right politics. He is a co-editor of the Wiley- Blackwell journal Religion Compass: Modern Ideologies and Faith. Dr. Jackson is also the Editor of the Bloomsbury book series A Modern History of Politics and Violence. The views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author, and not necessarily those of the Program on Extremism or the George Washington University.
    [Show full text]