Ornithology Lectures 12–14.2019

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ornithology Lectures 12–14.2019 NREM/ZOOL 4464 – Ornithology Lectures 12–14 Dr. Tim O’Connell 11, 13, & 14 February 2019 Modern hierarchy of life on earth: •Domain •OrDer •KingDom •Family •Phylum (plural “phyla”) •Genus (plural “genera”) •Class •Species (plural “species”) •Prokaryotes – no nucleus anD no subcellular organelles. These are exceeDingly tiny 0.1–10 microns Diameter. •Eukaryotes – larger cells (10–100 microns) with DNA containeD in a nucleus anD numerous membrane-bound organelles like mitochondria, Golgi apparatus. Four kingdoms of the Eukarya: •Protista - most unicellular, hetero- or autotrophic •Fungi - multicellular heterotrophs that feeD by or both absorption •Plantae - multicellular, photosynthetic autotrophs •Animalia - multicellular heterotrophs that feeD by ingestion Within Animalia: •Phylum ChorData •Subphylum Vertebrata •Class Aves Paleontologist Phil Currie, commenting on recent fossil finDs in China of Dinosaurs with feathers: "This shows that Dinosaurs are not extinct, but are well-representeD by 10,000 species of birDs." What did he mean? Are bird birds, or are birds really dinosaurs? The issue: •BirDs are obviously allieD with reptiles, anD specifically to Dinosaurs. Ancestry ambiguous, however. •DiD birDs DescenD from ancient reptiles that were NOT Dinosaurs, or DiD birDs DescenD DIRECTLY FROM dinosaurs? •If the latter, then birDs are technically consiDereD Dinosaurs accorDing to a moDern cladistic analysis. That is, dinosaurs did NOT die out at the end of the Cretaceous! Adaptive radiation - process through which one taxon gives rise to many others that exploit available niches. We neeD to go back to the Paleozoic – the rise of the TetrapoDs! ~450 million years ago (MYA), bony fish with cartilaginous rays in their fins appear. ~420 (blaze it!) MYA, some fish Develop fleshy fins with bone anD muscle insiDe, e.g., Coelacanth. ~410 MYA, some “lobe-finneD” fish Develop a structure of one proximal limb bone articulating with two Distal limb bones in each limb. This is the beginning of humerus-raDius/ulna. ~385 MYA, Tiktaalik shows a development of the pectoral girDle sufficient to bear its weight without the buoyancy of water! ~380 MYA, Acanthostega has digits at the enD of its 4 limbs. ~370 MYA, amphibians appear – 5 digits on 4 limbs – these are the ancestral TetrapoDs. KingDom Animalia, Phylum ChorData, (Subphylum Vertebrata), Class Reptilia – aDaptive raDiation of reptiles in the Mesozoic Era, ~ 250–65 mya. 1 From the basal stock of reptiles (cotylosaurs), at least SIX major groups Developed: • Turtles • Eusuchians (ancestral to lizarDs, snakes, anD • Plesiosaurs (long-necked marine reptiles) the tuatara) • Icthyosaurs (Dolphin-shapeD marine • PseuDosuchians (a.k.a. “thecodonts”, so- reptiles) named because their teeth sit in individual • Pelycosaurs (ancestral to the therapsiDs sockets in the jaw). from which we mammals DescenDeD) The pseuDosuchians are ancestral to crocoDilians, pterosaurs (flying reptiles), and the dinosaurs – the group that underwent one of the most dramatic adaptive radiations the world has ever seen. Dino-diversity: The dinosaur radiation led to the development of many wildly different forms. All dinosaurs had their limbs rotateD to support the boDy from beneath – like mammal limbs – rather than splayeD out to the sides as in lizarDs, turtles, anD crocoDilians. Significantly, Dinosaurs radiated into ancestral quaDrapeDal forms anD derived bipeDal forms. The big split in Dino-diversity involves the orientation of the bones in the pelvis: ilium, ischium, and pubis. In the ORNITHISCHIANS, the pubis bone points backwarDs, as it Does in moDern birDs (although as we’ll see, birDs DiDn’t descend from the ornithischians). The ornithischians incluDe such familiar Dinosaurs as Stegosaurus, Ankylosaurus, the ceratopsians like Triceratops, anD the haDrosaurs, i.e., the “Duck-billed dinosaurs” like Trachodon. Iguanodon Stegosaurus 2 Opposite the ornithischians were the SAURISCHIANS, the “lizarD-hipped” dinosaurs with the pubis bone pointed forward: The Saurischians radiated into the massive long-necked sauropods like Brachiosaurus and the meat-eating, bipedal theropoDs. The big theropoDs like Tyrannosaurus were the “carnosaurs” anD the little vicious ones like Velociraptor were the “coelurosaurs.” Seismosaurus Megalosaurus The structure of moDern birDs has been Dramatically shapeD by the DemanDs of efficient, powereD flight. That saiD, there are numerous similarities between birds and dinosaurs, especially those coelurosaurs. That’s the issue: Did birDs descenD directly from some basal stock of reptiles like the pseuDosuchians, or did they arise later, descending directly from the coelurosaur Dinosaurs? If birDs descenDeD directly from the pseuDosuchians, then the principle of monpohyleticism would dictate that birds be included with reptiles in the class Reptilia. If birDs descenDeD directly from the coelurosaurs, then birDs are not just “reptiles,” they are a specific type of reptile – dinosaurs! This is only really a big deal if we consiDer Dinosaurs to have gone extinct at the enD of the Cretaceous. If birds are dinosaurs, that means that the dinosaurs DID NOT die out at the end of the Cretaceous; thousanDs of them are still with us toDay. To examine this issue, we neeD to consider the anatomy of birds and reptiles – specifically dinosaurs. 3 Okay, to begin to unDerstanD birDs, we must first unDerstanD the first TetrapoDs – our deep ancestors, too. Basal reptiles of the Permian – the Cotylosaurs: When you consider the anatomy of birds, think about modifications from this basic reptilian boDy plan. This is the ancestral conDition of the basal reptiles. Next consider Euparkeria, a genus of Triassic pseuDosuchian thecoDont reptiles that preDate the Dinosaurs, from about 345 mya. This is a more derived boDy plan than the cotylosaurs. Let’s look at its skeleton: Axial skeleton IncluDes skull, all vertebrae (cervical, dorsal {thoracic, lumbar}, sacral anD cauDal), ribcage, anD sternum. Appendicular skeleton IncluDes limb bones plus scapula, coracoid, clavicles anD pelvis. Euparkeria’s ancestral conDition shows a long, bony tail, teeth in the jaw, at least 13 pairs of ribs, anD in the limbs, a soliD bone (femur anD humerus) proximally anD Distally paireD bones (tibia anD fibula in the hinDlimbs; raDius anD ulna in the forelimbs) that end in feet with five digits. A real theropod dinosaur: Compsognathus. This is a much more derived skeleton than that of Euparkeria. MoDifications incluDe a greater specialization in locomotion with a fully bipeDal gait anD lengthening of the hinDlimbs. Phalanges in the hinDlimbs number 4 – with only 3 making contact with the grounD – anD in the shorteneD forelimbs there are but 3 Digits. The number of ribs now reDuceD to 10 pairs. 4 MoDern birDs are moDifieD still further. In fact, most of the Differences we might see between a pluckeD turkey anD a Compsognathus are specific moDifications for more efficient flight. Without these moDifications for the DemanDs of flight, birDs are remarkably reptilian. Scales, lay eggs, single urogenital opening . .FEATHERS are the key: If it’s got feathers, then it’s a birD. Exceptional birDs: Hoatzin - (extant in South America) nestlings have claws on their wings. Though Hoatzin claws are best DevelopeD, you can also finD wing claws in waterfowl, owls, New WorlD vultures, etc. Hesperornis regalis: A Cretaceous birD that was structurally similar to a loon or cormorant, though flightless. Its bony beak had teeth. Charles Darwin publishes his ‘Origin of Species’ in which he describes his theory of evolution by natural selection - 1859. Predicted by that theory: “intermediate” forms in the fossil record (anD arounD toDay). Thomas Henry Huxley, citing skeletal similarities between dinosaurs anD moDern birDs was the first to publish his idea that birDs descenDeD from dinosaurs. [Not just reptiles, but specifically descenDeD from the dinosaurs.] Enter Archaeopteryx lithographica in 1862 - after Huxley’s proclamation: 5 Skeletons of Archaeopteryx (left) anD a moDern pigeon (Columba) (right). Skeletally, almost identical to small coelurosaurs. One important difference, though. Archaeopteryx haD feathers. Fully formeD anD moDern feathers - incluDing asymmetrical vanes on the flight feathers that are presumed to be an advanced character compatible with flight. Birds and feathered dinosaurs. These reconstructions from Matthew Martyniuk: Here’s what our most aDvanced reconstructions of Archaeopteryx suggest it probably looked like: 6 A group of coelurosaurs called the maniraptors were skeletally similar to Archaeopteryx: sickle-claw toe, semi-lunate carpal, posterior orientation of pubis, large eyes & braincase, hollow bones, 3-fingereD hanD, 4- toeD foot, fuseD clavicles, blaDelike scapula, seconDary bony palate, anD . Feathers! Some of the synapomorphies between moDern birDs, Archaeopteryx, anD maniraptors: *SeconDary palate *Hingelike ankle - no lateral movement *3-fingereD hanD, 4-toeD foot *High metabolism *Semi-lunate carpal *Big eyes, big brains *Furcula *FEATHERS! *Bladelike scapula Based mostly on spectacular fossil finds from quarries in China, we now have at least 13 different genera of coelurosaurs known to have haD feathers or “protofeathers” anD many other species, e.g., Velociraptor, are suspecteD of having been feathereD as well. Sinornithosaurus: Gigantoraptor anD relateD feathereD dinosaurs (Cretaceous PerioD): -! Here’s what Velociraptor probably really looked like: So, accorDing to John Ostrom, Phil Currie, Jack Horner, Bob Bakker, anD every thinking
Recommended publications
  • NOTES on the BIRDS of CHIRIKOF ISLAND, ALASKA Jack J
    NOTES ON THE BIRDS OF CHIRIKOF ISLAND, ALASKA JACK J. WITHROW, University of Alaska Museum, 907 Yukon Drive, Fairbanks, Alaska 99775; [email protected] ABSTRACT: Isolated in the western Gulf of Alaska 61 km from nearest land and 74 km southwest of the Kodiak archipelago, Chirikof Island has never seen a focused investigation of its avifauna. Annotated status and abundance for 89 species recorded during eight visits 2008–2014 presented here include eastern range extensions for three Beringian subspecies of the Pacific Wren (Troglodytes pacificus semidiensis), Song Sparrow (Melospiza melodia sanaka), and Gray-crowned Rosy-Finch (Leucost- icte tephrocotis griseonucha). A paucity of breeding bird species is thought to be a result of the long history of the presence of introduced cattle and introduced foxes (Vulpes lagopus), both of which persist to this day. Unique among sizable islands in southwestern Alaska, Chirikof Island (55° 50′ N 155° 37′ W) has escaped focused investigations of its avifauna, owing to its geographic isolation, lack of an all-weather anchorage, and absence of major seabird colonies. In contrast, nearly every other sizable island or group of islands in this region has been visited by biologists, and they or their data have added to the published literature on birds: the Aleutian Is- lands (Gibson and Byrd 2007), the Kodiak archipelago (Friedmann 1935), the Shumagin Islands (Bailey 1978), the Semidi Islands (Hatch and Hatch 1983a), the Sandman Reefs (Bailey and Faust 1980), and other, smaller islands off the Alaska Peninsula (Murie 1959, Bailey and Faust 1981, 1984). With the exception of most of the Kodiak archipelago these islands form part of the Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge (AMNWR), and many of these publications are focused largely on seabirds.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Ecology Enhancement
    PROTECTING NESTING BIRDS BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR VEGETATION AND CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS Version 3.0 May 2017 1 CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 3 2.0 BIRDS IN PORTLAND 4 3.0 NESTING BEHAVIOR OF PORTLAND BIRDS 4 3.1 Timing 4 3.2 Nesting Habitats 5 4.0 GENERAL GUIDELINES 9 4.1 What if Work Must Occur During Avoidance Periods? 10 4.2 Who Conducts a Nesting Bird Survey? 10 5.0 SPECIFIC GUIDELINES 10 5.1 Stream Enhancement Construction Projects 10 5.2 Invasive Species Management 10 - Blackberry - Clematis - Garlic Mustard - Hawthorne - Holly and Laurel - Ivy: Ground Ivy - Ivy: Tree Ivy - Knapweed, Tansy and Thistle - Knotweed - Purple Loosestrife - Reed Canarygrass - Yellow Flag Iris 5.3 Other Vegetation Management 14 - Live Tree Removal (Native and Non-Native) - Snag Removal - Shrub Removal (Native and Non-Native) - Grassland Mowing and Ground Cover Removal (Native and Non-Native) - Controlled Burn 5.4 Other Management Activities 16 - Removing Structures - Manipulating Water Levels 6.0 SENSITIVE AREAS 17 7.0 SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS 17 7.1 Species 17 7.2 Other Things to Keep in Mind 19 Best Management Practices: Avoiding Impacts on Nesting Birds Version 3.0 –May 2017 2 8.0 WHAT IF YOU FIND AN ACTIVE NEST ON A PROJECT SITE 19 DURING PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION? 9.0 WHAT IF YOU FIND A BABY BIRD OUT OF ITS NEST? 19 10.0 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR AVOIDING 20 IMPACTS ON NESTING BIRDS DURING CONSTRUCTION AND REVEGETATION PROJECTS APPENDICES A—Average Arrival Dates for Birds in the Portland Metro Area 21 B—Nesting Birds by Habitat in Portland 22 C—Bird Nesting Season and Work Windows 25 D—Nest Buffer Best Management Practices: 26 Protocol for Bird Nest Surveys, Buffers and Monitoring E—Vegetation and Other Management Recommendations 38 F—Special Status Bird Species Most Closely Associated with Special 45 Status Habitats G— If You Find a Baby Bird Out of its Nest on a Project Site 48 H—Additional Things You Can Do To Help Native Birds 49 FIGURES AND TABLES Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Percy Evans Freke
    Percy Evans Freke Percy Evans-Freke was born in month 1774, at birth place, to John Evans-Freke (born Evans) and Lady Elizabeth Evans-Freke (born Evans) (born Gore). John was born in 1743, in Ireland. Lady was born in 1741, in Newton Gore, Mayo, Ireland. Percy had 5 siblings: John Evans-Freke, George Evans-Freke and 3 other siblings. Percy married Dorothea Evans-Freke (born Harvey). They had 9 children: Fenton John Evans-Freke, Jane Grace Bernard (born EVANS-FREKE) and 7 other children. Percy married Unknown. Percy Evans Freke. + . Read more. Full Wikipedia Article. Percy Evans Freke. Dublin. 50% (1/1). Timeline of ornithology. Rossitten Bird Observatory. Freke. 50% (1/1). + . Read more. John Anthony Evans-freke worked in PERCY SOUTHERN ESTATES LIMITED, HOTSPUR PRODUCTIONS LIMITED, PERCY NORTHERN ESTATES LIMITED, PERCY FARMING COMPANY LIMITED, LINHOPE FARMING COMPANY LIMITED as a Land agent. Active Directorships 0. HOTSPUR PRODUCTIONS LIMITED 02 March 1992 - 07 April 1992. PERCY FARMING COMPANY LIMITED 11 January 1992 - 07 April 1992. PERCY NORTHERN ESTATES LIMITED 11 January 1992 - 07 April 1992. Evans-Freke of Castle Freke in the Baronetage of Ireland (1768, after 1807). 1st Baron Carbery. George Evans, 1st Baron Carbery (1680â“1749) married Anne Stafford (d.1757) sister and coheiress of William Stafford of Laxton. George Patrick Percy Evans-Freke, 7th Baron Carbery (1810â“1889). William Charles Evans-Freke, 8th Baron Carbery (1812â“1894). Algernon William George Evans-Freke, 9th Baron Carbery (1868â“1898). John Evans-Freke later Carbery, 10th Baron Carbery (1892â“1970). Percy Augustus Evans-Freke was the son of Percy Evans-Freke and Dorothea Harvey.2 He died on 15 January 1847, unmarried.1 He gained the rank of Lieutenant-Colonel.1 In 1845 he was granted the rank of a baron's younger son.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Review of Systematic Biology and Nomenclature - Alessandro Minelli
    BIOLOGICAL SCIENCE FUNDAMENTALS AND SYSTEMATICS – Vol. II - Historical Review of Systematic Biology and Nomenclature - Alessandro Minelli HISTORICAL REVIEW OF SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY AND NOMENCLATURE Alessandro Minelli Department of Biology, Via U. Bassi 58B, I-35131, Padova,Italy Keywords: Aristotle, Belon, Cesalpino, Ray, Linnaeus, Owen, Lamarck, Darwin, von Baer, Haeckel, Sokal, Sneath, Hennig, Mayr, Simpson, species, taxa, phylogeny, phenetic school, phylogenetic school, cladistics, evolutionary school, nomenclature, natural history museums. Contents 1. The Origins 2. From Classical Antiquity to the Renaissance Encyclopedias 3. From the First Monographers to Linnaeus 4. Concepts and Definitions: Species, Homology, Analogy 5. The Impact of Evolutionary Theory 6. The Last Few Decades 7. Nomenclature 8. Natural History Collections Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketch Summary The oldest roots of biological systematics are found in folk taxonomies, which are nearly universally developed by humankind to cope with the diversity of the living world. The logical background to the first modern attempts to rationalize the classifications was provided by Aristotle's logic, as embodied in Cesalpino's 16th century classification of plants. Major advances were provided in the following century by Ray, who paved the way for the work of Linnaeus, the author of standard treatises still regarded as the starting point of modern classification and nomenclature. Important conceptual progress was due to the French comparative anatomists of the early 19th century UNESCO(Cuvier, Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire) – andEOLSS to the first work in comparative embryology of von Baer. Biological systematics, however, was still searching for a unifying principle that could provide the foundation for a natural, rather than conventional, classification.SAMPLE This principle wasCHAPTERS provided by evolutionary theory: its effects on classification are already present in Lamarck, but their full deployment only happened in the 20th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Collation of Brisson's Genera of Birds with Those of Linnaeus
    59. 82:01 Article XXVII. COLLATION OF BRISSON'S GENERA OF BIRDS WITH THOSE OF LINNAEUS. BY J. A. ALLEN. CONTENTS. Page. Introduction ....................... 317 Brisson not greatly indebted to Linnaeus. 319 Linneus's indebtedness to Brisson .... .. ... .. 320 Brisson's methods and resources . .. 320 Brisson's genera . 322 Brisson and Linnaeus statistically compared .. .. .. 324 Brisson's 'Ornithologia' compared with the Aves of the tenth edition of Lin- naeus's 'Systema'. 325 Brisson's new genera and their Linnwan equivalents . 327 Brisson's new names for Linnaan genera . 330 Linnaean (1764 and 1766) new names for Brissonian genera . 330 Brissonian names adopted. by Linnaeus . 330 Brissonian names wrongly ascribed to other authors in Sharpe's 'Handlist of Birds'.330 The relation of six Brissonian genera to Linnlean genera . 332 Mergus Linn. and Merganser Briss. 332 Meleagris Linn. and Gallopavo Briss. 332 Alcedo Linn. and Ispida Briss... .. 332 Cotinga Briss. and Ampelis Linn. .. 333 Coracias Linn. and Galgulus Briss.. 333 Tangara Briss. and Tanagra Linn... ... 334 INTRODUCTION. In considering recently certain questions of ornithological nomenclature it became necessary to examine the works of Brisson and Linnaeus in con- siderable detail and this-examination finally led to a careful collation of Brisson's 'Ornithologia,' published in 1760, with the sixth, tenth, and twelfth editions of Linnaeus's 'Systema Naturae,' published respectively in 1748, 1758, and 1766. As every systematic ornithologist has had occasion to learn, Linnaeus's treatment of the class Aves was based on very imperfect knowledge of the suabject. As is well-known, this great systematist was primarily a botanist, secondarily a zoologist, and only incidentally a mammalogist and ornithol- ogist.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Birding Book
    Early Birding in Dutchess County 1870 - 1950 Before Binoculars to Field Guides by Stan DeOrsey Published on behalf of The Ralph T. Waterman Bird Club, Inc. Poughkeepsie, New York 2016 Copyright © 2016 by Stan DeOrsey All rights reserved First printing July 2016 Digital version June 2018, with minor changes and new pages added at the end. Digital version July 2019, pages added at end. Cover images: Front: - Frank Chapman’s Birds of Eastern North America (1912 ed.) - LS Horton’s post card of his Long-eared Owl photograph (1906). - Rhinebeck Bird Club’s second Year Book with Crosby’s “Birds and Seasons” articles (1916). - Chester Reed’s Bird Guide, Land Birds East of the Rockies (1908 ed.) - 3x binoculars c.1910. Back: 1880 - first bird list for Dutchess County by Winfrid Stearns. 1891 - The Oölogist’s Journal published in Poughkeepsie by Fred Stack. 1900 - specimen tag for Canada Warbler from CC Young collection at Vassar College. 1915 - membership application for Rhinebeck Bird Club. 1921 - Maunsell Crosby’s county bird list from Rhinebeck Bird Club’s last Year Book. 1939 - specimen tag from Vassar Brothers Institute Museum. 1943 - May Census checklist, reading: Raymond Guernsey, Frank L. Gardner, Jr., Ruth Turner & AF [Allen Frost] (James Gardner); May 16, 1943, 3:30am - 9:30pm; Overcast & Cold all day; Thompson Pond, Cruger Island, Mt. Rutson, Vandenburg’s Cove, Poughkeepsie, Lake Walton, Noxon [in LaGrange], Sylvan Lake, Crouse’s Store [in Union Vale], Chestnut Ridge, Brickyard Swamp, Manchester, & Home via Red Oaks Mill. They counted 117 species, James Gardner, Frank’s brother, added 3 more.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Bibliography of Ohio Ornithology
    Annotated Bibliography of Ohio Ornithology Bird records and studies from Ohio Copyright © 2017 Bill Whan Updated 18 November 2017 Below are references, some briefly annotated as underlined text where helpful, to published works on the ornithology of Ohio. Not covered are works not specific to Ohio, or publications concerning game propagation and introductions of alien species. Out-of-print volumes mentioned are on the shelves of good libraries, and increasingly on the Web. Key words (for example, localities, authors, English names of species) may be searched here. Every effort has been made to include all pertinent sources, but such a bibliography must remain a work in progress. The compiler would be grateful to hear from readers who have corrections or additional entries to suggest. After my labors thus far I am moved to offer my profound gratitude to bibliographers of the past, as well as to librarians of the present. This document incorporates bibliographic entries from Gerrick 1968, which in turn incorporates those of Osborn 1930. Users of this list will welcome the news that SORA has been been made available to the public at http://elibrary.unm.edu/sora/ by the University of New Mexico library; this searchable site offers downloadable copies of older back issues of the Auk, the Wilson Bulletin, and more than ten other important ornithological journals. The Ohio Naturalist and its successor the Ohio Journal of Science are also on line at https://kb.osu.edu/dspace/handle/1811/686 . The various natural history society journals of Cincinnati are on-line at http://library.cincymuseum.org/journals.htm , and past issues of the Cleveland Bird Calendar may be read at http://www.clevelandbirdcalendar.com/cbcarchives.htm .
    [Show full text]
  • Father of Modern Taxonomy Carl Linnaeus
    The roots of evolutionary History of Evolutionary Thought thinking Learning objectives: 2008 will mark the 150th anniversary 1. To describe major historical events and of the reading of addresses on the theory of key contributors to the development of Aristotle the theory of evolution. evolution by natural selection by Wallace and Darwin, but the roots of evolutionary thinking 384-322 BC 2. To outline the key components of Darwin’s are usually traced back to the Greek philosopher theory of evolution by natural selection. Aristotle. Aristotle developed the idea of a natural order “Scala Readings: Your text does not cover this topic (except naturae”, in which all forms of life were linked in a for box 2.1 and scattered parts of Ch. 2). “chain of being”. However, the people and events mentioned have Aristotle thought of species as unchanging and Wikipedia entries. reflecting a divine order. 336-2 1 336-2 2 Carl Linnaeus: father of Carl Linnaeus: father of modern taxonomy modern taxonomy Linnaeus is credited with developing the binomial Linnaeus recognized that individuals within a nomenclature system, in which each species name Linnaeus Linnaeus 1707-1778 species are capable of interbreeding, while 1707-1778 has two parts individuals in different species could not interbreed. Genus name + specific epithet = species name Linnaeus believed in the ‘balance of nature’, with each Cucurbita pepo = cultivated pumpkin species having a place in the divine plan. Species do Homo sapiens = modern human not change or go extinct. Later in life, Linnaeus acknowledged that new species Linnaeus also saw species as nested within broader could be formed by hybridization (by crossing groups, e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • How Has Our Knowledge of Dinosaur Diversity Through Geologic Time Changed Through Research History?
    How has our knowledge of dinosaur diversity through geologic time changed through research history? Jonathan P. Tennant1, Alfio Alessandro Chiarenza1 and Matthew Baron2,3 1 Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK 2 Department of Earth Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK 3 Earth Sciences Department, Natural History Museum, London, UK ABSTRACT Assessments of dinosaur macroevolution at any given time can be biased by the historical publication record. Recent studies have analysed patterns in dinosaur diversity that are based on secular variations in the numbers of published taxa. Many of these have employed a range of approaches that account for changes in the shape of the taxonomic abundance curve, which are largely dependent on databases compiled from the primary published literature. However, how these ‘corrected’ diversity patterns are influenced by the history of publication remains largely unknown. Here, we investigate the influence of publication history between 1991 and 2015 on our understanding of dinosaur evolution using raw diversity estimates and shareholder quorum subsampling for the three major subgroups: Ornithischia, Sauropodomorpha, and Theropoda. We find that, while sampling generally improves through time, there remain periods and regions in dinosaur evolutionary history where diversity estimates are highly volatile (e.g. the latest Jurassic of Europe, the mid-Cretaceous of North America, and the Late Cretaceous of South America). Our results show that historical changes in database compilation can often Submitted 24 May 2017 substantially influence our interpretations of dinosaur diversity. ‘Global’ estimates Accepted 6 February 2018 of diversity based on the fossil record are often also based on incomplete, and Published 19 February 2018 distinct regional signals, each subject to their own sampling history.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Taxonomy
    History of Taxonomy The history of taxonomy dates back to the origin of human language. Western scientific taxonomy started in Greek some hundred years BC and are here divided into prelinnaean and postlinnaean. The most important works are cited and the progress of taxonomy (with the focus on botanical taxonomy) are described up to the era of the Swedish botanist Carl Linnaeus, who founded modern taxonomy. The development after Linnaeus is characterized by a taxonomy that increasingly have come to reflect the paradigm of evolution. The used characters have extended from morphological to molecular. Nomenclatural rules have developed strongly during the 19th and 20th century, and during the last decade traditional nomenclature has been challenged by advocates of the Phylocode. Mariette Manktelow Dept of Systematic Biology Evolutionary Biology Centre Uppsala University Norbyv. 18D SE-752 36 Uppsala E-mail: [email protected] 1. Pre-Linnaean taxonomy 1.1. Earliest taxonomy Taxonomy is as old as the language skill of mankind. It has always been essential to know the names of edible as well as poisonous plants in order to communicate acquired experiences to other members of the family and the tribe. Since my profession is that of a systematic botanist, I will focus my lecture on botanical taxonomy. A taxonomist should be aware of that apart from scientific taxonomy there is and has always been folk taxonomy, which is of great importance in, for example, ethnobiological studies. When we speak about ancient taxonomy we usually mean the history in the Western world, starting with Romans and Greek. However, the earliest traces are not from the West, but from the East.
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical Perspective on the Citrus-Like Scent of the Crested Auklet Spencer G
    A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE ON THE CITRUS-LIKE SCENT OF THE CRESTED AUKLET SPENCER G. SEALY, Department of Zoology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N2, Canada; [email protected] ABSTRACT: The tangerine-like odor produced by breeding Crested Auklets (Aethia cristatella) of both sexes has attracted considerable attention recently as re- searchers attempt to determine its function. Chicks and one-year-old immatures do not produce the odor. Even though the odor has long been known to the Yu’pik people of St. Lawrence Island, naturalists and ornithologists visiting seabird colonies on the Aleu- tian Islands and in the Bering Sea from the mid-1700s through first half of the 20th century did not mention the odor. I trace the steps of two early ornithologists, Charles H. Townsend and Ira N. Gabrielson, whose numerous visits to auklet colonies in the late 1800s and 1940s, respectively, provided opportunities to smell the scent. The odor was eventually described on the basis of specimens smelled during preparation and on the basis of encounters with the auklets at sea. The closely related Whiskered Auklet (A. pygmaea) also produces an odor, but its function requires study. The plumage of both males and females of the highly social Crested Auk- let (Aethia cristatella) exudes an odor like that of a tangerine. The odor is more intense during the breeding season (Douglas et al. 2001, Hagelin et al. 2003). During the stereotyped “ruff-sniff” courtship display (Figure 1), males and females rub their bills in turn in the feathers of the nape and neck of their displaying partners (Jones 1993, Jones and Hunter 1993, Hunter and Jones 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • A Two-Hundred Year History of Ornithology, Avian Biology, Bird Watching, and Birding in Kansas (1810–2010)
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Zea E-Books Zea E-Books 8-4-2012 A Two-Hundred Year History of Ornithology, Avian Biology, Bird Watching, and Birding in Kansas (1810–2010) Thomas G. Shane [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/zeabook Recommended Citation Shane, Thomas G., "A Two-Hundred Year History of Ornithology, Avian Biology, Bird Watching, and Birding in Kansas (1810–2010)" (2012). Zea E-Books. 12. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/zeabook/12 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Zea E-Books at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Zea E-Books by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. A Two-Hundred Year History of Ornithology, Avian Biology, Bird Watching, and Birding in Kansas (1810 – 2010) Thomas G. Shane A Two-Hundred Year History of Ornithology, Avian Biology, Bird Watching, and Birding in Kansas (1810–2010) Thomas G. Shane Abstract The first two centuries of bird study in Kansas essentially can be split into 50 year intervals since Zebulon Pike’s 1810 publication, an account of his explora- tions. The first 50 years were records of explorers crossing Kansas collecting bird specimens; many were Army doctors. The second half of the 19th Century was a continuation of explorers and those affiliated with museums obtaining bird spec- imens and the establishment of colleges and universities with faculty members also collecting birds and making observations. The first half of the 20th Century was a period of college faculties primarily composed of vertebrate zoologists who had a few graduate students who studied birds.
    [Show full text]