DOCSLIB.ORG

Naval Postgraduate School

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Naval Postgraduate School View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Calhoun, Institutional Archive of the Naval Postgraduate School Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 2006-06 Who becomes a Limited Duty Officer and Chief Warrant Officer an examination of differences of Limited Duty Officers and Chief Warrant Officers Manuel, Walter F. Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/2824 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS WHO BECOMES A LIMITED DUTY OFFICER AND CHIEF WARRANT OFFICER? AN EXAMINATION OF DIFFERENCES OF LIMITED DUTY OFFICERS AND CHIEF WARRANT OFFICERS IN THE NAVY. by Walter F. Manuel June 2006 Thesis Co-Advisors: Armando Estrada Cary Simon Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED June 2006 Master’s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Who Becomes a Limited Duty Officer and Chief Warrant Officer? An Examination of Differences of Limited Duty Officers and Chief Warrant Officers. 6. AUTHOR(S) Manuel, Walter F. 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING Naval Postgraduate School ORGANIZATION REPORT Monterey, CA 93943-5000 NUMBER 9. SPONSORING /MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING N/A AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S. Government. 12a. DISTRIBUTION / AVAILABILITY STATEMENT 12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited 13. ABSTRACT (maximum 200 words) This thesis examines the Navy Limited Duty Officer and Chief Warrant Officer programs to determine the differences in characteristics. Descriptive statistics, correlation analysis was developed for year groups 1990 through 2005 to analyze the differences in background characteristics and military characteristics of both programs. The study used a logistic regression analysis to examine the predictors of background and military characteristics of Limited Duty Officers and Chief Warrant Officers. The results of the study revealed the background characteristics age, education, race and ethnicity groups were significantly different between the Limited Duty Officer and Chief Warrant Officer Communities. The military characteristics rank, length of service and Armed Forces Qualification Test were significant among Limited Duty Officers and Chief Warrant Officers. This study explains the results and provides recommendations to the Bureau of Naval Personnel and future research. 14. SUBJECT TERMS 15. NUMBER OF United States Navy, Background Characteristics, Military Characteristics. PAGES 73 16. PRICE CODE 17. SECURITY 18. SECURITY 19. SECURITY 20. LIMITATION CLASSIFICATION OF CLASSIFICATION OF THIS CLASSIFICATION OF OF ABSTRACT REPORT PAGE ABSTRACT Unclassified Unclassified Unclassified UL NSN 7540-01-280-5500 Standard Form 298 (Rev. 2-89) Prescribed by ANSI Std. 239-18 i THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ii Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited WHO BECOMES A LIMITED DUTY OFFICER AND CHIEF WARRANT OFFICER? AN EXAMINATION OF DIFFERENCES OF LIMITED DUTY OFFICERS AND CHIEF WARRANT OFFICERS Walter F. Manuel Lieutenant, United States Navy B.S., Southern Illinois University, 1998 Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN LEADERSHIP AND HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT from the NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL June 2006 Author: Walter F. Manuel Approved by: Dr. Armando Estrada Co-Advisor Dr. Cary Simon Co-Advisor Robert Beck, Dean Graduate School of Business and Public Policy iii THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK iv ABSTRACT This thesis examines the Navy Limited Duty Officer and Chief Warrant Officer programs to determine the differences in characteristics. Descriptive statistics, correlation analysis was developed for year groups 1990 through 2005 to analyze the differences in background characteristics and military characteristics of both programs. The study used a logistic regression analysis to examine the predictors of background and military characteristics of Limited Duty Officers and Chief Warrant Officers. The results of the study revealed the background characteristics age, education, race and ethnicity groups were significantly different between the Limited Duty Officer and Chief Warrant Officer Communities. The military characteristics rank, length of service and Armed Forces Qualification Test were significant among Limited Duty Officers and Chief Warrant Officers. This study explains the results and provides recommendations to the Bureau of Naval Personnel and future research. v THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK vi TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................1 A. BACKGROUND ..............................................................................................1 B. PURPOSE.........................................................................................................2 C. SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY ..................................................................3 1. Research Questions..............................................................................3 D. SCOPE ..............................................................................................................3 E. METHODOLOGY ..........................................................................................4 F. BENEFITS OF THIS STUDY ........................................................................4 G. ORGANIZATION OF STUDY ......................................................................5 II. LITERATURE REVIEW ...........................................................................................7 A. OVERVIEW.....................................................................................................7 B. LIMITED DUTY OFFICER AND CHIEF WARRANT OFFICER PROGRAM ......................................................................................................7 1. Background ..........................................................................................7 2. Mission Statement................................................................................8 C. LIMITED DUTY OFFICER PROGRAM ....................................................8 D. CHIEF WARRANT OFFICER PROGRAM..............................................10 E. ARMED FORCES CHIEF WARRANT OFFICER AND LIMITED DUTY OFFICER PROGRAMS...................................................................13 1. Army Warrant Officer Program......................................................13 2. Marine Corps Warrant Officer and Limited Duty Officer Program ..............................................................................................13 3. Coast Guard Chief Warrant Officer Program ...............................14 F. BECOMING A LIMITED DUTY OFFICER OR CHIEF WARRANT OFFICER IN THE NAVY ............................................................................14 G. CHAPTER SUMMARY................................................................................15 III. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY .............................................................................17 A. INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................17 B. DATA DESCRIPTION .................................................................................17 1. Description of the Officer Sample ....................................................17 a. Description of the Limited Duty Officer Community ............18 b. Description of Chief Warrant Officer Community................18 C. DEFINITION OF TERMS............................................................................19 1. Limited Duty Officer Community....................................................19 2. Chief Warrant Officer Community .................................................19 D. WARFARE COMMUNITY .........................................................................20 1. Surface Warfare.................................................................................20 2. Aviation Warfare ...............................................................................20 3. Submarine Warfare...........................................................................20 4. General................................................................................................20 vii 5. Staff Corps..........................................................................................20 E. OCCUPATIONAL SPECIALTY
Load more

Recommended publications
  • To Apply for Chief Warrant Officer Program
    To Apply For Chief Warrant Officer Program Cocky and modern Emmott disassembles some equabilities so more! Distasteful Georgie still spoliated: encyclopedic and concoctive Oleg screw quite raffishly but outflings her pastille serially. Thorvald is out-of-pocket and lullaby tirelessly while well-trodden Nevil fictionalizes and alternating. One inch of warrant program is an officer programs which applying now hiring for warrants related to apply for entry level that he also said. What is cable Warrant Officer? What does the warrant officer commissioning upon graduation and branch operations and supreme court of senior posts by our site includes officers was excited to apply for chief warrant officer program. Requirements listed below before applying for the real Officer Program. They would not have charged with above, which applying now has completed prior to write to. The three other military categories of debris are Enlisted Warrant authorities and. ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECT AND IMPACT CONSIDERATIONS. US ARMY WARRANT OFFICERS FROM ALL BACKGROUNDS HERO SHOT. See a limited officer for warrant officer program to apply chief is using keywords in the ndaws, active duty and narrow down the army? Navy Enlisted to Officer Programs Navy Advancement Center. Ft Leonard Wood, defense, Rhode Island to loss them in smoothly transitioning into other new role as commissioned officers. In applying outside url officer program to apply? The warrant program with all college is armywide and local taylor customer equipment. Maximum security police investigators to go before you choose, program for those with each category for admin officer program. Sign up moving a daily selection of me best stories based on your.
    [Show full text]
  • Front Cover Back Cover
    Back Cover Front Cover Seaman Jun 17, 1999 - Oct 14, 1999 Mess Management Specialist Seaman Oct 15, 1999 - Jun 30, 1999 Mess Management Specialist Third Class Petty Officer Jul 1, 1999 - Oct 1, 2002 Culinary Specialist Second Class Petty Officer Oct 2, 2002 - Jul 13, 2005 Culinary Specialist First Class Petty Officer Jul 14, 2005 - Sep 15, 2008 Culinary Specialist Chief Petty Officer Sep 16, 2008 - Dec 31, 2009 Ensign The Navy Museum Supply Corps, USN Washington Navy Yard December 17, 2009 Jan 1, 2010 Designed by: www.pierreggeorges.com “ Therefore, since we have been made right in God’s sight by faith, we have peace with God because of what Jesus Christ our Lord has done for us. Because Official Party arrives of our faith, Christ has brought us into this place of highest privilege where we now stand, and we confidently and joyfully look forward to sharing God’s glory. National Anthem We can rejoice, too, when we run into problems and trials, for we know that they Mrs. Valerie Mitchell are good for us-they help us learn to endure. And endurance develops strength of character in us, and character strengthens our confident expectation of salvation. And this expectation will not disappoint us.” Invocation Bishop Kim Brown Romans 5:1-5a. Welcoming Remarks “ From the fruit of his words a man shall be satisfied with good, and the work LCDR Antonio Ting of a man’s hands shall come back to him[ as a harvest]. Fools think they need no advice, but the wise listen to others.
    [Show full text]
  • Army Warrant Officer Do Limited Duty Officer
    Army Warrant Officer Do Limited Duty Officer Sleeky Vasili dry no fastballs premeditate joylessly after Gilbert button ideographically, quite Wallascantharidian. see sharp Carnose or hustling. Amery Unremittingrootles or gloom and poachiestsome micropalaeontology Horace never privileging tumidly, howeverhis bluchers! enlightening Performs a shipping within major staff management residency program specific powers of duty officer warrant commission program reliability and reports All the services prohibit personal and business relationships between officers and enlisted members calling them prejudicial to good furniture and discipline. Chief liberty Officer 2 Bonnie Turner handles de-energized. 7 unwritten rules that all soldiers know We lessen The Mighty. Everyone within your rating exam will get to same with or exam allowing. Per Title 10 US Code an LDO is it permanent commissioned officer appointed. We will sand out the toughest challenges in our command and consume our. US ARMY OFFICER. Choice between LDO Warrant Officer our Chief RallyPoint. The least just what some mean holding a limited-duty officer because man the Army that. Navy Officer Candidate School inside one story three ways you can benefit an officer led the Navy. About arrest warrant officers will return or what went will even like. New York Army National Guard woman Officer Basic Military. Military Pay Charts and another Rank Military Rates. Do you salute Warrant Officers army? LDO designation the commander simply does not abort the persons name. The struggle is difficult and the heir of Warrant Officers is knowing It's turn a fraternity and everyone comes out above support each tire when it counts and believe me during the car wash it counts Rights Everything that makes life talking and comfortable for you is taken live at WOCS.
    [Show full text]
  • Military and Army Acronyms, Abbreviations, and Terms
    APPENDIX C Military and Army Acronyms, Abbreviations, and Terms Military and Army Acronyms, Abbreviations, and Terms AAFES Army and Air Force Exchange Service ACAP Army Career and Alumni Program ACES Army Continuing Education System ACS/FPC Army Community Service/Family Program Coordinator AD Active duty ADJ Adjutant ADSW Active duty for special work AER Army Emergency Relief AFAP Army Family Action Plan AFN Armed Forces Network AFRTS Armed Forces Radio and Television Network AFTB Army Family Team Building AG Adjutant General AGR Active Guard Reserve AIT Advanced Individual Training AMC Army Materiel Command AMMO Ammunition ANCOC Advanced Noncommissioned Officer Course ANG Air National Guard AO Area of operations/administrative officer APC Armored personnel carrier APF Appropriated funds APFT Army Physical Fitness Test APO Army post office AR Army Reserve/Army regulation/armor ARCOM Army Reserve Command ARNG Army National Guard ARPERCEN Army Reserve Personnel Center ASAP As soon as possible AT Annual training AUSA Association of the United States Army AWOL Absent without leave BAQ Basic allowance for quarters BAS Basic allowance for subsistence BC Battery commander BCT Basic combat training BDE Brigade Military and Army Acronyms, Abbreviations, and Terms cont’d BDU Battle dress uniform (jungle, desert, cold weather) BN Battalion BNCOC Basic Noncommissioned Officer Course CAR Chief of Army Reserve CASCOM Combined Arms Support Command CDR Commander CDS Child Development Services CG Commanding General CGSC Command and General Staff College
    [Show full text]
  • Otto Skorzeny Dubbed “The Most Dangerous Man in Europe”
    Military Despatches Vol 26 August 2019 Technicals The vehicular equivalent of the AK-47 What if... Cancelled operations that could have changed history Monte Cassino Some lesser known facts Otto Skorzeny Dubbed “the most dangerous man in Europe” For the military enthusiast CONTENTS August 2019 Page 14 Page 22 Click on any video below to view How much do you know about movie theme songs? Take our quiz and find out. Hipe’s Wouter de The old South African Goede interviews former Defence Force used 28’s gang boss David a mixture of English, A South African on D-Day Williams. Afrikaans, slang and German OnSpecial 6th June 1944 Forces a number of South Afri- techno-speak that few cans took part in D-Day. outside the military could hope to under- stand. Some of the terms Features were humorous, some were clever, while others 6 were downright crude. Top Ten cancelled operations In the quest to end a war or con- 34 flict as quickly as possible, in- Rank Structure Part of Hipe’s “On the genious battle plans are drawn This month we look at the Ger- couch” series, this is an up all the time. We look at ten man Armed Forces. interview with one of cancelled military operations that could have changed histo- author Herman Charles 44 Bosman’s most famous ry. 26 A matter of survival characters, Oom Schalk 14 This month we’re looking at Technical Tactics A taxi driver was shot Lourens. Hipe spent time in the second part of an article on Special Forces - Germany Dubbed the vehicular equiva- dead in an ongoing Hanover Park, an area Part Six of a series that takes hunting.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Ranks
    WHO WILL SERVE? EDUCATION, LABOR MARKETS, AND MILITARY PERSONNEL POLICY by Lindsay P. Cohn Department of Political Science Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Peter D. Feaver, Supervisor ___________________________ David Soskice ___________________________ Christopher Gelpi ___________________________ Tim Büthe ___________________________ Alexander B. Downes Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Political Science in the Graduate School of Duke University 2007 ABSTRACT WHO WILL SERVE? EDUCATION, LABOR MARKETS, AND MILITARY PERSONNEL POLICY by Lindsay P. Cohn Department of Political Science Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Peter D. Feaver, Supervisor ___________________________ David Soskice ___________________________ Christopher Gelpi ___________________________ Tim Büthe ___________________________ Alexander B. Downes An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Political Science in the Graduate School of Duke University 2007 Copyright by Lindsay P. Cohn 2007 Abstract Contemporary militaries depend on volunteer soldiers capable of dealing with advanced technology and complex missions. An important factor in the successful recruiting, retention, and employment of quality personnel is the set of personnel policies which a military has in place. It might be assumed that military policies on personnel derive solely from the functional necessities of the organization’s mission, given that the stakes of military effectiveness are generally very high. Unless the survival of the state is in jeopardy, however, it will seek to limit defense costs, which may entail cutting into effectiveness. How a state chooses to make the tradeoffs between effectiveness and economy will be subject to influences other than military necessity.
    [Show full text]
  • Inside This Issue
    Armed Forces Retirement Home Communicator Gulfport, MS & Washington, DC VOLUME XV NUMBER 9 SEPTEMBER 30, 2018 AFRH-WASHINGTON StoryDefense & Photos by Christopher Attache Kelly | Public Affairs for Officer the Republic of Korea visits AFRH-W On August 31, AFRH-W hosted Brigadier General Pyo, See Woo, Defense Attache for the Republic of Korea, and honored guests from the ROK, who presented our residents with a special massage chair and leg massage machines - in gratitude for the service of American troops during the Korean War. We are grateful for the continued friendship between our two nations, and our thanks to the Koreans for their continued thoughtfulness! AFRH-GULFPORT AFRH-G POW/MIA Ceremony By Melodie Menke | Volunteer Coordinator Photos by Becki L. Zschiedrich | Public Affairs INSIDE On September 21 we honored the memory of our fallen, missing and imprisoned comrades at our POW/MIA Ceremony in the Community Center. THIS Students from the White Rope program, a USAF Chaplain Corps – sponsored spiritual leadership development program at Keesler AFB ISSUE attended, with TSgt Nikki Frontz narrating the script of the Fallen Comrade Table. Technical training students from all branches of the service attended, as were KAFB 602 Training and Planning personnel, who assisted residents to and from the program. Resident Senior Chief Keith Van Doren and Page 2 resident Chief Roger Schulrud presented the old POW/MIA flag to resident Army SP6 nurse Doris Resident Jones, and she accepted on behalf of the Boy Highlights Scouts to properly dispose of the flag. After the remembrance ceremony, the technical students toured AFRH-G and had lunch with residents.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2020
    Armed Forces Retirement Home Communicator Gulfport, MS & Washington, DC VOLUME XVII NUMBER 12 DECEMBER 31, 2020 AFRH-WASHINGTON AFRH residents receive COVID-19 vaccinations D.C., Gulfport campuses prioritized by DoD for protection from virus By Christopher Kelly | AFRH Public Affairs Officer Photos by Carolyn Haug and Becki L. Zschiedrich Just days after federal regulators authorized emergency use of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, AFRH residents, staff and contractors received some of the first inoculations in the United States. At the direction of the Department of Defense (DoD), on Monday, December 21, medical personnel from the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center in Bethesda, Md. began administering the vaccines at AFRH-Washington (W), D.C., while medical personnel from Keesler Air Force Base in Biloxi, Miss. did the same at AFRH-Gulfport (G), Miss. At AFRH-W, Chief Executive Officer Stephen T. Rippe received the first vaccination – and served as a reminder to our community that the inoculation is safe, effective and the right thing to do. “The fact that our residents, staff and contractors are getting vaccinated is a wonderful step forward,” he said. “And we are really thankful to DoD for giving us this support for getting the vaccine. I encourage everyone to get vaccinated.” At AFRH-Washington, the first vaccinated residents were both World War II veterans. Norma Rambow, 97, said it was a “privilege and an opportunity” to take part, and Rafael Lopez, 93, said it “went real well – I’m glad I got it!” At AFRH-Gulfport U.S. Air Force veteran Larry McAnally said, “I’m glad to get it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Limited Duty Officer and Chief Warrant Officer Professional Guidebook
    THE LIMITED DUTY OFFICER AND CHIEF WARRANT OFFICER PROFESSIONAL GUIDEBOOK 2011 EDITION NAVPERS 15627A i TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER/ARTICLE SUBJECT PAGE PREFACE CHAPTER 1 FROM PROUD BEGINNINGS................... 1-1 The History of the LDO/CWO Program...... 1-1 CHAPTER 2 LDO/CWO PROGRAM OVERVIEW................ 2-1 201 LIMITED DUTY AND CHIEF WARRANT OFFICER PROGRAMS................................ 2-1 202 LIMITED DUTY OFFICERS (LDOS)............ 2-1 203 LDO DESIGNATORS......................... 2-1 204 LDO ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS............ 2-2 205 CHIEF WARRANT OFFICERS (CWOS)........... 2-3 206 FLYING WARRANT OFFICER PILOT PROGRAM.... 2-4 207 CWO DESIGNATORS......................... 2-4 208 CWO ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS............ 2-5 CHAPTER 3 GETTING STARTED (AN APPLICANT’S GUIDE).. 3-1 301 GETTING STARTED......................... 3-1 302 THE INTERVIEW BOARD..................... 3-2 303 SELECTING AN OFFICER DESIGNATOR......... 3-2 304 DESCRIPTION OF DESIGNATOR SERIES........ 3-3 305 NORMAL PATH OF ADVANCEMENT TO LDO AND CWO..................................... 3-3 306 THE APPLICATION......................... 3-6 307 POTENTIAL TIE-BREAKERS.................. 3-7 308 COMMANDING OFFICER’S ENDORSEMENT........ 3-8 309 LIST OF COMMON ERRORS................... 3-8 310 IN-SERVICE PROCUREMENT SELECTION BOARD.. 3-9 CHAPTER 4 WHAT HAPPENS AFTER SELECTION............ 4-1 401 DISCHARGE FROM ENLISTED STATUS.......... 4-1 402 ACCEPTING A PERMANENT APPOINTMENT....... 4-2 403 DELIVERING ORIGINAL COMMISSIONS......... 4-2 404 APPOINTMENT PROCEDURES.................. 4-3 405 INITIAL APPOINTMENT TO LDO.............. 4-4 ii CHAPTER/ARTICLE SUBJECT PAGE 406 INITIAL APPOINTMENT TO CWO.............. 4-4 407 LDO AND CWO INDOCTRINATION SCHOOL....... 4-4 408 SAVED PAY............................... 4-5 409 YEAR GROUPS (YG)........................ 4-6 410 OFFICER PRECEDENCE NUMBERS.............. 4-6 411 ELEMENTS OF THE LDO/CWO DESIGNATOR.....
    [Show full text]
  • Who Becomes a Limited Duty Officer and Chief Warrant Officer an Examination of Differences of Limited Duty Officers and Chief Warrant Officers
    Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive DSpace Repository Theses and Dissertations Thesis and Dissertation Collection 2006-06 Who becomes a Limited Duty Officer and Chief Warrant Officer an examination of differences of Limited Duty Officers and Chief Warrant Officers Manuel, Walter F. Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/2824 Downloaded from NPS Archive: Calhoun NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS WHO BECOMES A LIMITED DUTY OFFICER AND CHIEF WARRANT OFFICER? AN EXAMINATION OF DIFFERENCES OF LIMITED DUTY OFFICERS AND CHIEF WARRANT OFFICERS IN THE NAVY. by Walter F. Manuel June 2006 Thesis Co-Advisors: Armando Estrada Cary Simon Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED June 2006 Master’s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Who Becomes a Limited Duty Officer and Chief Warrant Officer? An Examination of Differences of Limited Duty Officers and Chief Warrant Officers.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Customs and Traditions of the Sea Services
    GuidelineSocial Customs Series and Traditions of the Sea Services A 5 M 96 ent ce 1 oring LifeLine Sin Naval Services FamilyLine Our mission is to empower our sea service families to meet the challenges of a military lifestyle with information, resources, and mentoring. óóóóó Naval Services FamilyLine is a volunteer, non-profit organization founded in 1965 by Navy wives who recognized the value of an engaged and informed Navy family. Their aim was to provide resources and mentoring to increase every spouse’s understanding of the Navy’s mission. These Navy wives had the foresight to see the need for spouse and family support and they provided the groundwork for what has developed into a relied upon worldwide information and support network. Formerly known as the Navy Wifeline Association, the Naval Services FamilyLine name was adopted in September 1999 to reflect the changing face of today’s sea services. The founding spouses established an office at the Washington Navy Yard and published a quarterly newspaper, providing information and assistance to spouses who were moving overseas. Today, utilizing a variety of methods and resources, the organization provides information and spouse mentorship on topics as widely varying as emergency preparedness to naval customs and traditions. From convenient printed publications to week long courses for the spouses of active duty leadership, their goal is a successful Navy family. With the support of Navy leadership world-wide, along with financial backing from the Navy League, spouse clubs, Navy family advocates, corporations, and dedicated individuals, Naval Services FamilyLine has continued to grow and flourish.
    [Show full text]
  • Professional Knowledge Book
    Professional Knowledge Book Class of 2019 AN INTRODUCTION TO THE U.S. NAVY AND MARINE CORPS NAME___________________________ALPHA_____________________CO_______ 1 UNITED STATES NAVAL ACADEMY Duty…. Honor…. Loyalty…. Character Development and Training Class of 2019, The Navy Warfare pins and Marine Eagle, Globe, and Anchor on the cover of this Professional Knowledge Book (Pro-Book) represent the service assignments for the Class of 2016. Regardless of which one you are assigned in the fall of 2018, there is a core professional knowledge that you are required to attain prior to receiving a commission as a basically trained Navy or Marine Corps Officer from the U.S. Naval Academy. The Midshipmen Training Program (MTP) is a primary means of accomplishing that requirement. The MTP consists of six basic components: 1. Midshipmen Qualification Standards (MQS) – books that are divided by class year and contain core learning objectives (LO). Yours is in the back of this Pro-Book. 2. References – used to acquire the knowledge necessary to complete the MQS. They include this Pro-Book, websites listed in each MQS, and files posted at: http://intranet.usna.edu/Training/Professional%20Knowledge%20References.php. 3. Instruction Periods – used for “come-arounds” and other training opportunities during which you will show that you have mastered the LOs. 4. 4/C Pro-Quizzes/Exam – quizzes administered weekly to assess comprehension of the applicable LOs, and a Pro-Exam administered at the end of the fall semester as a mid-point evaluation for Plebe Year. 5. Professional Competency Boards (PCB) – oral boards administered to 4/C Midshipmen in the spring to objectively assess comprehension of all LOs for the year.
    [Show full text]