DOCSLIB.ORG

Epa Region 2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Epa Region 2 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 5 ELECTRONIC DATA DELIVERABLE VALID VALUES REFERENCE MANUAL Appendix to EPA Electronic Data Deliverable (EDD) Comprehensive Specification Manual . Aug, 2016 ELECTRONIC DATA DELIVERABLE VALID VALUES REFERENCE MANUAL Appendix to EPA Electronic Data Deliverable (EDD) Comprehensive Specification Manual TABLE OF CONTENTS Table A-1 Matrix .......................................................................................................................................... 5 Table A-2 Coord Geometric type ................................................................................................................. 7 Table A-3 Horizontal Collection Method ..................................................................................................... 7 Table A-4 Horizontal Accuracy Units .......................................................................................................... 8 Table A-5 Horizontal Datum ........................................................................................................................ 8 Table A-6 Elevation Collection Method ....................................................................................................... 8 Table A-7 Elevation Datum .......................................................................................................................... 9 Table A-8 Material ........................................................................................................................................ 9 Table A-9 Location Type ............................................................................................................................ 16 Table A-10 Qualifier ................................................................................................................................... 17 Table A-11 Result Type .............................................................................................................................. 19 Table A-12 Sample Type ............................................................................................................................ 19 Table A-13 Geologic Unit .......................................................................................................................... 20 Table A-14 Standard Preparation Method .................................................................................................. 23 Table A-15 Analyte .................................................................................................................................... 27 Table A-16 Lab Analysis Method Name .................................................................................................. 140 Table A-17 Laboratory/ Subcontractor/Company .................................................................................... 168 Table A-18 Unit ........................................................................................................................................ 177 Table A-19 Geology Soil Materials .......................................................................................................... 186 Table A-20 Well Segment and Materials .................................................................................................. 189 Table A-21 Basin- Hydrologic Unit Codes (HUC) .................................................................................. 190 Table A-22 EPA Facility IDs (EPA ID Code) .......................................................................................... 240 Table A-23 Company Code ...................................................................................................................... 252 Table A-24 Total or Dissolved ................................................................................................................. 261 Table A-25 Test Type ............................................................................................................................... 261 Table A-26 Test Batch Type ..................................................................................................................... 261 Table A-27 Preservative ........................................................................................................................... 262 Table A-28-Point Parameter ..................................................................................................................... 262 TABLE A-29 STATE .................................................................................................................................... 262 Table A-30 Sample Method ...................................................................................................................... 263 Table A-31 Reference Point ...................................................................................................................... 265 Table A-32 Source Scale .......................................................................................................................... 266 LIST OF FIGURES Figure A-1 Monitoring Well Diagram ........................................................................................ 266 Figure A-2 Example of Geologic Units ...................................................................................... 268 EPA R5 EDD – Valid Value Reference Manual United States . Version 4.1 August 18, 2016 i Environmental Protection Agency Valid Values Reference Manual All tables presented within this Manual are also located in the EDD .pdf file available on the EPA Region 5 EDD website: https://www.epa.gov/superfund/region-5-superfund-electronic-data- submission Table A-1 Matrix Matrix_Code Descriptions AA AMBIENT AIR AD DRILLING AIR AE AIR, VAPOR EXTRACTION WELL EFFLUENT AQ AIR QUALITY CONTROL MATRIX CA CINDER-ASH CF FLY ASH CINDER DC DRILL CUTTINGS GE GASEOUS EFFLUENT (STACK GAS) GL HEADSPACE OF LIQUID SAMPLE GS SOIL GAS LA AQUEOUS PHASE OF A MULTIPLE PHASE LIQUID OR SOLID SAMPLE LC LIQUID CONDENSATE LD DRILLING FLUID LE LIQUID EMULSION LF FLOATING/FREE PRODUCT ON GROUNDWATER TABLE LH FREE-FLOWING, OR LIQUID WASTE CONTAINING LESS THAN 0.5% DRY SOLIDS LM MULTIPLE PHASE LIQUID WASTE SAMPLE LO ORGANIC LIQUID LV LIQUID FROM VADOSE ZONE MH HAZARDOUS MULTIPLE PHASE WASTE OIL OIL SB BENTONITE SC CEMENT SD DRILL CUTTINGS, SOLID MATRIX SE SEDIMENT (ASSOCIATED WITH SURFACE WATER) SF FILTER SANDPACK SH SOLID WASTE CONTAINING GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 0.5% DRY SOLIDS SL SLUDGE SM WATER FILTER (SOLID MATERIAL USED TO FILTER WATER) SN MISCELLANEOUS SOLID MATERIALS - BUILDING MATERIALS SO SOIL SP CASING (PVC, STAINLESS STEEL, CAST IRON, IRON PIPING, ETC.) SQ SOIL/SOLID QUALITY CONTROL MATRIX SR WATER FILTER RESIDUE (SOLID THAT GETS FILTERED OUT OF WATER) SS SCRAPINGS ST SOLID WASTE SW SWAB OR WIPE TA ANIMAL TISSUE TP PLANT TISSUE TQ TISSUE QUALITY CONTROL MATRIX U UNKNOWN VW WATER VAPOR W WATER WA DRILL CUTTINGS, AQUEOUS MATRIX WC DRILLING WATER (USED FOR WELL CONSTRUCTION) WD WELL DEVELOPMENT WATER Region 5 Electronic Data Deliverable Version 4.1 United States ProtectionAgency Aug, 2016 - 5 - Table A-1 Matrix Matrix_Code Descriptions WE ESTUARY WG GROUND WATER WH EQUIPMENT WASH WATER, I.E., WATER USED FOR WASHING WL LEACHATE WO OCEAN WATER WP DRINKING WATER WQ WATER QUALITY CONTROL MATRIX WS SURFACE WATER WV WATER FROM VADOSE ZONE WW WASTE WATER WZ SPECIAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL MATRIX Region 5 Electronic Data Deliverable Version 4.1 United States ProtectionAgency Aug, 2016 - 6 - Table A-2 Coord Geometric type Geometric_type_code Description POINT GEOMETRIC TYPE Table A-3 Horizontal Collection Method Horiz_Collect_Method_Code Description A1 ADDRESS MATCHING-HOUSE NUMBER A2 ADDRESS MATCHING-BLOCK FACE A3 ADDRESS MATCHING-STREET CENTERLINE A4 ADDRESS MATCHING-NEAREST INTERSECTION A5 ADDRESS MATCHING-PRIMARY NAME A6 ADDRESS MATCHING-DIGITIZED AO ADDRESS MATCHING-OTHER C1 CENSUS BLOCK-1990-CENTROID C2 CENSUS BLOCK/GROUP-1990-CENTROID C3 CENSUS BLOCK TRACT-1990-CENTROID CO CENSUS OTHER GPS CARRIER PHASE STATIC RELATIVE – POSITIONING G1 TECHNIQUE GPS CARRIER PHASE KINEMATIC RELATIVE – POSITIONING G2 TECHNIQUE GPS CODE MEASUREMENTS (PSUEDO RANGE) – G3 DIFFERENTIAL (DGPS) GPS CODE MEASUREMENTS (PSUEDO RANGE) – PRECISE G4 POSITIONING SERVICE GPS CODE MEASUREMENTS (PSUEDO RANGE) – STANDARD G5 POSITIONING SERVICE SA OFF GPS CODE MEASUREMENTS (PSUEDO RANGE) – STANDARD G6 POSITIONING SERVICE SA ON I1 INTERPOLATION-MAP I2 INTERPOLATION-PHOTO I3 INTERPOLATION-SATELLITE IO INTERPOLATION-OTHER L1 LORAN P1 PUBLIC-LAND-SURVEY-QUARTERING P2 PUBLIC-LAND-SURVEY-FOOTING S1 CLASSICAL SURVEYING TECHNIQUES UN UNKNOWN Z1 ZIPCODE-CENTROID Region 5 Electronic Data Deliverable Version 4.1 United States ProtectionAgency Aug, 2016 - 7 - Table A-4 Horizontal Accuracy Units Horiz_Accuracy_Unit Description 1 DEGREES - HORZ ACCURACY UNIT, EPA MAD CODE 2 MINUTES - HORZ ACCURACY UNIT, EPA MAD CODE 3 SECONDS - HORZ ACCURACY UNIT, EPA MAD CODE 4 METERS - HORZ ACCURACY UNIT, EPA MAD CODE 5 FEET - HORZ ACCURACY UNIT, EPA MAD CODE 6 KILOMETERS - HORZ ACCURACY UNIT, EPA MAD CODE 7 MILES - HORZ ACCURACY UNIT, EPA MAD CODE Table A-5 Horizontal Datum Horiz_Datum_Code Description 1 NAD27 2 NAD83 O OTHER U UNKNOWN Table A-6 Elevation Collection Method Elev_Collect_Method_Code Description A1 ALTIMETRY GPS CARRIER PHASE STATIC RELATIVE POSITIONING G1 TECHNIQUE GPS CARRIER PHASE KINEMATIC RELATIVE POSITIONING G2 TECHNIQUE GPS CODE MEASUREMENTS (PSEUDO RANGE) – DIFFERENTIAL G3 (DGPS) GPS CODE MEASUREMENTS (PSEUDO RANGE) – PRECISE G4
Load more

Recommended publications
  • First Principles Prediction of Thermodynamic Properties
    2 First Principles Prediction of Thermodynamic Properties Hélio F. Dos Santos and Wagner B. De Almeida NEQC: Núcleo de Estudos em Química Computacional, Departamento de Química, ICE Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF), Campus Universitário Martelos, Juiz de Fora LQC-MM: Laboratório de Química Computacional e Modelagem Molecular Departamento de Química, ICEx, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) Campus Universitário, Pampulha, Belo Horizonte Brazil 1. Introduction The determination of the molecular structure is undoubtedly an important issue in chemistry. The knowledge of the tridimensional structure allows the understanding and prediction of the chemical-physics properties and the potential applications of the resulting material. Nevertheless, even for a pure substance, the structure and measured properties reflect the behavior of many distinct geometries (conformers) averaged by the Boltzmann distribution. In general, for flexible molecules, several conformers can be found and the analysis of the physical and chemical properties of these isomers is known as conformational analysis (Eliel, 1965). In most of the cases, the conformational processes are associated with small rotational barriers around single bonds, and this fact often leads to mixtures, in which many conformations may exist in equilibrium (Franklin & Feltkamp, 1965). Therefore, the determination of temperature-dependent conformational population is very much welcomed in conformational analysis studies carried out by both experimentalists and theoreticians.
    [Show full text]
  • The Japanese Village at Dugway Proving Ground: an Unexamined Context to the Firebombing of Japan
    Volume 16 | Issue 8 | Number 3 | Article ID 5136 | Apr 15, 2018 The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus The Japanese Village at Dugway Proving Ground: An Unexamined Context to the Firebombing of Japan Dylan J. Plung Abstract This paper explores a previously unexamined context to the firebombing of Japan. Analysis of the decisions leading up to construction and military testing conducted in 1943 at the Japanese Village at Dugway Proving Ground in Utah allows important insights into the evolution of US bombing strategy. The shift in US strategy from precision to carpet bombing, the testing and development of incendiary weaponry, and the institutionalization and rationalization of pursuing civilian targets throughout Japan are considered alongside this untold history. Additionally, a broader appreciation of World War II timelines is suggested. Keywords Napalm, firebombing, Dugway Proving Ground, Japanese Village, World War II, precision bombing, civilian bombing, Tokyo air raids. M-69 incendiary tests on Japanese style structures at Dugway Proving Ground. This and all subsequent images are from Standard Oil,Design and Construction of Typical German and Japanese Test Structures at Dugway Proving Grounds, Utah, 1943. Via JapanAirRaids.org "The M69/M69X bomb was designed to lodge in the most flammable part of the building—the ceiling beams." 1 16 | 8 | 3 APJ | JF - U.S. Army Dugway Proving Rhode Island) is unfenced open range filled Ground, Historical Fact Sheet, p. 1 with wildlife, cattle, blind curves, and vision- impeding hillsides. Isolated more than twenty miles beyond the gate of Dugway Proving Ground lies the remains of German-Japanese "Initially, it often seemed a home Village, where replicas of German and Japanese was unaffected, until the windows buildings were constructed, bombed at least 27 began to shine from within and times (see Table 1), and rebuilt in order to test then glowed ‘like a paper lantern’ incendiaries for use in World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • COURSE NAME CITY STATE ALBERTVILLE GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB Albertville Alabama MOUNTAIN VIEW GOLF COURSE Alden Alabama LAKEWINDS
    COURSE NAME CITY STATE ALBERTVILLE GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB Albertville Alabama MOUNTAIN VIEW GOLF COURSE Alden Alabama LAKEWINDS GOLF COURSE Alex City Alabama WILLOW POINT COUNTRY CLUB Alex City Alabama ALPINE BAY GOLF CLUB Alpine Alabama WHIPPORWHILL GOLF COURSE Altoona Alabama ANDALUSIA COUNTRY CLUB Andalusia Alabama EVANS BARNES GOLF COURSE Andalusia Alabama ANDERSON CREEK GOLF COURSE Anderson Alabama ANNISTON COUNTRY CLUB Anniston Alabama ANNISTON MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE Anniston Alabama B & J GOLF CENTER Anniston Alabama CANE CREEK GOLF COURSE Anniston Alabama CIDER RIDGE GOLF CLUB Anniston Alabama INDIAN OAKS GOLF CLUB Anniston Alabama PINE HILL COUNTRY CLUB Anniston Alabama BROOKSIDE GOLF COURSE Arab Alabama TWIN LAKES GOLF CLUB Arab Alabama UNION SPRINGS COUNTRY CLUB Armstrong Alabama CLAY COUNTY PUBLIC GOLF COURSE Ashland Alabama ATHENS GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB Athens Alabama CANEBRAKE GOLF CLUB Athens Alabama CHRISWOOD GOLF COURSE Athens Alabama SOUTHERN GALES GOLF CLUB Athens Alabama WOODLAND GOLF COURSE Athens Alabama ATMORE COUNTRY CLUB Atmore Alabama WILLS CREEK COUNTRY CLUB Attalla Alabama AUBURN LINKS AT MILL CREEK Auburn Alabama INDIAN PINES RECREATIONAL AUTHORITY Auburn Alabama MOORE'S MILL GOLF CLUB Auburn Alabama MOORE'S MILL GOLF CLUB Auburn Alabama PIN OAKS GOLF CLUB Auburn Alabama EUFAULA COUNTRY CLUB Bakerhill Alabama LAKEPOINT RESORT GOLF COURSE Bakerhill Alabama RED EAGLE GOLF COURSE Bakerhill Alabama WARRIOR POINT GOLF CLUB Barney Alabama HOLLY HILLS COUNTRY CLUB Bay Minette Alabama BENT BROOK GOLF COURSE Bess Alabama
    [Show full text]
  • New Chemistry of Donor-Acceptor Cycloalkanes and Studies Towards the Synthesis of Streptorubin B
    Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 8-2-2016 12:00 AM New Chemistry of Donor-Acceptor Cycloalkanes and Studies Towards the Synthesis of Streptorubin B Naresh Vemula The University of Western Ontario Supervisor Prof. Brian L. Pagenkopf The University of Western Ontario Graduate Program in Chemistry A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree in Doctor of Philosophy © Naresh Vemula 2016 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Part of the Organic Chemistry Commons Recommended Citation Vemula, Naresh, "New Chemistry of Donor-Acceptor Cycloalkanes and Studies Towards the Synthesis of Streptorubin B" (2016). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 3895. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/3895 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abstract and Keywords Abstract This dissertation presents two separate chapters within the broad area of synthetic organic chemistry. The first chapter describes the annelation chemistry of donor-acceptor (DA) cyclopropanes and cyclobutanes for the synthesis of heterocycles. The Yb(OTf)3-catalyzed [4+2] cycloaddition between DA cyclobutanes and nitrosoarenes facilitated the synthesis of tetrahydro-1,2-oxazines in good to excellent yields as single diastereomers. Additionally, an unexpected deoxygenation occurred with electron-rich nitrosoarenes under MgI2-catalysis that afforded pyrrolidine products. The GaCl3-catalyzed [4+2] cycloaddition of DA cyclobutanes and cis-diazenes provided hexahydropyridazine derivatives in good to excellent yields as single diastereomers.
    [Show full text]
  • Jefferson Proving Ground Employee
    Jefferson Proving Ground Employee and Pioneer Interviews Files Index Jefferson County Historical Society, 615 West First Street, Madison, IN 47250 [email protected] 812-265-2335 Carton No. 1 Community History Prior to the creation of JPG. 90% Documents, 10% Photographs Folder No. 1: Bridge # 27 Bennville Bridge, Jennings County; Photo of 3 arch bridge, color and B & W, photo of construction (1910) donated by Jesse Dwight Murphy. Folder No. 2: Housing/ Houses/Buildings; Photo, William and Cora Boggs Home and farm. Donated by Fauna Liter; Quarters 7, Quarters 15, Quarters 23 – former home of George Wehner, farm houses, Quarters 8 – former home of Charles Bently, Quarters 16, former home of William Boggs, Quarters 3, former home of Charles Jones, Quarters 4, former home of Harry R. Barber, Quarters 17, Quarters 21, Quarters 11, Quarters 12 moved to HDQ. Guest house at Old Timbers; donated by Fauna Liter; Oakdale school, base of silo on Craig farm, Wilson Dam at Big Creek – donated by Flora R. Wilson Thacker; envelope of small photos of JPG Qtrs, B & W small photos of Guardhouse, road with trees, Aerial of Old Timbers lodge, Headquarters Building with flag; list of quarters and former owners, Commanding officer’s Quarters, No. 1. Building 100, second floor hall of flags, “G” Firing Position, Tower 484, Bomb-field road, Building 100 with Jet planes flying over. Old Timbers lake 1977, Article, “Explains cost of JPG- Aug 8, 1941, Map with location of bridges Ed Caicedo, Inc. Folder No. 3: B & W small photos of Anderson Produce, Bryantsburg, J. W. Anderson, Minnie Anderson, Opal L.
    [Show full text]
  • In This Handout, All of Our Functional Groups Are Presented As Condensed Line Formulas, 2D and 3D Formulas and with Nomenclature Prefixes and Suffixes (If Present)
    In this handout, all of our functional groups are presented as condensed line formulas, 2D and 3D formulas and with nomenclature prefixes and suffixes (if present). Organic names are built on a foundation of alkanes, alkenes and alkynes. Those examples are presented first and you need to know those rules. The strategies can be found in Chapter 4 of our textbook (alkanes: pages 93-98, cycloalkanes 102-104, alkenes: pages 104-110, alkynes: pages 112-113 and combinations of all of them 113-115). After introducing examples of alkanes, alkenes, alkynes and combinations of them, the functional groups are presented in order of priority. A few nomenclature examples are provided for each of the functional groups. Examples of the various functional groups are presented on pages 115-135 in the textbook. Two overview pages are on pages 136-137. Some functional groups have a suffix name when they are the highest priority functional group and a prefix name when they are not the highest priority group, and these are added to the skeletal names with identifying numbers and stereochemistry terms (E and Z for alkenes, R and S for chiral centers and cis and trans for rings). Several low priority functional groups only have a prefix name. A few additional special patterns are shown on pages 98-102. The only way to learn this topic is practice (over and over). The best practice approach is to actually write out the names (on an extra piece of paper or on a white board, and then do it again). The same functional groups are used throughout the entire course.
    [Show full text]
  • Conversion of Waste Plastic Into Liquid Hydrocarbons (ENERGY) by Cuco 3 Catalyst: Application of Scientific Research on Plastic Pollution
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by International Institute for Science, Technology and Education (IISTE): E-Journals Chemical and Process Engineering Research www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-7467 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0913 (Online) Vol.48, 2017 Conversion of Waste Plastic into Liquid Hydrocarbons (ENERGY) by Cuco 3 Catalyst: Application of Scientific Research on Plastic Pollution Manvir Singh 1 Sudesh Kumar 1 Moinuddin Sarker 2 1.Department of Chemistry Banasthali University Rajasthan india 2.Waste Technologies LLC, Department of Research & Development, 1376 Chopsey Hill Road, Bridgeport, CT- 06606, USA Abstract Waste plastics were converted into valuable liquid hydrocarbon fuel. it is can be used as different purpose of energy-source such as petrol engines, diesel engines, generators, vehicles and its good source of chemicals etc. Plastics have many properties like light weight, high durability so its demand increases in every sector. Pyrolysis of the waste plastic (hdpe) was carried out with CuCO 3 catalysts and temperature range from 0 °C to 390 °C. The collected liquid hydrocarbons fuel was characterized by FT-IR, NMR, GCxGCMS spectrometer and fuel density was 78 g ml -1 and conversion was very good. The research paper exhibits concentrating on application for solving daily life issues and problems of plastic. Keywords: Pyrolysis, Liquid hydrocarbons fuel, CuCO 3 catalysts, Conversion, Glass reactor, GCxGCMS. Introduction First time plastic was invented by Alexander Parkes in 1862 that has a high molecular weight (Brydson 1999). A molecule formed by repetition of simple units is called polymer. Plastic is also called polymer for example polyethylene (Chanda 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • 94 Stat. 1782 Public Law 96-418—Oct
    PUBLIC LAW 96-418—OCT. 10, 1980 94 STAT. 1749 Public Law 96-418 96th Congress An Act To authorize certain construction at military installations for fiscal year 1981, and Oct. 10, 1980 for other purposes. [H.R. 7301] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That this Act may be Military cited as the "MiUtary Construction Authorization Act, 1981". Au'thSdon Act, 1981. TITLE I—ARMY AUTHORIZED ARMY CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS SEC. 101. The Secretary of the Army may establish or develop military installations and facilities by acquiring, constructing, con­ verting, rehabilitating, or installing permanent or temporary public works, including land acquisition, site preparation, appurtenances, utilities, and equipment, for the following acquisition and construc­ tion: INSIDE THE UNITED STATES UNITED STATES ARMY FORCES COMMAND Fort Bragg, North Carolina, $16,350,000. Fort Campbell, Kentucky, $14,200,000. Fort Carson, Colorado, $129,960,000. Fort Devens, Massachusetts, $1,000,000. Fort Drum, New York, $5,900,000. Fort Gillem, Georgia, $2,600,000. Fort Hood, Texas, $24,420,000. Fort Hunter-Liggett, California, $5,100,000. Fort Lewis, Washington, $16,000,000. Fort Ord, California, $4,700,000. Fort Polk, Louisiana, $14,800,000. Fort Riley, Kansas, $890,000. Fort Sam Houston, Texas, $3,750,000. Fort Stewart/Hunter Army Air Field, Georgia, $31,700,000. Presidio of San Francisco, California, $750,000. UNITED STATES ARMY WESTERN COMMAND Schofield Barracks, Hawaii, $12,220,000. Tripler Army Medical Center, Hawaii, $84,500,000. UNITED STATES ARMY TRAINING AND DOCTRINE COMMAND Fort A.
    [Show full text]
  • Jefferson Proving Ground Madison, Indiana Final Decision
    Jefferson Proving Ground Madison, Indiana Final Decision Document Addendum No Further Action Sites 5 and 6 Prepared for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Louisville District Louisville, Kentucky Total Environmental Restoration Contract DACW27-97-D-0015 Task Order 1200 August 16, 2001 MONTGOMERY WATSON MONTGOMERY WATSON 16 August 2001 Mr. Brooks Evens U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Louisville District 600 Martin Luther King Jr. Place Attn: CELRL-ED-G-ER Louisville, KY 40202-2230 Re: Final Decision Document Addendum, No Further Action, Sites 5/6 Jefferson Proving Ground, Madison, Indiana Dear Mr. Evens: Enclosed is a copy of the above-referenced Final Decision Document (DD) Addendum associated with Sites 5/6 at the Jefferson Proving Ground. This document was prepared under the Total Environmental Restoration Contract (TERC) Task Order 1200. The Final DD Addendum has been modified to include in Appendix D the latest USEPA comments (dated June 19, 2001) and the responses to those comments. Those comments and responses are as follows: 1. The Army's dioxin/furan risk assessment calculations appear to provide an adequate response to General Comment No. 1 in U.S. EPA's March 28, 2001 review of the Decision Document Addendum and Risk Assessment (Appendix C) for the No Further Action (NFA) Sites 5 and 6. As recommended, the dioxin/furan risk assessment calculations have been incorporated into the Decision Document Addendum and/or Risk Assessment via Appendix D. No further response is needed. Response: Comment noted. 2. The Army has still not adequately addressed General Comment Nos. 2 and 3, or Specific Comment Nos.
    [Show full text]
  • Selective Oxidation of Carbolide C–H Bonds by an Engineered Macrolide P450 Mono-Oxygenase
    Selective oxidation of carbolide C–H bonds by an engineered macrolide P450 mono-oxygenase Shengying Lia, Mani Raj Chaulagainb, Allison R. Knauffb, Larissa M. Podustc, John Montgomeryb,1, and David H. Shermana,b,d,1 aLife Sciences Institute and Department of Medicinal Chemistry, bDepartment of Chemistry, and dDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; and cDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158 Edited by Christopher T. Walsh, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, and approved September 3, 2009 (received for review June 27, 2009) Regio- and stereoselective oxidation of an unactivated C–H bond oxygenases, despite their fundamental dependence on substrate- remains a central challenge in organic chemistry. Considerable effort enzyme complementarity, which might limit their application in has been devoted to identifying transition metal complexes, biolog- synthetic chemistry (25). A number of previous efforts have sought ical catalysts, or simplified mimics, but limited success has been to overcome this limitation by employing protein engineering achieved. Cytochrome P450 mono-oxygenases are involved in diverse strategies, including scanning chimeragenesis (26, 27) and directed- types of regio- and stereoselective oxidations, and represent a prom- evolution (28–31) to generate nonnatural cytochrome P450s (e.g., ising biocatalyst to address this challenge. The application of this class P450BM3) with desired substrate specificities and abilities
    [Show full text]
  • Closure of Jefferson Proving Ground, Indiana, and Realignment to Yuma
    ___ - CLOSURE OF JEFFERSON PROVING GROUND INDIANA AND REALIGNMENT TO YUMA PROVING GROUND ARIZONA li 'J.fI..,o. Pre.1. VOLUME 1 OF 2 *YE=. GI.".] Pre.1. TEXT G,...d Final ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT . I STATEMENT September 1991 - . CLOSURE OF JEFFERSON PROVING GROUND, INDIANA AND REALIGNMENT TO WMA PROVING GROUND, ARIZONA Prepared by: Reviewed by: Louisville District U.S. Amy U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Materiel Command yy\C .- David E. Peixotto William 8. McCrath Colonel, Corps of Engineers Major General, US. Army Commander Chief of Staff Recommended for Approval by: Department of the Army Office of the Chief of Staff William A. Stofft Mabr General, General Staff Director of Management Approved by: Office of the Secretary of the Amy & 6,D& Lewis D. Walker Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Amy (Environment, Safety and Occupational Health) FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT CLOSURE OF JEFFERSON PROVING GROUND, INDlANA AND REALlGNMENT TO Wh4A PROVING GROUND, ARIZONA LEAD AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S.Amy Materiel Command (AMC); TITLE OFTHE PROPOSED ACTION Closure of Jefferson Proving Ground, Indiana and Realignment to Yuma Proving Ground, Arizona AFFECTED JURISDICTION: Jefferson Proving Ground: Jefferson, Jennings and 1Zipk-y Counties, Indiana. Yuma Proving Ground: Yuma and La Paz Counties, Arizona PREPARED BY David E. Peixotto, Colonel, Corps of Engineers, Commander, US. Army Corps of Engineers, Louisville District, P.O. Box 59, Louisville, KY 40201-0059 REVIEWED BY: William 8. McCrath, Major General, Chief of Staff, US. Army Matericl Command RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BY Williim A. Stofft, Major General, General Staff, Director of Management, Office of the Chief of Staff, Department of the Army APPROVED BY Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Inspector General, Memorandum for Assistant Secretary of the Army
    INSPECTOR GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 400 ARMY NAVY DRIVE ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA 22202-2884 REPORT December 26, 1989 NO. 90-028 MEMORANDUM FOR ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE ARMY (FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT) SUBJECT: Report on the Survey of the Acquisition and Management of Test Facilities at DoD Proving Grounds (Project No. 9AB-0037) Introduction This is our report on the Survey of the Acquisition and Management of Test Facilities at DoD Proving Grounds. The Acquisition Management Directorate made the survey from April to July 1989. The objective of the survey was to evaluate the effectiveness of procedures established to acquire and manage test facilities at DoD proving grounds. Our evaluation included an examination of existing test facilities, facility requirements, modernization plans, and funding. We also evaluated the effectiveness of the policies, procedures, and internal controls used to limit the proliferation of test facilities and instrumentation at the proving grounds. Scope of Survey We reviewed five DoD proving grounds managed and operated by the Department of the Army. The proving grounds were Aberdeen Proving Ground, Aberdeen, Maryland: Dugway Proving Ground, Dugway, Utah; Electronic Proving Ground, Fort Huachuca, Arizona: Jefferson Proving Ground, Madison, Indiana: and Yuma Proving Ground, Yuma, Arizona. We interviewed Army headquarters personnel, proving ground commanders, technical di rectors, and facility managers on acquisition, management, capacity, and utilization of test facilities. We toured and inspected existing manned and unmanned test facilities at each of the locations, reviewed the Army's improvement and modernization plans for instrumentation (computers, calibrators, radios, antennas, etc.) and military construction for proposed test facilities for FY 1989 to FY 1995.
    [Show full text]