DOCSLIB.ORG

5-The-Danelaw.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
5-The-Danelaw.Pdf Which Anglo-Saxon kingdom was the only one not to be defeated by the 1 Viking invasion? Brains in What was “Danegeld? Gear 2 Quick 6! Where did the first ever Viking attack on England take place? 3 What does the word “Viking” mean? 4 What was the Heptarchy? 5 What religion did the Anglo-Saxons believe in? 6 Fundamental British Values: Respect and Tolerance 14/09/2020 Today’s Title: Previous lesson: The Viking Invasions This lesson: The Danelaw The Danelaw Next lesson: Becoming England Learning Outcomes: Key Words: By the end of this lesson you will: Treaty = a formal agreement Can horrific between governments. events have - Describe what life was like in Danelaw England positive and in Anglo-Saxon England Peasant = A farmer or worker of consequences? low social status. - Explain how peoples lives changed after the invasions. What was the Danelaw? In the Battle of Edington King Alfred of Wessex was finally able to decisively defeat the Viking invaders. After the battle the Vikings and the Anglo-Saxons came to an agreement. They called this agreement the Treaty of Alfred and Guthrum. The Treaty of Alfred and Guthrum said: 1. The Vikings would be able to keep control of the land that they had already taken 2. They would stop attacking Anglo-Saxon land 3. The Viking leader, King Guthrum, would convert to Christianity. This treaty officially gave the Vikings control of a huge amount of land in Britain. This land became known as the Danelaw. In this area Scandinavian laws, culture, language and religion thrived. What was the Danelaw? How do you think life changed for people in the Danelaw? How do you think life changed for people in Anglo-Saxon England? How did life in England change? Together with a partner, you are going to research life in England. • One person is going to research life in Anglo- Saxon England. • The other person is going to research life in the Danelaw. • After 10 minutes, you are going to teach each other about what you have learned CHALLENGE: Which area would you prefer to live in? Think about comfort, security, freedom and happiness. Explain in a paragraph in your book, referring to both areas. Danelaw England Anglo-Saxon England Culture and Language Legal Changes Political Changes Military Changes Danelaw England Anglo-Saxon England Culture and Language Legal Changes Political Changes Military Changes - Anglo Saxon and - People had more - The “Heptarchy” - King Alfred Norse cultures legal freedoms ended, all the Anglo- established “Burhs” merged Saxons joined - Peasants could together under one - These were walled - Vikings established choose who they king, King Alfred of towns hundreds of new worked for Wessex settlements with - They had a garrison Scandinavian names - People could worship - He became the King of professional like –by and -thorpe whoever they wanted of the Anglo-Saxons soldiers who to protected them - Scandinavian - People began to talk language became - Disagreements were about “England” for - They were linked by common in the solved in a meeting the first time. new roads Danelaw, words like called a “thing” Husband and Law - He married his - They were located in entered the English daughters to strategic locations. language. important lords from other Anglo-Saxon - The Vikings struggled kingdoms to attack these strong defensive positions English towns with Viking names Think Pair Share What was the most important change in England after 878? GCSE Focus – 12 mark “Explain” questions The second GCSE question we will look at is a 12 mark “Explain…” question. This question appears on all of the GCSE exam papers. This makes it a very important question to understand. This question always says “Explain how/why…”. To get full marks, you need to identify three factors that answer the question and fully explain how. GCSE Focus – 12 mark “Explain” questions Question 2: Explain how England changed following the Viking invasions of 865 AD – 878 AD. (12 marks) You should aim to write three paragraphs to answer this question. Each paragraph should include one factor that answers the question. In each paragraph you should focus on using your expert knowledge of the topic to explain why the factors you have chosen answer the question. You get 50% of your marks for the strength of your knowledge, and 50% of your marks for the strength of your explanations. This question should take you 18 minutes in total. You should focus on ensuring that your answer is analytical and fully explains the points you are making. Be careful not to simply list facts without explaining them. Example Paragraph: One way that England changed after the Viking invasions is that the surviving Anglo- Saxons were forced to unify under one king, instead of continuing under the Heptarchy. A major reason why the Vikings were able to so easily defeat the Anglo- Saxon kingdoms was that they were not united. They all fought the Vikings on their own, without co-ordinating their forces or their strategies, this made it easy for the Vikings to pick them off one by one. After the Viking invasions the surviving Anglo- Saxons all united under one king, Alfred. King Alfred was the leader of Wessex, the only undefeated Anglo-Saxon kingdom. This gave Alfred and his family great power and Alfred was the first person to call himself the “King of the Anglo-Saxons”. This was significant because it was a major step towards the establishment of England as one united country. This also helped to stop any further Viking attacks because the remaining Anglo-Saxon community was far more organised and unified than it had been before and ensured that there were no more successful Viking attacks on Anglo-Saxon soil. Read through this paragraph – can you spot where I have shown precise knowledge of the topic and where I have explained my points. Example Paragraph: One way that England changed after the Viking invasions is that the surviving Anglo- Saxons were forced to unify under one king, instead of continuing under the Heptarchy. A major reason why the Vikings were able to so easily defeat the Anglo- Saxon kingdoms was that they were not united. They all fought the Vikings on their own, without co-ordinating their forces or their strategies, this made it easy for the Vikings to pick them off one by one. After the Viking invasions the surviving Anglo- Saxons all united under one king, Alfred. King Alfred was the leader of Wessex, the only undefeated Anglo-Saxon kingdom. This gave Alfred and his family great power and Alfred was the first person to call himself the “King of the Anglo-Saxons”. This was significant because it was a major step towards the establishment of England as one united country. This also helped to stop any further Viking attacks because the remaining Anglo-Saxon community was far more organised and unified than it had been before and ensured that there were no more successful Viking attacks on Anglo-Saxon soil. Read through this paragraph – can you spot where I have shown precise knowledge of the topic and where I have explained my points. GCSE Focus – 12 mark “Explain” questions Question 2: Explain how England changed following the Viking invasions of 865 AD – 878 AD. (12 marks) Have a go now at writing the second paragraph to this answer. Factors that you could talk about: - Military changes made by the Anglo-Saxons - Cultural changes in the Danelaw - Legal changes in the Danelaw. CHALLENGE: Can you finish the question by writing a third paragraph that considers another factor? Question 2: Explain how England changed following the Viking invasions of 865 AD – 878 AD. (12 marks) One way that England changed after the Viking invasions is that the surviving Anglo-Saxons were forced to unify under one king, instead of continuing under the Heptarchy. A major reason why the Vikings were able to so easily defeat the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms was that they were not united. They all fought the Vikings on their own, without co-ordinating their forces or their strategies, this made it easy for the Vikings to pick them off one by one. After the Viking invasions the surviving Anglo-Saxons all united under one king, Alfred. King Alfred was the leader of Wessex, the only undefeated Anglo-Saxon kingdom. This gave Alfred and his family great power and Alfred was the first person to call himself the “King of the Anglo- Saxons”. This was significant because it was a major step towards the establishment of England as one united country. This also helped to stop any further Viking attacks because the remaining Anglo-Saxon community was far more organised and unified than it had been before and ensured that there were no more successful Viking attacks on Anglo-Saxon soil. ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Vikings Chapter
    Unit 1 The European and Mediterranean world The Vikings In the late 8th century CE, Norse people (those from the North) began an era of raids and violence. For the next 200 years, these sea voyagers were feared by people beyond their Scandinavian homelands as erce plunderers who made lightning raids in warships. Monasteries and towns were ransacked, and countless people were killed or taken prisoner. This behaviour earned Norse people the title Vikingr, most probably meaning ‘pirate’ in early Scandinavian languages. By around 1000 CE, however, Vikings began settling in many of the places they had formerly raided. Some Viking leaders were given areas of land by foreign rulers in exchange for promises to stop the raids. Around this time, most Vikings stopped worshipping Norse gods and became Christians. 9A 9B How was Viking society What developments led to organised? Viking expansion? 1 Viking men spent much of their time away from 1 Before the 8th century the Vikings only ventured home, raiding towns and villages in foreign outside their homelands in order to trade. From the lands. How do you think this might have affected late 8th century onwards, however, they changed women’s roles within Viking society? from honest traders into violent raiders. What do you think may have motivated the Vikings to change in this way? 226 oxford big ideas humanities 8 victorian curriculum 09_OBI_HUMS8_VIC_07370_TXT_SI.indd 226 22/09/2016 8:43 am chapter Source 1 A Viking helmet 9 9C What developments led to How did Viking conquests Viking expansion? change societies? 1 Before the 8th century the Vikings only ventured 1 Christian monks, who were often the target of Viking outside their homelands in order to trade.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Old Norse on the English Language
    Antonius Gerardus Maria Poppelaars HUSBANDS, OUTLAWS AND KIDS: THE INFLUENCE OF OLD NORSE ON THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE HUSBANDS, OUTLAWS E KIDS: A INFLUÊNCIA DO NÓRDICO ANTIGO NA LÍNGUA INGLESA Antonius Gerardus Maria Poppelaars1 Abstract: What have common English words such as husbands, outlaws and kids and the sentence they are weak to do with Old Norse? Yet, all these examples are from Old Norse, the Norsemen’s language. However, the Norse influence on English is underestimated as the Norsemen are viewed as barbaric, violent pirates. Also, the Norman occupation of England and the Great Vowel Shift have obscured the Old Norse influence. These topics, plus the Viking Age, the Scandinavian presence in England, as well as the Old Norse linguistic influence on English and the supposed French influence of the Norman invasion will be described. The research for this etymological article was executed through a descriptive- qualitative approach. Concluded is that the Norsemen have intensively influenced English due to their military supremacy and their abilities to adaptation. Even the French-Norman French language has left marks on English. Nowadays, English is a lingua franca, leading to borrowings from English to many languages, which is often considered as invasive. But, English itself has borrowed from other languages, maintaining its proper character. Hence, it is hoped that this article may contribute to a greater acknowledgement of the Norse influence on English and undermine the scepticism towards the English language as every language has its importance. Keywords: Old Norse Loanwords, English Language, Viking Age, Etymology. Resumo: O que têm palavras inglesas comuns como husbands, outlaws e kids e a frase they are weak a ver com os Nórdicos? Todos esses exemplos são do nórdico antigo, a língua dos escandinavos.
    [Show full text]
  • The Viking Age
    Laval University From the SelectedWorks of Fathi Habashi March, 2020 The iV king Age Fathi Habashi Available at: https://works.bepress.com/fathi_habashi/615/ The Viking Age INTRODUCTION The Viking Age (793-1066) is a period in history during which the Scandinavians expanded and built settlements throughout Europe. They are sometimes referred to as Norsemen and known to the Greek as Varangians. They took two routes: the East - - the present-day Ukraine and Russia, and the West mainly in the present-day Iceland, Greenland, Newfoundland, Normandy, Italy, and the British Isles. The Viking were competent sailors, adept in land warfare as well as at sea. Their ships were light enough to be carried over land from one river system to another. Viking ships The motivation of the Viking to invade East and West is a problem to historians. Many theories were given none was the answer. For example, retaliation against forced conversion to Christianity by Charlemagne by killing any who refused to become baptized, seeking centers of wealth, kidnapping slaves, and a decline in the profitability of old trade routes. Viking ship in Oslo Museum The Vikings raids in the East and the West of Europe VIKINGS IN THE EAST The Dnieber The Vikings of Scandinavia came by way of the Gulf of Finland and sailed up the Dvina River as far as they could go, and then carried their ships across land to the Dnieper River, which flows south to the Black Sea. They raided villages then they became interested in trading with the Slavs. Using the Dnieper, they carried shiploads of furs, honey, and wax south to markets on the Black Sea, or sailed across that sea trade in Constantinople.
    [Show full text]
  • Wayneflete Tower, Esher, Surrey
    Wessex Archaeology Wayneflete Tower, Esher, Surrey. Archaeological Evaluation and Assessment of Results Ref: 59472.01 March 2006 Wayneflete Tower, Esher, Surrey Archaeological Evaluation and Assessment of Results Prepared on behalf of Videotext Communications Ltd 49 Goldhawk Road LONDON SW1 8QP By Wessex Archaeology Portway House Old Sarum Park SALISBURY Wiltshire SP4 6EB Report reference: 59472.01 March 2006 © Wessex Archaeology Limited 2006, all rights reserved Wessex Archaeology Limited is a Registered Charity No. 287786 Contents Summary Acknowledgements 1 BACKGROUND..................................................................................................5 1.1 Introduction................................................................................................5 1.2 Description of the Site................................................................................5 1.3 Historical Background...............................................................................5 1.4 Previous Archaeological Work ...............................................................12 2 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES...............................................................................13 3 METHODS.........................................................................................................14 3.1 Introduction..............................................................................................14 3.2 Dendrochronological Survey...................................................................14 3.3 Geophysical Survey..................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Viking Wirral … and the Battle of Brunanburh Professor Steve Harding
    Viking Wirral … and the Battle of Brunanburh Professor Steve Harding Neil Oliver, “History of Scotland” BBC2, 2009 “ The many armies, tens of thousands of warriors clashed at the site known as Brunanburh where the Mersey Estuary enters the sea . For decades afterwards it was simply known called the Great Battle. This was the mother of all dark-age bloodbaths and would define the shape of Britain into the modern era. Althouggg,h Athelstan emerged victorious, the resistance of the northern alliance had put an end to his dream of conquering the whole of Britain. This had been a battle for Britain, one of the most important battles in British historyyy and yet today ypp few people have even heard of it. 937 doesn’t quite have the ring of 1066 and yet Brunanburh was about much more than blood and conquest. This was a showdown between two very different ethnic identities – a Norse-Celtic alliance versus Anglo-Saxon. It aimed to settle once and for all whether Britain would be controlled by a single Imperial power or remain several separate kingdoms. A split in perceptions which, like it or not, is still with us today”. Some of the people who’ve been trying to sort it out Nic k Hig ham Pau l Cav ill Mic hae l Woo d John McNeal Dodgson 1928-1990 Plan •Background of Brunanburh • Evidence for Wirral location for the battle • If it did happen in Wirra l, w here is a like ly site for the battle • Consequences of the Battle for Wirral – and Britain Background of Brunanburh “Cherchez la Femme!” Ann Anderson (1964) The Story of Bromborough •TheThe Viking
    [Show full text]
  • Wessex and the Reign of Edmund Ii Ironside
    Chapter 16 Wessex and the Reign of Edmund ii Ironside David McDermott Edmund Ironside, the eldest surviving son of Æthelred ii (‘the Unready’), is an often overlooked political figure. This results primarily from the brevity of his reign, which lasted approximately seven months, from 23 April to 30 November 1016. It could also be said that Edmund’s legacy compares unfavourably with those of his forebears. Unlike other Anglo-Saxon Kings of England whose lon- ger reigns and periods of uninterrupted peace gave them opportunities to leg- islate, renovate the currency or reform the Church, Edmund’s brief rule was dominated by the need to quell initial domestic opposition to his rule, and prevent a determined foreign adversary seizing the throne. Edmund conduct- ed his kingship under demanding circumstances and for his resolute, indefati- gable and mostly successful resistance to Cnut, his career deserves to be dis- cussed and his successes acknowledged. Before discussing the importance of Wessex for Edmund Ironside, it is con- structive, at this stage, to clarify what is meant by ‘Wessex’. It is also fitting to use the definition of the region provided by Barbara Yorke. The core shires of Wessex may be reliably regarded as Devon, Somerset, Dorset, Wiltshire, Berk- shire and Hampshire (including the Isle of Wight).1 Following the victory of the West Saxon King Ecgbert at the battle of Ellendun (Wroughton, Wilts.) in 835, the borders of Wessex expanded, with the counties of Kent, Sussex, Surrey and Essex passing from Mercian to West Saxon control.2 Wessex was not the only region with which Edmund was associated, and nor was he the only king from the royal House of Wessex with connections to other regions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle’, 865–96
    Clare Downham, University of Liverpool 2 Annals, armies, and artistry: ‘The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle’, 865–96 ‘THE ANGLO-SAXON CHRONICLE’ from 865 to 896 is an engrossing description of affairs in England during the mature years of Alfred the Great, king of the West Saxons and then overking of the Anglo-Saxons (871–99). Much of the narrative is pre-occupied with the description of viking-campaigns, and it is a major source for understanding how vikings first came to conquer and settle English territory. Nevertheless, it is striking that the presentation of information in ‘The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle’ for those years was influenced by stylistic and political considerations. These can provide important clues to the circumstances of the composition of annals 865 to 896. For the years 865–96 there seem to be two distinct phases of chronicling activity in ‘The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle’. The first runs from A.D. 864/5 to 891/2 (annals 865–92) and belongs to the Chronicle’s ‘Common Stock’ (60 B.C.–A.D. 892), while the second constitutes its first continuation, for the four years 893– 6. Ruth Waterhouse has discussed the former section.1 She has drawn attention to the distinct word-order of annals 865–91 and the stylistic features (such as its verbs of motion) which distinguish it from what precedes and what follows.2 Peter Sawyer has argued persuasively that this section properly ends at 892 (not 891), which is therefore where that ‘Common Stock’ of the Chronicle ends.3 It is also in this section that the beginning of the year was calculated from September.4 1R.
    [Show full text]
  • ST EDMUND Dedicated to St Edmund and All the Bright Spirits of Old England Who Bring Comfort and Growing Hope That All the Wrong Shall Yet Be Made Right
    THE LIGHT FROM THE EAST: ENGLAND’S LOST PATRON SAINT: ST EDMUND Dedicated to St Edmund and all the Bright Spirits of Old England Who Bring Comfort and Growing Hope That all the Wrong Shall Yet Be Made Right. by Fr Andrew Phillips CONTENTS: Foreword Prologue: Seven Kingdoms and East Anglia Chapter One: Childhood of a King Chapter Two: Edmund’s Kingdom Chapter Three: Edmund’s Martyrdom Chapter Four: Sainthood of a King Epilogue: One Kingdom and Anglia Appendix Bibliography To Saint Edmund This booklet was originally published in parts in the first volume of Orthodox England (1997–1998). This online edition has been revised by Fr Andrew Phillips and reformatted by Daysign, 2020. The Light from the East: England’s Lost Patron Saint: St Edmund Foreword FOREWORD Tis a sad fact, illustrative of our long disdain and neglect of St Edmund 1, formerly much revered as the Patron Saint of England, that to this day there exists no Life of Ithe Saint which is readable, reliable and accessible to the modern reader. True, there is the Life written in Ramsey by St Abbo of Fleury over a thousand years ago in c. 985. Written in Latin but translated shortly afterwards into Old English by that most orthodox monk Ælfric, it is based on an eyewitness account. We think it reliable, but it is not accessible and it covers only a short period of the Saint’s life. True, a great many mediæval chroniclers wrote of St Edmund, among them – Hermann of Bury StEdmunds, Symeon of Durham, Geoffrey Gaimar, Geoffrey of Wells, William of Malmesbury, Osbert of Clare, Florence of Worcester, Jocelin of Brakelond, William of Ramsey, Henry of Huntingdon, Ingulf of Crowland, Matthew Paris, Roger of Wendover, Denis Piramus, Richard of Cirencester and John Lydgate.
    [Show full text]
  • The Physical Evolution of the North Avon Levels a Review and Summary of the Archaeological Implications
    The Physical Evolution of the North Avon Levels a Review and Summary of the Archaeological Implications By Michael J. Allen and Robert G. Scaife The Physical Evolution of the North Avon Levels: a Review and Summary of the Archaeological Implications by Michael J. Allen and Robert G. Scaife with contributions from J.R.L. Allen, Nigel G. Cameron, Alan J. Clapham, Rowena Gale, and Mark Robinson with an introduction by Julie Gardiner Wessex Archaeology Internet Reports Published 2010 by Wessex Archaeology Ltd Portway House, Old Sarum Park, Salisbury, SP4 6EB http://www.wessexarch.co.uk/ Copyright © Wessex Archaeology Ltd 2010 all rights reserved Wessex Archaeology Limited is a Registered Charity No. 287786 Contents List of Figures List of Plates List of Tables Editor’s Introduction, by Julie Gardiner .......................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION The Severn Levels ............................................................................................................................ 5 The Wentlooge Formation ............................................................................................................... 5 The Avon Levels .............................................................................................................................. 6 Background ...................................................................................................................................... 7 THE INVESTIGATIONS The research/fieldwork: methods of investigation ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • By Stuart Hill
    by Stuart Hill BACKGROUND The Anglo-Saxons settled in Britain from around 410AD. They originally formed many kingdoms which were led by individual leaders. Eventually, the Anglo-Saxons came together as one country ruled by one leader. Athelstan was crowned king of the Saxons in 925AD but didn’t become ‘King of the English’ until 927AD. The Battle of Brunanburh in 937AD was his greatest victory and confirmed England as an Anglo-Saxon kingdom. He was viewed as a great politician and a courageous soldier who was reported as never having lost a battle. Like many other Saxon leaders, much of his reign was spent fighting Danish invaders and other rebellions for control of the country. One of Athelstan’s greatest achievements was to unite England and to establish the boundaries of England, Scotland and Wales that still remain today. He also strengthened the laws of the country and established burhs (fortified towns) where trade could flourish. He could be described as ‘The First King of England’. (For more information see the historical note written by the author on pages 180-181.) EXPLORING THE BOOK – READING FOR DISCUSSION PROLOGUE 1. How does the prologue give the reader a clue as to what might happen in the story? 2. Why has the author included a prologue? CHAPTER I 1. The story is written in the first person from the perspective of Edwin. How would the first chapter change if it was written in the third person? Why do you think the author chose to use the first person? 2. Why does Edwin think he is lucky? 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Aethelflaed: History and Legend
    Quidditas Volume 34 Article 2 2013 Aethelflaed: History and Legend Kim Klimek Metropolitan State University of Denver Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/rmmra Part of the Comparative Literature Commons, History Commons, Philosophy Commons, and the Renaissance Studies Commons Recommended Citation Klimek, Kim (2013) "Aethelflaed: History and Legend," Quidditas: Vol. 34 , Article 2. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/rmmra/vol34/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Quidditas by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Quidditas 34 (2013) 11 Aethelflaed: History and Legend Kim Klimek Metropolitan State University of Denver This paper examines the place of Aethelflaed, Queen of the Mercians, in the written historical record. Looking at works like the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle and the Irish Annals, we find a woman whose rule acted as both a complement to and a corruption against the consolidations of Alfred the Great and Edward’s rule in Anglo-Saxon England. The alternative histories written by the Mercians and the Celtic areas of Ireland and Wales show us an alternative view to the colonization and solidification of West-Saxon rule. Introduction Aethelflaed, Queen and Lady of the Mercians, ruled the Anglo-Sax- on kingdom of Mercia from 911–918. Despite the deaths of both her husband and father and increasing Danish invasions into Anglo- Saxon territory, Aethelflaed not only held her territory but expanded it. She was a warrior queen whose Mercian army followed her west to fight the Welsh and north to attack the Danes.
    [Show full text]
  • Christianity Under Fire
    University of Iceland School of Humanities Department of English Christianity Under Fire: An Analysis of the Treatment of Religion in Three Novels by Bernard Cornwell B.A Essay Kjartan Birgir Kjartansson Kt.: 260192-2059 Supervisor: Ingibjörg Ágústsdóttir May 2015 Abstract This essay discusses the various different ways Christianity affects relations between different characters as well as political and historical events in three historical novels by Bernard Cornwell. Christianity had a large part to play in medieval societies and was often the source of many conflicts, especially in the British Isles. The three novels covered in the essay take place during different periods of time in the medieval history of England, that is, the Arthurian period in The Winter King, the Viking invasions by the Pagan Danes in The Last Kingdom and the high-medieval period in Harlequin. The essay discusses both the historical background of each novel and how these novels depict the Church as it was during the period in question, as well as the Christian and non-Christian characters and religions in general. Furthermore, this essay discusses the troubling youth and life of Bernard Cornwell and how he has admitted to be prejudiced against all religions. Christianity is a religion which Cornwell treats with special contempt, especially when the faith is contrasted with the pagan or otherwise non-Christian faiths in his novels. The medieval Christians in these novels are extremely prejudiced towards their non-Christian counterparts, their adversaries in warfare, whether Christian or not, and even women, who are treated more badly than non-Christian women. Additionally, the Christians are usually seen as more corrupt, lazy, unjust, hypocritical, arrogant and bigoted than others.
    [Show full text]