DOCSLIB.ORG

Our Conservation Vision

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Our Conservation Vision View of Mt Pisgah’s western slope, April 1972 Habitat Management Plan Howard Buford Recreation Area June 22, 2018 View of Mt Pisgah’s western slope, April 2017 Prepared by Lane County Parks Division, Public Works Department In partnership with Friends of Buford Park & Mt. Pisgah and Mount Pisgah Arboretum blank Acknowledgements Board of County Commissioners Lane County Parks Advisory Committee Buford Park Habitat Management Plan Technical Advisory Group Ed Alverson, The Nature Conservancy Paul Hoobyar, Watersheds Inc. (TAG Facilitator) Sandra Koike, Project intern Tom LoCascio, Mount Pisgah Arboretum Glenn Miller, Oregon Department of Agriculture Bruce Newhouse, Friends of Buford Park & Mt. Pisgah Roberta Swift and Garrett Dorsey, US Army Corps of Engineers Ben Tilley, Bonneville Power Administration Greg Wagenblast, Oregon Dept. of Forestry Jeff Ziller, Kelly Reis, Erik Moberly, Brian Wolfer, and Chris Yee, Oregon Dept. of Fish & Wildlife Lane County Public Works and Parks Division Ed Alverson Charlie Conrad Chad Hoffman Dan Hurley Fraser MacDonald John Moriarty Mike Russell Friends of Buford Park & Mt. Pisgah Jason Blazar Jeff Krueger Chris Orsinger Mount Pisgah Arboretum Brad van Appel Rich Kelly Photos provided by: Ed Alverson, Jason Blazar, Kate Blazar, Jeff Krueger, Chris Orsinger, Jim Reed. blank Table of Contents Chapter 1: Executive Summary ...........................................................................................................1 1.1 Conservation Vision ............................................................................................................................ 2 1.2 Management Goals ............................................................................................................................. 2 1.3 Moving Forward .................................................................................................................................. 3 1.4 Stakeholder Groups ............................................................................................................................ 3 1.5 The Planning Process .......................................................................................................................... 4 1.6 Methodology ....................................................................................................................................... 4 1.7 Public Input ......................................................................................................................................... 5 1.8 Chapter 1 References .......................................................................................................................... 6 Chapter 2: Purpose & Need ................................................................................................................7 2.1 Purpose ............................................................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Regional Context: Mount Pisgah’s Importance .................................................................................. 7 2.3 Rare Habitats at HBRA......................................................................................................................... 7 2.4 Managing Conservation Targets & Fire Risk in a Changing Climate ................................................... 9 2.5 Relationship to Previous Plans ............................................................................................................ 9 2.5.1 HBRA Master Plan (1994) ........................................................................................................... 9 2.5.2 Confluence of Coast and Middle Forks Willamette River Project Area – Alternatives Team Recommendation (1997) ......................................................................................................... 10 2.5.3 South Meadow Management Plan (2002) ............................................................................... 10 2.5.4 Rivers to Ridges Open Space Study (2003) .............................................................................. 11 2.5.5 Oregon Conservation Strategy (2006, updated in 2016) ......................................................... 11 2.5.6 Willamette River Open Space Vision (2010) ............................................................................ 12 2.5.7 Lane County Parks and Open Space Master Plan (1981) and Lane County Parks Master Plan (revision in development) ....................................................................................................... 13 2.5.8 Other Plans and Assessments .................................................................................................. 13 2.6 Chapter 2 References ........................................................................................................................ 14 Chapter 3: Methodology .................................................................................................................. 15 3.1 The Conservation Action Planning Process ....................................................................................... 15 3.1.1 Why This Tool Was Selected .................................................................................................... 15 3.1.2 Other Conservation Action Plans developed in Western Oregon............................................ 15 3.2 Planning Process Overview ............................................................................................................... 16 3.2.1 Technical Advisory Group ........................................................................................................ 16 3.3 Public Involvement ............................................................................................................................ 17 3.3.1 Lane County Technical Review ................................................................................................. 18 3.3.2 Habitat Management Plan, Version 2 ...................................................................................... 18 3.3.3 Habitat Management Plan, Version 3 ...................................................................................... 18 3.4 Chapter 3 References ........................................................................................................................ 19 Chapter 4: Conservation Vision, Conservation Targets, and Other Habitats ........................................ 20 4.1 Conservation Vision Statement......................................................................................................... 20 4.2 Conservation Targets ........................................................................................................................ 20 4.2.1 Upland prairie and savanna ..................................................................................................... 21 4.2.2 Oregon Vesper Sparrow ........................................................................................................... 22 4.2.3 Oak Woodland .......................................................................................................................... 22 4.2.5 Bradshaw’s lomatium ............................................................................................................... 24 4.2.6 Buckbrush chaparral ................................................................................................................ 25 4.2.7 Willamette riparian systems and associated floodplain .......................................................... 25 4.2.8 Creeks and Streams .................................................................................................................. 26 4.2.9 Visitor Experience..................................................................................................................... 27 4.2.10 Other Habitats ........................................................................................................................ 27 4.3 Projected Increase in Extent of Focal Conservation Target Habitats and Resources ....................... 29 4.4 Chapter 4 References ........................................................................................................................ 32 Chapter 5: Viability and Threats to the Conservation Targets ............................................................ 32 5.1 Assessing the Viability of Each Conservation Target ........................................................................ 34 5.2 Assessing Threats to Each Conservation Target................................................................................ 34 5.3 Chapter 5 References ........................................................................................................................ 34 Chapter 6: Goals and Strategies ........................................................................................................ 44 6.1 Overview of Goals and Strategies ..................................................................................................... 44 6.2 Chapter 6 References ........................................................................................................................ 51 Chapter 7: Enhancing Visitor Experience While Managing Habitats .................................................... 52 7.1 Recreational and Educational Values of Healthy Native Habitats .................................................... 52 7.2 Balancing Visitor experience
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Oak Savanna Exhibit by August Jackson, Interpretive Coordinator
    Summer 2019 Volume XLIX, Issue 3 THE MOUNT PISGAH ARBORETUM QUARTERLY NEWSLETTER Oak Savanna Exhibit by August Jackson, Interpretive Coordinator The first European explorers and Euro-American colonizers described the Willamette Valley as a vast expanse of open prairie, dotted here and there with mature trees—mostly oaks—which impressed upon them the feeling of a “park” or “garden.” The only real forests to be found were on the foothills and knolls, and densely cloaking the braided and ponderous Willamette River. On his journey through the Willamette Valley in September of 1826, the botanist and explorer David Douglas discovered the cause of this park-like setting, noting that nearly the entire valley floor had been recently burned. Douglas remarked that some of the native Kalapuya people explained to him that they conducted the burns for the purpose of procuring food. Since the cessation of native burning practices, Oregon white oak savanna has become one of the most critically endangered ecosystems in North Photo by Kimberly Cullen America, with as little as 1% of the original extent remaining. Mount Pisgah Arboretum’s new Oak Savanna Exhibit aims to honor the cultural heritage of this quintessential Willamette Valley landscape and celebrates the biodiverse ecosystem that was supported by considerate and considerable Kalupyan management practices. The exhibit consists of two meditative paths with scattered vignettes that share some of the cultural and ecological outcomes of regular burning. These paths converge in the center around a planter showcasing a number of native plants that were important traditional food sources, and which benefited from regular burning.
    [Show full text]
  • West Pisgah Community Vision Report FINAL
    West Pisgah Community Vision and Strategies Summary Report March 2019 West Pisgah Community Vision Report – March 14, 2019 Page i Acknowledgments Round Table Participants A special thank you to the following individuals who volunteered to serve on the West Pisgah Community Round Table and dedicated time, ideas, insight into this visioning effort. The content of this summary report is based on a compilation of Round Table and community input and does not represent the opinion or endorsement by any one individual. Round Table members included: • Amanda Gilbert (Coast Fork Willamette Watershed Council) * • Derek Hansen (resident, farmer) • Charlotte Helmer (resident, historic restoration professional) * • John F. Helmer (resident) * • Leda Hermecz (owner of 100 Mile Bakery) • Gayle Landt (land owner, equestrian) • Charles Little (resident, farmer) • Robin Meacher (McKenzie River Trust) * • Glen Miller (resident, farmer) • Mary Moore (resident, farmer) • Greg Nieckarz (resident) • Chris Orsinger (Friends of Buford Park & Mount Pisgah) * • Jared Pruch (Rogue Farm Corps) * • Jim Straub (land owner) * Indicates those Round Table members who also volunteered to serve on the project Steering Committee. The Steering Committee was responsible for providing regular input on the effort, recruiting Round Table members, reviewing draft materials, and helping set agendas for the Round Table meetings. Project Team • Jeff Krueger (JK Environments, facilitation and report production) • Laurie Krei (Friends of Buford Park & Mount Pisgah, project support) • Catia Juliana (Friends of Buford Park & Mount Pisgah, project support) Thanks to Meyer Memorial Trust This effort would not have been possible without funding assistance from Meyer Memorial Trust (MMT) as part of its Willamette River Initiative. MMT is currently supporting numerous efforts to improve the quality of the Willamette River as one way they hope to make a significant difference in improving the lives of Oregonians.
    [Show full text]
  • Howard Buford Recreation Area I ------~·I· I' Master Plan
    ' . ' I Howard Buford Recreation Area I ----------~·i· i' Master Plan ! I' ' ' ! I ,, . 'I i~'. I I I . I ,i BOOK154?AGf 1252 Jll\\16 i994 IN TUE BO~.RD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF LANE COUNTY, OREGON :·ou~'J'fV CLERK ' 1056 ) IN THE MATTER OF ADOPTING THE HOWARD BUFORD ) RECREATION AREA MASTER PLAN AS A REFINEMEN'r TC ) THE EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD METROPOLITl\N AREA GEN­ ) ERAL PLAN, AND ADOPTING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Lane County has received a proposals from the Lane County Parks Division for the adoption of a master plan entitlecl the "Howarcl Buforcl Recreation Area Master Plan" (July 1993), which analyzes the need for new and impJtOved facilities and proposes protection measures within the Howard Buford Recreation Area; and WHEREAS, the Lane County Parke Advisory Committee reviewed and approved the Howard Buford Recreation Area Master Plan in June 1993 and forwarded the Master Flan to.the Lane county Planning commission for review and recommendation; and wagREAS, the Lane County Planning Commission, in regular meeting and public hearing of March and April 1992, clicl recommencl approval of the request; ancl WHEREAS, eviclenca exists within the record indicating that the proposal meets the requirements of Lane code chapter 12, and the requirements of applicable state and local law; and " WHEREAS, The Board of County commissioners has conducted public hearings and is now ready to take action; NOW, ~HEREFORE, the Board of County Commissioners of Lane County ordains as follows; The Howard Buforcl Recreation Area Master Plan (July 1993), copy attached as Exhibit 11 A11 and incorporated herein by this reference, is acloptecl as a refinement to the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • NPSO Bulletin Apr 04
    Bulletin of the Native Plant Society of Oregon Dedicated to the enjoyment, conservation and study of Oregon’s native plants and habitats VOLUME 37, NO. 4APRIL 2004 The Mountains of Northeastern Oregon, Pt. 1 by Loren Russell, Corvallis Chapter center of scenic beauty and floris- Blue Mountain Region and extend for lumbia Basin to the north, and of the Atic diversity—home to about 2400 more than 200 miles, from the north- northern Great Basin to the south. species of vascular plants, more than 60 eastern corner of Oregon and adjacent There are also large areas of lower, drier percent of the state’s flora—the moun- southeastern Washington to Prineville grassland along the John Day and tains of northeastern Oregon have long in central Oregon. Diverse in its geolo- Crooked rivers, and prairies such as been one of my favorite destinations for gy, soils, and landforms, half of the re- those of the Grand Ronde Valley near hiking and botanizing. The Wallowas gion is covered by eruptive igneous La Grande and of high basins (e.g., Big and the Blue Mountain complex, which rocks, primarily the vast Columbia Summit Prairie in the Ochocos). In the includes the Ochoco, Maury, Aldrich, River flood basalts and the older John western part of the region, timberline is Strawberry, Greenhorn and Elkhorn Day River ash and rhyolite deposits. reached only on Strawberry Mountain, ranges, are collectively known as the There are also large exposures of granite but in the Elkhorn and Wallowa and of sedimentary rocks, including Mountains, alpine and subalpine vege- limestone, and some exposures of serpen- tation is the most extensive and diverse tine rocks; there are significant parallels in Oregon.
    [Show full text]
  • Rivers to Ridges Metropolitan Regional Parks and Open Space Study Vision and Strategies
    Rivers to Ridges Metropolitan Regional Parks and Open Space Study Vision and Strategies June 2003 Endorsements Elected and appointed officials As a confirmation of the cooperative effort that created this regional vision, the following elected and appointed bodies have endorsed the vision by unanimous consent: • Springfield Planning Commission (November 19, 2002) • Lane County Board of Commissioners (February 12, 2003) • Eugene Planning Commission (March 3, 2003) • Eugene City Council (March 12, 2003) • Willamalane Park and Recreation District (April 2, 2003) • Springfield City Council (May 5, 2003) Other Groups and Organizations Endorsing the Vision: • American Society of Landscape Architects • Lane County Parks Advisory Committee • Eugene Advisory Committee on Parks, • Lane County Audubon Open Space, and Recreation • League of Women Voters • Eugene to Pacific Crest Trail Board • Long Tom Watershed Council • Friends of Buford Park and Mount Pisgah • McKenzie River Trust • Friends of Mount Pisgah Arboretum • Willamette Resources Education Network Acknowledgements The Rivers to Ridges Vision was developed based on extensive input received between December 2001 and May 2003 from citizens, elected officials, and staff from local, state, and federal agencies. Representatives from the cities of Eugene and Springfield, Willama- lane Park and Recreation District, Lane County, and Lane Council of Governments formed the local staff team, with policy direction provided by the Metropolitan Policy Committee. A description of the citizen outreach
    [Show full text]
  • Rivers to Ridges Annual Report 2018 Fifteenth Anniversary Edition
    Rivers to Ridges Annual Report 2018 Fifteenth Anniversary Edition Section 1: Rivers to Ridges Partnership Background and Overview .............................................1 1.1 The Rivers to Ridges Partnership .............................................................................................................................................1 Camas at THNA 1.2 Rivers to Ridges Annual Report ...............................................................................................................................................2 Photo credit: MFWWC 1.3 Rivers to Ridges Online ............................................................................................................................................................2 Section 2: Land Protection ..........................................................................................................3 2.1 Land Protection in 2018 ..........................................................................................................................................................3 2.2 Summary of Overall Partnership Acreages in the Rivers to Ridges Planning Area .................................................................................3 Section 3: Habitat Restoration and Management ........................................................................4 3.1 Controlled Ecological Burns .....................................................................................................................................................4 3.1.1 Multiple cologicalE
    [Show full text]
  • Willamette Valley Conservation Study: Nature-Based Recreation and Educational Opportunities and Underserved Areas Assessment
    Willamette Valley Conservation Study: Nature-based Recreation and Educational Opportunities and Underserved Areas Assessment Prepared for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Pacific Region Prepared by SWCA Environmental Consultants February 2013 WILLAMETTE VALLEY CONSERVATION STUDY: NATURE- BASED RECREATION AND EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES AND UNDERSERVED AREAS ASSESSMENT Prepared for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Pacific Region 911 NE 11th Ave Portland, Oregon 97232 503.872.2700 Prepared by SWCA Environmental Consultants 1220 SW Morrison Street, Suite 700 Portland, Oregon 97205 503.224.0333 www.swca.com February 25, 2012 Willamette Valley Conservation Study: Nature-based Recreation and Educational Opportunities and Underserved Areas Assessment CONTENTS 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.1. Study Area .................................................................................................................................... 2 2. Methods .............................................................................................................................. 3 2.1. Spatial Mapping and Data Attributes ............................................................................................ 3 2.2. Document Review ......................................................................................................................... 4 3. Existing and Proposed Nature-Based Recreation and Educational Opportunities ....... 5 3.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Accomplishments Rivers to Ridges Partnership
    Photos: Cover, Suzanne Arlie Park Our Mission (P. Gordon); Back cover from left to right, top to bottom: Red-breasted The Rivers to Ridges (R2R) Partnership is dedicated to improving sapsucker (C. Kerst); Gray hairstreak the quality of life for residents in the upper Willamette Valley (R. Newman); Gillespie Butte (City of Eugene); Mussel survey by working together to protect and enhance the region’s land and water boats at Elijah Bristow State Park resources and their ecosystem functions and values; and to provide (MFWWC); Deltoid balsamroot (E. Alverson), Wetland visit in west environmental education and compatible outdoor recreation opportunities. Eugene (WREN), McKenzie River (T. Giraudier), Sunset from Spencer Butte (J. Krueger). Rivers to Ridges Partnership Vision Refresh Process to Begin in 2020 At its December 2019 annual meeting, the R2R Executive Team agreed to launch a vision “refresh” process which will be implemented starting in 2020 with 2019 a target completion date of 2022 (twenty year anniversary of R2R). This two phase effort will initially work with Accomplishments partner organizations to evaluate a much broader regional geography. The second phase will focus on updating the 2003 R2R vision map and will involve a robust public Miles of Trail process that will celebrate twenty years of or Path Built accomplishment and shape the vision for the next twenty years. Acres of Acres of 2.4 Habitat Land Protected Partner Restored Organizations • City of Eugene Number of 2,024 • Coast Fork Willamette Watershed Council 452 • Friends of Buford Park & Mount Pisgah Plants Planted • Lane County Public Works Department • Long Tom Watershed Council • McKenzie River Trust •McKenzie Watershed Council Participants 499,280 •Middle Fork Willamette Watershed Council To Learn More Volunteer •Mount Pisgah Arboretum in Outreach and Hours • Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife • Oregon Parks and Recreation Department rivers2ridges.org Educational Events • The Nature Conservancy Pounds of • U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Court of Appeals of the State of Oregon Olivia
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON OLIVIA CHERNAIK, a minor and resident of Lane County, Oregon; LISA CHERNAIK, Lane County Circuit Court guardian of Olivia Chernaik; KELSEY Case No. 16-11-09273 CASCADIA ROSE JULIANA, a minor and resident of Lane County, Oregon; and CATIA JULIANA, guardian of Kelsey CA No. A151856 Juliana, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. JOHN KITZHABER, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Oregon; and the STATE OF OREGON, Defendants-Respondents. BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE KITTY PIERCY, MAYOR OF EUGENE; PETE SORENSON, ROB HANDY, SHAWN BOLES, SASHA LUFTIG, JESSICA BLOOMFIELD, HOWARD BONNETT, DAWN LESLEY, DAVE FUNK, KATHI JAWORSKI, SUE WOLLING, ARTEMIO PAZ JR., MARTIN DONOHOE, AND HARPER KEELER, INDIVIDUALLY; WILLAMETTE FARM AND FOOD COALITION; NORTHWEST CENTER FOR ALTERNATIVES TO PESTICIDES; CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY; EUGENE LOCAL FOODS; KID FOOD MATTERS; CLIMATE SOLUTIONS; NATIVE AMERICAN STUDENT UNION AT THE UNIVERSITY OF OREGON; PARTNERS FOR SUSTAINABLE SCHOOLS; SUSTAINABLE OREGON SCHOOLS INITIATIVE; SUNDANCE NATURAL FOODS; FALLING SKY BREWERY; SEQUENTIAL BIOFUELS; MOUNT PISGAH ARBORETUM; NATIVE AMERICAN LAW STUDENTS ASSOCIATION-UNIVERSITY OF OREGON CHAPTER; AND WITNESS December 17, 2012 Appeal from Judgment of the Circuit Court for Lane County by the Honorable Karsten H. Rasmussen, Judge. Elisabeth A. Holmes, Tanya M. Sanerib, OSB No. 120254 OSB No. 025526 (415) 826-2770 (503) 525-2722 [email protected] [email protected] Center for Food Safety Christopher Winter, 303 Sacramento Street, 2nd Floor OSB No. 984355 San Francisco, CA 94111 (503) 525-2725 -and- [email protected] 917 SW Oak Street, Suite 300 CRAG LAW CENTER Portland, OR 97205 917 SW Oak Street, Suite 417 Portland, OR 97205 Counsel for Applicants and Proposed Amici Curiae William H.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Abstracts Links to Presentation & Poster Pdf’S Included
    CONFERENCE ABSTRACTS LINKS TO PRESENTATION & POSTER PDF’S INCLUDED Abstracts are arranged in alphabetical order by presenter author’s last name. Oral and poster abstracts included, and the title links to a PDF when available. CPOP 2018 Conference Abstracts & Presentations | 1 ABSTRACTS POSTER NOT JUST A RESOURCE, BUT AN HEIRLOOM: RESTORATION OF OAK SAVANNA IN THE COLUMBIA RIVER FLOODPLAIN. Karen Adams and Kelley Jorgensen, Wapato Valley Mitigation and Conservation Bank, 33415 NW Lancaster Road, Ridgefield, WA, 98642. [email protected] Oregon White Oak (Quercus garryana) habitats are well documented in the Willamette Valley/Puget Trough ecoregion, however they are generally associated with upland sites. Less attention has been given to culturally important oak savanna and associated wet prairie habitats found in the tidally influenced floodplain of the Lower Columbia River (LCR). Remnants of low elevation Oregon white oak habitat are scattered across the floodplain from Vancouver, WA to the Cowlitz River. Disturbance regimes driven by flood, fire, and Native American land use no longer shape the landscape. Oak savanna habitats in the floodplain that have not been converted to agriculture are shifting to woodland, and are only identifiable by savanna form oaks surrounded by forest species. Wapato Valley Mitigation and Conservation Bank (Wapato Valley) is being developed as a mechanism to protect the legacy of environmental stewardship for future family generations. The objective of this research was to understand ecological drivers of oak distribution across tidally influenced floodplains to increase the success of oak savanna restoration at Wapato Valley. Biologists collected data on the elevation, location, hydrologic regime, stand structure and plant community, and conducted a thorough literature review.
    [Show full text]
  • Rivers to Ridges Annual Report 2020 Section 1: Rivers to Ridges Partnership Background and Overview
    Rivers to Ridges Annual Report 2020 Section 1: Rivers to Ridges Partnership Background and Overview .............................................1 White oak on Mount Pisgah 1.1 The Rivers to Ridges Partnership .................................................................................................................................1 Photo credit: MPA 1.1.1 Vision Statement ............................................................................................................................................1 1.1.2 Vision Refinements .........................................................................................................................................1 1.2 Rivers to Ridges Online ...............................................................................................................................................2 1.3 Rivers to Ridges Annual Report and Accomplishments Reporting ..............................................................................2 1.4 Rivers to Ridges “Refresh” Process Underway ............................................................................................................2 1.5 Partnership Accomplishments By The Numbers .........................................................................................................3 Section 2: Land Protection ..........................................................................................................4 2.1 Land Protection in 2020 ..............................................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Lane Parks Large Event Task Force March 11, 2015 Ellen Otani, P. 1 of 2
    Lane Parks Large Event Task Force March 11, 2015 Ellen Otani, p. 1 of 2 Parks are not just random pieces of property and park planning should not occur in a vacuum. This is a list of regional and statewide visions that form a relevant context for considering questions about large events in Lane County Parks. Howard Buford Recreation Area (HBRA): 1. Oregon Conservation Strategy is "a blueprint for conservation of the state's native fish & wildlife and their habitats." (2006) www.dfw.state.or.usj conservationstrategyI Prepared by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife · WV-30A Mt. Pisgah area- conservation opportunity area . ... ViiV-CJ3vUilittl?le,f"~-e. t~i.ve,- Pioc',jl'lAivt- ·l?r"'l\ 0c)u+h c.\ SpL-t"-~f,etd \1-t' 2. Willamette River Open Space Vision and Action Plan "is intended to provide an inspirational view of how the diverse open space network that lines the Willamette River and its tributaries ... can be enhanced ... "(2010) (see map) www.lcog.org/willamette Participants include LCOG (Lane Council of Governments), TNC (The Nature Conservancy), Eugene, Springfield, Willamalane Parks and Recreation, Metropolitan Waste Management Commission, Willamette Riverkeeper, McKenzie, Coast Fork, Middle Fork, and Long Tom Watershed Councils, Oregon Parks and Recreation, OD FW (Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife), 3. Rivers to Ridges - Metropolitan Regional Parks and Open Space Study "is dedicated to improving the quality of life for residents of the upper Wilamette Valley by working together to protect and enhance the region's land and water resources and their ecosystem functions and values .
    [Show full text]