The Human Body in the Theology of Martin Luther

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Human Body in the Theology of Martin Luther Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Dissertations, Theses, and Professional Dissertations (1934 -) Projects "Poor Maggot-Sack that I Am": The Human Body in the Theology of Martin Luther Charles Lloyd Cortright Marquette University Follow this and additional works at: https://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu Part of the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Cortright, Charles Lloyd, ""Poor Maggot-Sack that I Am": The Human Body in the Theology of Martin Luther" (2011). Dissertations (1934 -). 102. https://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu/102 ―POOR MAGGOT SACK THAT I AM‖: THE HUMAN BODY IN THE THEOLOGY OF MARTIN LUTHER by The Rev. Charles L. Cortright, B.A., M.Div. A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Milwaukee, Wisconsin May 2011 ABSTRACT ―POOR MAGGOT SACK THAT I AM‖: THE HUMAN BODY IN THE THEOLOGY OF MARTIN LUTHER The Rev. Charles L. Cortright, B.A., M.Div. Marquette University, 2011 This dissertation represents research into the writings of Martin Luther [1483- 1546] reflecting his understanding of the human body in his theology. Chapter one reviews the history of the body in the theology of the western Christian church, 300- 1500. Chapters two through five examine Luther‘s thinking about various ―body topics,‖ such as the body as the good creation of God; sexuality and procreation; and the body in illness, death, and resurrection. Chapter six presents conclusions. Luther‘s thinking is examined on the basis of consultation of the Weimarer Ausgabe and the ―American Edition‖ of Luther‘s works. Special attention is given to Luther‘s interpretation of Genesis 1 and 2, to his writings on marriage and celibacy, and his sermons and letters. Various entries in the Tischreden pertinent to the subject are also examined. In contrast to the kinds of ―body topics‖ currently debated and discussed, Luther‘s concern was with the body that dies and yet will be raised again. In addressing issues concerning the body this research shows that, in general, Luther remained a medieval Catholic thinker about the body. However, he was distinct from many medieval voices in the way he affirmed the goodness of human sexuality as a created capacity and purpose of the male and female body. While he was sharp in his critique of sexual sins, this examination of Luther does not discover in him a ―grim negativity‖ about sexuality that some have suggested. Luther viewed sexuality-after-the-fall as he did every other aspect of human activity: infected by sin, but redeemed in Christ. Luther‘s thinking was informed by Scripture, but directed often by experience. Thus this research also traces the impact of his many illnesses, his marriage to Katherina von Bora, and the experience of the deaths of his parents and daughter on his theologizing. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Rev. Charles L. Cortright, B.A., M.Div. A page like this that falls under the eye of a reader unassociated with the project may seem similar to the kinds of breathy speeches given by Hollywood award recipients upon receiving their award. Having labored at this project, however, my perspective as the author compels me to say thank-you—whatever the perception—in the profoundest way I can to a number of people who have helped and supported me in this project, and to whom I am deeply grateful. As I think back over this project, my thanks are due to my colleague and friend, the Rev. Dr. Paul Lehninger—himself a Marquette graduate—who first set me on the track of proposing a dissertation topic on ―Luther and the body.‖ In addition, I want to express my sincere appreciation and thanks to the members of my committee—Dr. Deirdre Dempsey, Dr. Ulrich Lehner, Dr. Susan Wood, SCL, and Dr. Wanda Zemler- Cizewski—who patiently waited for this project to be completed and who have always been encouraging while it was being written. My special thanks are given to Dr. Mickey L. Mattox who has served as my dissertation director, but especially as a mentor and benevolissimus auctor throughout my coursework at Marquette and while dissertating. I am only being honest to say I could not have done this without his guidance and assistance. He has my sincere thanks, admiration, and respect for his scholarship and teaching—a true Doktorvater. ii Finally, Luther liked to call his wife Katherina his ―Rib (costa),‖ and regarded her in very biblical terms as the Helper God gave specially to him. Anyone who becomes involved in Luther‘s biography quickly sees the genuine love and esteem he grew to have for her and she for him. Luther‘s Katie is my Connie, my wife and closest friend, whose love, encouragement, and support are behind every success I have had: ―You are all my reasons.‖ In gratitude to my mother, Marian, and in loving memory of my father, + Kenneth B. Cortright + Nos fecisti ad Te et inquietum est cor nostrum donec requiescat in Te. -St. Augustine iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS…………………………………………………………………i ABBREVIATIONS………………………………………………………………………vi CHAPTER INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………...1 METHOD…………………………………………………………………...7 STRUCTURE……………………………………………………………….10 1. THE HUMAN BODY IN THE THEOLOGY OF THE LATIN WEST, 300-1500………………………………………………………………...12 1.1- THE BODY AS ―PROBLEM‖ TO THE SOUL: PLATONISM…...………….13 1.2- THE BODY AS FOIL TO THE SOUL: AUGUSTINE………………………18 1.3- THE EARLY MIDDLE AGES: 500-1200……………………………….29 1.4- THE BODY AS HUMAN CONDITION: ARISTOTELIANISM AND AQUINAS…………………………………………………………….34 1.5- THE FOURTEENTH AND FIFTEENTH CENTURIES……………………...45 1.6- THE MEDIEVAL LEGACY OF THE BODY……………………………...51 2. ―AM ANFANG SCHUFF GOTT HYMEL VND ERDEN‖………………...53 2.1- LUTHER AND CREATIO EX NIHILO…………………………………….56 2.2- CREATION IN TIME THROUGH THE WORD…………………………….66 2.3- ―TO CREATE IS ALWAYS TO MAKE NEW‖…………………………...76 2.4- WHAT ABOUT THE BODY?..................................................................85 iv 3. ―ER SCHUFF SIE EYN MENLIN UND FREWLIN‖ – LUTHER ON THE CREATED BODY…………………………………………………….88 3.1- THE ―EARLY‖ LUTHER AND GENESIS…………………………….….90 3.2- THE SCHOLIA………………………………………………………...91 3.3- THE DECLAMATIONES OF 1527……………………………………….94 3.3.1- GOD MADE THEM MALE AND FEMALE…………………….96 3.3.2- MAN BECAME A ―LIVING SOUL‖…………………………101 3.3.3- GENESIS 2: ENTER EVE…………………………………...104 3.3.4- SUMMA SUMMARUM……………………………………...112 3.4- THE ―LATER‖ LUTHER AND THE BODY IN GENESIS 1-2…………….116 3.4.1- GENESIS 1:26-28…………………………………………117 3.4.2- GENESIS 2:7: ―AND SO THE LORD GOD FORMED MAN FROM THE DUST‖…………………………………………...123 3.4.3- GENESIS 2:18-25…………………………………………125 3.4.4- SUMMA SUMMARUM……………………………………...130 4. ―ES IST NICHT GUT DAS DER MENSCH ALLEYN SEY‖ – LUTHER, THE BODY, AND SEXUALITY………………………………………134 4.1- LUTHER‘S REFORMATION WRITINGS ON THE QUESTION OF MONASTIC VOWS AND MARRIAGE, 1520-1525…………………………136 4.1.1- LUTHER‘S WRITINGS AGAINST MONASTIC VOWS………...137 4.1.2- THE SERMON ON THE ESTATE OF MARRIAGE, 1519; VOM EHELICHEN LEBEN, 1522…………………………………...143 4.1.3- THE COMMENTARY ON 1 CORINTHIANS 7, 1523………….148 4.2- MARRIAGE, THE BODY, AND SEXUALITY…………………………...151 4.2.1- THE SEX DRIVE: ―SEX IS GOOD‖…………………………153 4.2.2- THE SEX DRIVE: ―SEX ALWAYS INCLUDES SIN‖…………160 v 4.3- CHILDREN, THE FRUIT OF THE BODY……………………………….171 5. ―WENN ICH DIESEN MADEN SACK ABLEGEN SOL‖ – THE BODY, MORTALITY, AND RESURRECTION……………………….179 5.1- LUTHER AND HIS BODY…………………………………………….181 5.1.1- LUTHER IN SICKNESS……………………………………..186 5.1.2- LUTHER ON SICKNESS……………………...……………..203 5.2- ―POOR MAGGOT SACK THAT I AM‖………………………………...216 5.3- THE BODY AND DEATH……………………………………………..220 5.4- ―THERE IS A RESURRECTION OF THE FLESH!‖………………………229 5.4.1- SERMONS XII AND XIII: 1 CORINTHIANS 15:35-38………233 5.4.2- SERMON XIV: 1 CORINTHIANS 15:39-42…………………236 6. CONCLUSIONS…………………………………………………………...241 BIBLIOGRAPHY………………………………………………………………252 vi ABBREVIATIONS CCSL Corpus Christianorum, Series Latina. 176 vols. Turnhout: Brepols, 1953. CSEL Corpus Scriptorum Ecclesiasticorum Latinorum. 85 vols. Vienna, 1866—. LW Luther‘s Works. American Edition. 55 vols. Edited by Jaroslav Pelikan and Helmut Lehmann. Philadelphia and St. Louis: Fortress Press and Concordia, 1955—. ST Summa Theologiae. Blackfriars: New York: McGraw-Hill, 1964. WA D. Martin Luthers Werke: Kritische Gesamtausgabe. Schriften. 64 vols. Weimar: Böhlau, 1883—. WABr D. Martin Luthers Werke: Kritische Gesamtausgabe. Briefwechsel. 18 vols. Weimar: Böhlau, 1930-1985. WADB D. Martin Luthers Werke: Kritische Gesamtausgabe. Deutsche Bibel. 12 vols. Weimar: Böhlau, 1906-1961. WATr D. Martin Luthers Werke: Kritische Gesamtausgabe. Tischreden. 6 vols. Weimar: Böhlau, 1930-1985. 1 INTRODUCTION On 19 October 1512, Father Martin Luther of the Augustinian Eremites (OESA) took the oath required of a doctor of theology in the fledgling University of Wittenberg. Luther had been picked for the position of Lectura in Biblia by the man he would be replacing and who was also his spiritual mentor, the Augustinian Vicar-General Johann von Staupitz [1460-1524].1 As a doctor of theology and a professor—a position in which he continued to the end of his life—Luther was charged with presenting regular lectures to students on the Holy Scriptures, supervising theological disputations, and tending to the variety of other duties incumbent on a member of the university‘s theological faculty.2 Professor Luther was going to be a busy man: his academic duties came in addition to his responsibilities as the designated Prediger for his monastic house (1511), his service as subprior of his order in charge of eleven monastic houses in Saxony and 1 For the relationship between Luther and Staupitz see Martin Brecht, Martin Luther: His Road to Reformation, 1483-1521, trans. James L. Schaaf, (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1985), 54-55; Heiko A. Oberman, Luther: Man between God and the Devil, trans. Eileen Walliser-Schwarzbart, (Yale University Press, 1989), 131-152.
Recommended publications
  • The Trichotomy of Processes: a Philosophical Basis for Information Systems
    Association for Information Systems AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) Americas Conference on Information Systems AMCIS 2003 Proceedings (AMCIS) December 2003 The rT ichotomy of Processes: A Philosophical Basis for Information Systems George Widmeyer University of Michigan Follow this and additional works at: http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2003 Recommended Citation Widmeyer, George, "The rT ichotomy of Processes: A Philosophical Basis for Information Systems" (2003). AMCIS 2003 Proceedings. 362. http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2003/362 This material is brought to you by the Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS) at AIS Electronic Library (AISeL). It has been accepted for inclusion in AMCIS 2003 Proceedings by an authorized administrator of AIS Electronic Library (AISeL). For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE TRICHOTOMY OF PROCESSES: A PHILOSOPHICAL BASIS FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS George R. Widmeyer University of Michigan [email protected] Abstract The principle of trichotomy from the American philosopher Charles S. Peirce can be used to categorize processes into the triad of transactional, informational, and relational. The usefulness of these categories is explicated by a comparison with structuration theory and control theory, and elaborated with a consideration of democracy in a knowledge economy. These three example applications of the process triad show the generality of the conceptual categories and provide a natural way of bringing ideas from social and ethical theories into information systems design. Modeling the world and understanding business applications through the use of the Trichotomy of Processes should facilitate the development of more valuable information systems. Keywords: Business processes, information systems theory, conceptual modeling, ontology, Peirce, open society Introduction Various frameworks for understanding the business processes of an organization have been proposed.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Human Sexuality in John Paul II's Theology of the Body
    Duquesne University Duquesne Scholarship Collection Electronic Theses and Dissertations Spring 5-6-2016 Understanding Human Sexuality in John Paul II’s Theology of the Body: An Analysis of the Historical Development of Doctrine in the Catholic Tradition John Segun Odeyemi Follow this and additional works at: https://dsc.duq.edu/etd Recommended Citation Odeyemi, J. (2016). Understanding Human Sexuality in John Paul II’s Theology of the Body: An Analysis of the Historical Development of Doctrine in the Catholic Tradition (Doctoral dissertation, Duquesne University). Retrieved from https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/1548 This One-year Embargo is brought to you for free and open access by Duquesne Scholarship Collection. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Duquesne Scholarship Collection. UNDERSTANDING HUMAN SEXUALITY IN JOHN PAUL II’S THEOLOGY OF THE BODY: AN ANALYSIS OF THE HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF DOCTRINE IN THE CATHOLIC TRADITION. A Dissertation Submitted to Duquesne University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By John Segun Odeyemi May 2016 Copyright by John Segun Odeyemi 2016 UNDERSTANDING HUMAN SEXUALITY IN JOHN PAUL II’S THEOLOGY OF THE BODY: AN ANALYSIS OF THE HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF DOCTRINE IN THE CATHOLIC TRADITION. By John Segun Odeyemi Approved on March 31, 2016 _______________________________ __________________________ Prof. George S. Worgul Jr. S.T.D., Ph.D. Dr. Elizabeth Cochran Professor of Theology Associate Professor of Theology (Dissertation Director) (Committee Member) ________________________________ ________________________________ Rev. Dr. Gregory I. Olikenyen C.S.Sp. Dr. James Swindal Assistant Professor of Theology Dean, McAnulty College and Graduate (Committee Member) School of Liberal Arts iii DEDICATION In honor of my dearly beloved parents on the 50th anniversary of their marriage, (October 30th, 1965 – October 30th 2015) Richard Tunji and Agnes Morolayo Odeyemi.
    [Show full text]
  • Kant on Recognizing Our Duties As God's Commands
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Asbury Theological Seminary Faith and Philosophy: Journal of the Society of Christian Philosophers Volume 17 Issue 4 Article 3 10-1-2000 Kant on Recognizing our Duties as God's Commands John Hare Follow this and additional works at: https://place.asburyseminary.edu/faithandphilosophy Recommended Citation Hare, John (2000) "Kant on Recognizing our Duties as God's Commands," Faith and Philosophy: Journal of the Society of Christian Philosophers: Vol. 17 : Iss. 4 , Article 3. Available at: https://place.asburyseminary.edu/faithandphilosophy/vol17/iss4/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at ePLACE: preserving, learning, and creative exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faith and Philosophy: Journal of the Society of Christian Philosophers by an authorized editor of ePLACE: preserving, learning, and creative exchange. KANT ON RECOGNIZING OUR DUTIES AS GOD'S COMMANDS John E. Hare Kant both says that we should recognize our duties as God's commands, and objects to the theological version of heteronomy, 'which derives morality from a divine and supremely perfect will'. In this paper I discuss how these two views fit together, and in the process I develop a notion of autonomous submission to divine moral authority. I oppose the 'constitutive' view of autonomy proposed by J. B. Schneewind and Christine Korsgaard. I locate Kant's objection to theological heteronomy against the background of Crusius's divine command theory, and I compare Kant's views about divine authority and human political authority. 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Transcendental Philosophy 2020; 1(3): 307–312
    Journal of Transcendental Philosophy 2020; 1(3): 307–312 Book Review Huaping Lu-Adler. Kant and the Science of Logic: A Historical and Philosophical Reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2018. Reviewed by Stephen Palmquist, Department of Religion & Philosophy, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon, Hong Kong, E-mail: [email protected] https://doi.org/10.1515/jtph-2020-0021 Notwithstanding its title, this book is not about the science called “logic”—at least, not insofar as “science of logic” refers to the rules, procedures, and guiding principles that constitute the laws of thought. While Huaping Lu-Adler often refers in passing to logical operations such as syllogisms, she never discusses their rules of operation. She does mention the law/principle of (non)contradiction eight times and that of identity once (p. 14); yet these all appear in quotes or side-comments. (She never mentions the law of excluded middle.) Similarly, she limits her treat- ment of potentially relevant post-Kantian developments in logic to a few brief glosses on Boole and Frege (pp. 3, 195–7), without referring to propositional logic, fuzzy logic, dialetheism, etc. However, this is all by design, so prepared readers need not be surprised by such omissions. Indeed, as the author announces in the Introduction and repeatedly reminds her readers, the book’s focus is on “the philosophy of logic” (pp. 3–4), not on the mechanics of how logical relations as such actually function. The Introduction acknowledges that historians of logic have typically either defined logic narrowly and therefore found nothing new—and thus little worth writing about—in Kant and other Enlightenment philosophers, or else they have followed Kant’s immediate predecessors by defining logic in a broader sense than we do nowadays and have therefore written voluminously on the views of “logic” advanced during this period, but in ways that relate very little to modern con- ceptions of logic.
    [Show full text]
  • Concordia Theological Quarterly
    CONCORDIA THEOLOGICAL QUARTERLY Volume 83:3–4 July/October 2019 Table of Contents After Canons, Councils, and Popes: The Implications of Luther’s Leipzig Debate for Lutheran Ecclesiology Richard J. Serina Jr. ...................................................................................... 195 The Leipzig Debate and Theological Method Roland F. Ziegler .......................................................................................... 213 Luther and Liberalism: A Tale of Two Tales (Or, A Lutheran Showdown Worth Having) Korey D. Maas .............................................................................................. 229 Scripture as Philosophy in Origen’s Contra Celsum Adam C. Koontz ........................................................................................... 237 Passion and Persecution in the Gospels Peter J. Scaer .................................................................................................. 251 Reclaiming Moral Reasoning: Wisdom as the Scriptural Conception of Natural Law Gifford A. Grobien ....................................................................................... 267 Anthropology: A Brief Discourse David P. Scaer ............................................................................................... 287 Reclaiming the Easter Vigil and Reclaiming Our Real Story Randy K. Asburry ......................................................................................... 325 Theological Observer ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Martin Luther
    TRUTHmatters October 2002 Volume II, Issue 4 ous errors of John Wycliffe who said ‘It is not MARTIN LUTHER necessary for salvation to believe that the Ro- (This is the second of two articles) man Church is above all others.’ And you are espousing the pestilent errors of John Hus, We shift now to Luther’s work in the who claimed that Peter neither was nor is the following two to three years. It has already been head of the Holy Catholic Church.” mentioned that he was catapulted into the fore- This was dangerous ground for Luther ground and the next two or three years were to be on because John Hus had been burned as both hard and rewarding to the Augustinian a heretic and if Luther could be forced into this monk. I will only cover two of these most im- stand, he could also be called a heretic. A portant events. The Leipzig Debate in July of lunch break was due and during this break Lu- 1519 and the famous Diet of Worms in 1521. ther went to the library and quickly looked up The Leipzig debate was held in the large what Hus had believed and found that it was hall of the Castle of Pleissenberg at Leipzig. The exactly what he believed. In the afternoon ses- debate was between Johann Eck who repre- sion, Luther astonished the whole assembly by sented the Roman church and Dr. Carlstadt and declaring in effect: “Ja, Ich bin ein Hussite” or Dr. Martin Luther. It was a great intellectual “Yes, I am a Hussite.” It is from this debate battle that lasted three weeks.
    [Show full text]
  • Paratext in Bible Translations with Special Reference to Selected Bible Translations Into Beninese Languages
    DigitalResources SIL eBook 58 ® Paratext in Bible Translations with Special Reference to Selected Bible Translations into Beninese Languages Geerhard Kloppenburg Paratext in Bible Translations with Special Reference to Selected Bible Translations into Beninese Languages Geerhard Kloppenburg SIL International® 2013 SIL e-Books 58 2013 SIL International® ISSN: 1934-2470 Fair-Use Policy: Books published in the SIL e-Books (SILEB) series are intended for scholarly research and educational use. You may make copies of these publications for research or instructional purposes free of charge (within fair-use guidelines) and without further permission. Republication or commercial use of SILEB or the documents contained therein is expressly prohibited without the written consent of the copyright holder(s). Editor-in-Chief Mike Cahill Compositor Margaret González VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT AMSTERDAM PARATEXT IN BIBLE TRANSLATIONS WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO SELECTED BIBLE TRANSLATIONS INTO BENINESE LANGUAGES THESIS MASTER IN LINGUISTICS (BIBLE TRANSLATION) THESIS ADVISOR: DR. L.J. DE VRIES GEERHARD KLOPPENBURG 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................. 3 1.1 The phenomenon of paratext............................................................................................ 3 1.2 The purpose of this study ................................................................................................. 5 2. PARATEXT: DEFINITION AND DESCRIPTION.............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Additional Resource List
    ________________________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL RESOURCE LIST ARCHDIOCESAN OFFERINGS FOR THE VICTIM/SURVIVORS OF SEXUAL ABUSE Victim/Survivor Support Group for those who were Adults when they were Sexually Harmed by Clergy or by anyone else First Monday of the month 6:30 – 8 p.m. Central Online via ZOOM If you are interested in participating in this virtual/online session, please contact Paula Kaempffer (651-291-4429 or [email protected]) to obtain the ZOOM invitation. Join with others who were sexually abused by clergy when they were adults. There are others who share a similar experience and who want to provide support, affirmation, hope and empowerment. Often there is another layer of healing that is needed for these victim/survivors. This group is about providing a safe, confidential environment for those who want to heal from the trauma of sexual abuse. We can help in our own healing and benefit from the experience of others in accomplishing this. Victim/Survivor Support Group Third Monday of the month 6:30 – 8 p.m. Central Online via ZOOM If you are interested in participating in this virtual/online session, please contact Paula Kaempffer (651-291-4429 or [email protected]) to obtain the ZOOM invitation. Join with other victim/survivors of sexual abuse who share a similar experience and who want to provide each other with support, affirmation, hope and empowerment. Support Group for Men who have been Sexually Abused by Clergy/Religious Fourth Wednesday of each month 6:30 – 8 p.m. Central Online via ZOOM Join each monthly meeting at this link.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissertation Body Text FINAL SUBMISSION VERSION
    UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Openness to the Development of the Relationship: A Theory of Close Relationships Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2030n6jk Author Page, Emily Publication Date 2021 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Openness to the Development of the Relationship: A Theory of Close Relationships A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Philosophy by Emily Page 2021 © Copyright by Emily Page 2021 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Openness to the Development of the Relationship: A Theory of Close Relationships by Emily Page Doctor of Philosophy in Philosophy University of California, Los Angeles, 2021 Professor Alexander Jacob Julius, Chair In a word, this dissertation is about friendship. I begin by raising a problem related to one traditionally found within some of the philosophical literature regarding moral egalitarianism: that of partiality and friendship, except that I raise the issue of partiality within the context of one’s close relationships. From here I propose a solution to the problem based on understanding a close relationship as one in which friends possess the attitude of openness to the development of the relationship. The remainder of the dissertation is concerned with elaborating upon and explaining this conception of friendship and its consequences. In the course of doing this I propose a theory of the self and how we relate to one another, consider the importance of the psychophysical self, explore the notion of mutual recognition, reflect on relationship’s end, and, finally, explore the connections between friendship and play.
    [Show full text]
  • Kino in Coburg
    - 1 - Inhaltsverzeichnis Vorwort ................................... 3 Kinematografische Treffpunkte in Coburg ... 4 Premieren im Union-Theater ............... 10 Margarethe Birnbaum ...................... 12 Luther - Der Film (2002) ................. 14 Weitere in Coburg gedrehte Filme ......... 16 Karrierestart Coburg ..................... 18 Der Flieger (1986) ...................... 21 Rubinrot / Saphirblau .................... 22 Interview Michael Böhm ................... 25 Gästebuch Goldene Traube ................. 27 Das kleine Hofkonzert .................... 29 Jürgen A. Brückner ....................... 30 Michael Ballhaus ......................... 32 Michael Verhoeven ........................ 33 Premiere „Der blaue Strohhut“ ............ 34 Annette Hopfenmüller ...................... 36 Filmkontor Graf .......................... 37 Himmel ohne Sterne ....................... 38 Der letzte Vorhang ....................... 40 Der Abriss / Der Neubau .................. 42 Drehort Coburg · Filmkulisse Coburg ...... 44 Beruf im Wandel: Filmvorführer ........... 46 Danksagung / Impressum ................... 47 Liebe Leserinnen, liebe Leser, mit meinem Jahrgang 1968 gehöre So sahen wir den ganzen „Krieg der ich zu der Generation, die mit Sterne“-Film, von dem ein Teil mei- einem Schwarz-Weiß-Fernseher mit ner Freunde begeistert erzählt hatte. vier Programmen und ohne Fern- Mich hat dieser Film nicht beson- bedienung aufgewachsen ist. Der ders beeindruckt und ich konnte die Besuch eines Kinos war dagegen Begeisterung meiner Freunde nicht
    [Show full text]
  • HAVE GERMAN WILL TRAVEL Martin Luther
    HAVE GERMAN WILL TRAVEL Martin Luther Martin Luther (der 10. November 1483-der 2. Februar 1546) Wartburg Festung bei Eisenach / Wartburg Fortress In this work, one of his most emphatic statements on faith, he argued that every good work designed to attract God's favor is a sinP3l All humans are sinners by nature, he explained, and God's grace (which cannot be earned) alone can make them just. On 1 August 1521, Luther wrote to Melanchthon on the same theme: "Be a sinner, and let your sins be strong, but let your trust in Christ be stronger, and rejoice in Christ who is the victor over sin, death, and the world. We will commit sins while we are here, for this life is not a place where justice resides."[741 In the summer of 1521, Luther widened his target from individual pieties like indulgences and pilgrimages to doctrines at the heart of Church practice. In On the Abrogation of the Private Mass, he condemned as idolatry the idea that the mass is a sacrifice, asserting instead that it is a gift, to be received with thanksgiving by the whole congregationF5l His essay On Confession, Whether the Pope has the Power to Require It rejected compulsory confession and encouraged private confession and absolution, since "every Christian is a confessor."[761 In November, Luther wrote The Judgement ofMartin Luther on Monastic Vows. He assured monks and nuns that they could break their vows without sin, because vows were an illegitimate and vain attempt to win salvation.l77l In 1521 Luther dealt largely with prophecy, in which he broadened the foundations of the Reformation, placing them on prophetic faith.
    [Show full text]
  • Whenever Someone Speaks of Martin Luther, Everyone Thinks Of
    Whenever someone speaks of The buildings in By 1519, Torgau’s Nikolai Four years later, the new Elector I sleep extremely Johann Walter compos- Martin Luther often preached in Even if I knew that tombstone we can see the image of Making a sad and Martin Luther, everyone thinks of Torgau are more Church was the scene of the John Frederick the Magnanimous, well, about 6 or 7 ed a motet for seven the town church of St. Mary’s, and tomorrow the world a self-confident, strong woman. despondent man Wittenberg, still many others think beautiful than any first baptism in the German who had succeeded his father John hours in a row, and voices for the consecra- altogether more than forty times would go to pieces, It is also worth visiting the house happy again, of Wartburg Castle, but only sel- from ancient times, language. One year later, Ger- in 1532, passed an edict to protect later again 2 or 3 tion. As a close friend of of a stay in Torgau can be verified. I would still plant my Katharinenstrasse 11, where you this is more than to dom of Worms. Even Eisleben and even King Solomon’s man was first used in a Pro- the printing of the complete Bible in hours. I think it is Luther’s, he had already Thus the saying that “Wittenberg apple tree today. find a museum, which is comme- conquer a kingdom. Mansfeld, where the great Refor- temple was only built testant sermon. Wittenberg. He then gave orders to because of the beer, edited the first new song was the Mother of Reformation and morating the wife of the great Re- mer was born and where he died, of wood.
    [Show full text]