Public Transportation Safety Board Rail Accident Close out Form *******************************************************************************

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Public Transportation Safety Board Rail Accident Close out Form ******************************************************************************* PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD RAIL ACCIDENT CLOSE OUT FORM ******************************************************************************* 1. CASE NUMBER: 8322 2. PROPERTY NAME: MTA-Long Island Rail Road 3. CRITERIA CODE: CX 4. ACCIDENT DATE: December 16, 2004 (CHOICES CX-EV-PF) 5. LINE NAME: Far Rockaway Branch 6. LOCATION: West Broadway, Hewlett 7. NO. OF INJURIES: 0 8. NO OF FATALITIES: 0 9. ACCIDENT CODE: 52 (CHOOSE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING) 40-Track Maintenance. Deficiency 45-Human Failure-Improper Procedure 50-Fell From Train 41-Track Component Deficiency 46-Material On Track 51-Ignored Warning Devices 42-Equipment Maintenance.Defincency 47-Inconclusive 52-Unsafe Action 43-Equipment Component Def. 48-Loss Of Power 53-Mech. Failure/Other Vehicle 44-Human Factor/Equipment Operator 49-Fire or smoke 55-Drag Related 56-Non-Passenger Fatality 10. PROBABLE CAUSE: At approximately 2:50 p.m., on Thursday, December 16, 2004, the engineer of eastbound train #2854 reported striking an occupied vehicle which was stopped in the right traffic lane past the white stop line of the West Broadway grade crossing in Hewlett. The investigation determined that the operator stopped his vehicle in traffic and, when the gates activated for the approach of train #2854, failed to back up sufficiently to clear his vehicle from fouling the track. The engineer of the eight car train reported that he was traveling eastbound towards Far Rockaway Station on track #2 at approximately 27 mph when he observed the vehicle fouling the track at the crossing. The engineer further stated that he placed the train’s brakes in emergency, but was unable to stop in time. After striking the vehicle, the train came to rest approximately 300 feet north of Hewlett Station and the vehicle came to rest on the west side of the West Broadway crossing. The vehicle operator was reportedly shaken up, but refused medical aid. There were no injuries to the passengers or crew. The vehicle and LIRR operating car #7146 each sustained minor front end damage. There was no damage to the tracks or signal equipment. West Broadway is a four lane street with two traffic lanes in each direction. The crossing is protected by two sets of vehicle gates with bells and two sets of pedestrian gates. There is a painted white stop line on the roadway west of the crossing for vehicular traffic traveling eastbound. Weather conditions at the time of the accident were clear with a temperature of approximately 40 degrees and the road pavement was dry. Passengers remained on board the train during the police investigation and at approximately 3:43 p.m., the train was released by the police and continued eastbound into Hewlett Station where the passengers were discharged to await the following eastbound train. Post accident signal tests revealed that the crossing protection at West Broadway was operating as intended and was in compliance with all state and federal regulations. Police issued the vehicle operator a traffic summons for obstructing a railroad-highway grade crossing. The Public Transportation Safety Board staff finds that the most probable cause of this accident was the unsafe action of the vehicle operator stopping his vehicle beyond the painted white stop line at the railroad crossing and failing to recognize that the vehicle was still fouling the tracks after backing up. Based on the circumstances surrounding this accident, PTSB staff makes no recommendations. 11. DID THE PROPERTY CONTRIBUTE TO THIS ACCIDENT? NO 12. ARE THERE ANY RECOMMENDATIONS TO BE MADE? NO INVESTIGATOR: John L. Compitello DATE: January 3, 2005 SUBMITTAL The above case has been thoroughly investigated and meets all the conditions identified in PTSB Resolution #1220 and does not require a written report. Date: January 4, 2005 Jerry Shook, Director Rail Safety Bureau .
Recommended publications
  • August 15, 2009
    Metropolitan Transportation Authority Office of Legislative and Community Input Compilation of Concerns, Comments and Recommendations Pursuant to Chapter 25 of the Laws of 2009 June 1, 2009 through August 15, 2009 Name of Senate, Legislator's Response Agency Legislator's or Date Request/Concern/ Close Out Assembly Name (none if MTA Response or Proactive Notification or Briefing Delivered Tracking PCAC Contact Received Recommendation Expressed Date or PCAC PCAC) Via LIRR913 Assembly Sweeney, Robert 6/1/2009 Inquired about US Open Busing and Fare Policy Provided Information Telephone 6/1/09 NYCT0075 Senate Serrano, Jose M. 6/1/2009 Eight Avenue Line Emergency Ventilation Committee Meeting Letter 6/1/09 MTAHQ 1004 Assembly Scarborough, 6/1/2009 Requested briefing on paratransit contract. Concerned that in person 7/24/09 William the RFP that was issued by NYCT did not have any M/WBE NYCT and MTA staff met with Assemblyman and a constituent who was interested in goals potentially bidding on paratransit contract. Paratransit procurement process was reviewed. Agreed that there would be follow-up discussions with constituent to determine if there were other opportunities on which he may be qualified to bid. NYCT0127 Senate Padavan, Frank 6/1/2009 Weekend service diversion notice E-mail 6/1/09 NYCT0078 Assembly Glick, Deborah 6/1/2009 Eight Avenue Line Emergency Ventilation Community Meeting Letter 6/1/09 LIRR1092 Senate Fuschillo, Jr., Jr., 6/1/2009 Constituent concern re: Wantagh Station Information provided addressing parking at Wantagh Station Letter 7/9/09 Charles NYCT0061 Senate Duane, Thomas 6/1/2009 Eight Avenue Line Emergency Ventilation Community Meeting Letter 6/1/09 K.
    [Show full text]
  • Mta Property Listing for Nys Reporting
    3/31/2021 3:48 PM MTA PROPERTY LISTING FOR NYS REPORTING COUNTY SECTN BLOCKNO LOTNO Property_Code PROPERTYNAME PROPERTYADDDRESS AGENCY LINE PROPERTYTYPE limaster LIRR Customer Abstract Property LIRR Customer Abstract Property LIR Main Line Station Bronx bbl05200 Bronx Whitestone Bridge Hutchson River parkway BT Block/Lot Bridge Bronx 9 mha04650 ROW b 125th & Melrose XXX St MN Harlem ROW Bronx 9 mha06600 ROW b 125th & Melrose Milepost 5,Sta-Mon# 31.5 MN Harlem ROW Bronx 12 mha09500 FORDHAM STATION Fordham Rd (Fordham U) MN Harlem Station Bronx mhu00343 Perm E'ment at Yankee Stadium Sta-mon 30.5 MN Hudson Payable Easement Bronx mhu06251 Spuyten Duyvil Substation Sta-Mon# 68.5 MN Hudson Payable Easement Bronx 19 mhu06301 Parking at Riverdale Milepost 12 , Sta-Mon# 68.5 MN Hudson Parking Bronx tbl03600 Unionport Shop Unionport Rd. NYCT White Plains Road Shop Bronx tbl65340 Con Edison Ducts East 174 St NYCT Block/Lot Ducts Bronx tbw32500 231ST 231 St-Broadway NYCT Broadway/7th Avenue Station Bronx tbw32600 238 ST 238 St-Broadway NYCT Broadway/7th Avenue Station Bronx tbw32700 242 ST 242 St-Van Cortlandt Pk NYCT Broadway/7th Avenue Station Bronx tco21000 161 ST Yankee Stadium 161 St/River Ave NYCT Concourse Station Bronx tco21100 167 ST 167 St/Grand Concourse NYCT Concourse Station Bronx tco21200 170 ST 170 St/Grand Concourse NYCT Concourse Station Bronx tco21300 174 175 STs 174-175 Sts/Grand Concourse NYCT Concourse Station Bronx tco21400 TREMONT AVE Tremont Ave/Grand Concourse NYCT Concourse Station Bronx tco21500 182 183 STs 183 St/Grand
    [Show full text]
  • January 2010 Table of Contents
    Places to Grow An Analysis of the Potential for Transit-Accessible Housing and Jobs in Long Island’s Downtowns and Station Areas Report Prepared by Regional Plan Association January 2010 Table of Contents EXECUtiVE SUMMarY 2 Research Methodology 3 PART I: The Need for Housing and Jobs on Long Island 4 The Case for Transit-Accessible Housing 5 PART II: Where Can We Build It? 6 What Are Our Downtowns Like Today? 6 How Much Land Is Available in the Downtowns for Rebuilding? 8 Which Downtowns Have the Greatest Potential? 10 PART III. Case Studies 14 The Village of Mineola—Transforming a Regional Employment and Transportation Hub into a Mixed-Use Center 16 The Village of South Orange, New Jersey—Revitalizing a Downtown by Improving Public Transportation and Rebuilding a Station Area 18 Fairfax County, Virginia—Comprehensive Planning at the Regional Level 20 Conclusion: Where Do We Go From Here? 24 Rethinking Long Island’s Parking Lots—The Case of Freeport 24 Linking Local and Regional Visions 25 Appendix A: Population, Stores and Transit Ridership for Downtowns and Stations Areas 26 Appendix B: Acres of Unbuilt Land within a Half Mile of Downtown Centers and Stations 31 Appendix C: Station Areas Outside of Downtowns, Ranked by Ridership 36 Places to Grow :: 1 Places to Grow An Analysis of the Potential for Transit-Accessible Housing and Jobs in Long Island’s Downtowns and Station Areas EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Even in the midst of recession, Long Islanders continue to land mass. In sports terms, it is equal to 7,580 football fields. confront the question of what type of place the Island will In comparison to New York City, it is roughly equivalent become over the next generation.
    [Show full text]