Extracting Vibration Characteristics and Performing Sound Synthesis of Acoustic Guitar to Analyze Inharmonicity
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Science of String Instruments
The Science of String Instruments Thomas D. Rossing Editor The Science of String Instruments Editor Thomas D. Rossing Stanford University Center for Computer Research in Music and Acoustics (CCRMA) Stanford, CA 94302-8180, USA [email protected] ISBN 978-1-4419-7109-8 e-ISBN 978-1-4419-7110-4 DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-7110-4 Springer New York Dordrecht Heidelberg London # Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010 All rights reserved. This work may not be translated or copied in whole or in part without the written permission of the publisher (Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013, USA), except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis. Use in connection with any form of information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed is forbidden. The use in this publication of trade names, trademarks, service marks, and similar terms, even if they are not identified as such, is not to be taken as an expression of opinion as to whether or not they are subject to proprietary rights. Printed on acid-free paper Springer is part of Springer ScienceþBusiness Media (www.springer.com) Contents 1 Introduction............................................................... 1 Thomas D. Rossing 2 Plucked Strings ........................................................... 11 Thomas D. Rossing 3 Guitars and Lutes ........................................................ 19 Thomas D. Rossing and Graham Caldersmith 4 Portuguese Guitar ........................................................ 47 Octavio Inacio 5 Banjo ...................................................................... 59 James Rae 6 Mandolin Family Instruments........................................... 77 David J. Cohen and Thomas D. Rossing 7 Psalteries and Zithers .................................................... 99 Andres Peekna and Thomas D. -
Electric & Acoustic Guitar Strings: a Recording of Harmonic Content
Electric & Acoustic Guitar Strings: A Recording of Harmonic Content Ryan Lee, Graduate Researcher Electrical & Computer Engineering Department University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign In conjunction with Professor Steve Errede and the Department of Physics Friday, January 10, 2003 2 Introduction The purpose of this study was to analyze the harmonic content and decay of different guitar strings. Testing was done in two parts: 80 electric guitar strings and 145 acoustic guitar strings. The goal was to obtain data for as many different brands, types, and gauges of strings as possible. Testing Each string was tested only once, in brand new condition (unless otherwise noted). Once tuned properly, each string was plucked with a bare thumb in two different positions. For the electric guitar, the two positions were at the top of the bridge pickup and at the top of the neck pickup. For the acoustic guitar, the two positions were at the bottom of the sound hole and at the top of the sound hole. The signal path for the recording of an electric guitar string was as follows: 1994 Gibson SG Standard to ¼” input on a Mark of the Unicorn (MOTU) 896 to a computer (via firewire). Steinberg’s Cubase VST 5.0 was the software used to capture the .wav files. The 1999 Taylor 410CE acoustic guitar was recorded in an anechoic chamber. A Bruel & Kjær 4145 condenser microphone was connected directly to a Sony TCD-D8 portable DAT recorder (via its B&K preamp, power supply, and cables). Recording format was mono, 48 kHz, and 16- bit. -
Breedlove Owner's Manual
1 BREEDLOVE Owner’s MANUAL Breedlove Owner’s Manual TABLE OF CONTENTS A Note From Kim Breedlove 4 How To Experience Breedlove 7 Humidity, Temperature and Solid Wood Instruments 8 Neck Truss Rod Adjustment 10 Breedlove Bridge Truss 12 Adjustment Bolt Sizes for Breedlove Instruments 14 Steel-String Acoustic Guitar Set Up Specifications 15 Changing Strings on your Breedlove Guitar 16 Breedlove Mandolins 17 Electronics Configurations for Acoustic Guitars 19 Cleaning Your Breedlove Instrument 19 Breedlove Factory String Specifications 22 Breedlove Warranty 22 Keep a record of your Breedlove Guitar 25 5 THANK YOU Thank you for purchasing your new Breedlove instrument. You are now the caretaker of a fine stringed instrument. Every instrument we produce is special to us and we hope it will bring you many years of enjoyment. To preserve the remarkable tone and playability of your Breedlove we have some simple suggestions to help ensure that your instrument will be making beautiful music for years to come. Should you ever have questions or concerns please send us an email at: [email protected] Sincerely, Kim Breedlove 5 DISTINCTIVELY CRafted SOUND. We love what we do. After all, it’s in our name. We are master luthiers who create instruments of true distinction. It’s in our DNA to push the boundaries of design and craftsmanship. Being different is never the easy path. But in our view, it has far greater rewards. And while we respect tradition, we simply choose not to make instruments of yesterday. Imagination compels us to make instruments of tomorrow. 7 Welcome to the Breedlove family where you are about to experience the highest quality craftsmanship, customer service and an unmatched passion for music and fine instruments. -
Antonio Stradivari "Servais" 1701
32 ANTONIO STRADIVARI "SERVAIS" 1701 The renowned "Servais" cello by Stradivari is examined by Roger Hargrave Photographs: Stewart Pollens Research Assistance: Julie Reed Technical Assistance: Gary Sturm (Smithsonian Institute) In 184.6 an Englishman, James Smithson, gave the bines the grandeur of the pre‑1700 instrument with US Government $500,000 to be used `for the increase the more masculine build which we could wish to and diffusion of knowledge among men.' This was the have met with in the work of the master's earlier beginning of the vast institution which now domi - years. nates the down‑town Washington skyline. It includes the J.F. Kennedy Centre for Performing Arts and the Something of the cello's history is certainly worth National Zoo, as well as many specialist museums, de - repeating here, since, as is often the case, much of picting the achievements of men in every conceiv - this is only to be found in rare or expensive publica - able field. From the Pony Express to the Skylab tions. The following are extracts from the Reminis - orbital space station, from Sandro Botticelli to Jack - cences of a Fiddle Dealer by David Laurie, a Scottish son Pollock this must surely be the largest museum violin dealer, who was a contemporary of J.B. Vuil - and arts complex anywhere in the world. Looking laume: around, one cannot help feeling that this is the sort While attending one of M. Jansen's private con - of place where somebody might be disappointed not certs, I had the pleasure of meeting M. Servais of Hal, to find the odd Strad! And indeed, if you can manage one of the most renowned violoncellists of the day . -
An Exploration of Monophonic Instrument Classification Using Multi-Threaded Artificial Neural Networks
University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 12-2009 An Exploration of Monophonic Instrument Classification Using Multi-Threaded Artificial Neural Networks Marc Joseph Rubin University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Computer Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Rubin, Marc Joseph, "An Exploration of Monophonic Instrument Classification Using Multi-Threaded Artificial Neural Networks. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2009. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/555 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Marc Joseph Rubin entitled "An Exploration of Monophonic Instrument Classification Using Multi-Threaded Artificial Neural Networks." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Computer Science. Jens Gregor, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: James Plank, Bruce MacLennan Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Marc Joseph Rubin entitled “An Exploration of Monophonic Instrument Classification Using Multi-Threaded Artificial Neural Networks.” I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Computer Science. -
Journal of the Violin Society of America, Volume XVI, No
Journal of the Violin Society of America, Volume XVI, No. 2 Proceedings of the 25th Annual National Convention New Designs and Modern Violins Saturday, November 8, 1997, 2:00 pm Albert Mell: From early childhood Guy Rabut has been very much in- volved with art and drawing, and this interest has been maintained throughout his career. After working in the Français shop under René Morel for a number of years, Guy opened his own shop on 28th Street in Manhattan, where he is concerned primarily with making new instruments. If you are in New York Iʼm sure he would be glad to see you. Since 1995 Guy has been working on what seems to be a new face of the violin. These are violins which are built acoustically according to traditional methods, but incorporate new design ideas to create an aesthetic interest. I give you Guy Rabut. Guy Rabut: Good afternoon. I would like to thank Phil Kass and the VSA for inviting me to speak today. I attended my first VSA meeting in 1980 when it was at Hofstra University. I have been to several since, and have always enjoyed myself and learned a great deal. For several years I have been pursuing traditional violin making. But always in the back of my mind I wanted to expand the aesthetic envelope and try some new designs and ideas within the parameters of violin mak- ing. As they evolved, the ideas went from non-traditional decorations on a traditional playing instrument to completely new forms and surface treat- ments on the acoustic skeleton of the traditional violin. -
Overview Guitar Models
14.04.2011 HOHNER - HISTORICAL GUITAR MODELS page 1 [54] Image Category Model Name Year from-to Description former retail price Musima Resonata classical; beginners guitar; mahogany back and sides Acoustic 129 (730) ca. 1988 140 DM (1990) with celluloid binding; 19 frets Acoustic A EAGLE 2004 Top Wood: Spruce - Finish : Natural - Guitar Hardware: Grover Tuners BR CLASSIC CITY Acoustic 1999 Fingerboard: Rosewood - Pickup Configuration: H-H (BATON ROUGE) electro-acoustic; solid spruce top; striped ebony back and sides; maple w/ abalone binding; mahogany neck; solid ebony fingerboard and Acoustic CE 800 E 2007 bridge; Gold Grover 3-in-line tuners; shadow P7 pickup, 3-band EQ; single cutaway; colour: natural electro-acoustic; solid spruce top; striped ebony back and sides; maple Acoustic CE 800 S 2007 w/ abalone binding; mahogany neck; solid ebony fingerboard and bridge; Gold Grover 3-in-line tuners; single cutaway; colour: natural dreadnought western guitar; Gruhn design; 20 nickel silver frets; rosewood veneer on headstock; mahogany back and sides; spruce top, Acoustic D 1 ca. 1991 950 DM (1992) scalloped bracings; mahogany neck with rosewood fingerboard; satin finish; Gotoh die-cast machine heads dreadnought western guitar; Gruhn design; rosewood back and sides; spruce top, scalloped bracings; mahogany neck with rosewood Acoustic D 2 ca. 1991 1100 DM (1992) fingerboard; 20 nickel silver frets; rosewood veneer on headstock; satin finish; Gotoh die-cast machine heads Top Wood: Sitka Spruce - Back: Rosewood - Sides: Rosewood - Guitar Acoustic -
Separating Sound from Source: Sonic Transformation of the Violin Through Electrodynamic Pickups and Acoustic Actuation
Separating sound from source: sonic transformation of the violin through electrodynamic pickups and acoustic actuation Laurel S. Pardue Kurijn Buys Michael Edinger Design and Media Technology Centre for Digital Music MusikLab.dk / Centre for Digital Music Queen Mary University of Lyngby, Denmark Aalborg University / QMUL London [email protected] Copenhagen / London London, UK [email protected] [email protected] Dan Overholt Andrew P. McPherson Institute for Architecture, Centre for Digital Music Design and Media Technology Queen Mary University of Aalborg University London Copenhagen, Denmark London, UK [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTION When designing an augmented acoustic instrument, it is of- Two common motivations for designing augmented instru- ten of interest to retain an instrument's sound quality and ments are to extend the sonic capabilities of an existing nuanced response while leveraging the richness of digital instrument, or to repurpose the player's existing skill and synthesis. Digital audio has traditionally been generated technique on a traditional instrument. In contrast to tra- through speakers, separating sound generation from the in- ditional acoustic instruments, where sound production is strument itself, or by adding an actuator within the instru- inherently tied to physical construction and energy input ment's resonating body, imparting new sounds along with from the player, it is common with developing digital or the original. We offer a third option, isolating the play- augmented instruments to segment the design into separa- ing interface from the actuated resonating body, allowing ble modules: interface, processing, sound output. us to rewrite the relationship between performance action Most commonly, processing is done on a computer with and sound result while retaining the general form and feel sound then output to a speaker or public address system, of the acoustic instrument. -
Guitar Anatomy Glossary
GUITAR ANATOMY GLOSSARY abalone: an iridescent lining found in the inner shell of the abalone mollusk that is often used alongside mother of pearl; commonly used as an inlay material. action: the distance between the strings and the fretboard; the open space between strings and frets. back: the part of the guitar body held against the player’s chest; it is reflective and resonant, and usually made of a hardwood. backstrip: a decorative inlay that runs the length of the center back of a stringed instrument. binding: the inlaid corner trim at the very edges of an instrument’s body or neck, used to provide aesthetic appeal, seal open wood and to protect the edge of the face and back, as well as the glue joint. bout: the upper or lower outside curve of a guitar or other instrument body. body: an acoustic guitar body; the sound-producing chamber to which the neck and bridge are attached. body depth: the measurement of the guitar body at the headblock and tailblock after the top and back have been assembled to the rim. bracing: the bracing on the inside of the instrument that supports the top and back to prevent warping and breaking, and creates and controls the voice of the guitar. The back of the instrument is braced to help distribute the force exerted by the neck on the body, to reflect sound from the top and act sympathetically to the vibrations of the top. bracing, profile: the contour of the brace, which is designed to control strength and tone. bracing, scalloped: used to describe the crests and troughs of the braces where mass has been removed to accentuate certain nodes. -
Guitar Performance in the Nineteenth Centuries and Twentieth Centuries Paul Sparks
Performance Practice Review Volume 10 Article 7 Number 1 Spring Guitar Performance in the Nineteenth Centuries and Twentieth Centuries Paul Sparks Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/ppr Part of the Music Practice Commons Sparks, Paul (1997) "Guitar Performance in the Nineteenth Centuries and Twentieth Centuries," Performance Practice Review: Vol. 10: No. 1, Article 7. DOI: 10.5642/perfpr.199710.01.07 Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/ppr/vol10/iss1/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Claremont at Scholarship @ Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in Performance Practice Review by an authorized administrator of Scholarship @ Claremont. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Guitar Performance in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries Paul Sparks By 1800 guitars with six single strings (tuned EAdgbe') had become the norm. The rosette gave way to an open sound hole, while the neck was lengthened and fitted with a raised fingerboard extending to the sound hole. Nineteen fixed metal frets eventually became standard, the top note sounding b". The bridge was raised, the body enlarged, and fan-strutting introduced beneath the table to support higher tension strings. Treble strings were made of gut (superseded by more durable nylon after World War 11), bass strings from metal wound on silk (or, more recently, nylon floss). Tablature became obsolete, guitar music being universally written in the treble clef, sounding an octave lower than written. By the 1820s makers such as Louis Panormo of London were replacing wooden tuning pegs with machine heads for more precise tuning, and creating the prototype of the modem classical guitar (a design perfected in mid-century by Antonio Torres). -
Player's Guide
Player’s Guide Contents Imitations Flute...................................................................................6 Introduction Cello ..................................................................................6 Horn ...................................................................................6 How the EBow Works ........................................................2 Harmonica .........................................................................6 Opening Tips .....................................................................2 Energy Slide ......................................................................6 Switch Positions ................................................................2 Distortion Pick....................................................................6 How to Hold the EBow.......................................................2 How to Position the EBow .................................................2 Other Grips Methods of Control Reverse Grip .....................................................................7 Thumb Grip........................................................................7 String Activation .................................................................3 Finger Grip.........................................................................7 Gliding ...............................................................................3 Pressing.............................................................................3 Review Tilting .................................................................................4 -
Timbre Preferences in the Context of Mixing Music
applied sciences Article Timbre Preferences in the Context of Mixing Music Felix A. Dobrowohl *, Andrew J. Milne and Roger T. Dean The MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Development, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia; [email protected] (A.J.M.); [email protected] (R.T.D.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-2-9772-6585 Received: 21 March 2019; Accepted: 16 April 2019; Published: 24 April 2019 Abstract: Mixing music is a highly complex task. This is exacerbated by the fact that timbre perception is still poorly understood. As a result, few studies have been able to pinpoint listeners’ preferences in terms of timbre. In order to investigate timbre preference in a music production context, we let participants mix multiple individual parts of musical pieces (bassline, harmony, and arpeggio parts, all sounded with a synthesizer) by adjusting four specific timbral attributes of the synthesizer (lowpass, sawtooth/square wave oscillation blend, distortion, and inharmonicity). After participants mixed all parts of a musical piece, they were asked to rate multiple mixes of the same musical piece. Listeners showed preferences for their own mixes over random, fixed sawtooth, or expert mixes. However, participants were unable to identify their own mixes. Despite not being able to accurately identify their own mixes, participants consistently preferred the mix they thought to be their own, regardless of whether or not this mix was indeed their own. Correlations and cluster analysis of the participants’ mixing settings show most participants behaving independently in their mixing approaches and one moderate sized cluster of participants who are actually rather similar.