An Inquiry Into Workplace Incivility: Perceptions of Working Graduate Students

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Inquiry Into Workplace Incivility: Perceptions of Working Graduate Students Lindenwood University Digital Commons@Lindenwood University Dissertations Theses & Dissertations Spring 4-2012 An Inquiry into Workplace Incivility: Perceptions of Working Graduate Students Ashley E. Greene Lindenwood University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lindenwood.edu/dissertations Part of the Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research Commons Recommended Citation Greene, Ashley E., "An Inquiry into Workplace Incivility: Perceptions of Working Graduate Students" (2012). Dissertations. 488. https://digitalcommons.lindenwood.edu/dissertations/488 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses & Dissertations at Digital Commons@Lindenwood University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Lindenwood University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. An Inquiry into Workplace Incivility: Perceptions of Working Graduate Students by Ashley E. Greene A Dissertation submitted to the Education Faculty of Lindenwood University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Education School of Education Acknowledgements I would like to extend my utmost sincere thanks to my committee chair, Dr. Lynda Leavitt. The success of my completion of this process is truly accredited to your commitment and determination to not let me fail. You never lost vision of knowing that one day I would cross the finish line. I am deeply grateful for all of your time in and out of the office regardless of your full schedule to help me anyway you could. I could not ask for a better supporter and friend throughout during this process than you. To my committee members: Dr. Sherrie Wisdom, I am so thankful for all of your time and assistance that you dedicated throughout my process. You always showed enthusiasm and encouragement in our discussions and helped me find a way through the statistics and other obstacles. Dr. Beth Kania-Gosche thank you for all of your support, research, knowledge sharing, and progress check-ins along the way, and Dr. Angela Holden, thank you for your support and assistance especially during the coordination and implementation of the survey segment of my research gathering. Extended thanks: Dr. Deb Ayres, Dr. Cynthia Bice, Dr. Rick Boyle, Dr. James Evans, Dr. Larry Matthews, Dr. Terry Stewart, and Dr. JannWeitzel. Supportive thanks to: Dr. Mike McKinne, Dr. Dan Kemper, Dr. Mark Lerman, Dr. Cindy Manjounes, Mr. Terry St. Clair, and the 2010 spring semester working graduate student participants. Special thanks to fellow doctoral cohort Dr. Karolina Lapinska-Schneider for your assistance with my survey segment and always offering to help. A very special thanks to my Mom. It is because of your GRITS that I chose to pursue the need to campaign the importance of civility. Thank you for always ‗non relinques‘ during this experience and reminding me of the importance of my topic and where it is needed most. To my family and friends, thank you for all of your i encouragement, genuine interest, and continued support during my years of research and writing. ii Abstract The purpose of this sequential mixed methods study was to examine and determine the level of incivility in the workplace as a growing problem from the perceptional views of graduate students enrolled in accelerated degree programs for graduate studies in Business Administration, Criminal Justice Administration, Gerontology, Health Management, and Human Resource Management at a private Midwestern university. Modest research on the subject of incivility in the workplace has emerged only recently to identify the problem exists in today‘s workforce, while studies inclusive of diverse populations of employees with short and long term career paths and ranges of employment service years are not visible in the literature. As a baseline for this study, a populace of 405 working graduate students defined what constitutes civil and uncivil behavior in the workplace. Through survey instrumentation and interview discussion the researcher gathered demographics from participants including gender and generation, determined similarities and differences, as well as established common themes. Several measureable impacts of incivility in the workplace were examined to uncover participant views towards employee job satisfaction, employee productivity, and the effectiveness of employees and their management‘s responsiveness towards identifying and sustaining incidents of incivility in the workplace. Additional examination of verbal and non-verbal behaviors associated with incivility in the workplace, perceptions of employees‘ awareness of their own contributions to incivility in the workplace, and uses of technology in the workplace as E-Incivility were included in this study. iii Results generated from quantitative data revealed a weak significance between the demographic groups of working graduate student perceptions towards incivility as a growing problem in the workplace, employee job satisfaction, and job productivity. Subsequent results from additional quantitative data showed faint correlations of working graduate students effectiveness in preventative measures as well as their own contributions of incivility in the workplace. Interview discussions validated perceptions and beliefs that technology use in the workplace is a growing problem of E-Incivility. Conclusively, content from interview discussions provided the researcher insight of whether incivility in the workplace occurs in sporadic bursts or as a daily recurring pattern, resulting in the researcher‘s determination that reinstating civility is of great importance. iv Table of Contents List of Tables .......................................................................................................................x List of Figures .................................................................................................................. xiii Chapter One: Introduction ...................................................................................................1 Background of the Study .................................................................................................1 Statement of Problem .......................................................................................................4 Professional Significance of the Problem ........................................................................5 Overview of Methodology ...............................................................................................6 Research Questions ..........................................................................................................7 Hypotheses .......................................................................................................................8 Definition of Terms .......................................................................................................10 Limitations .....................................................................................................................12 Conclusion .....................................................................................................................13 Chapter Two: Literature Review .......................................................................................15 Introduction ....................................................................................................................15 Civil Theoretical Framework .........................................................................................15 Incivility .......................................................................................................................177 Stress Factors Cause for Incivility .................................................................................19 Workplace Organizational Culture and Climate ............................................................20 Cubical Work Settings / Desk Rage...........................................................................21 Good Ettiquette and Manners ....................................................................................22 Incivility in Health Care and Service .........................................................................23 Legal Professions and Law Enforcement Civility Standards ....................................24 v Incivility of Office Ettiquette .....................................................................................25 Technology and e-Incivility .......................................................................................28 Cell Phones/Blackberries ...........................................................................................29 E-mail .........................................................................................................................30 Influences of Incivility in Social Media .....................................................................31 Negative Effects of Incivility on Employees .............................................................33 Loss of Productivity ...................................................................................................35 Confronting Incivility ................................................................................................37 Summary ........................................................................................................................38 Chapter Three: Methodology .............................................................................................40
Recommended publications
  • To Navigate Office Politics, Map out Your Friends and Foes
    To Navigate Office Politics, Map Out Your Friends and Foes Before you make a political move, draw a POWER map. “The higher up the mountain, the more treacherous change. And third, when you are being evaluated the path.” – Frank Underwood (House of Cards) for promotion to senior leadership. These situations can drastically shift the power dynamics in the Organisational politics is ubiquitous. If you think organisation. Navigating such intricate terrain your workplace is without politics, then perhaps you requires a map. have been blindsided. Everyone has different goals and motives, and alignment is rarely a given. In fact, Take Victor (a composite character inspired by real one may have goals that may not be aligned with the people I have worked with), a project leader who has organisation’s. Thus, leaders must learn the been working at a medium-size consultancy for appropriate political skills to rally supporters and eleven years. He is optimistic about making partner persuade resisters to “get things done”. More this year and knows that a vote on the matter is critically, as one ascends the organisational imminent. Victor has been doing well, but his hierarchy, the politics gets messier as the stakes are expertise is in family business, a relatively niche higher. Perhaps fictional Frank Underwood was area compared to his firm’s two main cash cows: right to say: “For those of us climbing to the top of banking, and oil and gas (O&G). the food chain, there can be no mercy. There is but one rule: Hunt or be hunted.” Victor needs to make his case.
    [Show full text]
  • Zone Comfort
    Staying safe & feeling well ComfortZone September 2018 vol 16 issue 10 Avoid office politics by thinking positive faction on the basis of the tasks alone, and avoid talk on the political issue that separates the groups. If that issue does come up, stay silent or gently try to change the subject. Change from within Praise others, encourage teamwork and be empathetic to your co-workers. By making an effort to change the culture to one of kindness and honesty, you are on the road to creating a better environment for everyone. Keep office matters to yourself Does your organization have issues? Have When a group of people work together colleagues or making them feel as if they people told you things in confidence? every day, there is bound to be “politics”. are inferior to you. It’s a fine line to walk, Then keep those matters to yourself. Everyone is entitled to an opinion and a but avoid being condescending when Talking to outsiders about issues within say, so it is likely that conflicts will occur trying the following tips: your organization makes all of you look because of differing opinions. bad to that outsider. People will find out However, office politics doesn’t have to Be nice that you spoke about what they told you, be a bad thing. If you put more effort in The easiest way to avoid problems is and they’ll lose confidence in you and dissuading your coworkers from taking part to get along with people. This does not respect for you. in destructive politics such as gossiping, mean you have to be a pushover.
    [Show full text]
  • THE POLITICS of REPRODUCTION FORMATIONS: ADOPTION, KINSHIP, and CULTURE Emily Hipchen and John Mcleod, Series Editors the Politics of Reproduction
    THE POLITICS OF REPRODUCTION FORMATIONS: ADOPTION, KINSHIP, AND CULTURE Emily Hipchen and John McLeod, Series Editors The Politics of Reproduction Adoption, Abortion, and Surrogacy in the Age of Neoliberalism Edited by Modhumita Roy and Mary Thompson THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY PRESS COLUMBUS Copyright © 2019 by Th e Ohio State University. Th is edition licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available online at catalog.loc.gov. Cover design by Nathan Putens Text design by Juliet Williams Type set in Adobe Minion Pro Th e paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials. ANSI Z39.48-1992. We dedicate this volume to the memory of our fathers, Richard E. Thompson Jr. (1924–2011) and Birendra Narayan Roy (1926–2011), and to our mothers, Barbara J. Thompson and Pranati Roy, with love and thanks. CONTENTS Acknowledgments ix INTRODUCTION MODHUMITA ROY AND MARY THOMPSON 1 CHAPTER 1 Precarity and Disaster in Jesmyn Ward’s Salvage the Bones: A Reproductive Justice Reading MARY THOMPSON 25 CHAPTER 2 Privileging God the Father: The Neoliberal Theology of the Evangelical Orphan Care Movement VALERIE A. STEIN 42 CHAPTER 3 White Futures: Reproduction and Labor in Neoliberal Times HEATHER MOONEY 61 CHAPTER 4 One Woman’s Choice Is Another Woman’s Disobedience: Seguro Popular and Threats to Midwifery in Mexico ROSALYNN VEGA 82 CHAPTER 5 The Work/Life
    [Show full text]
  • Effective Policies and Programs for Retention and Advancement of Women in the Law
    Addressing the Hours Problem – The PAR Research Institute Effective Policies and Programs for Retention and Advancement of Women in the Law WorkLife Law UC Hastings College of the Law BestAddressing th eP Hourrs actices Problem – The PAR R esearch Institute Diversity Beyond the Body Count 2 Addressing the Hours Problem 3 Appoint a Balanced Hour Coordinator 3 Q & A with Rosyln Pitts, Balanced Hour Coordinator, Kirkpatrick Lockhart 4 Make Balanced Hours Available to All Attorneys 6 Adhere to the Principle of Proportionality 8 Build an Effective Implementation Plan 9 Adopt a Written Policy 10 Develop Individualized Schedules 11 Check for Assignment Disparity 12 Provide Tech Support With That Technology 14 Hold Partners Accountable for Retention and Attrition 15 Job Share 17 Respect Personal Time: Curb Email Use On Weekends 20 It's The Weekend 20 Move Towards Mass Career Customization 21 On-Ramping 22 Telecommunting 23 Compensations Systems 25 Improve Transparency 25 Benchmarking 26 Improve Diversity on Compensation Committees 26 Re-examine The Billable Hours Threshold 27 Redesign Orgination Credit 28 Ensuring a Diverse Committee Handles Dispute 29 Take Pro-Active Steps to Check the Hidden Bias 30 Conform to Standard Business Practices 31 Design a Ccompensation System That Does Not Penalize Part-Time Partners 34 Fair Measure: Toward Effective Attorney Evaluations 36 Work Allocations Systems 39 Diversity Beyond the Body Count For too long, diversity efforts have counted women and lawyers of color, and exhorted employers to improve the body count. The drawback of this approach is that it doesn’t tell employers what is going wrong, or they should be doing differently.
    [Show full text]
  • Riled up About Running for Office: Examining the Impact of Emotions on Political Ambition
    Riled Up about Running for Office: Examining the Impact of Emotions on Political Ambition Jamil S. Scott Department of Government Georgetown University [email protected] Jonathan Collins Department of Education Brown University [email protected] Abstract After the 2016 presidential election, there has been a wave of increased interest in running for office that has been anecdotally associated with anger and fear about the election outcome. Although there is a growing literature that seeks to understand how emotion matters for political action, particularly as it pertains to voting behavior, we do not know how emotions factor into one’s interest in running for office. In this study, we use data from the Collaborative Multiracial Post-Election Survey to examine the relationship between political ambition and feelings surrounding the 2016 election season. In accordance with previous literature, we expect that resources still matter for political participation, but that emotions like anger and fear will also have an impact on political behavior. Keywords: political ambition, affect, political participation, Black politics Introduction In the wake of the 2016 presidential election, there has been an increase in political engagement. Not only have people taken to the streets to protest in record numbers (Crowd Counting Consortium 2017), but they are also running for office (Dittmar 2018). Across the country, cities and states elected the first Black officeholders for positions at the state and local level in 2017 (Owens 2017) and the 2018 election cycle has proven to be a memorable year for diversifying the ranks of elected officials (Haltiwanger and Bostock 2018). This wave of increased political participation during the Trump era is interesting and worthy of further explanation, particularly as it pertains to Black candidate emergence because minority officeholders are underrepresented at all levels of political office.
    [Show full text]
  • Office Politics Author(S): Roderick A
    Office Politics Author(s): Roderick A. MacDonald Source: The University of Toronto Law Journal, Vol. 40, No. 3, Special Issue on Administrative Law (Summer, 1990), pp. 419-476 Published by: University of Toronto Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/825818 . Accessed: 23/12/2013 03:35 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. University of Toronto Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The University of Toronto Law Journal. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 132.216.86.161 on Mon, 23 Dec 2013 03:35:54 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions PART3 Normativeorder in theadministrative state Roderick A. Macdonald* OFFICE POLITICSt Introduction The followingallegory is designed to canvass the internalnormativity of administrativeagencies, bureaus, and tribunals.While theproblem stated is genuine and the structureof thepaper reflectsin large measure myown experiences as dean of a law faculty,I should like to record the standard literarydisclaimer: the characters portrayed are fictitious;any resemblance theymay bear to mycolleagues at McGillor elsewhereis purelyfortuitous. A successfulallegory needs no gloss (or even formalintroduction and conclusion) by its composer. In fact,an author does a disserviceboth to textand to readers by collapsing a parable's several possible lessons into one ex post facto officialreading.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2008 Columbus Bar Lawyers Quarterly Fall 2008 Columbus Bar Lawyers Quarterly 3 President’S Page President’S Page
    F ALL 2008 On Insults To Sausage Makers By David W. Hardymon . .6 A Federal “Drug Court” That Works – And How It Works By The Honorable Terence P. Kemp . .12 Mediation – A New Kind Of Federal Offense By Robert S. Kaiser . .13 When Johnny Or Joanie Comes Marching Home By Duncan O. Aukland . .14 Win A Bet? When Is It Legal To Give An Underage Person A Drink? By Timothy J. Bechtold . .16 Better Lawyer . .21 Elevator And Escalator Injury Claims By Glen R. Pritchard . .33 Women’s Journey Through Addiction By Candace Hartzler . .37 E-Discovery – Small Steps Can Yield Great Savings By Christopher F. Shiflet . .40 Ten Years After: The Columbus Blue Jackets, The NHL And Free Tickets By Greg Kirstein. .45 A Baltic Blast By The Honorable David E. Cain . .47 *A SUPPLEMENT TO THE DAILY REPORTER* *CONTENT PROVIDED BY THE COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION* Better Lawyer Interiors I Am A Lawyer, Now What? Understanding Addiction – Part II COLUMBUS BAR ASSOCIATION By Matthew D. Austin . .Page 21 By Brad Lander . .Page 36 OFFICERS President: Kathleen M. Trafford Practicing Law In An Electronic World Women’s Journey Through Addiction President-Elect: Elizabeth J. Watters By Lisa Kathumbi . .Page 22 By Candace Hartzler . .Page 37 Secretary/Treasurer: Hon. Stephen L. McIntosh F ALL 2008 Immediate Past President: Nelson E Genshaft The Truth About What Clients Really Want Hepatitis C – A Silent Epidemic By Mark Kafantaris . .Page 23 By Rosemary Eustace and Nikki Rogers . .Page 38 BOARD OF GOVERNORS President’s Page Always Consider Jury Instructions Technolawgy David S. Bloomfield, Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Teleworkers Are More Satisfied with Their Jobs Than Are Office
    Journal of Applied Communication Research Vol. 38, No. 4, November 2010, pp. 336Á361 Why Teleworkers are More Satisfied with Their Jobs than are Office-Based Workers: When Less Contact is Beneficial Kathryn L. Fonner & Michael E. Roloff This study challenges assumptions regarding the value and necessity of frequent face- to-face workplace interaction by building upon a theoretical framework for the consequences of telecommuting. Using a multiple mediation approach and path analysis, the study examines the extent to which telework affects job satisfaction through the experiences of workÁlife conflict, stress due to meetings and interruptions, perceived organizational politics, and information exchange. Results reveal that high-intensity teleworkers (n 89) are more satisfied than office-based employees (n 103) and achieve significant benefits from their work arrangement, with workÁlife conflict most influential toward job satisfaction. The path model reveals more complex indirect paths linking telework and job satisfaction. Keywords: Telework; Job Satisfaction; Organizational Politics; Meetings; WorkÁLife Conflict Telework is a ‘‘work arrangement in which employees perform their regular work at a site other than the ordinary workplace, supported by technological connections’’ (Fitzer, 1997, p. 65), and has become increasingly prevalent in the United States (WorldatWork, 2009). Job satisfaction is one of the most commonly reported outcomes of telework (Pinsonneault & Boisvert, 2001), yet doubts remain regarding Kathryn L. Fonner is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Communication at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Michael E. Roloff is a Professor in the Department of Communication Studies at Northwestern University. Data were collected as part of the first author’s dissertation. We would like to thank Laura Stafford and the anonymous Journal of Applied Communication Research reviewers for their thoughtful feedback during the review process.
    [Show full text]
  • Domesticating Democracy
    DOMESTICATING DEMOCRACY THE POLITICS OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION IN BOLIVIA SUSAN HELEN ELLISON Domesticating Democracy SUSAN HELEN ELLISON Domesticating Democracy The Politics of Conflict Resolution in Bolivia Duke University Press Durham and London 2018 © 2018 Duke University Press All rights reserved Printed in the United States of Amer ic a on acid-f ree paper ∞ Text designed by Courtney Leigh Baker Cover designed by Matthew Tauch Typeset in Minion Pro and Trade Gothic Bold Condensed #18 by Westchester Publishing Ser vices Library of Congress Cataloging-in- Pu blication Data Names: Ellison, Susan (Susan Helen), author. Title: Domesticating democracy : the politics of conflict resolution in Bolivia / Susan Helen Ellison. Description: Durham : Duke University Press, 2018. | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: lccn 2017049284 (print) lccn 2017056249 (ebook) isbn 9780822371786 (ebook) isbn 9780822370932 (hardcover : alk. paper) isbn 9780822371083 (pbk. : alk. paper) Subjects: lcsh: Conflict management— Bolivia— El Alto. | Social conflict— Bolivia— El Alto. | Dispute resolution (Law)— Bolivia. | Mediation— Bolivia— El Alto. | Conciliation (Civil procedure)— Bolivia. | Non- governmental organ izations— Political activity— Bolivia— El Alto. Classification:lcc hn280.e38 (ebook) | lcc hn280.e38 E45 2018 (print) | ddc 303.6/90984— dc23 lc rec ord available at https:// lccn . loc . gov / 2017049284 Cover art: Design and illustration by Matthew Tauch. A sewing machine stitches the rainbow-c heckered wiphala flag utilized by
    [Show full text]
  • Underwriting in the 21St Century
    70 ON THE RISK vol.22 n.4 (2006) UNDERWRITING IN THE 21ST CENTURY: LIFE OUTSIDE THE HOME OFFICE Eli Rowe Christos Orestis III Chief Executive Officer Consultant Parameds.com Parameds.com New York, NY Yarmouth, ME Executive Summary: Previous articles in this series have explored how to break down silos between underwriting and distribution; the emergence of outsourcing and automation as important underwriting productivity drivers; and, we have analyzed ways to get more value from the ubiquitous—yet paradoxical—attending physician statement (APS). The common thread throughout this series of articles is overcoming the challenges that underwriting departments must face every day as the demands on underwriting departments increase while available resources decrease. For this installment, we spoke with a number of underwriters who have decades of risk management experience, about their perceptions of the industry today and what it is like to be part of the growing trend of “remote underwriting.” Introduction How many years have you been an underwriter? A “perfect storm” of trends in underwriting has All of the participants had significant experience as emerged to challenge the industry in the early years underwriters working for life and health insurers with of the 21st century: a range between 5 and 40 years. All have been 1. An alarming number of the most experienced underwriting on an outsourced basis anywhere from underwriters have reached (or are reaching) retire- 1-5 years. ment age. 2. There are not enough well-trained underwriters What companies were you employed by when coming up through the ranks to fill the void.
    [Show full text]
  • (Iowa City, Iowa), 2014-02-11
    TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 11, 2014 THE INDEPENDENT DAILY NEWSPAPER FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA COMMUNITY SINCE 1868 DAILYIOWAN.COM 50¢ Lawsuit In a league of her own in court again A lawsuit against the University of Iowa will reach the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday. By LILY ABROMEIT [email protected] A local case now in its fifth year will move to the next phase Thurs- day, when it reaches the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals in St. Paul, Minn. The court will hear the arguments in Wagner v. Jones, discussing wheth- er or not Teresa Wagner, a potential candidate for a posi- tion in the Universi- ty of Iowa College of Law, was denied a job by then-Dean Carolyn Jones on the basis of Wagner’s political af- filiation. While officials said Wagner they couldn’t be con- plaintiff fident in how the case will culminate, they said it could have possible implications for the ac- (The Daily Iowan/Tessa Hursh) ademic world. “Politics is often a point of friction,” said Walter Olson, a senior fellow at the Cato Institute. “[If she won,] law schools would be looking over their Iowa head coach Lisa Bluder watches a special video presentation in shoulders a lot … more when they decide who to hire.” celebration of her 270th victory in Carver-Hawkeye on Monday. Iowa He said it could begin to set an ex- ample for future employees. “It’s likely to be watched by peo- defeated Northwestern, 90-84. With the victory, Bluder surpasses C. ple of other law schools … because it raises some hopes and some fears at the same time,” he said.
    [Show full text]
  • View Slides from Working from Home: Lessons Learned Over the Past Year
    Working from Home: Lessons Learned Over the Past Year A presentation of the Twin Cities Telework webinar series Thursday, February 25, 2021 Agenda ▪ Telework along the I-494 corridor ▪ National attitudes toward telework ▪ Today’s challenges for teleworking ▪ Support for teleworkers ▪ Planning for the future ▪ Questions Telework along the I-494 corridor February 2021 Commuter Survey | February 1-15 ▪ Distributed to 4,038 commuters ▪ 472 responses received ▪ 12 percent response rate Telework along the I-494 corridor ▪ 65 percent of respondents are teleworking today, compared to 3 percent this time last year ▪ 48 percent of respondents think they will return to the worksite – at least part-time – in three to nine months ▪ 75 percent of teleworkers use computers provided by their employers; 53 percent use computer monitors provided by their employers ▪ 64 percent of teleworkers currently use their personal cell phone to conduct company business; 8 percent receive a monthly stipend for cell use The pros and cons after nearly a year Challenges to telework: Positives of telework: ▪ Feelings of isolation: 44 percent ▪ Saving time on the commute: 77 ▪ Poor communication with percent coworkers: 38 percent ▪ Saving money: 61 percent ▪ Feeling stressed: 24 percent ▪ More time with family: 50 ▪ Helping children: 17 percent percent ▪ Poor communication with ▪ More productive: 40 percent managers: 13 percent ▪ Fewer distractions: 37 percent National attitudes toward telework ▪ Extreme teleworking ▪ July is the new January ▪ Productivity Telework during COVID-19 • Extreme teleworking … not the normal situation for teleworking • Everyone in the household under one roof • Working • Home schooling • Providing childcare • Cooking and baking • Stressed by the pandemic July or later is the new January: More companies delay return to the office • From Ford to Microsoft, white-collar companies are increasingly extending working from home through summer.
    [Show full text]