DOCSLIB.ORG

Remington, Kristi L Wednesday, December 4, 2002 11:15 AM Willett

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Remington, Kristi L Wednesday, December 4, 2002 11:15 AM Willett Remington, Kristi L From: Remington, Kristi L Sent: Wednesday, December 4, 2002 11:15 AM To: Willett, Don; Keefer, Wendy J; Charnes, Adam; ' Brett Kavanaugh' Subject: SJC meeting There was one- other issue I forgot to mention: be handling logistics. - Original Message-­ From: Willett, Don Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 11:04 AM To: Remington, Kristi L Subject: RE: RE: RE: Tues meetings Did they see these weekly counsel meetings starting in Jan.? --Original Message-- From: Remington, Kristi L Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 10:59 AM To: Willett, Don; Goodling, Monica Cc: Charnes, Adam; Keefer, Wendy J; 'Brett Kavanaugh (E-mail)' Subject: RE: RE: RE: Tues meetings The- SJC staff called the meeting to let everyone know that January - March would be very busy with judges. They also wanted to make sure the counsels would get their individual Senators involved. There was a lot of talking at the meeting, but the following were the major issues for OLP/WH: - Original Message--­ From: Willett, Don C ~~._, IAl~.J-~~.J~ .. ri~~-mL..~~ t\,1 "lt\t\"l 1 f\,1 1 I\ r. 11 007104-001877 Document ID: 0.7.19343.5287 ;:>t::lll, V\lt::Ullt::!>UdY, Ut::'-1:IIIUt::I V'l-1 £VV£ .J.V;.J. J. l"'\IVI To: Remington, Kristi L; Goodling, Monica Cc: Charnes, Adam; Keefer, Wendy J; Brett Kavanaugh (E-mail) Subject: FW: RE: RE: Tues meetings Kristi - When you get a chance today, can you e-mail us a download on yesterday's 2:15 Manny mtg.? Thanks. ORW -Original Message- From: Manuel Miranda (mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 2:44 PM To: Willett, Don Cc: Remington, Kristi L Subject: Re:RE: RE: Tues meetings Kristi is great, it's really so that one person can report back to all at OLP what we are looking at from a final product perspective. I am copying Brett on this string in case he wants to attend. This meeting is just to touch base and I didn't want to just take a lot of folk's time, but Brett or any others from the WH Counsel are welcome. (Brett, it would be useful if your new press person attended the 3:15 along with Merci.) _________Reply Separator_________ Subject: RE: RE: Tues meetings Author: "Willett; Don" <[email protected]> Date: 11/27/2002 4:37 PM Manny, I now have 4 judicial interviews scattered throughout Tues. afternoon. Kristi can cover the Hill mtg. if you want to keep the 2:15 time slot. Is this Hill/DoJ only, no WH? ORW -Original Message-- From: Manuel Miranda [mailto:[email protected]) Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 2:48 PM To: Willett, Don; Goodling, Monica Subject: Re:RE: Tues meetings Great, it's just for purposes of reporting to everyone at OLP. And so as not to take to many people's time. _ ________Reply Separator_________ Subject: RE: Tues meetings Author: "Willett; Don" <[email protected]> Date: 11/27/2002 2:30 PM 007104-001878 Document ID: 0.7.19343.5287 I have a judicial interview @ 2:00 on Tues. but can likely get someone to cover it. Bottom line: I and/or probably Adam {maybe Wendy and/or Kristi, too) will be there. DRW --Original Message--- From: Manuel Miranda (mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 2:20 PM To: Willett, Don; Goodling, Monica Subject: Tues meetings Monica and Don, I copied you on an email to counsel with the thought that you or someone from your offices could attend the respective meetings on Tuesday. Let me know. Manny _________Forward Header__________To: JC Counsels Subject: Nominations Meetings Author: Manuel Miranda Date: 11/ 27/2002 2:20 PM Hello friends. Now that we all have had t ime to think a few things through, we would like to bring us a ll together for some joint thinking on judicial nominations in the immediate future. Let's meet on Tuesday at 2:15 in the Utah Room (Hatch personal office). Feel free to bring other counsel or staff who will work with you on nomnaitions issues. Although the hope is to get us to have a relaxed discussion, the meeting should last no more than one hour. One other thing, please invite your Senator's press secretary or commnications staff on nominations issues either to attend with you at 2:15 or to arrive at 3:15 for a meeting on communications. Have a peaceful and Happy Thanksgiving! Manny 007104-001879 Document ID: 0.7.19343.5287 Newstead, Jennifer From: Newstead, Jennifer Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 6:07 PM To: '/DDV=-H [email protected]/DDT=RFC - 822/0=INETGW/P=GOV+DOJ/A =TELEMAIL/C=US/'; Dinh, Viet; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; 'C [email protected]'; '[email protected]'; 'Brett_M._ [email protected]'; '[email protected]'; 'Helgard_C._Walker@ who.eop.gov' Subject: RE: Wash. Times Story on Judges At yesterday's confirmation working group meeting we discussed a possible strategy- would be welcome. Jen -Original Message-­ From: /DDV=H._Christopher_ [email protected]/DDT = RFC-822/O=IN ETGW/P=GOV+ DOJ/A=TELEMAIL/C=US/ [ mailto:/DDV=H. [email protected] /DDT =-RFC-822/O=IN ETG W/P=GOV+DOJ/A=TELEMAIL/C=US/] Sent Tuesday, December 11, 2001 5:55 PM To: Newstead, Jennifer; Dinh, Viet; [email protected]; Rachel_L_ [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Helgard_ [email protected] Subject: Wash. Times .Story on Judges 0071 04-001880 Document ID: 0.7.19343.6868 0071 04-001881 Document ID: 0.7.19343.6868 Newstead, Jennifer From: Newstead, Jennifer Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 3:36 PM To: '[email protected]'; '[email protected]' Cc: Dinh, Viet Subject: Attachments: Here are talking points on Pickering that -Original Message-- From: [email protected] {mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 3:18 PM To: [email protected] Cc: Newstead, Jennifer; Dinh, Viet; Alberto_ [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Helgard _ [email protected]; Bradford _A._ [email protected]; Heather_Wingate@w ho.eop.gov Subject: Re: Pickering Anne: I'll talk to Viet/Jen who have the lead on this and will make sure you get the info you need. Anne Womack 01/23/2002 03:11:31 PM Record Type: Record To: Brett M. Kavanaugh/WHO/EOP@EOP cc: See the distribution list at the bottom of this message Subject: Re: Pickering (Document link: Brett M. Kavanaugh) 0071 04-001882 Document ID: 0.7.19343.7062 someone please give me some background on what the problem is with him. Message Copied To: ___________________________ alberto r. gonzales/who/eop@eop timothy e. flanigan/who/eop@eop noel j. francisco/who/eop@eop helgard c. walker/who/eop@eop bradford a. berenson/who/eop@eop [email protected] @ inet [email protected] @ inet heather wingate/who/ eop@eop 0071 04-001883 Document ID: 0.7.19343.7062 Dinh, Viet From: Dinh, Viet Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 5:41 PM To: ' Bradford_A._ [email protected]'; Newstead, Jennifer; ' [email protected]' Subject: RE: WSJ -Original Message-- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 4:53 PM To: Newstead, Jennifer; Dinh, Viet; [email protected] Subject: WSJ Jess Bravin of the WSJ is doing a story on tomorrow's news conference with a specific focus on Pickering. His number is - · Someone should probably 0071 04-001884 Document ID: 0.7.19343.7079 [email protected] From: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 9:57 AM To: Newstead, Jennifer; Dinh, Viet Subject: Pickering This is almost certainly not a novel idea, but I think ·- 0071 04-001885 Document ID: 0.7.19343.7072 Newst ead, Jennifer From: Newstead, Jennifer Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 10:34 AM To: '[email protected] ' Cc: Dinh, Viet; ' [email protected]' Subject: RE: Pickering --Original Message--- From: [email protected] (mailto:Anne_ [email protected]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 9:51 AM To: Newstead, Jennifer Cc: Dinh, Viet; Brett_ [email protected] Subject: RE: Pickering 0071 04-001 886 Document ID: 0.7.19343.7074 Newstead, Jennifer From: Newstead, Jennifer Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:39 PM To: Dinh, Viet; '[email protected]' Cc: Benedi, Lizette D; Benczkowski, Brian A Subject: FW: Pickering Op-Ed Attachments: Dillard.Oped.wpd FYI, our first report on this morning's press conference is that Pickering heard again that the hearing will be the first week in Feb. with Feinstein chairing. Jen - Original Message-- From: Ed Haden (mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:33 PM To: Newstead, Jennifer Subject: Pickering Op,-Ed Mime message with no plain text. 007104-001887 Document ID: 0.7.19343.7076 Dinh, Viet From: Dinh, Viet Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 9:25 AM To: '[email protected] '; Newstead, Jennifer Cc: '[email protected]' Subject: RE: Pickering We will monitor item 2; we already have pre-arranged surrogates and op~ed materials to go. --Original Message--- From: Anne_ [email protected] [mailto:Anne_ [email protected]] Sent~ Thursday, January 24, 2002 8:23 PM To: Newstead, Jennifer Cc: Dinh, Viet; [email protected] Subject: RE: Pickering Brett and I can work together on that from this end, or Viet and Jennifer, if you all would like to take the lead, that's fine too.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Senate Section (PDF929KB)
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 109 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 151 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, MAY 19, 2005 No. 67 Senate The Senate met at 9:30 a.m. and was ceed to executive session for the con- Yesterday, 21 Senators—evenly di- called to order by the President pro sideration of calendar No. 71, which the vided, I believe 11 Republicans and 10 tempore (Mr. STEVENS). clerk will report. Democrats—debated for over 10 hours The legislative clerk read the nomi- on the nomination of Priscilla Owen. PRAYER nation of Priscilla Richman Owen, of We will continue that debate—10 hours The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- Texas, to be United States Circuit yesterday—maybe 20 hours, maybe 30 fered the following prayer: Judge for the Fifth Circuit. hours, and we will take as long as it Let us pray. RECOGNITION OF THE MAJORITY LEADER takes for Senators to express their God of grace and glory, open our eyes The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The views on this qualified nominee. to the power You provide for all of our majority leader is recognized. But at some point that debate should challenges. Give us a glimpse of Your SCHEDULE end and there should be a vote. It ability to do what seems impossible, to Mr. FRIST. Mr. President, today we makes sense: up or down, ‘‘yes’’ or exceed what we can request or imagine. will resume executive session to con- ‘‘no,’’ confirm or reject; and then we Encourage us again with Your promise sider Priscilla Owen to be a U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Judge Shedd Edits
    FOURTH CIRCUIT JUDGE ASSUMES SENIOR STATUS Emma Cummings* On January 30, 2018 Judge Dennis W. Shedd stepped down from his 15 years of service as an active judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit and assumed senior status.1 Judge Shedd, along with Judge Paul V. Niemeyer and Judge William B. Traxler, Jr. of the Fourth Circuit, heard oral arguments on January 30 at the University of South Carolina School of Law.2 After oral arguments, Judge Shedd was presented with the Order of the Palmetto Award by South Carolina Governor Henry McMaster.3 Judge Shedd was born in Cordova, South Carolina and graduated with a Bachelor of Arts from Wofford College in 1975.4 He went on to graduate from the University of South Carolina School of Law in 1978, and from Georgetown University Law Center with his L.L.M. in 1980.5 Judge Shedd was a member of United States Senator Strom Thurmond’s staff from 1978 to 1988.6 During this time he also became chief counsel and staff director for the Senate Committee on the Judiciary.7 On October 17, 1990, President George H.W. Bush nominated Judge Shedd to the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina.8 Judge Shedd served on this court for 13 years until he was nominated by * Samford University, Cumberland School of Law, Candidate for Juris Doctor, May 2019; Wofford College, Bachelor of Arts, May 2016. 1 Fourth Circuit Judge Shedd Assumes Senior Status and Receives Order of the Palmetto, Latest News & Announcements, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT (Feb.
    [Show full text]
  • JUSTICE for ALL. NO EXCEPTIONS. That’S the American Way People for the American Way Foundation  Introduction
    THE HUMAN TOLL How Individual Americans Have Fared at the Hands of Bush Judges JUSTICE FOR ALL. NO EXCEPTIONS. That’s the American Way People For the American www.PFAW.org Way Foundation 1 Introduction As President Bush nears the end of his second term with record low approval ratings, the American public has rendered a clear verdict: the policies of the Bush administration have largely failed at home and abroad. Yet by one important measure that pollsters and pundits often ignore, Bush has been an over-achiever: during his administration, 314 judges have been confirmed to lifetime appoints to the federal bench, including the two Bush nominees who now sit on the United States Supreme Court, Chief Justice John Roberts and Associate Justice Samuel Alito. The impact that President Bush has had on the federal courts may be his most enduring legacy, at least domestically. After leaders to come have figured out what to do about $4.00 gasoline, $4 trillion in debt, a battered economy and a war that has damaged our standing in the world, Bush’s judges will still be safely ensconced on the federal bench, and on the highest court in the land. What has that meant for individual Americans? And what will that mean in the future? People For the American Way Foundation has documented in a series of reports the damage that Bush- nominated judges have done to the Constitution – and to Americans’ ability to seek and expect justice in the federal courts when challenging unlawful treatment by corporations, government agencies, and other powerful entities.
    [Show full text]
  • Advise & Consent
    The Los Angeles County Bar Association Appellate Courts Section Presents Advise & Consent: A Primer to the Federal Judicial Appointment Process Wednesday, October 28, 2020 Program - 12:00 - 1:30 PM Zoom Webinar CLE Credit: 1.5 Hours Credit (including Appellate Courts Specialization) Provider #36 The Los Angeles County Bar Association is a State Bar of California approved MCLE provider. The Los Angles County Bar Association certifies that this activity has been approved for MCLE credit by the State Bar of California. PANELIST BIOS Judge Kenneth Lee (Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals) Kenneth Kiyul Lee is a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Senate confirmed him on May 15, 2019, making him the nation’s first Article III judge born in the Republic of Korea. Prior to his appointment, Judge Lee was a partner at the law firm of Jenner & Block in Los Angeles, where he handled a wide variety of complex litigation matters and had a robust pro bono practice. Judge Lee previously served as an Associate Counsel to President George W. Bush and as Special Counsel to Senator Arlen Specter, then-chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee. He started his legal career as an associate at Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz in New York. Judge Lee is a 2000 magna cum laude graduate of Harvard Law School and a 1997 summa cum laude graduate of Cornell University. He clerked for Judge Emilio M. Garza of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit from 2000 to 2001. Judge Leslie Southwick (Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals) Leslie Southwick was appointed to the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Circuit and District Court Nominations by President George W
    Order Code RL31868 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web U.S. Circuit and District Court Nominations by President George W. Bush During the 107th and 108th Congresses Updated April 18, 2005 Denis Steven Rutkus Specialist in American National Government Government and Finance Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress U.S. Circuit and District Court Nominations by President George W. Bush During the 107th and 108th Congresses Summary This report lists and provides statistics on President George W. Bush’s nominations to U.S. district courts and courts of appeal (circuit courts) during the 107th and 108th Congresses and actions taken on the nominations by the Senate Judiciary Committee and the full Senate. The statistics can be compared with those for previous Congresses and presidencies in CRS Report RL31635, Judicial Nomination Statistics: U.S. District and Circuit Courts, 1977-2003, by Denis Steven Rutkus and Mitchel A. Sollenberger. During the 107th and 108th Congresses, the Senate confirmed 35 of President Bush’s 52 nominees to U.S. circuit courts. During the 107th Congress, the Senate confirmed 17 of his 32 circuit nominees. Of 15 nominees not confirmed, nine did not receive a Judiciary Committee hearing, no committee vote was taken on four others, and the committee voted not to report two others. All 15 nominees not confirmed were returned to the President at the end of the 107th Congress, and the President renominated 14 of them at the start of the 108th Congress. During the 108th Congress, the President nominated 34 persons to circuit court judgeships (14 renominations plus 20 new nominations), of whom 18 were confirmed.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes for Report Re Confirmed Bush Judges
    CONFIRMED JUDGES, CONFIRMED FEARS A Preliminary Look At How Appellate Judges Nominated By President Bush Are Already Threatening The Rights Of Ordinary Americans People For the American Way Foundation January 23, 2004 Ralph G. Neas President 2000 M Street NW ♦ Suite 400 ♦ Washington, DC 20036 Telephone 202.467.4999 ♦ Fax 202.293.2672 ♦ [email protected] ♦ Web site-http://www.pfaw.org CONFIRMED JUDGES, CONFIRMED FEARS A Preliminary Look At How Appellate Judges Nominated By President Bush Are Already Threatening The Rights Of Ordinary Americans _________________________________ In selecting nominees for the federal courts, President George W. Bush has often stated that he is looking for judges who will interpret the law, not make it. In fact, however, Senators and many others have expressed serious concern that many of the Administration’s nominees violate that standard. Particularly with respect to such controversial nominees as William Pryor and Priscilla Owen, opponents have contended, many of the Administration’s nominees have a record of trying to re-make the law to undermine civil and consumer rights, constitutional liberties, environmental protections, and the authority of Congress to protect these and other rights. Pursuant to its constitutional responsibility, the Senate has declined to consent to several Administration nominees because of such concerns. Contrary to the claims of some, however, the vast majority of Bush nominees — 169 out of 175 who have reached the Senate floor — have been confirmed, most without controversy. This report provides a preliminary look at the record so far of the most important of those confirmed judges, those who now sit on the federal courts of appeal, in the significant areas of concern raised about Administration nominees.1 Because the Supreme Court takes so few cases, the federal appellate courts are effectively the courts of last resort for the vast majority of Americans.
    [Show full text]
  • Clash of Old and New Fourth Circuit Ideologies: Boyer-Liberto V
    South Carolina Law Review Volume 66 Issue 4 ANNUAL SURVEY OF SOUTH CAROLINA Article 11 LAW Summer 2015 Clash of Old and New Fourth Circuit Ideologies: Boyer-Liberto v. Fontainebleau Corp. and the Moderation of the Fourth Circuit Brian S. Clarke Charleston School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/sclr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Brian S. Clarke, Clash of Old and New Fourth Circuit Ideologies: Boyer-Liberto v. Fontainebleau Corp. and the Moderation of the Fourth Circuit, 66 S. C. L. Rev. 927 (2015). This Article is brought to you by the Law Reviews and Journals at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in South Carolina Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Clarke: Clash of Old and New Fourth Circuit Ideologies: Boyer-Liberto v. THE CLASH OF OLD AND NEW FOURTH CIRCUIT IDEOLOGIES: BOYER-LIBERTO V. FONTAINEBLEAU CORP. AND THE MODERATION OF THE FOURTH CIRCUIT Brian S. Clarke I. IDEOLOGICAL AND POLITICAL EVOLUTION OF THE FOURTH CIRCUIT........ 928 II. EMPIRICAL DATA ................................................... 935 III. CLASH IN ACTION: BOYER-LIBERTO V. FONTAINEBLEAU CORP. .............. 937 A. Opinions ...................................... 937 B. Clash .................................................... 940 IV. CONCLUSION ................................................ ....... 942 V. POSTSCRIPT .................................................. ...... 943 The Fourth Circuit has changed.
    [Show full text]
  • CRS Report for Congress Received Through the CRS Web
    Order Code RL31868 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web U.S. Circuit and District Court Nominations by President George W. Bush During the 107th-109th Congresses Updated May 24, 2006 Denis Steven Rutkus Specialist in American National Government Government and Finance Division Maureen Bearden Information Research Specialist Knowledge Services Group Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress U.S. Circuit and District Court Nominations by President George W. Bush During the 107th - 109th Congresses Summary As of April 7, 2006, 43 of President George W. Bush’s 58 nominees to the U.S. circuit courts of appeals have received Senate confirmation. Of the 15 nominees not confirmed, the nominations of four were returned at the end of a Congress and not resubmitted in a subsequent Congress; the nominations of three were withdrawn by the President (one during the 108th, two during the 109th Congress); and the nominations of the eight others were pending. None of his circuit nominees has been rejected in a Senate confirmation vote. Two of 10 circuit nominees on whom the Senate could not agree to close debate in the108th Congress were given temporary recess appointments by President Bush. After the recess appointment of one of these nominees expired at the end of the Congress, he was not renominated in the 109th Congress. The other recess appointee, prior to the expiration of his appointment, was renominated in the 109th Congress and subsequently confirmed. Two of President Bush’s circuit nominees were defeated in committee votes, when the Senate Judiciary Committee, in the 107th Congress, voted not to report their nominations to the Senate.
    [Show full text]
  • Judicial Nominations President Bush's Confirmed Judicial
    http://leahy.senate.gov/issues/nominations/index.html Judicial Nominations "The Constitution requires that the President seek the Senate’s advice and consent in making appointments to the federal courts. As a senator and as the Democratic leader of the Senate Judiciary Committee, I take this responsibility very seriously." -- Senator Patrick Leahy, Chairman, Senate Judiciary Committee 316 Of President Bush's Article III Judicial Nominees Have Been Confirmed. (As of September 29, 2008) Read a complete list of President Bush's confirmed nominees. http://leahy.senate.gov/issues/nominations/confirmednominees.htm President Bush's Confirmed Judicial Nominations Court of Supreme Court Circuit Court District Court International Nominees Nominees Nominees Trade As of September 29, 2008 Supreme Court Nominees 2. Samuel A. Alito, Associate Justice, Jan. 31, 2006 1. John G. Roberts, Chief Justice, Sept. 29, 2005 (vote (vote 58-42) 78-22) Circuit Court Nominees 61. Raymond Kethledge, 6th Circuit, June 24, 31. Franklin van Antwerpen, 3rd Circuit, May 20, 2008 (voice vote) 2004 (vote 96-0)30. D. Michael Fisher, 3rd Circuit, 60. Helene N. White, 6th Circuit, June 24, 2008 Dec. 9, 2003 (voice vote) (vote 63-32) 29. Carlos Bea, 9th Circuit, Sept. 29, 2003 (vote 59. G. Steven Agee, 4th Circuit, May 20, 2008 86-0) (vote 96-0) 28. Steven Colloton, 8th Circuit, Sept. 4, 2003 58. Catharina Haynes, 5th Circuit, April 10, 2008 (vote 94-1) (unanimous consent) 27. Allyson K. Duncan, 4th Circuit, July 17, 2003 57. John Daniel Tinder, 7th Circuit, December 18, (vote 93-0) 2007(vote 93-0) 26. Richard Wesley, 2nd Circuit, June 11, 2003 56.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Circuit and District Court Nominations by President George W. Bush During the 107Th-109Th Congresses
    Order Code RL31868 U.S. Circuit and District Court Nominations by President George W. Bush During the 107th-109th Congresses Updated January 23, 2007 Denis Steven Rutkus Specialist in American National Government Government and Finance Division Kevin M. Scott Analyst in American National Government Government and Finance Division Maureen Bearden Information Research Specialist Knowledge Services Group U.S. Circuit and District Court Nominations by President George W. Bush During the 107th - 109th Congresses Summary During his presidency, as of the final adjournment of the 109th Congress, 51 of President George W. Bush’s 68 nominees to the U.S. circuit courts of appeals received Senate confirmation. Of the 17 nominees not confirmed, the nominations of three were withdrawn by the President, and the remaining 14 were returned at the end of a Congress; however, four of the 14, after having their nominations returned at the end of the 109th Congress, were renominated at the start of the 110th Congress. None of President Bush’s circuit nominees has been rejected in a Senate confirmation vote. Two were defeated in committee votes, in the 107th Congress, although both were renominated in the 108th Congress, where one was confirmed. In the 108th Congress, the Senate could not agree to close debate on 10 circuit court nominees. Following controversy over the propriety of filibusters on judicial nominations, a compromise was reached in the 109th Congress which resulted in confirmation votes for five of the 10 nominees. The other five, however, failed to gain confirmation. Two of the 10 nominees were given temporary recess appointments by President Bush.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Alarms Or Smoke Detectors: the Role of Interest Groups in Confirmation of United States Courts of Appeals Judges
    FIRE ALARMS OR SMOKE DETECTORS: THE ROLE OF INTEREST GROUPS IN CONFIRMATION OF UNITED STATES COURTS OF APPEALS JUDGES By DONALD E. CAMPBELL A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2016 © 2016 Donald E. Campbell To Ken and JJ ACKNOWLEDGMENTS It took Leo Tolstoy six years to write War and Peace. It has taken me twice that long to complete this dissertation, and I am certain I required much more support throughout the process than Tolstoy. I begin my acknowledgements with Dr. Marcus Hendershot. In short, this dissertation would not have been possible without Marc’s guidance, advice, and prodding. Every aspect of this dissertation has Marc’s imprint on it in some way. I cannot imagine the amount of time that he spent providing comments and suggestions. I will forever be in his debt and gratitude. I also want to thank the other members of my dissertation committee. Dr. Lawrence Dodd, the chair, has been a steadying force in my graduate school life since (literally) the first day I stepped in the door of Anderson Hall. His advice and encouragement will never be forgotten. The other members of my committee–Dr. Beth Rosenson, Dr. David Hedge, and Professor Danaya Wright (University of Florida School of Law)–have been more than understanding as the months dragged into years of getting the dissertation finalized. No one could ask for a better or more understanding dissertation committee. There are also several individuals outside of the University of Florida that I owe acknowledgements.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Judicial Selection from George Bush to Donald Trump
    Notre Dame Law Review Volume 95 Issue 5 Article 3 6-19-2020 A Survivor's Perspective: Federal Judicial Selection from George Bush to Donald Trump Leslie H. Southwick Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr Part of the Courts Commons, Judges Commons, and the President/Executive Department Commons Recommended Citation 95 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1847 (2020). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Notre Dame Law Review at NDLScholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Notre Dame Law Review by an authorized editor of NDLScholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. \\jciprod01\productn\N\NDL\95-5\NDL503.txt unknown Seq: 1 10-JUN-20 15:01 A SURVIVOR’S PERSPECTIVE: FEDERAL JUDICIAL SELECTION FROM GEORGE BUSH TO DONALD TRUMP Leslie H. Southwick* INTRODUCTION Where are we, and how did we get here? Those are not bad questions for seeking a way out of any troubled situa- tion, or for that matter, remaining in a good one. Over recent decades, fed- eral judicial selection controversies are worsening in their frequency and intensity. They distort all three branches of government. My particular con- cern is with federal judicial selection for judgeships below the Olympian heights of those on the United States Supreme Court, namely, the judges on the twelve regional circuit courts of appeals and the ninety-four district courts. The depth of partisan acrimony over judicial confirmations has placed us in the infernal regions, and we seem to be continuing our descent.
    [Show full text]