DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:1907.09897V2 [Astro-Ph.CO] 8 Oct 2019 Ter and Dark Energy Densities ΩM and ΩΛ, Dark Energy Equation of State Parameter W (Which May Itself Depend Et Al

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:1907.09897V2 [Astro-Ph.CO] 8 Oct 2019 Ter and Dark Energy Densities ΩM and ΩΛ, Dark Energy Equation of State Parameter W (Which May Itself Depend Et Al Draft version October 9, 2019 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 12/16/11 CALIBRATING THE COSMIC DISTANCE LADDER USING GRAVITATIONAL-WAVE OBSERVATIONS Anuradha Gupta Institute for Gravitation and Cosmos, Physics Department, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA Derek Fox Institute for Gravitation and the Cosmos, Physics Department, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA and Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA B. S. Sathyaprakash Institute for Gravitation and the Cosmos, Department of Physics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA and School of Physics and Astronomy, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK, CF24 3AA B. F. Schutz School of Physics and Astronomy, Cardiff University, 5, The Parade, Cardiff, UK, CF24 3AA and Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics (Albert Einstein Institute), 14476 Potsdam/Golm, Germany Draft version October 9, 2019 ABSTRACT Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) are among preeminent distance ladders for precision cosmology due to their intrinsic brightness, which allows them to be observable at high redshifts. Their usefulness as unbiased estimators of absolute cosmological distances however depends on accurate understanding of their intrinsic brightness, or anchoring their distance scale. This knowledge is based on calibrating their distances with Cepheids. Gravitational waves from compact binary coalescences, being stan- dard sirens, can be used to validate distances to SNe Ia, when both occur in the same galaxy or galaxy cluster. The current measurement of distances by the advanced LIGO and Virgo detector network suffers from large statistical errors ( 50%). However, we find that using a third genera- tion gravitational-wave detector network, standard∼ sirens will allow us to measure distances with an accuracy of 0:1%-3% for sources within 300 Mpc. These are much smaller than the dominant systematic error∼ of 5% due to radial peculiar≤ velocity of host galaxies. Therefore, gravitational-wave observations could∼ soon add a new cosmic distance ladder for an independent calibration of distances to SNe Ia. Subject headings: gravitation|gravitational waves|galaxies: supernovae|cosmology: observations| cosmology 1. INTRODUCTION Distances can be measured using a standard candle | The geometry and dynamics of the universe can be in- a source whose intrinsic luminosity is well constrained, ferred by two key ingredients obtained for a population so that its measured flux can be used to infer its dis- of cosmological sources: precise measurement of their tance. Calibration of distance to astronomical sources redshift and accurate estimation of their luminosity dis- typically uses a \distance ladder" of multiple steps to get from nearby sources to those at cosmological distances. tance. The luminosity distance DL to a source at a red- shift z depends on a number of parameters such as the For example, in the most precise recent approach, nearby Hubble-Lema^ıtreparameter H ; dimensionless dark mat- Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) are calibrated via the \stan- 0 dard candle" behavior of Cepheid variable stars (Riess arXiv:1907.09897v2 [astro-ph.CO] 8 Oct 2019 ter and dark energy densities ΩM and ΩΛ; dark energy equation of state parameter w (which may itself depend et al. 2019). The Leavitt Law enabling determination of Cepheid luminosities from their periods is calibrated on redshift), and the curvature of space Ωk: One can fit a cosmological model D (z; ~p) to a set of, say n, mea- in the Milky Way galaxy via Cepheid parallaxes (Riess L et al. 2018); in the Large Magellanic Cloud via obser- surements D` ; z ; ` = 1; : : : ; n and hence determine L ` vations of detached eclipsing binary systems (Pietrzyski the parametersf ~p =g (H ; Ω ; Ω ; Ω ; w): It is apparent 0 M Λ k et al. 2013); and in the \megamaser" galaxy NGC 4258 that to do so one must obtain an unbiased measurement which has a known geometric distance from radio obser- of the distances and redshifts at cosmological scales. vations (Humphreys et al. 2013). 1.1. Standard Candles 1.2. Gravitational Wave Standard Sirens Observation of gravitational waves (GWs) has opened [email protected] [email protected] up the possibility of accurately measuring distances on [email protected] all scales independent of the cosmic distance ladder. In- SchutzBF@cardiff.ac.uk deed, binary black holes and binary neutron stars are now 2 being used to infer both the absolute and apparent lumi- galaxies (Gehrels et al. 2016; Nair et al. 2018). Assum- nosity of the source: the rate at which the emitted wave's ing the merger came from any of the galaxies within the frequency chirps up as it sweeps through the sensitivity error-box would lead to multiple values of H0 for a sin- band of a detector gives the source's intrinsic luminos- gle merger. With a large enough population of events ity and the measured wave's amplitude gives the source's one gets a distribution of measured values of H0 which apparent luminosity. Combining the two we can infer the will peak at its true value. This way of estimating H0 source's luminosity distance. The frequency evolution of is known as statistical method and it does not require the wave is completely determined by general relativity: GW events to have an electromagnetic counterpart. Al- it depends on the source's masses and spins, which are ternatively, if electromagnetic follow-up observations in also measured via the wave's amplitude and frequency the sky position error-box of a merger identify a counter- evolution in a network of detectors. Apart from general part then it would be possible to directly obtain source's relativity, no detailed modeling of the source is required redshift (Dalal et al. 2006) and hence directly infer the in this measurement. Hubble-Lema^ıtre parameter. Either of these methods The apparent luminosity of the source (basically the requires accurate knowledge of the sky position of the strain amplitude) depends not only on the luminosity source, which could be obtained with a network of three distance but also the source's position on the sky and or more GW detectors. the orientation of the binary's orbit relative to the line of sight from the detector to the source. With a network of 1.4. Current Status of H0 Estimate three or more detectors it is, in principle, possible to infer Cepheid-based calibration of the nearby sample of all the unknown parameters of the source. In practice, SNe Ia enables the use of their counterpart SNe Ia however, the source's inclination is difficult to measure, on cosmological scales to measure the Hubble constant especially when the orbital plane is close to face-on or (Riess et al. 2016, 2019). This approach currently gives face-off relative to the detector. This causes the biggest −1 −1 H0 = 74:03 1:42 km s Mpc (Riess et al. 2019). uncertainty in the estimation of luminosity distance of Calibrating these± same supernovae via a largely indepen- the source. In Sec. 2, we briefly discuss various uncer- dent distance ladder based on the \tip of the red giant tainties in the measurement of the source's luminosity branch" (TRGB) approach yields H = 69:8 0:8 (stat) distance from their GW signal. 0 1:7 (sys) km s−1 Mpc−1 (Freedman et al. 2019).± Gravitational wave observations should be able to cali- ±An alternative geometric approach to distance mea- brate all the rungs of the cosmic distance ladder for every surement in the late universe, by the H0LiCOW team, galaxy or galaxy cluster that hosts a binary merger, and uses gravitational lensing time delays and careful mod- have potential to deliver new insights into the physics eling to derive a somewhat less precise single-step mea- of these rungs. For example, one can ask if the Dn{ σ +1:7 −1 relationship, one of the rungs of the distance ladder, is surement of the Hubble constant, H0 = 73:3−1:8 km s −1 metallicity-dependent. Moreover, are there systematic Mpc (Wong et al. 2019). variations due to the inclination of the galaxy that could Both of these H0 values are larger than those derived be resolved from GW observations? Among all the rungs from the Planck Collaboration's observations of the cos- of distance ladder, currently SNe Ia are the only ones mic microwave background (CMB), H0 = 67:4 0:5 km −1 −1 ± that can estimate extragalactic distances at very high s Mpc (Aghanim et al. 2018), and from the z . 2 redshifts (z 2:26, Rodney et al. (2015)) and have im- measurements of the Baryon Acoustic Oscillation (BAO) mense importance∼ in characterizing the cosmic expansion peak of the galaxy correlation function, as calibrated at z < 1 (Betoule et al. 2014; Scolnic et al. 2018). Ac- against the physical scale of the CMB acoustic peak. curate measurement of relative event-to-event distances The Dark Energy Survey (DES), for example, recently re- −1 −1 to SNe Ia can be achieved via their well-characterized ported H0 = 67:77 1:30 km s Mpc (Macaulay et al. multicolor light curve shapes (Riess et al. 1996) or, near- 2018), while a joint± analysis of several recent BAO results −1 equivalently, their peak luminosity{decline rate correla- by Addison et al. (2018) gives H0 = 66:98 1:18 km s −1 ± tion (Phillips et al. 1999). However, while precise relative Mpc . Thus, present H0 estimates can be divided into calibration suffices to characterize the recent cosmic ex- two categories: early universe and CMB-calibrated esti- pansion history to high-precision, thanks to the linearity mates (CMB, BAO) which tend low, and late universe of the Hubble relation at z .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Impact of the Astro2010 Recommendations on Variable Star Science
    The Impact of the Astro2010 Recommendations on Variable Star Science Corresponding Authors Lucianne M. Walkowicz Department of Astronomy, University of California Berkeley [email protected] phone: (510) 642–6931 Andrew C. Becker Department of Astronomy, University of Washington [email protected] phone: (206) 685–0542 Authors Scott F. Anderson, Department of Astronomy, University of Washington Joshua S. Bloom, Department of Astronomy, University of California Berkeley Leonid Georgiev, Universidad Autonoma de Mexico Josh Grindlay, Harvard–Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Steve Howell, National Optical Astronomy Observatory Knox Long, Space Telescope Science Institute Anjum Mukadam, Department of Astronomy, University of Washington Andrej Prsa,ˇ Villanova University Joshua Pepper, Villanova University Arne Rau, California Institute of Technology Branimir Sesar, Department of Astronomy, University of Washington Nicole Silvestri, Department of Astronomy, University of Washington Nathan Smith, Department of Astronomy, University of California Berkeley Keivan Stassun, Vanderbilt University Paula Szkody, Department of Astronomy, University of Washington Science Frontier Panels: Stars and Stellar Evolution (SSE) February 16, 2009 Abstract The next decade of survey astronomy has the potential to transform our knowledge of variable stars. Stellar variability underpins our knowledge of the cosmological distance ladder, and provides direct tests of stellar formation and evolution theory. Variable stars can also be used to probe the fundamental physics of gravity and degenerate material in ways that are otherwise impossible in the laboratory. The computational and engineering advances of the past decade have made large–scale, time–domain surveys an immediate reality. Some surveys proposed for the next decade promise to gather more data than in the prior cumulative history of astronomy.
    [Show full text]
  • Distances and Magnitudes Distance Measurements the Cosmic Distance
    Distances and Magnitudes Prof Andy Lawrence Astronomy 1G 2011-12 Distance Measurements Astronomy 1G 2011-12 The cosmic distance ladder • Distance measurements in astronomy are a chain, with each type of measurement relative to the one before • The bottom rung is the Astronomical Unit (AU), the (mean) distance between the Earth and the Sun • Many distance estimates rely on the idea of a "standard candle" or "standard yardstick" Astronomy 1G 2011-12 Distances in the solar system • relative distances to planets given by periods + Keplers law (see Lecture-2) • distance to Venus measured by radar • Sun-Earth = 1 A.U. (average) • Sun-Jupiter = 5 A.U. (average) • Sun-Neptune = 30 A.U. (average) • Sun- Oort cloud (comets) ~ 50,000 A.U. • 1 A.U. = 1.496 x 1011 m Astronomy 1G 2011-12 Distances to nearest stars • parallax against more distant non- moving stars • 1 parsec (pc) is defined as distance where parallax = 1 second of arc in standard units D = a/✓ (radians, metres) in AU and arcsec D(AU) = 1/✓rad = 206, 265/✓00 in parsec and arcsec D(pc) = 1/✓00 nearest star Proxima Centauri 1.30pc Very hard to measure less than 0.1" 1pc = 206,265 AU = 3.086 x 1016m so only good for stars a few parsecs away... until launch of GAIA mission in 2014..... Astronomy 1G 2011-12 More distant stars : standard candle technique If a star has luminosity L (total energy emitted per sec) then at L distance D we will observe flux density F (i.e. energy per second F = 2 per sq.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Candles in Cosmology
    Standard Candles: Distance Measurement in Astronomy Farley V. Ferrante Southern Methodist University 5/3/2017 PHYS 3368: Principles of Astrophysics & Cosmology 1 OUTLINE • Cosmic Distance Ladder • Standard Candles Parallax Cepheid variables Planetary nebula Most luminous supergiants Most luminous globular clusters Most luminous H II regions Supernovae Hubble constant & red shift • Standard Model of Cosmology 5/3/2017 PHYS 3368: Principles of Astrophysics & Cosmology 2 The Cosmic Distance Ladder - Distances far too vast to be measured directly - Several methods of indirect measurement - Clever methods relying on careful observation and basic mathematics - Cosmic distance ladder: A progression of indirect methods which scale, overlap, & calibrate parameters for large distances in terms of smaller distances • More methods calibrate these distances until distances that can be measured directly are achieved 5/3/2017 PHYS 3368: Principles of Astrophysics & Cosmology 3 Standard Candles • Magnitude: Historical unit (Hipparchus) of stellar brightness such that 5 magnitudes represents a factor of 100 in intensity • Apparent magnitude: Number assigned to visual brightness of an object; originally a scale of 1-6 • Absolute magnitude: Magnitude an object would have at 10 pc (convenient distance for comparison) • List of most luminous stars 5/3/2017 PHYS 3368: Principles of Astrophysics & Cosmology 4 5/3/2017 PHYS 3368: Principles of Astrophysics & Cosmology 5 The Cosmic Distance Ladder 5/3/2017 PHYS 3368: Principles of Astrophysics & Cosmology 6 The
    [Show full text]
  • 5. Cosmic Distance Ladder Ii: Standard Candles
    5. COSMIC DISTANCE LADDER II: STANDARD CANDLES EQUIPMENT Computer with internet connection GOALS In this lab, you will learn: 1. How to use RR Lyrae variable stars to measures distances to objects within the Milky Way galaxy. 2. How to use Cepheid variable stars to measure distances to nearby galaxies. 3. How to use Type Ia supernovae to measure distances to faraway galaxies. 1 BACKGROUND A. MAGNITUDES Astronomers use apparent magnitudes , which are often referred to simply as magnitudes, to measure brightness: The more negative the magnitude, the brighter the object. The more positive the magnitude, the fainter the object. In the following tutorial, you will learn how to measure, or photometer , uncalibrated magnitudes: http://skynet.unc.edu/ASTR101L/videos/photometry/ 2 In Afterglow, go to “File”, “Open Image(s)”, “Sample Images”, “Astro 101 Lab”, “Lab 5 – Standard Candles”, “CD-47” and open the image “CD-47 8676”. Measure the uncalibrated magnitude of star A: uncalibrated magnitude of star A: ____________________ Uncalibrated magnitudes are always off by a constant and this constant varies from image to image, depending on observing conditions among other things. To calibrate an uncalibrated magnitude, one must first measure this constant, which we do by photometering a reference star of known magnitude: uncalibrated magnitude of reference star: ____________________ 3 The known, true magnitude of the reference star is 12.01. Calculate the correction constant: correction constant = true magnitude of reference star – uncalibrated magnitude of reference star correction constant: ____________________ Finally, calibrate the uncalibrated magnitude of star A by adding the correction constant to it: calibrated magnitude = uncalibrated magnitude + correction constant calibrated magnitude of star A: ____________________ The true magnitude of star A is 13.74.
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomy (ASTR) 1
    Astronomy (ASTR) 1 ASTR 330 The Cosmic Distance Scale 3 Credit Hours ASTRONOMY (ASTR) An exploration of the cosmic distance ladder focusing on the systems and techniques that astronomers use in establishing the distances to ASTR 130 Introduction to Astronomy 3 Credit Hours celestial objects. Direct measures using radar ranging and trigonometric A one-term introduction for those interested in learning about the present parallax will be discussed for objects in the solar system and for stars state of knowledge of the Universe, its origin, evolution, organization, within about 3000 light-years of the Sun, respectively. For more remote and ultimate fate. Exciting new discoveries concerning extrasolar systems in or just outside the Milky Way, methods based spectroscopic planets, star birth, supermassive black holes, dark matter/dark energy, parallax and the period-luminosity relation for various types of variable and cosmology are discussed. Two years of high school math or its stars will be introduced. For the extra-galactic objects, use of the Hubble equivalent recommended. relation and the light curves of Type Ia supernovae will be made to assess ASTR 131 Introductory Astronomy Lab 1 Credit Hour the distances. At each rung of the ladder, emphasis will be placed on the An introduction to some of the important observational techniques and astrophysical principles and processes underlying the methodology being analytical methods used by astronomers. Ground-based and satellite applied. 3 hours lecture data will be used to reveal physical and chemical properties of the moon, Prerequisite(s): (MATH 113 or MATH 115) and (PHYS 126 or PHYS 151) planets, stars, and the Milky Way.
    [Show full text]
  • Cosmic Distance Ladder
    Cosmic Distance Ladder How do we know the distances to objects in space? Jason Nishiyama Cosmic Distance Ladder Space is vast and the techniques of the cosmic distance ladder help us measure that vastness. Units of Distance Metre (m) – base unit of SI. 11 Astronomical Unit (AU) - 1.496x10 m 15 Light Year (ly) – 9.461x10 m / 63 239 AU 16 Parsec (pc) – 3.086x10 m / 3.26 ly Radius of the Earth Eratosthenes worked out the size of the Earth around 240 BCE Radius of the Earth Eratosthenes used an observation and simple geometry to determine the Earth's circumference He noted that on the summer solstice that the bottom of wells in Alexandria were in shadow While wells in Syene were lit by the Sun Radius of the Earth From this observation, Eratosthenes was able to ● Deduce the Earth was round. ● Using the angle of the shadow, compute the circumference of the Earth! Out to the Solar System In the early 1500's, Nicholas Copernicus used geometry to determine orbital radii of the planets. Planets by Geometry By measuring the angle of a planet when at its greatest elongation, Copernicus solved a triangle and worked out the planet's distance from the Sun. Kepler's Laws Johann Kepler derived three laws of planetary motion in the early 1600's. One of these laws can be used to determine the radii of the planetary orbits. Kepler III Kepler's third law states that the square of the planet's period is equal to the cube of their distance from the Sun.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2007.02883V2 [Astro-Ph.CO] 22 Dec 2020
    Draft version December 23, 2020 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX63 Dark Sirens to Resolve the Hubble-Lemaître Tension Ssohrab Borhanian,1 Arnab Dhani,1 Anuradha Gupta,2 K. G. Arun,3 and B. S. Sathyaprakash1, 4, 5 1Institute for Gravitation and the Cosmos, Department of Physics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA 2Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS 38677, USA 3Chennai Mathematical Institute, Siruseri, 603103, India 4Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA 5School of Physics and Astronomy, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK, CF24 3AA ABSTRACT The planned sensitivity upgrades to the LIGO and Virgo facilities could uniquely identify host galaxies of dark sirens—compact binary coalescences without any electromagnetic counterparts—within a redshift of z = 0:1. This is aided by the higher order spherical harmonic modes present in the gravitational-wave signal, which also improve distance estimation. In conjunction, sensitivity upgrades and higher modes will facilitate an accurate, independent measurement of the host galaxy’s redshift in addition to the luminosity distance from the gravitational wave observation to infer the Hubble- Lemaître constant H0 to better than a few percent in five years. A possible Voyager upgrade or third generation facilities would further solidify the role of dark sirens for precision cosmology in the future. Keywords: Gravitational waves, dark sirens, cosmology, Hubble-Lemaître tension. 1. INTRODUCTION Hotokezaka et al.(2019); Dhawan et al.(2019)). This measurement crucially relied on the coincident detec- The Hubble-Lemaître constant H0 is a fundamental cosmological quantity that governs the expansion rate of tion of an electromagnetic (EM) counterpart to the GW source.
    [Show full text]
  • Four Ways of Doing Cosmography with Gravitational Waves
    Four ways of doing cosmography with gravitational waves Chris Van Den Broeck National Institute for Subatomic Physics Amsterdam, The Netherlands StronG BaD Workshop, Oxford, Mississippi, 27 February - 2 March, 2017 LISA Cosmography recap § Hubble parameter: § Fractional densities of matter, radiation, spatial curvature, dark energy: Dark energy equation of state: § Luminosity distance as a function of redshift ( ): Cosmography: determining by fitting LISA Cosmography recap § Luminosity distance as a function of redshift: Cosmography: determining by fitting § Example using Type Ia supernovae: ● Intrinsic luminosity believed known → from observed luminosity ● Redshift from spectrum Weinberg et al., Phys. Rept. 530, 87 (2013) LISA Cosmography recap § Luminosity distance as a function of redshift: Cosmography: determining by fitting § In most of this presentation: → Dark energy equation of state: LISA Cosmic distance ladder § Commonly used distance markers (like Type Ia supernovae) need calibration → Cosmic distance ladder LISA Compact binary inspirals as “standard sirens” § Gravitational wave amplitude during inspiral: § From the gravitational wave phase one separately obtains ● Chirp mass ● Instantaneous frequency § The function depends on sky position and orientation ● Sky position : EM counterpart, or multiple detectors ● Orientation : multiple detectors → Possibility of extracting distance from the signal itself → No need for cosmic distance ladder But: Fitting of also requires separate determination of redshift LISA 1. Redshift from electromagnetic counterparts LISA 1. Redshift from EM counterparts § Short-hard gamma ray bursts (GRBs) are assumed to result from NS-NS or NS-BH mergers ● If localizable on the sky: , and host galaxy identification would provide ● With multiple detectors: – Beaming of the GRB: § At redshifts accessible to 2nd generation detectors: ● If redshift can be determined with negligible error then with a single source, uncertainty is ● With multiple sources, accuracy improves roughly as – With 50 NS-NS events: Nissanke et al., Astrophys.
    [Show full text]
  • Rulers of the Universe
    Rulers of the Universe Thomas Kennedy In the study of astronomy, there are very improvised ruler gets too heavy for even few things more important than the tremendous binding power of Flex distances. Distances are needed to get Tape to stop it from collapsing). After luminosity, size, and to explore the this, however, you’ll have to rethink development of the universe as a whole! your approach. No single method can be But how do astronomers find out how far used to find the distances to all the away things are on intergalactic scales? ranges that we need. To solve this The answer, of course, is to combine problem, astronomers had to build every yardstick and tape measure we can outward from our planet, adopting get our hands on! That ought to work for different methods and calibrating as a few hundred feet (until your they went. Because these steps take us Figure 1 A visual representation of the cosmic distance ladder Photo credit: NASA, ESA, A. Feild (STScI), and A. Riess (STScI/JHU) higher and higher above the Earth, we and that’s why you automatically know call them rungs of the “cosmic distance how far away your coffee mug is! This ladder.” 1 (see Figure 1) works quite well up close, but “eyeballing” the distance to a star The first rung is one that you are doesn’t work as well, because your eyes probably familiar with-- radar! What are much closer to one another than echolocation is to sound, radar is to light. they are to outer space.
    [Show full text]
  • Not Yet Imagined: a Study of Hubble Space Telescope Operations
    NOT YET IMAGINED A STUDY OF HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE OPERATIONS CHRISTOPHER GAINOR NOT YET IMAGINED NOT YET IMAGINED A STUDY OF HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE OPERATIONS CHRISTOPHER GAINOR National Aeronautics and Space Administration Office of Communications NASA History Division Washington, DC 20546 NASA SP-2020-4237 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Gainor, Christopher, author. | United States. NASA History Program Office, publisher. Title: Not Yet Imagined : A study of Hubble Space Telescope Operations / Christopher Gainor. Description: Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Office of Communications, NASA History Division, [2020] | Series: NASA history series ; sp-2020-4237 | Includes bibliographical references and index. | Summary: “Dr. Christopher Gainor’s Not Yet Imagined documents the history of NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope (HST) from launch in 1990 through 2020. This is considered a follow-on book to Robert W. Smith’s The Space Telescope: A Study of NASA, Science, Technology, and Politics, which recorded the development history of HST. Dr. Gainor’s book will be suitable for a general audience, while also being scholarly. Highly visible interactions among the general public, astronomers, engineers, govern- ment officials, and members of Congress about HST’s servicing missions by Space Shuttle crews is a central theme of this history book. Beyond the glare of public attention, the evolution of HST becoming a model of supranational cooperation amongst scientists is a second central theme. Third, the decision-making behind the changes in Hubble’s instrument packages on servicing missions is chronicled, along with HST’s contributions to our knowledge about our solar system, our galaxy, and our universe.
    [Show full text]
  • 8.901 Lecture Notes Astrophysics I, Spring 2019
    8.901 Lecture Notes Astrophysics I, Spring 2019 I.J.M. Crossfield (with S. Hughes and E. Mills)* MIT 6th February, 2019 – 15th May, 2019 Contents 1 Introduction to Astronomy and Astrophysics 6 2 The Two-Body Problem and Kepler’s Laws 10 3 The Two-Body Problem, Continued 14 4 Binary Systems 21 4.1 Empirical Facts about binaries................... 21 4.2 Parameterization of Binary Orbits................. 21 4.3 Binary Observations......................... 22 5 Gravitational Waves 25 5.1 Gravitational Radiation........................ 27 5.2 Practical Effects............................ 28 6 Radiation 30 6.1 Radiation from Space......................... 30 6.2 Conservation of Specific Intensity................. 33 6.3 Blackbody Radiation......................... 36 6.4 Radiation, Luminosity, and Temperature............. 37 7 Radiative Transfer 38 7.1 The Equation of Radiative Transfer................. 38 7.2 Solutions to the Radiative Transfer Equation........... 40 7.3 Kirchhoff’s Laws........................... 41 8 Stellar Classification, Spectra, and Some Thermodynamics 44 8.1 Classification.............................. 44 8.2 Thermodynamic Equilibrium.................... 46 8.3 Local Thermodynamic Equilibrium................ 47 8.4 Stellar Lines and Atomic Populations............... 48 *[email protected] 1 Contents 8.5 The Saha Equation.......................... 48 9 Stellar Atmospheres 54 9.1 The Plane-parallel Approximation................. 54 9.2 Gray Atmosphere........................... 56 9.3 The Eddington Approximation................... 59 9.4 Frequency-Dependent Quantities.................. 61 9.5 Opacities................................ 62 10 Timescales in Stellar Interiors 67 10.1 Photon collisions with matter.................... 67 10.2 Gravity and the free-fall timescale................. 68 10.3 The sound-crossing time....................... 71 10.4 Radiation transport.......................... 72 10.5 Thermal (Kelvin-Helmholtz) timescale............... 72 10.6 Nuclear timescale..........................
    [Show full text]
  • The Cosmic Distance Scale
    The cosmic distance scale Introduction to Galaxies and Cosmology (AS3001) - Laboratory exercise 1 - Magnus Galfalk˚ Stockholm Observatory 2008 1 1 Introduction The extragalactic distance scale is one of the fundamental topics of cosmology. This relates to all distances outside our galaxy, from nearby satellite galaxies through galaxy clusters all the way to the limit of our observable universe. Accurate measurements of extragalactic distances are needed to determine the age, size, structure and fate of the universe as well as estimating fundamental quantities like the amount of dark matter and the primordial densities of Hydrogen and Helium. In this laboratory exercise we will first use observations from the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) to calculate the distance to a galaxy called M100 in the nearby Virgo cluster of galaxies using so-called Cepheid variable stars. This will be done with a little help from a program written for this lab (called Cepheid) used to measure periods, magnitudes and to make plots of the Cepheids. We will then calculate distances to very far away galaxies using supernovas (these are very bright which means they can be seen over large distances). And finally, if all goes well, we will use this (together with velocities of the same galaxies) to calculate the expansion rate of the universe! But let us start with some preparatory exercises as a warm-up. 2 Preparatory exercises Over the years a number of distance estimators have been found. Most methods rely on objects that can be used as so-called ’standard candles’. This is important since if we know how bright an object looks (apparent magnitude m) and how bright it really is (absolute magnitude M) we can calculate its distance.
    [Show full text]