SUMMER TERM 2020 Inside Priorissue THREE Welcome from Coping During the Editor Covid-19 As a School Welcome to Prior Park School’S Third Edition of Inside Prior
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Compte-Rendu
REPUBLIQUE FRANÇAISE DEPARTEMENT DU RHONE VILLE DE LYON EXTRAIT DU REGISTRE DES DELIBERATIONS DU CONSEIL MUNICIPAL Direction des Assemblées SEANCE DU CONSEIL MUNICIPAL DU 28 SEPTEMBRE 2015 - Désignation d’un secrétaire de séance : Conformément à l’article L 2121-15 du Code Général des Collectivités Territoriales, le Conseil municipal a désigné à l’unanimité comme secrétaire de séance, par vote à main levée : Mme Mina HAJRI. - Appel nominal : L’appel nominal étant terminé, le Conseil municipal a pris acte qu’à l’ouverture de la séance, le quorum est atteint. - Les procès-verbaux des séances des Conseils des 1 er juin et 9 juillet 2015, parus au Bulletin municipal officiel des 6 juillet et 21 septembre 2015 sont adoptés (avec le rectificatif d‘horaire). - Compte rendu des décisions prises par M. le Maire en vertu de la délégation qui lui a été accordée par délibération de principe n° 2014/4 du 4 avril 2014, conformément à l’article L 2122-22 du Code Général des Collectivités Territoriales. - L’urgence sur le rapport 2015/1524 : « Approbation d’un contrat entre la Ville de Lyon (service archéologique) et la « SNC Hôtel-Dieu Réalisation » pour la réalisation des fouilles archéologiques de la tranche 6 (cour de la pharmacie) de l’opération de reconversion de l’Hôtel Dieu à Lyon 2 » est adoptée. - Communication de M. le Maire sur le « Rapport d’observations définitives de la Chambre Régionale des Comptes d’Auvergne, Rhône-Alpes sur l’examen de la gestion de l’Association « Les Nouvelles Subsistances », pour les exercices 2008 à 2013. * * * - Désignations : M. -
Design a Study Solutions Research Methods
OCR A Level Psychology Design a study solutions Research Methods www.tutor2u.net/psychology OCR A LEVEL Psychology design a study solutions: RESEARCH METHODS Page 5 SAMPLE QUSTION: SELF‐REPORT THE EFFECTS OF FACEBOOK USE Explain how you would carry out a self‐report to investigate the effects of Facebook use. You must refer to: . a questionnaire or an interview . open or closed questions . how you may check the reliability of responses (12 marks) You should use your own experience of carrying out an experiment to inform your response. Justify your decisions as part of your explanation. Task: Read the answer below and highlight in a different colour, where the answer addresses each of the following points: 1. Addressing all of the required features (the 3/4 bullet points) o a questionnaire or an interview o open or closed questions o how you may check the reliability of responses 2. Justifying your design decisions 3. Contextualising your answer – applying your knowledge to the scenario 4. Explicitly linking your design decisions to your own practical work Sample Answer For my investigation into the effects of Facebook use, I would carry out a questionnaire. The reason for this is that compared to an interview, they are a much quicker way of getting a large amount of data from many participants. This is because they just need to be handed out and returned; interviews are much more time consuming as interviewees are questioned one at a time, so the number of participants is also going be less than with a questionnaire. I found this out when I carried out my research at school into attitudes towards mental health in different age groups. -
(PDF) Understanding the Foundation Stage
Contents Introduction 1 The Rationale of the Foundation Stage • The Characteristics of the Foundation Stage 2 • The Aims of the Foundation Stage 3 • The Principles Underpinning the Foundation Stage 4 • The Curriculum in the Foundation Stage 5 Creating an Effective Learning Environment • The Approach to Learning and Teaching in the Foundation Stage 6 • Adults’ Role in Promoting Learning 7 • Learning Partnerships 7 • The Physical Environment 8 Learning, Teaching and Assessment • The Learning, Teaching and Assessment Cycle in the Foundation Stage 9 • Planning in the Foundation Stage 11 • Assessment for Learning in the Foundation Stage 13 • Observation and Assessment in the Foundation Stage 13 • The Pupil Profile in the Foundation Stage 15 Acknowledgements This material has been developed in collaboration with the Early Years Interboard Group. Understanding the Foundation Stage Introduction The Foundation Stage Years 1 & 2 in the primary school The purpose of this guidance is to provide information related to good practice in the Foundation Stage. It outlines the approach to learning, teaching and assessment and should be used to support the review, development and improvement of existing provision and practice. Young children come to school from a variety of different backgrounds, having had a range of diverse learning experiences at home and for most, some form of pre-school education. The Foundation Stage aims to build on these learning experiences by providing children with an appropriate learning programme to develop their dispositions to learn and to provide them with the skills and competencies they will need to succeed in school and future life. The Foundation Stage also endorses good early years practice where teachers have more flexibility in terms of what they teach. -
The Sciences at Key Stage 4: Time for a Re-Think? Why Key Stage 4 Is So Important, and Why Changes Are Needed
The sciences at key stage 4: time for a re-think? Why key stage 4 is so important, and why changes are needed Key stage 4 is a pivotal period of time in a student’s chemistry and biology are currently the preserve of school life; it is the point at which they make subject a minority. There is evidence that the existence of choices that define their future study, as well as their multiple routes through key stage 4 disadvantages a last experience of those subjects that they do not large number of students in both their experiences and choose to take further. The sciences are core subjects the choices that are taken away from them. For this to 16, yet multiple qualifications exist for students reason, the SCORE organisations are proposing that of this age. As this discussion paper documents, there should be a single route in the sciences for all evidence suggests that rich opportunities in physics, students up to the age of 16. SCORE’sSCORE’s proposal: proposal: a asingle single route route in in the the sciences sciences SCORE’sSCORE’s vision vision is thatis that opportunities opportunities for forhigh-quality high-quality studyexciting of the sciences and inspiring are available experience to all, of onthe an sciences, studyequitable of the sciencesbasis, and are we available believe thatto all, this on can an only be achievedproviding by the them creation with ofthe a skillssingle and route knowledge at key to equitablestage 4. basis, This singleand we route believe would that remove this can the only need for decisionssucceed to be in madetheir future at 14 endeavours,that could limit whether students’ or not be futureachieved choices, by the and creation give all of students a single routean authentic, at key excitingthey and decideinspiring to experience pursue the ofsciences the sciences, beyond 16. -
Heat Radio Presenter Profiles
MEDIA PACK The Radio On air – heat radio brings the voice of the brand to life with the music soundtrack to your workday. With the sparkle and fizz of a cheeky prosecco it MISSION is bursting with energy, celebrity interviews and presenters who live, breathe, sleep the heat brand. Print From our award winning breakfast show presenter Heat is the brand that sets Emily Segal to Mr Hollywood Ryan Seacrest and Made In Chelsea’s Jamie Laing. We have your the agenda of popular culture In print – we bring readers a truly unique, quality entertainment week covered. and fuels conversation experience. From clever A-list access shoots no around the rich and famous other magazine could pull off , to the real story behind celeb news – heat has the celeb contacts to Now a huge multi platform brand - give readers the exclusive every time. unrivalled in the entertainment market - the heat universe comprises the magazine Our Unmissable entertainment edit is led by as the mothership with a radio station, huge our hugely credible team of experts – including online and social media platforms and not BAFTA judge Boyd Hilton – helping readers one but two entertainment podcasts. navigate the tricksy world of TV and streaming. Our style section – Wear It’s At – combines an aspirational yet affordable weekly fashion edit with the real, trusted voice of the heat brand. Digital Our all-inclusive approach promises style for Across our digital platforms – we deliver breaking everybody, no matter what shape or size, and our news, funny, engaging and exclusive content – team test fashion and beauty products to make whether that’s live streaming Love Island’s Under sure readers spend their hard-earned pennies the Duvet, instagramming interviews of stars on wisely. -
Social Selectivity of State Schools and the Impact of Grammars
_____________________________________________________________________________ Social selectivity of state schools and the impact of grammars A summary and discussion of findings from ‘Evidence on the effects of selective educational systems’ by the Centre for Evaluation and Monitoring at Durham University The Sutton Trust, October 2008 Contents Executive summary 3 Introduction and background 5 Findings -- selectivity 7 Findings – pupil intakes 10 Findings – attainment 12 Discussion 13 Proposed ways forward 16 Appendix 18 2 Executive summary Overview This study shows that the vast majority of England's most socially selective state secondary schools are non-grammar schools. However, England's remaining grammar schools are enrolling half as many academically able children from disadvantaged backgrounds as they could do. The research also concludes that the impact on the academic results of non-grammar state schools due to the ‘creaming off’ of pupils to grammar schools is negligible. Grammars have a widespread, low-level, impact on pupil enrolments across the sector. A relatively small number of non-selective schools do see a significant proportion of pupils ‘lost’ to nearby grammars, but this does not lead to lower academic achievement. The Trust proposes that a further study be undertaken to review ‘eleven plus’ selection tests to see whether they deter bright pupils from disadvantaged backgrounds applying to grammar schools, and urges more grammars to develop outreach schemes to raise the aspirations and achievement of children during primary school. It also backs calls for religious schools to consider straightforward 'binary' criteria to decide which pupils should be admitted on faith grounds, and other ways – including the use of banding and ballots – to help make admissions to all secondary state schools operate more equitably. -
Opening a Studio School a Guide for Studio School Proposer Groups on the Pre-Opening Stage
Opening a studio school A guide for studio school proposer groups on the pre-opening stage August 2014 Contents Introduction 3 Section 1 - Who does what - roles and responsibilities? 5 Section 2 - Managing your project 10 Section 3 – Governance 12 Section 4 - Pupil recruitment and admissions 21 Section 5 - Statutory consultation 33 Section 6 - Staffing and education plans 36 Section 7 - Site and buildings 42 Section 8 – Finance 56 Section 9 - Procurement and additional support 63 Section 10 - Funding Agreement 67 Section 11 - The equality duty 71 Section 12 - Preparing to open 73 Section 13 - Once your school is open 80 Annex A - RSC regions and Local authorities 82 2 Introduction Congratulations! All your planning and preparation has paid off, and the Secretary of State for Education has agreed that your application to open a studio school should move to the next stage of the process – known as the ‘pre-opening’ stage. This is the stage between the approval of your application and the opening of the school. The setting up of a studio school is a challenging but ultimately very rewarding task and it will require significant commitment and time from sponsors and partners. Your original application set out your plans for establishing the studio school, from the education vision and the admission of pupils to the recruitment of staff and the curriculum. Now your application has been approved, you must begin work to implement these plans. The letter of approval you received from the Department for Education (DfE) sets out important conditions of approval. It is vital that you consider these conditions carefully in planning your priorities and what you need to focus on next. -
The National Curriculum in England Key Stages 1 and 2 Framework Document
The national curriculum in England Key stages 1 and 2 framework document September 2013 Contents 1. Introduction 4 2. The school curriculum in England 5 3. The national curriculum in England 6 4. Inclusion 8 5. Numeracy and mathematics 9 6. Language and literacy 10 7. Programmes of study and attainment targets 12 English 13 Spoken language – years 1 to 6 17 Key stage 1 – year 1 19 Key stage 1 – year 2 26 Lower key stage 2 – years 3 and 4 33 Upper key stage 2 – years 5 and 6 41 English Appendix 1: Spelling 49 Spelling – work for year 1 50 Spelling – work for year 2 55 Spelling – work for years 3 and 4 59 Word list – years 3 and 4 64 Spelling – years 5 and 6 66 Word list – years 5 and 6 71 International Phonetic Alphabet (non-statutory) 73 English Appendix 2: Vocabulary, grammar and punctuation 74 Glossary for the programmes of study for English (non-statutory) 80 Mathematics 99 Key stage 1 – years 1 and 2 101 Year 1 programme of study 102 Year 2 programme of study 107 Lower key stage 2 – years 3 and 4 113 Year 3 programme of study 114 Year 4 programme of study 120 2 Upper key stage 2 – years 5 and 6 126 Year 5 programme of study 127 Year 6 programme of study 135 Mathematics Appendix 1: Examples of formal written methods for addition, subtraction, multiplication and division 142 Science 144 Key stage 1 146 Key stage 1 programme of study – years 1 and 2 147 Year 1 programme of study 148 Year 2 programme of study 151 Lower key stage 2 – years 3 and 4 154 Lower key stage 2 programme of study 155 Year 3 programme of study 157 Year 4 programme of study 161 Upper key stage 2 – years 5 and 6 165 Upper key stage 2 programme of study 166 Year 5 programme of study 168 Year 6 programme of study 172 Art and design 176 Computing 178 Design and technology 180 Geography 184 History 188 Languages 193 Music 196 Physical education 198 3 1. -
Procès-Verbal De La Séance Publique Du Conseil Du 10 Décembre 2015
Procès-verbal de la séance publique du Conseil du 10 décembre 2015 SOMMAIRE Présidence de monsieur Gérard Collomb, Président (p. 10) Désignation d’un secrétaire de séance (p. 10, 89) Appel nominal (p. 10) Dépôts de pouvoirs pour absence momentanée (p. 10) Hommage aux victimes des attentats perpétrés à Paris le 13 novembre 2015 (p. 10) Adoption du procès-verbal de la séance publique du 21 septembre 2015 (p. 11) Compte-rendu des décisions prises par la Commission permanente du 12 octobre 2015 en vertu de la délégation de principe accordée par la délibération n° 2015-0004 du 16 janvier 2015 (dossier n° 2015-0774) (p. 11) Compte-rendu des décisions prises par monsieur le Président en vertu de la délégation de principe accordée par la délibération n° 2015-0003 du 16 janvier 2015 - Période du 1er au 30 octobre 2015 (dossier n° 2015-0775) (p. 11) Pacte de cohérence métropolitain (dossier n° 2015-0938) - Présentation et opérations de votes sur les amendements (p. 56) Annexe 1 - Projet Lyon Part-Dieu (dossiers n° 2015-0917, 2015-0918, 2015-0919) - Documents projetés lors de la présentation par monsieur le Vice-Président Le Faou (p. 144) Annexe 2 - Pacte de cohérence métropolitain (dossier n° 2015-0938) - Amendements présentés par : - l'Exécutif (n° 1) (p. 183) - le groupe de Réflexion et d'actions métropolitaines (GRAM) (n° 2 à 22) (p. 201) - le groupe Union des démocrates et indépendants (UDI) et apparentés (n° 23 à 30) (p. 213) - le groupe Communiste, parti de gauche et républicain (n° 31 à 52) (p. 217) - le groupe Les Républicains et apparentés (n° 53 à 81) (p. -
Sci-Fi Sisters with Attitude Television September 2013 1 LOVE TV? SO DO WE!
April 2021 Sky’s Intergalactic: Sci-fi sisters with attitude Television www.rts.org.uk September 2013 1 LOVE TV? SO DO WE! R o y a l T e l e v i s i o n S o c i e t y b u r s a r i e s o f f e r f i n a n c i a l s u p p o r t a n d m e n t o r i n g t o p e o p l e s t u d y i n g : TTEELLEEVVIISSIIOONN PPRROODDUUCCTTIIOONN JJOOUURRNNAALLIISSMM EENNGGIINNEEEERRIINNGG CCOOMMPPUUTTEERR SSCCIIEENNCCEE PPHHYYSSIICCSS MMAATTHHSS F i r s t y e a r a n d s o o n - t o - b e s t u d e n t s s t u d y i n g r e l e v a n t u n d e r g r a d u a t e a n d H N D c o u r s e s a t L e v e l 5 o r 6 a r e e n c o u r a g e d t o a p p l y . F i n d o u t m o r e a t r t s . o r g . u k / b u r s a r i e s # R T S B u r s a r i e s Journal of The Royal Television Society April 2021 l Volume 58/4 From the CEO It’s been all systems winners were “an incredibly diverse” Finally, I am delighted to announce go this past month selection. -
An Examination of the UK's Key Stage Tests' Reading Section Complexity
An Examination of the UK’s Key Stage Tests’ Reading Section Complexity Eleanor E. Sanford-Moore, Ph.D., Senior Vice President of Research; Heather Koons, Ph.D., Director of Research Services; and Laura Bush, Research Specialist The study examined the text complexity of the English reading The units of analysis in this study were the English reading pas- sections from Key Stage 1 and 2 tests from 2003 to 2016. The sages as presented in the reading section of the tests for (1) 2016 official sample sections from the Department for Educa- Key Stage 1, years 2003, 2004, and 2016 and (2) Key Stage 2 tion were also included. Three primary research questions were from years 2003 to 2016. Due to changes in test administration investigated: 1) How has the reading section text complexity through the years, the Key Stage 1 test was not administered changed over the years for Key Stage 1 and 2? 2) How closely for years 2005 through 2015. The study sample also includes aligned were the sample sections and administered sections DfE’s Key Stage 1 and Key Stage 2 sample reading sections for 2016? 3) Are the text complexity measures from the Key for 2016. The Key Stage 2 Levels 3-5 and 6 tests were discon- Stage 1 and 2 reading sections comparable to the median text tinued for 2016 and beyond. The final sample was comprised complexity measures from textbooks written for Years 2 and 6? of 77 reading passages. The results indicate that there has been little variation in the reading section complexity for Key Stage 1 through the three years of test administrations and that the text complexity of the 2016 reading section was closely aligned with that of the official Reading sections from each Key Stage 1 and 2 tests were sample section. -
Content Everywhere (2): Securing Canada’S Place in the Digital Future
Content Everywhere (2): Securing Canada’s Place in the Digital Future White Paper by Duopoly February, 2015 1 1 Table of Contents – Content Everywhere 2 1. Content Everywhere 2: Securing Canada’s Place in the Digital Future Introduction: a. Scope of the White Paper b. 'Videofication' of the Internet Takes Hold c. The Great Unbundling d. Canada Follows Suit e. What’s Different? Note: This paper has been prepared with the input of many entertainment and 2. What are the Major Trends? media industry leaders, listed in Appendix B. The authors thank these a. The US Leads the Way individuals for their contribution to this study. b. OTTs Surging Buying Power c. More Players Jump Into the Digital-First Game Funding for this study was provided by Ontario Media Development d. Smaller Players Pioneer Original Content Corporation, the Canada Media Fund and the Independent Production e. Old Media Races to Catch Up Fund. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the 3. Preliminary Findings From Industry Reviews views of Ontario Media Development Corporation, Canada Media Fund, the Government of Ontario or the Government of Canada, or the Independent 4. Case Studies Production Fund. The funders, the Governments of Ontario and Canada and a. Canada: Annedroids; Out With Dad; Bite on Mondo; CBC ComedyCoup; their agencies are in no way bound by the recommendations contained in b. US: East Los High; Frankenstein MD; Marco Polo this document. c. UK: Ripper Street; Portal; The Crown Version disponible en français dans trends.cmf-fmc.ca/fr 5.