DOCSLIB.ORG

PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS of FISHERS in WISCONSIN: an ATTITUDINAL STUDY by Gordy J. Krahn a Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS of FISHERS in WISCONSIN: an ATTITUDINAL STUDY by Gordy J. Krahn a Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment Of PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF FISHERS IN WISCONSIN: AN ATTITUDINAL STUDY by Gordy J. Krahn A Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree MASTER OF SCIENCE College of Natural Resources UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN Stevens Point, Wisconsin December 1999 APPROVED BY THE GRADUATE COMMITTEE OF: ,._., Christine L. fhomas Associate Dean for Academic Affairs Professor of Resource Management ,.// James W. Hardin / / Professor of Wildlife !L/ ! Eric M. Anderson Associate Professor of Wildlife Discipline Coordinator ii Abstract A survey questionnaire was distributed in May, 1998, to a random sample of northern Wisconsin residents to gather data on their attitudes toward fishers, knowledge of fisher behavior and feeding habits and attitudes toward trapping fishers. Fishers were extirpated from Wisconsin by 1932 and reintroduced in the 1950s to reduce damage to timber caused by porcupines. The sample (n=458) was divided into 4 special interest groups: Northern Wisconsin Residents (n=213), Small-Game Hunters (n=60), Trappers (n=l 13) and Forestry Personnel (n=72). Subgroups including pet owners (n=46), livestock owners (n=9) and small-game hunters (n=64) were identified in the Northern Wisconsin Residents group to analyze perceived threats fishers pose to small pets, small domestic livestock and small-game species. There was a significant difference (p<0.01) in the level of knowledge about fishers between the groups, but no significant difference (p=0.45) in the groups' attitudes toward fishers. Forestry Personnel had the highest level of knowledge about fisher habits, followed by Trappers, Small-Game Hunters and Northern Wisconsin Residents. A positive correlation (p<0.01) was exhibited between knowledge of fishers and attitudes toward fishers in the Northern Wisconsin Resident (r2=10 percent) and Trapper (r2=24 percent) groups and when all cases were combined (r2=8 percent). There was no significant correlation between knowledge and attitudes in Small-Game Hunters and Forestry Personnel (p=0.56 and p=0.74 respectively). Males demonstrated significantly higher knowledge of fishers than females (p<0.01), but there was no significant difference in attitudes toward fishers between genders (p=0.95). Respondents' level of education appeared to be a significant predictor of attitudes toward fishers (p<0.01) (r2=9 percent), but the size of the community where they resided did not (p=0.08) (r2= 2 percent). There was no significant difference (p=O. 78) between hunters and non-hunters in regard to whether they viewed fishers as a threat to small-game species. Nor was there a statistical difference between pet owners and non-pet owners (p=0.83). However, 66 percent of small-game hunters and 64.1 percent of non-small-game hunters believed that fishers were a threat to small­ game animals. Forty-one percent of pet owners and 39.5 percent of non-pet owners 111 indicated that they believed fishers were a threat to small pets. The majority of livestock owners (56.3 percent) viewed fishers as a threat to small domestic livestock, while 37.1 percent of non-livestock owners viewed them as a threat. However, there was no statistical difference (p=0.18) between livestock owners and those who did not own livestock. The majority in all groups approved of trapping fishers in response to nuisance complaints and for population control, but significantly fewer (p<0.01) Northern Wisconsin Residents favored trapping fishers for recreation (43 .2 percent strongly or moderately disapproved ) or to sell their fur (26. 7 percent strongly or moderately disapproved). All groups favored habitat improvement over reducing fisher populations, reducing the number of hunters or letting nature take its course as the most viable means of improving small-game populations. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I wish to thank the gracious members of my graduate committee-Dr. Christine L. Thomas, Dr. James Hardin and Eric Anderson-for their guidance and support throughout the long and arduous process of compiling this study. Their direction and feedback was invaluable in helping to formulate and carry out each stage of this project. I also wish to thank John Olson and Bruce Kohn of the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources for their willingness to share their professional views on the state of fishers and fisher management in Wisconsin. Few studies are possible without financial support and I am grateful to the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Wisconsin Trappers Association and Krause Publications for providing the funding for this undertaking. A project such as this is never the sole work of the individual whose signature graces the cover, but a combined effort of all of those involved, no matter how large or small the contribution. Thank you all. V TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ...................................................................................... .iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................ .iv LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................. vi LIST OF FIGlJRES ........................................................................... vii IN'fRODUCTION ............................................................................. 1 METHODS ........................................................................................ 11 Selection of Respondents ....................................................... 11 Survey Instrument .................................................................. 13 Statistical Tests ...................................................................... 14 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ........................................................ 15 Response Rates ...................................................................... 15 Attitudes Toward Fishers ....................................................... 16 Knowledge of Fishers .......................................................... .. 18 Trapping Fishers .................................................................... 20 The Fisher As a Perceived Threat.. ........................................ 24 SUMMARY ....................................................................................... 28 CONCLUSION .................................................................................. 30 FUTURE STUDIES ........................................................................... 33 LITERA TlJRE CITED ...................................................................... 35 vi LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Complaints Against Fishers Filed With USDA .................. 7 Table 2. Questionnaire Response Rates ............................................ 15 Table 3. Mean Attitude Scores For Special Interest Groups ............ 17 Table 4. Approval Ratings For Reasons To Trap Fishers ................. 23 vii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Fisher Food Habits Study .................................................. .5 Figure 2. Fisher Population Estimates And Harvest Numbers .......... 9 Figure 3. Respondents' Mean Knowledge Scores ............................ 19 Figure 4. Approval Ratings For Trapping Fishers ............................ 20 Figure 5. Options For Improving Small-Grune Populations ............. 25 viii LIST OF APPENDICES No. 1. Study Questionnaire ............................................................... 39 ix INTRODUCTION Historically, fishers (Martes pennanti) occurred throughout Wisconsin, wherever mature stands of timber existed (Jackson 1960). Fisher sightings were documented as far south as Milwaukee, Jefferson, Sauk, Vernon and La Crosse counties prior to 1870 (Jackson 1960 ). Before European settlement, fishers occupied from what is now northern British Columbia into central California in the Pacific coastal mountains south into Idaho, Montana and Wyoming in the Rocky Mountains. In central and eastern United States, they occupied all states from Minnesota east to the Atlantic Coast, and as far south as Illinois, Tennessee and North Carolina. During the last part of the 19th century and the early part of the 20th century, fisher numbers decreased strikingly, and they were extirpated from much of their former range in the United States (Brander and Books 1973; Coulter 1966; de Vos 1951). There were two reasons for the decline in fisher populations: trapping and habitat loss as a result of intensive logging. Both are capable of reducing fisher populations, and information available about the decline does not indicate if one might have been more important than the other. Trapping and logging are not independent of each other because logging increases the access trappers have to forested regions (Powell 1993). Regulated (controlled) logging on a sustained basis causes little threat to fisher populations. It was the effect of massive changes in northern forests that impacted fisher populations (Olson, personal communication, 1997). By the beginning of the 20th century, the fisher in Wisconsin was near extinction (Hine 1975). Fishers were finally given legal protection in 1921, but failed to respond, and the last known native was found in 1932 (Hine 1975). I The U.S. Forest Service and the Wisconsin Conservation Department, now the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR), cooperated to reestablish a fisher population during 1956-57 (Petersen et al. 1977). The main objectives were to reduce the extensive damage to timber by porcupines and to return a native species to Wisconsin (Olson 1966). Cook and Hamilton (1957) suggested using fishers as
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Linguistic Study: “Soda” and “Pop” in Wisconsin and Minnesota
    A Linguistic Study: “Soda” and “Pop” in Wisconsin and Minnesota A Linguistic Study: “Soda” and “Pop” in Wisconsin and Minnesota Heidi Sleep and Katie Thiel Undergraduate Students, Technical Communication Keywords: Linguistics, Pop, Soda, Isogloss, Coke Abstract The following linguistic research study was performed to discover language patterns in association with the terms “pop” and “soda.” Research was conducted through guided conversation with the subjects. Findings revealed that much of the research conducted in the past coincides with the findings we have tabulated with this project. Research confirmed that the information in the 2002 isogloss developed by Campbell and Plumb was accurate. There has not been a significant shift in the isogloss since 2002, and findings suggest that there may be relevant data for future studies regarding the use of brand specific names being used in place of the terms “pop” and “soda.” Introduction The purpose of this study was to determine the use of the terms “pop” and “soda” and develop an isogloss1 based on where the interviewed subjects were originally from. Previous linguistic studies have shown that the use of the terms “pop” and “soda,” in reference to soft drinks, varies tremendously in the upper Midwest, especially as one travels from southeastern Wisconsin to the northwest and into Minnesota. According to the map in Appendix A, the term “pop” is used more frequently in Minnesota, but in Wisconsin, the usage of the term seems to be more prevalent in the western side of the state, whereas the usage of the term “soda” remains dominant in the eastern side of Wisconsin.
    [Show full text]
  • Epidemiology of Canine Blastomycosis in Wisconsin
    EPIDEMIOLOGY OF CANINE BLASTOMYCOSIS IN WISCONSIN by John R. Archer A Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF SCIENCE College of Natural Resources . UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN Stevens Point, Wisconsin 1985 APPROVED BY THE GRADUATE COMMITTEE OF: Dr. Daniel 0. Trainer, Committee Chairman Dean, College of Natural Resources Dr. Aga Razv i Professor of Soils Dr. Robert Simpson Professor of Biology i ABSTRACT An epidemiologic study was designed to investigate the increasing number of canine blastomycosis cases being reported in Wisconsin. From January 1980 through July 1982, 200 cases of canine blastomycosis from 39 Wisconsin counties were examined to assess epidemiologic and environmental aspects of this disease. Based on a survey of 176 dog owners, principal disease characteristics for canine blastomycosis were anorexia, lethargy, shortness of breath, chronic cough, and weight loss. High incidence areas of canine blastomycosis occurred in the southeast, central, northwest, north central and northeast regions of Wisconsin. The central and northeast regions are new enzootic areas defined in this study. Sporting breeds accounted for the largest percentage of cases among the various breeds of dogs in Wisconsin. The majority of cases occurred among dogs three years of age and under. There did not appear to be a sexual predilection of dogs with blastomycosis in this study. Canine blastomycosis cases occurred from late spring through late fall. Enzootic areas, except for the southeast region of Wisconsin, occurred in sandy, acid soils. Results of this study suggest a possible association of enzootic areas with waterways, especially impoundments. Serum sampling resulted in the identification of a positive serologic reactor to blastomycosis in an adult timber wolf (Canis lupis).
    [Show full text]
  • Wineries Across Wisconsin: Autumn Is the Perfect Time to Tour These Scenic Vineyards and Cozy Tasting Rooms
    MILWAUKEE JOURNAL SENTINEL SUNDAY, AUGUST 23, 2015 Two Days To Explore www.wisconsintrails.com Tomahawk For more travel news p.2 CONTENT PROVIDED BY TRAVEL WISCONSIN OKTOBERFEST, WISCONSIN-STYLE, p.4 WINERIES ACROSS WISCONSIN: Autumn is the perfect time to tour these scenic vineyards and cozy tasting rooms. Clockwise from upper left: Wollersheim Winery Vineyard / Photo credit Wollersheim Winery; Captain’s Walk Winery / Photo credit Captain’s Walk Winery; Parallel 44 grape harvest / Photo credit Parallel 44 Winery; Door 44 Winery / Photo credit Door 44 Winery. By: Maureen Boylan ine lovers need not make the long trek to best wine, Philippe Coquard said, “We have three kids. That is like asking, ‘Which California to sip superb wines. Wisconsin of the three kids do you like best?’” But offers some of the best. In fact, the Wisconsin he does admit being partial to Domaine W du Sac, an estate-grown dry red, with a Winery Association divides the state into five wine regions medium-bodied palate and overtones of — Driftless, Door County, Fox Valley, Glacial Hills and raspberries and dark cherries, aged in oak. Northwoods — each with distinctive varieties and features. Don’t miss: Prairie Fumé, a multiple top award-winning wine. Grab a glass, With a backdrop of fall colors perfectly complementing then tour Wollersheim’s historic wine cave recently renovated as a museum wineries the ruby nouveaus, why not traverse the state and sample dedicated to the winery’s history. Founded in 2005, Parallel 44 began as a wines from each delicious region. winemaking and grape growing hobby for Door County Region Johnson and Milano.
    [Show full text]
  • Wisconsin Scenic Byways Program
    The Wisconsin Scenic Byways Program Citizen’s Handbook A guide for designating Wisconsin Scenic Byways Prepared by: Wisconsin Department of Transportation First Edition October 2005 Acknowledgements The Wisconsin State Scenic Byways Program and an earlier version of the Citizen’s Handbook were prepared by the Wisconsin Department of Transportation with assistance from Carter & Burgess, Inc. Jane V. Carrola, former Wisconsin Scenic Byways Coordinator and Lynne Marie Whately, Project Manager, Carter & Burgess are the primary authors of this Handbook. Significant assistance and input was provided by the Scenic Byways Advisory Group; also by Dennis Leong, Leif Hubbard, and Matt Rauch of the Wisconsin Department of Transportation; and by Frank Carlile and Joe Sumrall of Carter & Burgess. Funding for the creation of the Wisconsin State Scenic Byways Program and this Handbook was provided in part through a National Scenic Byways Program grant from the Federal Highways Administration. For questions, please contact Liat Bonneville 608-267-3614 or by e-mail: [email protected] Wisconsin State Scenic Byways Program 3 Table of Contents Introduction............................................................................... 7 Purpose of the Citizen’s Handbook................................................................. 7 Helpful Handbook Hints ..................................................................................8 The Designation Process..................................................................................8 The
    [Show full text]
  • Columbia, Dane, Dodge, Green, Jefferson, Rock, & Sauk
    Sustaining Wisconsin A Statewide Dialogue on Wisconsin’s Future A project of the Center on Wisconsin Strategy (COWS), UW-Madison Columbia, Dane, Dodge, Green, Jefferson, Rock, & Sauk Counties An Economic, Social, Environmental, and Political Snapshot Columbia Sauk Dodge May 2002 Regional Briefi ng Dane Jefferson Paper Series Green Rock Center on Wisconsin Strategy University of Wisconsin-Madison 1180 Observatory Drive, Room 7122 Madison, WI 53706-1393 TEL 608-262-5176 FAX 608-262-9046 EMAIL [email protected] WEB PAGES www.cows.org www.sustainingwisconsin.org Regional Briefi ng Paper Series, 1 Preface: Why we need State of the Region Reports In January 2001 the Center on Wisconsin Strategy (COWS) launched an 18-month statewide grassroots public education campaign — complete with coordinated media outreach, public discussion forums, an interactive web site, and regular electronic mailings — on major issues of concern to the state. “Sustaining Wisconsin” offers a model for mass education on public policy and involvement that will produce real results now and can be used elsewhere in the future. A central component of Sustaining Wisconsin is providing useful, accessible information to people in their communities. Integral to this mission is a series of regional reports we are releasing throughout the campaign. The regional reports are an attempt to understand and portray issues and matters that are of specifi c importance to residents in particular areas of Wisconsin. The regional reports focus more detailed attention on the many facts within Sustaining Wisconsin’s fi ve broad issue categories: Jobs and the Economy, Families and Communities, The Future, Environment and Natural Resources, and Democracy and Civic Participation.
    [Show full text]
  • Northwest Lowlands Ecological Landscape
    Chapter 16 Northwest Lowlands Ecological Landscape Where to Find the Publication The Ecological Landscapes of Wisconsin publication is available online, in CD format, and in limited quantities as a hard copy. Individual chapters are available for download in PDF format through the Wisconsin DNR website (http://dnr.wi.gov/, keyword “landscapes”). The introductory chapters (Part 1) and supporting materials (Part 3) should be downloaded along with individual ecological landscape chapters in Part 2 to aid in understanding and using the ecological landscape chapters. In addition to containing the full chapter of each ecological landscape, the website highlights key information such as the ecological landscape at a glance, Species of Greatest Conservation Need, natural community management opportunities, general management opportunities, and ecological landscape and Landtype Association maps (Appendix K of each ecological landscape chapter). These web pages are meant to be dynamic and were designed to work in close association with materials from the Wisconsin Wildlife Action Plan as well as with information on Wisconsin’s natural communities from the Wisconsin Natural Heritage Inventory Program. If you have a need for a CD or paper copy of this book, you may request one from Dreux Watermolen, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, P.O. Box 7921, Madison, WI 53707. Photos (L to R): Red-shouldered Hawk, photo © Laurie Smaglick Johnson; arctic fritillary, photo by Ann Thering; Sedge Wren, photo © Laurie Smaglick Johnson; gray wolf, photo by Gary Cramer, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Golden-winged Warbler, photo © Laurie Smaglick Johnson. Suggested Citation Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. 2015. The ecological landscapes of Wisconsin: An assessment of ecological resources and a guide to planning sustainable management.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Four
    CHAPTER FOUR Wisconsin Landscapes Changes in Natural Habitats Impacts and Vulnerabilities Non-Climate Stressors Adaptation Strategies 68 Photo: Darren Bush isconsin is rich in natural resources. Our cultural identity and economy are tied to the wealth Wof species – both plants and animals – that inhabit our state. With 16 million acres of forested land, more than 1,800 native plant species, more than 500 terrestrial animal species, more than 80,000 miles of streams and rivers, and more than 800 miles of Great Lakes coastline, biological diversity abounds in our state. These varied and diverse natural resources serve vital roles both in their ecosystems, by providing benefits such as soil formation and water purification, and in our society, by providing aesthetic, economic and recreational value and by contributing to our food supply. Climate change is impacting these ecosystems and their inhabitants by affecting individuals and com- munities of species and changing habitats and the processes that act within them. Rising temperatures, shifting precipitation patterns, and an increasing number of heavy rainfalls set off ripple effects that bring physical changes to natural habitats, triggering biological responses among the plant and animal species in them. Climate change is manifested differently across habitats, ecosystems and the state, with direct and indirect impacts resulting in “winner” and “loser” species, as some are particularly vulnerable to changes in climate and habitat while others are more resilient. While some species will indeed fare bet- ter in a warmer Wisconsin, scientists expect the majority of species influenced by climate change to fare worse. In this chapter, we provide general descriptions of the northern and southern regions of the state, each Ecosystem: Short for ecological system.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4: Economic Context of Freight on Wisconsin’S Transportation System
    4– Chapter 4: Economic Context of Freight on Wisconsin’s Transportation System Introduction Businesses throughout Wisconsin use the transportation system Overview of Chapter 4 to obtain the inputs needed to produce their goods and get • Describes the critical link between them to market. A safe and efficient transportation system Wisconsin’s transportation system and the supports the economy by providing access to inputs and markets state’s economy at a low cost, potentially reducing the overall cost of doing • Explores how freight movement in business and increasing competitiveness. Predictable and Wisconsin creates jobs and supports reliable travel times are important for manufacturing and other economic development • Reviews freight-dependent sectors in industries using just-in-time delivery. A safe, integrated, and Wisconsin seamless network of roadways, airports, harbors, pipelines, and • Identifies Wisconsin’s relationship to the railroads link Wisconsin businesses and consumers to the global Midwest, connections to the global economy. Without investment in the transportation system, the economy, and the required transportation link to the global economy could degrade, resulting in lost assets needed to support regional and productivity and competitiveness. global trade The connection between the transportation system and the economy makes transportation investment and policy choices not only about transportation, but also about facilitating economic development and growth. In order to provide a transportation system that meets the needs of the state economy, an understanding of the current and future needs of the state’s freight-dependent industries is critical. In addition, understanding the driving forces that could significantly affect those industries over the next 20 years allows decision makers to anticipate and invest in improvements that enable economic growth in Wisconsin.
    [Show full text]
  • Maine Future Forest Economy Project
    MAINE FUTURE FOREST ECONOMY PROJECT CURRENT CONDITIONS AND FACTORS INFLUENCING THE FUTURE OF MAINE’S FOREST PRODUCTS INDUSTRY MARCH 2005 PREPARED FOR: DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION – MAINE FOREST SERVICE AND MAINE TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE INNOVATIVE NATURAL RESOURCE SOLUTIONS LLC 107 ELM STREET, SUITE 100-E PORTLAND, ME 04101 WWW.INRSLLC.COM This material was prepared with financial support from the Department of Conservation – Maine Forest Service and the Maine Technology Institute. However, any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed are those of Innovative Natural Resource Solutions LLC unless otherwise noted, do not necessarily reflect the views of the Maine Department of Conservation, the Maine Forest Service, the Maine Technology Institute, or the project’s Advisory Committee, and do not constitute an endorsement of products or services mentioned. The analysis contained in this report is based upon our best professional judgment and on sources of information that we believe to be reliable. However, no representation or warranty is made by Innovative Natural Resource Solutions LLC or other authors of this report as to the accuracy or completeness of any of the information contained herein. Nothing in this report is, or should be relied upon as, a promise or representation as to the future. Cover photos by Maine Pulp & Paper Association, Small Woodland Owners Association of Maine and Innovative Natural Resource Solutions LLC (at Hillside Lumber). Used with permission. Printed Under Appropriation 013-04A-5180-512-4099 FFE3 Developed Under a Cooperative Forestry Assistance Grant CFDA 10.664 The USDA Forest Service prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status (not all prohibited bases apply to all programs).
    [Show full text]
  • Biotic Inventory and Analysis of the Kettle Moraine State Forest a Baseline Inventory and Analysis of Natural Communities, Rare Plants, and Animals
    Biotic Inventory and Analysis of the Kettle Moraine State Forest A Baseline Inventory and Analysis of Natural Communities, Rare Plants, and Animals June 2010 Natural Heritage Inventory Program Bureau of Endangered Resources Department of Natural Resources P.O. Box 7921 PUBL ER-821 2010 Kettle Moraine State Forest - 1 - Cover Photos (Clockwise from top left): Oak Woodland at Kettle Moraine Oak Opening SNA. Photo by Drew Feldkirchner, WDNR; prairie milkweed (Asclepias sullivantii). Photo by Ryan O’Connor, WDNR; Ephemeral Pond on the KMSF. Photo by Ryan O’Connor, WDNR; Northern Ribbon Snake (Thamnophis sauritus). Ohio DNR. Copies of this report can be obtained by writing to the Bureau of Endangered Resources at the address on the front cover. This publication is available in alternative format (large print, Braille, audio tape, etc) upon request. Please call (608-266-7012) for more information. The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources provides equal opportunity in its employment, programs, services, and functions under an Affirmative Action Plan. If you have any questions, please write to Equal Opportunity Office, Department of Interior, Washington, D.C. 20240. Kettle Moraine State Forest - 2 - Biotic Inventory and Analysis of the Kettle Moraine State Forest A Baseline Inventory and Analysis of Natural Communities, Rare Plants, and Animals Primary Authors: Terrell Hyde, Christina Isenring, Ryan O’Connor, Amy Staffen, Richard Staffen Natural Heritage Inventory Program Bureau of Endangered Resources Department of Natural Resources P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Intercity Passenger Rail
    Chapter 6: Intercity Passenger Rail Table of Contents Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 3 Overview of Existing Intercity Passenger Rail in Wisconsin ...................................................................... 4 History of intercity passenger rail in Wisconsin .................................................................................... 4 Amtrak Hiawatha Service: Chicago-Milwaukee .................................................................................... 6 Amtrak Thruway bus routes.................................................................................................................. 9 Wisconsin passenger rail stations ....................................................................................................... 10 Roles in Planning and Implementation of Intercity Passenger Rail Service ............................................ 12 Federal role ......................................................................................................................................... 12 Regional role ....................................................................................................................................... 15 Wisconsin’s role in planning and implementing intercity passenger rail ........................................... 17 Issues Impacting Intercity Passenger Rail ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The 2005–2010 Wisconsin Statewide Comprehensive Outdoorscorp Recreation Plan
    OUTDOOR RECREATION IN WISCONSIN The 2005–2010 Wisconsin Statewide Comprehensive OutdoorSCORP Recreation Plan Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources I am pleased to present to you Wisconsin’s 2005-2010 Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP). This document will provide you with comprehensive, up-to-date information on the status of statewide and regional recreation, as well as information about recreation supply and demand, participation rates and trends, and a discussion of outdoor recreation goals and actions for their implementation. Parks and recreation areas provide people with the opportunity to be physically active and make communities livable and desirable for businesses and homeowners. But as our population grows, public and private recreation providers face challenges in providing the quality outdoor recreation experiences that people in Wisconsin and visitors seek. This plan will assist recreation managers and decision makers with meeting these challenges. In Wisconsin, we can take pride in our strong and longtime tradition of public investment in preserving Wisconsin’s special landscapes and providing quality outdoor recreation opportunities. Wisconsin’s parks, recreation areas, open space, and natural areas play an important role in the health and well being of people in Wisconsin and our visitors. This plan will help us to continue our efforts to balance quality outdoor recreation experiences with the protection of our much loved natural and cultural resources. In closing, protecting Wisconsin’s great natural areas is a top priority for me—not only for our recreational enjoyment and the benefit of our tourism industry, but for the enjoyment of generations to come. Thank you to the numerous recreation providers, the general public, and recreation interest groups that participated in the creation of this plan for helping make Wisconsin a great place to live, work, and enjoy.
    [Show full text]