POLITICAL COMMUNICATION: Dumbing Down and Infotainment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

POLITICAL COMMUNICATION: Dumbing Down and Infotainment Department of Political Science Major in Politics, Philosophy and Economics Chair of Political Sociology POLITICAL COMMUNICATION: Dumbing Down and Infotainment Thesis Supervisor Candidate Prof. Michele Sorice Vittoria Pioli Student ID: 079052 Academic Year 2017/2018 1 Table of Contents Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………3 Chapter One: Political communication………………………………………………………….7 1.1 Public Sphere………………………………………………………………………………9 1.2 Media Influence……………………………………………………………………………10 1.3 The Information Age………………………………………………………………………13 Chapter Two: What is Dumbing Down?………………………………………………………...16 2.1 Political Participation……………………………………………………………………...17 2.2 Quality vs. Quantity………………………………………………………………………..18 2.3 Dumbing-down: reinventing the political process………………………………………....20 Chapter Three: What is Infotainment?..……………………………………………………..…..23 3.1 Measuring infotainment……………………………………………………………………24 3.2 Plebiscitary shows as democratic entertainment……………………………………….…..25 3.3 Performance, interactivity and engagement………………………………………………..27 Chapter Four: Applicability and Relevance today……………………………………………....30 4.1 Politics and Popular Culture………………………………………………………………..30 4.2 Celebrity Politicians and Political Communication………………………………………..32 4.3 Readdressing the electoral volatility…………………………………………………….....33 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………………………….36 Bibliography………………………………………………………………………………………..39 Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………………….46 2 “The two words information and communication are often used interchangeably, but they signify quite different things. Information is giving out; communication is getting through.” - Sydney J. Harris1 Introduction If we come to endorse the Aristotelian concept of the Zoon politikon (IV sec. B.C.), that is to say, literally, that man is a “civic” animal, a citizen-animal, we would convey that men (i.e. mankind) cannot live by themselves and it will prove them necessary to interact and, therefore, communicate. The famous expression is sometimes mistakenly translated as a political animal, but the adjective politikon is derived from the ancient Greek word polis, which actually means city. However, more generally, man is considered a social animal in Aristotelian terms. In fact, all individuals need to live together in groups, communicate and accept that they (we) are part of the same – shared – world. Thus, we posit communication at the very basis of men’s lives and of their survival on earth. Communication is the first tool we have at our disposal to connect with each other, exchanging basic codes of conduct, values, symbols, preferences, opinions, beliefs and so on and so forth. When joining together, people build communities of mutual respect in the interaction of its members. The community will not reduce the essence of all individuals to some homogeneous quality common to all, but the group will highlight every personal characteristic by confronting each of them with the others, establishing relations of natural sociability within its members and efficiently developing everyone’s skills and attitudes in order to bring novelty, growth and added value to those given groups and communities. Once established, larger communities will necessarily need some rules to function properly and the most efficient dialogue in order to set out, develop and pursue a “good life” takes place in politics. Here, the purpose of communication, a purpose assigned to men by nature according to Aristotle, would be to reveal what is advantageous and what is harmful, and consequently to expose what is just and what is unjust. Furthermore, the “good politics” would prefer and follow certain paths and codes of behaviour instead of others in order to achieve the highest level of growth, health, and well-being of given communities. For instance, following David Easton’s outlook set out in 1953, Politics decides what is right and what is wrong through the correct interchange of the inputs from the environment and the outputs into the environment. In fact, a political system receives the 1 Harris, S. (1975). The best of Sydney J. Harris. Boston: Houghton Mifflin., p. 293 3 demands and the support from outside and then produces and communicates decisions and policies, which, in turn, will additionally accumulate new feedbacks for the well-functioning of the system as a whole. Thus, the coming together of those two spheres of human nature, sociability, and politics (the private and the public life of each person), would generate a political civil society producing multiple interpretations and representations of a shared reality. In more recent times, this happens also through the work of the media system. In this reality, people – namely, the citizens – have a certain “power to communicate”, an expression endorsed in our modern concept of the freedom of expression. The communicative power, in fact, gives the individual the opportunity to develop his own opinions, values, and attitudes. Moreover, it sets the way through which those opinions can be expressed, and it provides the place where the citizens can confront their ideas. Today, this place is the media sphere, and by the use of the latter citizens can reach larger and larger audiences and further influence other people’s opinions, beliefs and behaviours (Sinha, 1997). Nonetheless, and quite sadly, communication is not always transparent nor linear. In fact, globally, individuals face persistent forms of censorship and they receive distorted and misleading information along with stereotyped images of gender and race. Moreover, some of them have restricted access to knowledge and insufficient channels to communicate their ideas and opinions. That is why, remarkably, in this scenario, it has been drafted in 1996 The People’s Communication Charter (PCC), one of the most noteworthy, recent and legal examples of the people’s struggle for the right to communicate. The People's Communication Charter is an opening step in the development of a permanent movement concerned with the quality of our communication environment. The initiators of the PCC believe it is time for individual citizens and their organisations to take an active role in the shaping of the cultural environment and to focus on the resulting production and distribution of information and culture. However, even though the Charter has been codified at the international level, it still holds only basic consideration worldwide: for instance, shockingly many people do not even know it exists. Along with the creation of some pluralist and sustainable cultural environment, the aim of the Charter is to promote communication in general, since, as its Preamble mentions, being communication basic to the life of all individuals and communities, people are entitled to participate in it, and to make decisions about it within and between societies.2 In this scenario, the Charter points out to the importance of the freedom of expression, specifically free of any interference from public or private interests. It is fundamental 2 The People's Communication Charter: An International Covenant of Standards and Rights. Reproduced in Culturelink 19, pp 171-75 4 for citizens to develop their own communication skills, channels, and institutions through which they can speak for themselves and tell their own stories.3 Furthermore, The People's Communication Charter provides the common framework for all those individuals who share the belief that people should be active and critical participants in their social reality and should be able to communicate their ideas and opinions. But the Charter is not an end in itself. It mainly provides the basis for an enduring critical reflection on those world-wide trends, tendencies, and inclinations that determine the quality of our lives in the third millennium. Finally, it is true that public systems and national organizations do not always help people in getting proper information, but it should be recalled that, nowadays, public space is increasingly dominated by a varied assortment of uninformed individuals, many of whom are self-deprecating, contemptuous of formal education that tend to minimize the value of experience. It seems that now we are living in an era where disinformation overcomes knowledge. And this is not a good sign at all. A modern society cannot function without a social division of labour and without relying on experts, professionals, and intellectuals. Naturally, nobody is expert about everything. Regardless of our aspirations, we are bound by the undeniable limits of our talent. As a community, we prosper because we specialize and because we develop formal and informal mechanisms that allow us to trust each other for their respective specializations. The great technological development of our era has given us access to an unprecedented amount of information. The result, however, was not the beginning of a new Enlightenment, but the rise of an age of incompetence in which a sort of uninformed egalitarianism seems to prevail over traditional consolidated knowledge. This thesis explores the political dimension of communication – namely, political communication – through its academic and popular background. Our starting point shall be the presentation and the discussion of the notion of the public sphere as presented by Jürgen Habermas in 1962. Furthermore, we shall observe the structural, ideological and conceptual influence of the media apparatus, particularly during an era known as the Information Age, over this concept. Afterwards, we shall observe and learn
Recommended publications
  • Sasha Polakow-Suransky with Cyrus Habib
    Sasha Polakow-Suransky with Cyrus Habib [00:00:05] Welcome to The Seattle Public Library’s podcasts of author readings and library events. Library podcasts are brought to you by The Seattle Public Library and Foundation. To learn more about our programs and podcasts, visit our web site at w w w dot SPL dot org. To learn how you can help the library foundation support The Seattle Public Library go to foundation dot SPL dot org [00:00:37] Hi everybody. Good evening. Thanks so much for being here tonight. I'm Stesha Brandon. I'm the Literature and Humanities Program Manager here at The Seattle Public Library. And welcome to this evening's program with Sasha Polakow-Suransky. I wanted to make a quick programming note unfortunately. Lieutenant Governor Habib was called away on urgent business and won't be able to join us tonight. That said we have a representative from his office who will be saying a few words a little bit later in the program. I wanted to thank our author series sponsor Gary Kunis and the Seattle Times for generous promotional support of library programs. Thank you as well to our program partner Elliott Bay Book Company for being here tonight. Finally we are grateful to The Seattle Public Library Foundation private gifts to the foundation from thousands of donors helped the library provide free programs and services that touched the lives of everyone in our community. So to library foundation donors here with us tonight. We say thank you very much for your support.
    [Show full text]
  • Psychological Issues in Escape, Rescue, and Survival in the Wake of Disaster
    2008 Psychological Issues in Escape, Rescue, and Survival in the Wake of Disaster Report Submitted to the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Pittsburgh Research Laboratory George S. Everly, Jr., PhD, ABPP Paul Perrin & George S. Everly, III Contents INTRODUCTION THE PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPACT OF CRISIS AND DISASTERS The Nature of Human Stress Physiology of Stress Psychology of Stress Excessive Stress Distress Depression Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Compassion Fatigue A Review of Empirical Investigations on the Mental Health Consequences of Crisis and Disaster Primary Victims/ Survivors Rescue and Recovery Personnel “RESISTANCE, RESILIENCE, AND RECOVERY” AS A STRATEGIC AND INTEGRATIVE INTERVENTION PARADIGM Historical Foundations Resistance, Resiliency, Recovery: A Continuum of Care Building Resistance Self‐efficacy Hardiness Enhancing Resilience Fostering Recovery LEADERSHIP AND THE INCIDENT MANAGEMENT AND INCIDENT COMMAND SYSTEMS (ICS) Leadership: What is it? Leadership Resides in Those Who Follow Incident Management Essential Information NIMS Components 1 Psychological Issues in Escape, Rescue, and Survival in the Wake of Disaster | George Everly, Jr. The Need for Incident Management Key Features of the ICS Placement of Psychological Crisis Intervention Teams in ICS Functional Areas in the Incident Command System Structuring the Mental Health Response Challenges of Rural and Isolated Response Caution: Fatigue in Incident Response Summary CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS REFERENCES APPENDIX A – Training resources in disaster mental health and crisis intervention APPENDIX B – Psychological First Aid (PFA) 2 Psychological Issues in Escape, Rescue, and Survival in the Wake of Disaster | George Everly, Jr. Introduction The experience of disaster appears to have become an expected aspect of life. Whether it is a natural disaster such as a hurricane or tsunami, or a human‐made disaster such as terrorism, the effects can be both physically and psychological devastating.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dark Side of Social Media Alarm Bells, Analysis and the Way Out
    The Dark Side of Social Media Alarm bells, analysis and the way out Sander Duivestein & Jaap Bloem Vision | Inspiration | Navigation | Trends [email protected] II Contents 1 The Dark Side of Social Media: r.lassche01 > flickr.com Image: a reality becoming more topical by the day 1 Contents PART I ALARM BELLS 7 2 2012, a bumper year for social media 7 3 Two kinds of Social Media Deficits 9 4 Addiction in the Attention Deficit Economy 10 PART II ANALYSIS 12 5 Ten jet-black consequences for Homo Digitalis Mobilis 12 6 Social media a danger to cyber security 20 7 The macro-economic Social Media Deficit 21 8 How did it get this far? 22 PART III THE WAY OUT 25 9 Dumbing-down anxiety 25 10 Basic prescription: social is the new capital 27 11 The Age of Context is coming 28 12 SlowTech should really be the norm 30 13 The Slow Web movement 31 14 Responsible for our own behavior 33 References 35 Justification iv Thanks iv This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial Share Alike 3.0 Unported (cc by-nc-sa 3.0) license. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-sa/3.0/legalcode or send a letter to Creative Commons, 543 Howard Street, 5th floor, San Francisco, California, 94105, usa. The authors, editors and publisher have taken care in the preparation of this book, but make no expressed or implied warranty of any kind and assume no responsibility for errors or omissions.
    [Show full text]
  • Audience Perspectives on Misinformation, Disinformation and Trust
    Audience Perspectives on Misinformation, Disinformation and Trust Nic Newman, Senior Research Associate at the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism Across countries trust in the news is declining. It has fallen 10 percentage points in the last five years in many of the largest countries we look at. In our 2019 Digital News Report survey, only around one in four (42%) say they trust ‘most news most of the time’, while less than half of us (49%) say we trust the news that we use ourselves. Trust in the news we find through digital intermediaries like search and social is even lower (23%). Meanwhile, over half of us (55%) worry that we can’t tell difference between what is real and fake on the internet when it comes to news and information. This is even higher in countries with polarised political debates like France, Brazil, the UK and US. The biggest jump in concern (+12pp) came in the UK (70%) where the news media have taken a lead in breaking stories about misinformation on Facebook and YouTube and there has been a high-profile House of Commons inquiry into the issue. Reasons for low trust and confidence in the news Our research suggests that there is no single reason for these changes. It is fashionable to blame social and digital media for fragmenting narratives and taking information out of context. It has certainly made it harder to tell reputable sources from less reputable ones as online platforms allowed anyone to publish unchecked information. But at the same time social media has also enabled new perspectives to be expressed (Arab spring, Iranian protests) and has helped establish a number of new and original news companies (Buzzfeed News, Huffington Post, Vox media and more).
    [Show full text]
  • Advertising, Women, and Censorship
    Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality Volume 11 Issue 1 Article 5 June 1993 Advertising, Women, and Censorship Karen S. Beck Follow this and additional works at: https://lawandinequality.org/ Recommended Citation Karen S. Beck, Advertising, Women, and Censorship, 11(1) LAW & INEQ. 209 (1993). Available at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/lawineq/vol11/iss1/5 Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality is published by the University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing. Advertising, Women, and Censorship Karen S. Beck* I. Introduction Recently, a friend told me about a television commercial that so angers her that she must leave the room whenever it airs. The commercial is for young men's clothing and features female mod- els wearing the clothes - several sizes too large - and laughing as the clothes fall off, leaving the women clad in their underwear. A male voice-over assures male viewers (and buyers) that the cloth- ing company is giving them what they want. While waiting in line, I overhear one woman tell another that she is offended by the fact that women often appear unclothed in movies and advertisements, while men rarely do. During a discussion about this paper, a close friend reports that she was surprised and saddened to visit her childhood home and find some New Year's resolutions she had made during her grade school years. As the years went by, the first item on each list never varied: "Lose 10 pounds . Lose weight . Lose 5 pounds ...... These stories and countless others form pieces of a larger mo- saic - one that shows how women are harmed and degraded by advertising images and other media messages.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Journalism: Making News, Breaking News
    MAPPING DIGITAL MEDIA: GLOBAL FINDINGS DIGITAL JOURNALISM: MAKING NEWS, BREAKING NEWS Mapping Digital Media is a project of the Open Society Program on Independent Journalism and the Open Society Information Program Th e project assesses the global opportunities and risks that are created for media by the switch- over from analog broadcasting to digital broadcasting; the growth of new media platforms as sources of news; and the convergence of traditional broadcasting with telecommunications. Th ese changes redefi ne the ways that media can operate sustainably while staying true to values of pluralism and diversity, transparency and accountability, editorial independence, freedom of expression and information, public service, and high professional standards. Th e project, which examines the changes in-depth, builds bridges between researchers and policymakers, activists, academics and standard-setters. It also builds policy capacity in countries where this is less developed, encouraging stakeholders to participate in and infl uence change. At the same time, this research creates a knowledge base, laying foundations for advocacy work, building capacity and enhancing debate. Covering 56 countries, the project examines how these changes aff ect the core democratic service that any media system should provide—news about political, economic and social aff airs. Th e MDM Country Reports are produced by local researchers and partner organizations in each country. Cumulatively, these reports provide a unique resource on the democratic role of digital media. In addition to the country reports, research papers on a range of topics related to digital media have been published as the MDM Reference Series. Th ese publications are all available at http://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/projects/mapping-digital-media.
    [Show full text]
  • Dumbing Down? Trends in the Complexity of Political Communication∗
    Dumbing Down? Trends in the Complexity of Political Communication∗ Kenneth Benoit† Kevin Munger‡ Arthur Spirling.§ March 18, 2017 Abstract Commentators and some political scholars claim to have observed a “dumbing down” of the level of sophistication of political language, leading to anxiety over the quality of democratic deliberation, knowledge, and policy design and implementation. This work typically focuses on the President’s State of the Union addresses. Using quantitative indicators of textual com- plexity, we measure trends since 1790 in that and other key political corpora, including rulings of the Supreme Court, the Congressional Record, and Presidential executive orders. To draw comparative lessons,we also study political texts from the United Kingdom, in the form of party broadcasts and manifestos. Not only do we cast shade on the supposed relentless simpli- fication of the State of the Union corpus, we show that this trend is not evident in other forms of elite political communication, including presidential ones. Finally, we argue that a stylistic— rather than an obviously substantive—shift towards shorter sentences is driving much of the over-time variation we see in traditional measures of political sophistication. ∗Prepared as a chapter for a book arising from the SSRC-funded “Anxieties of Democracy” workshop, held at Princeton University, 28-29 October 2016. We are grateful to Burt Monroe and other colleagues present for their very helpful comments. †Professor of Quantitative Social Research Methods, London School of Economics. [email protected]. ‡PhD Candidate, Department of Politics, New York University. [email protected]. §Associate Professor of Politics and Data Science, New York University.
    [Show full text]
  • ANTI PATTERNS Creating and Perpetuating Social Dominance
    ANTI PATTERNS creating and perpetuating social dominance Social Imagination and Civic Intelligence The Evergreen State College, Spring 2013 Preamble to Anti Pattern Project The purpose of this exploratory project is to collaboratively explore how inequality, injustice, oppression, and other unhealthy social forces are created and maintained in society. We are cautiously optimistic that this type of analysis could ultimately prove useful in working against those inhuman social forces. This is a wiki-based project and we do not consider it a finished piece. It's definitely a work in progress. This is the product of the Social Imagination and Civic Intelligence program, spring 2013 at The Evergreen State College. This reflects the content of the Wiki (http://wikis.evergreen.edu/civicintelligence/index.php/ Anti_Patterns_on_one_page) as of July 4, 2013. Introduction to the Patterns Fundamental Evils. The first category contains the three patterns that we believe are fundamental to unwholesome behaviors. Cultural Ignorance. The second category contains patterns that we believe describe culturally produced ignorance. Societal Philosophy. The third category contains the patterns that we believe represent societal philosophy. Institutionalization of Negative Philosophy. The fourth category contains the patterns that we believe institutionalize negative philosophies. Tactics. The fifth category contains the patterns that we believe describe tactics that can used by power elites (and others) to maintain negative social interactions. Media. The sixth category contains the patterns that we believe characterize the negative roles that the media can play. Results. The seventh category contains the patterns that we believe represent the results or byproducts of civic ignorance. Note that each of these is also a pattern in that these tend to act as ongoing social determinants.
    [Show full text]
  • Satirical Comedy Corrects Climate Change Disinformation
    Michigan Technological University Digital Commons @ Michigan Tech Dissertations, Master's Theses and Master's Reports 2020 “YOU DON’T NEED PEOPLE’S OPINIONS ON A FACT!”: SATIRICAL COMEDY CORRECTS CLIMATE CHANGE DISINFORMATION Shelly A. Galliah Michigan Technological University, [email protected] Copyright 2020 Shelly A. Galliah Recommended Citation Galliah, Shelly A., "“YOU DON’T NEED PEOPLE’S OPINIONS ON A FACT!”: SATIRICAL COMEDY CORRECTS CLIMATE CHANGE DISINFORMATION", Open Access Dissertation, Michigan Technological University, 2020. https://doi.org/10.37099/mtu.dc.etdr/1022 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/etdr Part of the American Popular Culture Commons, Digital Humanities Commons, Other Arts and Humanities Commons, Other Film and Media Studies Commons, and the Television Commons “YOU DON’T NEED PEOPLE’S OPINIONS ON A FACT!”: SATIRICAL COMEDY CORRECTS CLIMATE CHANGE DISINFORMATION By Shelly A. Galliah A DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In Rhetoric, Theory and Culture MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY 2020 © 2020 Shelly A. Galliah This dissertation has been approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Rhetoric, Theory and Culture. Department of Humanities Dissertation Advisor: Dr. Sue Collins Committee Member: Dr. Andrew Fiss Committee Member: Dr. Patricia Sotirin Committee Member: Dr. Joseph Reagle Department Chair: Dr. Patricia Sotirin Table of Contents Acknowledgements ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Trump, Propaganda, and the Politics of Ressentiment
    1! Trump, Propaganda, and the Politics of Ressentiment Before Trump had won his first primary in 2016, his opponents had noticed his ability to utterly sop up the media coverage 140 characters at a time. Many predicted that the media would lose interest in him and he would fall into the background. Timothy Carney voiced this sentiment in the early days of the campaign in his Washington Examiner editorial Trump Won’t Blow Up But He Will Fade Away.1 Carney and many other pundits quickly realized how wrong they were: Trump managed to keep himself in the news throughout the election, earning 76.9% of all Re- publican candidate mentions in the primary season, followed distantly by Jeb Bush at 5.3%.2 Even after the election, at 100 days into his presidency, he had received three times more cover- age than previous presidents.3 Whatever one thinks of how he stays in the limelight, Trump exer- cises a tremendous ability to keep himself there. Trump’s ability to capture media attention has been honed over decades of business deal- ings. In fact, few popularly know that only a minority of the Trump-branded properties and products today are his own: mostly, he licenses his name and agrees to do a set amount of pro- 1 Timothy P. Carney, “Trump Won’t Blow Up But He Will Fade Away,” The Washington Examiner, published December 10, 2015, accessed August 13, 2017, http://www.washingtonexaminer.- com/trump-wont-blow-up-but-he-will-fade-away/article/2578128. 2 GDELT Project, “2016 Campaign Television Tracker,” Analysis by the GDELT Project using data from the Internet Archive Television News Archive, accessed August 13, 2017, http://televi- sion.gdeltproject.org/cgi-bin/iatv_campaign2016/iatv_campaign2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Reality by Design: Advertising Image, Music and Sound Design in the Production of Culture
    Reality by Design: Advertising Image, Music and Sound Design in the Production of Culture by Joyce Kurpiers Department of Music Duke University Date:_____________________ Approved: ___________________________ Louise Meintjes, Supervisor __________________________ Scott Lindroth __________________________ Negar Mottahedeh __________________________ Orin Starn Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Music in the Graduate School of Duke University 2009 ABSTRACT Reality by Design: Advertising Image, Music and Sound Design in the Production of Culture by Joyce Kurpiers Department of Music Duke University Date:_____________________ Approved: ___________________________ Louise Meintjes, Supervisor __________________________ Scott Lindroth __________________________ Negar Mottahedeh __________________________ Orin Starn An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Music in the Graduate School of Duke University 2009 Copyright by Joyce Kurpiers 2009 Abstract This dissertation explores creative music, sound design and image production in the context of consumer culture (as defined by how its participants socialize in late- capitalist culture using commodities). Through the stylization of image, music and sound effects, advertisers communicate an abstract concept of a brand, and instantiate the brand through an audience member’s heightened experience of the brand via the ad. Facilitated by socialized and mediatized frameworks for brand communications, branding is an embodied practice that relies on the audience member’s participation with the brand through her/his real experience with an (audiovisual) advertisement. The effect of making the abstract brand tangible relies on successfully executing advertising objectives to create “impact” through stylized and often hyperreal representations of reality.
    [Show full text]
  • S K a T Ology
    SKATOLOGY Newsletter of the ASA Section on Science, Knowledge & Technology Table of Contents 1. Letter from Chair 3. New Articles 4. New Books Member Appointments From the Section Chair: 5. Calls for Papers “A Profound Anti-Intellectualism” 6. Job Announcements ne need only observe the Republican primary to 11. Section Info Onotice that science is not important to those debat- ing each other. The candidates have, for example, framed evolution as just a theory with some holes in it, climate change as a bogus claim designed to garner research dollars, and data on birth control and reductions in abor- tion as manipulated feminist politics. While technology appears favorably in one candidate’s quest to colonize the moon, collectively the primary debates have not offered a set of campaign strategies geared toward enhancing our understanding of the world. Don’t get me wrong: as a critical STS person, I certainly don’t believe that science is the only way to comprehend the world. Epistemological fundamentalism is as prob- lematic as any other kind of fundamentalism. But science (or rather, Science) is a significant form of knowledge and currently is the most influential with respect to education, policy, and culture in the Global North and much of the Global South. To ignore it, as the Republican candidates (and some Democrats) seem to be doing, is both danger- ous and stupid. As much as we in the STS community seek to engage in and with science, often critically, we also SKATOLOGY recognize that scientific knowledge is a key mechanism through which we (all of us) create social reality and truths about our bodies, lives, and environments.
    [Show full text]