Gracious Predestination in Augustine and Julian of Norwich Carmel Bendon Davis & Joseph Lam Cong Quy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Gracious Predestination in Augustine and Julian of Norwich Carmel Bendon Davis & Joseph Lam Cong Quy Louvain Studies 34 (2009-2010) 312-335 doi: 10.2143/LS.34.4.2122221 © 2010 by Louvain Studies, all rights reserved “The Parable of the Lord and Servant” The Salvific Memory: Gracious Predestination in Augustine and Julian of Norwich Carmel Bendon Davis & Joseph Lam Cong Quy Abstract. — In the Christian tradition medieval female mystics were often treated with suspicion. This does not seem to have been the case with Julian of Norwich who, in contrast to some of her female contemporaries, endeavoured to interpret her visions in the light of ecclesial faith, a process in which Augustinian theology can be demonstrated to have played an important role. This article focuses on the relationship between medi- eval Augustinian theology and the visions of Julian of Norwich. Moreover, it describes the impact of Augustinian theology on Julian of Norwich’s work “Revelations of Divine Love,” in particular on the theological connection between memory and predestination. For Augustine and Julian the memory of God is the precondition for understanding predestination. Nevertheless, Julian of Norwich was a mystical theologian in her own right. While for Augustine predestination included the idea of justification which pre- sumes a lapsarian sinfulness in humanity, Julian of Norwich wrestled with the contra- diction between the goodness of God’s creation and the very idea of sinfulness itself. For Julian, God’s memory is essentially filled with love and her explication of this view allows her to present a more accessible and simpler version of some complex theological questions. In this way, it is argued that Julian can be seen to have used Augustine’s ideas but not to have been confined, nor defined, by them. Introduction This article is synthesised from a larger project on the influence of Augustinian Theology on the mysticism of the High Middle Ages as represented, particularly, by the English mystic, Julian of Norwich. The scope of Augustinian influence can be widely demonstrated in Julian’s Revelations but the immediate focus here is on similarities in Augustine’s and Julian’s expressions in relation to memory and predestination. The article establishes that Julian’s approach owes much to Augustine, whether by conscious intention or unconscious inclusion. In either 994609_LouvStud_09-4_02_Davis.indd4609_LouvStud_09-4_02_Davis.indd 331212 11/07/11/07/11 110:230:23 PREDESTINATION IN AUGUSTINE AND JULIAN OF NORWICH 313 instance, the discernible similarities point to a high level of Augustinian influence in Julian’s writing, the extent of which has not been considered to date.1 The implications of this influence are far-reaching insofar as Julian, as a female and mystic, complements (male) Augustinian theol- ogy and brings a new voice to the tradition, a voice that the potential to revise aspects of the tradition and to point towards an inclusiveness that the Church of the current day is seeking. I. The Life of Augustine and Julian of Norwich One thousand years of history separate St. Augustine of Hippo (354-430) and Julian of Norwich (1342- after 1416). Augustine lived and worked mostly in the Romanized North Africa of the fourth and the fifth century. He was a highly respected theologian, a recognized pastor and mystic of the early Church2 whose thoughts and spirituality have inspired theologians through the centuries, into the time of Julian of Norwich and beyond, to the present day.3 While the life, theology and spirituality of Augustine have been the subjects of countless studies,4 scholarly interest in Julian of Norwich has gained prominence relatively recently and investigation into Julian’s life is in comparative infancy. What we know of Julian of Norwich comes to us primarily from her writings.5 There, she tells that on 8th May, 1373, when she was 1. To the authors’ knowledge, there are only three publications to date which spe- cifically explore Augustine’s influence on Julian of Norwich. See Kerrie Hide, “The Deep Wisdom of the Trinity Our Mother: Echoes in Augustine and Julian of Norwich,” The Aus- tralasian Catholic Record 4 (1997) 432-444; John P. H. Clark, “Nature, Grace and the Trinity in Julian of Norwich,” The Downside Review 100 (1982) 203-220. See also Denise Nowakowski Baker, Julian of Norwich Showings: From Vision to Book (Princeton, NJ: Uni- versity Press, 1994) which includes a short chapter on Augustine and Julian of Norwich. 2. See Agostino Trapè, S. Agostino: L’uomo, il pastore, il mistico, Maestri di spiri- tualità: Mondo primitivo (Fossano: Città Nuova, 1976); John Peter Kenney, The Mysti- cism of Saint Augustine: Rereading the Confessions (New York: Routledge, 2005). 3. See Alister E. McGrath, Iustitia Dei: A History of the Christian Doctrine of Justification. The Beginnings to the Reformation (Cambridge: University Press, 1989) 17: “The theology of the medieval period may be regarded as thoroughly Augustinian, a series of footnotes to Augustine, in that theological speculation was essentially regarded as an attempt to defend, expand and where necessary modify, the Augustinian legacy.” 4. Hubertus R. Drobner, “Studying Augustine: An Overview of Recent Research,” Augustine and His Critics, ed. Robert Dodaro and George Lawless (London: Routledge, 2000) 19. 5. Accounts of Julian’s revelations are extant in two forms, now referred to as the “Short Text” and the “Long Text.” The unique copy of the Short Text, likely to have been made after 1435 from a 1413 exemplar, is preserved in BL MS Additional 37790. Selections from the Long Text, dated around1500, are found in Westminster Treasury 994609_LouvStud_09-4_02_Davis.indd4609_LouvStud_09-4_02_Davis.indd 331313 11/07/11/07/11 110:230:23 314 CARMEL BENDON DAVIS & JOSEPH LAM CONG QUY 30-and-a-half-years old, she received what she herself refers to as sixteen revelations of God’s love. The definite date, and her age at that date, allow the calculation of her birth year as late or 1342 or early 1343. We know that she was still alive in 1416 when local records show that she received small bequests in two local wills. At some stage in her life she became an anchoress enclosed in the Augustinian church of St Julian’s in Conisford, Norwich. Based on this fact it is unlikely that ‘Julian’ was her birth name and it is generally supposed that she assumed the name of Julian in honour of the church that housed her.6 Julian’s revelations, variously also called “showings” and “visions,” are extant in two versions. The immediate details and impact of the revelations were recorded by Julian in her (so-named) “Short Text” (ST) quite soon after the actual experience but, by her own admission, the greatly expanded “Long Text” (LT) with its complex theological explications, is the final product of up to twenty years contemplation on the initial showings. Based on this scant evidence it would seem unlikely that Augustine and Julian could have much in common. It would seem even less likely that Julian’s humble living situation would have allowed her much acquaintance with the great theological and philosophical works of St Augustine; and, yet, evidence can be adduced to the contrary, both by an examination of the likelihood of Julian’s contact with Augustinian advisors in Norwich and by close attention to substantial theological similarities to Augustinian thought in Julian’s texts. It is the authors’ contention that the clear reiteration of Augustinian theology in Julian’s work cannot be attributed to mere accident or coin- cidence. The pervasiveness of Augustinian thought in Julian’s writings attests to a thorough knowledge instilled either by personal study and reflection on Augustine’s works, or by intensive instruction by spiritual advisors with an Augustinian training; or, perhaps even more likely, a combination of both. This latter possibility is reliably surmised on the basis of several studies which show that in the fourteen century the Augustinians played an essential role in religious life of this culturally and commercially “substantial” city.7 Specifically, just across the lane MS 4 but all complete versions of the Long Text are over a century later. Principal among the Long Text representatives are the Bibliothèque National Fonds anglais MS 40 and the BL MS Sloane 2499. The first modernized version of the Long Text was pub- lished in 1670 by the Benedictine Serenus Cressy. 6. For a new perspective on Julian’s name see Eddie A. Jones, “A Mystic By Any Other Name: Julian(?) of Norwich,” Mystics Quarterly 33 (2007) no. 3, 1- 16. 7. See, in particular, Elizabeth Rutledge, “Norwich before the Black Death,” Medi- eval Norwich, ed. Carol Rawcliffe and Richard Wilson (London: Continuum, 2004) 157. 994609_LouvStud_09-4_02_Davis.indd4609_LouvStud_09-4_02_Davis.indd 331414 11/07/11/07/11 110:230:23 PREDESTINATION IN AUGUSTINE AND JULIAN OF NORWICH 315 from Julian’s anchorhold, was the Austin friars’ “handsome house … [with] a fine library.”8 As an international Augustinian house of special studies (studium particulare)9 the library of Norwich presumably owned the entire collection of Augustine’s work10 and, as a religious woman and neighbour, it is very possible that Julian would have had access to the theological collection.11 In addition, during the 14th century, the Conisford friary saw a succession of highly influential priors.12 The exceptional preacher and excellent theologian, Benedict Icenus, was a prior there and from 1330 also acted as auxiliary bishop of Norwich.13 His successor in the priorship, Richard Cheffler, is recognized as an author of ‘elegant’ sermons, and as the spiritual advisor of Lord Morley. In 1390 the great Augustinian theologian Roger Twyford,14 became prior and this puts him in an 8. Edmund Colledge and James Walsh, “Introduction” to Julian of Norwich: A Book of Showings. Part One and Part Two (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 1978) 39.
Recommended publications
  • God and Moral Humans in Leviathan, Book
    God and the moral beings –A contextual study of Thomas Hobbes’s third book in Leviathan Samuel Andersson Extended Essay C, Spring Term 2007 Department of History of Science and Ideas Uppsala University Abstract Samuel Andersson, God and the moral beings –A contextual study of Thomas Hobbes’s third book in Leviathan. Uppsala University: Department of History of Science and Ideas, Extended Essay C, Spring Term, 2007. The question this essay sets out to answer is what role God plays in Thomas Hobbes’s Leviathan, in the book “Of a Christian Common-wealth”, in relationship to humans as moral beings. The question is relevant as the religious aspects of Hobbes’s thinking cannot be ignored, although Hobbes most likely had rather secular and sceptical philosophical views. In order to answer the research question Leviathan’s “Of a Christian Common-wealth” will be compared and contrasted with two contextual works: the canonical theological document of the Anglican Church, the Thirty-Nine Articles (1571), and Presbyterian-Anglican document the Westminster Confession (1648). Also, recent scholarly works on Hobbes and more general reference works will be employed and discussed. Hobbes’s views provide a seemingly unsolvable paradox. On the one hand, God is either portrayed, or becomes by consequence of his sceptical and secular state thinking, a distant God in relationship to moral humans in “Of a Christian Common-wealth”. Also, the freedom humans seem to have in making their own moral decisions, whether based on natural and divine, or positive laws, appears to obscure God’s almightiness. On the other hand, when placing Hobbes in context, Hobbes appears to have espoused Calvinist views, with beliefs in predestination and that God is the cause of everything.
    [Show full text]
  • Apologetics Study Guide Week 5 Week 5: WHAT to DO with HELL?
    Apologetics Study Guide Week 5 Week 5: WHAT TO DO WITH HELL? Opening Question: What have you heard about hell from sermons, if anything? What are some depictions of hell that you are familiar with (e.g. art, pop culture, etc.?) What questions come up in your mind when you think about hell? We will engage the topic of hell by asking a few questions: 1. Is hell real? 2. Why is there a hell? Who goes there? 3. What is all this about predestination? Oftentimes, we think of hell like this: God gives humans time to choose God, but if they do not, then he casts them into hell; and even if those people beg for mercy, God says, “Nope! You had your chance!” Thankfully, that is not the biblical depiction of hell or of how God relates to people.1 Every human has a sinful, fallen nature. No one is free from sin, and we cannot freely turn back to God on our own. We are all deserving of death, of hell, eternal separation from God. If we were left to ourselves, we would never choose God—we would not know to choose God, because we are so mired in self and sin. It is only by the work of the Holy Spirit that we are drawn to God in Jesus Christ where we find salvation and restoration of our relationship to God. God makes the first move and chooses and saves people.2 God chooses people so that they may tell others about God and God’s grace.
    [Show full text]
  • Predestination – a Christian’S Hope Or God’S Unfairness?
    Melanesian Journal of Theology 11-1&2 (1995) PREDESTINATION – A CHRISTIAN’S HOPE OR GOD’S UNFAIRNESS? Gabriel Keni Introduction This is God’s eternal purpose of deliverance of those He has chosen through Jesus Christ. The doctrine of predestination is one that brings several questions to the minds of Christians. These questions sometimes affect our whole attitude to life and salvation, and towards our trust and joy in God. But the doctrine of predestination is simple to state. It is eternity. God has chosen some for salvation through Christ, but has left others to their own choice of rebellion against Him. On some, He has mercy, drawing them to Christ; others He has hardened, and blinded by Satan, whose plans they willingly fulfil. The basic concept of Christian faith is that God is gracious, as clearly revealed in the Old Testament (Ex 34:6-7). The love of God is the motive for salvation, since God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son (John 3:16). The Bible teaches clearly, and common sense confirms, that God is sovereign over all aspects of His creation and their characteristics. He is also sovereign over death, so that He can bring back from death to life. We are, by nature, children of wrath, under God’s eternal condemnation of death. The dead cannot save themselves, but a way is open through Jesus Christ, so we must be born by God’s power of His Spirit. The doctrine of predestination is simply the consequence of man’s nature (death in trespasses and sins), and of God’s nature (His goodness and mercy).
    [Show full text]
  • Songs by Title Karaoke Night with the Patman
    Songs By Title Karaoke Night with the Patman Title Versions Title Versions 10 Years 3 Libras Wasteland SC Perfect Circle SI 10,000 Maniacs 3 Of Hearts Because The Night SC Love Is Enough SC Candy Everybody Wants DK 30 Seconds To Mars More Than This SC Kill SC These Are The Days SC 311 Trouble Me SC All Mixed Up SC 100 Proof Aged In Soul Don't Tread On Me SC Somebody's Been Sleeping SC Down SC 10CC Love Song SC I'm Not In Love DK You Wouldn't Believe SC Things We Do For Love SC 38 Special 112 Back Where You Belong SI Come See Me SC Caught Up In You SC Dance With Me SC Hold On Loosely AH It's Over Now SC If I'd Been The One SC Only You SC Rockin' Onto The Night SC Peaches And Cream SC Second Chance SC U Already Know SC Teacher, Teacher SC 12 Gauge Wild Eyed Southern Boys SC Dunkie Butt SC 3LW 1910 Fruitgum Co. No More (Baby I'm A Do Right) SC 1, 2, 3 Redlight SC 3T Simon Says DK Anything SC 1975 Tease Me SC The Sound SI 4 Non Blondes 2 Live Crew What's Up DK Doo Wah Diddy SC 4 P.M. Me So Horny SC Lay Down Your Love SC We Want Some Pussy SC Sukiyaki DK 2 Pac 4 Runner California Love (Original Version) SC Ripples SC Changes SC That Was Him SC Thugz Mansion SC 42nd Street 20 Fingers 42nd Street Song SC Short Dick Man SC We're In The Money SC 3 Doors Down 5 Seconds Of Summer Away From The Sun SC Amnesia SI Be Like That SC She Looks So Perfect SI Behind Those Eyes SC 5 Stairsteps Duck & Run SC Ooh Child SC Here By Me CB 50 Cent Here Without You CB Disco Inferno SC Kryptonite SC If I Can't SC Let Me Go SC In Da Club HT Live For Today SC P.I.M.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Karaoke Songs by Title
    Songs by Title Title Artist Title Artist #9 Dream Lennon, John 1985 Bowling For Soup (Day Oh) The Banana Belefonte, Harry 1994 Aldean, Jason Boat Song 1999 Prince (I Would Do) Anything Meat Loaf 19th Nervous Rolling Stones, The For Love Breakdown (Kissed You) Gloriana 2 Become 1 Jewel Goodnight 2 Become 1 Spice Girls (Meet) The Flintstones B52's, The 2 Become 1 Spice Girls, The (Reach Up For The) Duran Duran 2 Faced Louise Sunrise 2 For The Show Trooper (Sitting On The) Dock Redding, Otis 2 Hearts Minogue, Kylie Of The Bay 2 In The Morning New Kids On The (There's Gotta Be) Orrico, Stacie Block More To Life 2 Step Dj Unk (Your Love Has Lifted Shelton, Ricky Van Me) Higher And 20 Good Reasons Thirsty Merc Higher 2001 Space Odyssey Presley, Elvis 03 Bonnie & Clyde Jay-Z & Beyonce 21 Questions 50 Cent & Nate Dogg 03 Bonnie And Clyde Jay-Z & Beyonce 24 Jem (M-F Mix) 24 7 Edmonds, Kevon 1 Thing Amerie 24 Hours At A Time Tucker, Marshall, 1, 2, 3, 4 (I Love You) Plain White T's Band 1,000 Faces Montana, Randy 24's Richgirl & Bun B 10,000 Promises Backstreet Boys 25 Miles Starr, Edwin 100 Years Five For Fighting 25 Or 6 To 4 Chicago 100% Pure Love Crystal Waters 26 Cents Wilkinsons, The 10th Ave Freeze Out Springsteen, Bruce 26 Miles Four Preps, The 123 Estefan, Gloria 3 Spears, Britney 1-2-3 Berry, Len 3 Dressed Up As A 9 Trooper 1-2-3 Estefan, Gloria 3 Libras Perfect Circle, A 1234 Feist 300 Am Matchbox 20 1251 Strokes, The 37 Stitches Drowning Pool 13 Is Uninvited Morissette, Alanis 4 Minutes Avant 15 Minutes Atkins, Rodney 4 Minutes Madonna & Justin 15 Minutes Of Shame Cook, Kristy Lee Timberlake 16 @ War Karina 4 Minutes Madonna & Justin Timberlake & 16th Avenue Dalton, Lacy J.
    [Show full text]
  • PREDESTINATION" (Romans 9:1-33) (Chuck Swindoll)
    "PREDESTINATION" (Romans 9:1-33) (Chuck Swindoll) Predestination. Just the word appears intimidating. It is perhaps one of the most difficult concepts in all of Christian doctrine because it appears on the surface to rob humans of their most precious treasure: their autonomy. Although the doctrine challenges our notions of self- determination, it is ultimately what separates Christians from humanists, who proclaim that the fate of the world is ours to decide. The past, they say, has been fired in the kiln of history and cannot be altered, but tomorrow is still soft and pliable clay, ready to be shaped by the hands of humanity. Individually and collectively, we—not an almighty figment of wishful thinking—will determine our own future. Put in today's terms, "It's all about us." Today, I stand in the company of great theologians, preachers, teachers, missionaries, and evangelists to proclaim exactly the opposite. I join the ranks of reformers like William Tyndale, John Wycliffe, John Calvin, Huldrych Zwingli, John Huss, John Knox, and Martin Luther. I sing with the poets Isaac Watts and John Newton and preach with George Whitefield, Jonathan Edwards, and Charles Spurgeon. I respond to the call of pioneer missionary William Carey, who stirred his slumbering Calvinist generation to follow the command of Christ and make disciples of all nations. I place my theology alongside those of John Owen, A. H. Strong, William Shedd, Charles Hodge, B. B. Warfield, Lewis Sperry Chafer, John F. Walvoord, Donald Grey Barnhouse, and Ray Stedman. And I am numbered alongside my contemporaries John Stott, R.
    [Show full text]
  • Calvinism Or Arminianism? They Have Both Led to Confusion, Division and False Teaching
    Is Calvinism or Arminianism Biblical? A Biblical Explanation of the Doctrine of Election. By Cooper P. Abrams, III (*All rights reserved) [Comments from some who read this article] [Frequently Asked Questions About Calvinism] Is Calvinism or Arminianism Biblical? One of the most perplexing problems for the teacher of God's Word is to explain the relationship between the doctrine of election and the doctrine of salvation by grace. These two doctrines are widely debated by conservative Christians who divide themselves into two opposing camps, the "Calvinists" and the "Arminians." To understand the problem let us look at the various positions held, the terms used, a brief history of the matter, and then present a biblical solution that correctly addresses the issue and avoids the unbiblical extremes of both the Calvinists and the Arminians. Introduction to Calvinism John Calvin, the Swiss reformer (1509-1564) a theologian, drafted the system of Soteriology (study of salvation) that bears his name. The term "Calvinism" refers to doctrines and practices that stemmed from the works of John Calvin. The tenants of modern Calvinism are based on the works of Calvin that have been expanded by his followers. These beliefs became the distinguishing characteristics of the Reformed churches and some Baptists. Simply stated, this view claims that God predestined or elected some to be saved and others to be lost. Those elected to salvation are decreed by God to receive salvation and cannot "resist God's grace." However, those that God elected to be lost are born condemned eternally to the Lake of Fie and He will not allow them be saved.
    [Show full text]
  • Kappale Artisti
    14.7.2020 Suomen suosituin karaokepalvelu ammattikäyttöön Kappale Artisti #1 Nelly #1 Crush Garbage #NAME Ednita Nazario #Selˆe The Chainsmokers #thatPOWER Will.i.am Feat Justin Bieber #thatPOWER Will.i.am Feat. Justin Bieber (Baby I've Got You) On My Mind Powderˆnger (Barry) Islands In The Stream Comic Relief (Call Me) Number One The Tremeloes (Can't Start) Giving You Up Kylie Minogue (Doo Wop) That Thing Lauren Hill (Every Time I Turn Around) Back In Love Again LTD (Everything I Do) I Do It For You Brandy (Everything I Do) I Do It For You Bryan Adams (Hey Won't You Play) Another Somebody Done Somebody Wrong Song B. J. Thomas (How Does It Feel To Be) On Top Of The W England United (I Am Not A) Robot Marina & The Diamonds (I Can't Get No) Satisfaction The Rolling Stones (I Could Only) Whisper Your Name Harry Connick, Jr (I Just) Died In Your Arms Cutting Crew (If Paradise Is) Half As Nice Amen Corner (If You're Not In It For Love) I'm Outta Here Shania Twain (I'll Never Be) Maria Magdalena Sandra (It Looks Like) I'll Never Fall In Love Again Tom Jones (I've Had) The Time Of My Life Bill Medley & Jennifer Warnes (I've Had) The Time Of My Life Bill Medley-Jennifer Warnes (I've Had) The Time Of My Life (Duet) Bill Medley & Jennifer Warnes (Just Like) Romeo And Juliet The Re˜ections (Just Like) Starting Over John Lennon (Marie's The Name) Of His Latest Flame Elvis Presley (Now & Then) There's A Fool Such As I Elvis Presley (Reach Up For The) Sunrise Duran Duran (Shake, Shake, Shake) Shake Your Booty KC And The Sunshine Band (Sittin' On) The Dock Of The Bay Otis Redding (Theme From) New York, New York Frank Sinatra (They Long To Be) Close To You Carpenters (We're Gonna) Rock Around The Clock Bill Haley & His Comets (Where Do I Begin) Love Story Andy Williams (You Drive Me) Crazy Britney Spears (You Gotta) Fight For Your Right (To Party!) The Beastie Boys 1+1 (One Plus One) Beyonce 1000 Coeurs Debout Star Academie 2009 1000 Miles H.E.A.T.
    [Show full text]
  • Predestination and Freedom in Milton's Paradise Lost
    SJT 59(1): 64–80 (2006) Printed in the United Kingdom C 2006 Scottish Journal of Theology Ltd doi:10.1017/S0036930605001614 Predestination and freedom in Milton’s Paradise Lost Benjamin Myers The University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD 4072, Australia [email protected] Abstract John Milton’s epic poem Paradise Lost (1667) offers a highly creative seventeenth- century reconstruction of the doctrine of predestination, a reconstruction which both anticipates modern theological developments and sheds important light on the history of predestinarian thought. Moving beyond the framework of post-Reformation controversies, the poem emphasises both the freedom and the universality of electing grace, and the eternally decisive role of human freedom in salvation. The poem erases the distinction between an eternal election of some human beings and an eternal rejection of others, portraying reprobation instead as the temporal self-condemnation of those who wilfully reject their own election and so exclude themselves from salvation. While election is grounded in the gracious will of God, reprobation is thus grounded in the fluid sphere of human decision. Highlighting this sphere of human decision, the poem depicts the freedom of human beings to actualise the future as itself the object of divine predestination. While presenting its own unique vision of predestination, Paradise Lost thus moves towards the influential and distinctively modern formulations of later thinkers like Schleiermacher and Barth. Modern attempts to reformulate the idea of divine
    [Show full text]
  • Karaoke Mietsystem Songlist
    Karaoke Mietsystem Songlist Ein Karaokesystem der Firma Showtronic Solutions AG in Zusammenarbeit mit Karafun. Karaoke-Katalog Update vom: 13/10/2020 Singen Sie online auf www.karafun.de Gesamter Katalog TOP 50 Shallow - A Star is Born Take Me Home, Country Roads - John Denver Skandal im Sperrbezirk - Spider Murphy Gang Griechischer Wein - Udo Jürgens Verdammt, Ich Lieb' Dich - Matthias Reim Dancing Queen - ABBA Dance Monkey - Tones and I Breaking Free - High School Musical In The Ghetto - Elvis Presley Angels - Robbie Williams Hulapalu - Andreas Gabalier Someone Like You - Adele 99 Luftballons - Nena Tage wie diese - Die Toten Hosen Ring of Fire - Johnny Cash Lemon Tree - Fool's Garden Ohne Dich (schlaf' ich heut' nacht nicht ein) - You Are the Reason - Calum Scott Perfect - Ed Sheeran Münchener Freiheit Stand by Me - Ben E. King Im Wagen Vor Mir - Henry Valentino And Uschi Let It Go - Idina Menzel Can You Feel The Love Tonight - The Lion King Atemlos durch die Nacht - Helene Fischer Roller - Apache 207 Someone You Loved - Lewis Capaldi I Want It That Way - Backstreet Boys Über Sieben Brücken Musst Du Gehn - Peter Maffay Summer Of '69 - Bryan Adams Cordula grün - Die Draufgänger Tequila - The Champs ...Baby One More Time - Britney Spears All of Me - John Legend Barbie Girl - Aqua Chasing Cars - Snow Patrol My Way - Frank Sinatra Hallelujah - Alexandra Burke Aber Bitte Mit Sahne - Udo Jürgens Bohemian Rhapsody - Queen Wannabe - Spice Girls Schrei nach Liebe - Die Ärzte Can't Help Falling In Love - Elvis Presley Country Roads - Hermes House Band Westerland - Die Ärzte Warum hast du nicht nein gesagt - Roland Kaiser Ich war noch niemals in New York - Ich War Noch Marmor, Stein Und Eisen Bricht - Drafi Deutscher Zombie - The Cranberries Niemals In New York Ich wollte nie erwachsen sein (Nessajas Lied) - Don't Stop Believing - Journey EXPLICIT Kann Texte enthalten, die nicht für Kinder und Jugendliche geeignet sind.
    [Show full text]
  • Martin Luther and John Calvin on Predestination
    Martin Luther and John Calvin on Predestination Richard A. Layton* The Christian doctrine of predestination attempts to explain how a person is redeemed from his sinfulness. According to this teaching, God chooses some people to be heirs to the promised Kingdom of Heaven and condemns others to an eternity in hell. God's power and grace assure the chosen, or elect, eternal salvation. Those lacking this saving grace, hereafter referred to as the reprobate, bear the responsibility for their fate, despite the fact that God predestined their damnation from the beginning of time. This doctrine asserts the majesty of God and vanquishes any trust in man's free will to work toward salvation. No work by any individual, not even the work of believing in Christ, can purchase salvation. Redemption is the gift of God to whom He chooses to give it. The focus of this paper is the gap separating Martin Luther and the Lutheran church concerning this controversial doctrine. Early Lutheran confessions condemned teachings by John Calvin on predestination, ignoring Luther's agreement with Calvin on this issue. Even today Lutherans oppose Calvinist denominations on the questions of reprobation and assurance, which together comprise the complete doctrine of predestination.I The immediate questions answered by an examination of the doctrine of election are of secondary importance in the entire scheme of a theology of salvation. A belief in predestination, however, has ex.tensive implications, and the doctrine therefore deserves the large amount of attention given it by theologians since the earliest days of Christianity.2 Such faith in God's *Richard A.
    [Show full text]
  • Predestination
    Predestination letting God be God Table of Contents Week 1 Introduction: All Christians Believe in Predestination Week 2 Letting God be God 1: The Supremacy of God over History Week 3 Letting God be God 2: The Supremacy of God in God’s Heart Week 4 Letting God be God 3: Our Part & God’s Part in Conversion Week 5 Letting God be God 4: Foreknowledge & Double Predestination Week 6 What to do with this Teaching 1: Trust God for Perseverance Week 7 What to do with this Teaching 2: Pray, Evangelize & Support Missions Week 8 What to do with this Teaching 3: Live by Grace, not Works Suggested Reading James Montgomery Boice, Amazing Grace, Tyndale, 1993. Michael Horton, Putting Amazing Back into Grace, Baker, 1994. John F. MacArthur Jr, Ashamed of the Gospel, chapter 8, Crossway Books, 1993. J.I. Packer, Evangelism & the Sovereignty of God, InterVarsity Press, 1961. _______, Hot Tub Religion, chapter 2, 1987. Edwin H. Palmer, The Five Points of Calvinism, Baker, 1972. John Piper, The Pleasures of God: Meditations on God’s Delight in Being God, Multnomah, 1991. W.J. Seaton, The Five Pints of Calvinism, Banner of Truth Trust, 1970. Duane Edward Spencer, TULIP: The Five Points of Calvinism in the Light of Scripture, Baker, 1979. R.C. Sproul, Chosen by God, Tyndale, 1986. _______, Grace Unknown: The Heart of Reformed Theology, Baker, 1997. _______, Willing to Believe: The Controversy over Free Will, Baker, 1997. David Steele & Curtis Thomas, The Five Points of Calvinism, P&R, 1963. R.K. McGregor Wright, No Place for Sovereignty, InterVarsity Press, 1996.
    [Show full text]