DOCSLIB.ORG

Political Rallies to Conventions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Political Rallies to Conventions Sergey Minasyan FROM POLITICAL RALLIES TO CONVENTIONS POLITICAL AND LEGAL ASPECTS OF PROTECTING THE RIGHTS OF THE ARMENIAN ETHNIC MINORITY IN GEORGIA AS EXEMPLIFIED BY THE SAMTSKHE-JAVAKHETI REGION Yerevan 2007 ê»ñ·»Û ØÇݳëÛ³Ý ø²Ô²ø²Î²Ü òàôÚòºðÆò ¸ºäÆ Ð²Ø²Ò²Úܲ¶ðºð ìð²êî²ÜÆ Ð²Ú ¾ÂÜÆÎ²Î²Ü öàøð²Ø²êÜàôÂÚ²Ü Æð²ìàôÜøܺðÆ ä²Þîä²ÜàôÂÚ²Ü ø²Ô²ø²Î²Ü ºì Æð²ì²Î²Ü ²êäºÎîܺðÀ ê²Øòʺ-æ²ì²ÊøÆ î²ð²Ì²Þðæ²ÜÆ úðÆܲÎàì ºñ¨³Ý 2007 Ðî¸ (341.231.14) ¶Øä (6791) Ø-710 Minasyan, S. From Political Rallies to Conventions: Political and Legal Aspects of Protecting the Rights of the Armenian Ethnic Minority in Georgia as Exemplified by the Samtskhe-Javakheti Region. – Yerevan, CMI and the ‘Yerkir’ NGO Union, 2007. – p. 92. The volume analyses the situation with human and minority rights in Georgia and suggests ways of integrating minorities in the social, political and cultural life of the country. The author looks at the legal framework for minority issues, focusing on Georgia’s international legal obligations and their political implementation practices. In a case study of the Armenian-populated region of Samtskhe-Javakheti, the author proposes mechanisms and recommendations for achieving a compromise between minorities’ needs to preserve their identity, language and culture, and to achieve factual political rights, on one hand, and their profound civil integration, on the other. Scientific Editor: A. Iskandaryan Editors: H. Kharatyan, N. Iskandaryan, R. Tatoyan Translation from Russian: V. Kisin English version editor: N. Iskandaryan Cover photo by R. Mangasaryan Cover design and layout by “Matit” Studio / www.matit.am Printed by “Samark” LLC Ø 710 ØÇݳëÛ³Ý ê. ø³Õ³ù³Ï³Ý óáõÛó»ñÇó ¹»åÇ Ñ³Ù³Ó³Ûݳ•ñ»ñ. ìñ³ëï³ÝÇ Ñ³Û ¿ÃÝÇÏ³Ï³Ý ÷áùñ³Ù³ëÝáõÃÛ³Ý Çñ³íáõÝùÝ»ñÇ å³ßïå³ÝáõÃÛ³Ý ù³Õ³ù³Ï³Ý »õ Çñ³í³Ï³Ý ³ëå»ÏïÝ»ñÁ ê³ÙóË»-æ³í³ËùÇ ï³ñ³Í³ßñç³ÝÇ ûñÇݳÏáí. - ºñ»õ³Ý, Èñ³ïí³ÙÇçáóÝ»ñÇ ÏáíϳëÛ³Ý ÇÝëïÇïáõï »õ гÛñ»Ý³¹³ñÓáõÃÛ³Ý »õ ÑÇÙݳíáñÙ³Ý §ºñÏÇñ¦ ѳë³ñ³Ï³Ï³Ý ϳ½Ù³Ï»ñåáõÃÛáõÝÝ»ñÇ ÙÇáõÃÛáõÝ, 2007. - ¾ç. 92. àõëáõÙݳëÇñáõÃÛáõÝÁ ÝíÇñí³Í ¿ ìñ³ëï³ÝáõÙ Ù³ñ¹áõ »õ ¿ÃÝÇÏ³Ï³Ý ÷áùñ³Ù³ëÝáõÃÛáõÝÝ»ñÇ Çñ³íáõÝùÝ»ñÇ å³ßïå³ÝáõÃÛ³Ý áÉáñïáõÙ ïÇñáÕ Çñ³íÇ׳ÏÇ í»ñÉáõÍáõÃÛ³ÝÁ, »ñÏñÇ ù³Õ³ù³Ï³Ý áõ Ùß³ÏáõóÛÇÝ ÏÛ³ÝùÇÝ ¿ÃÝÇÏ³Ï³Ý ÷áùñ³Ù³ëÝáõÃÛáõÝÝ»ñÇ Ñ³Ù³ñÏÙ³Ý Ñ»é³ÝϳñÝ»ñÇ áñáÝÙ³ÝÁ: лﳽáïíáõÙ »Ý ïíÛ³É ËݹÇñÁ ϳñ·³íáñáÕ ³éϳ, ³Û¹ ÃíáõÙ` ÙÇç³½·³ÛÇÝ-Çñ³í³Ï³Ý å³ñï³íáñáõÃÛáõÝÝ»ñÇó »õ ųٳݳϳÏÇó ìñ³ëï³ÝáõÙ ¹ñ³Ýó ·áñÍÝ³Ï³Ý ù³Õ³ù³Ï³Ý Çñ³Ï³Ý³óÙ³Ý åñ³ÏïÇϳÛÇó µËáÕ Çñ³í³Ï³Ý ßñç³Ý³ÏÝ»ñÁ: г۳µÝ³Ï ê³ÙóË»-æ³í³Ëù ï³ñ³Í³ßñç³ÝÇ ûñÇݳÏáí ٻ˳ÝǽÙÝ»ñ áõ ѳÝÓݳñ³ñ³Ï³ÝÝ»ñ Ù߳ϻÉáõ ÷áñÓ ¿ ³ñíáõÙ, ÙÇ ÏáÕÙÇó, ÷áùñ³Ù³ëÝáõÃÛáõÝÝ»ñÇ ÇÝùÝáõÃÛ³Ý, É»½íÇ áõ Ùß³ÏáõÛÃÇ å³Ñå³ÝáõÃÛ³Ý, Ýñ³Ýó ù³Õ³ù³Ï³Ý Çñ³Ï³Ý Çñ³íáõÝùÝ»ñ ïñ³Ù³¹ñ»Éáõ »õ, ÙÛáõë ÏáÕÙÇó, Ýñ³Ýó ѻﳷ³ ù³Õ³ù³óÇ³Ï³Ý Ñ³Ù³ñÏÙ³Ý ÙÇç»õ ÷á˽ÇçÙ³Ý Ñ³ëÝ»Éáõ ѳٳñ: ¶Çï³Ï³Ý ËÙµ³·Çñ` ². Æëϳݹ³ñÛ³Ý ÊÙµ³·ÇñÝ»ñ` Ð. ʳé³ïÛ³Ý, Ü. Æëϳݹ³ñÛ³Ý, è. ³ÃáÛ³Ý èáõë»ñ»ÝÇó óñ·Ù³Ý»ó` ì. ÎÇëÇÝ ²Ý·É»ñ»Ý óñ·Ù³ÝáõÃÛ³Ý ËÙµ³·Çñ` Ü. Æëϳݹ³ñÛ³Ý üáïá` è. سݕ³ë³ñÛ³Ý Þ³åÇÏÇ Ó»õ³íáñáõÙ »õ ٳϻï` §Ø³ïÇï¦ ëïáõ¹Çá / www.matit.am îå³·ñí»É ¿ §ê³Ù³ñϦ êäÀ ïå³ñ³ÝáõÙ ¶Øä 67.91+ 66.3 (2 ìñ) ISBN - 99941-2-058-1 © 2006 by Caucasus Media Institute and the ‘Yerkir’ NGO Union © Èñ³ïí³ÙÇçáóÝ»ñÇ ÏáíϳëÛ³Ý ÇÝëïÇïáõï »õ гÛñ»Ý³¹³ñÓáõÃÛ³Ý »õ ÑÇÙݳíáñÙ³Ý §ºñÏÇñ¦ ѳë³ñ³Ï³Ï³Ý ϳ½Ù³Ï»ñåáõÃÛáõÝÝ»ñÇ ÙÇáõÃÛáõÝ, 2006. ܳ˳•ÍÇ Ý³Ë³Ó»éÝáÕ »õ •É˳íáñ Ñáí³Ý³íáñ` гÛñ»Ý³¹³ñÓáõÃÛ³Ý »õ ÑÇÙݳíáñÙ³Ý §ºñÏÇñ¦ гë³ñ³Ï³Ï³Ý γ½Ù³Ï»ñåáõÃÛáõÝÝ»ñÇ ØÇáõÃÛáõÝ / www.yerkir.org TABLE OF CONTENTS 5 ............... EDITOR’S NOTE 7 ............... FOREWORD 10 ............. INTRODUCTION 15 ............. CHAPTER 1. GEORGIA IN THE LIGHT OF COMPLIANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL LEGAL NORMS AND MECHANISMS IN THE FIELD OF HUMAN RIGHTS, AND THE RIGHTS OF ETHNIC MINORITIES 15 ............. 1.1. International legal standards in the UN framework 16 ............. 1.2. International legal standards in the OSCE framework 18 ............. 1.3. International legal standards in the framework of the Council of Europe 23 ............. CHAPTER 2. NORMS OF THE GEORGIAN LAW WITH REGARD TO PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE RIGHTS OF ETHNIC MINORITIES, AND THEIR POLITICAL IMPLEMENTATION 23 ............. 2.1. General 27 ............. 2.2. Freedom of speech and of using the mother tongue 39 ............. 2.3. Freedom of education and culture 45 ............. 2.4. Freedom of religion 52 ............. 2.5. Political rights and development of local self-governance 61 ............. RECOMMENDATIONS 61 ............. Protection of fundamental human rights and freedoms 61 ............. Law and legal standards 62 ............. Socio-political area 62 ............. Activities of international organizations 63 ............. Activities of international donor organizations 63 ............. Linguistic issues 63 ............. Cultural and educational fields 64 ............. Freedom of conscience and freedom to practise religion 64 ............. Local governance area 65 ............. Civic integration and participation of minorities in social and political life 65 ............. Socio-economic sphere 66 ............. CONCLUSION 69 ............. BIBLIOGRAPHY 76 ............. APPENDICES 76 ............. Appendix 1: List of international legal UN documents signed by Georgia 77 ............. Appendix 2: List of legal documents in the framework of the Council of Europe to which Georgia is a party 78 ............. Appendix 3: Georgia’s Declarations to the Council of Europe Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities 80 ............. Appendix 4: International Crisis Group Recommendation to the Georgian Government 82 ............. CMI PUBLICATIONS EDITOR’S NOTE The book we offer to the reader here is an abridged edition of the full version that appeared in Russian and Armenian. The abridged version in English is identical to the one in Georgian. The reasons this book was published in a number of formats are purely technical; this is fortunately not an insurmountable obstacle for experts: those who are interested have an option of reading the full text in Russian or Armenian. In fact, the book is aimed not only, and perhaps not so much, at those who specialize in affairs of South Caucasus or post-Soviet space and can read in Russian or Armenian. It is devoted to problems that plague Javakheti, one of the regions of South Georgia. The majority of the population of this territory, one of the economically least developed in Georgia, are ethnic Armenians. Problems that are common for the entire Georgian state – lame and stuttering system of administration, corruption, separation from the system of decision making etc – get even more complicated in Javakheti because representatives of an ethnic minority form compact settlement in the region. Problems with linguistic and cultural policies, local self-governance, political and civil rights, resistance to facilitation of contacts with Armenia that has common borders with this region etc, generate resentment and discontent in the local population which looks through the “lens of ethnicity” on practically every problem in the region, and produce a feeling of discrimination. The Georgian authorities, in their turn, respond with extreme apprehension to the autonomy demands that reach them from Javakheti and from public figures in Armenia who are often emigrants from Javakheti. This tangle of contradictions creates an almost classic model situation of a latent ethnic conflict in the making for the post-Soviet space and breeds mistrust between the ethnic majority and ethnic minorities in Georgia. At the same time, it is our good fortune that these contradictions and differing approaches to assessing the future of the region do not lead to an open confrontation. The country that lived through two really bloody conflicts (one in Abkhazia and another in South Ossetia) and is still unable to pacify and control them, does try to build its statehood in accordance with the standards accepted in the international community such as signing the appropriate documents and attempting to implement them, albeit not always successfully. We thus face an exceedingly interesting situation in which the apparent conflict of interest not only refuses to flare up into a war (like the widely known Karabakh- or Abkhazia-type military collisions) but does not even bring about consequences that are typical of similar types of conflicts in the West, like the Corsican or Basque confrontations. Nevertheless, the discourse in the two communities remains as torn apart 8 / Editor’s Note and as politicized and ethnicized as before, and in this form is often found in Western publications. It is common to both discourses (the Armenian and the Georgian) dealing with this problem that alarmism became a cliché of articles on the region published outside its borders. Both “pro-Armenian” and “pro-Georgian” versions appear in the West in special papers and in newspaper articles devoted to Javakheti. The book offered here to the reader is an attempt to avoid this mistake. To what extent the author succeeded in this is for his readers to decide.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Freedom of Religion Or Belief in Georgia 2010-2019
    FREEDOM OF RELIGION OR BELIEF IN GEORGIA Report 2010-2019 FREEDOM OF RELIGION OR BELIEF IN GEORGIA REPORT 2010-2019 Tolerance and Diversity Institute (TDI) 2020 The report is prepared by Tolerance and Diversity Institute (TDI) within the framework of East-West Management Institute’s (EWMI) "Promoting Rule of Law in Georgia" (PROLoG) project, funded by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The report is published with the support from the Open Society Georgia Foundation (OSGF). The content is the sole responsibility of the Tolerance and Diversity Institute (TDI) and does not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), United States Government, East-West Management Institute (EWMI) or Open Society Georgia Foundation (OSGF). Authors: Mariam Gavtadze, Eka Chitanava, Anzor Khatiashvili, Mariam Jikia, Shota Tutberidze, Gvantsa Lomaia Project director: Mariam Gavtadze Translators: Natia Nadiradze, Tamar Kvaratskhelia Design: Tornike Lortkipanidze Cover: shutterstock It is prohibited to reprint, copy or distribute the material for commercial purposes without written consent of the Tolerance and Diversity Institute (TDI). Tolerance and Diversity Institute (TDI), 2020 Web: www.tdi.ge CONTENTS Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................. 8 Methodology ..........................................................................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Javakheti After the Rose Revolution: Progress and Regress in the Pursuit of National Unity in Georgia
    Javakheti after the Rose Revolution: Progress and Regress in the Pursuit of National Unity in Georgia Hedvig Lohm ECMI Working Paper #38 April 2007 EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR MINORITY ISSUES (ECMI) ECMI Headquarters: Schiffbruecke 12 (Kompagnietor) D-24939 Flensburg Germany +49-(0)461-14 14 9-0 fax +49-(0)461-14 14 9-19 Internet: http://www.ecmi.de ECMI Working Paper #38 European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) Director: Dr. Marc Weller Copyright 2007 European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) Published in April 2007 by the European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI) ISSN: 1435-9812 2 Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................4 II. JAVAKHETI IN SOCIO-ECONOMIC TERMS ...........................................................5 1. The Current Socio-Economic Situation .............................................................................6 2. Transformation of Agriculture ...........................................................................................8 3. Socio-Economic Dependency on Russia .......................................................................... 10 III. DIFFERENT ACTORS IN JAVAKHETI ................................................................... 12 1. Tbilisi influence on Javakheti .......................................................................................... 12 2. Role of Armenia and Russia ............................................................................................. 13 3. International
    [Show full text]
  • Armenian Monuments Awareness Project
    Armenian Monuments Awareness Project Armenian Monuments Awareness Project he Armenian Monuments Awareness Proj- ect fulfills a dream shared by a 12-person team that includes 10 local Armenians who make up our Non Governmental Organi- zation. Simply: We want to make the Ar- T menia we’ve come to love accessible to visitors and Armenian locals alike. Until AMAP began making installations of its infor- Monuments mation panels, there remained little on-site mate- rial at monuments. Limited information was typi- Awareness cally poorly displayed and most often inaccessible to visitors who spoke neither Russian nor Armenian. Bagratashen Project Over the past two years AMAP has been steadily Akhtala and aggressively upgrading the visitor experience Haghpat for local visitors as well as the growing thousands Sanahin Odzun of foreign tourists. Guests to Armenia’s popular his- Kobair toric and cultural destinations can now find large and artistically designed panels with significant information in five languages (Armenian, Russian, Gyumri Fioletovo Aghavnavank English, French, Italian). Information is also avail- Goshavank able in another six languages on laminated hand- Dilijan outs. Further, AMAP has put up color-coded direc- Sevanavank tional road signs directing drivers to the sites. Lchashen Norashen In 2009 we have produced more than 380 sources Noratuz of information, including panels, directional signs Amberd and placards at more than 40 locations nation- wide. Our Green Monuments campaign has plant- Lichk Gegard ed more than 400 trees and
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking Genocide: Violence and Victimhood in Eastern Anatolia, 1913-1915
    Rethinking Genocide: Violence and Victimhood in Eastern Anatolia, 1913-1915 by Yektan Turkyilmaz Department of Cultural Anthropology Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Orin Starn, Supervisor ___________________________ Baker, Lee ___________________________ Ewing, Katherine P. ___________________________ Horowitz, Donald L. ___________________________ Kurzman, Charles Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Cultural Anthropology in the Graduate School of Duke University 2011 i v ABSTRACT Rethinking Genocide: Violence and Victimhood in Eastern Anatolia, 1913-1915 by Yektan Turkyilmaz Department of Cultural Anthropology Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Orin Starn, Supervisor ___________________________ Baker, Lee ___________________________ Ewing, Katherine P. ___________________________ Horowitz, Donald L. ___________________________ Kurzman, Charles An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Cultural Anthropology in the Graduate School of Duke University 2011 Copyright by Yektan Turkyilmaz 2011 Abstract This dissertation examines the conflict in Eastern Anatolia in the early 20th century and the memory politics around it. It shows how discourses of victimhood have been engines of grievance that power the politics of fear, hatred and competing, exclusionary
    [Show full text]
  • Armenian Tourist Attraction
    Armenian Tourist Attractions: Rediscover Armenia Guide http://mapy.mk.cvut.cz/data/Armenie-Armenia/all/Rediscover%20Arme... rediscover armenia guide armenia > tourism > rediscover armenia guide about cilicia | feedback | chat | © REDISCOVERING ARMENIA An Archaeological/Touristic Gazetteer and Map Set for the Historical Monuments of Armenia Brady Kiesling July 1999 Yerevan This document is for the benefit of all persons interested in Armenia; no restriction is placed on duplication for personal or professional use. The author would appreciate acknowledgment of the source of any substantial quotations from this work. 1 von 71 13.01.2009 23:05 Armenian Tourist Attractions: Rediscover Armenia Guide http://mapy.mk.cvut.cz/data/Armenie-Armenia/all/Rediscover%20Arme... REDISCOVERING ARMENIA Author’s Preface Sources and Methods Armenian Terms Useful for Getting Lost With Note on Monasteries (Vank) Bibliography EXPLORING ARAGATSOTN MARZ South from Ashtarak (Maps A, D) The South Slopes of Aragats (Map A) Climbing Mt. Aragats (Map A) North and West Around Aragats (Maps A, B) West/South from Talin (Map B) North from Ashtarak (Map A) EXPLORING ARARAT MARZ West of Yerevan (Maps C, D) South from Yerevan (Map C) To Ancient Dvin (Map C) Khor Virap and Artaxiasata (Map C Vedi and Eastward (Map C, inset) East from Yeraskh (Map C inset) St. Karapet Monastery* (Map C inset) EXPLORING ARMAVIR MARZ Echmiatsin and Environs (Map D) The Northeast Corner (Map D) Metsamor and Environs (Map D) Sardarapat and Ancient Armavir (Map D) Southwestern Armavir (advance permission
    [Show full text]
  • Armenians in the Making of Modern Georgia
    Armenians in the Making of Modern Georgia Timothy K. Blauvelt & Christofer Berglund While sharing a common ethnic heritage and national legacy, and an ambiguous status in relation to the Georgian state and ethnic majority, the Armenians in Georgia comprise not one, but several distinct communities with divergent outlooks, concerns, and degrees of assimilation. There are the urbanised Armenians of the capital city, Tbilisi (earlier called Tiflis), as well as the more agricultural circle of Armenians residing in the Javakheti region in southwestern Georgia.1 Notwithstanding their differences, these communities have both helped shape modern Armenian political and cultural identity, and still represent an intrinsic part of the societal fabric in Georgia. The Beginnings The ancient kingdoms of Greater Armenia encompassed parts of modern Georgia, and left an imprint on the area as far back as history has been recorded. Moreover, after the collapse of the independent Armenian kingdoms and principalities in the 4th century AD, some of their subjects migrated north to the Georgian kingdoms seeking save haven. Armenians and Georgians in the Caucasus existed in a boundary space between the Roman-Byzantine and Iranian cultures and, while borrowing from both spheres, struggled to preserve their autonomy. The Georgian regal Bagratids shared common origins with the Armenian Bagratuni dynasty. And as part of his campaign to forge a unified Georgian kingdom in the late 11th and early 12th centuries, the Georgian King David the Builder encouraged Armenian merchants to settle in Georgian towns. They primarily settled in Tiflis, once it was conquered from the Arabs, and in the town of Gori, which had been established specifically for Armenian settlers (Lordkipanidze 1974: 37).
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the NIMD South Caucasus - Georgia Programme
    Evaluation of the NIMD South Caucasus - Georgia Programme, 2011–2014 17 September 2015 Lincoln Mitchell and Tinatin Ninua Final Report Contents Executive summary .......................................................................................................... 2 Acronyms ........................................................................................................................ 7 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 8 2. Background .................................................................................................................. 9 2.1 Country context............................................................................................................... 9 2.2 Political context ............................................................................................................... 9 2.3 International assistance context ................................................................................... 10 2.4 NIMD country programme overview ............................................................................ 10 3. NIMD country programme impacts ............................................................................. 13 3.1 Multiparty dialogue ....................................................................................................... 13 3.2 Legitimate political parties ............................................................................................ 14 3.3 Political-civil
    [Show full text]
  • Szanowna Pani Marszałek! W Odpowiedzi Na In- Terpelację Pana Posła Macieja Małeckiego, Pismo Załącznik
    221 utrzymania systemu (koszty licencji, serwisu sprzętu z dnia 11 kwietnia br., nr SPS-023-24906p/14, w spra- i oprogramowania, a także koszty obsługi technicz- wie prac zleconych i wspólnych projektów MSZ z ze- nej), co w perspektywie utrzymania systemu ze środ- wnętrznymi ośrodkami badawczymi i analitycznymi, ków budżetowych będzie wymierną korzyścią dla w załączeniu uprzejmie przekazuję wykaz wydatków Skarbu Państwa. poniesionych przez MSZ w ramach realizacji umów z podmiotami zewnętrznymi. Z poważaniem Załączona lista zawiera wykaz organizacji poza- rządowych, z którymi Ministerstwo Spraw Zagra- Podsekretarz stanu nicznych współpracowało w latach 2008–2014 wraz Rafał Magryś z przedmiotem i kosztem powierzonych im zleceń. Ponadto należy wymienić podmioty, które korzysta- ją z dotacji podmiotowej MSZ (Polski Instytut Spraw Warszawa, dnia 9 maja 2014 r. Międzynarodowych), a także instytucje korzystające z finansowania z innych źródeł, nad którymi mini- sterstwo sprawuje nadzór merytoryczny (Instytut Odpowiedź Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej w Lublinie oraz (do września 2013 r.) Instytut Zachodni w Poznaniu). podsekretarza stanu Ministerstwo współpracuje również z Ośrodkiem w Ministerstwie Spraw Zagranicznych Studiów Wschodnich. - z upoważnienia ministra - Odpowiedź, jakiej MSZ udzieliło pierwotnie, za- na ponowną interpelację wierała informację zbiorczą nt. zakresu współpracy posła Macieja Małeckiego MSZ z podmiotami zewnętrznymi w obszarze prac analitycznych i badawczych. Syntetyzowała ona in- w sprawie prac zleconych formacje zawarte w
    [Show full text]
  • Church – Consolidating the Georgian Regions
    Church – Consolidating the Georgian Regions Metropolitan Ananya Japaridze Saint Ilia the Righteous said from the very establishment of the holy Church of Georgia, that it presented a strong power consolidating the whole population of the state. It was not locked within the narrow ethnic borders but was the belonging of different ethnos residing in the state. According to Holy Writ, it never differentiated Hellenist from Jew, Georgian from non-Georgian, as its flocks were children of Georgia with mutual responsibility to the country and citizenship. Even Saint Nino, founder of the Georgian Church, came from Kapadokia. Saint of Georgian Church, martyr Razhden, and Saint Evstati Mtskheteli were Persian. Famous 12 fathers struggling against fire-worship and Monophysitism were Assyrian (Syrian). Neopyth Urbani Episcope was Arabian. The famous Saint Abo Tbileli came from Arabia too. The Saint Queen Shushanik was Armenian etc. The above list shows that Georgian church unified all citizens of the country in spite of their ethnic origin. At the same time, the Georgian church always used to create a united cultural space. The Georgian Church was consolidating regions and different ethnic groups of Georgia. The Georgian language was the key factor of Georgian Christian culture. Initially, Georgian language and based on it Georgian Christian culture embraced whole Georgia, all its regions. Divine services, all church acts, in mountains and lowlands from the Black Sea to Armenia and Albania were implemented only in Georgian language. Georgian language and Georgian culture dominated all over the Georgian territory. And just this differentiates old Georgia from the present one. It’s evident that the main flocks of Georgian Church were Georgians of West, South and East Georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. World Bank Assistance to Armenia, 1993-2002
    Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized 1 1 Acronyms AAA Analyhcal and Advisory Services AR Armenia Railways BTO Back to Office CAE Country Assistance Evaluation CAS Country Assistance Strategy CEM Country Economic Memorandum CIS Commonwealth of Independent States DAC Development Assistance Committee DFID Department for International Development (UK) EBRD European Bank for Reconstruction and Development ECA Europe and Central Asia ECSSD Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development EDP Enterprise Development Project ERP Earthquake Reconstruction Project ESW Economic Sector Work FSU Former Soviet Union FIAS Foreign Investment Advisory Service GDP Gross Domestic Product GOA Government of Armenia IBRD International Bank for Reconstruction and Development IDA International Development Agency IFAD International Fund for Agricultural Development IFC International Finance Corporation IFIS International Financial Institutions IMF International Monetary Fund JBIC Japan Bank for International Cooperation Kfw Kreditanstalt fiir Wiederaufbau (German Agency for Reconstruction) LIL Learning and Innovation Lending MDG Millennium Development Goal MTEF Medium Term Expenditure Framework NK Nagorno Karabakh ODA Official Development Assistance OECD Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development OED Operations Evaluation Development OOF Other Official Flows PER Public Expenditure Review PRSP Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper PSD Private Sector Development SAC ' Structural Adjustment Credit SATAC Structural Adjustment Technical Assistance SCADA Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition SIF Social Investment Fund SME Small and Medium Enterprises SOE State Owned Enterprise TA Technical Assistance USAID United States Agency for International Development WB World Bank WTO World Trade Organization ~~ Director-General, Operations Evaluation Mr. Gregory K. Ingram Director, Operations Evaluation Department Mr. Ajay Chhibber Senior Manager, Country Evaluation & Regional Relations Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • SEMPOZYUM UTAS.Cdr
    ULUSLARARASI UTAS ARI AŞTIRMAL T RKOLOJ AR SEMPOZYUMU INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON TURKOLOGY STUDIES 26-28 Eylül 2019 VAN - TÜRKİYE ÖZET KİTABI Edtör: Dr. Tolga ÖNTÜRK Abstract Booklet Dr. İrfan POLAT http://utas.yyu.edu.tr http://utas.yyu.edu.tr - [email protected] ULUSLARARASI TÜRKOLOJİ ARAŞTIRMALARI SEMPOZYUMU (UTAS, 26-28 Eylül 2019, VAN) e-baskı Eylül 2019 Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Yayın No: 69 e-ISBN: 978-975-7616-69-6 Editörler Dr. Tolga ÖNTÜRK Dr. İrfan POLAT Tasarım Öğr. Gör. Halit YABALAK Eylül 2019 / VAN İletişim [email protected] https://www.utas.yyu.edu.tr/ e-kitap Bu çalışma, Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, Araştırma Projeleri Koordinasyon Birimi tarafından kabul edilen STD-2019-7867 nolu proje kapsamında gerçekleştirilmiştir. Uluslararası Türkoloji Araştırmaları Sempozyumu (UTAS), 26-28 Eylül 2019, Van SEMPOZYUM KÜNYESİ (SYMPOSIUM INTRODUCTION) KURULLAR (COMMITTEES) SEMPOZYUM ONURSAL BAŞKANI (HONORARY CHAIR) Prof. Dr. Hamdullah ŞEVLİ (Rektör) ONUR KURULU (HONORARY COMITTEE) Prof. Dr. Gürer GÜLSEVİN Prof. Dr. Refik TURAN Prof. Dr. Ahmet Bican ERCİLASUN Prof. Dr. Bayram KODAMAN Prof. Dr. Emine GÜRSOY NASKALİ Prof. Dr. Enver KONUKÇU Prof. Dr. Hamza ZÜLFİKAR Prof. Dr. Hasanbala SADIKOV Prof. Dr. İsmail YAKIT Prof. Dr. Ramazan ÖZEY Prof. Dr. Saim SAKAOĞLU DÜZENLEME KURULU BAŞKANLARI (ORGANIZATION COMMITTEE CHAIRMANS) Doç. Dr. Murat ÖZTÜRK (Türk Dili ve Edebiyatı Eğitimi Öğr. Üyesi) Doç. Dr. Bekir KOÇLAR (Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Müdürü) 2 Uluslararası Türkoloji Araştırmaları Sempozyumu (UTAS), 26-28 Eylül 2019, Van SEMPOZYUM GENEL SEKRETERİ (GENERAL SECRETARY OF SYMPOSIUM) Öğr. Gör. Halit YABALAK DÜZENLEME KURULU (ORGANIZATION COMMITTEE) Prof. Dr. Hüseyin KARADAĞ Prof. Dr. S. Cem ŞAKTANLI Prof. Dr. Rafet ÇAVUŞOĞLU Doç.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Tonoyan.Indd
    Rising Armenian–Georgian Tensions and the Possibility of a New Ethnic Conflict in the South Caucasus Artyom Tonoyan Abstract: This article analyzes the recent geopolitical developments in Georgian and Armenian societies and the possibility of a new interstate conflict between the two nations. The article focuses on the role of internal and external political factors, such as the the integration of the Armenian minority in Georgia’s Javakheti region into the political processes and economic projects in that country; unresolved issues concerning the ownership of Armenian churches in Georgia; third-party geopolitical overtures in the region; and the role of new information technologies in social mobilization and political activism. The article finds that despite a centu- ries-old relationship between these two countries, the possibility of new con- flicts in the South Caucasus is, though small, not entirely out-of-the-question. Keywords: Armenia, Georgia, ethnic conflict, South Caucasus he South Caucasus region is in the news again, and not for good reasons. There have T been occasional bursts of headline-grabbing events in the Caucasus since the heyday of Gorbachev-era political reforms and following the collapse of the Soviet Union, many of them having to do with military confrontation between the region’s various ethnoreli- gious inhabitants. Considered the traditional domain of Russian economic, political and military influence, the South Caucasus has generally been absent from Western political and media analysis, but with the recent engagement of the United States and the Euro- Artyom Tonoyan is a doctoral candidate in Religion, Politics & Society in the J.M. Dawson Institute of Church-State Studies at Baylor University, where he also lectures on nationalism, ethnic conflict, and international human rights.
    [Show full text]