DOCSLIB.ORG

NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE Published by Authority

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE Published by Authority No.97 2631 THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE Published by Authority WELLINGTON: THURSDAY, 23 NOVEMBER 1972 Land Taken for Road and for the Use, Convenience, or A. R. P. Being Enjoyment of a Road in Blocks I, V, and VI, Maungaru 1 3 3 1 Survey District, and Block XIII, Mangakahia Survey o 0 20 r Parts Te Karaka Block; coloured yellow on plan District, Hobson County 1 1 15 J M.O.W. 26705 ,<S.O. 47149). 1 0 30.3 Part Lot 21, D.R.O. W. 55; coloured blue on plan M.O.W. 26705 (S.O. 47149). DENIS BLUNDELL, Governor-General Situated in Block I, Maungaru Survey District: A PROCLAMATION A. R. P. Being PURSUANT to the Public Works Act 1928, I, Sir Edward Denis o 0 237 rParts Section 34, Block I, Maungaru Survey Blundell, the Governor-General of New Zealand, hereby pro­ o 0 26'2 ~ District; coloured yellow on plan M.O.W. 26706 claim and declare that the land described in the Second . L (S.O. 47150). Schedule hereto is hereby taken for the use, convenience, or o 0 3.5 Part Section 1, Block I, Maungaru Survey District; enjoyment of a road and shall vest in the Chairman, Council­ coloured yellow on plan M.O.W. 26707 (S.O. lors, and Inhabitants of the County of Hobson as from the 47151). date hereinafter-mentioned, and that the land described in the o 1 12.6 Part Lots 1, 6, and 7, D.P. 32893; coloured First Schedule hereto is hereby taken for road; and I also blue on plan M.O.w. 26708 ,<S.O. 47152). declare that this Proclamation shall take effect on and after the o 0 28.5 Part Lot 4, D.P. 32893; coloured yellow on plan 27th day of November 1972. M.O.W. 26708 (S.O. 47152). o 7.7 Part Lot 2, D.P. 32893; coloured blue on plan M.O.W. 26708 (S.O. 47152). Situated in Block V, Maungaru Survey District: FIRST SCHEDULE A. R. P. Being NORnI AUCKLAND LAND DISfRICf o 0 21.3}305 Parts Lot 3, D.P. 32893; coloured yellow on plan ALL those pieces of land situated in the North Auckland o 0 8:6 M.O.W. 26703 (S.O. 46904). R.D., described as follows: o 1 14.5 ~ Parts Lot 4, D.P. 32893; coloured yellow on plan Situated in Block XIII, Mangakahia Survey District: o 0 17.1 J M.O.W. 26703 (S.O. 46904). A. R. P. Being Situated in Blocks V and VI, Maungaru Survey District: o 0 16.6 Part Section 8, Block XIII, Mangakahia Survey A. R. P. Being District; coloured sepia on plan M.O.W. 26704 o 0 11.9) Parts Lot 3, D.P. 32893; coloured yellow on plan (S.O. 47148). o 2 7.9 J M.O.W. 26703 (S.O. 46904). o 0 15;4 Part Section 15, Block XIII, Mangakahia Survey o I 0.9 Part Lot 4, D.P. 32893; coloured yellow on plan District; coloured yellow on plan M.O.W. 26704 M.O.W. 26703 (S.O. 46904). (S.O. 47148). Situated in Blocks I and V, Maungaru Survey District: o 0 4.4 Part Section 15, Block XIII, Mangakahia Survey A. R. P. Being District; coloured yellow on plan M.O.W. 26704 (S.O. 47148). o 0 36.6 Part Lot 4, D.P. 32893; coloured yellow on plan o 0 6.9 Part Te Karaka Block; coloured yellow on plan M.O.W. 26703 (S.O. 46904). M.O.W. 26704 (S.O. 47148), Situated in Block VI, Maungaru Survey District: A. R. P. Being g g : 3} Parts Lot 21, D.R.O. W. 55; coloured blue on 1 1 12' plan M.O.W. 26704 (S.O. 47148'). o 1 18.2 ~ Parts Lot 3, D.P. 32893; coloured yellow on plan o 0 20 J M.O.W. 26703 (S.O. 46904). o 0 271 Parts. S~ction 7, Block ;XIII, Mangakahia Survey o 0 8.9 Part Lot 4, D.P. 32893; coloured yellow on plan o 1 6 District; coloured sepia on plan M.O.W. 26705 M.O.W. 26703 (S.O. 46904). (S.O. 47149). o 024 1 Parts Section 11, Block XIII, Mangakahia Survey Situated in Block VI, Maungaru Survey District: o 0 28:6 g~gi~~I~oJ)~red sepia on plan M.O.W. 26705 A. R. P. Being o 0 7.5 ~ o 0 6 9 Parts Section 20, Block XIII, Mangakahia Survey o 0 7.3 Parts Lot 2, D.P. 24559; coloured yellow on plan o 1 5:9 ~ District; coloured yellow on plan M.O.W. 26705 o 0 10.7 M.O.W. 26702 (S.O. 46903). L (S.O. 47149). o 1 23.6 J 26312 THE NEW ZEALAND GAZEITE Nb.> 97 A. R. P. Being A. R. P. Being o 2 32.5 Part Lot 4, D.P. 32893; coloured yellow on plan 1 1 6.8 Part Section 8; coloured orange on plan M.O.W. M.O.W. 26702 (S.O. 46903). 26714 (S.O. 8270). o 0 22.9} Parts Lot 7, D.P. 24559; coloured yellow on plan o 3 28.1 Part Section 9; coloured blue on plan M.O.W. o 0 9.5 M.O.W. 26701 (S.O. 46902). 26714 (S.O. 8270). o 0 13.5 Part Lot 8, D.P. 24559; coloured sepia on plan Situated in Block VII, Town of Mataura. M.O.W. 26701 (S.O. 46902). o 0 7.1 Part Lot 2, D.P. 25325; coloured blue on plan As the same are more particularly delineated on the plans M.O.W. 26701 (S.O. 46902). marked and coloured as above-mentioned and deposited in the o 0 9.7} Parts Lot 1, D.P. 25325; coloured blue on plan office of the Minister of Works at Wellington. o 0 10.3 M.O.w. 26702 (S.O. 46903). Given under the hand of His Excellency the Governor­ o 0 12.1 Part Lot 3, D.P. 25325; coloured blue on plan General, and issued under the Seal of New Zealand, this M.O.w. 26702 (S.O. 46903). 13th day of November 1972. o 0 4.1 Part Lot 3, D.P. 24559; coloured yellow on plan [L.s.] PERCY B. ALLEN, Minister of Works. M.O.W. 26702 (S.O. 46903). 1 0 9.6 Part Lot 2, D.P. 24559; coloured yellow on plan Goo SAVE THE QUEEN! M.O.w. 26702 (S.O. 46903). (P.W. 96/775000/0; Dn. D.O. 96/775000) o 0 7 Part Lot 2, D.P. 50854; coloured yellow on plan M.O.W. 26701 (S.O. 46902). o 2 33.9 Part Lot 11, D.P. 24559; coloured sepia on plan Land Taken for Road in Block I. Takata Survey District, M.O.W. 26701 (S.O. 46902). Opotiki County o 1 21.7 fParts land on D.P. 25563; coloured blue on plan o 0 2.3 M.O.W. 26701 (S.O. 46902). DENIS BLUNDELL, Governor-General o 0 22.3 Parts Lot 9, D.P. 24559; coloured blue on plan A PROCLAMATION ' o 0 7.7 M.O.w. 26701 (S.O. 46902). PURSUANT to the Public Works Act 1928, I, Sir Edward Denis o 0 27.5 Parts Lot 10, D.P. 24559; coloured yellow on plan Blundell, the Governor-General of New Zealand, hereby pro­ o 0 17.6 f M.O.W. 26701 (S.O. 46902). claim and declare that the land described in the Schedule As the same are more particularly delineated on the plans hereto is hereby taken for road; and I also declare that this marked and coloured as above-mentioned and deposited in Proclamation shall take effect on and after the 27th day of the office of the Minister of Works at Wellington. November 1972. SCHEDULE SECOND SCHEDULE GISBORNE LAND DISTRICT NORTH AUCKLAND LAND DISTRICT ALL those pieces of land situated in Block I, Tokata Survey ALL that piece of land containing 16.2 perches situated in District, Opotiki County, Gisborne R.D., described as follows: Block VI, Maungaru Survey District, North Auckland R.D., A. R. P. Being and being part Lot 2, D.P. 24559; as the same is more particularly delineated on the plan marked M.O.W. 26702 o 0 4.4 Part Omaio 43 Block; coloured blue on plan. (S.O. 46903) deposited in the .office of the Minister of o 0 38.91 Works at Wellington, and thereon coloured yellow, edged o 2 17.61 yellow. o 0 11.3 1 0 7.9 Given under the hand of His Excellency the Governor· General, and issued under the Seal of New Zealand, g ~ M:~ 1Parts Omaio 7 Block; coloured orange on plan. this 14th day of November 1972. o 0 20.3 [L.s.] PERCY B. ALLEN, Minister of Works. o 1 24.1 o 0 8.1 GOD SA VB THE QUEEN! o 0 34 (P.W. 33/7,12/1; Ak. D.O. 50/15/2/0/46902) o 0 5.8 Part Omaio 5 Block; coloured sepia on plan. g ~ ~.2 } Parts Whitianga 8 Block; coloured orange on plan. As the same are more particularly delineated on the plan marked M.O.W. 25775 (S.O. 6017) deposited in the office of the Minister of Works at Wellington, and thereon coloured as Land Taken for River Control Purposes in Block XIII, above-mentioned.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • No 82, 21 December 1966, 2227
    No. 82 2227 THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE Published by Authority WELLINGTON: WEDNESDAY, 21 DECEMBER 1966 Crown Land Set Apart for the Purposes of the Maori Housing Given under the hand of His Excellency the Governor­ Act 1935 General, and issued under the Seal of New Zealand, this 15th day of December 1966. BERNARD FERGUSSON, Governor-General [Ls.] J. B. GORDON, Minister of Railways. A PROCLAMATION Goo SAVE THE QUEEN! PURSUANT to section 2 of the Maori Housing Amendment (N.Z.R. L.O. 23823 /25) Act 1938, I, Brigadier Sir Bernard Edward Fergusson, the Governor-General of New Zealand, hereby proclaim and declare that the Crown land, subject to the Land Act 1948, described in the Schedule hereto, is hereby set apart for the Declaring Land in the Hawke' s Bay Land District, Vested in purposes of the Maori Housing Act 1935. the Hawke's Bay Education Board as a Site for a Public School, to be Vested in Her Majesty the Queen SCHEDULE SOUTH AUCKLAND LAND DISTRICT BERNARD FERGUSSON, Governor-General A PROCLAMATION A. R. p. Being 0 0 32 Lot 13, D.P. S. 7226, being part Motumaoho PURSUANT to subsection (6) of section 5 of the Education No. 2 Block, Block VI, Maungakawa Survey Lands Act 1949, I, Brigadier Sir Bernard Edward Fergusson, District, Borough of Morrinsville. the Governor-General of New Zealand, hereby proclaim and 0 0 37·2 Lot 14, D.P. S. 7226, being part Motumaoho declare that the land described in the Schedule hereto, being No. 2 Block, Block VI, Maungakawa Survey an area vested in the Hawke's Bay Education Board as a site District, Borough of Morrinsville.
    [Show full text]
  • No 58, 20 May 1976, 1117
    No. 58 11 ]7 THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE Published by Authority WELLINGTON : THURSDAY, 20 MAY 1976 CORRIGENDUM Revoking the Orders in Council Defining and Re-Defining Customs Notice-Exchange Rates the Limits 0/ Golden Bay Harbour NOTICE is hereby given that the exchange rates for Finland, DENIS BLUNDELL, Governor-General France, and French Polynesia appearing in my notice, dated 3 May 1976, and published in the New Zealand Gazette, ORDER IN COUNCIL No. 49, dated 6 May 1976, on page 1022, are incorrect and At the Government House at Wellington this 10th day of should read as follows: May 1976 Finland 3.83 Mark Present: France 4.74 Franc HIS EXCELLENCY TIlE GOVERNOR-GENERAL IN COUNCIL French Polynesia 86.28 FP Franc PURSUANT to section 3 of the Harbours Act 1950, His Excel­ Dated at Wellington this 17th day of May 1976. lency the Governor-General, acting by and with the advice J. A. KEAN, Comptroller of Customs. and consent of the Executive Council hereby revokes the Order in Council made on 26 May 1975* defining the limits and the Order in Council made on 29 September 1975t re­ defining the limits of Golden Bay Harbour. P. G. MILLEN, Clerk of the Executive Council. CoRRIGENDUM *New Zealand Gazette, 5 June 1975, p. 1237 tNew Zealand Gazette, 16 October 1975, p. 2275 IN the notice headed "Amending the Licence Authorising Edwin Gerald Baker, Trevor Ian Halsey, Clarence Ronald (M.O.T.43(142(4) Papps, Arthur Lawrence Black, and Allen Clive Colville to Occupy a Site for a Boat Ramp at Tata Beach, Golden Bay", published in New Zealand Gazette, No.
    [Show full text]
  • Actually Or Potentially Within Reach: the Place of China in New Zealand’S Grand Strategy 1965-1972
    Actually or Potentially Within Reach: The Place of China in New Zealand’s Grand Strategy 1965-1972 By David Belgrave A thesis submitted to the Victoria University of Wellington in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Victoria University of Wellington 2016 ABSTRACT In 1965 New Zealand was an active member of alliances designed to contain the People’s Republic of China in South East Asia. Late the previous year, the Defence Council had warned Cabinet that New Zealand could be at war with China and/or Indonesia in six months. Less than seven years later New Zealand recognised China, as Britain and the US military presences were exiting from South East Asia. These events bookend a radical reshaping of New Zealand’s defence policies and its attitude towards China. The existing scholarship on New Zealand’s Cold War defence policies has underemphasised the role of China in New Zealand’s grand strategy and the scholarship on Sino-New Zealand relations has also largely ignored defence policy. This thesis uses recently released files from the Ministry of Defence to provide new insight into the construction of China as a threat during the mid-1960s and the challenges faced in meeting that perceived threat. New Zealand’s Forward Defence policy was one designed to contain China and Beijing-supported revolutionary groups in South East Asia. This strategy was predicated on active British or American support for containment. SEATO and ANZAM provided the basis of New Zealand war planning and day-to-day operations in Asia respectively. With the British decision to withdraw from South East Asia and the American quagmire in Vietnam, New Zealand had to reassess its position in South East Asia as containment of China was no longer thought possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Commemorations in New Zealand and Northern Ireland, 1940–1990
    Remembering the Past, Thinking of the Present: Historic Commemorations in New Zealand and Northern Ireland, 1940–1990 Helen Alexandra Robinson A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctorate of Philosophy, the University of Auckland, 2009. ii iii Abstract This thesis analyses and compares two historic commemorations in Northern Ireland with two in New Zealand, in the period from 1940 to 1990. These commemorations are the Twelfth of July and Remembrance Sunday in Northern Ireland, and Waitangi Day and Anzac Day in New Zealand. Examination of these commemorations has revealed several patterns. In the commemorations studied in this thesis, levels of public adherence generally depended on the extent to which the values that the commemoration symbolised were seen as threatened or highly needed. The commemorations which reaffirmed compelling values tended to enjoy higher levels of public support than those expressing values which were seen as either unnecessary or unthreatened. In both countries, historic commemorations were capable of uniting communities behind core values. However, in cases where there was no general agreement on what those values were or what they meant, commemorations frequently became sites of division and conflict. All four commemorations were regularly used by organisers and participants to express views on contemporary political and social issues and, on several occasions in both countries, different groups battled for the control of particular commemorations. In both countries, increased levels of social conflict often led to the increased use of the past as a rhetorical device. The main conclusion to be drawn from this study is that these historic commemora- tions derived more of their meaning from their contemporary context than from the historical events which they commemorated.
    [Show full text]