Paparan Sosialisasi Kebijakan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Paparan Sosialisasi Kebijakan DASAR KEGIATAN : Peraturan Presiden Nomor 15 Tahun 2010 tentang Percepatan Penanggulangan Kemiskinan; Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 42 Tahun 2010 Tentang Tim Koordinasi Penanggulangan Kemiskinan Provinsi dan Kabupaten/Kota; Keputusan Menteri Koordinastor Bidang Kesejahteraan Rakyat Selaku Ketua Tim Koordinasi Penanggulangan Kemiskinan Nasional Nomor: 19/KEP/MENKO/KESRA/VII/2009, Tentang Pedoman Umum Koordinasi Penanggulangan Kemiskinan. Keputusan Menteri Sosial RI No. 24/HUK/2015 Tanggal 2 Maret 2015 tentang Indeks dan Komponen bantuan PKH 2015. GAMBARAN RINGKAS KONDISI KEMISKINAN PROVINSI SUMATERA UTARA Jumlah Penduduk Nasional Tahun 2015 46.500.000 Jawa Tengah Banten 40.200.000 DI Yogyakarta 35.500.000 Sumatera Utara 14.150.000 Jawa Barat 11.700.000 DKI Jakarta 9.900.000 Gorontalo 8.800.000 Kepulauan Riau 8.250.000 Bengkulu 8.150.000 Riau 6.000.000 Nusa Tenggara Timur 5.250.000 Sumatera Barat 5.150.000 Kalimantan Barat 5.100.000 Nusa Tenggara Barat 5.050.000 Aceh 4.800.000 Bali 4.300.000 Kalimantan Timur 4.050.000 Kalimantan Selatan 4.000.000 Jawa Timur 3.600.000 Sumatera Selatan 3.250.000 Perkembangan Jumlah Penduduk Sumut Papua 3.100.000 Sulawesi Selatan 2.800.000 Kalimantan Tengah 2.550.000 14.150.000 Sulawesi Utara 2.500.000 Sulawesi Barat 2.450.000 13.766.851 Kepulauan Bangka Belitung 2.050.000 Maluku 1.950.000 13.326.307 13.215.401 Jambi 1.800.000 13.103.596 Lampung 1.300.000 Sulawesi Tenggara 1.250.000 Sulawesi Tengah 1.200.000 Maluku Utara 1.150.000 Papua Barat 880.000 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Kalimantan Utara 800.000 IPM Kab/Kota Provinsi Sumatera Utara Tahun 2015 M e d a n 78,87 Pematangsiantar 76,34 B i n j a i 73,81 Toba Samosir 73,40 Tebing Tinggi 72,81 Padangsidimpuan 72,80 Deli Serdang 72,79 K a r o 72,69 S i b o l g a 71,64 Tapanuli Utara 71,32 Simalungun 71,24 Labuhanbatu 70,23 Labuhanbatu Utara 69,69 Labuhanbatu Selatan 69,67 Sumatera Utara 69,51 D a i r i 69,00 L a n g k a t 68,53 Samosir 68,43 A s a h a n 68,40 Serdang Bedagai 68,01 Tapanuli Selatan 67,63 Padang Lawas Utara 67,35 Tapanuli Tengah 67,06 Tanjungbalai 66,74 Gunungsitoli 66,41 • Indeks Pembangunan Manusia (IPM) Kota Humbang Hasundutan 66,03 Tanjungbalai pada tahun 2015 sebesar 66,74 Batu Bara 66,02 point, masih berada di bawah capaian Indeks Padang Lawas 65,99 Pakpak Bharat 65,53 Pembangunan Manusia Sumatera Utara pada Mandailing Natal 63,99 tahun yang sama sebesar 69,51 point. Nias Utara 59,88 N i a s 58,85 Nias Selatan 58,74 Nias Barat 58,25 PERKEMBANGAN TINGKAT DAN JUMLAH PENDUDUK MISKIN Dari data hasil Survey Sosial Ekonomi Nasional Jumlah Penduduk Persentase Penduduk No Provinsi Tahun 2015, Provinsi Sumatera Utara tidak Miskin (000 orang) Miskin (%) termasuk ke dalam 10 Provinsi dengan tingkat 1 Papua 898.210 28,4 kemiskinan tertinggi. Meskipun terjadi kenaikan 2 Papua Barat 225.540 25,73 3 1.160.530 persentase kemiskinan di Sumatera Utara pada Nusa Tenggara Timur 22,58 4 Maluku 327.770 19,36 tahun 2015 dari 9,85 persen menjadi 10,79 5 Gorontalo 206.520 18,16 persen dengan tingkat kemiskinan terbesar berada 6 Bengkulu 322.830 17,16 di wilayah perdesaan mencapai 11,06 persen 7 Aceh 859.410 17,11 (727,760 jiwa) dan wilayah perkotaan mencapai 8 Nusa Tenggara Barat 802.290 16,54 9 Sulawesi Tengah 406.340 14,07 10,51 persen (780.380 jiwa). 10 Sumatera Selatan 1.112.530 13,77 Perkembangan Tingkat Kemiskinan Sumut Perkembangan Angka Kemiskinan Sumut Perkotaan Perdesaan 11,33% 11,53 11,06 10,2810,53 10,4510,13 10,51 10,79% 10,1 9,81 9,4 10,39% 10,41% 9,85% 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Persentase Kemiskinan Kab/Kota Provinsi Sumatera Utara Tahun 2015 Nias Utara 32,62 Angka kemiskinan kabupaten/kota se Nias Barat 29,96 Gunungsitoli 25,42 Sumatera Utara pada tahun 2015 Nias Selatan 19,05 memperlihatkan bahwa Kabupaten Nias 18,05 Tanjungbalai 15,08 dengan angka kemiskinan tertinggi masih Tapanuli Tengah 15 Samosir 14,11 didominasi Kabupaten/Kota di Sibolga 13,48 Kepulauan Nias, yaitu Nias Utara (32,62 Batu Bara 12,61 Asahan 12,09 persen), Nias Barat (29,96 persen), Kota Tebing Tinggi 12,03 Gunung Sitoli (25,42 persen), Nias Labuhanbatu Selatan 11,65 Tapanuli Utara 11,41 Selatan (19,05 persen) dan Nias (18,05 Tapanuli Selatan 11,37 persen). Labuanbatu Utara 11,31 Langkat 11,3 Pakpak Bharat 11,26 Sedangkan 5 Kabupaten/Kota dengan Mandailing Natal 11,13 Padang Lawas Utara 10,97 capaian angka kemiskinan terendah Simalungun 10,96 adalah Kabupaten Deli Serdang (4,74 SUMATERA UTARA 10,53 Pematangsiantar 10,47 persen), Kota Binjai (7,03 Toba Samosir 10,21 Humbang Hasundutan 9,85 persen), Kabupaten Padang Lawas (8,73 Karo 9,68 persen) Kabupaten Labuhanbatu (8,99 Serdang Bedagai 9,59 Medan 9,41 persen) dan Kabupaten Dairi (9,09 Dairi 9,09 persen), sedangkan Kota Tanjungbalai Labuhan Batu 8,99 Padangsidimpuan 8,77 (15,08 persen) Padang Lawas 8,73 Binjai 7,03 Deli Serdang 4,74 Sumber : Publikasi BPS, 2015 (data diolah) Indeks Kedalaman Kemiskinan (P1) Kab/Kota Tahun 2015 Nias Utara 5,84 Menurut Nias Barat 5,79 Kabupaten/Kota, menunjukkan Gunung Sitoli 4,33 Nias 3,31 sebanyak 11 Kabupaten/Kota di Nias Selatan 2,67 Sumatera Utara memiliki capaian Sibolga 2,41 Tanjung Balai 2,23 Indeks Kedalaman Kemiskinan di Tapanuli Tengah 2 Labuhanbatu Utara 1,75 atas capaian Provinsi, yaitu Kab. Padang Sidimpuan 1,71 Nias Utara, Nias Barat, Gunung Langkat 1,7 Sumatera Utara 1,65 Sitoli, Nias, Nias Selatan, Tanjung Tapanuli Utara 1,61 Balai, Tapteng, Labura, P. Asahan 1,6 Tebing Tinggi 1,48 Sidempuan dan Langkat. Labuhanbatu Selatan 1,48 Samosir 1,48 Batu Bara 1,46 Mandailing Natal 1,41 Pematang Siantar 1,39 Karo 1,38 Tapanuli Selatan 1,28 Serdang Bedagai 1,25 Humbang Hasundutan 1,24 Padang Lawas Utara 1,23 Simalungun 1,22 Medan 1,21 Pakpak Bharat 1,19 Toba Samosir 1,12 Labuhan Batu 0,99 Padang Lawas Utara 0,91 Dairi 0,91 Binjai 0,81 Deli Serdang 0,47 Indeks Keparahan Kemiskinan (P2) Kab/Kota Tahun 2015 Menurut Nias Barat 1,72 Kabupaten/Kota, menunjukka Nias Utara 1,6 Gunung Sitoli 1,16 n sebanyak 9 Kabupaten/Kota Nias 1,01 di Sumatera Utara memiliki Sibolga 0,69 Nias Selatan 0,62 capaian Indeks Keparahan Padang Sidimpuan 0,53 Kemiskinan di atas capaian Tanjung Balai 0,46 Tapanuli Tengah 0,45 Provinsi, yaitu Kab. Nias Sumatera Utara 0,42 Utara, Nias Barat, Gunung Langkat 0,42 Labuhanbatu Utara 0,36 Sitoli, Nias, Nias Asahan 0,36 Selatan, Binjai, Tanjung Tapanuli Utara 0,35 Karo 0,34 Balai, Tapteng, dan P. Pematang Siantar 0,32 Sidempuan . Batu Bara 0,31 Serdang Bedagai 0,3 Samosir 0,3 Mandailing Natal 0,3 Tebing Tinggi 0,29 Labuhanbatu Selatan 0,29 Humbang Hasundutan 0,27 Simalungun 0,26 Medan 0,24 Padang Lawas Utara 0,22 Tapanuli Selatan 0,22 Toba Samosir 0,21 Labuhan Batu 0,2 Padang Lawas Utara 0,18 Pakpak Bharat 0,18 Binjai 0,17 Dairi 0,15 Deli Serdang 0,09 Garis Kemiskinan Menurut Kabupaten/Kota di Sumut Tahun 2015 Kota Medan 401.417 Kota Pematang Siantar 387.899 Sedangkan menurut SUMATERA UTARA 366.137 K a r o 343.225 kabupaten/kota, hanya Kota Tebing Tinggi 342.964 2 kota yang garis Kota Sibolga 342.384 Labuhan Batu Utara 321.487 kemiskinanannya di Nias Utara 316.674 Kota Tanjung Balai 311.787 atas Provinsi yaitu Kota Batu Bara 310.494 Medan dan Kota Kota Binjai 310.384 Kota Padang Sidempuan 304.508 Pematang Siantar. Nias Barat 299.555 Tapanuli Tengah 298.573 Labuhan Batu Selatan 294.334 Langkat 294.175 Deli Serdang 293.551 Tapanuli Selatan 293.441 Serdang Bedagai 291.732 Labuhan Batu 289.625 Kota Gunungsitoli 288.112 Tapanuli Utara 283.464 Toba Samosir 282.744 N i a s 280.008 Simalungun 274.867 Mandailing Natal 268.034 Dairi 255.130 Humbang Hasundutan 254.633 Asahan 254.253 Padang Lawas Utara 246.951 Padang Lawas 240.131 Samosir 235.355 Nias Selatan 215.835 Pakpak Bharat 212.009 Indeks Gini Kab/KotaTahun 2015 Menurut Tebing Tinggi 0,4 kabupaten/kota, terdapat 8 Gunungsitoli 0,37 kab/kota yang memiliki Medan 0,37 Pematangsiantar 0,36 Indeks Gini di atas Tanjungbalai 0,36 Provinsi, yaitu Kota Tebing Tapanuli Utara 0,36 Tapanuli Tengah 0,36 Tinggi, GunungSitoli, Sibolga 0,35 Medan, P. Siantar, Tanjung Sumatera Utara 0,34 Karo 0,34 Balai,Kab.Taput, Tapteng, Toba Samosir 0,33 dan Kota Binjai. Padangsidimpuan 0,32 Deli Serdang 0,32 Simalungun 0,32 Labuhan Batu 0,31 Labuanbatu Utara 0,3 Padang Lawas 0,3 Pakpak Bharat 0,3 Serdang Bedagai 0,29 Samosir 0,29 Mandailing Natal 0,29 Batu Bara 0,28 Dairi 0,28 Padang Lawas Utara 0,27 Humbang Hasundutan 0,27 Langkat 0,27 Asahan 0,27 Nias Utara 0,26 Labuhanbatu Selatan 0,26 Binjai 0,25 Nias Barat 0,25 Nias 0,25 Nias Selatan 0,24 Sumber : Publikasi BPS, 2015 (data diolah) Tapanuli Selatan 0,23 BIDANG PENDIDIKAN Partisipasi Sekolah Usia 7-12 tahun Menurut Kab/Kota Tahun 2015 Langkat 100 Padang Sidempuan 100 Binjai 100 Medan 100 Tebing Tinggi 100 Pematang Siantar 100 Sibolga 100 Nias Barat 100 Labuhan Batu Selatan 100 Padang Lawas 100 Serdang Bedagai 100 Samosir 100 Humbang Hasundutan 100 Deli Serdang 100 Dairi 100 Simalungun 100 Labuhan Batu 100 Toba Samosir 100 Tapanuli Utara 100 Tapanuli Tengah 100 Nias Selatan 99,28 SUMATERA UTARA 99,16 Nias Utara 98,9 N i a s 98,86 Asahan 98,8 Padang Lawas Utara 98,7 Tanjung Balai 97,97 Gunungsitoli 97,95 Labuhan Batu Utara 97,74 Mandailing Natal 97,51 Tapanuli Selatan 96,41 Pakpak Bharat 96,26 Batu Bara 95,92 K a r o 94,38 Partisipasi Sekolah Usia 13-15 tahun Menurut Kab/Kota Tahun 2015 Padang Sidempuan 100 Binjai 100 Sibolga 100 Padang Lawas 100 Partisipasi Sekolah Usia 13- Pakpak Bharat 100 Humbang Hasundutan 100 15 tahun Kota Tanjungbalai Dairi 100 Labuhan Batu 100 perlu perhatian yang serius Tapanuli Utara 100 untuk dilakukan upaya- Nias Selatan 98,5 Labuhan Batu Selatan 97,51 upaya agar angka partisipasi Asahan 96,84 Medan 96,54 Sekolah Usia tersebut dapat Gunungsitoli 95,91 meningkat setiap tahunnya.
Recommended publications
  • Institutional Strengthening in Waste Management in Medan, Binjai, Deli Serdang, Karo (Mebidangro)
    Institutional Strengthening in Waste Management in Medan, Binjai, Deli Serdang, Karo (Mebidangro) Hatta Ridho1, M. Arif Nasution2, Subhilhar3, Muryanto Amin4 1,2,3,4 University of Sumatera, Indonesia [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract Keywords institutional strengthening; Weak coordination can also be seen in the achievement of cooperation agreements between regions in the Mebidangro area. mebidangro; waste area For example, how the weak coordination between Pemko Medan and Pemko Deli Serdang resulted in the closure of the TPA Namo Bintang in Pancur Batu sub-district, even though Presidential Decree No. 62/2011 has designated TPA Namo Bintang together with TPAatuh in Medan Marelan as a garbage landfill for residents of Medan city. Weak coordination certainly requires institutional strengthening that can ensure synergy among government ranks in the Mebidangro area to be able to overcome problems faced together. This research was conducted in the Mebidangro area by using qualitative which focused on the problems that existed at the time of the research or the actual problems as well as the facts about the problems being investigated as they were, accompanied by sufficient rational interpretation. Data collection techniques through observation, interviews and limited group discussions. The character of the Mebidangro implementing organs has not shown an orderly working mechanism, where the two main components of the character of the implementing organs, namely the SOP and the division of tasks / authorities between the provincial government and district / city governments as well as between district / city governments throughout the Mebidangro region do not exist.
    [Show full text]
  • Produk Domestik Regional Bruto Per Kapita Dan Pembangunan Ekonomi Yang Inklusif Dan Berkeadilan Di Kabupaten Toba Samosir
    PRODUK DOMESTIK REGIONAL BRUTO PER KAPITA DAN PEMBANGUNAN EKONOMI YANG INKLUSIF DAN BERKEADILAN DI KABUPATEN TOBA SAMOSIR Oleh: Dr. Henrykus Sihaloho, M. Si Abstract The goals of this research were to acquire overview of Regional Domestic Product (GRDP) per capita and to design inclusive and righteous economic growth (growth with equity). Toba Samosir Regency’s Gross Regional Domestic Product (GRDP) per capita at Current Market Prices 2000 in 2013 was increasing every year, meanwhile GRDP per capita in 2009-2013 at Constant Market Prices 2000 showed the economic growth increased significantly in Toba Samosir Regency and North Sumatera Province. In order to actualize inclusive and righteous economic growth in Toba Samosir Regency, the government of this regency will have to introduce mina-rice (fish-paddy) programme. Introducing thia programme with labor intensive will be potential to increase income and to provide job opportunities labor occasion as well as ti decrease overloaded fish nurture. The government of Toba Samosir Regency should invite investors to build some feed industries of corn-soybean meal. PENDAHULUAN Latar Belakang Bagi sebuah daerah otonom seperti Kabupaten Toba Samosir keberhasilan pembangunan ekonomi bertumpu pada dua tujuan pokok: memajukan kesejahteraan umum dan membangun secara inklusif dan berkeadilan. Dalam kaitan dengan yang pertama, memajukan kesejahteraan umum identik dengan meningkatkan taraf hidup masyarakat, memperbesar kesempatan kerja, meningkatkan pemerataan pendapatan masyarakat, meningkatkan hubungan ekonomi, dan mengusahakan pergeseran kegiatan ekonomi dari sektor primer ke sektor sekunder dan tersier. Guna memajukan kesejahteran umum di atas, seperti dikemukakan, analisis pertumbuhan ekonomi per sektor melalui pengukuran PDRB penting dilakukan. Pengukuran PDRB akan bisa memberi gambaran laju pertumbuhan setiap sektor dan kemampuan sumber daya ekonomi yang dihasilkan oleh daerah tersebut.
    [Show full text]
  • North Sumatra
    PROVINCE INFOGRAPHIC NORTH SUMATRA ACEH Langsa KOTA BARAT ACEH LAN GSA TEN GAH ACEH TIMU R Karang Baru Suka Makmue ACEH NAGAN TAMIANG Meulaboh RAYA GAYO LUES Blang Kejeren Kembar Stabat KOTA ACEH MEDAN Blangpidie BARAT The boundaries and names shown and the DAYA Binjai Medan SERDANG LANGKAT KOTA designations used on this map do not imply Medan BEDA GAI ACEH BINJAI official endorsement or acceptance by the Lubuk Sei Rampah SELATAN Kutacane Pakam Tebing KOTA United Nations. DELI Tinggi TEB INGTIN GGI ACEH SERDANG TEN GGARA Tapak BATU Tuan KARO Sibayak BARA Legend: Sinabung Limapuluh KOTA TANJUNGBALAI Administrative Boundary Kabanjahe Raya DAIRI Pematangsiantar Kisaran KOTA Tanjung Province Province Capital PEMATANGSIANTAR SIMA LUN GUN Balai Sidikalang District District Capital KOTA SUBU LUSSALAM SAMOSIR ASAH AN Subulussalam PAKPAK Pangururan Toba Transportation Population BARAT Population counts at 1km resolution Salak Aek Kanopan Toll road Sinabang ACEH TO BA LABUHANBATU SIN GKIL UTARA Primary road 0 HUMBANG SAMOSIR SIMEULU E Balige LABUHANBATU Secondary road 1 - 5 HASUNDUTAN Port 6 - 25 Singkil Dolok Sanggul Bagan Siapi-api TAPANULI Imun Airport 26 - 50 TENGAH TAPANULI Rantau LABUHANBATU Prapat UTARA Helatoba-Tarutung SELATAN 51 - 100 Tarutung Other 101 - 500 Kota Pinang 501 - 2,500 ROKAN Volcano KOTA TAPANULI HILIR Water/Lake 2,501 - 5,000 SIB OLGA SELATAN Sibolga PADANG 5,000 - 130,000 Pandan Sipirok Coastline/River Sibualbuali LAWAS UTARA Lubukraya KOTA Gunung Tua Lotu GUNUNGSITOLI NIAS Padang BENGKALIS UTARA Gunung Sitoli Sidempuan
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Education and Family Support Factor on Compliance with Taking Anti Tuberculosis Drugs (OAT) in Pulmonary Tuberculosis (TB) Patients in Tebing Tinggi City
    International Journal of Science and Healthcare Research DOI: https://doi.org/10.52403/ijshr.20210461 Vol.6; Issue: 2; April-June 2021 Website: ijshr.com Research Paper ISSN: 2455-7587 Analysis of Education and Family Support Factor on Compliance with Taking Anti Tuberculosis Drugs (OAT) in Pulmonary Tuberculosis (TB) Patients in Tebing Tinggi City Evi Novalita Tarigan1, Rahayu Lubis2, Erna Mutiara3 1,2,3Universitas Sumatera Utara, Indonesia Corresponding Author: Evi Novalita Tarigan ABSTRACT health center (Puskesmas), and facilitate patients with an android-based OAT drinking calendar Indonesia ranks second in the world as a country application. that has the number of tuberculosis sufferers after India. Although directly observed short- Keywords: Education, Family Support, course treatment (DOTS) recommended by the Compliance with Taking Anti Tuberculosis World Health Organization (WHO) has proven Drugs (OAT) to be very effective in the treatment of tuberculosis, patient compliance with anti INTRODUCTION tuberculosis drugs (OAT) is a major obstacle in Tuberculosis is one of the ten controlling tuberculosis. The purpose of this leading causes of death in the world, and the study was to analyze of education and family leading cause of death caused by infectious support factors in compliance with taking anti diseases. The problem of TB in the world is tuberculosis drugs (OAT) in Pulmonary Tuberculosis (TB) Patients in Tebing Tinggi getting worse with the emergence of the City. The populations in this study were all HIV/AIDS pandemic, TB-RO and the tuberculosis patients in Tebing Tinggi City from incidence of Covid-19. It is estimated that January to December 2020. A sample of 78 the Covid-19 pandemic could cause an people was obtained using purposive sampling additional 6.3 million TB cases globally technique.
    [Show full text]
  • Title, This Is a Template for Conference Abstract
    Does the Current Distribution of Fruit Commodities in North Sumatra Help to Enhance the Regional Economic Development? Dany Juhandi1, Ardian Elonard Purba2 {[email protected]} Politeknik Wilmar Bisnis Indonesia, Indonesia1, 2 Abstract. Fruit commodity is one of the most imported agricultural commodities. However, the government did not pay enough attention to agricultural policies for this commodity. Farmers also prefer to plant food and plantation commodities. Meanwhile, increasing consumption of fruits creates opportunities for farmers and the government to meet domestic demand. It increases due to the consumption factor of the population. Fruit consumption is currently showing an increasing trend because public awareness to consume fruits continues to increase. To meet domestic demand, the fruit market is filled with imported fruits. We need an appropriate development plan for fruit commodities which has an impact on regional economic development. This study aims (1) to analyze potential fruit commodities in North Sumatra, (2) to analyze specialization and localization of fruit commodities, and (3) to analyze priority fruit commodities in North Sumatra. The research methodology used in this paper is quantitative descriptive using secondary data from 2017- 2018. The results of the study show that (1) each district in North Sumatra has a very varied fruit commodity base, (2) there are no districts in North Sumatra that specialized in producing certain fruit commodities, (3) the priority fruit commodities are still monotonous. Planning of fruit commodities development has not been specialized so that the objectives of regional economic development based on horticultural commodities are difficult to achieve. Keywords: Regional Economic Development 1 Introduction Fruit commodity is one of horticulture commodity that is less considered compared to food commodities such as rice, corn, and soybeans.
    [Show full text]
  • GUNUNGSITOLI TAHUN 2020 Pemerintah Kota Gunungsitoli
    PROFIL POTENSI DAERAH KOTA GUNUNGSITOLI TAHUN 2020 Pemerintah Kota Gunungsitoli KATA PENGANTAR Menyadari pentingnya ketersediaan data dan informasi bagi pembangunan perekonomian daerah, maka Pemerintah Kota Gunungsitoli menyusun data dan informasi potensi daerah dalam bentuk Profil Potensi Kota Gunungsitoli. Profil Potensi Kota Gunungsitoli ini disusun secara komprehensif dan reliable untuk memberikan gambaran potensi- potensi ekonomi di Kota Gunungsitoli yang dapat dikembangkan melalui intervensi sektor swasta dalam bentuk investasi di daerah. Besar harapan kami dengan adanya Profil Potensi Kota Gunungsitoli akan menguatkan dan menumbuhkan investasi daerah serta memajukan perekonomian Kota Gunungsitoli pada khususnya dan Provinsi Sumatera Utara pada umumnya. Demikian Profil Potensi Daerah ini disusun sebagai bahan bagi para pemangku kepentingan terkait dan para investor yang ingin berinvestasi di Kota Gunungsitoli. Gunungsitoli, 23 November 2020 PROFIL Potensi Kota Gunungsitoli Tahun 2020 i Pemerintah Kota Gunungsitoli DAFTAR ISI Kata Pengantar .......................................................................... i Daftar Isi .................................................................................... ii BAB I PENDAHULUAN ............................................................... 1 A. Gambaran Umum Daerah ............................................. 1 1. Aspek Geografis ...................................................... 1 2. Aspek Demografis ................................................... 4 3. Klimatologi ............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • North Sumatra
    NORTH SUMATRA The USAID Indonesia Urban Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Penyehatan Lingkungan untuk Semua (IUWASH PLUS) project is a five-and-a-half-year initiative designed to assist the Government of Indonesia in increasing access to water supply and sanitation services as well as improving key hygiene behaviors among urban poor and vulnerable populations. USAID IUWASH PLUS works with governmental and donor agencies, the private PLUS NORTH SUMATRA sector, NGOs, communities and others to achieve the following "high level" results: • An increase access to improved water supply service for 1,100,000 people USAID IUWASH in urban areas of which at least 500,000 are from the poorest 40% of the population (also referred to as the “bottom 40%” or “B40”); and • An increase access to safely managed sanitation for 500,000 people in urban areas. USAID IUWASH PLUS works with 35 Local Governments across Indonesia located in 8 provinces that includes North Sumatra, West Java, Central Java, East Java, South Sulawesi, Maluku, North Maluku and Papua, and 2 special areas in DKI Jakarta and Tangerang district. In North Sumatra, USAID IUWASH PLUS works in five cities/districts located in Medan city, Deli Serdang district, Tebing Tinggi city, Pematangsiantar city and Sibolga city. 72,981 km² Is the area of North Sumatra province that has 25 districts, 8 cities, 444 14.73 million is the population of North Sumatra sub-districts, 693 urban province and it is the fourth province with the largest villages, 5,417 villages, and population after West Java, Central Java and East Java with the 419 islands.
    [Show full text]
  • North Sumatra's 2018 Election: Identity Politics Ruled The
    ISSUE: 2018 No. 60 ISSN 2335-6677 RESEARCHERS AT ISEAS – YUSOF ISHAK INSTITUTE ANALYSE CURRENT EVENTS Singapore |1 October 2018 North Sumatra’s 2018 Election: Identity Politics Ruled the Day Deasy Simandjuntak* EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • The North Sumatra gubernatorial election was among the largest local elections this year. • Edy Rahmayadi, a former commander of the army strategic command, and his running- mate, Musa Rajeckshah, a local businessman, were supported by Gerindra, PKS, PAN, Golkar, Hanura, Nasdem, and Democrat party. They defeated PDIP’s candidate Djarot Saiful Hidayat, former Jakarta vice-governor, and his running-mate, a young Jakarta- based businessman Sihar Sitorus. • Voters’ preferences were influenced by identity politics. Muslim districts overwhelmingly voted for the all-Muslim ticket (Edy-Musa) and Christian districts for the religiously combined ticket (Djarot-Sihar). • On the surface, North Sumatra’s election resembled national politics as PDIP went head-to-head with Gerindra-PKS. However, the fact that other ruling coalition parties like Golkar, Hanura and Nasdem, supported Gerindra-PKS dampened the rivalry between the coalitions. • Due to the fluidity of coalitions, pilkada results are not the best indicators for the upcoming presidential and legislative elections. However, the North Sumatra pilkada provided a training ground for party machineries for 2019. * Deasy Simandjuntak is Associate Fellow in the Indonesia Studies Programme at ISEAS Yusof - Ishak Institute 1 ISSUE: 2018 No. 60 ISSN 2335-6677 INTRODUCTION On 27 June 2018, Indonesian voters in 171 regions voted for governors, mayors and regents. This was the third simultaneous regional elections (pilkada) held since 2015. With 152 million eligible voters and a turnout of 77.5% on gubernatorial, 75.56% on regency, and 73.82% on mayoral, elections,1 this year’s pilkada was among the world’s largest one-day elections.
    [Show full text]
  • North Sumatera
    ISSN (Print) : 2319-8613 ISSN (Online) : 0975-4024 Wesli / International Journal of Engineering and Technology (IJET) Analysis Water Balance of Lake Toba as Source an Integrated Water Regional Management (IWRM) North Sumatera Wesli Department of Civil Engineering, Universitas Malikussaleh, Province of Aceh, Indonesia Cot Tengku Nie, Kecamatan Muara Batu, Kabupaten Aceh Utara, Aceh, Indonesia Telephone +62645-41373, Fax +6245-44450 Email: [email protected] Abstract - The needs of raw water in Medan city increases every year in line with the population growth, whereas the quality of hygienic water in the river is insufficient. Therefore, it needs another alternative source to meet the standard quality with low cost. One of the potential sources is Lake Toba. To meet the needs North Sumatera Provincial Government intends to use Lake Toba, but it is feared that the decline of normal water level will disrupt the cruise ship, especially when anchored at the port. The Government plans a water supply system in Integrated Water Regional Management (IWRM) to be used collectively to be efficient in construction and operation. This study aims to determine the water balance of Lake Toba if used as a regional water supply and impact on normal water levels. In this paper, the normal water levels were analyzed by inflow and outflow, not based on elevations above sea level. The method of analysis is water balance analysis done in two parts, analysis of water debit requirement (output) and analysis of water supply (input) in a hydrological analysis. Comparison of the water balance is a consideration for conclusions. The results showed that the required debit was 82.37 m3/ sec (output discharge) while the supply of rainfall as reliable discharge was 121.79 m3/sec.
    [Show full text]
  • Koni Kota/Kabupaten Anggota Koni Sumatera Utara
    KONI KOTA/KABUPATEN ANGGOTA KONI SUMATERA UTARA CONTACT MASA NO KONI PENGURUS ALAMAT SEKRETARIAT PERSON BAKTI TGL KETERANGAN KETUA : Nurkarim Nehe, SE,MSP 085762800099 2015 - 2019 Jl. Jend. Sudirman Kompleks Perkantoran 1 ASAHAN SEKRETARIS : Efi Irwansyah Pane 28-Dec-19 Terminal Kisaran KETUA : H. Juli Sawitma, Nst, SH, MH 081397416779 2016 - 2020 Gedung Olahraga (GOR) Jl. Jambi Binjai 2 BINJAI SEKRETARIS : Ahyal Muhajar 21-Dec-20 Dinas Pariwisata Kebudayaan Pemuda dan KETUA : Faisal Makmur Zebua 2016 - 2020 Olahraga Kota Gunung Sitoli 3 GUNUNG SITOLI SEKRETARIS : Sonitehe Gea, SE 8-Dec-20 Jl. Kartini II No. 02 Kel. Pasar Gunungsitoli KETUA : Drs. Eddy H Sibarani 08126079014 2016 - 2020 Jl. Stadion No. 89 OP (Kompleks Stadion Teladan) 4 MEDAN SEKRETARIS : Ahmad Haswin Nasution. ST 8-May-15 Telp/Fax : 061 - 7326262/7322626 KETUA : H. Syaiful Jamil Hasibuan 2018 - 2022 Jl. Jend S. Parman No. 01 Kel. Bincar 5 PADANGSIDIMPUAN SEKRETARIS : Drs. Syahrumsyah 15-Jan-18 Padang Sidimpuan Jl. Pantoan No.6 Kel. Pahlawan Kec. Siantar KETUA : Jayadi Sagala, SE 2016 - 2020 Timur, P. Siantar 6 PEMATANGSIANTAR SEKRETARIS : Richard Simanjuntak, S. Pd 17-Mar-20 KETUA : Azlinda N. Hutagalung 082366668998 2014 - 2018 Jl. Jln.Diponegoro No.11 Sibolga 7 SIBOLGA Belum Musda SEKRETARIS : Drs. Misran Tanjung 081263361156 30-Apr-14 Telp. (0631) KETUA : Freddy Lizaro Sitorus 085361783606 2016 - 2020 Jl. Karya Tanjung Balai 8 TANJUNG BALAI SEKRETARIS : Syaifuddin Ys 25-Jan-20 Telp. (0623) 596256 KETUA : Hadi Suriono, SE, MM 08126471021 2013 - 2017 Jl. Pelajar No. 1 Limapuluh Kec. Lima Puluh 9 BATUBARA Belum Musda SEKRETARIS : Riki Gunawan Nasution, S.Pd 24-Jun-14 KETUA : Halim P.
    [Show full text]
  • RENCANA KERJA DAN ANGGARAN SATUAN KERJA PERANGKAT DAERAH Formulir RKA SKPD PEMERINTAH PROVINSI SUMATERA UTARA 2.2 Tahun Anggaran : 2019
    RENCANA KERJA DAN ANGGARAN SATUAN KERJA PERANGKAT DAERAH Formulir RKA SKPD PEMERINTAH PROVINSI SUMATERA UTARA 2.2 Tahun Anggaran : 2019 Urusan Pemerintahan : 3 . 05 URUSAN PEMERINTAHAN PILIHAN Energi dan Sumberdaya Mineral Organisasi : 3 . 05 . 01 Dinas Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral Sub Unit Organisasi : 3 . 05 . 01 . 01 Dinas Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral REKAPITULASI ANGGARAN BELANJA LANGSUNG BERDASARKAN PROGRAM DAN KEGIATAN SATUAN KERJA PERANGKAT DAERAH JUMLAH LOKASI TARGET KINERJA KODE URAIAN KEGIATAN (KUANTITATIF) Tahun n Tahun Belanja Pegawai Barang & Jasa Modal Jumlah n + 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 = 5 + 6 + 7 9 3.05 . 3.05.01 . 01 Program Pelayanan Administrasi Perkantoran 1,404,640,000.00 3,161,068,284.00 16,000,000.00 4,581,708,284.00 0.00 3.05 . 3.05.01 . 01 . 01 Penyediaan Jasa Surat Menyurat Medan 0.00 29,996,000.00 0.00 29,996,000.00 0.00 3.05 . 3.05.01 . 01 . 02 Penyediaan Jasa Komunikasi, Sumber Daya Air dan Listrik Medan 0.00 265,000,000.00 0.00 265,000,000.00 0.00 3.05 . 3.05.01 . 01 . 03 Penyediaan Jasa Administrasi Perkantoran/keuangan Medan 1,003,980,000.00 0.00 0.00 1,003,980,000.00 0.00 3.05 . 3.05.01 . 01 . 04 Penyediaan Jasa Kebersihan Kantor Medan 0.00 265,650,000.00 0.00 265,650,000.00 0.00 3.05 . 3.05.01 . 01 . 05 Penyediaan Alat Tulis Kantor Medan 0.00 79,999,190.00 0.00 79,999,190.00 0.00 3.05 .
    [Show full text]
  • Due to a Climate Change in North Sumatra Province
    Indonesian Journal of Agricultural Research Vol. 01, No. 01, 2018 | 51 – 57 I n J A R Indonesian Journal of Agricultural Research Effect of Irrigation on the Changes in Wetland Rice Productivity (Oryza Sativa L.) due to a Climate Change in North Sumatra Province Hasbul Hadi and Diana Chalil Agribusiness Study Program, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Indonesia Abstract. Climate change is one of serious threats to the agricultural sector. In North Sumatra Province, climate change is characterized by shorter rainy season with higher rainfall. To overcome such climate change, it is necessary to provide irrigation that can accommodate excessive rain water and distribute it in times of shortage. Therefore, changes in rainfall will not be too influential on productivity. This is especially important for plants that need a lot of water like rice. To analyze the influence of irrigation in North Sumatra Province, the data were collected from 27 regencies/cities in 2011 – 2015 and were analyzed using a Simple Linear Regression analysis model. The estimation results show that irrigation can push the productivity variances. The irrigation regression coefficient of - 0.133432 shows that each increase of irrigation area by 1% will decrease the productivity variation by 0.13 tons/ha. Keywords: irrigation, productivity, rainfall, wetland rice Received 02 March 2018 | Revised 23 March 2018 | Accepted 26 March 2018 1. Introduction Climate has an important role in supporting the growth and production of crops. Climate components include temperature, humidity and rainfall. Climate cycles may experience changes that have negative impacts such as a shortened rainy season but with high rainfall.
    [Show full text]