DOCSLIB.ORG

Sunwater Rookwood Weir Project Turtle Species Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sunwater Rookwood Weir Project Turtle Species Management Plan Sunwater Rookwood Weir Turtle Species Management Program 41-29978-02-AP-RPT-0008 October 2020 Glossary Abbreviation / acronym Definition AEIS Addendum Environmental Impact Statement AHD Australian Height Datum AMTD Adopted Middle Thread Distribution CEMP Construction Environmental Management Plan cm Centimetre CoG Queensland Government’s Coordinator General DEHP Department of Environment and Heritage Protection DERM Department of Environment and Resource Management DES Department of Environment and Science DNRME Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy EIS Environmental Impact Statement EP Act Environmental Protection Act 1994 EPBC Act Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 FSL Full Supply Level ha Hectare GED General Environmental Duty kg Kilogram km Kilometre m Metre mm Millimetre ML Mega Litre MNES Matters of National Environmental Significance NC Act Nature Conservation Act 1992 NC Reg Nature Conservation (Wildlife) Regulation 2006 Q Quarter RL Reduced Level GHD | Report for Sunwater - Turtle Construction SMP, 41-29978-02-AP-RPT-0008 | i Abbreviation / acronym Definition SM Species Management SMP Species Management Program GHD | Report for Sunwater - Turtle Construction SMP, 41-29978-02-AP-RPT-0008 | ii Table of contents 1. Introduction ...............................................................................................................................1 1.1 Overview .........................................................................................................................1 1.2 Project description ...........................................................................................................3 1.3 Purpose of the report ..................................................................................................... 11 1.4 Legislative requirements ................................................................................................ 12 1.5 Consultation .................................................................................................................. 17 1.6 Limitations ..................................................................................................................... 17 2. Existing values ........................................................................................................................ 19 2.1 Survey methodology ...................................................................................................... 19 2.2 Fitzroy River turtle ......................................................................................................... 22 2.3 White throated snapping turtle ....................................................................................... 26 2.4 Summary of existing values ........................................................................................... 28 3. Impact assessment ................................................................................................................. 29 3.1 Overview of impacts ...................................................................................................... 29 3.2 Mortality of eggs ............................................................................................................ 31 3.3 Disturbance of nesting ................................................................................................... 31 3.4 Degradation of confirmed and potentially suitable nesting habitat................................... 32 3.5 Injury/mortality of turtles................................................................................................. 32 3.6 Loss and disturbance of habitat ..................................................................................... 32 3.7 Degradation of habitat ................................................................................................... 33 3.8 Restriction of movement ................................................................................................ 33 4. Management plan ................................................................................................................... 34 4.1 Objectives and performance criteria............................................................................... 34 4.2 Responsible persons ..................................................................................................... 36 4.3 Management strategy .................................................................................................... 38 5. Monitoring ............................................................................................................................... 54 6. Contingency planning .............................................................................................................. 55 8. Reporting requirements ........................................................................................................... 57 9. Residual risk assessment ........................................................................................................ 59 10. References ............................................................................................................................. 63 Table index Table 1-1 Rookwood Weir construction staging ............................................................................... 5 Table 1-2 Riverslea Crossing bridge construction staging ................................................................ 9 Table 1-3 Compliance with legislative requirements ...................................................................... 14 GHD | Report for Sunwater - Turtle Construction SMP, 41-29978-02-AP-RPT-0008 | iii Table 3-1 Summary of potential impacts to the Fitzroy River turtle and white-throated snapping turtle during construction ................................................................................ 30 Table 4-1 Management objectives and performance criteria .......................................................... 34 Table 4-2 Relevant conservation advice, recovery plans and threat abatement plans, and relationships to manage objectives. ............................................................................... 35 Table 4-3 Roles and responsibilities of personnel associated with the Project ................................ 36 Table 4-4 Management strategy for protection of confirmed and potentially suitable breeding places ............................................................................................................. 39 Table 4-5 Management strategy for protection of turtles and aquatic habitat .................................. 46 Table 6-1 Turtle incident contingency actions ................................................................................ 55 Table 9-1 Consequence classification ........................................................................................... 59 Table 9-2 Likelihood classification ................................................................................................. 59 Table 9-3 Risk rating matrix........................................................................................................... 60 Table 9-4 Risk assessment and management ............................................................................... 61 Figure index Figure 1-1 Rookwood Weir construction footprint and turtle habitat areas ......................................... 4 Figure 1-2 Riverslea Crossing bridge construction footprint and turtle habitat areas .......................... 8 Figure 4-1 No access turtle habitat protection areas at Rookwood Weir .......................................... 52 Figure 4-2 No access turtle habitat protection areas at Riverslea Crossing ..................................... 53 Appendices Appendix A - Curriculum vitae GHD | Report for Sunwater - Turtle Construction SMP, 41-29978-02-AP-RPT-0008 | iv 1. Introduction 1.1 Overview The Fitzroy River turtle (Rheodytes leukops) and white-throated snapping turtle (Elseya albagula) are two freshwater turtle species known to occur within the footprint of the Rookwood Weir Project (Stage 1) (Project). The Fitzroy River turtle is listed as vulnerable under the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) and the Queensland Nature Conservation Act 1992 (NC Act). The white-throated snapping turtle is listed as critically endangered under the EPBC Act and endangered under the NC Act. As a component of the Lower Fitzroy River Infrastructure Project (LFRIP; GHD 2009), Rookwood Weir (Stage 1 only) will be constructed by Sunwater Limited, to satisfy short-to- medium-term water supply. No raising of Eden Bann Weir is proposed. The proposed weir infrastructure will span 210 metres (m) across the river and have an approximate fixed crest of reduced level (RL) 45.5 m Australian Height Datum (AHD). Located at 265.3 kilometres (km) adopted middle threat distance (AMTD) on the Fitzroy River, the impoundment at full supply level (FSL) extends up the Fitzroy River and into the Mackenzie River (322 km AMTD) and Dawson River (10 km AMTD). Rookwood Weir Stage 1 also includes construction of a new multi-span bridge to replace the existing low-level causeway at Riverslea Crossing (276 km AMTD). An environmental impact statement (EIS), including an addendum (AEIS) was approved by the Queensland Government’s Coordinator General (CoG) in December 2016 (CoG 2016) and the Federal Minister for Environment in February 2017 (EPBC 2009/5173), subject to conditions.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Competing Generic Concepts for Blanding's, Pacific and European
    Zootaxa 2791: 41–53 (2011) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2011 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Competing generic concepts for Blanding’s, Pacific and European pond turtles (Emydoidea, Actinemys and Emys)—Which is best? UWE FRITZ1,3, CHRISTIAN SCHMIDT1 & CARL H. ERNST2 1Museum of Zoology, Senckenberg Dresden, A. B. Meyer Building, D-01109 Dresden, Germany 2Division of Amphibians and Reptiles, MRC 162, Smithsonian Institution, P.O. Box 37012, Washington, D.C. 20013-7012, USA 3Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract We review competing taxonomic classifications and hypotheses for the phylogeny of emydine turtles. The formerly rec- ognized genus Clemmys sensu lato clearly is paraphyletic. Two of its former species, now Glyptemys insculpta and G. muhlenbergii, constitute a well-supported basal clade within the Emydinae. However, the phylogenetic position of the oth- er two species traditionally placed in Clemmys remains controversial. Mitochondrial data suggest a clade embracing Actinemys (formerly Clemmys) marmorata, Emydoidea and Emys and as its sister either another clade (Clemmys guttata + Terrapene) or Terrapene alone. In contrast, nuclear genomic data yield conflicting results, depending on which genes are used. Either Clemmys guttata is revealed as sister to ((Emydoidea + Emys) + Actinemys) + Terrapene or Clemmys gut- tata is sister to Actinemys marmorata and these two species together are the sister group of (Emydoidea + Emys); Terra- pene appears then as sister to (Actinemys marmorata + Clemmys guttata) + (Emydoidea + Emys). The contradictory branching patterns depending from the selected loci are suggestive of lineage sorting problems. Ignoring the unclear phy- logenetic position of Actinemys marmorata, one recently proposed classification scheme placed Actinemys marmorata, Emydoidea blandingii, Emys orbicularis, and Emys trinacris in one genus (Emys), while another classification scheme treats Actinemys, Emydoidea, and Emys as distinct genera.
    [Show full text]
  • Geographic Variation in the Matamata Turtle, Chelus Fimbriatus, with Observations on Its Shell Morphology and Morphometry
    n*entilkilt ilil Biok,gr', 1995. l(-l):19: 1995 by CheloninD Research Foundltion Geographic Variation in the Matamata Turtle, Chelus fimbriatus, with Observations on its Shell Morphology and Morphometry MlncBLo R. SANcnnz-Vu,urcnAr, PnrER C.H. PnrrcHARD:, ArrnEro P.rorrLLo-r, aNn Onan J. LINlnBs3 tDepartment of Biological Anthropolog-,- and Anatomy, Duke lJniversin' Medical Cetter. Box 3170, Dtu'hcun, North Carolina277l0 USA IFat 919-684-8034]; 2Florida Audubotr Societ-t, 460 High,n;a,- 436, Suite 200, Casselberry, Florida 32707 USA: iDepartanento de Esttdios Anbientales, llniyersitlad Sinzrin Bolltnt", Caracas ]O80-A, APDO 89OOO l/enerte\a Ansrucr. - A sample of 126 specimens of Chelusftmbriatus was examined for geographic variation and morphology of the shell. A high degree of variation was found in the plastral formula and in the shape and size of the intergular scute. This study suggests that the Amazon population of matamatas is different from the Orinoco population in the following characters: shape ofthe carapace, plastral pigmentation, and coloration on the underside of the neck. Additionatly, a preliminary analysis indicates that the two populations could be separated on the basis of the allometric growth of the carapace in relation to the plastron. Kry Wonus. - Reptilia; Testudinesl Chelidae; Chelus fimbriatus; turtle; geographic variationl allometryl sexual dimorphism; morphology; morphometryl osteology; South America 'Ihe matamata turtle (Chelus fimbricttus) inhabits the scute morpholo..ey. Measured characters (in all cases straight- Amazon, Oyapoque. Essequibo. and Orinoco river systems line) were: maximum carapace len.-uth (CL). cArapace width of northern South America (Iverson. 1986). Despite a mod- at the ler,'el of the sixth marginal scute (CW).
    [Show full text]
  • Queensland Public Boat Ramps
    Queensland public boat ramps Ramp Location Ramp Location Atherton shire Brisbane city (cont.) Tinaroo (Church Street) Tinaroo Falls Dam Shorncliffe (Jetty Street) Cabbage Tree Creek Boat Harbour—north bank Balonne shire Shorncliffe (Sinbad Street) Cabbage Tree Creek Boat Harbour—north bank St George (Bowen Street) Jack Taylor Weir Shorncliffe (Yundah Street) Cabbage Tree Creek Boat Harbour—north bank Banana shire Wynnum (Glenora Street) Wynnum Creek—north bank Baralaba Weir Dawson River Broadsound shire Callide Dam Biloela—Calvale Road (lower ramp) Carmilla Beach (Carmilla Creek Road) Carmilla Creek—south bank, mouth of creek Callide Dam Biloela—Calvale Road (upper ramp) Clairview Beach (Colonial Drive) Clairview Beach Moura Dawson River—8 km west of Moura St Lawrence (Howards Road– Waverley Creek) Bund Creek—north bank Lake Victoria Callide Creek Bundaberg city Theodore Dawson River Bundaberg (Kirby’s Wall) Burnett River—south bank (5 km east of Bundaberg) Beaudesert shire Bundaberg (Queen Street) Burnett River—north bank (downstream) Logan River (Henderson Street– Henderson Reserve) Logan Reserve Bundaberg (Queen Street) Burnett River—north bank (upstream) Biggenden shire Burdekin shire Paradise Dam–Main Dam 500 m upstream from visitors centre Barramundi Creek (Morris Creek Road) via Hodel Road Boonah shire Cromarty Creek (Boat Ramp Road) via Giru (off the Haughton River) Groper Creek settlement Maroon Dam HG Slatter Park (Hinkson Esplanade) downstream from jetty Moogerah Dam AG Muller Park Groper Creek settlement Bowen shire (Hinkson
    [Show full text]
  • Submission DR130
    To: Commissioner Dr Jane Doolan, Associate Commissioner Drew Collins Productivity Commission National Water Reform 2020 Submission by John F Kell BE (SYD), M App Sc (UNSW), MIEAust, MICE Date: 25 March 2021 Revision: 3 Summary of Contents 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Current Situation / Problem Solution 3.0 The Solution 4.0 Dam Location 5.0 Water channel design 6.0 Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act – Section 100 7.0 Federal and State Responses 8.0 Conclusion 9.0 Acknowledgements Attachments 1 Referenced Data 2A Preliminary Design of Gravity Flow Channel Summary 2B Preliminary Design of Gravity Flow Channel Summary 3 Effectiveness of Dam Size Design Units L litres KL kilolitres ML Megalitres GL Gigalitres (Sydney Harbour ~ 500GL) GL/a Gigalitres / annum RL Relative Level - above sea level (m) m metre TEL Townsville Enterprise Limited SMEC Snowy Mountains Engineering Corporation MDBA Murray Darling Basin Authority 1.0 Introduction This submission is to present a practical solution to restore balance in the Murray Daring Basin (MDB) with a significant regular inflow of water from the Burdekin and Herbert Rivers in Queensland. My background is civil/structural engineering (BE Sydney Uni - 1973). As a fresh graduate, I worked in South Africa and UK for ~6 years, including a stint with a water consulting practice in Johannesburg, including relieving Mafeking as a site engineer on a water canal project. Attained the MICE (UK) in Manchester in 1979. In 1980 returning to Sydney, I joined Connell Wagner (now Aurecon), designing large scale industrial projects. Since 1990, I have headed a manufacturing company in the specialised field of investment casting (www.hycast.com.au) at Smithfield, NSW.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Lockyer Valley Water Supply Scheme Annual Network Service Plan
    Lower Lockyer Valley Water Supply Scheme Annual Network Service Plan December 2013 Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 3 2. Scheme Details ...................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Scheme background and context ............................................................................................ 3 2.2 Infrastructure details ................................................................................................................ 3 2.3 Customers and water entitlements serviced ........................................................................... 4 2.4 Water availability and use ........................................................................................................ 4 2.5 Water trading ........................................................................................................................... 5 2.6 Irrigation Customer Consultation ............................................................................................. 5 2.7 Customer service standards .................................................................................................... 6 3. Financial Performance .......................................................................................................... 6 3.1 Tariffs ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Demographic Consequences of Superabundance in Krefft's River
    i The comparative ecology of Krefft’s River Turtle Emydura krefftii in Tropical North Queensland. By Dane F. Trembath B.Sc. (Zoology) Applied Ecology Research Group University of Canberra ACT, 2601 Australia A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Masters of Applied Science (Resource Management). August 2005. ii Abstract An ecological study was undertaken on four populations of Krefft’s River Turtle Emydura krefftii inhabiting the Townsville Area of Tropical North Queensland. Two sites were located in the Ross River, which runs through the urban areas of Townsville, and two sites were in rural areas at Alligator Creek and Stuart Creek (known as the Townsville Creeks). Earlier studies of the populations in Ross River had determined that the turtles existed at an exceptionally high density, that is, they were superabundant, and so the Townsville Creek sites were chosen as low abundance sites for comparison. The first aim of this study was to determine if there had been any demographic consequences caused by the abundance of turtle populations of the Ross River. Secondly, the project aimed to determine if the impoundments in the Ross River had affected the freshwater turtle fauna. Specifically this study aimed to determine if there were any difference between the growth, size at maturity, sexual dimorphism, size distribution, and diet of Emydura krefftii inhabiting two very different populations. A mark-recapture program estimated the turtle population sizes at between 490 and 5350 turtles per hectare. Most populations exhibited a predominant female sex-bias over the sampling period. Growth rates were rapid in juveniles but slowed once sexual maturity was attained; in males, growth basically stopped at maturity, but in females, growth continued post-maturity, although at a slower rate.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Statement Budget Paper No.3 3 Budget.Qld.Gov.Au Queensland Budget 2021–22 Budget Queensland Capital Statement Budget Paper No
    Queensland Budget Budget Queensland QUEENSLAND BUDGET 2021–22 2021 – 22 Capital Statement Statement Capital CAPITAL STATEMENT Budget Paper No. Paper Budget BUDGET PAPER NO. 3 3 Queensland Budget 2021–22 Capital Statement Budget Paper No.3 budget.qld.gov.au budget.qld.gov.au 21-050_Budget 2021-22 _A4_Core Paper_Cover.indd 5 7/6/21 3:44 pm 2021–22 Queensland Budget Papers 1. Budget Speech 2. Budget Strategy and Outlook 3. Capital Statement Service Delivery Statements Appropriation Bills Budget Highlights Regional Action Plans The budget papers are available online at budget.qld.gov.au © The State of Queensland (Queensland Treasury) 2021 Copyright This publication is protected by the Copyright Act 1968 Licence This document is licensed by the State of Queensland (Queensland Treasury) under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) International licence. In essence, you are free to copy, communicate and adapt this publication, as long as you attribute the work to the State of Queensland (Queensland Treasury). To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Attribution Content from this publication should be attributed to: © The State of Queensland (Queensland Treasury) - 2021–22 Queensland Budget Translating and interpreting assistance The Queensland Government is committed to providing accessible services to Queenslanders from all cultural and linguistic backgrounds. If you have difficulty in understanding this publication, you can contact us on telephone (07) 3035 3503 and we will arrange an interpreter to effectively communicate the report to you. Capital Statement Budget Paper No. 3 ISSN 1445-4890 (Print) ISSN 1445-4904 (Online) Queensland Budget 2021–22 Capital Statement Budget Paper No.3 21-050_Budget 2021-22 _A4_Core Paper_Cover.indd 6 7/6/21 3:44 pm Capital Statement 2021–22 State Budget 2021–22 Capital Statement Budget Paper No.
    [Show full text]
  • Mary River Environmental Values and Water Quality Objectives Basin No
    ATTACHMENT 4 Attachment 4, Item 3, Planning & Organisation Committee Agenda, 2 February 2016 Environmental Protection (Water) Policy 2009 Mary River environmental values and water quality objectives Basin No. 138, including all tributaries of the Mary River July 2010 Document Set ID: 20002123 Version: 1, Version Date: 21/12/2015 Prepared by: Water Quality & Ecosystem Health Policy Unit Department of Environment and Resource Management © State of Queensland (Department of Environment and Resource Management) 2010 This publication is available in alternative formats (including large print and audiotape) on request. Contact (07) 322 48412 or email <[email protected]> July 2010 Document Ref Number Document Set ID: 20002123 Version: 1, Version Date: 21/12/2015 Main parts of this document and what they contain • Scope of waters covered Introduction • Key terms / how to use document (section 1) • Links to WQ plan (map) • Mapping / water type information • Further contact details • Amendment provisions • Source of EVs for this document Environmental Values • Table of EVs by waterway (EVs - section 2) - aquatic ecosystem - human use • Any applicable management goals to support EVs • How to establish WQOs to protect Water Quality Objectives all selected EVs (WQOs - section 3) • WQOs in this document, for - aquatic ecosystem EV - human use EVs • List of plans, reports etc containing Ways to improve management actions relevant to the water quality waterways in this area (section 4) • Definitions of key terms including an Dictionary explanation table of all (section 5) environmental values • An accompanying map that shows Accompanying WQ Plan water types, levels of protection and (map) other information contained in this document iii Document Set ID: 20002123 Version: 1, Version Date: 21/12/2015 CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mary River Environmental Values and Water Quality Objectives (Plan)
    ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! M A R Y R I V E R , I N C L U D I N G A L L T R I B U T A R I E S O F T H E R I V E! R ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Basin 138 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 152°E 152°20'E ! 152°40'E 153°E ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! H E R V E Y B AY ! ! ! B ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Grego R ! ! ry i ! ! v u er ! ! ! ! ! ! ! r ! ! ! ! CORDALBA ! n ! ! ! ! ! WALKERS ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! e ! ! ! POINT ! Environmental Protection (Water) Policy 2009 S ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! t ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! t t ! ! ! o ! ! Users must refer to plans WQ1372 k c ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! k ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! e ! y ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! R ! r e a and WQ1402 for information on South-east Queensland Map Series ! r ! i d ! ! C v BURRUM
    [Show full text]
  • Register 2 0
    © T E R R A R I S T I K - F A C H M A G A Z I N R E G I S T E R 2 0 1 0 1 REPTILIA-Register 2010 Terrarienpraxis 85, Oktober/November, 15(5): 38–45. BIRTEL, Andreas (2010): Ein Gewächshaus für Grüne Leguane und Pan- GEHRING, Philip-Sebastian, Maciej PABIJAN, Fanomezana M. RATSOAVI- therchamäleons. – Nr. 84, August/September 2010, 15(4): 44–45. NA, Jörn KÖHLER, Konrad MEBERT & Frank GLAW (2010): Calum- BRAUN, Sandra (2010): Bau eines naturnahen Schauterrariums für ein ma tarzan. Eine neue Chamäleonart aus Madaskar braucht dringend Jemenchamäleon. – Nr. 84, August/September 2010, 15(4): 40–43. Hilfe! – Nr. 86, Dezember 2010/Januar 2011, 15(6): 60–64. FRÖMBERG, Carsten (2010): Gestaltung von Verstecken unter Nutzung GUTSCHE, Alexander (2010): Mehrere Amphibien- und Reptilienarten von Latex-Bindemittel. – Nr. 84, August/September 2010, 15(4): neu in das Washingtoner Artenschutzabkommen (CITES) aufge- 36–38. nommen. – Nr. 83, Juni/Juli 2010, 15(3): 3–8. LONGHITANO, Filip (2010): Vorteile der Rackhaltung. – Nr. 84, August/ JACHAN, Georg (2010): Pfl ege und Vermehrung der Usambara-Busch- September 2010, 15(4): 34–35. viper Atheris ceratophora. – Nr. 83, Juni/Juli 2010, 15(3): 58–68. SCHLÜTER, Uwe (2010): Ernährung nord- und westafrikanischer Wara- KOCH, André (2010): Bestialische Behandlung indonesischer Großrep- ne in der Natur und bei Terrarienhaltung. – Nr. 86, Dezember 2010/ tilien für westliche Luxusprodukte. – Nr. 86, Dezember 2010/Januar Januar 2011, 15(6): 36–45. 2011, 15(6): 3–6. SCHMIDT, Dieter (2010): Naturterrarium oder Heimtierkäfi g? – Nr. 84, KOCH, Claudia (2010): Geheimnisvolles Peru.
    [Show full text]
  • The Freshwater Crayfish (Family Parastacidae) of Queensland
    AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS Riek, E. F., 1951. The freshwater crayfish (family Parastacidae) of Queensland. Records of the Australian Museum 22(4): 368–388. [30 June 1951]. doi:10.3853/j.0067-1975.22.1951.615 ISSN 0067-1975 Published by the Australian Museum, Sydney nature culture discover Australian Museum science is freely accessible online at http://publications.australianmuseum.net.au 6 College Street, Sydney NSW 2010, Australia 11ft! FRESHWATER CRAYFISH (FAMILY PARASTACIDAE) OF QUEENSLAND WITH AN ApPENDIX DESORIBING OTHlm AV5'lHALIAN SPEClEf'. By E. F. HIEK. (;ommonwealth Scientific and Industrial l~csearch Organization - Divhdon of Entomology, Canberra, A.C.T. (Figures 1-13.) Freshwater crayfish occur in almost every body of fresh water from artificial damfl and natural billabongs (I>tanding water) to headwater creeks and large rivers (flowing water). Generally the species are of considerable size and therefore easily collected, but even so many of the larger forms are unknown scientifically. This paper deals with all the species that have been collected from Queensland. It also includes a few species from New South Wales and other States. No doubt additional species will be found and some of the mOre variable series, at present included under the one specific namc, will be further subdivided. From Queensland nine species are described as new, making a total of seventeen species (of three genera) recorded from that State. The type localities of all but two of these species are in Queensland but some are not restricted to the State. Clark's 1936 and subsequent papers have been used as the basis for further taxonomic studies of the Australian freshwater crayfish.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Evolutionary History of the Australian Freshwater Turtles Chelodina Expansa and Chelodina Longicollis
    Recent evolutionary history of the Australian freshwater turtles Chelodina expansa and Chelodina longicollis. by Kate Meredith Hodges B.Sc. (Hons) ANU, 2004 A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Biological Sciences Department of Genetics and Evolution The University of Adelaide December, 2015 Kate Hodges with Chelodina (Macrochelodina) expansa from upper River Murray. Photo by David Thorpe, Border Mail. i Declaration I certify that this work contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference has been made in the text. In addition, I certify that no part of this work will, in the future, be used in a submission for any other degree or diploma in any university or other tertiary institution without the prior approval of the University of Adelaide and where applicable, any partner institution responsible for the joint-award of this degree. I give consent to this copy of my thesis when deposited in the University Library, being made available for loan and photocopying, subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. The author acknowledges that copyright of published works contained within this thesis resides with the copyright holder(s) of those works. I also give permission for the digital version of my thesis to be made available on the web, via the University’s digital research repository, the Library catalogue and also through web search engines, unless permission has been granted by the University to restrict access for a period of time.
    [Show full text]