STATE OF CALIFORNIA Budget Change Proposal - Cover Sheet DF-46(REV 07/17)

Fiscal Year Business Unit Department Priority No. 2018-19 5225 Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation 18

Budget Request Name Program Subprogram 5225-182-BCP-2018-GB 4595 - Rehabilitative Programs - 4595010 - Inmate Activities Adult Inmate Activities Canteen

Budget Request Description Innovative Programming Grants

Budget Request Summary The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation requests $4 million Inmate Welfare Fund in 2018-19 and ongoing for Innovative Programming Grants to non-profit agencies to provide rehabilitative services to offenders within institutions.

Requires Legislation Code Section(s) to be Added/Amended/Repealed • Yes Kl No

Does this BCP contain information technology (IT) Department CIO Date components? • Yes ^ No If yes, departmental Chief Information Officer must sign.

For IT requests, specify the project number, the most recent project approval document (FSR, SPR, S1BA, S2AA, S3SD, S4PRA), and the approval date. Project No. Project Approval Document: Approval Date:

If proposal affects another department, does other department concur with proposal? • Yes • No Attach comments of affected department, signed and dated by the department director or designee.

Prepared By Date Reviewed By Date

Department Director Date Agency Secretary Date Brant R. Choate, Ed.D. Scott Kern an Department of Finance Use Only

Additional Review: • Capital Outlay • ITCU • FSCU • OSAE • CALSTARS • Dept. of Technology

PPBA Original Signed By: Date submi :ted to the Legislature

Madelynn McClaIn I BCP Fiscal Detail Sheet BCP Title: Innovative Programming Grants BR Name: 5225-182-BCP-2018-GB

Budget Request Summary FY18 CY BY BY+1 BY+2 BY+3 BY+4

Operating Expenses and Equipment 5340 - Consulting and Professional Services 0 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 External Total Operating Expenses and Equipment $0 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 Total Budget Request $0 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 Fund Summary Fund Source - State Operations 0917 - Inmate Welfare Fund 0 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 Total State Operations Expenditures $0 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 Total All Funds $0 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000

Program Summary Program Funding 4595010 - Inmate Activities - Canteen 0 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 Total All Programs $0 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Budget Change Proposal - Cover Sheet DF-46 (REV 07/17)

A. Budget Request Summary The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) requests $4 million Inmate Welfare Fund (IWF) in 2018-19 and annually thereafter, for Innovative Programming Grants to non• profit agencies to provide rehabilitative services to offenders within CDCR institutions.

B. Background/History

General Background Pursuant to the Public Safety and Rehabilitation Act of 2016 (Proposition 57), CDCR revised departmental guidelines to increase the number of credits offenders can earn for good behavior and program participation. The proposed regulations were drafted to do the following: 1. Simplify and expand credit-earning opportunities for good conduct and completion of approved in-prison programs and activities; and, 2. Recognize the significant educational achievements of inmates by awarding credits to those who receive high school diplomas, GEDs, or higher education degrees. These past and previous efforts help guide CDCR and Division of Rehabilitative Programming (DRP) goals to allow offenders to participate in positive programming. The Inmate Welfare Fund is appropriated for educational, recreational, and other purposes as described within the Penal Code language below. Penal Code section 5006, subdivision (a) contains the following: "The money in the fund shall be used solely for the benefit and welfare of inmates of prisons and institutions under the jurisdiction of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, including the following: (A) The establishment, maintenance, employment of personnel for, and purchase of items for sale to inmates at canteens maintained at the state institutions. (B) The establishment, maintenance, employment of personnel, and necessary expenses in connection with the operation of the hobby shops at institutions under the jurisdiction of the department. (C) Educational programs, hobby and recreational programs, which may include physical education activities and hobby craft classes, inmate family visiting services, leisure-time activities, and assistance with obtaining photo identification from the Department of Motor Vehicles. (D) Funding for innovative programming by not-for-profit organizations offering programs that have demonstrated success and focus on offender responsibility and restorative justice principles. All funding used for this purpose shall go directly to the not-for-profit organizations and shall not be used for department staff or administration of the programming." Innovative Programminp Grants Innovative Programming grants provide not-for-profit organizations the opportunity to apply for funding to expand programs they are currently providing in other California state prisons that have demonstrated success and focus on offender responsibility and restorative justice principles. Restorative justice is a victim-centered approach to dealing with crime, the effects of crime, and crime prevention. Many institutions are underserved by volunteer and not-for-profit organizations offering innovative programming. Innovative Programming grants have historically been one-time in nature and have been awarded to expand programs that have demonstrated that they would become self-sufficient or would be funded in the long term by donations or other ongoing funding.

PAGE 11-1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Budget Change Proposal - Cover Sheet DF-46 (REV 07/17)

Grant Funding History The 2014 Budget Act included $2.5 million in one-time funding for Innovative Programming grants, of which $2.0 million was from the Inmate Welfare Fund, and $500,000 was from the Recidivism Reduction Fund. The funding was intended to increase offenders' access to innovative rehabilitative programs and expand volunteerism within adult institutions. A total of 38 programs were established from these grants, which are estimated to have served over 7,900 offenders during the grant period and beyond due to the requirement of prior sustainability. The 2015 Budget Act authorized an additional $3.0 million in one-time funding from the Recidivism Reduction Fund for additional Innovative Programming grants. These grants established an additional 44 new programs, which served over 7,300 offenders during the grant period and beyond. The 2016 Budget Act included an additional $8.5 million General Fund for Innovate Programming grants, of which $5.5 million was one-time to be used exclusively for long-term offender programming. The remaining $3.0 million was to be awarded for a three-year term, for a total of $9.0 million across three fiscal years. This term differed from the first two rounds of grants, which were awarded on a 16-month term. The grant agreement period was expanded to allow grant recipients to focus their efforts on offender responsibility and restorative justice principles, rather than on applying for additional grant funding and outside funds to meet the sustainability requirements of the grant program. Importantly, the longer-term grant awards provided stability in programming for a three-year period. Please see Attachment A, which provides a detailed history of the first three rounds of grants, including program locations, grants awarded, and the estimated number of offenders served. Grant Rating History Applications submitted in the first three rounds of grants were evaluated using criteria that addressed budgetary as well as operational issues. The main focus of the original grants was to increase volunteerism in California prisons. Eligibility was limited to individuals and not-for-profit organizations who currently offered programs in California institutions where grant recipients were required to sustain their programs after the end of the grant period with no additional State funding. The evaluation ratings reflected these requirements, and scores were given based on how closely the applicants met those criteria in their submissions of plans. These ratings included the following sections: 1. Need and Benefits of Program 2. Volunteer Resources and Sustainability 3. Program Evaluation and Outcomes 4. Implementation Plan 5. Project Management Capability, Qualifications, and Readiness to Proceed 6. Cost/Value Effectiveness and Budget Review Although additional criteria exist for the application process, this creates the framework for CDCR's current proposal through lessons learned and operational experience.

PAGE 11-2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Budget Change Proposal - Cover Sheet DF-46 (REV 07/17)

Resource History (Dollars In thousands) Program Budget FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 Authorized Expenditures N/A N/A 2,500 3,000 8,500 Actual Expenditures N/A N/A 2,500 3,000 8,500 Authorized Positions N/A 1.0 Filled Positions N/A 1.0 Vacancies N/A 0.0 Workload History Estimated Offenders Served FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 FY 17-18 Round One Grants N/A N/A 7,924 7,924 7,924 7,924 Round Two Grants N/A 7,343 7,343 7,343 Round Three Grants^ N/A 7,354 7,354 Round Three Long-Term Grants N/A 15,154 15,154 1\d Three Grants are a three-year term and the total provided in Attachment A was divided over the grant period.

C. State Level Considerations Part of CDCR's Mission is "...providing effective rehabilitation, treatment, and reintegrating offenders successfully into the community." CDCR has an obligation to prepare offenders for release back into society to improve public safety. As such, it is incumbent upon CDCR to provide an environment conducive to an offender's participation in rehabilitative programs. Following this principle has been shown to contribute to reducing recidivism, ultimately affecting State and local criminal justice costs.

D. Justification Proposed Program CDCR requests funding to continue the grant programs and increase CDCR's rehabilitative efforts across all institutions. The requested resources will improve access to rehabilitative programming, treatment, and services; increase the percentage of offenders served; and assist offenders with successful reintegration into the community. . The ongoing funding will allow CDCR to create incentives for individuals and not-for-profit organizations to expand programming throughout the Department. The additional grants funded through this proposal may also be eligible for Rehabilitative Achievement Credits in accordance with Proposition 57, which may further reduce time served. DRP requests to establish two levels of grant awards: 1. Promising Practice Grants (tentatively 65% of authorized funding/grant awards) 2. Practice-Based Grants (tentatively 35% of authorized funding/grant awards) Establishing grants in this manner will allow DRP to prioritize grants for programs with promising practices, while providing DRP flexibility to fund programs that appear to have a positive impact on the offender population at the operational level, but may not have the necessary focus or experience with incorporating promising practices into their programs.

PAGE 11-3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Budget Change Proposal Cover Sheet DF-46 (REV 07/17)

Proposed Application and Evaluation Process The proposed process for grant application and evaluation will be similar to the previous rounds, but will contain the two levels of grant awards. The criteria for application and evaluation will also be similar to earlier rounds, but will now incorporate known factors of effective programming. CDCR proposes to utilize the University of Cincinnati Corrections Institute's Correctional Program Checklist (CPC) as the basis for developing improved and expanded application and evaluation criteria. With the assistance of Dr. Edward Latessa, Professor and Director of the School of Criminal Justice at the University of Cincinnati, DRP will use the CPC to revise application evaluation criteria to focus on those displaying promising practices. DRP will use existing resources to obtain Dr. Latessa's consultation and guidance.

The introduction of the CPC's rating criteria will distinguish programs that use promising practices from those that do not. The secondary grant awards will focus more on practice-based programming. The CPC criteria are divided into two areas: capacity and content. According to the CPC, capacity "...is designed to measure whether a correctional program has the capability to deliver evidence-based interventions and services for offenders." The CPC criteria are used to evaluate the extent to which a program addresses risk, need, responsivity and treatment. The CPC criteria are applicable to a wide range of programs and are correlated with reduced recidivism. Evaluation scores will be weighted to give preference to applications with programs using promising practices. While this proposal does not intend to limit grant eligibility to evidence-based programs, giving preference to higher standards should increase the overall effectiveness of programming. Applications without promising practice programs will be considered in the Practice Based category of grant awards. Additionally, DRP will structure the grants to ensure no individual award receives more than a specified percentage of total awards given. DRP will develop all specific monetary award limitations in the 2018-19 fiscal year. The proposed grants will provide funding over a three-year period, similar to the 2016 round of grants. This allows programs sufficient time to become fully established and support long-term sustainability without placing time constraints on the grantees. Additionally, the longer grant period benefits offenders and institutions by ensuring continuity of programs for a sustained period. Modified Eligibilitv Criteria The current Innovative Programming grants have strengthened CDCR's formal partnerships with community stakeholders; ongoing funding will significantly reinforce those partnerships. As stated above, prior grant rounds limited eligibility to applicants currently providing programs within CDCR institutions. This proposal will revise the eligibility criteria to include individuals and not-for-profit organizations that have provided programs within a correctional setting. This change will broaden the applicant pool by allowing organizations that have not provided programming in CDCR institutions to participate in the grant application process. This modification will not only increase the opportunity for varied programming within CDCR's adult institutions, but could also introduce new and innovative ideas working in other correctional settings. Finally, this proposal will eliminate the previous requirement of sustainability. No applicant will be required to sustain their program as a requirement of receiving a grant. However, applicants who have previously sustained a program or whose current application provides for a long-term sustainable model will be eligible to receive additional points during the grading. Support The first three rounds of grant have produced positive feedback from offenders, stakeholders, and CDCR operational staff, including custodial staff. The single greatest response to the grants has been that more are needed. Many institutions are underserved by organizations that provide innovative programming, resulting in limited rehabilitative opportunities for offenders. Although rehabilitative programming has significantly expanded in recent years, these more flexible inmate activity groups improve the incarceration experience and successful community reentry.

PAGE 11-4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Budget Change Proposal - Cover Sheet DF-46 (REV 07/17)

In addition to expanding rehabilitative opportunities, this proposal will improve the existing grant program by providing ongoing funding, awarding grants for three-year periods, expanding grant eligibility criteria, removing the sustainability requirement, and modifying application evaluation criteria to include recognized characteristics of promising correctional programs. Current Grant Programs There are over 190 additional programs operating in CDCR's adult institutions as a result of the current grants. The programs allow offenders to participate in various rehabilitative experiences that can better prepare them for release and improve the likelihood of a successful and more productive incarceration. The following are two of the many programs that have won wide acclaim for their work with CDCR offenders: 1. The Last Mile is a current grant recipient that has consistently provided effective rehabilitative programs within CDCR institutions. The organization provides offenders with business and technology training, with a focus on computer coding in JavaScript, HTML, CSS, and Python. While acquiring these highly technical skills, the offenders in the Last Mile program also learn de-escalation skills and how to communicate with one another. An April 2017 article^ by CNBC highlights this grant program's effectiveness and promising practices. 2. Karma Rescue is another current grant recipient. In this dog rescue program, offenders are responsible for the care and training of rescue dogs, after which the dogs are eligible for adoption. There have been numerous recent news articles regarding Karma Rescue and their programs in California prisons. Time magazine wrote an article^ in February 2015 regarding the effectiveness of the program. Recently, the Orange County Register^ reported in September 2017 that Karma Rescue and California State Prison, Los Angeles County in Lancaster (LAC) was recognized for rescue efforts during Hurricane Harvey. Karma Rescue, in coordination with LAC, was able to assist in rescuing 35 dogs from this natural disaster. A Facebook video clip shows dogs rescued from Hurricane Harvey and subsequently housed at LAC". The expansion of existing and establishment of new innovative programs will continue to benefit the institutions, offenders, and ultimately public safety. These grants are both well-regarded and propose positive programming to offenders.

E. Outcomes and Accountability Projected outcomes for the proposed Innovative Programming Grants: • Similar to the prior three-year grant awards, the increase in participation and effectiveness of self- help programming could potentially reach over 30,000 participants over a three-year grant period (or approximately 10,000 offenders per year). • Innovative Programming grant participants will have additional opportunities to earn Rehabilitative Achievement Credit. • Opportunities for rehabilitative programming may positively impact an offender's willingness to participate in Cognitive Behavioral Treatment or other programming. • Potential reduction in recidivism rate.

^ https://www.cnbc.com/2017/04/10/san-quentin-inmate-codinq-proqram-the-last-mile.html 2 Time.com/3681321/doqs-in-prison/ 3 http://www.ocreqister.com/2017/09/03/harvev-leads-to-adoptions-for-texas-doqs-flown-to-oranqe-countv ^ https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php7storv fbid=478189505887908&id=100010905871018 PAGE 11-5 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Budget Change Proposal - Cover Sheet DF-46 (REV 07/17)

Projected Outcomes Workload Measure^ ^ CY BY BY+1 BY+2 BY+3 BY+4 Additional Estimated N/A 9,805 9,805 9,805 9,805 9,805 Offenders Served Additional Estimated N/A 60 60 60 60 60 Programs 1\d programs and offenders served calculated from prior innovative grant funded program actuals. 2\d programs and offenders served only associated with current proposal request.

F. Analysis of All Feasible Alternatives

Alternative 1: Provide $4.0 million per year from the IWF on an ongoing basis with the grant period beginning on March 1,2019. Pros: • Provides additional rehabilitative programs and services for a larger segment of the adult offender population; • Assists in lowering offender population through increased sentence reduction possibilities; • Provides more accessible and flexible programming to offenders; • Provides an ongoing system-wide impact on cultural change for offenders within the adult correctional system; • Provides rehabilitative programming with the professional and peer support necessary for positive, sustainable, and behavioral change; • Promotes positive behavior which has been shown to reduce violence within prisons and to reduce recidivism; • Creates a positive impact on behavior and choices during an offender's sentence; and, • No impact to the State General Fund. Cons:

• Increased difficulty in finding available programming space.

Alternative 2: Provide $4.0 million per year from the IWF for three years, limited term; $12.0 million total. Grant funds will be available on a one-time basis, for the grant period beginning on March 1, 2019, and extended for three fiscal years. Pros; • Provides additional rehabilitative programs and services for a larger segment of the adult offender population; • Reduced long-term fiscal impact; • Assists in lowering the offender population by increasing sentence reduction possibilities; • Provides more accessible and flexible programming to offenders;

PAGE 11-6 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Budget Change Proposal - Cover Sheet DF-46 (REV 07/17)

• Provides rehabilitative programming with the professional and peer support necessary for positive, sustainable, and behavioral change; • Promotes positive behavior which has been shown to reduce violence within prisons and to reduce recidivism; • Creates a positive impact on behavior and choices during an offender's sentence; and. No impact to the State General Fund. Cons: Not a durable solution, reduced program enrollment and participation over time; and. Increased difficulty in finding available programming space.

Alternative 3: Provide $3.0 million from the IWF per year on an ongoing basis with the grant period beginning on March 1,2019.

Pros: Provides additional rehabilitative programs and services for a larger segment of the adult offender population; Assists in lowering the inmate population through increased sentence reduction possibilities; Provides more accessible and flexible programming to offenders; Provides rehabilitative programming with the professional and peer support necessary for positive, sustainable behavioral change; Promotes positive behavior which has been shown to reduce violence within prisons and to reduce recidivism; Creates a positive impact on behavior and choices during an offender's sentence; and. No impact to the State General Fund. Cons: Reduced impact on system-wide grants, participation, and enrollment; and. Reduced impact because of a reduced number of grants or grant awards; and. Increased difficulty in finding available programming space.

Alternative 4: Provide $3.0 million per year from the IWF, for three years; $9.0 million total. Grant funds will be available on a one-time basis, for the grant period beginning on March 1, 2019. Pros: • Provides additional rehabilitative programs and services for a larger segment of the adult offender population; • Assists in lowering the inmate population through increased sentence reduction possibilities; • Provides more accessible and flexible programming to offenders;

PAGE 11-7 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Budget Change Proposal - Cover Sheet DF-46 (REV 07/17)

• Provides rehabilitative programming with the professional and peer support necessary for positive, sustainable behavioral change; • Promotes positive behavior which has been shown to reduce violence within prisons and to reduce recidivism; and, • Creates a positive impact on behavior and choices during an offender's sentence; and, • No impact to the State General Fund. Cons: • Reduced impact on system-wide grants, participation, and enrollment; • Reduced impact because of a reduced number of grants or grant awards; and. Increased difficulty in finding available programming space.

G. Implementation Plan The proposed roll-out of the Request for Application process may occur in January 1, 2019.

H. Supplemental Information Attachment A - Innovative Grant Summary

I. Recommendation CDCR supports approval of Alternative 1. Provide $4.0 million per year from the IWF on an ongoing basis with the grant period beginning on March 1, 2019.

PAGE 11-8 DIVISION OF REHABILITATIVE PROGRAMS Attachment GRANT SUMMARY

Round One Grants Round Two Grants Round Three Grant Awards Institution b • Est. Offenders Train Ing-for- . Est. Offenders Train! ng-for- Innovative Programming Est. Offenders Train! ng-for- • Est. Offenders Training-for- u. Served* Trainers** Served* Trainers** (3vr. Term) Served* Trainers** Served* Trainers'*

ASP 1. International Bodhisattva Sangha 25 3 1. The Actors' Gang Prison Project 25 1. Insight Garden Program 450 1. GOGI (In Ceil Anger Management) 300 ASP 2. GRIP 25 2. Center for Council 20 2. Project Avary 120 2. GRIP 150 ASP 3. Freedom Through Ed Campus 400 CAC 1. Defv Ventures, inc. 115 1. Center for Council 330 California City Correctional Center CAC 2. The Place4Grace 400 2. GOGI (Peer Mentor) 300 CAC 3. Catalyst Foundation 125 CCC 1. Root & Rebound 900 California Correctional Center CCC 2. Get on the Bus Program 240 CCI 1. GOGMInCell} 200 1. Center for Council 20 1. Catalyst Foundation 1500 1. GOGI (In Cell Anger Management) 300 California Correctional Institution CCI 2. GOGI (Spanish In Cell) 100 2, The Place4Grace 400 CCI 3. The Lionheart Foundation 150

CHCF 1. International Bodhisattva Sangha 25 3 1. Insight Garden Program 125 1. Center for Council 110 1. GOGI (In Cell Anger Management) 300 California Health Care Facility CHCF 2. Canine Comp for Independence 8 1 2, Yard time Literary Program 60 2. GOGI (Peer Mentor) 300 2. IMPACT/CARE 120 CHCF 3. Yard time Literary Program 60 CIM 1. Catalyst Foundation 250 California Institution for Men CIM 2. Moving Beyond Violence 255 CIM 3. The Place4Grace 400 CIW 1. The Last Mile 48 CIW 2. Moving Beyond Violence 255 California Institution for Women CIW 3. Freedom to Choose Foundation 200 CIW 4. The Place4Grace 400 CMF 1. IMPACT 96 12 1. Self Awareness and Recovery 140 California Medical Facility CMF 2. Insight Garden Program 125 2. The Place4Grace 400 CMF 3. Yard time Literary Program 75 CMC 1. Center for Council 20 California Men's Colony CMC 2. Prison of Peace 160 California Rehabilitation Center CRC COR 1. ARC/PUP College Program 54 1. GOGI (EOP) 100 1. Anti-Recidivism Coalition 1924 1. Center for Council 20 California State Prison Corcoran COR 2. Alternatives to Violence 900 20 2. The Lionheart Foundation (SHU) 150 2. Moving Beyond Violence 90 2. GOGI (In Cell Anger Management) 300 COR 3. Buddhist Pathways Prison Project 200 6 3. Prison of Peace 100 LAC 1. Community-Based Arts Program 960 1. Defy Ventures, inc. 300 1. Karma Rescue 99 1, Youth Law Center 280 California State Prison Los Angeles LAC 2. Insight Garden Program 125 2. Insight Garden Program 125 2. Buddhist Pathways Prison Project 600 County UC 3. Catalyst Program 125 SAC 1. IMPACT/CARE 350 1. GOGI (In Cell Anger Management) 300 California State Prison Sacramento SAC 2. The P!ace4Grace 1200 2. The Lionheart Foundation 64 SAC 3. Buddhist Pathways Prison Project 225 3. Insight Prison Project (Apology Project) 60 California State Prison Solano SOL California Substance Abuse SATF 1. Center for Council 20 1. GOGI (In Cell Anger Management) 300 Treatment Facility SATF 2. ARC/PUP College Program 54 2. Get on the Bus Program 80 CAL 1. Anti-Recidivism Coalition 54 CAL 2. The Place4Grace 400 CAL 3. Giving Life Back to Lifers 120 CAL 4. Mothers with a Message 750 CAL 5. Prison Education Project 720 CEN 1. The Old Globe - Reflecting Shakespeare 55 CEN 2. Anti-Recidivism Coalition 54 Centinela State Prison CEN 3. Giving Life Back to Lifers 120 CEN 4. Mothers with a Message 750 CCWF 1. The Actors' Gang Prison Project 30 CCWF 2. Healing Trauma 255 Central California Women's Facility CCWF 3. IMPACT/CARE 120 CCWF 4. Insight Garden Program 45 CCWF 5. Yard time Literary Program 75 CVSP 1, Alternatives to Violence 900 20 1. The Last Mile 48 1. GOGI (Peer Mentor) 300 1. Prison of Peace 160 Chuckawalla CVSP 2. The Place4Grace 400 2. Insight Prison Project (VOEG) 52 2. Community-Based Art Program 20 CVSP 3. Insight Prison Project (VOEG) 52 CTF 1. Defy Ventures, Inc. 600 CTF 2. GRIP 180 Correctional Training Facility CTF 3. Project Avary 120 CTF 4. Insight Prison Project (VOEG) 336 DVi 1. International Bodhisattva Sangha 25 3 I.GRIP 200 1. Insight Prison Project (VOEG) 336 1. Center for Council 20 Deuel Vocational Institution DVI 2. Yard time Literary Program 60 2. Veterans Healing Veterans from the 24 FSP FWF 1. The Last Mile 48 1. Marin Shakespeare Company 108 Folsom Women's Facility FWF 2. Marin Shakespeare Company 72 2. Insight Garden Program 240 FWF 3. Yard time Literary Program 2160 HDSP 1, Alternatives to Violence 900 20 1. Alternatives to Violence 264 10 1. The Place4Grace-Camp Grace 30 1. Center for Council 20

Page 1 of 2 DIVISION OF REHABILITATIVE PROGRAMS Attachment A GRANT SUMMARY

Round One Grants Round Two Grants Round Three Grant Awards Institution QC 1- Est. Offenders Training-for- Est. Offenders Tralning-for- Innovative Programming Est. Offenders Training-for- Est. Offenders Training-for- innovative Programming Innovative Programming Long-Term Inmate Programming (S5.5M) Served* Trainers** Served* Trainers** (3vr. Term) Served* Trainers** Served* Trainers** High Desert State Prison HDSP 2. The Place4Grace 400 2. Get on the Bus Program 40 2. GOGI (Peer Mentor) 300 2. GOGI (Anger Management) 2000 HDSP 3. Jesuit Restorative Justice Initiative 200 3. Buddhist Pathways Prison Project 175 6 ISP 1. The Actors' Gang Prison Proiect 360 4 1. Anti-Recidivism Coalition 54 ISP 2. The Last Mile 52 2. Prison of Peace 160 Ironwood State Prison ISP 3.ThePlace46race 400 3. Community-Based Art Program 20 ISP 4. Insight Prison Protect (VOEG) 72 4. Youth Law Center 280 KVSP 1. GOGI(ln-Cell) 200 1. The Actors' Gang Prison Project 25 1. Anti-Recidivism Coalition 1924 1. Catalyst Foundation 250 KVSP 2. The Place4Grace 400 2. The Actors' Gang Prison Project 90 2. GOGI (In Cell Anger Management) 300 KVSP MCSP 1. IMPACT 110 1, Alternatives to Violence 240 20 1. Alternatives to Violence 420 1, IMPACT/CARE 120 MCSP 2. International Bodhisattva Sangha 25 3 2. CARE Accountability Program 480 12 2. Center for Council 110 2. Lionheart Foundation 644 MCSP 3. GRIP 25 3. Karma Rescue Paws for Life Program 45 3- Tender Loving Canines Assistance Dogs 90 MCSP 4. Tender Loving Canines Assistance Dogs 15 NKSP 1. Center for Council 20 2 1. GOGI(RC) 300 1. Alternatives to Violence 420 1. GOGI (In Cell Anger Management) 300 NKSP 2. Freedom Through Education 400 2. International Bodhisattva Sangha 100 2. Marley's Mutts 288 PBSP 1. GOGI (In Cell) 200 1. Center for Council 20 1. The Place4Grace 1200 1. GOGI (In Cell Anger Management) 300 PBSP 2. Jesuit Restorative Justice Initiative 200 2. The Lionheart Foundation (SHU) 150 PBSP 3. Insight Prison Project (VOEG) 52 PVSP 1. Center for Council 20 1. Freedom Through Education Campus 400 1. Defy Ventures, Inc. 1035 1. Prison of Peace Pleasant Valley State Prison PVSP 2. GOGI 100 15 2. GOGI (Lifer) 320 2. Buddhist Pathways Prison Project 600 160 RJD 1. Anti-Recidivism Coalition 54 RJD 2. Tender Loving Canine Assistance Dogs 30 RJ Donovan Correctional Facility 3. Insight Prison Project (Spanish VOEG/Next RJD Step) S2 RJD 4. Prison Yoga Project 45 SVSP 1. Project Avary 120 1. GOGI (In Cell Anger Management) 300 Salinas Valley State Prison SVSP 2. The Place46race-Camp Grace 30 2, Operation New Hope 400 SVSP 3. The Place4Grace 1200 3. insight Prison Project (VOEG) 160 SQ Sierra Conservation Center sec VSP 1. Defy Ventures, Inc. 300 1. Center for Council 20 Valley State Prison VSP 2. The Place4Grace 400 2, GOGI (in Cell Anger Management) 300 VSP 3- InsideOUT Writers 54 3. Insight Prison Project (VOEG) 160 WSP 1. Center for Council 20 l.GOGI (RC) 100 1. Alternatives to Violence 420 WSP 2. GOGI 100 2. International Bodhisattva Sangha 125 2. Prison of Peace 380 WSP 3. Marley's Mutts 288 8,018 106 7,229 114 20,773 1,290 14,122 1,032 "Estimated number of offenders served based upon grant application period. ""Estimated number of traininq-for-trainers based upon grant application period with no designated limit/estimate for number of offenders that could be served.

Page 2 of 2