DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix D: Summary of Olympia Stream Basin Traits Data Sources

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix D: Summary of Olympia Stream Basin Traits Data Sources Appendix D: Summary of Olympia Stream Basin Traits (Source: Aquatic Habitat Evaluation and Management Study, City of Olympia, 1999) After an overview of data sources and overall basin characteristics, this appendix summarizes the available information relevant to the evaluation of aquatic habitat conditions. Data is organized based on functional relationships presented and discussed in the University of Washington research cited in the study report: Basin conditions (extent of development and hydrologic regime) Riparian conditions (integrity of the riparian corridor) Instream and wetland habitat conditions (physical habitat and water quality) Aquatic biota (fish and macro-invertebrates) This information is summarized further in Table 3.2 of the Aquatic Habitat Evaluation and Management Study report. The basins are discussed in order of the rankings described in Section 3.5 of the report. Data Sources Primary data sources consulted for this summary are: Comprehensive Drainage Basin Plans for Indian-Moxlie Creeks (1993), Percival Creek (1993), Woodard Creek (1995), Chambers/Ward/Hewitt (1995), and Green Cove Creek (1998). Basin Reconnaissance and Public Involvement Report (1993), containing information about Mission, Ellis, and Schneider Creeks. Thurston County's Water Quality Monitoring Report for the 1996-97 water year and previous similar reports. Olympia's Wildlife Habitat Study Final Recommendations (1994). Additional information on Olympia’s streams and wetlands presented in biological investigations, watershed plans and research papers. Overview of Creek Drainage Basins Olympia’s eight major drainage basins are shown in Figure 1.1 in relationship to the City limits and Urban Growth Area. Budd Inlet/Deschutes River Watershed Ellis Mission Indian-Moxlie Chambers/Ward/Hewitt Percival Schneider Henderson Inlet Watershed Woodard Eld Inlet Watershed Green Cove D-1 The following summary of basin conditions is excerpted from the Basin Reconnaissance and Public Involvement Study (Olympia 1993). Population and Land Use Thurston County has experienced a steady increase in population since 1900. Before the 1960s, the county’s average growth rate was about 20% per decade. Population has doubled since 1970. The county’s rapid growth has made it the eight most popuous county in the state despite its relatively small size. The current growth trend, spurred by expanding service, trade, and government services, is expected to continue. Growth outside the urban core has accounted for 75% of the area’s new development, most of which can be described as low density urban sprawl. In an effort to restrict sprawl, the Cities of Olympia, Lacey, and Tumwater have delineated an 84-square-mile Urban Growth Area (UGA). Within the UGA, land use policies and infrastructure are designed to encourage high density housing and commercial development; outside the UGA is intended to remain in low density rural use. The majority of the basins included in this report fall within the UGA. Climate The South Puget Sound region has a marine climate typical of the west coast. Summers are relatively dry and cool; winters are mild and wet. Average annual precipitation is about 53 inches. During the wet season, rainfall is usually of light to moderate intensity and continuous over a long period. Typical rainfall is as follows: Approximate Seasonal Rainfall (inches) Fall 10 Winter 29 Spring 10 Summer 4 Major storm events in the Olympia area have been evaluated for the purpose of characterizing stormwater runoff quantities and sizing conveyance and storage facilities. This evaluation generated theoretical design storms that are defined as the precipitation expected in a 24-hour period from a storm of a given recurrence interval. Although precipitation varies with geographic location, the 24-hour rainfall values are used for stormwater facility design throughout northern Thurston County (Drainage Design and Erosion Control Manual for the Thurston Region, 1994). Storm Recurrence Precipitation (years) (inches/24 hours) 2 2.80 5 3.75 10 4.35 25 5.10 50 5.65 100 6.15 D-2 The prolonged wet season in the Puget Sound region presents unique problems in estimating the quantity of runoff generated by a storm of specific intensity and duration. Often the level of moisture in the soil profile immediately preceding a storm event is high. Given a saturated soil, only minimal amounts of precipitation can be infiltrated. The likelihood of high antecedent moisture levels in soils requires extra care when predicting the amount of runoff that can be expected from a storm event. Topography The basins described in this report are located between the mountainous Black Hills on the west and expansive prairies on the east. These basins surround and drain to Budd Henderson, and Eld Inlets, the southernmost points of Puget Sound. Most creeks have low to medium gradients and are often fed by numerous groundwater springs. Most of the creeks have formed deeply incised banks in downstream portions of the channels. In general, land area in the basins is moderately sloped with frequent rolling terraces and occasional small glacial depressions known as kettles. In the southeastern areas, these small depressions often contain lakes, which are groundwater fed and commonly have no surface inlets or outlets. Geology and Soils The geologic history of the Olympia area plays a major role in determining the surface and subsurface drainage characteristics of the basins. Glacial ice from the north entered the South Puget Sound region at least several times. The low topography on the east side of the Olympic Peninsula routed a portion of the progressing glaciers into northern Thurston County. As the glaciers advanced and then retreated, several types of material were deposited in creek channels and lowlands. On the westside of Olympia and to the north, the glaciers left primarily till at the surface, which occurs as gravelly creekbeds providing good habitat for anadromous fish. On the eastside and to the southeast, surface soils are primarily sand associated with the Lake Russell Deposits; this material dominates creek substrate, offering lower quality anadromous fish habitat and resulting in less instream biotic diversity. The Vashon glaciation is of primary importance to local geology. This glacial event receded only 10,000 years ago, after covering the area for 2,000 years. Glacial advancement over existing landforms compacted underlying sand, silt, clay and gravel. The resulting concrete-like material known as glacial till has low permeability and therefore generates considerable stormwater runoff. The tills are fairly stable in slopes. Conversely the material deposited ahead of advancing glaciers by melting ice, known as advance outwash, is composed of highly porous sands and gravels. A second type of outwash, recessional, was formed by retreating glaciers. The outwash soils are deeper and much better drained than the till soils. Outwash materials with a high content of silt and sand are prone to erosion; those that are more sorted and contain larger material are more resistant to erosion. Another soil group, clay, formed during glacial compaction of the fine material deposited in pre- glacial lakes. Wetlands typically contain unique hydric soils. These soils are saturated, flooded, or ponded long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions that favor the growth and regeneration of specific vegetative types. D-3 Recent glacial activity also developed a unique land form in what is now the southeast portion of Olympia. Upland depressions known as kettles or potholes were formed by the deposition of materials form the receding Vashon glacier. These depressions re typically closed to surface discharge, steeply sloped, and commonly support wetland vegetation. Critical Areas Critical areas within the basins include wetlands, floodplains, aquifers, shorelines, and geologic formations. Development restrictions apply to many of these areas as delineated on local zoning maps. Wetlands. Wetlands are usually found in low-lying areas where land and water come together. These areas can occur along coastal shorelines, river and stream banks, around the shores of lakes, or in areas fed by underground springs. Wetlands are distinguished by their soil types and vegetation. In wetlands, water is present at or near the surface for extended periods of time during the growing season, thereby affecting the traits of the soils. Only plans adapted to living in these conditions can survive in wetlands. Wetlands provide a number of valuable ecological functions that commonly include water purification, flood control, shoreline stabilization, recharge of groundwater and streams, and wildlife and fish habitat. The headwaters of nearly all the streams in Olympia are located in wetlands. Many of these wetlands have been encroached upon or completely eliminated. Basins located within the highly urbanized areas of Olympia now have only small, if any wetlands remaining. Less developed basins contain larger, more extensive wetlands. Shoreline areas. The basins contain several relatively large lakes, many of which are protected by the requirements of the Shoreline Master Program for the Thurston region. Ward and Hewitt Lakes are designated as rural environments; Chambers is designated as a conservancy environment. Saltwater shorelines in Thurston County are designated as conservancy environments, except for Budd Inlet south of Priest Point Park, which is an urban environment. With the exception of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2020 Stormwater Comprehensive Plan Appendices
    APPENDIX A Detailed Stormwater Goals and Policies DETAILED STORMWATER GOALS AND POLICIES City staff developed long-term goals for each SWMP program element below. Program elements are a comprehensive list of functions performed or influenced by the SWMP. This Appendix lists policies from the previous Stormwater Comprehensive Plan developed in 2013 (SCP 2013) related to each long-term goal. Policies that apply to multiple program elements are indicated with an asterisk. Flood Reduction: There is no flooding of the public stormwater system due to large storm events. FC1. Comply with all applicable requirements from federal, state, Thurston County, and City of Lacey related to flood protection FC2. Develop new drainage projects for the CIP plan to address flooding problems when these problems cannot be addressed through maintenance of the existing infrastructure FC3. Continue to encourage and allow the use of LID stormwater Best Management Practices for flow control for new development and redevelopment in accordance with current regulations * FC4. Provide adequate stormwater conveyance in the public storm drain system as follows: Accommodate the 10-year 24-hour event from existing development within the public storm drain system, except as noted in the three bullets below Accommodate the 25-year 24-hour event from existing development for storm drains and culverts that pass under public roads Accommodate the 25-year 24-hour event from existing development within the long term UGA boundary public right-of-way without having water over more than 50 percent of the driving lane Accommodate the 100-year 24-hour event from existing development for culverts and bridges that convey natural channels Surface Water Quality Improvement: All surface water bodies in Lacey meet water quality criteria for designated recreation and fish uses.
    [Show full text]
  • On-Site Sewage System Management Plan January 7, 2008
    Thurston County Public Health and Social Services Department Environmental Health Division On-Site Sewage System Management Plan January 7, 2008 Thurston County On-site Sewage System Management Plan January 7, 2008 Table of Contents: Section Page Acknowledgements 3 Executive Summary 4 On-site Sewage System Management Plan 8 Part I – Database Enhancement 10 Part 2 – Identification of Sensitive Areas 16 Part 3 – Operation, Monitoring and Maintenance in Sensitive Areas 28 Part 4 – Marine Recovery and Sensitive Area Strategy 34 Part 5 – Education 39 Part 6 – Plan Summary 42 Appendices A – Amanda Reports 53 B – Henderson Watershed Protection Area Description 58 C – Process for Evaluation of Potential MRA’s and LMA’s 62 D – Marine Recovery Area and Local Management Area Designation Tool 63 E – Measurable Outcomes 70 F – Thurston County Septic Park 71 Page 2 of 71 Thurston County On-site Sewage System Management Plan January 7, 2008 Acknowledgements Thurston County Public Health and Social Services would like to acknowledge all those who have been instrumental in our process to develop our Local Management Plan (LMA). First of all we appreciate the contributions of the Article IV Advisory Committee in assisting the Environmental Health Division. Your dedication to providing direction and tone for the LMA has been invaluable. We would also like to recognize the Environmental Health, Development Services and Geodata staff for supplying input, recommendations and attending committee meetings to offer insight into our program areas. Our appreciation is also extended to the Washington State Department of Health. We are grateful for their staff support and funding. We especially appreciate the use of the guidance document, which has provided section descriptions and format for our plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishway Ladder
    FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS A. Fishway B. Riverwalk C. DNR Compliance with NR 333 D. Dam Removal E. Property Issues F. Fish and Aquatic Life G. Wildlife H. Recreational Use A. Fishway 1. What is the estimated cost to build a fishway at Bridge Street dam? The engineering consultant, Bonestroo, has estimated the cost at $1.3 million per the NOAA grant. 2. If the fishway is constructed next year, will it have to be rebuilt when the dam needs to be removed and replaced? Essentially no. Most of the fishway is a separate upstream structure and will not be impacted by demolition and construction of a new dam. The fishway entrance area may need to be modified if a new dam is installed or if the dam abutments are altered. 3. Why is the fishway being constructed on the west bank of the river? The west bank allows land owned by the Village of Grafton to be used for a portion of the channel alignment. Furthermore, the heaviest construction will likely be in the area currently owned by the Village (penetration of the west dam abutment). Other advantages include the appeal to tourists able to view fish entering and ascending the fishway from the riverwalk, and the known presence of shallow bedrock helping assure good foundation characteristics. Furthermore, the historic mill race crosses the area, and a portion of the mill race alignment may assist with fishway construction. 4. How long will it take to complete the construction of the fishway? The fishway will be completed by late fall of 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Passage Engineering Design Criteria 2019
    FISH PASSAGE ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA 2019 37.2’ U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Northeast Region June 2019 Fish and Aquatic Conservation, Fish Passage Engineering Ecological Services, Conservation Planning Assistance United States Fish and Wildlife Service Region 5 FISH PASSAGE ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA June 2019 This manual replaces all previous editions of the Fish Passage Engineering Design Criteria issued by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 5 Suggested citation: USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). 2019. Fish Passage Engineering Design Criteria. USFWS, Northeast Region R5, Hadley, Massachusetts. USFWS R5 Fish Passage Engineering Design Criteria June 2019 USFWS R5 Fish Passage Engineering Design Criteria June 2019 Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................................ ix List of Tables .................................................................................................................................. x List of Equations ............................................................................................................................ xi List of Appendices ........................................................................................................................ xii 1 Scope of this Document ....................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Role of the USFWS Region 5 Fish Passage Engineering ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Passage Profiles Evaluation Report
    Potter Valley Project Ad Hoc Committee Fish Passage Profiles Evaluation Report December 2019 Developed by the Fish Passage Working Group Fish Passage Working Group Report Contributors Scenarios and Options Subgroup Scoring Subgroup Craig Addley (Consultant to PG&E) Craig Addley (Consultant to PG&E) Joshua Fuller (NMFS) Joshua Fuller (NMFS) Paul Kubicek (PG&E) Damon Goodman (USFWS) Jon Mann (CDFW) Paul Kubicek (PG&E) David Manning (Sonoma Water) Jon Mann (CDFW) Scott McBain (Consultant to RVIT) David Manning (Sonoma Water) Darren Mierau (CalTrout) Scott McBain (Consultant to RVIT) Steve Thomas (NMFS) Darren Mierau (CalTrout) Allen Renger (CDFW) Steve Thomas (NMFS) Larry Wise (PG&E) The scenarios subgroup developed the conceptual passage scenarios and options. The scoring subgroup developed and used a passage scoring matrix to evaluate the passage options. Facilitation Team Facilitators Gina Bartlett and Stephanie Horii of Consensus Building Institute assisted the subgroups to document the process and compile results into this final report. 2 Executive Summary Background and Purpose The Potter Valley Project on the Eel River is a set of hydroelectric facilities that includes two large dams (Scott and Cape Horn), water-diversion facilities, and a powerhouse. The project involves an inter-basin transfer that stores winter runoff from the upper Eel River and diverts much of that water to the Russian River to generate hydroelectric power and meet contract water demands. Scott Dam, which creates Lake Pillsbury, is a complete barrier to native fish species, preventing access to high value habitat for federally Endangered Species Act (ESA)-listed anadromous salmonids. To balance diverse Potter Valley Project interests, Congressman Jared Huffman established an Ad Hoc Committee comprised of representative stakeholder groups across four counties, who have agreed to work collaboratively towards a two-basin solution.
    [Show full text]
  • Open House Summary Report
    Nimbus Hatchery Fish Passage Project Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Report Open House Summary Report Rancho Cordova, California US Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation California Department of Fish and Game February 2011 Contents Page 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................1 1.1 Overview of the Public Involvement Process ..............................................1 1.2 Description of the Public Involvement Process to Date ..............................2 2. Meeting Overview ..................................................................................................5 3. Comment Summary ...............................................................................................7 4. Future Steps ............................................................................................................9 4.1 Summary of Future Steps and Public Participation Opportunities ..............9 4.2 Contact Information .....................................................................................9 Table Page 3-1 Summary of Comments ...........................................................................................8 Appendix Draft EIS/EIR Public Involvement Materials Nimbus Hatchery Fish Passage Project EIS/EIR February 2011 Open House Summary Report i Acronyms Acronym Full Phrase CCAO Central California Area Office CCR California Code of Regulations CDFG California Department of Fish and Game CEQA California
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Passage at Dams Strategic Analysis
    Fish Passage at Dams Strategic Analysis Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources February 5, 2018 Nature-like Fishway at Thiensville Dam on Milwaukee River in Ozaukee County, WI Table of Contents Foreword ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 5 1 History of Fish Passage at Dams Policy in Wisconsin ............................................................................ 7 2 Regulatory Framework and Department Procedures and Guidelines ................................................ 11 3 Types of Fish Passage .......................................................................................................................... 19 3.1 Overview ..................................................................................................................................... 19 3.2 Upstream Fish Passage Technologies ......................................................................................... 19 3.2.1 Fishways (Passive) ............................................................................................................... 20 3.2.2 Fish Lifts and Locks (Active) ................................................................................................ 26 3.2.3 Collection and Transport (Active) ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 8 Chittenden Locks 47
    Seattle’s Aquatic Environments: Hiram M. Chittenden Locks Hiram M. Chittenden Locks The following write-up relies heavily on the Hiram M. Chittenden Locks/Salmon Bay Subarea Chapter by Fred Goetz in the Draft Reconnaissance Assessment – Habitat Factors that Contribute to the Decline of Salmonids by the Greater Lake Washington Technical Committee (2001). Overview The Hiram M. Chittenden Locks (Locks) were Operation of the navigational locks involves constructed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers raising or lowering the water level within either (the Corps) in 1916 and commissioned in 1917. the large or small lock chamber so that vessels may The Locks were built as a navigation project to pass between the two waterbodies. The filling and allow boats to travel from the marine waters of emptying of the large lock chamber is achieved by Puget Sound to the protected freshwaters of Lake use of a system of two large conduits that can Union and Lake Washington. The Locks are either fill the entire lock or half of the lock. This comprised of two navigational lock chambers: a is achieved by using a miter gate that divides the large lock that accommodates both large and small large lock chamber into two sections. Water is vessels and a small lock used by smaller vessels. In taken into the conduits via two culvert intakes addition to the lock chambers, the Locks include a located immediately upstream of the structure. dam, 6 spillway bays, and a fish ladder. Water is conveyed through each conduit and is The Locks form a dam at the outlet of the Lake discharged into the lock chamber through outlet Washington and Lake Union/Ship Canal system culverts on each side of the chamber.
    [Show full text]
  • The Efficiency of a Fish Ladder for Salmonid Upstream Migration in a Swedish Stream Potential Impact of a Hydropower Station on Connectivity and Recruitment
    The Efficiency of a Fish Ladder for Salmonid Upstream Migration in a Swedish Stream Potential Impact of a Hydropower Station on Connectivity and Recruitment Anton Larsson Degree project for Master of Science in Biology Animal Ecology, 30 hec, AT 2016 Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences University of Gothenburg Supervisors: Johan Höjesjö, Lars-Olof Ramnelid, Daniel Johansson Examiner: Charlotta Kvarnemo Abstract Assessments of the function of fish passages are typically rare, although the approach is frequently implemented to mitigate adverse effects of hydropower plants. In this study 249 electro fishing samples from 1979-2015, were used to assess the efficiency of a fish ladder to allow upstream migration of salmonids past a hydropower station in Örekilsälven, Sweden. Densities of brown trout (both young of the year, 0+, and older juveniles, >0+) did not increase in the area upstream the hydropower station after construction of the fish passage; neither did the densities of salmon 0+. >0+ salmon had a higher density upstream the hydropower station after completion of the fish ladder, however this is most likely explained by extensive fish translocations. 0+ salmon were only found in 5 % of the sampling occasions upstream the power station when translocations were removed, whereas 0+ brown trout were found in 44.3 %. No effect of discharge for ascension was found in the study. The efficiency of the passage was determined low and non-satisfactory for Atlantic salmon and brown trout, although the evaluation is more difficult for brown trout as a consequence of resident forms. Smolt models indicate that contemporary smolt escapement of both salmon and brown trout almost exclusively originate from the downstream areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Poster of AUBURN RAVINE FISH LADDER PROJECT Overview
    ENHANCING OUR REGIONAL ECOSYSTEM : AUBURN RAVINE FISH LADDER PROJECT nto s e uc m k ra e ttonwo c r o o a c d s Why Build a Fish Ladder ? Fish such as salmon and steelhead are anadromous, meaning they are born in freshwater streams and rivers, migrate downstream to the ocean where Plantings Fish they spend a few years maturing, then return to Sierra streams to spawn. Fish To improve ecosystem function and diversity, ladders are designed to provide migrating fish with support to pass around The fish in Auburn Ravine include Chinook native vegetation species were planted salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), a particular obstruction like this gauging station. The streambed in Auburn within the bed and along banks of the steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), Ravine has gravel areas that make suitable spawning habitat for anadromous Auburn Ravine fish ladder. Site specific plants were chosen to promote Sacramento pikeminnow (Ptychocheilus salmonids like fall and late fall-run Chinook salmon and steelhead trout. grandis), Sacramento sucker natural nutrient filtration, water quality, By installing this fish ladder on Auburn Ravine, a partial barrier to upstream (Catostomus occidentalis), Lamprey WHEN DO sediment trapping functions, and s (Entosphenus tridentatus) and Speckled te habitats has been removed making it easier for salmon and steelhead to erosion and bank stabilization controls. Dace (Rhinichthys osculus). Salmon, elhead reach these upstream spawning areas. THE FISH RUN? These vegetation species include steelhead and lamprey all use Auburn native sedge and rush grasses, willow, l a Ravine for spawning while the remaining alder and cottonwood. This restored fish are year-round residents.
    [Show full text]
  • Shoreline Inventory and Characterization Report
    Final Draft THURSTON COUNTY SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM UPDATE Inventory and Characterization Report SMA Grant Agreements: G0800104 and G1300026 June 30, 2013 Prepared By: Thurston County Planning Department Building # 1, 2nd Floor 2000 Lakeridge Drive SW Olympia, WA 98502-6045 This page left intentionally blank. Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................ 1 REPORT PURPOSE .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM UPDATES FOR CITIES WITHIN THURSTON COUNTY ...................................................................... 2 REGULATORY OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................................................. 2 SHORELINE JURISDICTION AND DEFINITIONS ........................................................................................................................ 3 REPORT ORGANIZATION .................................................................................................................................................. 5 2 METHODS ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 DETERMINING SHORELINE JURISDICTION LIMITS ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • South Puget Sound Forum Environmental Quality – Economic Vitality Indicators Report Updated July 2006
    South Puget Sound Forum Environmental Quality – Economic Vitality Indicators Report Updated July 2006 Making connections and building partnerships to protect the marine waters, streams, and watersheds of Nisqually, Henderson, Budd, Eld and Totten Inlets The economic vitality of South Puget Sound is intricately linked to the environmental health of the Sound’s marine waters, streams, and watersheds. It’s hard to imagine the South Sound without annual events on or near the water - Harbor Days Tugboat Races, Wooden Boat Fair, Nisqually Watershed Festival, Swantown BoatSwap and Chowder Challenge, Parade of Lighted Ships – and other activities we prize such as beachcombing, boating, fishing, or simply enjoying a cool breeze at a favorite restaurant or park. South Sound is a haven for relaxation and recreation. Businesses such as shellfish growers and tribal fisheries, tourism, water recreational boating, marinas, port-related businesses, development and real estate all directly depend on the health of the South Sound. With strong contributions from the South Sound, statewide commercial harvest of shellfish draws in over 100 million dollars each year. Fishing, boating, travel and tourism are all vibrant elements in the region’s base economy, with over 80 percent of the state’s tourism and travel dollars generated in the Puget Sound Region. Many other businesses benefit indirectly. Excellent quality of life is an attractor for great employees, and the South Puget Sound has much to offer! The South Puget Sound Forum, held in Olympia on April 29, 2006, provided an opportunity to rediscover the connections between economic vitality and the health of South Puget Sound, and to take action to protect the valuable resources of the five inlets at the headwaters of the Puget Sound Basin – Totten, Eld, Budd, Henderson, and the Nisqually Reach.
    [Show full text]