Agricultural Drainage Practices in Ireland

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Agricultural Drainage Practices in Ireland Agricultural Drainage Practices in Ireland "1". D. Ryan ments by developing main channels, and field drainage of An Foras Taluntais smaller parcels of land using pipes and open trenches. The Creagh, Ballinrobe, Co. Mayo use of cost/benefit analysis on the arterial drainage program Ireland is considered and the inherent errors are discussed, Conser- vation of the environment is described as it applies to land- scaping, fisheries, and wildlife, and the drainage authorities ABSTRACT/Agricultural drainage practices are reviewed are shown to have an enlightened attitude to proper preser- under two main headings: arterial drainage of river catch- vation of the world around us. Introduction vened and much of the work done then and later was Ireland is basically saucer-shaped, with a rim of relief work. The Drainage Act of 1863 transferred re- mountains and a flat central lowland. Rivers rising in- sponsibility for design and execution of schemes to the land must circumvent the mountains to reach the sea. owners of affected lands, the t\mction of the OPW Most of the rivers in Ireland do not flow directly to being to examine the merits of proposals, to consider the sea. For example the Shannon rises near Lough objections to schemes, and to advance the money re- Allen, 30 km from the coast but flows south and west quired. Further drainage acts were passed in 1925, 240 km to reach its tidal estuary. Likewise, the river 1926, and 1927. During all this time, 229 schemes Slaney rises west of Wicklow Mountains 30 km from were completed benefiting 198,000 ha, Most of these the sea, but travels 90 km to its' outfall at Wexford. schemes were heavily subsidized by the state although Such conditions give rise to poor gradients and poor in the period 1863-1925 the state contributed less channel development (Lynn, 1980). Flooding and high than 7% of the cost of arterial drainage. water-table levels result in consequent hardship and fi- In 1938 a drainage commission was set up which nancial loss. According to Gardiner and Radford recommended two fundamental and far-reaching (1980) wet mineral lowland soils cover 21% of the changes as fi~llows: First, the entire river catchment country or 27% of the agricuhural land. This land is should be used as the basis for the design and execu- inhibited by surplus water and requires drainage in tion of schemes; second, the initiative for undertaking one form or another to achieve its full potential. schemes should be vested in a central drainage au- Two organizations in Ireland are principally re- thority, the OPW, which would meet the full cost of sponsible for promoting improvements to drainage design and execution of schemes. The 1945 Arterial conditions. The Office of Public Works carries out im- Drainage Act gave effect to the reconnnendations and provements to arterial drainage systems (rivers and also conferred on t:he OPW responsibility for mainte- nance of completed schemes, with the cost of mainte- large collection drains), while the Farm Development nance to be borne by tim county councils. The provi- Service, a branch of the Department of Agricuhure, sions of the act meant the end of piecemeal drainage, administers field drainage operations. which often led to the transfer of a flooding problem fl-om one area to another, and protected the capital Arterial Drainage investment in drainage by ensuring that maintenance would be carried Otlt on a regular basis and to ade- History quate standards. Maintenance work is essential if The history of arterial drainage is described by tile channels are not to revert quickly to their original con- Ottice of Public Works (OPW) in their account of the ditkms. Under the 1945 act, 9 major catchments and cost-benefit analysis for the River Maigue Drainage 25 small catchments have been drained. Schemes cur- Scheme. The OPW first became associated with arte- rently in progress include the Boyne, Maigue, Corrib- rial drainage with the Drainage Act of 1842. It was Mask, Br and Boner (Fig. 1). made responsible for the design and execution of Under the early acts completed schemes were con- drainage works. It was the intention of this first act stituted as drainage districts, with responsibility tin that the cost of the works would be borne by the land- maintenance being vested in drainage trustees or holders, but the famine years 1846 and 1847 inter- boards. The cost of maintenance was to be levied on Environ Geoi Water Sci Vol. 9, No. 1,31-40 (c) 1986 Springer-Veria9New York Inc. 32 T.D. Ryan million af 12 I0 H Su r', e) plus ('onstruct ion Figure 1. Expenditure on arterial drainage has fluctuated substantially 6 over the last 30 years when ,neasured in real terms. Following government 4 cutbacks in the late 1950s, the eco- nomic boom of the 1960s caused ex- penditure to double until the Depart- ment of Finance intervened in 1964. Membership of the EEC made further funds available and activity increased 0 , , , ~ ~ I i I ; i 1 I J I I I J I I I I 1950 1955 1960 1911~ 1970 1975 198(I once more from 1974 onwards. the benefiting owners. This method of organization was for the most part a failure. Under the 1924 act, the OPW was empowered to carry out maintenance works on its own initiative. State grants of up to 50% of the cost were made available, the rest of the cost to be borne by the benetiting owners. The act was inef- tective, however, because many of the drainage dis- tricts had fallen into such a state of disrepair that com- plete redrainage rather than maintenance was re- quired. In subsequent drainage acts responsibility for financing maintenace work was transferred progres- sively to the county councils. Design and Construction During famine times, arterial drainage work was done by hand and it employed about 40,000 people at peak (Bruton and Convery, 1982). Now the process has become highly merchanized using dragline exca- vators and floating dredgers fi)r excavation, and spe- cialized equipment fi)r drilling and blasting rock (Fig. 2). Less than 1,000 people are currently employed on the schemes. Ahnost all of the arterial work has consisted of deepening and widening river channels to accommo- date existing river flows (Fig. 3). Other forms of im- provement, such as channel diversions and provision of storage reservoirs have been rarely used. The preliminary stage to design of ()pen channels Figure 2. Excavator. constituting a scheme is to survey the levels and the discharges in the catchment. Bed levels of the channels structures, sucb as flumes, weirs, and orifices, or and the levels of the benefiting lands are determined without fixed structures and using a calibrated section to provide a basis for the design levels of the tinished of streambed. For the latter system, a calibration curve scheme (Figs. 4, 5, 6). relating water level to flowrate must be built up by Flow measurement may be performed by tixed measuring flowrate for different water levels in the Agricultural Drainage Practices in Ireland 33 Figure 3. Design for flashfloods. A larger cross-section allows a greater increase in flow tot a given increase in bead. Figure 4. River before drainage. Figure 5. River after drainage, showing stripping of vegetation and canalization of the stream. Figure 6. Where the channel tmderneath a bridge or other structure is deepened, the slructtn'e is sometimes strengthened by underpinning to m,ercome damage to the fouudation. In this view, new concrete is visible as the base of two old sluice gates where the river Robe has been deepened by about 1.0 m. river. There are several methods for measuring water full development of agricultural potential of the im- flow in this situation. The OPW use a currentmeter proved lands and reduce overall flood damage to rela- placed at certain points in the water, e.g. at 0.2 and 0.8 tively small proportions (OPW, 1984). of the depth below the surface. Flow is measured like Bed levels in streams and rivers are determined by this at several points across a section. The w~lues are taking into account both dry weather flow and peak used to calculate a weighted average which when mul- discharge (3-year flood), and must permit drawdown tiplied by the cross-sectional area of the river yields the of the water table to at least 0.75 m below the surface flow through that section. This process is repeated on in benetiting lands (Howard, 1980). The procedure several different occasions with several different flow starts with the smallest drain and levels, and cross-sec- rates until a full staging curve can be drawn. Water tions are computed downstream to suit soil conditions level at this point is measured regularly, enabling a at as many places as is economically viable, Bed levels good record of flows to be built up. The OPW have allow for a gradient of 1:300 in incoming field drains 200 such gauging stations around the country, over at peak discharge in the stream. Channel cross-sections half of which have records extending over 30 years. for a given flow and gradient are generally obtained "/'he intbrmation on flow tlms gathered is used to pre- from the formula of Manning: dict the magnitude and fl'equency of floods. The information on water flows is used to deter- mine the 3-year flood, and this is normally used as the where Q = Discharge rate design criterion. This standard is considered capable R = Hydraulic radius of reducing the incidence of flooding during the 1 = Hydraulic gradient cropping period considerably (probably up to once in A = Wet cross section area 15 years) and would make possible the more or less Km = Roughness coefticient 34 T.D.
Recommended publications
  • Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 103, the Irish Bat Monitoring Programme
    N A T I O N A L P A R K S A N D W I L D L I F E S ERVICE THE IRISH BAT MONITORING PROGRAMME 2015-2017 Tina Aughney, Niamh Roche and Steve Langton I R I S H W I L D L I F E M ANUAL S 103 Front cover, small photographs from top row: Coastal heath, Howth Head, Co. Dublin, Maurice Eakin; Red Squirrel Sciurus vulgaris, Eddie Dunne, NPWS Image Library; Marsh Fritillary Euphydryas aurinia, Brian Nelson; Puffin Fratercula arctica, Mike Brown, NPWS Image Library; Long Range and Upper Lake, Killarney National Park, NPWS Image Library; Limestone pavement, Bricklieve Mountains, Co. Sligo, Andy Bleasdale; Meadow Saffron Colchicum autumnale, Lorcan Scott; Barn Owl Tyto alba, Mike Brown, NPWS Image Library; A deep water fly trap anemone Phelliactis sp., Yvonne Leahy; Violet Crystalwort Riccia huebeneriana, Robert Thompson. Main photograph: Soprano Pipistrelle Pipistrellus pygmaeus, Tina Aughney. The Irish Bat Monitoring Programme 2015-2017 Tina Aughney, Niamh Roche and Steve Langton Keywords: Bats, Monitoring, Indicators, Population trends, Survey methods. Citation: Aughney, T., Roche, N. & Langton, S. (2018) The Irish Bat Monitoring Programme 2015-2017. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No. 103. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Culture Heritage and the Gaeltacht, Ireland The NPWS Project Officer for this report was: Dr Ferdia Marnell; [email protected] Irish Wildlife Manuals Series Editors: David Tierney, Brian Nelson & Áine O Connor ISSN 1393 – 6670 An tSeirbhís Páirceanna Náisiúnta agus Fiadhúlra 2018 National Parks and Wildlife Service 2018 An Roinn Cultúir, Oidhreachta agus Gaeltachta, 90 Sráid an Rí Thuaidh, Margadh na Feirme, Baile Átha Cliath 7, D07N7CV Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, 90 North King Street, Smithfield, Dublin 7, D07 N7CV Contents Contents ................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ireland Under the Normans Goddard Henry Orpen
    The Sub-Infeudation Of Connaught 1237 And Afterwards Ireland Under The Normans 1169-1216 By Goddard Henry Orpen LATE SCHOLAR OF TRINITY COLLEGE,DUBLIN EDITOR OF 'THE SONG OF DERMOT AND THE EARL ' MEMBER OF THE ROYAL IRISH ACADEMY 1911 Richard de Burgh had now a free hand in Connaught, and though sundry attempts at occupation had been made at various times since the beginning of the century, the effective settlement of Anglo- Normans in the province may be said to have commenced in 1237. In that year, says the Irish annalist, ‘ the barons of Erin came and commenced to build castles in it’. In the following year ‘ castles were erected in Muinter Murchada (the northern half of the barony of Clare, County Galway), Conmaicne Cuile (the barony of Kilmaine, south of the river Robe, County Mayo), and in Cera (the barony of Carra, County Mayo) by the aforesaid barons’. [1] Save for personal quarrels among the O’Conors themselves the peace was unbroken. Unfortunately there is no contemporary summary of Richard de Burgh’s enfeoffments, such as the Song of Dermot gives of those of Strongbow and the elder Hugh de Lacy, and though there trans- cripts in the ‘ Red Book of the Earl of Kildare’ and in the ‘ Gormanston Register’ of several charters of this period, we are largely dependent on indications in the annals, and on inferences from later documents and records for our knowledge of the Anglo-Norman settlement in Connaught. Indeed the first comprehensive account is to be gleaned from the Inquisitions taken in 1333 [2] after the murder of William de Burgh, Earl of Ulster, fifteen years after the great disruption caused by the Scottish invasion under Edward Bruce, and at a time when the royal power in Ireland had begun to wax faint.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Through OPW’S Social Text Web Page and Include the Following;
    Environmental River Enhancement Programme 2008 – 2012 Final Report May 2013 Inland Fisheries Ireland Inland Fisheries Ireland i Inland Fisheries Ireland Acknowledgments The assistance and support of OPW staff, of all grades, from each of the three Drainage Maintenance Regions is gratefully appreciated. The support provided by regional IFI officers, in respect of site inspections and follow up visits and assistance with electrofishing surveys is also acknowledged. Overland access was kindly provided by landowners in a range of channels and across a range of OPW drainage schemes. Project Personnel Members of the EREP team include: Dr. Martin O’Grady Dr. James King Dr. Karen Delanty Brian Coghlan Rossa O’Briain Michelle O’Regan The report includes Ordnance Survey Ireland data reproduced under OSi Copyright Permit No. MP 007508. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Ordnance Survey Ireland and Government of Ireland copyright. © Ordnance Survey Ireland, 2012. ii Inland Fisheries Ireland iii Inland Fisheries Ireland Table of Contents .............................................................................................................................................. i Acknowledgments ..................................................................................................................... i Table of Contents .................................................................................................................... iv 1 Introduction .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Irish Fisheries Investigation S
    IRISH FISHERIES INVESTIGATION S SERIES A (Freshwater) No. 12 (1973) AN ROINN TALMHAIOCHTA AGUS IASCAIGH (Department of Agriculture and Fisheries) FO-ROINN IASCAIGH (Fisheries Division) DUBLIN: PUBLISHED BY THE STATIONERY OFFICE TO BE PURCHASED FROM THE GOVERNMENT PUBLICATIONS SALE OFFICE, G.P.O. ARCADE. DUBLIN. 7tp IRISH FISHERIES INVESTIGATIONS SERIES A (FRESHWATER) No. 12 (1973) J. J. BRACKEN TIlE AGE AND GROWTH OF PIKE Esox lucius FROM FOUR IRISH TROUT RIVERS The age and growth of pike Esox lucius from four Irish trout rivers by J. J. BRACKEN Zoological Department, University College, Dublin. ABSTRACT Age and growth of pike Esox lucius L. taken by electrical fishing in four typical Irish trout rivers were determined, using isometric axis of scales. Age data showed that young pike dominated in catches in all four rivers. Very few pike older than four yc'ars were captured. Growth of pike in these rivers was compared with earlier results obtained for lake pike. River pike were much smaller than fish of similar age from the larger limestone' lakes. Tag and recapture data from the Camlin river" confirmed that mean growth results were very similar to back-calculated means per year class. Data showed little movement of pike within this system and that electrical fishing was reasonably efficient for clearance' of coarse fish in shallow trout waters. Stomach contents of pike taken in Robe and Camlin rivers were qualitatively analysed. Since 1952 the Inland Fisheries Trust's development programme has included the removal 01 pike and other coarse fishes from a number of Irish trout lakes and rivers.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Rivers of Ireland
    Sl. No River Name Length Comments 1 Abbert River 25.25 miles (40.64 km) 2 Aghinrawn Fermanagh 3 Agivey 20.5 miles (33.0 km) Londonderry 4 Aherlow River 27 miles (43 km) Tipperary 5 River Aille 18.5 miles (29.8 km) 6 Allaghaun River 13.75 miles (22.13 km) Limerick 7 River Allow 22.75 miles (36.61 km) Cork 8 Allow, 22.75 miles (36.61 km) County Cork (Blackwater) 9 Altalacky (Londonderry) 10 Annacloy (Down) 11 Annascaul (Kerry) 12 River Annalee 41.75 miles (67.19 km) 13 River Anner 23.5 miles (37.8 km) Tipperary 14 River Ara 18.25 miles (29.37 km) Tipperary 15 Argideen River 17.75 miles (28.57 km) Cork 16 Arigna River 14 miles (23 km) 17 Arney (Fermanagh) 18 Athboy River 22.5 miles (36.2 km) Meath 19 Aughavaud River, County Carlow 20 Aughrim River 5.75 miles (9.25 km) Wicklow 21 River Avoca (Ovoca) 9.5 miles (15.3 km) Wicklow 22 River Avonbeg 16.5 miles (26.6 km) Wicklow 23 River Avonmore 22.75 miles (36.61 km) Wicklow 24 Awbeg (Munster Blackwater) 31.75 miles (51.10 km) 25 Baelanabrack River 11 miles (18 km) 26 Baleally Stream, County Dublin 27 River Ballinamallard 16 miles (26 km) 28 Ballinascorney Stream, County Dublin 29 Ballinderry River 29 miles (47 km) 30 Ballinglen River, County Mayo 31 Ballintotty River, County Tipperary 32 Ballintra River 14 miles (23 km) 33 Ballisodare River 5.5 miles (8.9 km) 34 Ballyboughal River, County Dublin 35 Ballycassidy 36 Ballyfinboy River 20.75 miles (33.39 km) 37 Ballymaice Stream, County Dublin 38 Ballymeeny River, County Sligo 39 Ballynahatty 40 Ballynahinch River 18.5 miles (29.8 km) 41 Ballyogan Stream, County Dublin 42 Balsaggart Stream, County Dublin 43 Bandon 45 miles (72 km) 44 River Bann (Wexford) 26 miles (42 km) Longest river in Northern Ireland.
    [Show full text]
  • Patrick Went Further West. the Life and Writings of St. Patrick With
    Patrick went further west. The Life and Writings of St. Patrick with Appendices, Etc By The Most Rev. Dr. Healy, Archbishop of Tuam. 1905 • I. — Patrick amongst Ciarraige of Mayo. THENCE from ‘ Ciarraige Airtech’ Patrick went further west to ‘ Ciarraige Arne,’ where he met Ernaisc and his son, Loarnach, sitting under a tree. And Patrick wrote an alphabet or catechism for the youth Loarnach, and he remained with him—Patrick and his family of twelve men [1]—for a week, or more. And Patrick founded a church in that place, and made him the abbot or superior thereof, and he was, indeed, a man full of the Holy Spirit. This shows us what we know otherwise must be true—that Patrick spent a week, or some- times a fortnight, in each new district, preaching, baptising, and building his church with the help of the willing hands of the people. On Sunday he consecrated it ; and when he had no man of his own ‘ family’ ready to place over it he took some other likely youth, generally a son of the chief, gave him a catechism, taught him how to say his psalter, read his missal and his ritual, and then ordained him for the service of the Church. But these boys were educated youths ; they had well-trained memories, for they generally belonged to the schools of the Bards or Brehons, and so in a very short time they could be trained to do the indispensable work of the ministry. But we must also assume that for some time they accompanied the Saint on his missionary journeys in their own neighbourhood, and when that was impossible he left one or more of his own ‘ familia’ to give them further instructions and moral guidance.
    [Show full text]
  • My Tour of Mayo 1849 the Plantation Scheme; the West of Ireland A
    My tour of Mayo 1849 The Plantation Scheme; Or, The West of Ireland As A Field for Investment. James Caird • Among the various projects for the regeneration of Ireland, none has excited so much attention as the Plantation Scheme, developed by Sir Robert Peel. It at once gained the notice of England, and raised the drooping hopes of Ireland, while it also indicated a new and untried field for the enterprise of the capitalist, landlord, and skilled farmer. At the time of its announcement, the competition for farms in Scotland, and the consequent in- crease of rent, was progressing to such a degree as materially to lessen the profits of the farmer ; and the development of the Plantation Scheme was, therefore, hailed as possibly an advantageous outlet for our agricultural capital and skill. The success of the scheme would be, in an important degree, secured, if to the philanthropic views of statesmen and great capitalist companies, could be added the narrower, but still equally essential principle, of commercial profit to the men through whom its de- velopment was to be practically accomplished. Inquiry was then made for sources of information whence might be learned the nature of the soil, its capabilities, its advantages or disadvantages, as compared with this country, and the probable feeling of the population towards immigrant farmers ; but on these points the different “ tours” in Ireland were altogether deficient. To satisfy himself, the Author resolved to visit the country ; and his tour proved so interesting and instructive to him, that he hoped its publication might, in some degree, supply the information wanted.
    [Show full text]
  • Irish Bat Monitoring Programme
    Irish Bat Monitoring Programme All-Ireland Daubenton’s Bat Waterway Survey 2006 2006 Report Irish Bat Monitoring Programme All-Ireland Daubenton’s Bat Waterway Survey 2006 2006 Report Tina Aughney 1, Steve Langton 2, Niamh Roche 1 , Jon Russ 3 and Philip Briggs 3 1. Bat Conservation Ireland, www.batconservationireland.org 2. steve&[email protected] 3. Bat Conservation Trust UK, www.bats.org.uk Citation: Aughney, T., Langton, S., Roche, N., Russ, J. and Briggs, P. (2007) All-Ireland Daubenton’s Bat Waterway Survey 2006, Irish Bat Monitoring Programme. Bat Conservation Ireland www.batconservationireland.org . Cover Photograph © Frank Greenway ii CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY iv 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Why monitor Duabenton’s bats Myotis daubentonii ? 1 1.2 Daubenton’s bat Myotis daubentonii : a brief species profile 2 1.2.1 Distribution 2 1.2.2 Surveying Daubenton’s bats 1.2.2.1 Emergence behaviour of Daubenton’s bats during summer months 3 1.2.2.2 Feeding behaviour of Daubenton’s bats during summer months 3 1.2.2.3 Echolocation calls and foraging style of Daubenton’s bats 3 1.2.2.4 Identifying the Daubenton’s bat using bat detectors 3 1.2.2.5 Bat passes: a tool for surveying Daubenton’s bats 4 1.2.3 The BCT Daubenton’s bat Waterway Survey 4 2. THE ALL-IRELAND DAUBENTON’S BAT WATERWAY SURVEY 2006: AIMS AND METHODS 2.1 Aims of Report 5 2.2 Methods 5 2.3 Volunteer uptake and participation 5 3. RESULTS 3.1 Training 7 3.2 Volunteer participation in 2006 7 3.3 Waterway sites surveyed in 2006 9 3.4 Number of completed surveys 11 3.5 Number of bat ‘passes’ recorded in 2006 11 3.6 Statistical Analysis of Results 15 3.7 Power Analysis – detecting Amber and Red Alerts for Daubenton’s bats 18 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Protection Agency
    Environmental Protection Agency Establishment of Groundwater Source Protection Zones Kilmaine Public Water Supply Scheme May 2014 Prepared by: Coran Kelly TOBIN With contributions from: Henning Moe, Michal Smietanka (CDM Smith), Dr. David Drew, Consultant Geologist; Dr. Caoimhe Hickey (GSI) And with assistance from: Mayo County Council, Teagasc, and local farmers Environmental Protection Agency Kilmaine SPZ PROJECT DESCRIPTION Since the 1980’s, the Geological Survey of Ireland (GSI) has undertaken a considerable amount of work developing Groundwater Protection Schemes throughout the country. Groundwater Source Protection Zones are the surface and subsurface areas surrounding a groundwater source, i.e. a well, wellfield or spring, in which water and contaminants may enter groundwater and move towards the source. Knowledge of where the water is coming from is critical when trying to interpret water quality data at the groundwater source. The Source Protection Zone also provides an area in which to focus further investigation and is an area where protective measures can be introduced to maintain or improve the quality of groundwater. The project “Establishment of Groundwater Source Protection Zones”, led by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), represents a continuation of the GSI’s work. A CDM/TOBIN/OCM project team has been retained by the EPA to establish Groundwater Source Protection Zones at monitoring points in the EPA’s National Groundwater Quality Network. A suite of maps and digital GIS layers accompany this report and the reports and maps are hosted on the EPA and GSI websites (www.epa.ie; www.gsi.ie). ii Environmental Protection Agency Kilmaine SPZ TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Impact Statement for a Factory Extension at Ballinrobe, Co
    Planning Ref. No.: n/a IG: 517987/765597 RMP: n/a ÆGIS REF.: 610‐1 Archaeological Impact Statement for a factory extension at Ballinrobe, Co. Mayo. For inspection purposes only. Consent of copyright owner required for any other use. Report Author: F. Coyne BA MIAI Client: Michael Watson, O'Callaghan Moran & Associates, Environmental Consultants, Granary House, Rutland St, Cork Date: August 2013 EPA Export 04-03-2014:23:27:31 Archaeological Impact Statement for a factory extension at Ballinrobe, Co.Mayo Copies of this report Client — C/o Michael Watson, O’Callaghan Moran & Associates, Environmental have been Consultants, Granary House, Rutland St, Cork presented by ÆGIS to: Please note… That the archaeological recommendations, mitigation proposals and suggested methodology followed in this report are similar to those used on previous similar projects approved by the Archaeological Planning and Licencing Unit National Monuments Service, Room G50, Custom House, Dublin 1 The National Monuments Acts 1930‐2004, The Planning and Development Act 2002 (plus any amendments) and the most recent EPA guidelines were consulted. Guidelines and Plans issued from time‐to‐time by the statutory bodies have been consulted. These are listed in the reference section of this report. Every effort has been taken in the preparation and submission of this report to provide as complete an assessment as possible within the terms of the brief, and all statements and opinions are offered in good faith. However, ÆGIS cannot accept responsibility for errors of fact or opinion resulting from the data supplied by any third party, for any loss or other consequences arising from decisions made or actions taken on the basis of facts and opinions expressed in this report, (and any supplementary information), howsoever such facts and opinions may have been derived, or as the result of unknown and undiscovered sites or artefacts.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (821Kb)
    COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNI"!lES Bru~s. 04.09. 1996 COM(96) 388 final ANNUAL REPORT OF THE COHESION FUND 1995 ANNEX 1-TRELAND - ENVIRONMENT Due to the excessive length of this report, it has been broken down into sections: Report, pages 1-99 Annex I - Main Points of the Decisions approved in 1995 Spain- Environment pp. I 00-310 Spain-Transport pp. 311-356 Portugal - Environment pp. 357-407 Portugal - Transport pp. 408-413 Greece - Environment pp. 414-478 Greece-Transport pp. 479-504 Ireland-Environment pp. 505-532 Ireland - Transport 523-559 Annex 2 - Tables and Graphs pp. 560-571 Annex 3-Maps of the roads and railway networks pp. 572-580 IRELAND···· ·• ENVIRONMENT . : ,'· :Publication of the main· pointS 9f the. ))ecision to grant aSsistance wider Regulation 1164/94 establislling the Cohesion Fund . Proje~t Number: ~3/07/61/010/02.2/026 . 1. Nanie of project: River,Barrow Water Quality Improvenie~t ~cheme 2. Organization responsible for the application 2.1 Name: Department of the Environment 2.2 Address: O'Connell Bridge Hou.se Dublin 2, Ireland· . .· 3. Organization .responsible for project implementation 3.1 Name: Carlow Co. Council Athy Urban Distr. Council New Ross Urban Distr. Council · ·3.2 Addt-ess: ·County Offices Rathste.wart .The Tholsel Carlow Athy, Co. Kildare New Ross, Co. Wexford Ireland Ireland Ireland '· 4. Location of project 4.1 Membet· State:' ,;Ireland · 4.2 County: Co. Cadow, Kildare and Wexford, Ireland 5. Description of pmject This Decision covers,three sewerage schem~s in Athy Muinebheag and New Ross which are all intended to improve significantly.
    [Show full text]
  • A0011-01 APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENT SCREENING for HOLLYMOUNT WASTEWATER DISCHARGE Certificate of Authorisation Application August 2010
    Comhairle Contae Mhaigh Eo Aras an Chontae, Caislean an Bharraigh, Contae Mhaigh Eo. Teileaf6n: (094) 9024444 Facs: (094) 9023937 Do Thag. / Your Re£ ADO 11-0 1 Ar dTag. / Our Re£ WS 512 3nd September 2010. Administration, Environmental Licensing Programme, Office of Climate, Licensing & Resource Use, Environmental Protection Agency, Headquarters, P.O. Box 3000 Johnstown Castle Estate, County Wexford. RE: WASTE WATER DISCHARGE CERTIFICATE APPLICATION REGISTRATION NO: A0011-01 - HOllYMOUNT Dear Or. Creed, Further to your letter of 7th April 2010, I enclose the required response to the query raised in the correspondence. This documentation includes: • 1 no. signed copy & 1 no. copy in hardcopy format of the documentation • 1 no. copies of all files in electronic searchable PDF format on CD-ROM For inspection purposes only. • 1 copies of digital geo-referencedConsent of copyright owner drawing required for any files other use.on CD ROM The content of the electronic files on the accompanying CD-ROM is a true copy of the original documentation. Thank you, Yours sincerely Paddy Mahon DIRECTOR OF SERVICES www.mayococo.te. Mayo County Council Aras an Chontae, Castlebar, Co. Mayo. Tel: (094) 9024444 Fax: (094) 9023937 EPA Export 26-07-2013:23:03:24 Hollymount Waste Water Discharge Certificate of Authorisation Application Regulation 25(c)(ii) Reply Contents Regulation 24 Compliance Requirements ................................................... August 2010 Attachments: ........................................................Revised August 2010 Attachment F.1 Screening for Appropriate Assessment Appendix A - Waste Assimilative Capacity Appendix B – Site Synopses For SACs Appendix C – Flow Chart from Appendix 1 of Circular L8/08 Regulation 24 Compliance Requirements ....................................................................CD For inspection purposes only.
    [Show full text]