Minutes of the 4.13th Meetings of the State Level Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC), (Raj.), held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019. The 4.13th Meeting of the members of State Level Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC), constituted for considering environmental clearance projects (B-category) under GoI Notification 14.03.2017 was held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019 at 11:00 AM, in the meeting hall of RPCB, under the Chairmanship of Sh. Manoj Kumar Agrawal. The names of the members who attended the meeting are as follows:- S. Name Designation 27.05.2019 28.05.2019 29.05.2019 30.05.2019 No.

1 Sh. Manoj Kumar Chairman Attended Attended Attended Attended Agrawal 2 Dr. Suja George Vice - - - Attended Chairman 3 Sh. Pushakar Singh Member Attended Attended Attended Attended Shekhawat 4 Sh. Mukesh Behari Member Attended Attended Attended Attended Sharma 5 Sh. Laxmi Kant Dashora Member - Attended Attended Attended

6 Sh. Buddhi Prakash Member Attended Attended Attended Attended Pareek 7 Sh. Vikram Singh Member Attended Attended Attended - Chauhan 8 Sh. N.K. Khare Co-opted Attended Attended - Attended Member The Secretary welcomed the members.

The SEAC considered the following 49 projects.

S.NO SEAC. Project Name Proponent Name NO. 1. 15772 ToR application for the Project Proponent Name- RIICO Ltd., development of “Industrial Area Add-Udyog Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur, Project, Tehsil- Rajasthan, Ext., Distt.- Churu, Rajasthan, Email- @riico.co.in By M/s RIICO, Khasra No. Consultant – GRASS ROOTS 196/1, 198, 200/1, 202/1 RESEARCH & CREATION (P) (Praposal No. – 75626) LTD. F – 374-375, Sector-63, Noida, U.P. Email- [email protected], eia@grc- india.com 2. 15734 ToR for "Archi Royal City" Project Proponent-M/S Archi Civil proposed commercial & Group Construction Pvt. Ltd., Address-Ground Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

Housing Project by M/S Archi Floor, Archi Building, 100 ft Road Civil Construction Pvt. Ltd. at Towards DPS Near Shobagpura Circle, plot no.1 (At Khasra No. 1454/1, ,Email- 1458/1,1462/1,1459,1460), [email protected] Dholi Magri (Bedwas) , Girwa, Name of the Consultant:- TEAM Udaipur, Rajasthan. (Proposal Institute of Science & Technology Pvt. No-85142). Ltd. E-65, Chitranjan marg, , C-Scheme, [email protected], 3. 15676 Submission of ToR application Project Proponent Name- HINDUSTAN i.e. Form-1 and PFR along with PETROLEUM CORPORATION relevant documents for grant of LIMITED,Jaipur Terminal, Vill-Bagru Terms of Reference (TOR) for kalan ,Dist-Jaipur, (raj).Email-Not given proposed Expansion of storage Consultant – Mantec Consultants Pvt. capacity of Jaipur POL Terminal Ltd, Environment Division, D-36, Sector- of HPCL by 131 KL (from 6, Noida, (UP). 36738 KL to 36869 KL) by increasing the height of TF- 10.(Proposal No-30357) 4. 15678 ToR application i.e. Form-1 and Project Proponent-Hindustan Petroleum PFR along with relevant corporation Limited,Add- Terminal, documents for grant of Terms of vill-Sardhana, NH-8, Beawar Highway, Reference for proposed Ajmer (raj), Email-Not given Expansion of storage capacity of Consultant Name-:-Mantec Consultants Ajmer POL Terminal of HPCL Pvt. Ltd, Environment Division, D-36, by 240.8 kL ( from 52518 KL Sector-6, Noida, (UP). to 52758.8 KL) by increasing the height of TF-10. .(Proposal No- 30332) 5. 15735 EC of proposed Affordable Project Proponent-SN Associates, Housing "Neelkanth Address-SN Associates, Shop No.8, VIP Mansarovar" (Under Chief Complex, Dadabari Main Road, Kota, Minister Jan Awas Yojna, 2015) (Rajasthan),Email- coming up at Khasra no.542/175 [email protected], at village- Borkahndi, Baran [email protected] Road, Kota, (Rajasthan), Consultant Name-Gaurang Promoted by S.N.Associates. Environmental Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Add- (Proposal No-93607). 102, SNG, Shree Ratna, Apartment, Near Tambi Petrol pump, Teetal factory, Jhotwara road, Jaipur,Email- [email protected] 6. 15770 EC for proposed Cement Project Proponent Name- “LC Cement Grinding Unit coming up at Works LIP”, Location: 700/20, Village- khasra No. 700/20, Vill.- Bakliawas, Merta, Distt.- Nagaur, Bakliawas, Merta, Distt.- Rajasthan , Email.- Nagaur, Rajasthan promoted by [email protected] M/s LC Cement Works LIP. Consultant-Gaurang Environmental Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

(Praposal No-30131) Solutions Pvt. Ltd. 102, SNG Shree Ratna, Peetal Factory, Bani Park, Jaipur Rajasthan , Email.- [email protected] 7. 15771 Regarding Amendment in Project Proponent Name- RAMA Environment Clearance of Rama PHOSPHATES LIMITED. Plot No. Phosphate Ltd. An existing 4807/11, Jhamarkotra Road, Village – Phosphate fertilizer Umar, Tehsil- Girwa, State- Udaipur, manufacturing nuite, situated at Rajasthan, Email.- # 4807/11, Jhamarkota Road, [email protected] Village- Umra, Tehsil- Girwa, Consultant– Gaurang Environmental Distt.- Udaipur (Raj) Solutions Pvt. Ltd. 102, SNG Shree Ratna (Praposal No-30679) Apartments, Near Tambi Petrol Pump, Jothwara Road, Jaipur Rajasthan, Email- [email protected] 8. 15691 EC of proposed Affordable Project Proponent- Fazal Associates, Housing Project "Ekta Add-24, Ground Floor, Aakash Mall, Residency" at khasra no. Aerodrome circle, Dist-Kota,(Raj.),Email- 274/144,275/144,279/145 (part), ektaresidency20182gmail.com, 145(part) village Manpura, [email protected] Tehsil-Ladpura, Kota, Promoted Consultant Name-Gaurang by Fazal Associates. (Proposal Environmental Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Add- No-91601). 501,Soni's Paris Point, Collectorate Circle, Bani Park , Jaipur,Rajasthan, Email- [email protected] ; 9. 15592 Submission of Application for Project Proponent Name-M/S- Nalwaya Prior Environmental Clearance – Mineral Industries Pvt. Ltd. Add- R/O- 7- Form I along with Pre- A,Bapu Bazar, Udaipur, Email- Feasibility Report of Panchpura [email protected] Soapstone & Dolomite mine Consultant Name-Udaipur Min-Tech over an area of 31.39hect PVT. LTD.,Add-206,Apeksha (M.L.No-5/2001) Village Complex.Sec-11.,Udaipur Panchpura,Tehsil-Sabla, (Raj) [email protected] District-Dungarpur,Rajasthan in favor of M/S Nalwaya Industries Pvt.Ltd. Praposal No-29383) 10. 15593 Submission of Application for Project Proponent Name-M/S- Nalwaya Prior Environmental Clearance – Mineral Industries Pvt. Ltd. Add- R/O- 7- Form I along with Pre- A,Bapu Bazar, Udaipur, Email- Feasibility Report of Deopur-1 [email protected] Soapstone & Dolomite mine Consultant Name-Udaipur Min-Tech over an area of 31.91hect. PVT. LTD.,Add-206,Apeksha (M.L.No-4/65 & 07/98) near Complex.Sec-11.Hiran Magri,Udaipur Village –Deopur,Tehsil- Sabla & (Raj) [email protected] District- Dungarpur (Raj) in favour of M/S Nalwaya Mineral Industries PVT.LTD. Praposal Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

No-28605) 11. 15594 Submission of application for Project Proponent Name-M/S-Deepak ToR (Prior Environmental Mineral Industries, ADD-Bagri Mohalla, Clearance )-Form I along with Bikaner -334001, MoB-9414139607 Pre-Feasibility Report for Sarah Consultant Name-Udaipur Min-Tech Kishnayat Ball Clay ,Fire Clay PVT. LTD.,Add-206,Apeksha ,Red & &Yellow Ochre Mine Complex.Sec-11.Hiran Magri,Udaipur Lease, Area -69.59hect. (Raj) [email protected] M.L.No.21/04 Near village – Sarah Kishnayat, Tehsil- Kolayat, District- Bikaner,Rajasthan,of M/S Deepak Mineral Industriesin Compliance of MoEF’s Notification dt.14/08/2018 Praposal No-29973) 12. 15604 ToR for Nathara ki Pal -IA Project Proponent Name- M/S Nalwaya Soapstone Mine Lease Area - Mineral Industries Pvt. Ltd.Add-7-A Bapu 97.13 hect. M.L. No-6/98 at near Bazar, Udaipur,313001,Email- Village- Nathara Ki Pal ,Tehsil- [email protected] Sarada, District- Udaipur, State- Consultant Name-M/S Udaipur Min-Tech Rajasthan, Lessee-M/S Nalwaya Pvt. Ltd. Add.-206,Apeksha Mineral Industries Pvt. Ltd. in Complex,Sec,-11,Hiran Magri,Udaipur compliance of MoEF's (Raj),[email protected] Notification dt.14.08.2018. 13. 15532 Terms of reference of Sapstone Project Proponent - M/S Tarun Minerals, Mine (ML.NO. 05/1999), Area:- Add- Near Jain Temple, Tehsil Kherwara, 24.92 Ha. Production Capacity:- Distt. - Udaipur, (Raj.), 25000 TPA, Khasra No. - Not [email protected] given, Village - Mandwa, Tehsil Consultants:- Apex Mintech Consultant, & Distt. - Udaipur (Raj.) Add- 3, Dhebar Colony, Near I.T.I Pratapnagar Udaipur, (Raj.) Eamil:- [email protected] , [email protected] [email protected] 14. 15533 Terms of Reference of Quartz, Project Proponent - M/S Seth Pusa Lal Feldspar & Mica Ghoras, Mansinghka Pvt. Ltd., Add- Pusa Niwas, Bhagatpura, Bhunas Mine Near Under Bridge, Pos & Distt. - (ML.NO.18/91), Rev. M.L. No. Bhilwara, (Raj.), Email:- 991/2011, Area:-38.77 Ha. [email protected] (Ghors - 18.52 ha. Bhunas- Consultants:- Apex Mintech Consultant, 9.00., Ha., Bhagatpura- 11.25 Add- 3, Dhebar Colony, Near I.T.I ha.) Production Capacity :- Pratapnagar Udaipur, (Raj.) Eamil:- 30,000 TPA, Khasra No. - [email protected] , 45G/15, Add:- Village - [email protected] Mandal, Sahada, Deogarh & [email protected] Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

Distt. - Bhilwara (Raj.) 15. 15737 ToR in respect of Rajol Project Proponent Name- Shri Ashok (kalyanpur) soapstone Mine Kumar karwa,Add-Industrial Area, (M.L. No.02/87, Area of Pratapnagar, Udaipur,Email- 19.1881 ha.) of Shri Ashok [email protected], Kumar karwa, situated near [email protected] village Rajol (kalyanpur) Tehsil- Name of the Consultant :- Apex Mintech Klyanpur & Disltrict-Udaipur Consultant, Add:- 3 Dhebar Colony, Near Rajasthan.Khasra no-46E/13. I.T.I., Pratapnagar, Distt. Udaipur, (Raj.), (Praposal No-31034) Email:- [email protected], [email protected] 16. 15602 ToR for proposed expansion Project Proponent Name-M/s Reverence mining project of "Quartz Mines & minerals Pvt.Ltd.,Director & Feldspar,Calcity and Masonry Authorized -Mr.Inder Kumar, Add-A-28, Stone mine (M.L.-34/04)" at Anita Colony ,Bajaj , Jaipur,E-Mail- near Village -Atbhigha, Tehsil- [email protected] Khandela, District-Sikar,State- Name of the Consultant :- TEAM Rajasthan, Promoted By M/S Institute of Science & Technology Pvt. Reverence Mines & Minerals Ltd.,E-65,Chitranjan marg,C- Pvt. Ltd. Plot/Survey/Khasra Scheme,Jaipur, no- Toposheet No -45M/10.Area no-20.00hect.Praposal no- 75949 17. 15607 EC for our Proposed Expansion Project Proponent Name- M/S of Mining Project "Quartz & K.K.Mines & Minerals,Add-9 Press Feldspar Mine (M.L.No- Complex, Near Bhagat Choraha, 38/2006)" Near village-kharwa, Bewar,Ajmer,Email- Tehsil-Masuda, District-Ajmer, [email protected] Rajasthan Promoted by M/S Consultant Name- TEAM Institute of K.K.Mines & Minerals.Area- Science & Technology Pvt. Ltd. E-65, 17.9375 Hect., (P-89398) Chitranjan marg, , C-Scheme, Jaipur 18. 15507 ToR for mining project “china Proponent Name- M/S – Deedwaniya & clay, soap stone & sillca sand Sons Add:- D-4, Nagori Garden, Bhilwara, mine (M.L. No-20/83, Renew Raj. E-mail ID. [email protected] M.L. No.-60/02)” Village – Name of the Consultant-TEAM Institute Bhinai Khera , Tehsil, of Science & Technology Pvt. Ltd. Add. E- Mandalgarh, district- Bhilwara , 65, Chitranjan Marg , C-Scheme jaipur. state- Rajasthan , M/S – Deedwaniya & Sons. Area :- 32.37ha Annual Production 8,25,000 TPA khasra no. not given. (Praposal no-78693) 19. 15508 ToR for mining project “ Quartz Proponent Name- smt. Sushma Arora, Feldspar & Mica mine M.L- Add:- D-4, Nagori Garden, Bhilwara, Raj. 275/05” Village – Dholi ,Tehsil- E-mail ID. [email protected] Asindi, District-Bhilwara ,State- Name of the Consultant-TEAM Institute Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

Rajasthan , Area :- 49.00ha, of Science & Technology Pvt. Ltd. Add. E- Annual Production capcity 65, Chitranjan Marg , C-Scheme jaipur. 33,500 Tonnes khasra No. Not given .(Praposal no-28694) 20. 15509 ToR for Mining project “Quartz Proponent Name- M/S-Mineral Deposit Feldspar & Mica mine M.L- Add:- D-4, Nagori Garden, Bhilwara, Raj. 21/2000” Village –Ruppura E-mail ID. [email protected] ,Tehsil-Asindi, District-Bhilwara Name of the Consultant-TEAM Institute ,State-Rajasthan , Area :- of Science & Technology Pvt. Ltd. Add. E- 24.78ha Annual Production 65, Chitranjan Marg , C-Scheme jaipur. 1,00,000 TPA khasra no. not given .(Praposal no-28698) 21. 15664 ToR for Barna Limestone ( P.P.Name-Shri Bankat Lal Modi, R/o- Burning) mining project ( Modi Building,Sojat Road,Pali, M.L.No-110/1993) with State-Rajasthan,Eamil- enhancement of production [email protected] capacity from 6400 TPA (ROM) Name of the Consultant :-Sawai Singh to 2,70,000 TPA (ROM by lease Rajpurohit Shri Bankat Lal Modi located ,RQP/SME/Jodhpur/2014/01,(K.P.consulta near village Barna, Tehsil- nt) c/o Pramod kuwadia, Add-Shop No-3- Bilara, District -Jodhpur, 4, Basement, Utkarsh Plaza. Near Rajasthan (ML Area Sanischarji ka Than, Jodhpur(Raj). Email- 66.25hect.)-Transfer of file to [email protected] SEIAA reg. (P-50657) 22. 15587 ToR for Deriya & Bastua Project Proponent Name- M/S –Shri Sandstone Cluster Area, Plot Ram Singh Rathore S/O Shri Chatar Singh, No.28, (Plot Area – 1.00 hect) R/o-Nearby Deriya & Bastua Balesar Sata Near village –Deriya, Tehsil- Tehsil- Balesar, District-Jodhpur,Raj. Balesar, District- Jodhpur [email protected]. (Rajasthan) in favor of M/S – Consultant Name-M/S. N.S. ENVIRO- Shri Ram Singh Rathore S/O TECH LABORATORIES & Shri Chatar Singh.(Praposal no- CONSULTANT ,Add.-Plot No – A-8 30168) Neha Medical Building ,Opp.,ESI Hospital, Hasanpura Road, Sodala, Jaipur, [email protected] 23. 15588 ToR for Deriya & Bastua Project Proponent Name- Sandstone Cluster Area, Plot Shri jaina Ram S/O Shri Dungar Ram., No.77, (Plot Area – 1.00 hect) R/o-Nearby Deriya & Bastua, Tehsil- Near village –Deriya & Bastua, Balesar, District-Jodhpur,Raj. Email.-Not Tehsil- Balesar, District- Given Jodhpur (Rajasthan) in favor of Consultant Name-M/S. N.S. ENVIRO- M/S –Shri jaina Ram S/O Shri TECH LABORATORIES & Dungar Ram.(Praposal no- CONSULTANT ,Add.-Plot No – A-8 30127) Neha Medical Building ,Opp.,ESI Hospital, Hasanpura Road, Sodala, Jaipur, [email protected] Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

24. 15589 ToR for Deriya & Bastua Project Proponent Name- Sandstone Cluster Area, Plot Shri jaina Ram S/O Shri Dungar Ram., No.31, (Plot Area – 1.00 hect) R/o-Nearby Deriya & Bastua, Tehsil- Near village –Deriya & Bastua, Balesar, District-Jodhpur,Raj. Email- Tehsil- Balesar, District- [email protected]. Jodhpur (Rajasthan) in favor of Consultant Name-M/S. N.S. ENVIRO- M/S –Shri jaina Ram S/O Shri TECH LABORATORIES & Dungar Ram.(Praposal no- CONSULTANT ,Add.-Plot No – A-8 30144) Neha Medical Building ,Opp.,ESI Hospital, Hasanpura Road, Sodala, Jaipur, [email protected] 25. 15590 ToR for Deriya & Bastua Project Proponent Name- Shri Bhawani Sandstone Cluster Area, Plot Singh Rathore S/O Shri Chatar Singh, R/o- No.23, (Plot Area – 1.00 hect) Nearby Deriya Tehsil- Balesar, District- Near village –Deriya, Tehsil- Jodhpur,Raj. Email- Balesar, District- Jodhpur [email protected]. (Rajasthan) in favor of M/S – Consultant Name-M/S. N.S. ENVIRO- Shri Bhawani Singh Rathore TECH LABORATORIES & S/O Shri Chatar CONSULTANT ,Add.-Plot No – A-8 Singh.(Praposal no-30179) Neha Medical Building ,Opp.,ESI Hospital, Hasanpura Road, Sodala, Jaipur, [email protected] 26. 15591 ToR for Deriya & Bastua Project Proponent Name- Shri Natha Sandstone Cluster Area, Plot Ram S/O.Shri Dungar Ram, R/o-Nearby No.74, (Plot Area – 1.00 hect) Deriya Tehsil- Balesar, District- Near village –Deriya & Bastua, Jodhpur,Raj. Email- Tehsil- Balesar, District- [email protected]. Jodhpur (Rajasthan) in favor of Consultant Name-M/S. N.S. ENVIRO- M/S –Shri Natha Ram S/O Shri TECH LABORATORIES & Dungar Ram.(Praposal no- CONSULTANT ,Add.-Plot No – A-8 30269) Neha Medical Building ,Opp.,ESI Hospital, Hasanpura Road, Sodala, Jaipur, [email protected] 27. 15686 ToR for Daruda Masonary Stone Project Proponent Name- Madan Lal, Cluster Area, Plot No. 03, (Plot Station Road, Barmer, Tehsil & Dist. Area- 1.00 Hect.) Near Village- Barmer Rajasthan, Email. Daruda, Tehsil-Barmer, District- [email protected] Barmer (Raj.) in favor of M/s. Shri Madan Lal S/o Shri Consultant – M/s. N.S. Enviro-Tech Chaturbhuj Singhal, cluster Laboratories & Consultant, Add- Plot No area-34.94ha, (Praposal No- A-8 Neha Medical Building, Opp. ESI. 30519) Hospital, Hasanpura Road, Sodala, Email.- [email protected] 28. 15665 ToR for extension in validity of Project Proponent Name-M/S Jai Chand EC as per MoEF & CC Lal Daga,Add-Labhuju a Katra, 1st Floor , Notification,S.O No.1530 (E) bikaner, state Rajasthan, Email- Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

dsted 6th April 2018 for the Ball [email protected], Clay, Red &Yellow Ochre [email protected] Mining Project having (M.L.No. Name of the Consultant :-Fulgro 5/2003) located in village: Guda Environmental & Engineering Services , Tehsil: Kolayat, District: India Pvt. Ltd., Add-27,Ashok Vatika, Bikaner,Area- Khatipura Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur, Email- 98.0540ha.),khasra no- [email protected], 249,77/2,77/1,82. (P-29339) 29. 15666 ToR for extension in validity of P.P.Name- M/S Sampat Lal Daga,Add: Ist EC as per MoEF & Cc FloorLabhuji ka Katla, Bikaner, State- Notification ,S.O.No.1530 (E) Rajasthan ,Email- dated 6th April 2018 for the [email protected] Gudha Fire Clay mining Project Name of the Consultant :-Fulgro having (M.L-No-5/1996) Environmental & Engineering Services Located in village: Gudha, India Pvt. Ltd., Add-27,Ashok Vatika, Tehsil: Kolayat, District- Khatipura Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur, Email- Bikaner.Area-82.25hect.Khasra [email protected] no- Website:www.fulgro.in 2,3,4,5,6,7,21,22,23,37,39,24,25, 26,27,34,35,36,77,38,72,73,74,7 5,76,78,404,65/1. (P-29344) 30. 15717 ToR for existing “Abhaypura Project Proponent Name- RAJASTHAN Soapstone Mine (ML No.:- MINERAL & Company Authorized 30/1986 ; R- 10/1996)” Catering Signatory: Sh. Anand Rajgarhia (Partner & of Rajasthan Mineral & POA Holder) , 25, Hanuman Nagar, Post Company having production – Vaishali, Jaipur , Rajasthan , Email. – capacity of 39,000 TPA of [email protected] Soapstone situated at Village – Consultant – ENKAY ENVIRO Abhaypura, Tehsil – Jahazpur, SERVICES PVT. LTD. , 92 Heera Nagar – distt.- Bhilwara, Rajasthan, for A, Near Shalimar Bagh, Ajmer Road, an area of 34.113 Ha. as per Jaipur, Rajasthan, Email. – Gazette Notification dated [email protected] 06.04.2018. Khasra no- 232,233,234,235,236,237,238. (Praposal No-29382) 31. 15725 ToR for existing “Handla- Project Proponent Name- Daulat Singh Bhatian Ball Clay, Fire Clay, & Sons Authorized Signatory : - Mr. Red. Clay and Yellow Ochre Ranjeet Singh (Authorized Signatory) R/o Mine (Ml No. 45/05) of Daulat 151, Gandhi Nagar, Bikaner Distt. singh & Sons having production Bikaner, (Raj.) Email. capacity of 50,000 TPA situated [email protected] at Village- Handia- Bhatian, Consultant – ENKAY ENVIRO Tehsil- Kolayat, Distt.- Bikaner, SERVICES PVT. LTD., 92 Heera Nagar- (Raj.) for an area of 95.99177 A, Near Shalimar Bagh, Ajmer Road, Ha. as per Gazatted Notification Jaipur(Raj.) Email.- dated 06.04.2018. (Praposal [email protected] Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

No-29358)

32. 15559 EC.for Quartz, Feldspar & Mica Proponent Name :- M/s.Jain Minerals. Mining Lease M.L.no. 06/78, Add:- 36, kothi, Jaipur Road, 13/2001® Area 7.88Ha. Ajmer (Raj) Email:- [email protected] Production Capacity of Quartz, Name of the Consultant :- TM Enviro Feldspar & Mica(Rom) 14820 Consultancy Services Tonnes per annum (Quartz 4683 TPA , Feldspar 7114 TPA, & Mica 59 TPA ) at near village- Gulgaon, Tehsil:- Malpura, District :- Tonk Rajasthan. (Praposal no-83833) 33. 15560 EC.for Quartz, Feldspar & Proponent Name :- M/s Rajasthan Mining Lease M.L.no. 06/80, Minerals Supply Works Smt. Kanta Jain 22/01® Area 19.0Ha., Khasra W/o. Late Shri Mahavir Chand Jain Add:- no. not given Production H.NO. 75, Anupam Ashok Marg, Ajmer E- Capacity of 4000 TPA at near Mail:- [email protected] village- Kishanpura, Tehsil:- Name of the Consultant :- TM Enviro Beawer, District :- Ajmer Consultancy Services (Rajasthan.)(Praposal no- 76012) 34. 15581 EC for " Quartz, Feldspar , Proponent Name :- M/s Mining & Emerald & Beryl Mining Lease Mineral Industries (Prop. Sh. Arvind (ML NO. 07/93, ML Area Kumar Sethi S/o. Sh. HukumChand Sethi) 46.32ha.Production Capcity - Add:- 36, Kishangarh kothi jaipur Road Quartz; 18000 TPA, Feldspar ; Ajmer (Raj) Email:- [email protected] 2000 TPA Near Village - Name of the Consultant :- TM Enviro Rajgarh, Tehsil- Nasirabad, Consultancy Services District - Ajmer , Rajasthan of M/s Mining & Mineral Industries (Prop. Sh. Arvind Kumar Sethi .(Praposal no- 81545) 35. 15595 ToR for (Form I along with pre Project Proponent Name-M/S Jai Feasibility Report) of Mining Minerals & Industries ,R/O-03, Dhan Project of Soapstone Mine, Mandi, Udaipur (Raj), M.L.No-02/1988, comprising [email protected]. area of 47.96 Hectares near Consultant Name-R.K.Consultants, R/O- Village Dewal, Tehsil & 17 Dungarpur in Rajasthan. E/777,CHB,JODHPUR,(RAJASTHAN), Khasara No-10904/1452 [email protected] Praposal No-29967) 36. 15650 ToR for Mining Project of P.P. Name- M/S Radhey Chemicals ,R/o- Limestone Mine , M.L.No-47/80 Ground Floor, Jodhpur Tower, Dharam & R.L.No-195/90, comprising Narayan ji ka Hatha, Paota, Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

Area-100 Hect., Near village Jodhpur,Email- Borunda, Tehsil- Bilara, [email protected] District-Jodhpur in Rajasthan. Name of the Consultant :- M/S (Praposal No-30600) R.K.Consultants , 17E/777,C.H.B,Jodhpur- Rajasthan,Email- [email protected] 37. 124 Submission of Application for P.P. Name- Shri Ummed Singh, Add- EC ( Form I Along with pre Village & Post-Khangta, Tehsil- Feasibility Report) of Mining Bhopalgarh, District-Jodhpur (Raj),Email- Project of Sandstone Mine with [email protected], Crusher, M.L.No- Name of the Consultant :- M/S 02/2007,comprising Area R.K.Consultants , 17E/777,C.H.B,Jodhpur- 22.793hect. near Village- Rajasthan,Email- Bhuteshwar ki Gal (Choukari), [email protected] Tehsil-Bhopalgarh,District- Jodhpur in Rajasthan. (P-90286) 38. 15525 ToR for Mining Project of Proponent Name :- M/s. PP Enterprises Siliceous Earth Mine, M.L.no. Add:- Saturday shopee, E-Sector, Shastri 02/85, comprising area of 51.03 nagar, Kalpataru Shopping Centre, Jodhpur he.Production capacity 9360 (Raj.) E-mail:- TPA Khasra no. not given Near [email protected] village - Murad ki Dhani, Tehsil- Name of the consultant :- R.K. Sheo, Dist- Barmer ,Raj. Consultants (NABET Accredited (Praposal no-29334) consultant Organization), Add- 17 E/403 C.H.B, Jodhpur (Raj.) Email:- [email protected] 39. 15526 ToR for Mining Project of Soap Project Proponent - M/s Singh Mining stone, Mining project of M/s Company Add: - Opposite Bhagyodaua Vijai Singh Khimesara (Now- Hotel, N.H. -8- Badla, Tehsil- Kherwara, M/s Singh Mining Company) District - Udaipur (Raj.) Email- Located in village- Jhunthri, [email protected] tehsil - Kherwara, District - Consultant:- R.K. Consultants (NABET Udaipur (M.L. No- 1/1996), Accredited consultant Organization), Add- Area 24.17 hectare Production 17 E/403 C.H.B, Jodhpur (Raj.) Email:- Capacity - 40,000 TPA Khasra [email protected] No. not given.(Praposal no- 80544) 40. 15461 Environmental Clearance for Name of proponent – Sh. Bhagat singh Sandstone Quarry, QL No. 19 , s/o sujan singh Jat R/o-38, Sharma Colony, area 0.18 hect khasra no-nil, 22, Godam Ward No. 16, Tehsil&District- near village Balesar , Tehsil- jaipur [email protected] Baleser, District – Jodhpur in NAME OF CONSULTANT-: Rajasthan. Production capacity- R.K.CONSULTANTS (nabet accredited 1800 TPA(Praposal no-72783) consultant organization ) 17E/403, C.H.B, JODHPUR E-mail- [email protected] Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

41. 15462 Environmental Clearance for Name of proponent – sh. Bhagat singh Sandstone Quarry, QL No. 28 , s/o sujan singh Jat R/o-38, Sharma Colony, area 0.18 hect khasra no-nil, 22, Godam Ward No. 16, Tehsil&District- near village Balesar , Tehsil- jaipur [email protected] Baleser, District – Jodhpur in NAME OF CONSULTANT-: Rajasthan. Production capacity- R.K.CONSULTANTS (nabet accredited 1800 TPA.(Praposal no-72782) consultant organization ) 17E/403, C.H.B, JODHPUR E-mail- [email protected] 42. 15463 Environmental Clearance for Name of proponent – Renu singh D/O Sandstone Quarry, QL No. 30 , Mahaveer Singh Jat R/o-38, Sharma area 0.18 hect khasra no-nil, Colony, 22, Godam Ward No. 16, near village Balesar , Tehsil- Tehsil&District- jaipur Email- Baleser, District – Jodhpur in [email protected] Rajasthan. Production capacity- NAME OF CONSULTANT-: 1800 TPA.(Praposal no-72793) R.K.CONSULTANTS (nabet accredited consultant organization ) 17E/403, C.H.B, JODHPUR E-mail- [email protected] 43. 15464 Environmental Clearance for Name of proponent – – Renu singh Sandstone Quarry, QL No. 18 , D/O Mahaveer Singh Jat Add - 38, Sharma area 0.18 hect khasra no-nil, Colony, 22, Godam Ward No. 16, near village Balesar , Tehsil- Tehsil&District- jaipur Email- Baleser, District – Jodhpur in [email protected] Rajasthan. Production capacity- NAME OF CONSULTANT-: 1800 TPA.(Praposal no-72835) R.K.CONSULTANTS (nabet accredited consultant organization ) 17E/403, C.H.B, JODHPUR E-mail- [email protected] 44. 15465 Environmental Clearance for Name of proponent – Sh.Sujan Singh Jat Sandstone Quarry, QL No. 34 , S/O-Samandar Singh Jat R/o-Virharu, area 0.18 hect khasra No.- nil, Tehsil- Kumhare, District- Bharatpur E- near village Balesar , Tehsil- mail- [email protected] Baleser, District – Jodhpur in NAME OF CONSULTANT-: Rajasthan. Production capacity- R.K.CONSULTANTS (nabet accredited 1800 TPA.(Praposal no-72813) consultant organization ) 17E/403, C.H.B, JODHPUR E-mail- [email protected] 45. 15466 Environmental Clearance for Name of proponent – sh. Bhagat singh Sandstone Quarry, QL No. 33 , s/o sujan singh Jat R/o-38, Sharma Colony, area 0.18 hect khasra No.- nil, 22, Godam Ward No. 16, Tehsil&District- near village Balesar , Tehsil- jaipur [email protected] Baleser, District – Jodhpur in NAME OF CONSULTANT-: Rajasthan. Production capacity- R.K.CONSULTANTS (nabet accredited 1800 TPA.(Praposal no-72785) consultant organization ) 17E/403, C.H.B, JODHPUR E-mail- Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

[email protected] 46. 15467 Environmental Clearance for Name of proponent – Rajendra Kumar Sandstone Quarry, QL No. 08 , Jain S/o Bhanwar Lal Jain R/O-D-25 Lal area 0.18 hect khasra No.- nil, Bahadur Nagar,Malviya Nagar, near village Balesar , Tehsil- Tehsil&District- jaipur Email- Baleser, District – Jodhpur in [email protected] Rajasthan. Production capacity- NAME OF CONSULTANT-: 1800 TPA.(Praposal no-72791) R.K.CONSULTANTS (nabet accredited consultant organization ) 17E/403, C.H.B, JODHPUR E-mail- [email protected] 47. 15535 Expansion in production Project Proponent - M/S NINATH Capacity of Girota Silica Sand SILICA, Near Bus Stand, Opposite (Minor Mineral) Mining Project, Prabhat Loan Agra Road, Dausa, ( ML No. 02/93), Area:- 8.645 Corresponded Address- Shri Rajesh ha, Production Capacity :- Bhardwaj, Add- 528, Alankar Plaza, 30,000 TPA, to 3,68,780 TPA Central Spine, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Distt.- Silica Sand & 1,12,890 TPA, Jaipur, (Raj.), Email:- Khasra No.104 old, 134,new, & [email protected] Name of 195 old, 278 new, Add:- the Consultants:- Vardan Environet Village -Girota, Tehsil- Sakrai, Add:- D-142, sushant lok IIIrd Gurugram Distt. - ,Dausa, (Raj.) (Praposal no-80318) 48. 15531 E. C. for Samod Silica Sand Project Proponent – M/S Mahalaxmi Mining Project (ML.NO. Minerals, Add- Thandi Piyoo, Tripoliya 02/1996), Area:-12.439 Ha. Bazar, Distt.- Jaipur, (Raj.), Email:- Annual Production :- 32,500 [email protected], TPA, Khasra No. – Not given, Consultants:- ENVIRTA Environment Village – Samod, Tehsil- Chomu Consulting & Research Organization, As , Distt. – Jaipur, (Raj.)(Praposal per QCI NABET ‘ List of Accredited no-81478) Consultant Organizations/ Rev. 28/ Dec. 05, 2015’, listed in as Accredited Consultant, Category ‘A’ SI. No. 47 49 15703 Environmental Clearance of Project Proponent Name- M/s Khangar Khet Masonry Stone & DHARTIPUTRA MINES, Limestone Mine with Crusher ( R/o 143 -B, Aadarsh Nagar, Distt.- Pali, M.L. No. 03/1995) Mining Rajasthan, Lease Area: 4.60 Hect. Located Email.- [email protected] near Village- Khangar Khet, Tehsil- Raipur, Distt.– Pali, Rajasthan, (Proposal No-93008)

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

Agenda no. 1 File no. F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project /Cat. 8(b)B1 (15772)/ 2019-20

Project Name:- ToR application for the development of “Industrial Area Project, Tehsil- Sardarshahar Ext., Distt.- Churu, Rajasthan, By M/s RIICO , Khasra No. 196/1, 198, 200/1, 202/1 (Praposal No. – 75626)

Project Proponent:- RIICO Ltd., Add-Udyog Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Email- [email protected] Consultant Name:- GRASS ROOTS RESEARCH & CREATION INDIA (P) LTD. F – 374- 375, Sector-63, Noida, U.P. Email- [email protected], [email protected]

Observations of the committee:- M/s Rajasthan State Industial Development and Investment Corporation has applied for ToR for proposed Industrial Estate Project at Sardarshar (Ext.) district Churu having total plot area 214.562 acres (86.830 hectares). No project covered under category A & B as specified in schedule attached with EIA 2006 is proposed to be established in the proposed industrial area. Since the project area is less than 500 hectare but contains building and construction projects more than 20000 Sq. meter and or development area more than 50 hectare, it will be treated as activity listed at 8(b) of the Scheduled to the EIA notification. Resolution:

Keeping in view the information contained in the documents and presentation made by the PP, the SEAC prescribed the following ToR without public hearing as the project is exempted from public consultation under Clause III. Stage (3) (d). The PP shall carry out One Season EIA as per the EIA notification 2006.

Specific ToR:

1) Examine details of land use as per Master Plan and land use around 10 km radius of the project site. Analysis should be made based on latest satellite imagery for land use with raw images. Check on flood plain of any river.

2) Submit details of environmentally sensitive places, land acquisition status, rehabilitation of communities/villages and present status of such activities.

3) Examine baseline environmental quality along with projected incremental load due to the project.

4) Environmental data to be considered in relation to the project development would be (a) land, (b)

groundwater, (c) surface water, (d) air, (e) bio-diversity, (f) noise and vibrations, (g) socio economic and health.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

5) Submit a copy of the contour plan with slopes, drainage pattern of the site and surrounding area. Any obstruction of the same by the project

6) Submit the details of the trees to be felled for the project.

7) Submit the present land use and permission required for any conversion such as forest, agriculture etc.

8) Submit Roles and responsibility of the developer etc for compliance of environmental regulations

under the provisions of EP Act.

9) Ground water classification as per the Central Ground Water Authority.

10) Examine the details of Source of water, water requirement, use of treated waste water and prepare a water balance chart.

11) Rain water harvesting proposals should be made with due safeguards for ground water quality.

Maximize recycling of water and utilization of rain water.

12) Examine soil characteristics and depth of ground water table for rainwater harvesting.

13) Examine details of solid waste generation treatment and its disposal.

14) Examine and submit details of use of solar energy and alternative source of energy to reduce the fossil energy consumption. Energy conservation and energy efficiency.

15) DG sets are likely to be used during construction and operational phase of the project. Emissions from DG sets must be taken into consideration while estimating the impacts on air environment.

16) Examine road/rail connectivity to the project site and impact on the traffic due to the proposed project. Present and future traffic and transport facilities for the region should be analysed for preventing traffic congestion and providing faster trouble free system to reach different destinations in the city.

17) A detailed traffic and transportation study should be made for existing and projected passenger and cargo traffic.

18) Examine the details of transport of materials for construction which should include source and availability.

19) Examine separately the details for construction and operation phases both for Environmental Management Plan and Environmental Monitoring Plan with cost and parameters.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

20) Submit details of a comprehensive Disaster Management Plan including emergency evacuation during natural and man-made disaster.

21) Details of litigation pending against the project, if any, with direction /order passed by any Court of Law against the Project should be given.

22) The cost of the Project (capital cost and recurring cost) as well as the cost towards implementationof EMP should be clearly spelt out.

23) Any further clarification on carrying out the above studies including anticipated impacts due to the project and mitigative measure, project proponent can refer to the model ToR available on Ministry.

General ToR:

1. The validity period of this ToRs letter would be for a period of three years from the date of dispatch of the ToRs letter.

2. Examine and provide details relating the impact on infrastructure like water supply, storm water drainage, sewerage power, etc., and the disposal of treated/raw wastes from the park on land/water body and into sewerage system.

3. Collection of one season (non-monsoon) primary baseline data on ambient air quality, water quality, noise level, soil and flora and fauna. Ambient Air quality should be determined by

measuring the concentration of parameters like P.M.2.5, P.M.10, SO2, NOx according to the latest standards prescribed by CPCB. Site-specific meteorological data should also be collected. The location of the monitoring stations (minimum 6) should be justified. Date wise collected baseline AAQ data should form part of EIA and EMP report. The monitoring shall be carried out by CPCB/NABL/ MOEF/GoR approved laboratory and copy of the analysis report should be submitted.

4. Study the socio-economic conditions of the project area and its surroundings and their impact on the project design and operation.

5. Study the existing flora and fauna of the area and the impact of the project on them should be submitted along with detailed listing of vegetation.

6. Study the hydrological and geo-hydrological conditions of the project area. Include a contour plan indicating slopes and showing drainage pattern and outfall.

7. Examine and submit details about the resettlement and rehabilitation of project-affected persons in the nearby villages, in accordance with the national resettlement and rehabilitation policy.

8. Submit development strategy of the area.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

9. Provide relevant Elevation and conceptual plan of the area.

10. Storm water drainage details and outfall may be described. Rainwater harvesting proposals should be made with due safeguards for ground water quality Maximize recycling of water and utilization of rainwater.

11. Water balance taking into account the population projection residents and the sources of water using the reduced water consumption as given in the Manual on norms and standards for EC of large construction projects. Also give water requirements for DG sets, air conditioning system etc. Commitment regarding availability of requisite quantity of water from the competent authority. Also provide account of reuse and re-circulation of effluents.

12. Provide water supply system design (taking care of the dual plumbing).

13. Budgetary provision shall be made for the housing of construction labor within the site with all necessary infrastructure and facilities such as health facility, sanitation facility, fuel for cooking, along with safe drinking water, medical camps, and toilets for women, crèche for infants. The housing may be in the form of temporary structures to be removed after the completion of the project.

14. Details regarding Occupational health impact of the project should be provided. Health study in the surrounding area be carried out covering information regarding prevailing diseases, mortality rate etc. Health and Safety Plan should be prepared and submitted.

15. Examine soil characteristics, topography, rain fall pattern and soil erosion. Ground water recharge pits to be suitably proposed as per MoEF guidelines.

16. Application of renewable energy/alternate energy, such as solar energy, wind energy may be described. Quantify the amount of non conventional energy used, day light utilization, solar component etc

17. Risk assessment and disaster management plan be prepared which should include flood fighting with cost estimation and relevant budgetary provision.

18. Detailed fire fighting plan along with the locations and capacity of the water hydrants.

19. Identification of recyclable wastes and waste utilization arrangements may be made.

20. Explore possibility of generating biogas from decomposable wastes. Provide details and capacity of organic converters. Provide locations and size of composting area

21. Arrangements for hazardous waste management (if any) may be described.

22. Give electrical design including various loads, DG, transformer selection etc. Provide details of the DG sets also giving details of Eco- friendly DG sets. Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

23. Common facilities for waste collection, treatment, recycling and disposal (all effluent, emission and refuse including MSW, biomedical and hazardous wastes).

24. Traffic management and circulation plan including parking and loading/unloading areas may be described. Traffic survey should be carried out on weekdays and weekend.

25. Make provision of green belt as a measure for mitigation of dust and noise and buffer between habitation and industry.

26. EMP should include technical and institutional aspects for pre-treatment by constituent units and cost of EMP should be properly worked out and appropriate funds should be allocated.

27. Use of local building materials should be described. The provisions of Fly Ash Notification should be kept in view.

28. Green belt should be developed in 33% of total area landscape plan green belts and open spaces may be described. Provide a horticulture plan with percentage of green cover given, type of plantation taking into account both local species and biodiversity.

29. Environmental Management Plan should be accompanied with Environmental Monitoring Plan and environmental cost and benefit assessment.

30. Examine separately the details for construction and operation phases both for Environmental Management Plan and Environmental Monitoring Plan.

31. The P.P. will carry out proper Socio-economic survey of the villages situated in the study area. Based upon its findings and keeping in view the felt needs of local populations, the P.P. will provide adequate budget for carrying out CER activities. The proposal should contain provision for toilets for girls in near by schools.

32. A voluntary commitment of the Social responsibility activities to be undertaken by the project proponent is to be given and the budgeted amount proposed for such activity will be kept. Refer enclosed annexure -1

33. Provide for conservation of resources, energy efficiency and use of renewable sources of energy in the light of ESBC code.

34. Make assessment of any regulatory measure in view of the environmental and social impacts of the project (such as unauthorized development around the township).

35. Any litigation pending against the project and /or any direction /order passed by any Court of Law against the project, if so, details thereof.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

36. The P.P. should ensure compliance of the order of the Hon’ble Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur, in D. B. Civil writ petition no. 1536 of 2003 in the matter of Abdul Rahman vs State of Rajasthan and others and submit detail report.

37. The impact of the project on land use including change of course of water, if any should be given. Also Impact on topography, drainage, agricultural fields, cattle fields, wildlife, water logging leading to water borne diseases, if any. It may also be shown whether it will lead to change of watercourse of the river. Modeling exercise should also be carried out through an expert agency to show the change in river flow dynamics, if any.

38. Details of construction activity including date of starting of construction work and investment incurred till date along with photographs and in case of industries / mining, the quantity of products produced so far, should be essentially mentioned by the PP / Consultant.

39. A separate chapter on compliance to the environmental clearance conditions and / or the NOC / consent from the Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board should be submitted. The testing/ verification undertaken for the compliance should be from the recognized environmental laboratory.

40. Used filter papers (Air monitoring) along with photographs of the site showing Air / Water sampling / monitoring activity / equipment used at each station should be submitted. Original copies of analysis report of all the relevant data referred in the documents should be enclosed.

41. Following information regarding the work order/agreement issued by the P.P. to the consultant (Accredited from QCI/ NABET for proposed project Sector) should be submitted:-

a. Dispatch No. of the work order/agreement.

b. Date of issue of work order.

c. Date of start of air/water/other monitoring work (as applicable)

d. Postal address/ Email Address/ Fax Number/ Mobile Number and Landline Number of the P.P.

Points included in TOR as per MoEF circular no. J-11013/41/2006-IA.II(I)-Pt. dt. 19.05.2011 regarding Corporate Environmental Responsibility.

1. Does the company have a well laid down Environment Policy approved by its Board of Directors? If so, it may be detailed in the EIA report.

2. Does the Environment Policy prescribed for standard operating process/procedures to bring into focus any infringement/deviation/violation of the Environmental or forest norms /conditions? If so, it may be detailed in the EIA report.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

3. What is the hierarchical system or administrative order of the company to deal with the Environmental issues and for ensuring compliance with the EC conditions? Details of this system may be given.

4. Does the company have a system of reporting of non-compliances/violations of Environmental norms to the Board of Directors of the company and /or shareholders or stakeholders at large? This reporting mechanism should be detailed in the EIA report.

In the final EIA /EMP report , compliance of points of ToRs should be reported point wise in a statement of three columns as indicated below:-

S. No Items in the letter of the ToRs Reply / Response by the PP

Agenda no. 2 File no. F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project / Cat. 8(a)B2 (15734)/ 2019-20

Project Name :- ToR for "Archi Royal City" proposed commercial & Group Housing Project by M/S Archi Civil Construction Pvt. Ltd. at plot no.1 (At Khasra No. 1454/1, 1458/1,1462/1,1459,1460), Dholi Magri (Bedwas) , Girwa, Udaipur, Rajasthan. (Proposal No- 85142).

Proponent name :- M/S Archi Civil Construction Pvt. Ltd., Address-Ground Floor, Archi Building, 100 ft Road Towards DPS Near Shobagpura Circle, Udaipur, Email- [email protected]

Consultant Name:- TEAM Institute of Science & Technology Pvt. Ltd. E-65, Chitranjan marg, , C-Scheme, Jaipur. [email protected],

Observations of the committee:- The consultant for the PP was present during presentation. The SEAC noted that the PP has not submitted documents relating to the project to the members. The PP has, however, submitted the same in the SEAC, Office. The consultant of the PP vide letter dated 27.05.2019 has requested to allow the PP to present his case on 28.05.2019 while mentioning that his case of one of violation. The SEAC considerd the request of the consultant and allowed the PP to present its case on 28.05.2019. The PP also circulated the papers relating to their case to the members during the meeting on 27.05.2019. The PP and consultatnt appeared before SEAC and made presentation of their case on 28.05.2019. Sh. Rishab Bhanawat, Director and authorized signatory of the PP namely M/s Archi Civil Construction Pvt. Ltd has submitted affidavit dated 27.05.2019 wherein it is stated that the total builtup area constructed at site is approximately 4000 Sq.meter and has admitted that their case is one of violation of the EIA notification, 2006 as amended to date. This being a case of

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

violation has to be dealt in accordance with the MoEF & CC notification dated 14.03.2017 and 08.03.2018 and the OM dated 16.03.2018 of the MoEF & CC. Resolution:

Keeping in view the information contained in the documents and records, the SEAC prescribed the following ToRs in terms of the said notification dated 14.03.2017 and 08.03.2018 read with OM dated 16.03.2018 of the MoEF & CC related to cases of violation, with public hearing while carrying out One Season EIA as per the EIA notification 2006.

SPECIFIC ToR :

i) The PP shall undertake assessment of ecological damage, remediation plan and natural and community resource augmentation plan. Such plan shall be prepared as an independent chapter in the Environment Impact Assessment report. The report shall be prepared by the accredited consultant. The collection and analyses of data for assessment of ecological damage, preparation of remediation plan and natural and community resource plan shall be done by an environmental laboratory duly notified under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 or an environmental Laboratory, accredited by the National Accreditation Board for Testing and Calibration Laboratories or a Laboratory of the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research Institution working in the field of environment.

ii) The Environment Management Plan shall comprise remediation plan and natural and community resource augmentation plan corresponding to ecological damage assessed and economic benefit derived due to violation.

iii) The PP shall undertake Final Environment Impact Assessment and prepare Final Environment Management Plan after conducting Public Hearing.

iv) The PP shall be required to submit a bank guarantee equivalent to the amount of remediation plan and natural and community resource augmentation plan with the State Pollution Control Board and the PP shall deposit the bank guarantee prior to the grant of Environmental Clearance and which shall be released after successful implementation of the remediation plan and natural and community resource augmentation plan and after recommendation by Regional Office of the Ministry, State Level Expert Appraisal Committee and approval of SEIAA.

v) The PP who has committed violation of the EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006 shall be governed by the public consultation in the parent notification as per the directions dated 14.3.2018 of the Hon’ble Madras High Court in the matter of WIVIP Nos. 3361 and 3362 of 2018 and WMP No. 3721 of 2018 in WP No. 11189 of 2017 and the Office Memorandum dated 16.3.2018 of the MoEF & CC GoI. Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

vi) Public Hearing: The PP shall get the Public hearing conducted in terms of the OM dated 16.3.2018 of the MoEF & CC. After preparing the draft EIA (as per the generic structure prescribed in Appendix-III of the EIA Notification, 2006 and as amended), the proponent shall get the public hearing conducted (strictly following the procedure laid down in the Appendix IV of the Amendment Notification dt. 01.12.2009 and MoEF circular no. J-15012/29/2010/IA.II(M) dt. 19.04.2010). In this regard due care would be taken in (i) deciding the venue of public hearing (at the project site or in its closed proximity, to ensure widest possible public participation), (ii) forwarding the Draft EIA Reports with Executive Summary Reports and notice for hearing to various authorities / offices, specifically to Urban Local Bodies/ Panchayati Raj. Institutions (i.e Zila Parishad, Panchayat Samiti & Gram Panchayat)/ Development Authorities (i.e. U.I.T., J.D.A. etc.), (iii) adequate publicity regarding date, place and time of public hearing among local public, (iv) recording requisite “certificate” at the end of public hearing proceedings / report and (v) displaying the report in the office of Gram Panchayat, Zila Parishad, Collectorate etc. After completing the public hearing process as described above, the proponent shall take further necessary action for obtaining environmental clearance in accordance with the procedure prescribed under the EIA Notification, 2006 and amendments made thereafter. A certificate should be submitted by the Regional Officer Pollution Control Board that the process followed for public hearing was adequate as required in reference to contents of MoEF O.M. no. J-15012/29/2010-IA-II(M) dt. 19.04.2010

General ToRs:

1. The validity period of this ToRs letter would be for a period of three years from the date of dispatch of the ToRs letter.

2. Examine and provide details relating the impact on infrastructure like water supply, storm water drainage, sewerage power, etc., and the disposal of treated/raw wastes from the park on land/water body and into sewerage system.

3. Collection of one season (non-monsoon) primary baseline data on ambient air quality, water quality, noise level, soil and flora and fauna. Ambient Air quality should be

determined by measuring the concentration of parameters like P.M.2.5, P.M.10, SO2, NOx according to the latest standards prescribed by CPCB. Site-specific meteorological data should also be collected. The location of the monitoring stations (minimum 6) should be justified. Date wise collected baseline AAQ data should form part of EIA and EMP report. The monitoring shall be carried out by CPCB/NABL/ MOEF/GoR approved laboratory and copy of the analysis report should be submitted.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

4. Study the socio-economic conditions of the project area and its surroundings and their impact on the project design and operation.

5. Study the existing flora and fauna of the area and the impact of the project on them should be submitted along with detailed listing of vegetation.

6. Study the hydrological and geo-hydrological conditions of the project area. Include a contour plan indicating slopes and showing drainage pattern and outfall.

7. Examine and submit details about the resettlement and rehabilitation of project- affected persons in the nearby villages, in accordance with the national resettlement and rehabilitation policy.

8. Submit development strategy of the area.

9. Provide relevant Elevation and conceptual plan of the area.

10. Storm water drainage details and outfall may be described. Rainwater harvesting proposals should be made with due safeguards for ground water quality Maximize recycling of water and utilization of rainwater.

11. Water balance taking into account the population projection residents and the sources of water using the reduced water consumption as given in the Manual on norms and standards for EC of large construction projects. Also give water requirements for DG sets, air conditioning system etc. Commitment regarding availability of requisite quantity of water from the competent authority. Also provide account of reuse and re- circulation of effluents.

12. Provide water supply system design (taking care of the dual plumbing).

13. Budgetary provision shall be made for the housing of construction labor within the site with all necessary infrastructure and facilities such as health facility, sanitation facility, fuel for cooking, along with safe drinking water, medical camps, and toilets for women, crèche for infants. The housing may be in the form of temporary structures to be removed after the completion of the project.

14. Details regarding Occupational health impact of the project should be provided. Health study in the surrounding area be carried out covering information regarding prevailing diseases, mortality rate etc. Health and Safety Plan should be prepared and submitted.

15. Examine soil characteristics, topography, rain fall pattern and soil erosion. Ground water recharge pits to be suitably proposed as per MoEF guidelines.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

16. Application of renewable energy/alternate energy, such as solar energy, wind energy may be described. Quantify the amount of non conventional energy used, day light utilization, solar component etc

17. Risk assessment and disaster management plan be prepared which should include flood fighting with cost estimation and relevant budgetary provision.

18. Detailed fire fighting plan along with the locations and capacity of the water hydrants.

19. Identification of recyclable wastes and waste utilization arrangements may be made.

20. Explore possibility of generating biogas from decomposable wastes. Provide details and capacity of organic converters. Provide locations and size of composting area

21. Arrangements for hazardous waste management (if any) may be described.

22. Give electrical design including various loads, DG, transformer selection etc. Provide details of the DG sets also giving details of Eco- friendly DG sets.

23. Common facilities for waste collection, treatment, recycling and disposal (all effluent, emission and refuse including MSW, biomedical and hazardous wastes).

24. Traffic management and circulation plan including parking and loading/unloading areas may be described. Traffic survey should be carried out on weekdays and weekend.

25. Make provision of green belt as a measure for mitigation of dust and noise and buffer between habitation and industry.

26. EMP should include technical and institutional aspects for pre-treatment by constituent units and cost of EMP should be properly worked out and appropriate funds should be allocated.

27. Use of local building materials should be described. The provisions of Fly Ash Notification should be kept in view.

28. Green belt should be developed in 33% of total area landscape plan green belts and open spaces may be described. Provide a horticulture plan with percentage of green cover given, type of plantation taking into account both local species and biodiversity.

29. Environmental Management Plan should be accompanied with Environmental Monitoring Plan and environmental cost and benefit assessment.

30. Examine separately the details for construction and operation phases both for Environmental Management Plan and Environmental Monitoring Plan.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

31. The P.P. will carry out proper Socio-economic survey of the villages situated in the study area. Based upon its findings and keeping in view the felt needs of local populations, the P.P. will provide adequate budget for carrying out CER activities. The proposal should contain provision for toilets for girls in near by schools.

32. A voluntary commitment of the Social responsibility activities to be undertaken by the project proponent is to be given and the budgeted amount proposed for such activity will be kept. Refer enclosed annexure -1

33. Provide for conservation of resources, energy efficiency and use of renewable sources of energy in the light of ESBC code.

34. Make assessment of any regulatory measure in view of the environmental and social impacts of the project (such as unauthorized development around the township).

35. Any litigation pending against the project and /or any direction /order passed by any Court of Law against the project, if so, details thereof.

36. The P.P. should ensure compliance of the order of the Hon’ble Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur, in D. B. Civil writ petition no. 1536 of 2003 in the matter of Abdul Rahman vs State of Rajasthan and others and submit detail report.

37. The impact of the project on land use including change of course of water, if any should be given. Also Impact on topography, drainage, agricultural fields, cattle fields, wildlife, water logging leading to water borne diseases, if any. It may also be shown whether it will lead to change of watercourse of the river. Modeling exercise should also be carried out through an expert agency to show the change in river flow dynamics, if any.

38. Details of construction activity including date of starting of construction work and investment incurred till date along with photographs and in case of industries / mining, the quantity of products produced so far, should be essentially mentioned by the PP / Consultant.

39. A separate chapter on compliance to the environmental clearance conditions and / or the NOC / consent from the Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board should be submitted. The testing/ verification undertaken for the compliance should be from the recognized environmental laboratory.

40. Used filter papers (Air monitoring) along with photographs of the site showing Air / Water sampling / monitoring activity / equipment used at each station should be

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

submitted. Original copies of analysis report of all the relevant data referred in the documents should be enclosed.

41. Following information regarding the work order/agreement issued by the P.P. to the consultant (Accredited from QCI/ NABET for proposed project Sector) should be submitted:-

a. Dispatch No. of the work order/agreement.

b. Date of issue of work order.

c. Date of start of air/water/other monitoring work (as applicable)

d. Postal address/ Email Address/ Fax Number/ Mobile Number and Landline Number of the P.P.

Points included in TOR as per MoEF circular no. J-11013/41/2006-IA.II(I)-Pt. dt. 19.05.2011 regarding Corporate Environmental Responsibility.

1. Does the company have a well laid down Environment Policy approved by its Board of Directors? If so, it may be detailed in the EIA report.

2. Does the Environment Policy prescribed for standard operating process/procedures to bring into focus any infringement/deviation/violation of the Environmental or forest norms /conditions? If so, it may be detailed in the EIA report.

3. What is the hierarchical system or administrative order of the company to deal with the Environmental issues and for ensuring compliance with the EC conditions? Details of this system may be given.

Does the company have a system of reporting of non-compliances/violations of Environmental norms to the Board of Directors of the company and /or shareholders or stakeholders at large? This reporting mechanism should be detailed in the EIA report.

Specific ToRs applicable in the cases of violation in terms of the Notification dated 14.3.2017 and 8.3.2018 and OMs dated 30.5.2018, 4.7.2018 of the MoEF&CC :

i) The PP/Consultant is required to give details of violations of the EIA notification through affidavit in the specified format. ii) The PP shall undertake assessment of ecological damage, remediation plan and natural and community resource augmentation plan. Such plan shall be prepared as an independent chapter in the Environment Impact Assessment report. The report shall be prepared by the accredited consultant. The collection and analyses of data for

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

assessment of ecological damage, preparation of remediation plan and natural and community resource plan shall be done by an environmental laboratory duly notified under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 or an environmental Laboratory, accredited by the National Accreditation Board for Testing and Calibration Laboratories or a Laboratory of the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research Institution working in the field of environment. iii) The Environment Management Plan shall comprise remediation plan and natural and community resource augmentation plan corresponding to ecological damage assessed and economic benefit derived due to violation. iv) The PP shall undertake Final Environment Impact Assessment and prepare Final Environment Management Plan after conducting Public Hearing. v) The PP shall be required to submit a bank guarantee equivalent to the amount of remediation plan and natural and community resource augmentation plan with the State Pollution Control Board and the PP shall deposit the bank guarantee prior to the grant of Environmental Clearance and which shall be released after successful implementation of the remediation plan and natural and community resource augmentation plan and after recommendation by Regional Office of the Ministry, State Level Expert Appraisal Committee and approval of SEIAA. vi) The PP who has committed violation of the EIA Notification dated 14.09.2006 shall be governed by the public consultation in the parent notification as per the directions dated 14.3.2018 of the Hon’ble Madras High Court in the matter of WIVIP Nos. 3361 and 3362 of 2018 and WMP No. 3721 of 2018 in WP No. 11189 of 2017 and the Office Memorandum dated 16.3.2018 of the MoEF & CC GoI. In the final EIA /EMP report , compliance of points of ToRs should be reported point wise in a statement of three columns as indicated below:-

S. No Items in the letter of the ToRs Reply / Response by the PP

Agenda no. 3 File no. F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project / Cat.6(b)(15676)/ 2019-20

Project Name:- ToR for Expansion of storage capacity of Jaipur POL Terminal of HPCL by 131 KL (from 36738 KL to 36869 KL) by increasing the height of TF-10. (Proposal No-30357) Proponent name: - HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED, Jaipur Terminal, Village- Bagru Kalan, Dist- Jaipur, (Raj). Email- Consultant Name: - Mantec Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Environment Division, D-36, Sector-6, Noida, (UP).

Observations of the committee:-

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

The consultant along with PP was present during presentation. The SEAC noted that the PP has submitted an application for obtaining ToR for proposed expansion of storage capacity of Jaipur POL Ternminal of HPCL by 131KL (from 36738KL to 36869 KL) by increasing the height of TF-10 at RIICO industrial area Bagru, Chitroli, Jaipur, Rajasthan. The PP proposes to increase the storage capacity of ethanol from 509KL to 640KL. The application for ToR is accompanied with PFR, proposed ToR and brief summary of the project. The MoEF & CC had accorded EC for laying down of multiproduct pipeline from Mundra to from Jetty (at adani port) to Mundra terminal, on 08.04.2010. This EC included Jaipur POL terminal of HPCL having capacity of 36738 KL. Resolution: Keeping in view the information contained in the documents and records, the SEAC prescribed the following ToR without public hearing as the project is located in the industrial area for carrying out One Season EIA as per the EIA notification 2006.

Standard ToR

1) Executive Summary

2) Introduction

i. Details of the EIA Consultant including NABET accreditation

ii. Information about the project proponent

iii. Importance and benefits of the project

3) Project Description

i. Cost of project and time of completion.

ii. Products with capacities for the proposed project.

iii. If expansion project, details of existing products with capacities and whether adequate land is available for expansion, reference of earlier EC if any.

iv. List of raw materials required and their source along with mode of transportation.

v. Other chemicals and materials required with quantities and storage capacities

vi. Details of Emission, effluents, hazardous waste generation and their management.

vii. Requirement of water, power, with source of supply, status of approval, water balance diagram, man-power requirement (regular and contract)

viii. Process description along with major equipments and machineries, process flow sheet

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

(quantative) from raw material to products to be provided

ix. Hazard identification and details of proposed safety systems.

x. Expansion/modernization proposals:

a. Copy of all the Environmental Clearance(s) including Amendments thereto obtained for the project from MOEF/SEIAA shall be attached as an Annexure. A certified copy of the latest Monitoring Report of the Regional Office of the Ministry of Environment and Forests as per circular dated 30th May, 2012 on the status of compliance of conditions stipulated in all the existing environmental clearances including Amendments shall be provided. In addition, status of compliance of Consent to Operate for the ongoing Iexisting operation of the project from SPCB shall be attached with the EIA-EMP report.

b. In case the existing project has not obtained environmental clearance, reasons for nottaking EC under the provisions of the EIA Notification 1994 and/or EIA Notification2006 shall be provided. Copies of Consent to Establish/No Objection Certificate andConsent to Operate (in case of units operating prior to EIA Notification 2006, CTE andCTO of FY 2005-2006) obtained from the SPCB shall be submitted. Further, compliancereport to the conditions of consents from the SPCB shall be submitted.

4) Site Details

i. Location of the project site covering village, Taluka/Tehsil, District and State, Justification for selecting the site, whether other sites were considered. ii. A toposheet of the study area of radius of 10km and site location on 1:50,000/1:25,000 scale on an A3/A2 sheet. (including all eco-sensitive areas and environmentally sensitive places) iii. Details w.r.t. option analysis for selection of site iv. Co-ordinates (lat-long) of all four corners of the site. v. Google map-Earth downloaded of the project site. vi. Layout maps indicating existing unit as well as proposed unit indicating storage area, plant area, greenbelt area, utilities etc. If located within an Industrial area/Estate/Complex, layout of Industrial Area indicating location of unit within the Industrial area/Estate. vii. Photographs of the proposed and existing (if applicable) plant site. If existing, show photographs of plantation/greenbelt, in particular. viii. Landuse break-up of total land of the project site (identified and acquired), government/ private - agricultural, forest, wasteland, water bodies, settlements, etc shall be included. (not required for industrial area) ix. A list of major industries with name and type within study area (10km radius) shall be incorporated. Land use details of the study area

x. Geological features and Geo-hydrological status of the study area shall be included.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

xi. Details of Drainage of the project upto 5km radius of study area. If the site is within 1 km radius of any major river, peak and lean season river discharge as well as flood occurrence frequency based on peak rainfall data of the past 30 years. Details of Flood Level of theproject site and maximum Flood Level of the river shall also be provided. (mega green fiel projects)

xii. Status of acquisition of land. If acquisition is not complete, stage of the acquisition processand expected time of complete possession of the land.

xiii. R&R details in respect of land in line with state Government policy

5) Forest and wildlife related issues (if applicable):

i. Permission and approval for the use of forest land (forestry clearance), if any, and recommendations of the State Forest Department. (if applicable)

ii. Landuse map based on High resolution satellite imagery (GPS) of the proposed site delineating the forestland (in case of projects involving forest land more than 40 ha)

iii. Status of Application submitted for obtaining the stage I forestry clearance along with latest status shall be submitted.

iv. The projects to be located within 10 km of the National Parks, Sanctuaries, Biosphere Reserves, Migratory Corridors of Wild Animals, the project proponent shall submit the map duly authenticated by Chief Wildlife Warden showing these features vis-à-vis the project location and the recommendations or comments of the Chief Wildlife Warden-thereon.

v. Wildlife Conservation Plan duly authenticated by the Chief Wildlife Warden of the State Government for conservation of Schedule I fauna, if any exists in the study area.

vi. Copy of application submitted for clearance under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, to the Standing Committee of the National Board for Wildlife.

6) Environmental Status

i. Determination of atmospheric inversion level at the project site and site-specific micrometeorological data using temperature, relative humidity, hourly wind speed and direction and rainfall.

ii. AAQ data (except monsoon) at 8 locations for PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOX, CO and other parameters relevant to the project shall be collected. The monitoring stations shall be based CPCB guidelines and take into account the pre-dominant wind direction, population zone and sensitive receptors including reserved forests.

iii. Raw data of all AAQ measurement for 12 weeks of all stations as per frequency given in the NAQQM Notification of Nov. 2009 along with - min., max., average and 98% values for Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

each of the AAQ parameters from data of all AAQ stations should be provided as an annexure to the EIA Report. iv. Surface water quality of nearby River (100m upstream and downstream of discharge point) and other surface drains at eight locations as per CPCB/MoEF&CC guidelines. v. Whether the site falls near to polluted stretch of river identified by the CPCB/MoEF&CC, if yes give details. vi. Ground water monitoring at minimum at 8 locations shall be included. vii. Noise levels monitoring at 8 locations within the study area. viii. Soil Characteristic as per CPCB guidelines. ix. Traffic study of the area, type of vehicles, frequency of vehicles for transportation of materials, additional traffic due to proposed project, parking arrangement etc. x. Detailed description of flora and fauna (terrestrial and aquatic) existing in the study area shall be given with special reference to rare, endemic and endangered species. If ScheduleI fauna are found within the study area, a Wildlife Conservation Plan shall be prepared and furnished. xi. Socio-economic status of the study area. 7) Impact and Environment Management Plan

i. Assessment of ground level concentration of pollutants from the stack emission based onsite- specific meteorological features. In case the project is located on a hilly terrain, theAQIP Modelling shall be done using inputs of the specific terrain characteristics fordetermining the potential impacts of the project on the AAQ. Cumulative impact of all sourcesof emissions (including transportation) on the AAQ of the area shall be assessed. Details ofthe model used and the input data used for modelling shall also be provided. The air qualitycontours shall be plotted on a location map showing the location of project site, habitationnearby, sensitive receptors, if any.

ii. Water Quality modelling - in case of discharge in water body

iii. Impact of the transport of the raw materials and end products on the surrounding environmentshall be assessed and provided. In this regard, options for transport of raw materials andfinished products and wastes (large quantities) by rail or rail-cum road transport or conveyorcum-rail transport shall be examined.

iv. A note on treatment of wastewater from different plant operations, extent recycled and reused for different purposes shall be included. Complete scheme of effluent treatment. Characteristics of untreated and treated effluent to meet the prescribed standards of discharge under E(P) Rules.

v. Details of stack emission and action plan for control of emissions to meet standards.

vi. Measures for fugitive emission control

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

vii. Details of hazardous waste generation and their storage, utilization and management. Copiesof MOU regarding utilization of solid and hazardous waste in cement plant shall also beincluded. EMP shall include the concept of waste-minimization, recycle/reuse/recover techniques, Energy conservation, and natural resource conservation.

viii. Proper utilization of fly ash shall be ensured as per Fly Ash Notification, 2009. A detailedplan of action shall be provided.

ix. Action plan for the green belt development plan in 33 % area i.e. land with not less than1,500 trees per ha. Giving details of species, width of plantation, planning schedule etc. shall be included. The green belt shall be around the project boundary and a scheme for greening of the roads used for the project shall also be incorporated.

x. Action plan for rainwater harvesting measures at plant site shall be submitted to harvestrainwater from the roof tops and storm water drains to recharge the ground water and also to use for the various activities at the project site to conserve fresh water and reduce the water requirement from other sources.

xi. Total capital cost and recurring cost/annum for environmental pollution control measures shall be included.

xii. Action plan for post-project environmental monitoring shall be submitted.

xiii. Onsite and Offsite Disaster (natural and Man-made) Preparedness and Emergency Management Plan including Risk Assessment and damage control. Disaster management plan should be linked with District Disaster Management Plan.

8) Occupational health

i. Plan and fund allocation to ensure the occupational health & safety of all contract and casual workers

ii. Details of exposure specific health status evaluation of worker. If the workers' health is being evaluated by pre designed format, chest x rays, Audiometry, Spirometry, Vision testing (Far & Near vision, colour vision and any other ocular defect) ECG, during pre placement andperiodical examinations give the details of the same. Details regarding last month analyzed data of above mentioned parameters as per age, sex, duration of exposure and department wise.

iii. Details of existing Occupational & Safety Hazards. What are the exposure levels of hazardsand whether they are within Permissible Exposure level (PEL). If these are not within PEL,what measures the company has adopted to keep them within PEL so that health of the workerscan be preserved,

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

iv. Annual report of heath status of workers with special reference to Occupational Health and Safety.

9) Corporate Environment Policy

i. Does the company have a well laid down Environment Policy approved by its Board of Directors? If so, it may be detailed in the EIA report.

ii. Does the Environment Policy prescribe for standard operating process / procedures to bring into focus any infringement / deviation / violation of the environmental or forest norms / conditions? If so, it may be detailed in the EIA.

iii. What is the hierarchical system or Administrative order of the company to deal with the environmental issues and for ensuring compliance with the environmental clearance conditions? Details of this system may be given.

iv. Does the company have system of reporting of non compliances / violations of environmental norms to the Board of Directors of the company and / or shareholders or stakeholders at large? This reporting mechanism shall be detailed in the EIA report

10) Details regarding infrastructure facilities such as sanitation, fuel, restroom etc. to be provided to the labour force during construction as well as to the casual workers including truck drivers during operation phase.

11) Enterprise Social Commitment (ESC)

i. Adequate funds (at least 2.5 % of the project cost) shall be earmarked towards the Enterprise Social Commitment based on Public Hearing issues and item-wise details along with time bound action plan shall be included. Socio-economic development activities need to be elaborated upon. 12) Any litigation pending against the project and/or any direction/order passed by any Court of Law against the project, if so, details thereof shall also be included. Has the unit received any notice under the Section 5 of Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 or relevant Sections of Air and Water Acts? If so, details thereof and compliance/ATR to the notice(s) and present status of the case. 13) A tabular chart with index for point wise compliance of above TOR.

SPECIFIC TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR EIA STUDIES FOR ISOLATED STORAGE & HANDLING OF HAZARDOUS CHEMICALS (AS PER THRESHOLD PLANNING QUANTITY INDICATED IN COLUMN 3 OF SCHEDULE 2 & 3 OF MSIHC RULES 1989 AMENDED 2000) 1. Details on list of hazardous chemicals to be stored alongwith storage quantities at the facility, their category (as per MSIHC Rules), MSDS. 2. Mode of receiving hazardous chemicals in isolated storages and mode of their dispatch.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

3. Layout plan of the storage tanks and other associated facilities.

4. Details on types and specifications of the storage facilities including tanks, pumps, piping, valves, flanges, pumps,monitoring equipments, systems for emissions control safety controls including relief systems.

5. Arrangements to control loss/leakage of chemicals and management system in case of leakage.

6. Risk Assessment & Disaster Management Plan

– Identification of hazards

– Consequence Analysis

– Details of domino effect of the storage tanks and respective preventive measures including distance between storage units in an isolated storage facility.

– Onsite and offsite emergency preparedness plan.

Agenda no. 4 File no. F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project / Cat Cat.6(b)B1 (15678)/ 2019-20

Project Name:- ToR for Expansion of storage capacity of Ajmer POL Terminal of HPCL by 240.8 kL ( from 52518 KL to 52758.8 KL) by increasing the height of TF-10.(Proposal No- 30332)

Project Proponent:- Hindustan Petroleum corporation Limited, Add-Ajmer Terminal, Village- Sardhana, NH-8, Beawar Highway, Ajmer (Raj), Email-Not given.

Consultant Name: - Mantec Consultants Pvt. Ltd, Environment Division, D-36, Sector-6, Noida, (UP).

Observations of the committee:- The consultant along with PP was present during presentation. The SEAC noted that the PP has submitted an application for obtaining ToR for proposed expansion of storage capacity of Ajmer POL Ternminal of HPCL by 240.8KL (from 52518KL to 52758.8 KL) by increasing the height of TF-10 at Village Sardhana, NH8, Bewar Highway, Ajmer, Rajasthan. The PP proposes to increase the storage capacity of ethanol from 509.2KL to 750KL. The application for ToR is accompanied with PFR, proposed ToR and brief summary of the project. The MoEF & CC had accorded EC for laying down of multiproduct pipeline from Mundra to Delhi from Jetty (at adani port) to Mundra terminal, on 08.04.2010. This EC included Ajmer POL terminal of HPCL having capacity of 52518 KL.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

Resolution: Keeping in view the information contained in the documents and records, the SEAC prescribed the following ToR with public hearing as the project is not located in the industrial area for carrying out One Season EIA as per the EIA notification 2006.

Standard ToR

1) Executive Summary

2) Introduction

i. Details of the EIA Consultant including NABET accreditation

ii. Information about the project proponent

iii. Importance and benefits of the project

3) Project Description

i. Cost of project and time of completion.

ii. Products with capacities for the proposed project.

iii. If expansion project, details of existing products with capacities and whether adequate land is available for expansion, reference of earlier EC if any.

iv. List of raw materials required and their source along with mode of transportation.

v. Other chemicals and materials required with quantities and storage capacities

vi. Details of Emission, effluents, hazardous waste generation and their management.

vii. Requirement of water, power, with source of supply, status of approval, water balance diagram, man-power requirement (regular and contract)

viii. Process description along with major equipments and machineries, process flow sheet

(quantative) from raw material to products to be provided

ix. Hazard identification and details of proposed safety systems.

x. Expansion/modernization proposals:

a. Copy of all the Environmental Clearance(s) including Amendments thereto obtained for the project from MOEF/SEIAA shall be attached as an Annexure. A certified copy of the latest Monitoring Report of the Regional Office of the Ministry of Environment and Forests as per circular dated 30th May, 2012 on the status of compliance of conditions

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

stipulated in all the existing environmental clearances including Amendments shall be provided. In addition, status of compliance of Consent to Operate for the ongoing Iexisting operation of the project from SPCB shall be attached with the EIA-EMP report.

b. In case the existing project has not obtained environmental clearance, reasons for nottaking EC under the provisions of the EIA Notification 1994 and/or EIA Notification2006 shall be provided. Copies of Consent to Establish/No Objection Certificate andConsent to Operate (in case of units operating prior to EIA Notification 2006, CTE andCTO of FY 2005-2006) obtained from the SPCB shall be submitted. Further, compliancereport to the conditions of consents from the SPCB shall be submitted.

4) Site Details

i. Location of the project site covering village, Taluka/Tehsil, District and State, Justification for selecting the site, whether other sites were considered. ii. A toposheet of the study area of radius of 10km and site location on 1:50,000/1:25,000 scale on an A3/A2 sheet. (including all eco-sensitive areas and environmentally sensitive places) iii. Details w.r.t. option analysis for selection of site iv. Co-ordinates (lat-long) of all four corners of the site. v. Google map-Earth downloaded of the project site. vi. Layout maps indicating existing unit as well as proposed unit indicating storage area, plant area, greenbelt area, utilities etc. If located within an Industrial area/Estate/Complex, layout of Industrial Area indicating location of unit within the Industrial area/Estate. vii. Photographs of the proposed and existing (if applicable) plant site. If existing, show photographs of plantation/greenbelt, in particular. viii. Landuse break-up of total land of the project site (identified and acquired), government/ private - agricultural, forest, wasteland, water bodies, settlements, etc shall be included. (not required for industrial area) ix. A list of major industries with name and type within study area (10km radius) shall be incorporated. Land use details of the study area

x. Geological features and Geo-hydrological status of the study area shall be included.

xi. Details of Drainage of the project upto 5km radius of study area. If the site is within 1 km radius of any major river, peak and lean season river discharge as well as flood occurrence frequency based on peak rainfall data of the past 30 years. Details of Flood Level of theproject site and maximum Flood Level of the river shall also be provided. (mega green fiel projects)

xii. Status of acquisition of land. If acquisition is not complete, stage of the acquisition processand expected time of complete possession of the land.

xiii. R&R details in respect of land in line with state Government policy

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

5) Forest and wildlife related issues (if applicable):

i. Permission and approval for the use of forest land (forestry clearance), if any, and recommendations of the State Forest Department. (if applicable)

ii. Landuse map based on High resolution satellite imagery (GPS) of the proposed site delineating the forestland (in case of projects involving forest land more than 40 ha)

iii. Status of Application submitted for obtaining the stage I forestry clearance along with latest status shall be submitted.

iv. The projects to be located within 10 km of the National Parks, Sanctuaries, Biosphere Reserves, Migratory Corridors of Wild Animals, the project proponent shall submit the map duly authenticated by Chief Wildlife Warden showing these features vis-à-vis the project location and the recommendations or comments of the Chief Wildlife Warden-thereon.

v. Wildlife Conservation Plan duly authenticated by the Chief Wildlife Warden of the State Government for conservation of Schedule I fauna, if any exists in the study area.

vi. Copy of application submitted for clearance under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, to the Standing Committee of the National Board for Wildlife.

6) Environmental Status

i. Determination of atmospheric inversion level at the project site and site-specific micrometeorological data using temperature, relative humidity, hourly wind speed and direction and rainfall.

ii. AAQ data (except monsoon) at 8 locations for PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOX, CO and other parameters relevant to the project shall be collected. The monitoring stations shall be based CPCB guidelines and take into account the pre-dominant wind direction, population zone and sensitive receptors including reserved forests.

iii. Raw data of all AAQ measurement for 12 weeks of all stations as per frequency given in the NAQQM Notification of Nov. 2009 along with - min., max., average and 98% values for each of the AAQ parameters from data of all AAQ stations should be provided as an annexure to the EIA Report. iv. Surface water quality of nearby River (100m upstream and downstream of discharge point) and other surface drains at eight locations as per CPCB/MoEF&CC guidelines. v. Whether the site falls near to polluted stretch of river identified by the CPCB/MoEF&CC, if yes give details. vi. Ground water monitoring at minimum at 8 locations shall be included. vii. Noise levels monitoring at 8 locations within the study area. viii. Soil Characteristic as per CPCB guidelines. Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

ix. Traffic study of the area, type of vehicles, frequency of vehicles for transportation of materials, additional traffic due to proposed project, parking arrangement etc. x. Detailed description of flora and fauna (terrestrial and aquatic) existing in the study area shall be given with special reference to rare, endemic and endangered species. If ScheduleI fauna are found within the study area, a Wildlife Conservation Plan shall be prepared and furnished. xi. Socio-economic status of the study area. 7) Impact and Environment Management Plan

i. Assessment of ground level concentration of pollutants from the stack emission based onsite- specific meteorological features. In case the project is located on a hilly terrain, theAQIP Modelling shall be done using inputs of the specific terrain characteristics fordetermining the potential impacts of the project on the AAQ. Cumulative impact of all sourcesof emissions (including transportation) on the AAQ of the area shall be assessed. Details ofthe model used and the input data used for modelling shall also be provided. The air qualitycontours shall be plotted on a location map showing the location of project site, habitationnearby, sensitive receptors, if any.

ii. Water Quality modelling - in case of discharge in water body

iii. Impact of the transport of the raw materials and end products on the surrounding environmentshall be assessed and provided. In this regard, options for transport of raw materials andfinished products and wastes (large quantities) by rail or rail-cum road transport or conveyorcum-rail transport shall be examined.

iv. A note on treatment of wastewater from different plant operations, extent recycled and reused for different purposes shall be included. Complete scheme of effluent treatment. Characteristics of untreated and treated effluent to meet the prescribed standards of discharge under E(P) Rules.

v. Details of stack emission and action plan for control of emissions to meet standards.

vi. Measures for fugitive emission control

vii. Details of hazardous waste generation and their storage, utilization and management. Copiesof MOU regarding utilization of solid and hazardous waste in cement plant shall also beincluded. EMP shall include the concept of waste-minimization, recycle/reuse/recover techniques, Energy conservation, and natural resource conservation.

viii. Proper utilization of fly ash shall be ensured as per Fly Ash Notification, 2009. A detailedplan of action shall be provided.

ix. Action plan for the green belt development plan in 33 % area i.e. land with not less than1,500 trees per ha. Giving details of species, width of plantation, planning schedule etc. shall be

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

included. The green belt shall be around the project boundary and a scheme for greening of the roads used for the project shall also be incorporated.

x. Action plan for rainwater harvesting measures at plant site shall be submitted to harvestrainwater from the roof tops and storm water drains to recharge the ground water and also to use for the various activities at the project site to conserve fresh water and reduce the water requirement from other sources.

xi. Total capital cost and recurring cost/annum for environmental pollution control measures shall be included.

xii. Action plan for post-project environmental monitoring shall be submitted.

xiii. Onsite and Offsite Disaster (natural and Man-made) Preparedness and Emergency Management Plan including Risk Assessment and damage control. Disaster management plan should be linked with District Disaster Management Plan.

8) Occupational health

i. Plan and fund allocation to ensure the occupational health & safety of all contract and casual workers

ii. Details of exposure specific health status evaluation of worker. If the workers' health is being evaluated by pre designed format, chest x rays, Audiometry, Spirometry, Vision testing (Far & Near vision, colour vision and any other ocular defect) ECG, during pre placement andperiodical examinations give the details of the same. Details regarding last month analyzed data of above mentioned parameters as per age, sex, duration of exposure and department wise.

iii. Details of existing Occupational & Safety Hazards. What are the exposure levels of hazardsand whether they are within Permissible Exposure level (PEL). If these are not within PEL,what measures the company has adopted to keep them within PEL so that health of the workerscan be preserved,

iv. Annual report of heath status of workers with special reference to Occupational Health and Safety.

9) Corporate Environment Policy

i. Does the company have a well laid down Environment Policy approved by its Board of Directors? If so, it may be detailed in the EIA report.

ii. Does the Environment Policy prescribe for standard operating process / procedures to bring into focus any infringement / deviation / violation of the environmental or forest norms / conditions? If so, it may be detailed in the EIA.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

iii. What is the hierarchical system or Administrative order of the company to deal with the environmental issues and for ensuring compliance with the environmental clearance conditions? Details of this system may be given.

iv. Does the company have system of reporting of non compliances / violations of environmental norms to the Board of Directors of the company and / or shareholders or stakeholders at large? This reporting mechanism shall be detailed in the EIA report

10) Details regarding infrastructure facilities such as sanitation, fuel, restroom etc. to be provided to the labour force during construction as well as to the casual workers including truck drivers during operation phase.

11) Enterprise Social Commitment (ESC)

i. Adequate funds (at least 2.5 % of the project cost) shall be earmarked towards the Enterprise Social Commitment based on Public Hearing issues and item-wise details along with time bound action plan shall be included. Socio-economic development activities need to be elaborated upon. 12) Any litigation pending against the project and/or any direction/order passed by any Court of Law against the project, if so, details thereof shall also be included. Has the unit received any notice under the Section 5 of Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 or relevant Sections of Air and Water Acts? If so, details thereof and compliance/ATR to the notice(s) and present status of the case. 13) A tabular chart with index for point wise compliance of above TOR.

SPECIFIC TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR EIA STUDIES FOR ISOLATED STORAGE & HANDLING OF HAZARDOUS CHEMICALS (AS PER THRESHOLD PLANNING QUANTITY INDICATED IN COLUMN 3 OF SCHEDULE 2 & 3 OF MSIHC RULES 1989 AMENDED 2000) 1. Details on list of hazardous chemicals to be stored alongwith storage quantities at the facility, their category (as per MSIHC Rules), MSDS. 2. Mode of receiving hazardous chemicals in isolated storages and mode of their dispatch.

3. Layout plan of the storage tanks and other associated facilities.

4. Details on types and specifications of the storage facilities including tanks, pumps, piping, valves, flanges, pumps,monitoring equipments, systems for emissions control safety controls including relief systems.

5. Arrangements to control loss/leakage of chemicals and management system in case of leakage.

6. Risk Assessment & Disaster Management Plan

– Identification of hazards

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

– Consequence Analysis

– Details of domino effect of the storage tanks and respective preventive measures including distance between storage units in an isolated storage facility.

– Onsite and offsite emergency preparedness plan.

Agenda no. 5 File no. F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project / Cat. 8(a)(15735)/ 2019-20

Project Name:- Affordable Housing "Neelkanth Mansarovar" (Under Chief Minister Jan Awas Yojna, 2015) coming up at Khasra no.542/175 at village- Borkahndi, Baran Road, Kota, (Rajasthan), Promoted by S.N.Associates. (Proposal No-93607).

Project Proponent:- SN Associates, Address-SN Associates, Shop No.8, VIP Complex, Dadabari Main Road, Kota, (Rajasthan), Email- [email protected], [email protected]

Consultant Name:- Gaurang Environmental Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Add-102, SNG, Shree Ratna, Apartment, Near Tambi Petrol pump, Peetal factory, Jhotwara road, Jaipur, Email- [email protected]

Information as per Form-1and other documents submitted by Project Proponent.

1. Category / Cat.8(a)B2 Item no. (in Schedule): 2. Location of Khasra no. 542/175 at village-Borkhandi, Baran Road, Kota, (Rajasthan) Project 3. Project Details Are as under: S.N. Particulars Details 1. Total plot area 8675.74 sq. m. 2. Surrendered area 433.787 sq. m 3. Net Plot area 8241.953 sq. m. 4. Gross Built up Area 43574.42 sq. m. 5. Permissible B.A.R. - 6. Utilized B.A.R. 35583.03 sq. m. 7. Permissible Ground 50 % (4337.87 sq. m.) Coverage

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

8. Utilized Ground Coverage 42.25 % (3665.50 sq. m.) 9. Permissible height - 10. Achieved height Upto Terrace level : 40.10 m Upto Mumty : 42.20 m 11. Proposed Green Area 1,238.17 sq. m. (15.02%) 12. Project Details The proposed project involves the construction of affordable housing project under Chief Minister Jan Awas Yojna, 2015 comprising of 583 number of dwelling units {1BHK (EWS):121 nos. +2BHK (LIG): 319nos. + 3BHK (LIG): 143}. Details are as Under:- S.No Blocks No of units No of Total no of /floor Floors dwelling units 1 1BHK EWS (1st - 11th) 11 11 121 2 2BHK LIG (1st - 11th) 29 11 319 3 3BHK LIG (1st - 11th) 13 11 143 Total 583

11. Other facilities Indoor Games Court (63.47sq.m), Gymnasium (100.30 sq.m.), Swimming Pool (190.74 sq. m.) & 15 Shops and community hall (846.83 sq. m.) etc. Elaborated at CP& EM 4. Details of Date of affidavit of PP : 18.05.2019 construction Date of affidavit of Consultant : 18.05.2019 taken place at site 5. Parking Required parking : 1045 two wheelers & 11 Cars Provided parking : 1067 two wheelers & 100 Cars

Details of parking are given as:

S. No. Details Total Two wheelers Four Wheelers 2. Stilt 535 100

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

3. Stilt 1 532 -- Total 1067 100

Elaborated at CP& EMP

6. Project Cost: Rs. 60.47 Crore 7. Water Total Water requirement : 282 KLD Requirement Fresh Water : 197 KLD per day Recycled Water : 85 KLD & Source Source : Municipal Water Supply Elaborated at CP& EM P 8. Fuel & As under: Energy:- Source of supply 11 kV JVVNL GSS Electrical Load Connected load : 1463.90 KW Maximum demand : 753.85 KW Transformer Number 1 Capacity 1500 kVA, 11 /0.433 kV DG Sets Number 1 Capacity 140kVA Fuel Used HSD (sulphur content: 0.05%) Fuel Consumption 23l/hr Renewable Energy Roof Top Solar PV of capacity 65 KW

Elaborated at CP& EMP 9. Application Application Submission date : 04.02.2019 No. & Date & documents submitted :-

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

10 Environment As under: Management S. Particulars Capital Cost (lacs ) Annual recurring cost Plan with No. (In lacs) budgetary 1. Stack attached to DG sets 10 0.5 provision. 2 STP 45 2.0 3 Rain water harvesting 9 0.2 4 Solid waste management 3 5 5 Pollution monitoring - 1.0 6 Fire fighting & emergency 50 0.2 handling 7 Green Belt 10 1.20 8. Solar 36 0.10 TOTAL 163 10.2

Elaborated at CP& EMP 11 CSR Activities As under : Rs. 120.94 Lacs will be provided under the CER As under:- S. No. Facilities to be Activities to be done by PP Total Expenditure Activity area provided (Rs in Lacs)

1st year 2nd year 3rdyear

60% 25% 15%

A. Education  Class Rooms . Rajkiya Madhyamik (Govt. School)  Repair work of existing building of Vidyalaya School, school village –Nohra , Dist.  Toilets – Kota , Rajasthan  School ground development  Laptop, computers, computer room 42 18 11  Photocopy machine, projector broadband  Science lab, Solar Panel system, RO water system  Sanitary Napkin Vending Machine  Sports Kit, Library with books  Furniture- Student table-chair, Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

Teachers chair  Fans , Dress for students  Rain water harvesting structure  Green belt and tree plantation

B. Swacch  Construction of 50 toilets in Repairing the nearby areas Village Borkhandi, Bharat 6 2.5 1.5  Sanitation and construction of proper Nohra etc Abhiyan drains in villages

C. Women &  Vocational education for women Farmer including providing sewing machines  Awareness camps for promoting Welfare female education in nearby village  Organizing workshops for farmers 13.0 5.50 3.50 Village Borkhandi, regarding advancements in Nohra etc agricultural techniques  Organizing medical and health check up camp in nearby villages

D. Development  Development of community park in the  Development of moksh dham community  Development of drainage system 11.0 4.5 2.5 area  Construction of roads

 Plantation in the nearby areas  Installation/Repair of Hand Pumps/Tube Wells. Total: 121.00 Lac @ 2% of Project Cost 60.47 Cr. 72.00 30.50 18.50 -

Total : Rs. 121.00 Lacs will be provided under the CER

12 STP STP capacity : 300 KLD Technology : MBBR Technology Elaborated in CP & EMP 13 Green Belt/ 1,238.17 sq. m. (15.02%) Plantation area and % of total area Elaborated in CP & EMP in sq. mts. 14 Budgetary Capital Cost : Rs.3,68,000/- Breakup for Recurring cost per Annum : Rs. 5,20,000/- Labour As under:- Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

S.No Facilities to be provided for Capital Cost Recurring cost per Annum Labourers 1. Temporary housing facilities 30 nos. of temporary houses@ - for construction workers Rs.7500/- Total- Rs. 2,25,000/- 2. Sanitation facility Rs.44,000/- - 3. Separate toilets 4 nos.@ Rs.8500/-each + other charges (Rs.10,000/-) 4. Safe Drinking water Water Tank Rs.15,000/- Rs.1,50,000/- 5. Utensils Rs.20,000/- - 6. Fuel for cooking Rs.4,000/- Rs.20,000/- 7. First Aid Facility First aid room with equipped first-aid Rs. 1,20,000/- boxes and cupboards Rs.40,000/- 8. Medical Examination - Twice in a [email protected]/- for 200 nos. of workers Total -Rs. 1,20,000/- 9. Crèche & recreation facility Rs.20,000/- Rs.60,000/- 10. Education for their children - Rs. 50,000/- Total Rs.3,68,000/- Rs. 5,20,000/-

15 Present status Proposed

Observations of the committee:- The consultant along with PP was present during presentation. The SEAC noted that the PP has submitted an application for obtaining EC for proposed affordable housing “Neelkanth Mansarova” (under Chief Minister Jan Aawas Yojna) at Khasra No. 542/175 at village Borkhndi, Baran Road, Kota, Rajasthan promoted by S.N. Associates under 8(a) category of the Schedule to the EIA notification. The total plot area of the project is 8675.74 sq. meter & total gross built up area envisaged is 43574.42 sq. meter. The project being in 8 (a) category of the Schedule to the EIA notification, public consultation is not required. The Chambal Gharial Sanctuary is located at a distance of 7 KM towards NW from the proposed project and being so the PP is required to make compliance of OM dated 02.12.2009 of the MoEF & CC. The PP has accordingly made an application on 20.05.2019 to the MoEF & CC for obtaining clearance from the standing committee of the National Board for Wild Life.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

Resolution: Keeping in view the information contained in the documents submitted by the PP and presentation made by him before the SEAC and after detailed deliberations, the members resolved to recommend to SEIAA for the grant of EC to Affordable Housing "Neelkanth Mansarovar" (Under Chief Minister Jan Awas Yojna, 2015) coming up at Khasra no.542/175 at village- Borkahndi, Baran Road, Kota, (Rajasthan), Promoted by S.N.Associates. (Proposal No- 93607). Project Proponent:- SN Associates, Address-SN Associates, Shop No.8, VIP Complex, Dadabari Main Road, Kota, (Rajasthan), Email- [email protected], [email protected] Consultant Name:- Gaurang Environmental Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Add-102, SNG, Shree Ratna, Apartment, Near Tambi Petrol pump, Peetal factory, Jhotwara road, Jaipur, [email protected] with the following conditions.

CONSTRUCTION PHASE

1. Consent to Establish” shall be obtained from RPCB before start of any construction work related to proposed project at the site. 2. The PP shall obtain a “No objection certificate” for height clearance for the envisaged level from the Airports Authority of India. 3. No Mobile tower shall be installed. 4. Solar panels for common services areas shall be provided. 5. Provision for compost pit for dry leaves shall be provided. 6. Provision for drinking water supply for the residents from a legal source shall be made. 7. As envisaged, the P.P. shall invest the an amount of Rs. 166.06 lacs as capital cost and Rs. 25.74 lacs as annual recurring cost for implementing various environmental protection measure. 8. An amount of Rs. 121.00 lacs is shall be spent over a period of 3 years on CER activities (Rs. 72 lacs in Ist Year, Rs. 30.50 lacs in IInd year & Rs. 18.50 lacs in IIIrd Year). The expenditure on these activities shall be reflected in the books of account when presented for auditing of accounts. The proposal should contain provision for toilets for girls in nearby schools. The proposal should contain provision for monthly medical camps, distribution of medicines and improvement in educational facilities in the nearby schools. The detailed action plan of CSR activities shall be submitted by the PP to RSPCB at the time of applying for Consent to Establish/Consent to Operate. During construction phase and post construction / operation phase, the project proponent shall be responsible for implementation of EIA/EMP. Commitment of proponent in this regard shall be submitted to RPCB at the time of applying for CTE/CTO. 9. Green belt/Landscaping should be developed in 1,238.17 sq. m. of total plot Area, as proposed.

10. This E.C. is issued from the environmental angle only, and does not absolve the project proponent from the other statutory obligations prescribed under any other law or any other instrument in force. The sole and complete responsibility to comply with the

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

conditions laid down in all other laws for the time-being in force, rests with the industry / unit / project proponent. Any appeal against this environmental clearance lies with the National Green Tribunal, if preferred, within a period of 30 days as prescribed under section 16 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010. 11. For conservation of electricity and to reduce energy losses the management shall ensure that the electrical voltage is stepped down from 33 KV to 11 KV and distributed at this level and finally brought to 440 volts or as per prescribed norms.

12. The PP shall obtain approval of drawings of laying electrical lines from the concerned SE of RRVPNL/ JVVNL and comply with the provisions as per Terms and Conditions for Supply of Electricity-2004 of JVVNL.

13. The PP shall fulfill the requirements of energy regulatory commission.

14. All energy saving measures proposed by the PP should be implemented before the project is put into use.

15. A preventive action plan ( as part of conceptual plan) for earthquake resistance buildings as per NBC code specifically for zone 3,4, 5 should be submitted along with the Form 1 , Form 1A and conceptual plan to RSPCB at the time of applying for CTE /CTO.

16. Road width and bend should be adequate for easy movement of fire fighting vehicles.

17. Proposals for provisions regarding accessibility to the various floors of the project and other related parts for Divyang people should be provided. 18. Details of all the points mentioned at point no. 9 under energy conservation of Form. IA would be explicitly taken care of. 19. The P.P. shall take necessary steps to improve the living conditions of the labour at site. An amount of Rs. 3,68,000/- as Capital Cost and Rs. 5,20,000/- Recurring cost per Annum shall be spent as Budgetary provision for the housing of construction labour within the site with all necessary infrastructure and facilities such as health, sanitation, fuel/LPG for cooking, safe drinking water, medical camps, toilets for women and crèche for infants etc. Such housing may be in the form of temporary structures to be removed after the completion of the project. Details of provisions should be submitted to RPCB at the time of obtaining CTE. 20. The PP will comply with the provisions as per the Building and Other Construction Workers (Regulation of Employment & Condition of Service) Act 1996. 21. The STP should be so designed so that it can cater the minimal flow due to lesser occupancy in the project so as to bring the waste water quality as per the prescribed standards. 22. The drains should be of adequate capacity and be lined till the final disposal points.

23. The entire waste water should be treated through a STP of capacity 120 KLD of MBBR technology. The construction of the STP should be carried out simultaneously with that of

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

the project and the STP should be functional before the project is put into use. The STP should have a separate hourly meter and energy meter.

24. The PP shall comply with Construction & Demolition Waste Management Rules, 2016 as applicable.

25. All required sanitary and hygienic measures shall be put in place before starting construction activities. The safe disposal of waste water and solid waste generated during the Construction phase shall be ensured.

26. All the labourers engaged for construction shall be screened for health and adequately treated before engaging them to work at the site.

27. All the topsoil excavated during the construction shall be stored for use in horticulture/landscape development within the project site.

28. Disposal of muck during construction phase should only be at approved sites with the approval of competent authority. It should not create any adverse effect on the neighbouring communities and be disposed by taking necessary precautions for general safety and health aspects of the people.

29. Soil and ground water samples will be tested to ascertain that there is no threat to the ground water quality by leaching of heavy metals and other toxic contaminants.

30. Construction spoils, including bituminous material and other hazardous materials must not be allowed to contaminate water courses and the dump sites for such material must be secured so that they do not leach into the ground water.

31. The diesel generator sets to be used during and post construction phase shall be of low- sulphur-diesel type and shall conform to Environment (Protection) Rules for air and noise emission standards.

32. Vehicles hired for bringing construction material and labourers to the site shall be in good conditions and shall conform to applicable air and noise emission standards and shall be operated during non-peak/approved hours.

33. Ambient noise levels shall conform to residential standards both during day and night. Incremental pollution loads on the ambient air and noise quality shall be closely monitored during construction phase.

34. Fly ash shall be used as building material in the construction as per the provisions of Fly Ash notification of September, 1999 and as amended till date.

35. NOC shall be obtained from National State Disaster Management Authority wherever applicable. Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

36. Provision for proposed storm water harvesting and its re-use as per CGWA and BIS standards for various applications should be implemented before the project is put into use.

37. Guidelines issued by concerned Ministry for water scarce areas be followed.

38. Water demand during construction shall be reduced by the use of pre-mixed concrete, curing agents and other best practices. Effort should be made to use treated waste water from nearby areas In place of fresh water.

39. Building Plan should be got approved from the competent Authority and the construction should be as per the approved building plan and as per applicable provisions in NBC.

40. The P.P. should ensure compliance of the order of the Hon’ble Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur in D. B. Civil writ petition no. 1536 of 2003 in the matter of Abdul Rahman vs. State of Rajasthan and others. The PP shall not allow making of any obstacle in the way of any natural water course/natural nallaha/stream carrying rain water to any water body. Adequate measures shall be taken to reduce air and noise pollution during construction as per CPCB norms.

41. Fixtures for showers, toilet flushing and drinking shall be of low flow either by use of aerators of pressure reducing devices or sensor based control.

42. Use of glass may be reduced by up to 40% to reduce the electricity consumption and load in air-conditioning. If necessary, use high quality double glass with special reflective coating windows.

43. Roofing should meet prescriptive requirement as per Energy Conservation Building Code by using appropriate thermal insulation material to fulfil requirement.

44. Opaque walls shall meet prescriptive requirement as per Energy Conservation Building Code for all air-conditioned spaces, whereas, for non- air-conditioned spaces, by use of appropriate thermal insulation material to fulfil the requirement.

45. Provision of solar water heating /chilling/street lighting etc shall be explored and implemented.

46. A first-aid room should be provided at the project site, both, during construction and operation phase of the project.

47. Any hazardous waste generated during construction phase shall be disposed of as per applicable rules and norms with necessary authorization of the RPCB.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

48. The approval of the competent authority shall be obtained for structural safety of the building due to earthquake, adequacy of fire fighting equipment, etc. as per National Building Code 2005 including protection measures from lightening etc.

49. Regular supervision of the above and other measures for monitoring shall be in place throughout the construction phase, so as to avoid nuisance to the surroundings.

50. The project proponent shall fulfil in letter and spirit, all the commitments made /submitted to the SEAC office.

51. The Company shall provide stack of adequate height at the DG sets (1X100 KVA) along with acoustic enclosures for noise control as per CPCB guidelines. The DG Sets shall comply with the norms notified under Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.

52. The PP shall obtain all requisite permissions/ approvals/clearances from concerning departments and district administration relating to project.

53. The PP shall procure required fresh water only from the authorized and legal source after approval from the competent Authority and such procurement of water shall be informed to RSPCB at time of applying for CTO/CTE.

54. The PP shall provide water flow meter at all suitable points to measure quantity of daily water consumption. Besides PP shall also provide water flow meters at waste water generation points, treated waste water, waste water recycled and utilized for plantation / gardening purposes. The daily record of this should be maintained properly in a logbook.

55. The PP shall dispose of the sludge of STP in Scientific manner.

56. The PP shall make compliance of the standards, for Noise and National Ambient Air Quality, as prescribed under the Environment (Protection) Act 1986.

57. The total waste water generation will be utilized and disposed as proposed.

58. The PP shall not discharge treated waste water in to any natural water flow or in to any water body but make efforts to utilize maximum of the treated effluent within the premises of the project.

59. The PP shall ensure that solid waste generated should be properly collected & segregated. Wet garbage should be composed and dry/inert solid waste should be disposed off at approved sites for land filling after recovering recyclable material.

60. The CFs/FLs / E-waste should be properly collected and disposed off/ sent for recycle as per the prevailing rules / guidelines issued by the regulatory authority. Use of solar panel also may be done to the possible extent.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

61. The adequate measure should be taken to prevent odour problem form STP.

62. The PP should obtain prior Consent to Operate before commissioning of the project or handed over to the occupier.

63. The PP shall provide and maintain the O&G trap in good condition so that the O&G coming with waste water from Kitchen/laundry should retain in trap.

OPERATION PHASE

1. Total domestic water requirement during operational phase shall be 282 KLD (197 KLD Fresh + 85 KLD recycled), as proposed. The necessary permission of water supply should be submitted to RSPCB at the time of applying for CTE/CTO. At the time of applying for CTE the PP should get it confirmed from RSPCB that no illegal bore well exists in the proposed site.

2. An independent expert shall certify the installation of the Sewage Treatment Plants (STP) and a report in this regard shall be submitted to the RPCB, before the project is commissioned for operation. Discharge of treated sewage shall conform to the norms & standards prescribed under the Environment (Protection) Act 1986 or the standards laid down by the Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board.

3. Adequate measures shall be taken to prevent odour from solid waste processing and STP.

4. Proper system of channelizing excess storm water shall be provided.

5. Rain Water harvesting (RWH) for roof top run-off and surface run-off, as planned shall be implemented. Before recharging the surface run off, pre-treatment must be done to remove suspended matter, oil and grease. The Rain Water Harvesting plan shall be as per GoI manual.

6. The proposals on the energy conservation measures conforming to energy conservation norms finalized by Bureau of Energy Efficiency shall be implemented.

7. The power factor shall be maintained near unity.

8. Application of solar energy shall be incorporated for illumination of common areas, lighting for gardens and street lighting in addition to provision for solar water heating. A hybrid system or fully solar system for a portion of the apartments shall be provided.

9. The parking place shall have separate entry and exit points. Traffic congestion near the entry and exit points from the roads adjoining the proposed project site must be avoided. Parking shall be fully internalized and no public space shall be utilized.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

10. Regular and periodic mock drills shall be undertaken by the fire department at least once in a year.

11. The D. G. sets to be operated with stack height as per EP Act, 1986 along with acoustic enclosure.

12. Incremental pollution loads on the ambient air quality noise and water quality shall be periodically monitored after commissioning of the project and report to be submitted to RPCB.

13. The solid waste generated shall be properly collected & segregated before disposal to the City Municipal Facility. The in-vessel bio-conversion technique may be used for composting the organic waste.

14. Any hazardous waste including biomedical waste shall be disposed of as per applicable Rules & norms with necessary approvals of the Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board.

15. The green belt design along the periphery of the plot shall achieve attenuation factor conforming to the day and night noise standards prescribed for residential land use. The proposed open space inside the plot shall be suitably landscaped and covered with vegetation of indigenous species.

16. Local species of trees and shrubs of shall be planted to allow habitat for birds with adequate distance from the boundary.

17. The SEIAA, Rajasthan reserve the right to add new conditions, modify/ annual any condition and/or to revoke the clearance if implementation of any of the aforesaid condition/other stipulations imposed by competent authorities is not satisfactory. Six monthly compliance status report of the project along with implementation of environmental measures shall be submitted to MoEF, Regional Office, Lucknow, SEIAA, Rajasthan & RPCB, Jaipur.

18. The PP shall provide adequate and proper compost pit for utilization of all the leaf litter and ensure that such waste should not be burnt.

General Conditions

1. This E.C. is issued from the environmental angle only, and does not absolve the project proponent from the other statutory obligations prescribed under any other law or any other instrument in force. The sole and complete responsibility, to comply with the conditions laid down in all other laws for the time-being in force, rests with the industry / unit / project proponent. Any appeal against this environmental clearance shall lie with the National Green Tribunal, if preferred, within a period of 30 days as prescribed under section 16 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

2. No further expansion or modifications in the project shall be carried out without prior approval of the SEIAA/Ministry of Environment and Forests as the case may be. In case of deviations or alterations in the project proposal from those submitted to this Authority for clearance, a fresh reference shall be made to the Authority to assess the adequacy of conditions imposed and to add additional environmental protection measures required, if any. 3. The implementation of the project vis-à-vis environmental action plans shall be monitored by MoEF Regional Office at Lucknow / RSPCB / CPCB / SEIAA, Department of Environment, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur and this office. A six monthly compliance status report shall be submitted to monitoring agencies. 4. The EC is liable to be rejected, in case it is found that the PP has deliberately concealed and furnished false and misleading information or data which is material to screening or scoping or appraisal or decision on the application for EC. ` 5. The project authorities shall inform the MoEF Regional Office at Lucknow / RSPCB / CPCB / SEIAA, Department of Environment, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur and the date of financial closure and final approval of the project by the concerned authorities and the date of start of the project. 6. Officials from the Department of Environment, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur/ Regional Office of MoEF, Lucknow, RSPCB who would be monitoring the implementation of Environmental safeguards should be given full cooperation, facilities and documents/data by the project proponents during their inspection. A complete set of all the documents submitted to SEIAA should be forwarded to the CCF, Regional Office of MoEF, Lucknow / SEIAA, Department of Environment, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur / RSPCB. 7. The Authority reserves the right to add additional safeguard measures subsequently, if found necessary, and to take action including revoking of the environment clearance under the provision of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, to ensure effective implementation of the suggested safeguard measures in a time bound and satisfactory manner. 8. The project proponent should advertise in at least two local Newspapers widely circulated in the region, one of which shall be in the vernacular language informing that the project has been accorded environmental Clearance and copies of clearance letters are available with the Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board and may also be seen on the website of the RSPCB. The advertisement should be made within 7 days from the day of issue of the clearance letter and a copy of the same should be forwarded to the Regional Office of MoEF at Lucknow/Department of Ecology and Environment, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 9. The conditions of EC shall be enforced among others under the provisions of water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981, the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, the Public Liability (Insurance) Act, 1991 and EIA Notification, 2006, along with their amendments and rules. 10. The PP shall obtain prior clearance form forestry and wild Life angle including clearance from standing committee of National Board of Wild Life(as applicable). It is further categorically stated that grant of EC does not necessary implies that Forestry and Wild Life clearance shall be granted to the project and that proposals for forestry and wild Life

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

clearance will be considered by the respective authorities on their merits and decision taken. The investment made in the project, if any based on EC so granted, in anticipation of clearance form Forestry and Wild Life angle shall be entirely at the cost risk of the PP and MOEF/SEIAA shall not be responsible in this regard in any manner. 11. The SEIAA, Rajasthan may revoke or suspend the clearance, if implementation of any of the above conditions is not satisfactory. 12. Main haulage road should be provided with permanent water sprinklers and other roads should be regularly wetted with water tankers fitted with sprinklers. The material transfer points should invariably be provided with Bag filters and or dry fogging system. In case of Belt- conveyors facilities the system should be fully covered to avoid air borne dust; Use of effective sprinkler system to suppress fugitive dust on haul roads and other transport roads shall be ensured. 13. Periodic monitoring of ambient air quality shall be carried out for PM10, PM2.5, SPM, SO2 and NOx monitoring. Location of the stations (minimum 6) shall be decided based on the meteorological data, topographical features and environmentally and ecologically sensitive targets and frequency of monitoring shall be decided in consultation with the Rajasthan State pollution Control Board (RPCB). Six monthly reports of the data so collected shall be regularly submitted to the RPCB/CPCB including the MoEF, Regional office, Lucknow. 14. Personnel working in dusty areas shall wear protective respiratory devices they shall also be provided with adequate training and information on safety and health aspects. 15. The ambient noise level should confirm to the standards prescribed under E (P) A Rules, 1986 viz 75 dB (A) during day time and 70 dB (A) during night time. 16. The PP shall submit an environmental statement for the financial year ending 31st March in Form-V as prescribed under the environment (Protection) Rules, 1986, as amended subsequently on or before the 30th day of September every year, to the Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board/SEIAA and shall also be put on the website of the company along with the status of compliance of environmental clearance conditions and shall also be sent to the Lucknow Regional offices of MoEF/SEIAA by e-mail as well as hard copy duly signed by competent person of company.

Agenda no. 6 File no. F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project / Cat. 3(b)B1 (15770)/ 2019-20

Project Name: - EC for proposed Cement Grinding Unit coming up at khasra No. 700/20, Vill.- Bakliawas, Merta, Distt.- Nagaur, Rajasthan promoted by M/s LC Cement Works LIP. (Praposal No-30131)

Project proponent: - “LC Cement Works LLP”, Location:at khasra no 700/20, Village- Bakliawas, Merta, Distt.- Nagaur, Rajasthan , Email.- [email protected]

Consultant Name:- Gaurang Environmental Solutions Pvt. Ltd. 102, SNG Shree Ratna, Peetal Factory, Bani Park, Jaipur Rajasthan, Email.- [email protected]

Information as per Form-1and other documents submitted by Project Proponent.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

1. Category/Item 3 (b) column 3 {Cement plants [<1.0 million tonnes/annum production capacity. All No. (in Stand alone grinding units } Schedule): 2. Location of Khasra No. 700/20, Village - Bakliawas, Tehsil - Merta, District - Nagaur in Rajasthan Project 3. Project Details S.No. Particulars Area (Sq.m.) Percentage(%) Land use Break up 1. Plant Area 1510.32 42

2. Plantation 1186.68 33

3. Open/Paved Area 899 25

Total 3596 100

(Page no. 156)

4. Details of No construction activity has been carried out by M/s LC Cement Works LLP after construction purchase of land for proposed project. taken place at site(if any) 5. Salient S. No. Particulars Details features 1. Project Name LC Cement Works LLP regarding products and 2. Location Khasra No. 700/20, Village - Bakliawas, Tehsil - Merta, District process in brief - Nagaur, Rajasthan including Plant 3. Production & Total capacity: 70,000 TPA Capacity. its Capacity  OPC: 14000 TPA  PPC: 49000 TPA  PSC: 7000 TPA 4. Land Total project area: 3596 sq. m. (0.35 Ha) requirement  Area of Industry 2829 m2 Area for housing 767 m2

5. Power 500 KW; requirement & source Source: AVVNL, Nagaur.

6. Water Total water demand: 10 KLD Requirement

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

 Fresh water demand: 7 KLD  Recycled water demand: 3 KLD 7. Source of Tanker water supply Water

8. Manpower 57 persons (direct: 17; indirect: 40)

9. Wastewater 3.4 KLD waste water will be generated from domestic generation activities. The same will be treated in STP of 4.0 KLD. 3.0 KLD treated water will be re-used for landscaping.

Industrial waste water : Nil

10. Solid waste  No solid waste will be generated from the cement generation manufacturing process, hence zero solid waste generation from the Cement Plant.  The Spent oil will be generated from the machineries; the same will be sent to authorized recycler.  Dust collected from air pollution control equipment will be totally recycled back in the process.  Sludge from Sewage Treatment Plant (STP) will be used as manure for green belt development. 11. Project Cost 161.08 Lac

12. EMP costs EMP Capital Cost - Rs. 42.0 Lac

EMP Recurring Cost -Rs. 2.3 Lac

13. Cost towards Rs. 3.30 Lac @ 2% of Project cost CSR activities

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

Process Flow chart

(Page no. 280 & 160)

6. Raw Materials requirement ( S. Raw Quantity Sourced from Mode of In case of more No. material transport then one TPA TPD product Raw 1. Clinker 48300 138 Shree Cement Ltd. (Beawar/ Road material for Ras) each product should be 2. Gypsum 3500 10 M/s Anjana Choudhary Mines, Road specified ) Nagaur. 3. Fly Ash 14700 42 NLC India, Bikaner Road

4. Slag 3500 10 Jodhpur Road

Total 70,000 200 - -

(Page no. 163) 7. Solid waste . No solid waste will be generated from the clinker grinding process, hence zero solid /haz.waste waste generation from the proposed plant is envisaged. quantities and . The Spent oil generated from the machineries will be sent to authorized recycler. management . Dust collected from air pollution control equipment will be totally recycled back in

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

the process. . Sludge from Sewage Treatment Plant (STP) will be used as manure for green belt development. (Page no. 213) 8. Use of Clinker Grinding process does not require any solid / substances or liquid or Hazardous wastes. materials (Page no. 149) which are hazardous 9. Project Cost Total Cost of Proposed Project: Rs. 161.08 Lac/- (Page no. 129) 10. Water The daily water requirement for the project will be 10.0 KLD (7.0 KLD Fresh + 3.0 Requirement & KLD recycled) Source S.No Particulars Demand Quantity

Industrial Daily water demand 6.0

1 Fresh water demand 3.0

Recycled water 3.0

2 Domestic Daily water demand 4.0 Source of water:-. Tanker water supply (Page no. 164) Total waste water generation Area Waste water Disposal generated Industrial 0 There will be no waste water generation from manufacturing process.

Domestic 3.0 KLD of treated 3.4 0 KLD water will be re-used for landscaping, after treatment in STP of 4.0 KLD capacity.

(Page no. 141) 11. Fuel & Energy The power demand for the project will be 500 KW. The same will be supplied by AVVNL. DG set of 650 kVA will be used for emergency power back-up only. HSD will be used for DG set. (Page no. 200) 12. Application No. Application no.: SIA/RJ/IND/30313/2018 Dated 13.02.2019 Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

& Date & (Page no. 74) documents submitted 13. Environment Management S. No. Particulars Capital cost Recurring cost Plan along with Budgetary 1. Air pollution control equipment 3000000 30000 breakup 2. Water Pollution Control 150000 15000

3. Noise Pollution Control 200000 20000

4. Rainwater harvesting pits 200000 20000

5. Greenbelt development 450000 25000

6. Occupational health 200000 20000

7. Environmental Monitoring - 100000

Total 42,00,000 230000

(Page no. 288 ) 14. CSR Activates CER Plan with Budgetary Allocation along with S. Facilities to be Activities to be done Total Activity area budgetary No. provided by PP Expenditure

breakup (Rs in lac)

1st 2nd 3rd year year 60% 25% year 15%

Education (Rajkiye  Repair work for the 1.50 0.70 0.40 Rajkiye Uchh Uchh Prathmik school building and Prathamik A. Vidhyalay, construction of room Vidhyalaye Bakliyawas,  Furniture (Table& inVillage Merta) chair) Bakliyawas,  Plantation of trees Merta

Development in  Repair work for roads 0.40 0.20 0.10 the community in nearby village of B. area Bakhliyawas and Bakliyawas proper maintenance of drainage along with plantation of trees Rs. 3.22 Lac @ 2% of Project Cost 1.61 Cr. 1.90 0.90 0.50

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

Total : Rs. 3.30 Lac will be provided under the “CER”

15. ETP There will be no waste water generation from manufacturing process. 3.4 KLD waste water will be generated from the domestic sources which will be treated in the STP of 4.0 KLD capacity. After treatment, 3.0 KLD water will be available which will be used for landscaping. Hence, there will be no excessive treated water. No waste water will be discharged outside the plant premises. (page no.210) 16. Green Budget Allocation for Greenbelt Development Belt/Plantation Particulars 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th Grand Year Year Year year Year Total

1. Core Zone: following plantation will be developed in the existing 33 % greenbelt area of the project site.

Saplings required for project 50 50 50 50 50 250 site greenbelt

Amount (@ INR. 100 per 5000 5000 5000 5000 5000 25000 sapling)

2. Buffer Zone: Every year 100 sapling will be planted upto 5 years with in LIZ area like, agriculture hedges, various places of urban area (public places) and along road.

Saplings required for project 100 100 100 100 100 500 site greenbelt sapling

Amount (@ INR. 100 per 10000 10000 10000 10000 10000 INR sapling) 50000/-

All other costs like labor costs for plantation, soil filling dressing, irrigation etc. will also borne by proponent.

(page no. 223) 17. Budgetary Breakup for S.No Facilities to be provided for Labour Capital Cost Labour 1. Temporary housing facilities for construction workers Rs.60,000/- 2. Sanitation facility Rs.10,000/- Separate toilets Rs. 20,000/- 3. Safe Drinking water Rs.10,000/- 4. Utensils 5. Fuel for cooking Rs. 10,000/- 6. First Aid Facility Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

7. Medical Examination 8. Education for their children Rs.40,000/-

Total Rs. 1,50,000/- During construction and installation of proposed clinker grinding unit, an amount of Rs. 1.50, 000/- will be spent as capital cost. The contractual labour will be hired from nearby areas after commissioning of plant. (page no. 435)

Observations of the committee:- The consultant along with PP was present during presentation. The SEAC noted that the PP has submitted an application for obtaining EC for new proposed stand alone clinker grinding unit at Khasra no. 700/20, Village- Bakliawas, Merta, Distt.- Nagaur, Rajasthan having production capacity of 200 tones per day (or 70000 MTPA). The project involves manufacture of ordinary Portland cement, Portland pozzolana cement and Portland slag cement. The project falls under category 3(b) of the Schedule of the EIA notification and come under the perview of SEIAA. However, the MoEF & CC vide letter dated 26.10.2018 had issued ToR. The PP had submitted application for obtainin EC to the MoEF&CC as the SEIAA/SEAC was not in existence at that time. The base line studies for the project were carried out during March-May, 2018 (pre mansoon season) and public hearing was held at Atal Seva Kendra, Village Panchayat, Riya Shyamdas, Tehsil Merta, District Nagaur, Rajasthan on 16.11.2018. The project does not have any areas protected under international convention, area which are important or sensitive for ecological reasons, areas used by protected, important or sensitive species of flora/ fauna and there is also no state/ national boundary, within 15 Km of the project site. The project does not involve approval/ clearance under the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and Wild Life Protection Act, 1972 as no forest land is involved and neither there is any Wild Life Sancturay/ National Park within 10 Km from the project site.

Resolution: Keeping in view the information contained in the documents submitted by the PP and presentation made by him before the SEAC and after detailed deliberations, the members resolved to recommend to SEIAA for the grant of EC to the proposed Stand Alone Clinker Grinding Unit at khasra No. 700/20, Village - Bakliawas, Tehsil- Merta, Distt.- Nagaur, Rajasthan promoted by M/s LC Cement Works LLP. Project proponent: - LC Cement Works LLP, Village- Bakliawas, Merta, Distt.- Nagaur, Rajasthan , Email.- [email protected] Consultant Name:- Gaurang Environmental Solutions Pvt. Ltd. 102, SNG Shree Ratna, Peetal Factory, Bani Park, Jaipur Rajasthan, Email.- [email protected] with the following conditions.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

Specific Condition:

1. The EC is granted for clinker grinding unit for manufacturing of 200TPD(70000TPA) Cement. 2. The PP shall obtain Consent to Establish and Consent to Operate under the provisions of Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act’ 74 and Air (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act’ 81 from the RPCB. 3. The Water Requirement for the project shall not exceed 10 KLD(7KLD fresh water & 3 KLD recycled water). The water requirement shall be met from outside tanker supply. No ground water shall be extraction without prior permission of the CGWA. 4. No industrial waste water shall be generated and for treatment of domestic waste water(3.4 KLD) a STP of 4 KLD capacity shall be provided. The treated domestic waste water (3KLD) shall be used for plantation within the premises. 5. The PP shall achieve the stack emission standards and ambient air standards as notified under E.P. Rules, 1986 6. The height of the stack for disbursement of the process emissions shall not be less than 30 mtrs from ground level. 7. The particulate matter and gaseous emissions (SOx, NOx, CO, CO2, etc) from various processes/ units/storages/sources shall conform to the standards prescribed by the RPCB/CPCB or under the Environment (Protection) Rules' 1986 from time to time. 8. At no time, the emissions shall go beyond the prescribed standards. In the event of failure of any pollution control system adopted by the unit, the unit shall immediately put off operation and shall not restart until the control measures are rectified to achieve the desired efficiency. 9. An amount of Rs 1,50,000 as capital cost shall be used for labor welfare within the site and all necessary infrastructure and facilities such as housing facility, health facility, sanitation facility, and fuel for cooking, along with safe drinking water, medical camps, and toilets for women, crèche for infants shall be provided. 10. The PP shall install adequate dust collection and extraction system to control fugitive dust emissions at loading/unloading points and at all the transfer points. For source emission control, bag filters shall be provided on clinker hopper, cement silo, fly ash silo, elevator; packer; cement transport equipment etc which will also contribute to reduce fugitive emissions. The fugitive emissions during loading and unloading shall be suitably controlled. Fugitive dust emissions from ball mill and storage areas shall be collected in bag filters and recycled back to the process. Storage of raw material shall be in closed roof sheds. Water sprinkling arrangement shall be made in the raw material stock yard and cement bag loading areas. 11. Ambient air quality monitoring shall be conducted in the down wind direction as well as where maximum ground level concentration of PM10 & PM2.5., SOx, NOx, CO, CO2, are anticipated. 12. Stack air emission sampling facilities shall be provided for the emissions monitoring as per the Central Pollution Control Board guidelines, in consultation with RPCB. 13. Online continuous monitoring system shall be provided at the stack of ball mill/grinding mill for monitoring of PM level in accordance with the CPCB and RPCB guidelines. 14. Data on ambient air quality and emissions shall be submitted to RPCB once in six months carried out by MOEF/NABL/CPCB/Government approved lab. 15. The Company shall provide stacks of adequate height with the of D.G. Set of 650 kVA along with acoustic enclosures for noise control as per CPCB guidelines. The DG Sets shall comply with the norms notified under Environment (Protection) Act, 1986. Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

16. Fugitive dust emissions shall be controlled as per relevant guidelines issued by CPCB. 17. The PP shall provide separate drainage and outlets for the management of storm water. 18. Handling, manufacture, storage and transportation of hazardous chemicals shall be in accordance with the Manufacture, Storage and Import of Hazardous Chemicals Rules, 1989 (amended till date). 19. The PP shall take adequate measures for the control of noise so as to keep the noise levels below 85 Db in the work environment. Persons working near the machines should be provided with well-designed ear muffs/plugs and other personnel protective equipments. 20. A green belt development plan be prepared and implemented so as to cover at least 33% area of the plot size. 21. A qualified person in the field of environment or separate Environmental Management Cell shall be established to implement and carry out various functions is set up under the control of a Senior Executive who will report directly to the head of the project. 22. As envisaged under the Environmental Management Plan, the PP shall earmark an amount of Rs. 42 Lacs towards initial capital cost and Rs. 2.30 Lacs towards annual recurring cost for implementing the Environmental Protection Measures. The funds earmarked for the environmental protection measures shall be kept in separate account and shall not be diverted for other purposes and year wise expenditure shall be reported to RPCB under the rules prescribed for environmental audit. 23. Implementation of the environmental safeguards like fire fighting, water harvesting etc. along with socio economic measures like group insurance, free medical facilities, ESI/EPF facilities to the employees as envisaged under the Environmental Management Plan; details are to be submitted to the Rajasthan Pollution Control Board, at the time of applying for consent to establish/operate. 24. An amount of Rs. 3.30 lacs is shall be spent over a period of 3 years on CER activities (Rs. 1.90 lacs in Ist Year, Rs. 0.90 lacs in IInd year & Rs. 00.50 lacs in IIIrd Year). The expenditure on these activities shall be reflected in the books of account when presented for auditing of accounts. The proposal should contain provision as stated in above mentioned table. 25. The PP shall ensure that, the EC letter as well as the status of compliance of EC conditions and the monitoring data are placed on company’s website and displayed at the project site. 26. All the other statutory clearances such as the approvals for storage of diesel from the Chief Controller of Explosives, Fire department, Civil Aviation Department, Forest Conservation Act, 1980 and Wildlife (protection) Act, 1972 etc. shall be obtained, as may be applicable, by PP from the competent authority. 27. These stipulations would also be enforced amongst the others under the provisions of Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981, the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, the Public Liability (Insurance) Act, 1991 and EIA Notification’ 06. 28. The SEIAA, Rajasthan reserves the right to add new conditions, modify/annual any of the stipulated conditions and/or to revoke the clearance if implementation of any of the condition stipulated by SEIAA, Rajasthan or any other competent authorities is not satisfactory.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

General Conditions

1. This E.C. is issued from the environmental angle only, and does not absolve the project proponent from the other statutory obligations prescribed under any other law or any other instrument in force. The sole and complete responsibility, to comply with the conditions laid down in all other laws for the time-being in force, rests with the industry / unit / project proponent. Any appeal against this environmental clearance shall lie with the National Green Tribunal, if preferred, within a period of 30 days as prescribed under section 16 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010. 2. No further expansion or modifications in the project shall be carried out without prior approval of the SEIAA/Ministry of Environment and Forests as the case may be. In case of deviations or alterations in the project proposal from those submitted to this Authority for clearance, a fresh reference shall be made to the Authority to assess the adequacy of conditions imposed and to add additional environmental protection measures required, if any. 3. The implementation of the project vis-à-vis environmental action plans shall be monitored by MoEF Regional Office at Lucknow / RSPCB / CPCB / SEIAA, Department of Environment, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur and this office. A six monthly compliance status report shall be submitted to monitoring agencies. 4. The EC is liable to be rejected, in case it is found that the PP has deliberately concealed and furnished false and misleading information or data which is material to screening or scoping or appraisal or decision on the application for EC. ` 5. The project authorities shall inform the MoEF Regional Office at Lucknow / RSPCB / CPCB / SEIAA, Department of Environment, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur and the date of financial closure and final approval of the project by the concerned authorities and the date of start of the project. 6. Officials from the Department of Environment, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur/ Regional Office of MoEF, Lucknow, RSPCB who would be monitoring the implementation of Environmental safeguards should be given full cooperation, facilities and documents/data by the project proponents during their inspection. A complete set of all the documents submitted to SEIAA should be forwarded to the CCF, Regional Office of MoEF, Lucknow / SEIAA, Department of Environment, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur / RSPCB. 7. The Authority reserves the right to add additional safeguard measures subsequently, if found necessary, and to take action including revoking of the environment clearance under the provision of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, to ensure effective implementation of the suggested safeguard measures in a time bound and satisfactory manner. 8. The project proponent should advertise in at least two local Newspapers widely circulated in the region, one of which shall be in the vernacular language informing that the project has been accorded environmental Clearance and copies of clearance letters are available with the Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board and may also be seen on the website of the RSPCB. The advertisement should be made within 7 days from the day of issue of the clearance letter and a copy of the same should be forwarded to the Regional Office of MoEF at Lucknow/Department of Ecology and Environment, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 9. The conditions of EC shall be enforced among others under the provisions of water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981, the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, the Public Liability (Insurance) Act, 1991 and EIA Notification, 2006, along with their amendments and rules.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

10. The PP shall obtain prior clearance form forestry and wild Life angle including clearance from standing committee of National Board of Wild Life(as applicable). It is further categorically stated that grant of EC does not necessary implies that Forestry and Wild Life clearance shall be granted to the project and that proposals for forestry and wild Life clearance will be considered by the respective authorities on their merits and decision taken. The investment made in the project, if any based on EC so granted, in anticipation of clearance form Forestry and Wild Life angle shall be entirely at the cost risk of the PP and MOEF/SEIAA shall not be responsible in this regard in any manner. 11. The SEIAA, Rajasthan may revoke or suspend the clearance, if implementation of any of the above conditions is not satisfactory. 12. Main haulage road should be provided with permanent water sprinklers and other roads should be regularly wetted with water tankers fitted with sprinklers. The material transfer points should invariably be provided with Bag filters and or dry fogging system. In case of Belt- conveyors facilities the system should be fully covered to avoid air borne dust; Use of effective sprinkler system to suppress fugitive dust on haul roads and other transport roads shall be ensured. 13. Periodic monitoring of ambient air quality shall be carried out for PM10, PM2.5, SPM, SO2 and NOx monitoring. Location of the stations (minimum 6) shall be decided based on the meteorological data, topographical features and environmentally and ecologically sensitive targets and frequency of monitoring shall be decided in consultation with the Rajasthan State pollution Control Board (RPCB). Six monthly reports of the data so collected shall be regularly submitted to the RPCB/CPCB including the MoEF, Regional office, Lucknow. 14. Personnel working in dusty areas shall wear protective respiratory devices they shall also be provided with adequate training and information on safety and health aspects. 15. The ambient noise level should confirm to the standards prescribed under E (P) A Rules, 1986 viz 75 dB (A) during day time and 70 dB (A) during night time. 16. The PP shall submit an environmental statement for the financial year ending 31st March in Form-V as prescribed under the environment (Protection) Rules, 1986, as amended subsequently on or before the 30th day of September every year, to the Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board/SEIAA and shall also be put on the website of the company along with the status of compliance of environmental clearance conditions and shall also be sent to the Lucknow Regional offices of MoEF/SEIAA by e-mail as well as hard copy duly signed by competent person of company.

Agenda no. 7 File no. F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project / Cat. 5(a)B1 (15771)/ 2019-20

Project Name:- Amendment in Environment Clearance of Rama Phosphate Ltd. An existing Phosphate fertilizer manufacturing nuite, situated at # 4807/11, Jhamarkota Road, Village- Umra, Tehsil- Girwa, Distt.- Udaipur (Raj)(Praposal No-30679)

Project Proponent:- RAMA PHOSPHATES LIMITED. Plot No. 4807/11, Jhamarkotra Road, Village – Umar, Tehsil- Girwa, State- Udaipur, Rajasthan, Email.- [email protected]

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

Consultant Name:- Gaurang Environmental Solutions Pvt. Ltd. 102, SNG Shree Ratna Apartments, Near Tambi Petrol Pump, Jothwara Road, Jaipur Rajasthan, Email- [email protected]

Observations and Resolution of the committee:- The project is covered by the activity mentioned at S.No. 5(a), of the Scheduled to the EIA. It provides that all chemical fertilizer projects including all SSP with H2SO4 production except gramulation of chemical fertilizer are category A Projects. Category ‘A’ project are appraised by MoEF & CC. The present project is SSP project where H2SO4 is produced during manufacturing process. In view of this the project is apprisable by the MoEF & CC. The PP, however, denied during presentation that it is ‘A’category project and requested SEAC to defer the mater as he will seek clarification from the MoEF & CC in this regard or produce document showing that the project is a ‘B’ category project . The SEAC accepted the request of the PP and asked him to submit the same within 45 days.

Agenda no. 8 File no. F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project / Cat. 8(a)B2 (15691)/ 2019-20

Project Name:- EC of proposed Affordable Housing Project "Ekta Residency" at khasra no. 274/144,275/144,279/145 (part), 145(part) village Manpura, Tehsil-Ladpura, Kota, Promoted by Fazal Associates. (Proposal No-91601).

Proponent Name:- Fazal Associates, Add-24, Ground Floor, Aakash Mall, Aerodrome circle, Dist-Kota,(Raj.),Email-ektaresidency20182gmail.com, [email protected]

Consultant Name:- Gaurang Environmental Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Add-501,Soni's Paris Point, Collectorate Circle, Bani Park , Jaipur,Rajasthan, [email protected]

Information as per Form-1and other documents submitted by Project Proponent.

1. Category / Cat.8(a)B2 Item no. (in Schedule): 2. Location of Khasra no. 274/144, 275/144, 279/145 (part), 145(part) village Manpura, Tehsil Ladpura, Kota. Project 3. Project Details Are as under: S.N. Particulars Details 1. Total plot area 6740 sq. m. 2. Surrendered area 1379 sq. m. 3. Net Plot area 5361 sq.m. 4. Gross Built up Area 22,281.84 sq. m. Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

5. Permissible B.A.R. 2.00+ (extra as per byelaws 6. Utilized B.A.R. 3.68 (20192.59 sq.m.) 7. Permissible Ground Coverage 50% (2680.5 sq. m.) 8. Utilized Ground Coverage 37.97% (2035.59 sq. m.) 9. Permissible height -- 10. Achieved height Upto Terrace level : 32.70 m Upto Mumty : 35.55m 11. Proposed Green Area 12.34 % (661.71 sq. m.) 12. Project Details The Proposed Project will involve the construction of Affordable housing project under Chief Minister Jan Awas Yojna, 2015 comprising of 400 number of dwelling units (EWS 130 nos. + LIG 270 nos., 11 Shops & community hall 218.6 sq. m. etc).Details are as under:- Details are as Under:- S.No Particulars Others facilities EWS LIG Total units 1. Ground/Stilt Floor Parking Shops : 11 Nos. - - - Community Hall : 218.6 sq. m. 2. 1st Floor-10th floor - 13 x10 27 x10 400 Total 130 270 400

11. Other facilities Shops : 11 Nos. Community Hall : 218.6 sq. m. Elaborated at CP& EMP 4. Details of Date of affidavit of PP : 18.05.2019 construction Date of affidavit of Consultant : 18.05.2019 taken place at site

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

5. Parking Required parking : 670 two wheelers Provided parking : 700 two wheelers Required ECU : 4 Cars Provided ECU : 11 Cars

Details are as under:-

S. No. Details Two wheelers Cars 1. Stilt 452 - 2. Open 248 11 Total 700 11

Elaborated at CP& EMP 6. Project Cost: Rs.44.16 Crores. 7. Water Total Water requirement : 186 KLD Requirement Fresh Water : 131 KLD per day Recycled Water : 55 KLD & Source Source : Municipal water Supply Elaborated at CP& EMP 8. Fuel & As under: Energy:- Source of supply 11 kV JVVNL(KEDL) GSS

Electrical Load Connected load : 915 KW Maximum demand : 514 KW Transformer Number 1

Capacity 750 kVA, 11 /0.433 kV

DG Sets Number 1

Capacity 320 kVA

Fuel Used HSD (sulphur content: 0.05%)

Fuel Consumption 64 l/hr

Renewable Energy Roof Top Solar PV of capacity 35 KW

Elaborated at CP& EMP

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

9. Application Application Submission date : 29.01.2019 No. & Date & documents submitted :- 10 Environment As under: Management S. No. Particulars Capital Cost Annual recurring cost Plan with 1. Stack attached to D.G set 10 lacs 1 lac budgetary 2 STP 36 lacs 4 lacs provision. 3 Rain water harvesting 6 lacs 1 lacs 4 Solid waste management 2.21 lacs 10 lacs 5 Pollution monitoring -- 1.5 lacs 6 Fire fighting & emergency handling 50 lacs 1 lacs 7 Green Belt 10 lacs 2 lacs 8 Solar Roof top Grid PV 19.25 lacs 1 lacs TOTAL 133.46 Lacs 21.5 Lacs

Elaborated at CP& EMP 11 CSR Activities As under : Rs. 88.50 Lac will be provided under the CER As under:- S. No. Facilities to be Activities to be done by PP Total Expenditure Activity area provided (Rs in lac)

1st year 2nd year 3rdyear 60% 25% 15%

A. Education  Construction / Repairing :- Rajkiya Uchh Prathmik (Government  Class rooms Vidhyalya Village- School)  Big Hall Manpura , District –  Boundary wall of the school Kota, Rajasthan compound 32 13 9.5  Pavement in and around school Computer room with 10 computers and networking  Photocopy machine with Printer, scanner  Library room with books

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

 Science Lab  Solar panel system  R. O. Water System Water Cooler Refrigerator and 10 year AMC  Furniture - Students 120  Tree Plantation B. Swacch Bharat  Construction of 20 toilets Village Manpura and 3.5 1.5 1.0 Abhiyan  Repair of drains nearby areas

C. Women &  Vocational education for women Farmer Welfare including providing sewing machines  Awareness camps for promoting female education in nearby village 6 2.5 1.5 Village Manpura and  Organizing workshops for farmers nearby areas regarding advancements in agricultural techniques  Organizing medical and health check up camp in nearby villages D. Development in  Development of community park the community  Development of moksh dham area  Development of drainage system 11.0 4.5 2.50  Construction of roads

 Plantation in the nearby areas  Installation/Repair of Hand Pumps/Tube Wells. Rs. 88.50 Lac @ 2% of Project Cost 44.16 Cr. 52.5 21.50 14.5

Total : Rs. 88.50 Lac will be provided under the CER

12 STP STP capacity : 180 KLD Technology : MBBR Technology Elaborated in CP & EMP 13 Green Belt/ 12.34 % (661.71 sq. m.) Plantation area and % of total area in sq. mts. Elaborated in CP & EMP 14 Budgetary Capital Cost : Rs.4,32,000/- Breakup for Recurring cost per Annum : Rs.5,25,000/- Labour

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

As under:- S.No Facilities to be provided for Labourers Capital Cost Recurring cost per Annum

1. Temporary housing facilities for 30 nos. of temporary houses@ - construction workers Rs.7500/- Total- Rs. 2,25,000/- 2. Sanitation facility Rs.95,000/- -  Separate toilets 10nos.@ Rs.8500/-each  Other charges other charges (Rs.10,000/-) 3. Safe Drinking water Water Tank Rs.12,000/- Rs.1,20,000/- 4. Utensils Rs.20,000/- - 5. Fuel for cooking Rs.10,000/- Rs.20,000/- 6. First Aid Facility First aid room with equipped first-aid Rs. 1,50,000/- boxes and cupboards Rs.45,000/- 7. Medical Examination - Twice in a [email protected]/- for 200 nos. of workers Total -Rs. 1,20,000/- 8. Crèche & recreation facility Rs.25,000/- Rs.65,000/- 9. Education for their children - Rs. 50,000/- Total Rs.4,32,000/- Rs.5,25,000

15 Present status Proposed

Observations of the committee:- The consultant along with PP was present during presentation. The SEAC noted that the PP has submitted an application for obtaining EC for proposed affordable housing project “Ekta Residency coming up at Khasra No. 274/144, 275/144, 279/145 (part), 145 (part) at village Manpura, Tehsil Ladpura, Kota, Rajasthan promoted by Fazal Associates. The project is categorized as B2 under 8(a) category of the Schedule to the EIA notification. The net plot area of the project is 5361sq. meter & total gross built up area envisaged is 22281.84 sq. meter. The project being in 8 (a) category of the Schedule to the EIA notification and thus public consultation is not required. The Chambal Gharial Sanctuary is located at a distance of 4.7 KM towards WNW from the proposed project and being so the PP is required to make compliance of OM dated 02.12.2009 of the MoEF & CC. The PP has accordingly made an application on 28.05.2019 to the MoEF & CC for obtaining clearance from the standing committee of the National Board for Wild Life.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

Resolution: Keeping in view the information contained in the documents submitted by the PP and presentation made by him before the SEAC and after detailed deliberations, the members resolved to recommend to SEIAA for the grant of EC to proposed Affordable Housing Project "Ekta Residency" at khasra no. 274/144,275/144,279/145 (part), 145(part) village Manpura, Tehsil-Ladpura, Kota, Promoted by Fazal Associates. Proponent Name:- Fazal Associates, Add- 24, Ground Floor, Aakash Mall, Aerodrome circle, Dist- Kota (Raj.), Email- ektaresidency20182gmail.com, [email protected] Consultant Name:- Gaurang Environmental Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Add-501,Soni's Paris Point, Collectorate Circle, Bani Park , Jaipur,Rajasthan, [email protected] with the following conditions.

CONSTRUCTION PHASE

1. Consent to Establish” shall be obtained from RPCB before start of any construction work related to proposed project at the site. 2. The PP shall obtain a “No objection certificate” for height clearance for the envisaged level from the Airports Authority of India. 3. No Mobile tower shall be installed. 4. Solar panels for common services areas shall be provided. 5. Provision for compost pit for dry leaves shall be provided. 6. Provision for drinking water supply for the residents from a legal source shall be made. 7. As envisaged, the P.P. shall invest the an amount of Rs. 131.25 lacs as capital cost and Rs. 11.50 lacs as annual recurring cost for implementing various environmental protection measure. 8. An amount of Rs. 80.50 lacs shall be spent over a period of 3 years on CER activities (Rs. 52.5 lacs in Ist Year, Rs. 21.50 lacs in IInd year & Rs. 14.50 lacs in IIIrd Year). The expenditure on these activities shall be reflected in the books of account when presented for auditing of accounts. The proposal should contain provision for toilets for girls in nearby schools. The proposal should contain provision for monthly medical camps, distribution of medicines and improvement in educational facilities in the nearby schools. The detailed action plan of CSR activities shall be submitted by the PP to RSPCB at the time of applying for Consent to Establish/Consent to Operate. During construction phase and post construction / operation phase, the project proponent shall be responsible for implementation of EIA/EMP. Commitment of proponent in this regard shall be submitted to RPCB at the time of applying for CTE/CTO.

9. Green belt/Landscaping should be developed in 661.71 m2. of total plot Area, as proposed.

10. This E.C. is issued from the environmental angle only, and does not absolve the project proponent from the other statutory obligations prescribed under any other law or any other instrument in force. The sole and complete responsibility to comply with the

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

conditions laid down in all other laws for the time-being in force, rests with the industry / unit / project proponent. Any appeal against this environmental clearance lies with the National Green Tribunal, if preferred, within a period of 30 days as prescribed under section 16 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010. 11. For conservation of electricity and to reduce energy losses the management shall ensure that the electrical voltage is stepped down from 33 KV to 11 KV and distributed at this level and finally brought to 440 volts or as per prescribed norms.

12. The PP shall obtain approval of drawings of laying electrical lines from the concerned SE of RRVPNL/ JVVNL and comply with the provisions as per Terms and Conditions for Supply of Electricity-2004 of JVVNL.

13. The PP shall fulfill the requirements of energy regulatory commission.

14. All energy saving measures proposed by the PP should be implemented before the project is put into use.

15. A preventive action plan ( as part of conceptual plan) for earthquake resistance buildings as per NBC code specifically for zone 3,4, 5 should be submitted along with the Form 1 , Form 1A and conceptual plan to RSPCB at the time of applying for CTE /CTO.

16. Road width and bend should be adequate for easy movement of fire fighting vehicles.

17. Proposals for provisions regarding accessibility to the various floors of the project and other related parts for Divyang people should be provided. 18. Details of all the points mentioned at point no. 9 under energy conservation of Form. IA would be explicitly taken care of.

19. The P.P. shall take necessary steps to improve the living conditions of the labour at site. An amount of Rs.4.32 Lacs as Capital cost and Rs. 5.25 Lacs per year as Recurring Cost shall be spent as Budgetary provision for the housing of construction labour within the site with all necessary infrastructure and facilities such as health, sanitation, fuel/LPG for cooking, safe drinking water, medical camps, toilets for women and crèche for infants etc. Such housing may be in the form of temporary structures to be removed after the completion of the project. Details of provisions should be submitted to RPCB at the time of obtaining CTE.

20. The PP will comply with the provisions as per the Building and Other Construction Workers (Regulation of Employment & Condition of Service) Act 1996. 21. The STP should be so designed so that it can cater the minimal flow due to lesser occupancy in the project so as to bring the waste water quality as per the prescribed standards. 22. The drains should be of adequate capacity and be lined till the final disposal points.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

23. The entire waste water should be treated through a STP of capacity 180 KLD of MBBR technology. The construction of the STP should be carried out simultaneously with that of the project and the STP should be functional before the project is put into use. The STP should have a separate hourly meter and energy meter.

24. The PP shall comply with Construction & Demolition Waste Management Rules, 2016 as applicable.

25. All required sanitary and hygienic measures shall be put in place before starting construction activities. The safe disposal of waste water and solid waste generated during the Construction phase shall be ensured.

26. All the labourers engaged for construction shall be screened for health and adequately treated before engaging them to work at the site.

27. All the topsoil excavated during the construction shall be stored for use in horticulture/landscape development within the project site.

28. Disposal of muck during construction phase should only be at approved sites with the approval of competent authority. It should not create any adverse effect on the neighbouring communities and be disposed by taking necessary precautions for general safety and health aspects of the people.

29. Soil and ground water samples will be tested to ascertain that there is no threat to the ground water quality by leaching of heavy metals and other toxic contaminants.

30. Construction spoils, including bituminous material and other hazardous materials must not be allowed to contaminate water courses and the dump sites for such material must be secured so that they do not leach into the ground water.

31. The diesel generator sets to be used during and post construction phase shall be of low- sulphur-diesel type and shall conform to Environment (Protection) Rules for air and noise emission standards.

32. Vehicles hired for bringing construction material and labourers to the site shall be in good conditions and shall conform to applicable air and noise emission standards and shall be operated during non-peak/approved hours.

33. Ambient noise levels shall conform to residential standards both during day and night. Incremental pollution loads on the ambient air and noise quality shall be closely monitored during construction phase.

34. Fly ash shall be used as building material in the construction as per the provisions of Fly Ash notification of September, 1999 and as amended till date.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

35. NOC shall be obtained from National State Disaster Management Authority wherever applicable. 36. Provision for proposed storm water harvesting and its re-use as per CGWA and BIS standards for various applications should be implemented before the project is put into use.

37. Guidelines issued by concerned Ministry for water scarce areas be followed.

38. Water demand during construction shall be reduced by the use of pre-mixed concrete, curing agents and other best practices. Effort should be made to use treated waste water from nearby areas In place of fresh water.

39. Building Plan should be got approved from the competent Authority and the construction should be as per the approved building plan and as per applicable provisions in NBC.

40. The P.P. should ensure compliance of the order of the Hon’ble Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur in D. B. Civil writ petition no. 1536 of 2003 in the matter of Abdul Rahman vs. State of Rajasthan and others. The PP shall not allow making of any obstacle in the way of any natural water course/natural nallaha/stream carrying rain water to any water body. Adequate measures shall be taken to reduce air and noise pollution during construction as per CPCB norms.

41. Fixtures for showers, toilet flushing and drinking shall be of low flow either by use of aerators of pressure reducing devices or sensor based control.

42. Use of glass may be reduced by up to 40% to reduce the electricity consumption and load in air-conditioning. If necessary, use high quality double glass with special reflective coating windows.

43. Roofing should meet prescriptive requirement as per Energy Conservation Building Code by using appropriate thermal insulation material to fulfil requirement.

44. Opaque walls shall meet prescriptive requirement as per Energy Conservation Building Code for all air-conditioned spaces, whereas, for non- air-conditioned spaces, by use of appropriate thermal insulation material to fulfil the requirement.

45. Provision of solar water heating /chilling/street lighting etc shall be explored and implemented.

46. A first-aid room should be provided at the project site, both, during construction and operation phase of the project.

47. Any hazardous waste generated during construction phase shall be disposed of as per applicable rules and norms with necessary authorization of the RPCB.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

48. The approval of the competent authority shall be obtained for structural safety of the building due to earthquake, adequacy of fire fighting equipment, etc. as per National Building Code 2005 including protection measures from lightening etc.

49. Regular supervision of the above and other measures for monitoring shall be in place throughout the construction phase, so as to avoid nuisance to the surroundings.

50. The project proponent shall fulfil in letter and spirit, all the commitments made /submitted to the SEAC office.

51. The Company shall provide stacks of adequate height at the DG set (1X320 KVA) along with acoustic enclosures for noise control as per CPCB guidelines. The DG Sets shall comply with the norms notified under Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.

52. The PP shall obtain all requisite permissions/ approvals/clearances from concerning departments and district administration relating to project.

53. The PP shall procure required fresh water only from the authorized and legal source after approval from the competent Authority and such procurement of water shall be informed to RSPCB at time of applying for CTO/CTE.

54. The PP shall provide water flow meter at all suitable points to measure quantity of daily water consumption. Besides PP shall also provide water flow meters at waste water generation points, treated waste water, waste water recycled and utilized for plantation / gardening purposes. The daily record of this should be maintained properly in a logbook.

55. The PP shall dispose of the sludge of STP in Scientific manner.

56. The PP shall make compliance of the standards, for Noise and National Ambient Air Quality, as prescribed under the Environment (Protection) Act 1986.

57. The total waste water generation will be utilized and disposed as proposed.

58. The PP shall not discharge treated waste water in to any natural water flow or in to any water body but make efforts to utilize maximum of the treated effluent within the premises of the project.

59. The PP shall ensure that solid waste generated should be properly collected & segregated. Wet garbage should be composed and dry/inert solid waste should be disposed off at approved sites for land filling after recovering recyclable material.

60. The CFs/FLs / E-waste should be properly collected and disposed off/ sent for recycle as per the prevailing rules / guidelines issued by the regulatory authority. Use of solar panel also may be done to the possible extent.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

61. The adequate measure should be taken to prevent odour problem form STP.

62. The PP should obtain prior Consent to Operate before commissioning of the project or handed over to the occupier.

63. The PP shall provide and maintain the O&G trap in good condition so that the O&G coming with waste water from Kitchen/laundry should retain in trap.

OPERATION PHASE

1. Total domestic water requirement during operational phase shall be 186 KLD (131 KLD Fresh + 55 KLD recycled), as proposed. The necessary permission of water supply should be submitted to RSPCB at the time of applying for CTE/CTO. At the time of applying for CTE the PP should get it confirmed from RSPCB that no illegal bore well exists in the proposed site.

2. An independent expert shall certify the installation of the Sewage Treatment Plants (STP) and a report in this regard shall be submitted to the RPCB, before the project is commissioned for operation. Discharge of treated sewage shall conform to the norms & standards prescribed under the Environment (Protection) Act 1986 or the standards laid down by the Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board.

3. Adequate measures shall be taken to prevent odour from solid waste processing and STP.

4. Proper system of channelizing excess storm water shall be provided.

5. Rain Water harvesting (RWH) for roof top run-off and surface run-off, as planned shall be implemented. Before recharging the surface run off, pre-treatment must be done to remove suspended matter, oil and grease. The Rain Water Harvesting plan shall be as per GoI manual.

6. The proposals on the energy conservation measures conforming to energy conservation norms finalized by Bureau of Energy Efficiency shall be implemented.

7. The power factor shall be maintained near unity.

8. Application of solar energy shall be incorporated for illumination of common areas, lighting for gardens and street lighting in addition to provision for solar water heating. A hybrid system or fully solar system for a portion of the apartments shall be provided.

9. The parking place shall have separate entry and exit points. Traffic congestion near the entry and exit points from the roads adjoining the proposed project site must be avoided. Parking shall be fully internalized and no public space shall be utilized.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

10. Regular and periodic mock drills shall be undertaken by the fire department at least once in a year.

11. The D. G. sets to be operated with stack height as per EP Act, 1986 along with acoustic enclosure.

12. Incremental pollution loads on the ambient air quality noise and water quality shall be periodically monitored after commissioning of the project and report to be submitted to RPCB.

13. The solid waste generated shall be properly collected & segregated before disposal to the City Municipal Facility. The in-vessel bio-conversion technique may be used for composting the organic waste.

14. Any hazardous waste including biomedical waste shall be disposed of as per applicable Rules & norms with necessary approvals of the Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board.

15. The green belt design along the periphery of the plot shall achieve attenuation factor conforming to the day and night noise standards prescribed for residential land use. The proposed open space inside the plot shall be suitably landscaped and covered with vegetation of indigenous species.

16. Local species of trees and shrubs of shall be planted to allow habitat for birds with adequate distance from the boundary.

17. The SEIAA, Rajasthan reserve the right to add new conditions, modify/ annual any condition and/or to revoke the clearance if implementation of any of the aforesaid condition/other stipulations imposed by competent authorities is not satisfactory. Six monthly compliance status report of the project along with implementation of environmental measures shall be submitted to MoEF, Regional Office, Lucknow, SEIAA, Rajasthan & RPCB, Jaipur.

18. The PP shall provide adequate and proper compost pit for utilization of all the leaf litter and ensure that such waste should not be burnt.

General Conditions

1. This E.C. is issued from the environmental angle only, and does not absolve the project proponent from the other statutory obligations prescribed under any other law or any other instrument in force. The sole and complete responsibility, to comply with the conditions laid down in all other laws for the time-being in force, rests with the industry / unit / project proponent. Any appeal against this environmental clearance shall lie with the National Green Tribunal, if preferred, within a period of 30 days as prescribed under section 16 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

2. No further expansion or modifications in the project shall be carried out without prior approval of the SEIAA/Ministry of Environment and Forests as the case may be. In case of deviations or alterations in the project proposal from those submitted to this Authority for clearance, a fresh reference shall be made to the Authority to assess the adequacy of conditions imposed and to add additional environmental protection measures required, if any. 3. The implementation of the project vis-à-vis environmental action plans shall be monitored by MoEF Regional Office at Lucknow / RSPCB / CPCB / SEIAA, Department of Environment, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur and this office. A six monthly compliance status report shall be submitted to monitoring agencies. 4. The EC is liable to be rejected, in case it is found that the PP has deliberately concealed and furnished false and misleading information or data which is material to screening or scoping or appraisal or decision on the application for EC. ` 5. The project authorities shall inform the MoEF Regional Office at Lucknow / RSPCB / CPCB / SEIAA, Department of Environment, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur and the date of financial closure and final approval of the project by the concerned authorities and the date of start of the project. 6. Officials from the Department of Environment, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur/ Regional Office of MoEF, Lucknow, RSPCB who would be monitoring the implementation of Environmental safeguards should be given full cooperation, facilities and documents/data by the project proponents during their inspection. A complete set of all the documents submitted to SEIAA should be forwarded to the CCF, Regional Office of MoEF, Lucknow / SEIAA, Department of Environment, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur / RSPCB. 7. The Authority reserves the right to add additional safeguard measures subsequently, if found necessary, and to take action including revoking of the environment clearance under the provision of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, to ensure effective implementation of the suggested safeguard measures in a time bound and satisfactory manner. 8. The project proponent should advertise in at least two local Newspapers widely circulated in the region, one of which shall be in the vernacular language informing that the project has been accorded environmental Clearance and copies of clearance letters are available with the Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board and may also be seen on the website of the RSPCB. The advertisement should be made within 7 days from the day of issue of the clearance letter and a copy of the same should be forwarded to the Regional Office of MoEF at Lucknow/Department of Ecology and Environment, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 9. The conditions of EC shall be enforced among others under the provisions of water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981, the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, the Public Liability (Insurance) Act, 1991 and EIA Notification, 2006, along with their amendments and rules. 10. The PP shall obtain prior clearance form forestry and wild Life angle including clearance from standing committee of National Board of Wild Life(as applicable). It is further categorically stated that grant of EC does not necessary implies that Forestry and Wild Life clearance shall be granted to the project and that proposals for forestry and wild Life clearance will be considered by the respective authorities on their merits and decision taken. The investment made in the project, if any based on EC so granted, in anticipation of clearance form Forestry and Wild Life angle shall be entirely at the cost risk of the PP and MOEF/SEIAA shall not be responsible in this regard in any manner.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

11. The SEIAA, Rajasthan may revoke or suspend the clearance, if implementation of any of the above conditions is not satisfactory. 12. Main haulage road should be provided with permanent water sprinklers and other roads should be regularly wetted with water tankers fitted with sprinklers. The material transfer points should invariably be provided with Bag filters and or dry fogging system. In case of Belt- conveyors facilities the system should be fully covered to avoid air borne dust; Use of effective sprinkler system to suppress fugitive dust on haul roads and other transport roads shall be ensured. 13. Periodic monitoring of ambient air quality shall be carried out for PM10, PM2.5, SPM, SO2 and NOx monitoring. Location of the stations (minimum 6) shall be decided based on the meteorological data, topographical features and environmentally and ecologically sensitive targets and frequency of monitoring shall be decided in consultation with the Rajasthan State pollution Control Board (RPCB). Six monthly reports of the data so collected shall be regularly submitted to the RPCB/CPCB including the MoEF, Regional office, Lucknow. 14. Personnel working in dusty areas shall wear protective respiratory devices they shall also be provided with adequate training and information on safety and health aspects. 15. The ambient noise level should confirm to the standards prescribed under E (P) A Rules, 1986 viz 75 dB (A) during day time and 70 dB (A) during night time. 16. The PP shall submit an environmental statement for the financial year ending 31st March in Form-V as prescribed under the environment (Protection) Rules, 1986, as amended subsequently on or before the 30th day of September every year, to the Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board/SEIAA and shall also be put on the website of the company along with the status of compliance of environmental clearance conditions and shall also be sent to the Lucknow Regional offices of MoEF/SEIAA by e-mail as well as hard copy duly signed by competent person of company. Agenda no. 9 File no. F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project / Cat. 1(a)B1 (15592)/ 2019-20

Project Name:- Panchpura Soapstone & Dolomite mine over an area of 31.39 hect (M.L.No- 5/2001) Village Panchpura,Tehsil-Sabla, District-Dungarpur,Rajasthan in favor of M/S Nalwaya Industries Pvt.Ltd. (Praposal No-29383)

Proponent Name:- M/S- Nalwaya Mineral Industries Pvt. Ltd. Add- R/O- 7-A, Bapu Bazar, Udaipur, [email protected]

Consultant Name:- Udaipur Min-Tech PVT. LTD., Add-206, Apeksha Complex.Sec-11.Hiran Magri, Udaipur (Raj) [email protected]

Observations and Resolution of the committee:- The PP and consultant were present during presentation today on 28.05.19. The PP during presentation, vide letter dated 28.05.19, has requested to defer the case as he wants to include some mineral in the lease area and the proposal be considered after submition of modified application. The SEAC agreed to the request and resolved that the PP shall submit application in this regard within 45 days from the receipt of communication in this regard.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

Agenda no. 10. File no. F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project / Cat. 1(a)B1 (15593)/ 2019-20

Project Name:- Submission of Application for Prior Environmental Clearance –Form I along with Pre-Feasibility Report of Deopur-1 Soapstone & Dolomite mine over an area of 31.91hect. (M.L.No-4/65 & 07/98) near Village –Deopur, Tehsil- Sabla & District- Dungarpur (Raj) in favour of M/S Nalwaya Mineral Industries PVT.LTD. (Praposal No-28605)

Proponent Name:- M/S-Nalwaya Mineral Industries Pvt. Ltd. Add- R/O- 7-A,Bapu Bazar, Udaipur, [email protected]

Consultant Name:- Udaipur Min-Tech PVT. LTD., Add-206, Apeksha Complex.Sec-11.Hiran Magri, Udaipur (Raj) [email protected]

Observations and Resolution of the committee:-

The PP and consultant were present during presentation today on 28.05.19. The PP during presentation, vide letter dated 28.05.19, has requested to defer the case as he wants to include some mineral in the lease area and the proposal be considered after submition of modified application. The SEAC agreed to the request and resolved that the PP shall submit application in this regard within 45 days from the receipt of communication in this regard.

Agenda no. 11. File no. F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project / Cat. 1(a)B1 (15594)/ 2019-20

Project Name: - Application for ToR (Prior Environmental Clearance) - Form I along with Pre- Feasibility Report for Sarah Kishnayat Ball Clay, Fire Clay, Red & Yellow Ochre Mine Lease, Area -69.59hect. M.L.No.21/04 Near village –Sarah Kishnayat, Tehsil-Kolayat, District-Bikaner, Rajasthan of M/S Deepak Mineral Industriesin Compliance of MoEF’s Notification dt.14/08/2018 (Praposal No-29973)

Proponent Name: - M/S Deepak Mineral Industries, ADD-Bagri Mohalla, Bikaner -334001, MoB- 9414139607.

Consultant Name: - Udaipur Min-Tech PVT. LTD, Add-206, Apeksha Complex, Sec-11 Hiran Magri, Udaipur (Raj), Email- [email protected].

Observations and Resolution of the committee:-

The PP and consultant were present during presentation today on 28.05.19. It is a case of revalidation of EC and enhancement of production capacity. Earlier EC was granted by MoEF & CC on 26.07.2006. The record pertaining to this case has not been received from the MoEF & CC. The PP has sought deferment of the case for pursuing transfer of record from MoEF & CC to SEIAA, Rajasthan. The SEAC agreed to the request of PP and decided to defer the matter till record is received from MoEF & CC.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

Agenda no. 12. File no. F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project / Cat. 1(a)B1 (15604)/ 2019-20

Project Name: - EC for Nathara ki Pal -IA Soapstone Mine Lease Area -97.13 hect. M.L. No- 6/98 at near Village- Nathara Ki Pal ,Tehsil-Sarada, District- Udaipur, State-Rajasthan, Lessee- M/S Nalwaya Mineral Industries Pvt. Ltd. in compliance of MoEF's Notification dt.14.08.2018.

Proponent Name:- M/S Nalwaya Mineral Industries Pvt. Ltd. Add-7-A Bapu Bazar, Udaipur- 313001, [email protected].

Consultant Name:- M/S Udaipur Min-Tech Pvt. Ltd. Add.-206,Apeksha Complex, Sec-11, Hiran Magri, Udaipur (Raj), Email- [email protected].

Observations and Resolution of the committee:- The PP and consultant were present during presentation today on 28.05.19. In the present matter the PP had applied to the MoEF & CC for ToR for mining of Soap stone on 13.10.2015. Technical presentation was also made before the MoEF & CC on 21.12.2015 and accordingly ToR were also issued on 08.01.2016 by the MoEF & CC. Now the PP has submitted application for EC before SEIAA in pursuance to MoEF & CC notification dated 14.08.2018. The record pertaining to this case has not been received from the MoEF & CC. The PP has sought deferment of the case for pursuing transfer of record from MoEF & CC to SEIAA, Rajasthan. The SEAC agreed to the request of PP and decided to defer the matter till record is received from MoEF & CC.

Agenda no. 13. File no. F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project /Cat. 1(a)B1 (15532)/ 2019-20

Project Name: - Terms of Reference of Sapstone Mine (ML.NO. 05/1999), Area:-24.92 Ha. Production Capacity: - 84000 TPA, Khasra No. - Not given, Village - Mandwa, Tehsil & Distt. - Udaipur (Raj.)

Proponent Name: - M/S Tarun Minerals, Add- Near Jain Temple, Tehsil Kherwara, Distt. - Udaipur, (Raj.), [email protected].

Consultant Name: - Apex Mintech Consultant, Add- 3, Dhebar Colony, Near I.T.I Pratapnagar Udaipur, (Raj.) Email: - [email protected], [email protected] [email protected].

Observations of the committee:- The PP had obtained EC from the MoEF & CC vide letter dated 09.11.2006 for mining of 12000 TPA of Soap stone at mining lease No. 5/99 comprising 24.92 hectare located at village Mandwa, Tehsil Dungarpur, District Dungarpur under the EIA notification dated 27.01.1994. The certified production figures reveal that the production of Soap stone in the base year i.e. 1993-94 was 4250 MTA. The PP, however, increased production of Soap stone to 4330 in the year 2001-02 without obtaining prior EC from the regulatory authority in accordance with the

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

EIA notification dated 27.01.1994. It is thus a case of violation of the EIA notification, 1994. The PP in his affidavit dated 28.05.2019 has also admitted that he has increased production without obtaining prior EC under the said notification. The project, therefore, requires to be dealt with as a case of violation in accordance with the provision of the notification dated 14.03.2017 and 08.03.2018 of the MoEF & CC and also in accordance with the directions dated 02.08.2017 of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of Common Cause Vs Union of India & oth.

Resolution:

The SEAC after considering the presentation made by the PP and consultant, perusal of record and the affidavit submitted by the PP regarding admission of violation of the EIA notification by increasing production of the mineral beyond the level of production made in the base year 1993- 94 and view of the aforesaid observations resolved to issue violation ToR with public hearing as per Annexure’B’.

Agenda no. 14. File no. F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project / Cat. 1(a)B1 (15533)/ 2019-20

Project Name:- Terms of Reference of Quartz, Feldspar & Mica Ghoras, Bhagatpura, Bhunas Mine (ML.NO.18/91), Rev. M.L. No. 991/2011, Area:-38.77 Ha. (Ghors- 18.52 ha. Bhunas- 9.00., Ha., Bhagatpura- 11.25 ha.) Production Capacity: - 30,000 TPA, Khasra No. - 45G/15, Add: - Village - Mandal, Sahada, Deogarh & Distt. - Bhilwara (Raj.)

Proponent Name: - M/S Seth Pusa Lal Mansinghka Pvt. Ltd., Add- Pusa Niwas, Near Under Bridge, Pos & Distt. -Bhilwara, (Raj.), Email: - [email protected]

Consultant Name: - Apex Mintech Consultant, Add- 3, Dhebar Colony, Near I.T.I Pratapnagar Udaipur, (Raj.) Email: - [email protected], [email protected] [email protected]

Observations of the committee:- The PP and consultant were present during presentation. The SEAC observed that the PP has not submitted valid approved mining plan, certified production figures of the mineral since 1993-94/ inception of the mine and other documents. The PP vide letter dated 28.05.19 has requested for deferment of the case as the mining plan is under process for approval of the competent authority.

Resolution:

The SEAC considered the request of the PP and resolved to defer the case for presentation and ask the PP to submit the requsite documents / information within 45 days from receipt of communication in this regard.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

Agenda no. 15. File no. F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project / Cat. 1(a)B1(15737)/ 2019-20

Project Name:- ToR in respect of Rajol (kalyanpur) soapstone Mine (M.L. No.02/87, Area of 19.1881 ha.) of Shri Ashok Kumar karwa, situated near village Rajol (kalyanpur) Tehsil- Klyanpur & Disltrict-Udaipur Rajasthan.Khasra no-46E/13. (Praposal No-31034)

Proponent Name:- Shri Ashok Kumar karwa,Add-Industrial Area, Pratapnagar, Udaipur,Email- [email protected], [email protected]

Consultant Name:- Apex Mintech Consultant, Add- 3, Dhebar Colony, Near I.T.I Pratapnagar Udaipur, (Raj.) Email:- [email protected], [email protected] [email protected]

Observations of the committee:- The PP had obtained EC from the MoEF & CC vide letter dated 09.11.2006 for mining of 12000 TPA of Soap stone at mining lease No. 5/99 comprising 24.92 hectare located at village Mandwa, Tehsil Dungarpur, District Dungarpur under the EIA notification dated 27.01.1994. The certified production figures reveal that the production of Soap stone in the base year i.e. 1993-94 was 4250 MTA. The PP, however, increased production of Soap stone to 4330 in the year 2001-02 without obtaining prior EC from the regulatory authority in accordance with the EIA notification dated 27.01.1994. It is thus a case of violation of the EIA notification, 1994. The PP in his affidavit dated 28.05.2019 has also admitted that he has increased production without obtaining prior EC under the said notification. The project, therefore, requires to be dealt with as a case of violation in accordance with the provision of the notification dated 14.03.2017 and 08.03.2018 of the MoEF & CC and also in accordance with the directions dated 02.08.2017 of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of Common Cause Vs Union of India & oth.

Resolution:

The SEAC after considering the presentation made by the PP and consultant, perusal of record and the affidavit submitted by the PP regarding admission of violation of the EIA notification by increasing production of the mineral beyond the level of production made in the base year 1993- 94 and view of the aforesaid observations resolved to issue violation ToR with public hearing as per Annexure’B’.

Agenda no. 16. File no. F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project / Cat. 1(a)B1 (15602)/ 2019-20

Project Name:- ToR for proposed expansion mining project of "Quartz Feldspar,Calcity and Masonry Stone mine (M.L.-34/04)", Area- 20.0 hect., khasra no. 1,3,47,49,56,34 to 39,50 to 52 of Village Atbhigha; khasra no. 96,97,93,94 of village Chak basdi; khasra no. 60, 69,71, 70, 70/471, 67, 68, 66 and 70 of village Chak Khandela; khasra no. 65/1, 65/2, 66, 66/170 of village Khandela basdi and khasra no. 2, 11/305 of village Charanwas near Village -Atbhigha, Tehsil-

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

Khandela, District-Sikar, State-Rajasthan, Promoted By M/S Reverence Mines & Minerals Pvt. Ltd. Plot/ Survey/ Khasra no- Toposheet No -45M/10.Area no-20.00 hect. (Praposal no-75949)

Proponent Name:- M/s Reverence Mines & minerals Pvt.Ltd., Director & Authorized -Mr.Inder Kumar, Add-A-28, Anita Colony, Bajaj Nagar, Jaipur. [email protected]

Consultant Name:- TEAM Institute of Science & Technology Pvt. Ltd., E-65, Chitranjan marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur.

Observations of the committee:- The PP had obtained EC from the MoEF & CC vide letter dated 15.05.2006 for mining of 5000 TPA of Quartz Feldspar,Calcity and Masonry Stone at mining lease No. 34/04 comprising 20.0 hectare located at Village -Atbhigha, Tehsil-Khandela, District-Sikar, State-Rajasthan under the EIA notification dated 27.01.1994. As per approved mining plan the lease area comprises khasra no. 1, 3, 47, 49, 56, 34 to 39, 50 to 52 of Village Atbhigha; khasra no. 96,97,93,94 of village Chak basdi; khasra no. 60, 69, 71, 70, 70/471, 67, 68, 66 and 70 of village Chak Khandela; khasra no. 65/1, 65/2, 66, 66/170 of village Khandela basdi and khasra no. 2, 11/305 of village Charanwas. The PP has sought ToR for incresing production of the afforesaid minerals from 5,000 TPA to 12,61,730 TPA. The modified mining plan has been approved by SME, Jaipur on 19.04.2018. The project cost is 2.00 Crore. The mining lease is a part of cluster as per cluster map prepared by the Mining Engineer and being so the project requires preparation of cluster EIA and EMP and holding of common public hearing. The application for revalidation of EC as per notification dated 06.4.2018 of the MoEF & CC has been made on 20.07.2018 i.e. within the prescribed period. The project does not have any areas protected under international convention, area which are important or sensitive for ecological reasons, areas used by protected, important or sensitive species of flora/ fauna and there is also no state/ national boundary, within 10 Km of the project site. The project does not involve approval/ clearance under the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and Wild Life Protection Act, 1972 as no forest land is involved and neither there is any Wild Life Sancturay/ National Park within 10 Km from the project site.

Resolution:

The SEAC after considering the presentation made by the PP and consultant, perusal of record and the affidavit submitted by the PP regarding non violation of the EIA notification and view of the aforesaid observations resolved to issue the following ToR with public consultation.

General ToR:

1. The validity period of this ToRs letter would be for a period of three years from the date of dispatch of the ToRs letter.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

2. The study area will comprise 10 km zone around the mine lease from lease periphery and the data contained in the EIA with respect to mining operations such as conceptual pit limits, waste generation etc. should be for the life of the mine/lease period.

3. Location of other industries & mines within the study area along with their production and pollutants generated by them, estimated pollution load and cumulative impact on environment including the proposed project should be submitted. The same shall be accounted for while generating mathematical models of pollution dispersion for preparation of the EMP.

4. In the case of existing mine, year-wise production (since inception of the mines) details clearly indicating the proposed highest production for the life of the mine/lease period should be submitted.

5. Details of land to be used as the designated dumping site for OB dump should be selected and proposed within the lease area as per the approved mining plan. In no case the overburden should be dumped outside the lease area, however proposal for utilization of OB for construction or other meaningful use to the extent possible may be submitted and should try to work on zero waste patterns. Details regarding quantity of solid waste generation to be estimated and details for its disposal and dump management are to be provided.

6. Land use plan of the mine lease area should be prepared to encompass pre-operational, operational and post operational phases.

7. The P.P. should provide a mining plan along-with progressive mine closer plan and implementation plan at the time of submission of application for the EC.

8. Based on the study and the points raised by the people during public hearing, the P.P. shall work out an effective plan to address the environmental, socio-economic and other issues identified during the process, with suitable funds allocation for the purpose. Further PP shall implement all commitments made during public hearing, while implementing the project.

9. Certificate regarding mine lease area not falling in the Aravalli Hills issued by the Mining Engineer/ Assistant Mining Engineer in the prescribed format, as per the instructions contained in the letter no. DMG/ADM/Env/EC/F11/06/17-76 dt. 17.01.2011 issued by the Director, Department of Mines and Geology, GoR, Udaipur, should be submitted.

10. List/details within 10 km radius of the mine lease area, the location of human settlement, water bodies, Reserve Forest, National Parks, Sanctuaries, Biosphere Reserves, Wildlife Corridors, Tiger/Elephant reserves (existing / proposed), shall be clearly indicated giving the land use. Necessary clearance, if any, as may be applicable to such projects due to proximity of the ecologically sensitive areas as mentioned above shall be obtained from the Chief Wildlife Warden under the Wildlife (Protection) Act’ 1972 and submitted. This location map

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

should also indicate the list and location of other mine leases existing, if any, within 10 km radius.

11. The ToR is subject to the specific condition that the PP shall obtain prior clearance from forestry and wild life angle including clearance from Standing Committee of the National Board Wild Life if applicable. It is further categorically stated that grant of EC does not necessary implies that forestry and wild life clearance shall be granted to the project and that their proposals for forestry and wild life clearance will be considered by the respective authorities on their merits and decision taken. The investment made in the project, if any, based on environment clearance so granted, in anticipation of the clearance from forestry and wildlife angle shall be entirely at the cost and risk of the project proponent and Ministry of Environment & Forests shall not be responsible in this regard in any manner.

12. A detailed biological study for the study area [core zone and buffer zone (10 km radius of the periphery of the mine lease)] shall be carried out. Details of flora and fauna, duly authenticated, separately for core and buffer zone should be furnished based on field survey. The details regarding flora to include information regarding (a) trees, shrubs, grasses, (b) frequency, density, I V I, abundance % of species occurring on proposed site, (c) dominant species of trees, shrubs , grasses (d) endemic species, (e) threatened species, (f) rare species, (g) endangered species and (h) vulnerable species. The details of fauna to include information regarding list and distribution clearly indicating the Schedule of the fauna present. In case of any scheduled-I fauna found in the study area, the necessary plan for their conservation should be prepared in consultation with State Forest and Wildlife Department and details furnished. Necessary allocation of funds for implementing the same should be made as part of the project cost.

13. Collection of one season (non-monsoon) primary baseline data on ambient air quality, water quality, noise level, soil and flora and fauna, ambient air quality should be determined by

measuring the concentration of parameters like P.M.2.5, P.M.10, SO2, NOx according to the latest standards prescribed by CPCB. Site-specific meteorological data should also be collected. The location of the monitoring stations (minimum 6) should be justified. Date wise collected baseline AAQ data should form part of EIA and EMP report. The monitoring shall be carried out by CPCB/NABL/ MOEF&CC/GoR approved laboratory and copy of the report to be submitted.

14. Air quality modelling should be carried out for prediction of impact of the project on the air quality of the area. It should also take into account the impact of movement of vehicles for transportation of mineral. The details of the model used and input parameters used for modelling should be provided. The air quality contours may be shown on a location map clearly indicating the location of the site, location of sensitive receptors, if any and the habitation. The wind roses showing pre-dominant wind direction should be indicated on map.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

Wind Rose Diagram should be representative and include stability class and inversion phenomenon of that area along with the lapse rate.

15. Surface and ground water study should be carried out, both pre-monsoon and post monsoon monitoring. Information about proposed working depth of mining area, groundwater table both in above MSL and Below Ground Level (BGL) should be provided. Based on actual monitored data, it may clearly be shown whether mine working will intersect groundwater table or not. In case the mining activity intersects the ground water table then necessary permission from CGWA should be obtained. Impact of the project on the water quality both surface and groundwater should also be assessed and necessary safeguard measures, if any required should be provided. Further, submit water drainage plan of the 10 km study area.

16. The P.P. should ensure compliance of the order of the Hon’ble Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur, in D. B. Civil writ petition no. 1536 of 2003 in the matter of Abdul Rahman vs State of Rajasthan and others and submit a brief note regarding compliance of the court order.

17. The water requirement for the project, its availability and source to be furnished. A detailed water balance should also be provided. Fresh water requirement (if any) for the project should also be indicated. Necessary clearance from the Competent Authority for drawl of requisite quantity of water for the project should be provided. Details of water conservation measures including rainwater harvesting should be provided and to be adopted in the project.

18. Consumption of diesel and its storage should be provided along with an action plan for its efficient consumption.

19. The Conceptual post mine land use plan and Reclamation & Rehabilitation (R&R) plan of mined out area (with plans and sections at appropriate scale as per MCDR 1988) should be submitted.

20. Impact on local transport and infrastructure due to the project: Projected increase in hauling vehicles as a result of the project in the present road network (including those outside the project area) and whether it is capable of handling the increased load. Arrangement for improving the infrastructure to avoid any congestion especially at junctions and mishaps throughout the route of transportation of mineral should be ensured and action to be taken by other agencies such as State Government, if any, should be covered.

21. The green belt area should be developed in 33% of total lease area, provide time taken for of progressive greenbelt development, plantation and compensatory afforestation clearly indicating the 33% area to be covered under plantation giving detail of local species, width of plantation, plantation schedule etc. along with year wise financial expenditure. The proposal for completion should be within a period of 3 years from the start of mining operation. Information regarding greenbelt development plan shall also be prepared in a tabular form, indicating the location of the area, type of tree and its number supported by a map. In case Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

plantation is not possible in the mining lease area than proposal for plantation on alternate land of area measuring 33% of the lease area should be ensured after due procreation/ identification of such land with due consent of the land owner. Further, existing mining projects should carryout plantation in 33% of lease area and thereafter come for the EC.

22. Budgetary provision for the labours (registered/unregistered/others) working in the mine should be submitted for all necessary infrastructure facilities such as health facility, sanitation facility, and fuel for cooking, along with provision for safe drinking water, monthly medical camps and distribution of medicines, primary education and toilets for women, crèche for infants.

23. Details regarding occupational health impact of the project should be provided. Health study in the surrounding area be carried out covering information regarding prevailing diseases, mortality rate etc. Health and Safety Plan should be prepared and submitted.

24. The P.P. will carry out proper Socio-economic survey of the villages situated in the study area. The details of survey are given informat ‘J’. Based upon its findings and also as per public hearing issues and keeping in view the felt needs of local population, the P.P. will provide adequate budget for carrying out CER activities including provision for toilets for girls in nearby schools, monthly medical camps, and improvement in educational facilities in the nearby schools. Further, existing mining projects should carryout CER for a period of at least one year and thereafter come for the EC.

25. Measures for socio economic influence on the local community due to proposed project to be provided by project proponent. As far as possible, appropriate quantitative dimension to be given. Analysis of job requirements vis-à-vis employability of local population need to be provided.

26. Detailed environmental management plan (EMP) to mitigate the environmental impacts inter- alia including the impact due to change of land use, due to loss of agricultural land and grazing land, if any, should also be submitted besides other impacts of the project. The budgetary provision (both capital and recurring) for implementing the proposed EMP should be clearly spelt out.

27. Points to be raised during Public hearing and commitment of the project proponent on the same along with time bound action plan to implement the commitments and the necessary allocation of funds for the same should be provided.

28. Any litigation pending against the project and /or any direction /order passed by any Court of Law against the project, if so, details thereof should be submitted.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

29. That the Project Proponent shall clearly spell our details of the explosives and blasting to be used, if any, for carrying on mining activity along with the impact of blasting on the environment and safety major to be proposed.

30. Provide details about transfer/allotment of mining lease, extension of lease period etc. along with authenticated copies of orders for lease allotment / transfer / extension of validity period.

31. A balance sheet certified by Authorized Financial Expert to clearly indicate the provision made / amount spent for EMP/ERP/CER/ Safety/Labour welfare/ Legal Obligations etc to be enclosed.

32. PP should clearly mention in the documents whether there is any violation of provisions of EIA Notification and inform at the start of presentation (to be a part of computer presentation also) as per MoEF Notification dated 8.3.2018.

33. The PP shall submit final and authenticated copy of the DSR (District Survey Report) as contemplated under Appendix-X of the EIA Notification 2006.

34. The Environmental Clearance will not be operational till such time the project proponent complies with all the statutory requirements and judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court dated the 2nd August 2017 in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 114 of 2014 in the matter of Common Cause versus Union of India and Ors. 35. State Government concerned shall ensure that mining operation shall not commence till the entire compensation levied, if any, for illegal mining is paid by the Project Proponent through their respective Department of Mining & Geology in strict compliance of judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court dated 2nd August 2017 in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 114 of 2014 in the matter of Common Cause versus Union of India and Ors. 36. Used filter papers (Air monitoring) along with photographs of the site showing Air / Water sampling / monitoring activity / equipment used at each station should be submitted. Original copies of analysis report of all the relevant data referred in the documents should be enclosed. 37. After preparing the draft EIA (as per the generic structure prescribed in Appendix-III of the EIA Notification, 2006 and as amended from time to time ) covering the above mentioned issues, the proponent shall get the public hearing conducted (strictly following the procedure laid down in the Appendix IV of the Amendment Notification dated 01.12.2009 and MoEF circular no. J-15012/29/2010/IA.II (M) dated 19.04.2010, as per amendment, if any). In this regard due care would be taken in (i) deciding the venue of public hearing (at the project site or in its close proximity, to ensure widest possible public participation), (ii) forwarding the Draft EIA Reports with Executive Summary Reports and notice for hearing to various authorities / offices, specifically to Urban Local Bodies/ Panchayati Raj. Institutions (i.e Zila Parishad, Panchayat Samiti & Gram Panchayat)/ Development Authorities (i.e. U.I.T., J.D.A. etc.), (iii) adequate publicity regarding date, place and time of public hearing among local public, (iv) recording requisite “certificate” at the end of public hearing proceedings / report Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

and (v) displaying the report in the office of Gram Panchayat, Zila Parishad, Collectorate etc.(vi) videography of the complete proceedings of the public hearing to be carried out. After completing the public hearing process as described above, the proponent shall take further necessary action for obtaining environmental clearance in accordance with the procedure prescribed under the EIA Notification, 2006 and subsequent amendments.

38. The information regarding the work order/agreement issued by the P.P. to the consultant (Accredited from QCI/ NABET for proposed project Sector) should be submitted along with, (a) Dispatch No. of the work order/agreement, (b) Date of issue of work order (c) Date of start of air/water/other monitoring work (as applicable) and (d) Postal address/ Email Address/ Fax Number/ Mobile Number and Landline Number of the P.P.

Specific ToR:

1. The PP shall conduct Environmental Impact Assessment Study and prepare Environmental Management Plan for the entire cluster in order to capture all the possible externalities. These reports are required to incorporate carrying capacity of the cluster, transportation and related issues, replenishment and recharge issues, geo- hydrological study of the cluster. 2. The EIA/EMP shall be prepared by the state or state nominated agency or group of PP in the cluster or the PP in the cluster. The PP shall get one public consultation done for the entire cluster and after which prepare final EIA/EMP reports.

Points to be included in TOR as per MoEF&CC circular no. J-11013/41/2006-IA.II(I)-Pt. dt. 19.05.2011 regarding Corporate Environmental Responsibility.

1. Does the company have a well laid down Environment Policy approved by its Board of Directors? If so, it may be detailed in the EIA report. 2. Does the Environment Policy prescribed for standard operating process/procedures to bring into focus any infringement/deviation/violation of the Environmental or forest norms /conditions? If so, it may be detailed in the EIA report. 3. What is the hierarchical system or administrative order of the company to deal with the Environmental issues and for ensuring compliance with the EC conditions? Details of this system may be given. 4. Does the company have a system of reporting of non-compliances/violations of Environmental norms to the Board of Directors of the company and /or shareholders or stakeholders at large? This reporting mechanism should be detailed in the EIA report.

Specific ToRs applicable, in the cases of violation in terms of the Notification dated 14.3.2017 and 8.3.2018 and OMs dated 30.5.2018, 4.7.2018 of the MoEF&CC :

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

1. The PP shall undertake assessment of ecological damage, remediation plan and natural and community resource augmentation plan. Such plan shall be prepared as an independent chapter in the Environment Impact Assessment report. The report shall be prepared by the accredited consultant. Collection and analyses of data for assessment of ecological damage, preparation of remediation plan and natural and community resource augmentation plan shall be done by an environmental laboratory duly notified under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 or an environmental Laboratory, accredited by the National Accreditation Board for Testing and Calibration Laboratories or a Laboratory of the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research Institution working in the field of environment. 2. The Environment Management Plan shall comprise remediation plan and natural and community resource augmentation plan corresponding to ecological damage assessed and economic benefit derived due to the violation. 3. The PP shall undertake Final Environment Impact Assessment and prepare Final Environment Management Plan after conducting Public Hearing. 4. The PP shall be required to submit a bank guarantee equivalent to the amount of remediation plan and natural and community resource augmentation plan with the State Pollution Control Board and the PP shall deposit the bank guarantee prior to the grant of Environmental Clearance and which shall be released after successful implementation of the remediation plan and natural and community resource augmentation plan and after recommendation by Regional Office of the Ministry, State Level Expert Appraisal Committee and approval of SEIAA. 5. The project proponent shall give an undertaking by way of affidavit to comply with all the statutory requirements and judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court dated the 2ndAugust 2017 in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 114 of 2014 in the matter of Common Cause versus Union of India and Ors. before grant of ToR/ EC the undertaking inter-alia include commitment of the PP not to repeat any such violation in future. 6. In case of violation of above undertaking, the Environmental Clearance shall be liable to be terminated forthwith as per OM dated 30.5.2018 of the MoEF&CC.

In the final EIA /EMP report , compliance of points of ToRs should be reported point wise in a statement of three columns as indicated below:-

S. No Items in the letter of the ToRs Reply / Response by the PP

Agenda no. 17. File no. F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project / Cat. 1(a)B1 (15607)/ 2019-20

Project Name:- EC for our Proposed Expansion of Mining Project "Quartz & Feldspar Mine (M.L.No-38/2006)" Near village- kharwa, Tehsil-Masuda, District-Ajmer, Rajasthan Promoted by M/S K.K.Mines & Minerals.Area-17.9375 Hect., (P-89398)

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

Proponent Name:- M/S K.K.Mines & Minerals, Add-9 Press Complex, Near Bhagat Choraha, Bewar, Ajmer, [email protected]

Consultant Name:- TEAM Institute of Science & Technology Pvt. Ltd. E-65, Chitranjan marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur

Observations and Resolution of the committee:- The PP vide letter dated 18.05.2019 has requested for withdrawl of the application due to unavoidable situations. The SEAC agreed to the request and resolved to recommend to SEIAA to close and delist the case.

Agenda no. 18. File no. F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project / Cat. 1(a)B1 (15507)/ 2019-20

Project Name:- ToR for mining project “china clay, soap stone & sillca sand mine (M.L. No- 20/83, Renew M.L. No.-60/02)” Village –Bhinai Khera , Tehsil, Mandalgarh, district- Bhilwara , state- Rajasthan , M/S – Deedwaniya & Sons. Area :- 32.37ha Annual Production 8,25,000 TPA khasra no. not given. (Praposal no-78693)

Proponent Name:- M/S – Deedwaniya & Sons Add:- D-4, Nagori Garden, Bhilwara, Raj. E- mail ID. [email protected]

Consultant Name:- TEAM Institute of Science & Technology Pvt. Ltd. E-65, Chitranjan marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur

Observations of the committee:- The PP and the consultant made presenatation of their case on 28.05.2019. The SEAC observed that the PP had obtained EC from the MoEF & CC vide letter dated 21.07.2006 as per 1994 notification for production of 56,000 TPA of China Clay, Soap stone & Silica Sand at mining lease No. 20/83 ( Renewal M.L.no. 60/02) comprising 32.37 hectare located at village Bhinai khera, Tehsil Mandalgarh, District Bhilwara under the EIA notification dated 27.01.1994. The PP has submitted application for revalidation of earlier EC & expansion in production from 56,000 TPA to 8,25,000 TPA. The certified production figures reveal that the production of the mineral in the base year i.e. 1993-94 was 20922.40 TPA. The PP, however, increased production of the mineral in the subsequent years without obtaining prior EC from the regulatory authority in accordance with the EIA notification dated 27.01.1994. It is thus a case of violation of the EIA notification, 1994. The PP in his affidavit dated 30.05.2019 has also admitted that he has committed violation in terms of the judgement of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of Writ Petition Civil No. 114 of 2014, Common Cause Vs Union of India & oth. The project, therefore, requires to be dealt with as a case of violation in accordance with the provision of the notification dated 14.03.2017 and 08.03.2018 of the MoEF & CC and also in accordance with the directions dated 02.08.2017 of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of Common Cause Vs Union of India & oth.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

During presentation on 28.05.2019 the PP requested that they intend to submit requsite remaining documents on 30.05.2019. The PP has submitted the documents on 30.05.2019, however, he has not submitted copy of valid mining plan.

Resolution:

The SEAC in view of above resolved to ask the PP to submit copy of the valid approved mining plan within a period of 45 days from the date of communication in this regards.

Agenda no. 19. File no. F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project / Cat. 1(a)B1 (15508)/ 2019-20

Project Name:- ToR for mining project “Quartz Feldspar & Mica mine M.L-275/05” Village – Dholi ,Tehsil-Asindi, District-Bhilwara, State-Rajasthan , Area :- 49.00ha, Annual Production capcity 33,500 Tonnes khasra No. Not given . (Praposal no-28694)

Proponent Name:- Smt. Sushma Arora, Add:- D-4, Nagori Garden, Bhilwara, Raj. E-mail ID. [email protected]

Consultant Name:- TEAM Institute of Science & Technology Pvt. Ltd. E-65, Chitranjan marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur

Observations of the committee:- The PP and the consultant made presenatation of their case on 28.05.2019. The SEAC observed that the PP had obtained EC from the MoEF & CC vide letter dated 22.08.2006 as per 1994 notification for production of 33,500 TPA of Quartz, Feldspar & Mica at mining lease No. 275/05 comprising 49.0 hectare located at village Dholi, Tehsil Asind, District Bhilwara under the EIA notification dated 27.01.1994. The PP has submitted application for revalidation of earlier EC & expansion in production from 33,500 TPA to 1,35,000 TPA. The certified production figures reveal that the production of the mineral in the base year i.e. 1993-94 was 788 TPA. The PP, however, increased production of the mineral in the subsequent years (2000-2001) without obtaining prior EC from the regulatory authority in accordance with the EIA notification dated 27.01.1994. It is thus a case of violation of the EIA notification, 1994. The PP in his affidavit dated 30.05.2019 has also admitted that he has committed violation in terms of the judgement of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of Writ Petition Civil No. 114 of 2014, Common Cause Vs Union of India & oth. The project, therefore, requires to be dealt with as a case of violation in accordance with the provision of the notification dated 14.03.2017 and 08.03.2018 of the MoEF & CC and also in accordance with the directions dated 02.08.2017 of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of Common Cause Vs Union of India & oth.

During presentation on 28.05.2019 the PP requested that they intend to submit requsite remaining documents on 30.05.2019. The PP has submitted the documents on 30.05.2019.

Resolution:

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

The SEAC after considering the presentation made by the PP and consultant, perusal of record and the affidavit submitted by the PP regarding admission of violation by increasing production of the mineral beyond the level of production made in the base year 1993-94 and view of the aforesaid observations resolved to issue violation ToR with public hearing as per Annexure’B’.

Agenda no. 20. File no. F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project / Cat. 1(a)B2 (15509)/ 2019-20

Project Name:- EC for Mining project “Quartz Feldspar & Mica mine M.L-21/2000” Village – Ruppura ,Tehsil-Asindi, District-Bhilwara ,State-Rajasthan , Area :- 24.78ha Annual Production 1,00,000 TPA khasra no. not given. (Praposal no-28698)

Proponent Name:- M/S-Mineral Deposit Add:- D-4, Nagori Garden, Bhilwara, Raj. E-mail ID. [email protected]

Consultant Name:- TEAM Institute of Science & Technology Pvt. Ltd. E-65, Chitranjan marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur

Observations of the committee:- The PP and the consultant made presenatation of their case on 28.05.2019. The SEAC observed that the PP had obtained EC from the MoEF & CC vide letter dated 17.04.2006 as per 1994 notification for production of 66,872 TPA of Quartz, Feldspar & Mica at mining lease No. 21/2000 comprising 24.78 hectare located at village Rupapura, Tehsil Asind, District Bhilwara under the EIA notification dated 27.01.1994. The PP has submitted application for revalidation of earlier EC & expansion in production from 66,872 TPA to 1,00,000 TPA. The certified production figures reveal that the production of the mineral in the base year i.e. 1993-94 was feldsapar 213 TPA and Quards 1617 TPA (Total= 1830 TPA). The PP, however, increased production of the mineral in the subsequent years without obtaining prior EC from the regulatory authority in accordance with the EIA notification dated 27.01.1994. It is thus a case of violation of the EIA notification, 1994. The PP in his affidavit dated 30.05.2019 has also admitted that he has committed violation in terms of the judgement of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of Writ Petition Civil No. 114 of 2014, Common Cause Vs Union of India & oth. The project, therefore, requires to be dealt with as a case of violation in accordance with the provision of the notification dated 14.03.2017 and 08.03.2018 of the MoEF & CC and also in accordance with the directions dated 02.08.2017 of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of Common Cause Vs Union of India & oth.

During presentation on 28.05.2019 the PP requested that they intend to submit requsite remaining documents on 30.05.2019. The PP has submitted the documents on 30.05.2019.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

Resolution:

The SEAC after considering the presentation made by the PP and consultant, perusal of record and the affidavit submitted by the PP regarding admission of violation by increasing production of the mineral beyond the level of production made in the base year 1993-94 and view of the aforesaid observations resolved to issue violation ToR with public hearing as per Annexure’B’.

Agenda no. 21. File no. F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project / Cat. 1(a)B2 (15664)/ 2019-20

Project Name:- Barna Limestone ( Burning) mining project ( M.L.No-110/1993) with enhancement of production capacity from 6400 TPA (ROM) to 2,70,000 TPA (ROM by lease Shri Bankat Lal Modi located near Village- Barna, Tehsil- Bilara, District -Jodhpur, Rajasthan (ML Area 66.25hect.)-Transfer of file to SEIAA reg. (P-50657)

Proponent Name: - Shri Bankat Lal Modi, R/o-Modi Building, Sojat Road, Pali, State- Rajasthan, [email protected].

Consultant Name:- Apex Mintech Consultant, Add- 3, Dhebar Colony, Near I.T.I Pratapnagar Udaipur, (Raj.) Email:- [email protected], [email protected] [email protected].

Observations and Resolution of the committee:-

The project Barna Limestone (Burning) is located at (M.L.No-110/1993) is B1 project having lease area of 66.25 hectare for enhancement of production capacity from 6400 TPA to 2,70,000 TPA. The MoEF had issued terms of reference on 12.04.2016 and pursuant to which base line data and monitoring data were prepared during March, 2016 to May, 2016 and public hearing was held on 20.02.2017. The project thereafter came under the purview of SEIAA vide notification dated 14.08.2018 of the MoEF & CC. The MoEF & CC has transferred the project to SEIAA vide letter dated 18.12.2018 with the not that as the instant proposal is less than 100 hectare and the same to be dealt with the SEIAA, Rajasthan. Further the MoEF & CC vide letter dated 18.12.2018 has directed the PP to apply for grant of EC to SEIAA with past production figures, duly authenticated by the Department of Mines & Geology, Government of Rajasthan in the prescribed format as per the mining plan/ mining scheme and CTO/CTE since inception of the mine. The PP has also been asked to submit a letter from DMG, Rajasthan to the affect that the mining operation is confined within the mining lease area.

Resolution:-

The PP and the consultant appeared before SEAC for presentation on 28.05.2019 and requested for deferment of the case vide letter dated 28.05.2019. The SEAC considered the request and decided to defer the case for presentation.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

Agenda no. 22. File no. F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project / Cat. 1(a)B2 (15587)/ 2019-20

Project Name: - ToR for Deriya & Bastua Sandstone Cluster Area, Plot No.28, (Plot Area – 1.00 hect) Near village –Deriya, Tehsil- Balesar, District- Jodhpur (Rajasthan) in favor of M/S – Shri Ram Singh Rathore S/O Shri Chatar Singh.(Praposal no-30168)

Proponent Name:- M/S –Shri Ram Singh Rathore S/O Shri Chatar Singh, R/o-Nearby Deriya & Bastua Balesar Sata Tehsil- Balesar, District-Jodhpur,Raj. [email protected].

Consultant Name:- M/S. N.S. ENVIRO-TECH LABORATORIES & CONSULTANT, Add.- Plot No.– A-8 Neha Medical Building ,Opp.,ESI Hospital, Hasanpura Road, Sodala, Jaipur, [email protected]

Observations and Resolution of the committee:-

The SEAC examined and considered the project proposal submitted by the PP and also the presentation made by him during the meeting. The PP has proposed to carry out mining of 76530 TPA (ROM) of sand stone (minor mineral) at plot no. 27 having LOI dated 06.07.2018. Mining plan with respect to the LOI has been approved on 27.11.2018. It is a new project having capital cost of Rs.30 lac. The LOI of the PP is a part of cluster having area of 57.9375 hectare. The SEAC therefore, observed that the PP is required to conduct Environmental Impact Assessment Study and prepare Environmental Management Plan for the entire cluster in order to capture all the possible externalities. These reports are required to incorporate carrying capacity of the cluster, transportation and related issues, replenishment and recharge issues, geo- hydrological study of the cluster. The EIA/EMP may be prepared by the state or state nominated agency or group of PP in the cluster or the PP in the cluster. The SEAC is of the view that the PP should get one public consultation done for the entire cluster and after which prepare final EIA/EMP reports. Keeping in view the presentation made by the PP and examination of documents submitted by him the SEAC prescribed the ToR with public hearing for carrying out detailed EIA and preparing comprehensive EIA report as per the provisions of the EIA notification 2006. The ToR is enclosed at Annexed ‘A’

Agenda no. 23. File no. F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project / Cat. 1(a)B2 (15588)/ 2019-20

Project Name: - ToR for Deriya & Bastua Sandstone Cluster Area, Plot No.77, (Plot Area – 1.00 hect) Near village –Deriya & Bastua, Tehsil- Balesar, District- Jodhpur (Rajasthan) in favor of M/S –Shri jaina Ram S/O Shri Dungar Ram.(Praposal no-30127)

Proponent Name: - Shri Jaina Ram S/O Shri Dungar Ram., R/o-Nearby Deriya & Bastua, Tehsil- Balesar, District-Jodhpur,Raj. Email.-Not Given Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

Consultant Name:- M/S. N.S. ENVIRO-TECH LABORATORIES & CONSULTANT, Add.-Plot No.– A-8 Neha Medical Building ,Opp.,ESI Hospital, Hasanpura Road, Sodala, Jaipur, [email protected]

Observations and Resolution of the committee:-

The SEAC examined and considered the project proposal submitted by the PP and also the presentation made by him during the meeting. The PP has proposed to carry out mining of 66585 TPA (ROM) of sand stone (minor mineral) at plot no. 77 having LOI dated 17.07.2018. Mining plan with respect to the LOI has been approved on 26.11.2018. It is a new project having capital cost of Rs.30 lac. The LOI of the PP is a part of cluster having area of 57.9375 hectare. The SEAC therefore, observed that the PP is required to conduct Environmental Impact Assessment Study and prepare Environmental Management Plan for the entire cluster in order to capture all the possible externalities. These reports are required to incorporate carrying capacity of the cluster, transportation and related issues, replenishment and recharge issues, geo- hydrological study of the cluster. The EIA/EMP may be prepared by the state or state nominated agency or group of PP in the cluster or the PP in the cluster. The SEAC is of the view that the PP should get one public consultation done for the entire cluster and after which prepare final EIA/EMP reports. Keeping in view the presentation made by the PP and examination of documents submitted by him the SEAC prescribed the ToR with public hearing for carrying out detailed EIA and preparing comprehensive EIA report as per the provisions of the EIA notification 2006. The ToR is enclosed at Annexed ‘A .

Agenda no. 24. File no. F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project / Cat. 1(a)B2 (15589)/ 2019-20

Project Name:- ToR for Deriya & Bastua Sandstone Cluster Area, Plot No.31, (Plot Area – 1.00 hect) Near village –Deriya & Bastua, Tehsil- Balesar, District- Jodhpur (Rajasthan) in favor of M/S –Shri jaina Ram S/O Shri Dungar Ram.(Praposal no-30144)

Proponent Name:- Shri jaina Ram S/O Shri Dungar Ram., R/o-Nearby Deriya & Bastua, Tehsil- Balesar, District-Jodhpur,Raj. [email protected].

Consultant Name:- M/S. N.S. ENVIRO-TECH LABORATORIES & CONSULTANT, Add.-Plot No.– A-8 Neha Medical Building ,Opp.,ESI Hospital, Hasanpura Road, Sodala, Jaipur, [email protected]

Observations and Resolution of the committee:-

The SEAC examined and considered the project proposal submitted by the PP and also the presentation made by him during the meeting. The PP has proposed to carry out mining of 58350 TPA (ROM) of sand stone (minor mineral) at plot no. 31 having LOI dated Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

17.07.2018. Mining plan with respect to the LOI has been approved on 26.11.2018. It is a new project having capital cost of Rs.30 lac. The LOI of the PP is a part of cluster having area of 57.9375 hectare. The SEAC therefore, observed that the PP is required to conduct Environmental Impact Assessment Study and prepare Environmental Management Plan for the entire cluster in order to capture all the possible externalities. These reports are required to incorporate carrying capacity of the cluster, transportation and related issues, replenishment and recharge issues, geo- hydrological study of the cluster. The EIA/EMP may be prepared by the state or state nominated agency or group of PP in the cluster or the PP in the cluster. The SEAC is of the view that the PP should get one public consultation done for the entire cluster and after which prepare final EIA/EMP reports Keeping in view the presentation made by the PP and examination of documents submitted by him the SEAC prescribed the ToR with public hearing for carrying out detailed EIA and preparing comprehensive EIA report as per the provisions of the EIA notification 2006. The ToR is enclosed at Annexed ‘A’.

Agenda no. 25. File no. F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project / Cat. 1(a)B2 (15590)/ 2019-20

Project Name: - ToR for Deriya & Bastua Sandstone Cluster Area, Plot No.23, (Plot Area – 1.00 hect) Near village –Deriya, Tehsil- Balesar, District- Jodhpur (Rajasthan) in favor of M/S –Shri Bhawani Singh Rathore S/O Shri Chatar Singh.(Praposal no-30179)

Proponent Name:- Shri Bhawani Singh Rathore S/O Shri Chatar Singh, R/o-Nearby Deriya Tehsil- Balesar, District-Jodhpur, Raj. [email protected]

Consultant Name:- M/S. N.S. ENVIRO-TECH LABORATORIES & CONSULTANT, Add.-Plot No.– A-8 Neha Medical Building ,Opp.,ESI Hospital, Hasanpura Road, Sodala, Jaipur, [email protected]

Observations and Resolution of the committee:-

The SEAC examined and considered the project proposal submitted by the PP and also the presentation made by him during the meeting. The PP has proposed to carry out mining of 62340 TPA (ROM) of sand stone (minor mineral) at plot no. 23 having LOI dated 06.07.2018. Mining plan with respect to the LOI has been approved on 26.11.2018. It is a new project having capital cost of Rs.30 lac. The LOI of the PP is a part of cluster having area of 57.9375 hectare. The SEAC therefore, observed that the PP is required to conduct Environmental Impact Assessment Study and prepare Environmental Management Plan for the entire cluster in order to capture all the possible externalities. These reports are required to incorporate carrying capacity of the cluster, transportation and related issues, replenishment and recharge issues, geo- hydrological study of the cluster. Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

The EIA/EMP may be prepared by the state or state nominated agency or group of PP in the cluster or the PP in the cluster. The SEAC is of the view that the PP should get one public consultation done for the entire cluster and after which prepare final EIA/EMP reports. Keeping in view the presentation made by the PP and examination of documents submitted by him the SEAC prescribed the ToR with public hearing for carrying out detailed EIA and preparing comprehensive EIA report as per the provisions of the EIA notification 2006. The ToR is enclosed at Annexed ‘A’.

Agenda no. 26. File no. F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project / Cat. 1(a)B2 (15591)/ 2019-20

Project Name:- ToR for Deriya & Bastua Sandstone Cluster Area, Plot No.74, (Plot Area – 1.00 hect) Near village –Deriya & Bastua, Tehsil- Balesar, District- Jodhpur (Rajasthan) in favor of M/S –Shri Natha Ram S/O Shri Dungar Ram.(Praposal no-30269)

Proponent Name:- Shri Natha Ram S/O Shri Dungar Ram, R/o-Nearby Deriya Tehsil- Balesar, District-Jodhpur, Raj. [email protected].

Consultant Name:- M/S. N.S. ENVIRO-TECH LABORATORIES & CONSULTANT, Add.-Plot No.– A-8 Neha Medical Building ,Opp.,ESI Hospital, Hasanpura Road, Sodala, Jaipur, [email protected]

Observations and Resolution of the committee:-

The SEAC examined and considered the project proposal submitted by the PP and also the presentation made by him during the meeting. The PP has proposed to carry out mining of 59415 TPA (ROM) of sand stone (minor mineral) at plot no. 74 having LOI dated 06.07.2018. Mining plan with respect to the LOI has been approved on 01.10.2018. It is a new project having capital cost of Rs.30 lac. The LOI of the PP is a part of cluster having area of 57.9375 hectare. The SEAC therefore, observed that the PP is required to conduct Environmental Impact Assessment Study and prepare Environmental Management Plan for the entire cluster in order to capture all the possible externalities. These reports are required to incorporate carrying capacity of the cluster, transportation and related issues, replenishment and recharge issues, geo- hydrological study of the cluster. The EIA/EMP may be prepared by the state or state nominated agency or group of PP in the cluster or the PP in the cluster. The SEAC is of the view that the PP should get one public consultation done for the entire cluster and after which prepare final EIA/EMP reports. Keeping in view the presentation made by the PP and examination of documents submitted by him the SEAC prescribed the ToR with public hearing for carrying out detailed EIA and preparing comprehensive EIA report as per the provisions of the EIA notification 2006. The ToR is enclosed at Annexed ‘A’.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

Agenda no. 27. File no. F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project / Cat. 1(a)B2 (15686)/ 2019-20

Project Name:- ToR for Daruda Masonary Stone Cluster Area, Plot No. 03, (Plot Area- 1.00 Hect.) Near Village- Daruda, Tehsil-Barmer, District- Barmer (Raj.) in favor of M/s. Shri Madan Lal S/o Shri Chaturbhuj Singhal, cluster area-34.94ha, (Praposal No-30519)

Proponent Name:- Madan Lal, Station Road, Barmer, Tehsil & Dist. Barmer Rajasthan, Email. [email protected]

Consultant Name:- M/S. N.S. ENVIRO-TECH LABORATORIES & CONSULTANT, Add.-Plot No.– A-8 Neha Medical Building ,Opp.,ESI Hospital, Hasanpura Road, Sodala, Jaipur, [email protected]

Observations and Resolution of the committee:-

The SEAC examined and considered the project proposal submitted by the PP and also the presentation made by him during the meeting. The PP has proposed to carry out mining of 165750 TPA of sand stone (minor mineral) at plot no. 03 having LOI dated 18.07.2018. Mining plan with respect to the LOI has been approved on 12.11.2018. It is a new project having capital cost of Rs.30 lac. The LOI of the PP is a part of cluster having area of 34.94 hectare. The SEAC therefore, observed that the PP is required to conduct Environmental Impact Assessment Study and prepare Environmental Management Plan for the entire cluster in order to capture all the possible externalities. These reports are required to incorporate carrying capacity of the cluster, transportation and related issues, replenishment and recharge issues, geo- hydrological study of the cluster. The EIA/EMP may be prepared by the state or state nominated agency or group of PP in the cluster or the PP in the cluster. The SEAC is of the view that the PP should get one public consultation done for the entire cluster and after which prepare final EIA/EMP reports. Keeping in view the presentation made by the PP and examination of documents submitted by him the SEAC prescribed the ToR with public hearing for carrying out detailed EIA and preparing comprehensive EIA report as per the provisions of the EIA notification 2006. The ToR is enclosed at Annexed ‘A’.

Agenda no. 28. File no. F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project / Cat. 1(a)B1(15665)/ 2019-20

Project Name:- Submission of Form 1 for the grant of ToR for extension in validity of EC as per MoEF & CC Notification,S.O No.1530 (E) dsted 6th April 2018 for the Ball Clay, Red &Yellow Ochre Mining Project having (M.L.No. 5/2003) located in village: Guda , Tehsil: Kolayat, District: Bikaner, Area-98.0540ha.),khasra no-249,77/2,77/1,82. (P-29339)

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

Proponent Name: - M/S Jai Chand Lal Daga, Add-Labhuju a Katra, 1st Floor, bikaner, state Rajasthan, [email protected], [email protected]

Consultant Name:- Fulgro Environmental & Engineering Services India Pvt. Ltd., Add-27, Ashok Vatika, Khatipura Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur, [email protected]

Observations of the committee:- The PP had obtained EC from the MoEF & CC vide letter dated 31.03.2006 for mining of Ball clay, Fire clay, Red and Yellow Ochre (major minerals before 10.02.2015) 50,000 TPA at mining lease No. 5/2003 comprising 98.0540 hectare located at village Guda, Tehsil Kolayat, District Bikaner under the EIA notification dated 27.01.1994. The certified production figures reveal that the production of the minerals in the base year i.e. 1993-94 was 12702.00 MTA. The PP, however, increased production of the minerals to 13598.00 in the year 1995-96 without obtaining prior EC from the regulatory authority in accordance with the EIA notification dated 27.01.1994. It is thus a case of violation of the EIA notification, 1994. The PP in his affidavit dated 29.05.2019 has admitted that the project activity pertaining to mining lease is in violation of the order dated 02.08.2017 of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of writ petition (civil) 114/2014 Common Cause Vs Union of India & oth. The project, therefore, requires to be dealt with as a case of violation in accordance with the provision of the notification dated 14.03.2017 and 08.03.2018 of the MoEF & CC and also in accordance with the directions dated 02.08.2017 of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of Common Cause Vs Union of India & oth.

Resolution:

The SEAC after considering the presentation made by the PP and consultant, perusal of record and the affidavit submitted by the PP regarding admission of violation of the EIA notification by increasing production of the mineral beyond the level of production made in the base year 1993- 94 and view of the aforesaid observations resolved to issue violation ToR with public hearing as per Annexure’B’.

Agenda no. 29. File no. F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project / Cat. 1(a)B1 (15666)/ 2019-20

Project Name:- Submission of form 1 for the grant of ToR for extension in validity of EC as per MoEF & Cc Notification ,S.O.No.1530 (E) dated 6th April 2018 for the Gudha Fire Clay mining Project having (M.L-No-5/1996) Located in village: Gudha, Tehsil: Kolayat, District-Bikaner. Area-82.25 hect. Khasra no-2,3,4,5,6,7,21,22,23,37,39,24,25,26,27,34,35,36,77,38,72,73, 74,75,76,78,404,65/1. (P-29344)

Proponent Name: - M/S Sampat Lal Daga, Add: Ist FloorLabhuji ka Katla, Bikaner, State- Rajasthan, [email protected]

Consultant Name:- Fulgro Environmental & Engineering Services India Pvt. Ltd., Add.-27, Ashok Vatika, Khatipura Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur, [email protected] Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

Observations of the committee:- The PP had obtained EC from the MoEF & CC vide letter dated 13.09.2006 for mining of Ball clay and Fire clay (major minerals before 10.02.2015) 80,000 TPA at mining lease No. 5/96 comprising 82.25 hectare located at village Guda, Tehsil Kolayat, District Bikaner under the EIA notification dated 27.01.1994. The certified production figures reveal that the production of the minerals in the base year i.e. 1993-94 was 1101.00 MTA. The PP in his affidavit dated 29.05.2019 has admitted that the project activity pertaining to mining lease is in violation of the order dated 02.08.2017 of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of writ petition (civil) 114/2014 Common Cause Vs Union of India & oth. The project, therefore, requires to be dealt with as a case of violation in accordance with the provision of the notification dated 14.03.2017 and 08.03.2018 of the MoEF & CC and also in accordance with the directions dated 02.08.2017 of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of Common Cause Vs Union of India & oth.

Resolution:

The SEAC after considering the presentation made by the PP and consultant, perusal of record and the affidavit submitted by the PP regarding admission of violation of the EIA notification by increasing production of the mineral beyond the level of production made in the base year 1993- 94 and view of the aforesaid observations resolved to issue violation ToR with public hearing as per Annexure ‘B’.

Agenda no. 30. File no. F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project / Cat. 1(a)B2 (15717)/ 2019-20

Project Name:- Environment Clearance of our existing “Abhaypura Soapstone Mine (ML No.:- 30/1986 ; R- 10/1996)” Catering of Rajasthan Mineral & Company having production capacity of 39,000 TPA of Soapstone situated at Village – Abhaypura, Tehsil – Jahazpur, distt.- Bhilwara, Rajasthan, for an area of 34.113 Ha. as per Gazette Notification dated 06.04.2018. Khasra no- 232,233,234,235,236,237,238. (Praposal No-29382)

Proponent Name:- RAJASTHAN MINERAL & Company Authorized Signatory: Sh. Anand Rajgarhia (Partner & POA Holder), 25, Hanuman Nagar, Post – Vaishali, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Email – [email protected]

Consultant Name:- ENKAY ENVIRO SERVICES PVT. LTD., 92 Heera Nagar –A, Near Shalimar Bagh, Ajmer Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Email. – [email protected]

Observations of the committee:- The project M/s Abhaypura Soapstone is an existing project and falls in B1 category. The Project involves activity of mining of Soapstone & waste at M.L.no. 10/96 (old 30/86) with lease area of 34.113 hactare having khasra no. 232 to 238 in Village Abhaypura, Tehsil – Jahazpur, Distt.- Bhilwara, Rajasthan. The PP proposes to mine out Soapstone- 39000 TPA + waste- 9672 TPA. The PP earlier had obtained EC from the MoEF & CC vide letter dated 17.03.2009 under

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

the EIA notification dated 27.01.1994. The cost of the project is Rs. 5.00 crore. The mining plan of the project has been approved on 26.06.2018 by SME, Bhilwara. The PP has applied for ToR as per notification dated 06.04.2018 of the MoEF & CC within the period specified therein. The project does not involve any forest land. The project does not involve approval/ clearance under the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and Wild Life Protection Act, 1972 as no forest land is involved and neither there is any Wild Life Sancturay/ National Park within 10 Km from the project site. The mine is a part of cluster in terms of the provisions of Appendix XI of the EIA notification and total area of all the mine in the cluster is 34.113+32.37+35.75+37.80 = 140.033.The project is one, involved in violation of the EIA notification and attracts norms laid down by Hon’ble Supreme Court in its order dated 02.08.2017 in the matter of Common Cause Vs Union of India & oth. The PP came to be governed by the provisions of the EIA notification 27.01.1994. This notification provided that on and from the date of its publication, expansion or modernization of any activity shall not be undertaken unless it had been accorded EC. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the said matter held that EC is required for expansion/ modernization activity, if the resultant pollution load is to exceed the existing level. For determining the existing level of pollution/production the base year has been taken as 1993-94. The production of Soapstone made by the PP in the year 1993-94 was 2235 TPA. If the PP intended to increase production over and above 2235 TPA he should have obtained prior EC under the EIA notification dated 27.01.1994. The EC was, however, not obtained and the PP increased production in the subsequent year without obtaining EC. The PP obtained EC, for the first time on 17.03.2009, under the EIA notification of 1994. The Hon’ble Supreme Court int the Common Cause matter has clearly held that under 1994 notification, if expansion or modernization of any mining activity exceeds the existing pollution level, a prior EC is necessary. The Hon’ble Court has held that the concept of ex-post-facto or retrospective EC is completely alien to Environmental jurisprudence including EIA 1994 and EIA 2006. The Hon’ble Court further held that section 21(5) of the MMDR Act, relating to compensation is applicable when any person raises, without any lawful authority, any mineral from any land. The SEAC observed that the EC granted by the MoEF & CC to the PP vide letter dated 17.03.2009 recorded that the mining lease area does not fall in the Aravali Hills. The Aravali certificate dated 27.05.2019 issued by ME, Bhilwara and also the composite map issued by the mining engineer says that the area falls in the Aravali Hills, according to directorate order dated 09.01.2006. The Hon’ble Supreme Court by order dated 08.04.2005 in the mater of writ petition no. 202/1995, T.N. Godavarman V/s UOI & oth clearly directed as follows: “Pending further directions, we restrain any kind of mining in forest area. Further we restrain mining in any area in aravali hills falling in the state of Rajasthan where permission may have been accorded after 16 Dec, 2002.” The issue as to whether the project falls in aravali hills or not, is crucial in view of the Hon’ble Supreme Court’s ban on mining in Aravali Hills. The PP therefore, needs to clarify the anomaly in the EC letter dated 17.03.2009 of the MoEF & CC and the aravali certificate and Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

composite map regarding whether the project falls in aravali hills or not. The clarification to be submitted by the PP must bear support of due authentication by the competent authority. The PP has also not submitted map of cluster formed when the distance between the periphery of one lease less than 500 meters from periphery of other lease. The composite map showing mining leases within 500 meter periphery, does not fullfil the requirement of notification dated 15.0.2016 and 01.07.2016 of the MoEF & CC. The PP has also not submitted the report of compliance of conditions of EC granted by the MoEF & CC vide letter dated 17.3.2009, as certified by the MoEF & CC/ RSPCB.

[ Resolution:

The SEAC after considering the presentation made by the PP and consultant, perusal of record and delebration held during presentation resolve to ask the PP to furnish following clarificaitons/ documents with in 45 days from the receipt of communication in this regard:

i. Clarification in regard to anomaly in the EC issued by MoEF & CC and the aravali certificate and cluster map about existence of lease area in Aravali Hills as indicated above. ii. Cluster map as per the provisions of Appendix XI of the EIA notification as indicated above. iii. Copy of compliance report of conditions of EC granted by the MoEF & CC vide letter dated 17.3.2009, as certified by the MoEF & CC/ RSPCB.

Agenda no. 31. File no. F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project / Cat. 1(a)B1(15725)/ 2019-20

Project Name:- Reg. Validation of Environment Clearance of our existing “Handla-Bhatian Ball Clay, Fire Clay, Red. Clay and Yellow Ochre Mine (Ml No. 45/05) of Daulat singh & Sons having production capacity of 50,000 TPA situated at Village- Handia- Bhatian, Tehsil- Kolayat, Distt.- Bikaner, (Raj.) for an area of 95.99177 Ha. as per Gazatted Notification dated 06.04.2018. (Praposal No-29358)

Proponent Name:- Daulat Singh & Sons Authorized Signatory : - Mr. Ranjeet Singh (Authorized Signatory) R/o 151, Gandhi Nagar, Bikaner Distt. Bikaner, (Raj.) Email. [email protected]

Consultant Name:- ENKAY ENVIRO SERVICES PVT. LTD., 92 Heera Nagar –A, Near Shalimar Bagh, Ajmer Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Email. – [email protected]

Observations of the committee:- The project Handla- Bhatian Ball Clay, Fire Clay, Red. Clay and Yellow Ochre Mine (Ml No. 45/05) of Daulat singh & Sons is an existing project and falls in B1 category. The Project involves activity of mining of Ball Clay, Fire Clay, Red Clay and Yellow Ochre at M.L.no. 45/05 with lease area of 95.99177 hactare having khasra no. 12, 13, 45, 46, 47,75, 76, 77, 79, 80, 81, Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

83, 84, 85, 97, 98, 109, 111, 112 and 113 in Village- Handia- Bhatian, Tehsil- Kolayat, Distt.- Bikaner (Raj.). The PP proposes to mine out the said minerals to the tune of - 50000 TPA. The PP had earlier obtained EC from the MoEF & CC vide letter dated 20.01.2006 under the EIA notification dated 27.01.1994 for carrying on mining of 50000 TPA of the said mineral. The cost of the project is Rs. 1.00 crore. The mining plan of the project has been approved on 28.09.2018 by SME, Bikaner. The PP has applied for ToR as per notification dated 06.04.2018 of the MoEF & CC within the period specified therein. The project does not involve any forest land. The project does not involve approval/ clearance under the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and Wild Life Protection Act, 1972 as no forest land is involved and neither there is any Wild Life Sancturay/ National Park within 10 Km from the project site. The mine is a part of cluster in terms of the provisions of Appendix XI of the EIA notification and total area of all the mine in the cluster. The PP has, however, not mentioned the size of cluster. The project is one, involved in violation of the EIA notification and attracts norms laid down by Hon’ble Supreme Court in its order dated 02.08.2017 in the matter of Common Cause Vs Union of India & oth. The PP came to be governed by the provisions of the EIA notification 27.01.1994. This notification provided that on and from the date of its publication, expansion or modernization of any activity shall not be undertaken unless it had been accorded EC. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the said matter held that EC is required for expansion/ modernization activity, if the resultant pollution load is to exceed the existing level. For determining the existing level of pollution/production the base year has been taken as 1993-94. The production of said minerals made by the PP in the year 1993-94 was 834 MTPA. If the PP intended to increase production over and above 534 MTPA he should have obtained prior EC under the EIA notification dated 27.01.1994. The EC was, however, not obtained and the PP increased production in the subsequent years without obtaining EC. The PP obtained EC, for the first time on 20.01.2006, under the EIA notification of 1994. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the Common Cause matter has clearly held that under 1994 notification, if expansion or modernization of any mining activity exceeds the existing pollution level, a prior EC is necessary. The Hon’ble Court has held that the concept of ex-post-facto or retrospective EC is completely alien to Environmental jurisprudence including EIA 1994 and EIA 2006. The Hon’ble Court further held that section 21(5) of the MMDR Act, relating to compensation is applicable when any person raises, without any lawful authority, any mineral from any land. The SEAC observed that PP has not submitted map of cluster formed when the distance between the periphery of one lease is less than 500 meters from periphery of other lease in terms of notification dated 15.01.2016 and 01.07.2016 of the MoEF & CC. The composite map showing mining leases within 500 meter periphery, does not fullfil the requirement of notification dated 15.0.2016 and 01.07.2016 of the MoEF & CC. The SEAC noted that the report dated 12.07.2018 of the MoEF & CC regarding certification of compliance of conditions of EC granted by the MoEF & CC on 20.01.2006 speaks volumes about violation of EC conditions. The report says that topsoil and OB dumps are stacked collectively, no plantation has been done around OB dumps, project authorities are not Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

regularly submitting compliance status of conditions stipulated in EC to the RO (MoEF & CC), no plantation except natural, found around M.L. area and roads, no check dams, siltation pond and garland drains constructed around mining area, no peizeometer installed at project site etc. The details of non compliance of EC conditions are given in the MoEF report dated 12.07.2018 which is enclosed as Appendix III of the documents submitted by the PP vide letter dated 15.05.2019. The SEAC observed that the PP is carrying on mining for the last 13 years in violation of the conditions of EC granted by the MoEF & CC vide letter dated 20.01.2006.

[ Resolution:

The SEAC after considering the presentation made by the PP and consultant, perusal of record and delebration held during presentation resolved to ask the PP to make compliance of the condition of EC issued by the MoEF & CC vide letter dated 20.01.2016 and get the same certified by the MoEF & CC for the reason that MoEF & CC during inspection on 12.07.2018 had noted large scale violation of conditionsof EC and submit complete compliance reports certified by the MoEF & CC. The PP shall also submit Cluster map as per the provisions of Appendix XI of the EIA notification. The PP shall submit the above report/ documents with in 45 days from the receipt of communication in this regard.

Agenda no. 32. File no. F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project / Cat. 1(a)B2 (15559)/ 2019-20

Project Name:- EC.for Quartz, Feldspar & Mica Mining Lease M.L.no. 06/78, 13/2001® Area 7.88Ha. Production Capacity of Quartz, Feldspar & Mica(Rom) 14820 Tonnes per annum (Quartz 4683 TPA , Feldspar 7114 TPA, & Mica 59 TPA ) at near village- Gulgaon, Tehsil:- Malpura, District :- Tonk Rajasthan. (Praposal no-83833)

Proponent Name:- M/s. Jain Minerals. Add:- 36, Kishangarh kothi, Jaipur Road, Ajmer (Raj) Email:- [email protected]

Consultant Name:- TM Enviro Consultancy Services.

Observations and Resolution of the committee:-

The PP had applied on 01.11.2018 for EC for carrying on mining of Quartz, Feldspar & Mica Mining Lease no. 06/78, 13/2001(R ), Area 7.88Ha. for producing Quartz, Feldspar & Mica (Rom) 14820 Tones per annum (Quartz 4683 TPA , Feldspar 7114 TPA, & Mica 59 TPA ) at near village- Gulgaon, Tehsil:- Malpura, District :- Tonk Rajasthan. The PP was called for presentation of their case on 31.01.2019. The PP, however, vide letter dated 30.01.2019 requested for postponement of presentation due to some unavoidable circumstances. The SEAC agreed to the request of PP and adjourned the case. As per the request made by the PP, the project was fixed for presentation today on 29.05.2019. Neither the PP nor his consultant was present during presentation. In view of continue absence of the PP for presentation the SEAC resolved to recommend to SEIAA to close and delist the case.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

Agenda no. 33. File no. F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project / Cat. 1(a)B2 (15560)/ 2019-20

Project Name:- EC.for Quartz, Feldspar & Mining Lease M.L.no. 06/80, 22/01® Area 19.0Ha., Khasra no. not given Production Capacity of 4000 TPA at near village- Kishanpura, Tehsil:- Beawer, District :- Ajmer (Rajasthan.)(Praposal no-76012)

Proponent Name:- M/s Rajasthan Minerals Supply Works Smt. Kanta Jain W/o. Late Shri Mahavir Chand Jain Add:- H.NO. 75, Anupam Ashok Marg, Ajmer E-Mail:- [email protected]

Consultant Name:- TM Enviro Consultancy Services.

Observations and Resolution of the committee:-

The PP had applied on 01.11.2018 for EC for carrying on mining of Quartz & Feldspar M.L.no. 06/80, 22/01(R), Area 19.0Ha., for producing Quartz & Feldspar 4000 TPA at near village- Kishanpura, Tehsil:- Beawer, District :- Ajmer (Rajasthan.) The PP was called for presentation of their case on 31.01.2019. The PP, however, vide letter dated 30.01.2019 requested for postponement of presentation due to some unavoidable circumstances. The SEAC agreed to the request of PP and adjourned the case. As per the request made by the PP, the project was fixed for presentation today on 29.05.2019. Neither the PP nor his consultant was present during presentation. In view of continue absence of the PP for presentation the SEAC resolved to recommend to SEIAA to close and delist the case.

Agenda no. 34. File no. F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project / Cat. 1(a)B2 (15581)/ 2019-20 Project Name:- EC for " Quartz, Feldspar , Emerald & Beryl Mining Lease (ML NO. 07/93, ML Area 46.32ha.Production Capcity - Quartz; 18000 TPA, Feldspar ; 2000 TPA Near Village - Rajgarh, Tehsil- Nasirabad, District - Ajmer , Rajasthan of M/s Mining & Mineral Industries (Prop. Sh. Arvind Kumar Sethi. (Praposal no-81545)

Proponent Name:- M/s Mining & Mineral Industries (Prop. Sh. Arvind Kumar Sethi S/o. Sh. HukumChand Sethi) Add:- 36, Kishangarh kothi jaipur Road Ajmer (Raj) Email:- [email protected]

Consultant Name:- TM Enviro Consultancy Services.

Observations and Resolution of the committee:-

The PP had applied on 28.11.2018 for EC for carrying on mining of Quartz, Feldspar, Emerald & Beryl (ML NO. 07/93, ML Area 46.32 ha., for producing Quartz- 18000 TPA & Feldspar- 2000 TPA at Near Village - Rajgarh, Tehsil- Nasirabad, District - Ajmer, Rajasthan. The PP was called for presentation of their case on 31.01.2019. The PP, however, vide letter dated 30.01.2019 requested for postponement of presentation due to some unavoidable circumstances. The SEAC agreed to the request of PP and adjourned the case. As per the request made by the

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

PP, the project was fixed for presentation today on 29.05.2019. Neither the PP nor his consultant was present during presentation. In view of continue absence of the PP for presentation the SEAC resolved to recommend to SEIAA to close and delist the case.

Agenda no. 35. File no. F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project / Cat. 1(a)B2 (15595)/ 2019-20

Project Name:- Submission of Application for ToR (Form I along with pre Feasibility Report) of Mining Project of Soapstone Mine, M.L.No-02/1988, comprising area of 47.96 Hectares near Village Dewal, Tehsil & Dungarpur in Rajasthan. Khasara No-10904/1452 Praposal No-29967)

Proponent Name:- M/S Jai Minerals & Industries ,R/O-03, Dhan Mandi, Udaipur (Raj), Email- [email protected]

Consultant Name:- R.K.Consultants, R/O-17 E/777,CHB,JODHPUR,(RAJASTHAN), Email- [email protected]

Observations and Resolutionof the committee:- The PP had obtained EC from the SEIAA vide letter dated 25.03.2010 for mining of Soapstone (major minerals before 10.02.2015) 18,000 MT/ year at mining lease No. 2/88 (Renewal no. 08/2007) comprising 47.96 hectare located at Village Dewal, Tehsil & District Dungarpur under the EIA notification dated 14.09.2006. The PP has now applied for increasing production of Soapstone from 18,000 TPA to 1,00,000 TPA and requested for issuance of Terms of Reference (ToR). During appraisal of the project the SEAC observed that several documents like approved mining plan, certified production figures since 1993-94, certified compliance reports of earlier EC, plantation details, district servey report and other documents which are essential for appraisal of project have not been submitted. The PP agreed to it and requested to defer the matter for submission of the requisite documents. The consultant of the PP vide letter dated 30.05.2019 has requested to defer the case for submission of the documents.

Agenda no. 36. File no. F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project / Cat. 1(a)B2 (15650)/ 2019-20

Project Name:- Submission of Application for EC ( Form I Along with pre Feasibility Report) of Mining Project of Limestone Mine , M.L.No-47/80 & R.L.No-195/90, comprising Area-100 Hect., Near village Borunda, Tehsil- Bilara, District-Jodhpur in Rajasthan. (Praposal No-30600)

Proponent Name:- M/S Radhey Chemicals, R/o-Ground Floor, Jodhpur Tower, Dharam Narayan ji ka Hatha, Paota, Jodhpur. [email protected]

Consultant Name:- M/S R.K.Consultants, 17E/777, C.H.B, Jodhpur-Rajasthan, Email- [email protected]

Observations and Resolutionof the committee:- The PP had obtained EC from the MoEF & CC vide letter dated 28.11.2016 for mining of Lime stone (major minerals before 10.02.2015) 10,00,00 TPA at mining lease No. 47/80 comprising Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

100 hectare located at Village Borunda, Tehsil Bilara, District Jodhpur under the EIA notification dated 14.09.2006. The PP has now applied for increasing production of Lime stone from 1,00,000 TPA to 10,00,000 TPA and requested for issuance of Terms of Reference (ToR). During appraisal of the project the SEAC observed that several documents like old file from MoEF & CC, cluster map issued by the mining department, certified compliance reports of earlier EC conditions, plantation details, Arawali certificate, production figures in ROM, district servey report and other documents which are essential for appraisal of project have not been submitted. The PP agreed to it and requested to defer the matter for submission of the requisite documents. The consultant of the PP vide letter dated 30.05.2019 has requested to defer the case for submission of the documents.

Agenda no. 37. File no. F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project / Cat. 1(a)B2 (124)/ 2019-20

Project Name:- Submission of Application for EC ( Form I Along with pre Feasibility Report) of Mining Project of Sandstone Mine with Crusher, M.L.No-02/2007,comprising Area 22.793hect. near Village-Bhuteshwar ki Gal (Choukari), Tehsil-Bhopalgarh,District-Jodhpur in Rajasthan. (P-90286)

Proponent Name:- Shri Ummed Singh, Add-Village & Post-Khangta, Tehsil-Bhopalgarh, District-Jodhpur (Raj). [email protected]

Consultant Name:- M/S R.K.Consultants, 17E/777, C.H.B, Jodhpur-Rajasthan, Email- [email protected]

Observations and Resolution of the committee:- The consultant vide letter dated 22.05.2019 has informed that due to unavoidable circumstences, the PP is unable to present his case before SEAC and requested to defer the case for presentation.

Agenda no. 38. File no. F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project / Cat. 1(a)B2 (15525)/ 2019-20

Project Name:- EC for Mining Project of Siliceous Earth Mine, M.L.no. 02/85, comprising area of 51.03 he.Production capacity 9360 TPA Khasra no. not given Near village - Murad ki Dhani, Tehsil- Sheo, Dist- Barmer ,Raj. (Praposal no-29334)

Proponent Name:- M/s. PP Enterprises Add:- Saturday shopee, E-Sector, Shastri nagar, Kalpataru Shopping Centre, Jodhpur (Raj.) E-mail:- [email protected]

Consultant Name:- R.K. Consultants (NABET Accredited consultant Organization), Add- 17 E/403 C.H.B, Jodhpur (Raj.) Email:- [email protected]

Observations and Resolutionof the committee:- The PP had obtained EC from the MoEF & CC vide letter dated 02.01.2009 for mining of Siliceous earth (major minerals before 10.02.2015) 9,360 TPA at mining lease No. 2/1985 comprising 51.03 hectare located at Village Murad Ki Dhani, Tehsil Sheo, District Barmer under Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

the EIA notification dated 14.09.2006. The PP has now applied for revalidation of earlier EC for the same production and requested for issuance of Terms of Reference (ToR). The certified production figures reveal that the production of Siliceous earth in the base year i.e. 1993-94 was 1105.49 MTA. The PP, however, increased production of Siliceous earth in the subsequent years without obtaining prior EC from the regulatory authority in accordance with the EIA notification dated 27.01.1994. It is thus a case of violation of the EIA notification, 1994. The project, therefore, requires to be dealt with as a case of violation in accordance with the provision of the notification dated 14.03.2017 and 08.03.2018 of the MoEF & CC and also in accordance with the directions dated 02.08.2017 of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of Common Cause Vs Union of India & oth. During appraisal of the project the SEAC observed that several documents like cluster map issued by the mining department, Arawali certificate, certified compliance reports of earlier EC conditions, plantation details, production figures in ROM, district servey report and other documents which are essential for appraisal of project have not been submitted. The PP agreed to it and requested to defer the matter for submission of the requisite documents. The consultant of the PP vide letter dated 30.05.2019 has requested to defer the case for submission of the documents.

Agenda no. 39. File no. F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project / Cat. 1(a)B2 (15526)/ 2019-20

Project Name:- EC for Mining Project of Soap stone, Mining project of M/s Vijai Singh Khimesara (Now- M/s Singh Mining Company) Located in village- Jhunthri, tehsil - Kherwara, District - Udaipur (M.L. No- 1/1996), Area 24.17 hectare Production Capacity - 40,000 TPA Khasra No. not given.(Praposal no-80544)

Proponent Name:- M/s Singh Mining Company Add: - Opposite Bhagyodaua Hotel, N.H. -8- Badla, Tehsil- Kherwara, District - Udaipur (Raj.) Email- [email protected]

Consultant Name:- R.K. Consultants (NABET Accredited consultant Organization), Add- 17 E/403 C.H.B, Jodhpur (Raj.) Email:- [email protected]

Observations and Resolutionof the committee:- The PP had obtained EC from the MoEF & CC vide letter dated 10.08.2006 for mining of Soapstone (major minerals before 10.02.2015) 40,000 TPA at mining lease No. 1/1996 comprising 24.17 hectare located at Village Jhunthri, Tehsil Kherwara, District Udaipur under the EIA notification dated 14.09.2006. The PP has now applied for revalidation of earlier EC for the same production and requested for issuance of Terms of Reference (ToR). During appraisal of the project the SEAC observed that several documents like Arawali certificate, certified compliance reports of earlier EC conditions, plantation details, production figures in ROM, district servey report and other documents which are essential for appraisal of project have not been submitted. The PP agreed to it and requested to defer the matter for submission of the requisite documents. The consultant of the PP vide letter dated 30.05.2019 has requested to defer the case for submission of the documents. Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

Agenda no. 40. File no. F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project / Cat. 1(a)B2 (15461)/ 2019-20 Project Name:- Environmental Clearance for Sandstone Quarry, QL No. 19 , area 0.18 hect khasra no-nil, near village Balesar , Tehsil- Baleser, District – Jodhpur in Rajasthan. Production capacity-1800 TPA. (Praposal no-72783)

Proponent Name:- Sh. Bhagat singh s/o sujan singh Jat R/o-38, Sharma Colony, 22, Godam Ward No. 16, Tehsil&District- jaipur [email protected]

Consultant Name:- R.K. Consultants (NABET Accredited consultant Organization), Add- 17 E/403 C.H.B, Jodhpur (Raj.) Email:- [email protected]

Observations and Resolution of the committee:-

The PP had applied on 22.02.2018 for EC for carrying on mining of Sand stone, QL No. 19, area 0.18 hect, near village Balesar, Tehsil- Baleser, District – Jodhpur. The PP was called for presentation of their case on 28-30.11.2018. Neither the PP nor his consultant was present during presentation. Again the PP or his consultant did not appear before SEAC for presentation in this meeting. In view of continued absence of the PP for presentation, the SEAC, resolved to recommend to SEIAA to close and delist the case.

Agenda no. 41. File no. F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project / Cat. 1(a)B2 (15462)/ 2019-20

Project Name:- Environmental Clearance for Sandstone Quarry, QL No. 28 , area 0.18 hect khasra no-nil, near village Balesar , Tehsil- Baleser, District – Jodhpur in Rajasthan. Production capacity-1800 TPA.(Praposal no-72782)

Proponent Name:- Sh. Bhagat singh s/o sujan singh Jat R/o-38, Sharma Colony, 22, Godam Ward No. 16, Tehsil&District- jaipur [email protected]

Consultant Name:- R.K. Consultants (NABET Accredited consultant Organization), Add- 17 E/403 C.H.B, Jodhpur (Raj.) Email:- [email protected]

Observations and Resolution of the committee:-

The PP had applied on 22.02.2018 for EC for carrying on mining of Sand stone, QL No. 28, area 0.18 hect, near village Balesar, Tehsil- Baleser, District – Jodhpur. The PP was called for presentation of their case on 28-30.11.2018. Neither the PP nor his consultant was present during presentation. Again the PP or his consultant did not appear before SEAC for presentation in this meeting. In view of continued absence of the PP for presentation, the SEAC, resolved to recommend to SEIAA to close and delist the case.

Agenda no. 42. File no. F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project / Cat. 1(a)B2 (15463)/ 2019-20 Project Name:- Environmental Clearance for Sandstone Quarry, QL No. 30 , area 0.18 hect khasra no-nil, near village Balesar , Tehsil- Baleser, District – Jodhpur in Rajasthan. Production capacity-1800 TPA.(Praposal no-72793) Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

Proponent Name:- Renu singh D/O Mahaveer Singh Jat R/o-38, Sharma Colony, 22, Godam Ward No. 16, Tehsil&District- jaipur [email protected]

Consultant Name:- R.K. Consultants (NABET Accredited consultant Organization), Add- 17 E/403 C.H.B, Jodhpur (Raj.) Email:- [email protected]

Observations and Resolution of the committee:-

The PP had applied on 22.02.2018 for EC for carrying on mining of Sandstone, QL No. 30, area 0.18 hect, near village Balesar, Tehsil- Baleser, District – Jodhpur. The PP was called for presentation of their case on 28-30.11.2018. Neither the PP nor his consultant was present during presentation. Again the PP or his consultant did not appear before SEAC for presentation in this meeting. In view of continued absence of the PP for presentation, the SEAC, resolved to recommend to SEIAA to close and delist the case.

Agenda no. 43. File no. F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project / Cat. 1(a)B2 (15464)/ 2019-20

Project Name:- Environmental Clearance for Sandstone Quarry, QL No. 18 , area 0.18 hect khasra no-nil, near village Balesar , Tehsil- Baleser, District – Jodhpur in Rajasthan. Production capacity-1800 TPA.(Praposal no-72835)

Proponent Name:- Renu singh D/O Mahaveer Singh Jat R/o-38, Sharma Colony, 22, Godam Ward No. 16, Tehsil&District- jaipur [email protected]

Consultant Name:- R.K. Consultants (NABET Accredited consultant Organization), Add- 17 E/403 C.H.B, Jodhpur (Raj.) Email:- [email protected]

Observations and Resolution of the committee:-

The PP had applied on 22.02.2018 for EC for carrying on mining of Sand stone, QL No. 18, area 0.18 hect, near village Balesar, Tehsil- Baleser, District – Jodhpur. The PP was called for presentation of their case on 28-30.11.2018. Neither the PP nor his consultant was present during presentation. Again the PP or his consultant did not appear before SEAC for presentation in this meeting. In view of continued absence of the PP for presentation, the SEAC, resolved to recommend to SEIAA to close and delist the case.

Agenda no. 44. File no. F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project / Cat. 1(a)B2 (15465)/ 2019-20

Project Name:- Environmental Clearance for Sandstone Quarry, QL No. 34 , area 0.18 hect khasra No.- nil, near village Balesar , Tehsil- Baleser, District – Jodhpur in Rajasthan. Production capacity-1800 TPA.(Praposal no-72813)

Proponent Name:- Sh.Sujan Singh Jat S/O-Samandar Singh Jat R/o-Virharu, Tehsil- Kumhare, District- Bharatpur. E-mail- [email protected]

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

Consultant Name:- R.K. Consultants (NABET Accredited consultant Organization), Add- 17 E/403 C.H.B, Jodhpur (Raj.) Email:- [email protected]

Observations and Resolution of the committee:-

The PP had applied on 22.02.2018 for EC for carrying on mining of Sand stone, QL No. 34, area 0.18 hect, near village Balesar, Tehsil- Baleser, District – Jodhpur. The PP was called for presentation of their case on 28-30.11.2018. Neither the PP nor his consultant was present during presentation. Again the PP or his consultant did not appear before SEAC for presentation in this meeting. In view of continued absence of the PP for presentation, the SEAC, resolved to recommend to SEIAA to close and delist the case.

Agenda no. 45. File no. F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project / Cat. 1(a)B2 (15466)/ 2019-20

Project Name:- Environmental Clearance for Sandstone Quarry, QL No. 33 , area 0.18 hect khasra No.- nil, near village Balesar , Tehsil- Baleser, District – Jodhpur in Rajasthan. Production capacity-1800 TPA.(Praposal no-72785)

Proponent Name:- sh. Bhagat singh s/o sujan singh Jat R/o-38, Sharma Colony, 22, Godam Ward No. 16, Tehsil&District- jaipur [email protected]

Consultant Name:- R.K. Consultants (NABET Accredited consultant Organization), Add- 17 E/403 C.H.B, Jodhpur (Raj.) Email:- [email protected]

Observations and Resolution of the committee:-

The PP had applied on 22.02.2018 for EC for carrying on mining of Sand stone, QL No. 33, area 0.18 hect, near village Balesar, Tehsil- Baleser, District – Jodhpur. The PP was called for presentation of their case on 28-30.11.2018. Neither the PP nor his consultant was present during presentation. Again the PP or his consultant did not appear before SEAC for presentation in this meeting. In view of continued absence of the PP for presentation, the SEAC, resolved to recommend to SEIAA to close and delist the case.

Agenda no. 46. File no. F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project / Cat. 1(a)B2 (15467)/ 2019-20

Project Name:- Environmental Clearance for Sandstone Quarry, QL No. 08 , area 0.18 hect khasra No.- nil, near village Balesar , Tehsil- Baleser, District – Jodhpur in Rajasthan. Production capacity-1800 TPA.(Praposal no-72791)

Proponent Name:- Rajendra Kumar Jain S/o Bhanwar Lal Jain R/O-D-25 Lal Bahadur Nagar,Malviya Nagar, Tehsil&District- jaipur [email protected]

Consultant Name:- R.K. Consultants (NABET Accredited consultant Organization), Add- 17 E/403 C.H.B, Jodhpur (Raj.) Email:- [email protected]

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

Observations and Resolution of the committee:-

The PP had applied on 22.02.2018 for EC for carrying on mining of Sand stone, QL No. 08, area 0.18 hect, near village Balesar, Tehsil- Baleser, District – Jodhpur. The PP was called for presentation of their case on 28-30.11.2018. Neither the PP nor his consultant was present during presentation. Again the PP or his consultant did not appear before SEAC for presentation in this meeting. In view of continued absence of the PP for presentation, the SEAC, resolved to recommend to SEIAA to close and delist the case.

Agenda no. 47. File no. F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project / Cat. 1(a)B2 (15535)/ 2019-20

Project Name:- Expansion in production Capacity of Girota Silica Sand (Minor Mineral) Mining Project, ( ML No. 02/93), Area:- 8.645 ha, Production Capacity :- 30,000 TPA, to 3,68,780 TPA Silica Sand & 1,12,890 TPA, Khasra No.104 old, 134,new, & 195 old, 278 new, Add:- Village -Girota, Tehsil- Sakrai, Distt. - Dausa, (Raj.) (Praposal no-80318)

Proponent Name:- M/S NINATH SILICA, Near Bus Stand, Opposite Prabhat Loan Agra Road, Dausa, Corresponded Address- Shri Rajesh Bhardwaj, Add- 528, Alankar Plaza, Central Spine, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Distt.- Jaipur, (Raj.), Email:- [email protected]

Consultant Name:- Vardan Environet Add:- D-142, sushant lok IIIrd Gurugram

Observations and Resolution of the committee:-

The PP had applied on 03.10.2018 for EC for carrying on mining of Silica Sand Mining Lease no. 02/93, Area 8.645 Ha. for expansion from 30,000 TPA to 3,68,780 TPA of Silica Sand and 1,12,890 TPA of overburden at near village- Girota, Tehsil:- Sakaria, District :- Dausa Rajasthan. The PP was called for presentation of their case on 30.01.2019. The PP, however, vide letter dated 30.01.2019 requested for postponement of presentation due to some unavoidable circumstances. The SEAC agreed to the request of PP and adjourned the case. As per the request made by the PP, the project was fixed for presentation today on 30.05.2019. Neither the PP nor his consultant was present during presentation. In view of continue absence of the PP for presentation the SEAC resolved to recommend to SEIAA to close and delist the case.

Agenda no. 48. File no. F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project / Cat. 1(a)B2 (15531)/ 2019-20

Project Name:- E. C. for Samod Silica Sand Mining Project (ML.NO. 02/1996), Area:-12.439 Ha. Annual Production :- 32,500 TPA, Khasra No. – Not given, Village – Samod, Tehsil- Chomu , Distt. – Jaipur, (Raj.)(Praposal no-81478)

Proponent Name:- M/S Mahalaxmi Minerals, Add- Thandi Piyoo, Tripoliya Bazar, Distt.- Jaipur, (Raj.), Email:- [email protected],

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

Consultant Name:- ENVIRTA Environment Consulting & Research Organization, As per QCI NABET ‘List of Accredited Consultant Organizations/ Rev. 28/ Dec. 05, 2015’, listed in as Accredited Consultant, Category ‘A’ SI. No. 47

Observations and Resolution of the committee:-

The PP had applied on 05.10.2018 for EC for carrying on mining of Silica Sand Mining Lease no. 02/1996, Area 12.439 Ha. for production of 32,500 TPA of Silica sand at near village- Samod, Tehsil:- Chomu, District :- Jaipur Rajasthan. The PP was called for presentation of their case on 28-31.01.2019. The PP, however, vide letter dated 28.01.2019 had requested for postponement of presentation due to some unavoidable circumstances. The SEAC agreed to the request of PP and adjourned the case. The PP again did not appear for presentation 0n 30.05.2019. In view of continue absence of the PP for presentation the SEAC resolved to recommend to SEIAA to close and delist the case.

Agenda no. 49. File no. F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project / Cat. 1(a)B2 (15703)/ 2019-20

Project Name:- Environmental Clearance of Khangar Khet Masonry Stone & Limestone Mine with Crusher ( M.L. No. 03/1995) Mining Lease Area: 4.60 Hect. Located near Village- Khangar Khet, Tehsil- Raipur, Distt.– Pali, Rajasthan, (Proposal No-93008)

Proponent Name:- M/s DHARTIPUTRA MINES, R/o 143 -B, Aadarsh Nagar, Distt.- Pali, Rajasthan. Email.- [email protected]

Consultant Name:- ENVIRTA Environment Consulting & Research Organization, As per QCI NABET ‘ List of Accredited Consultant Organizations/ Rev. 28/ Dec. 05, 2015’, listed in as Accredited Consultant, Category ‘A’ SI. No. 47

Observations and Resolution of the committee:- Authorized signatory of the PP and the consultant were present during presentation on 30.05.2019. Application dated 30.05.2019 has been submitted by the authorized signatory requesting to defer the case for the next meeting. The SEAC accept the request and deferred the matter for the next meeting.

Additional Agenda:

S.NO SEAC. Project Name Proponent Name/ Consultant Name NO. 1. 15568 EC for proposed "Navkar Proponent Name:-Navkar Prime Residency & Navkar Homes" Developers Private Limited, Pavan Kumar affordable group housing jain (Managing Director) Add:- 1/511-512, project at village Sonkhar, kala kua, Housing Board, Arawali Vihar, kherli, Tehsil Kathumar, , Rajasthan. Email:- District Alwar, Rajasthan. [email protected] Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

Name of the Consultant: - Superintendence Company of India (P) Limited Add:- Plot no. Y-23, Block EP, Sector V, Salt Lake, Kolkata

2. 15567 EC for proposed a Commercial Proponent Name:-M/s Eternal Home cum Residential Complex Developers LLP Mr. Prashant Gupta "Manhattan" at Plot no. 1to8, at (Partner) Add:- F32, Azad Marg, behind Mahal Road Scheme - BJP Office C-Scheme, Jaipur. E-Mail:- Ramchandrapura Jagatpura, [email protected] Jaipur Rajasthan. Name of the consultant: - Enviro Concept (I) Pvt Ltd. Add:- 1/3 A, Yudhister Marg, C-Scheme, jaipur E-mail:- [email protected]

3. 2720 Environmental Clearance for Proponent Name- M/s Shree Ram Mines our project “Sarah Bhiyani & Minerals, B7, Murlidhar Vyas Colony (M.L. No. 46/2009), area- 4.7 Bikaner, Rajasthan, E mail- hectare, Ball Clay Mining [email protected], Project located at Village- [email protected]. Sarah Bhiyani, Tehsil- Kolyat, District-Bikaner, Raj. Consultant Name- ABC Techno Labs India Pvt. Ltd. Add- 169, Prithviraj Nagar, Maharani Farm Near Vidyasthali School, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Email- [email protected]

4. 15113 Environmental Clearance for Proponent Name:-M/s Godha & mining project " Amalda company, Shri Satyaprakash Deedwaniya China Clay Mine" Project m.l. S/o Shri Ratan lal Deedwaniya, Add.:- D- no.46/80 Area- 32.3743Hect. 4, Nagori Garden, Bhilwara village -Amalda, Tehsil- Email:- [email protected] Jahazpur, District- Bhilwara, Consultants Name-team institute Of Rajasthan. Proposed capacity - Science& Technology Pvt. Ltd. Add:- E- 2,11,900TPA 65, Chitranjan Marg, C-scheme, jaipur- 302001

5. 2533 Environmental Clearance for Proponent Name:- Madhup Joshi R/o – Environmental Clearance B242, Circular Road, Nehru Nagar, Jaipur under “B2” category for E mail- [email protected] mining lease No. 6/98 for Name of the Consultant:-Geomin mineral Iron Ore at Village- Solution Pvt. Ltd. Opp- Pugal House, Old Bagawas, Tehsil- Virat Nagar, Ginani, Bikaner (raj) District-Jaipur, Rajasthan E mail- [email protected]

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

6. 15606 EC our proposed project- Proponent Name:- Mahatma Resorts Pvt. "Mahatma Resorts" promoted Ltd.Vishal Kapoor,village-Paloda, Thsil- by "Mahatma Resorts Pvt. Garhi, Banswara, Rajasthan,EMail- Ltd." Coming up at khasra No. [email protected]; 4203 to [email protected] 4208,5126,5519/4191,5520/41 Name of the consultant: - Enkay Enviro 87,5521/5127,Village-Sisarma, Services Pvt. Ltd., Add-92 Heera Nagar - Tehsil-Girwa, Udaipur, A, Near Shalimar Bagh, Ajmer Road, Rajasthan with Total plot Distt.- Jaipur (Raj.) Eamil:- area:62,423.78 Sq.m. and Built [email protected] up area:-37,444,57 Sq.m. ,(Proposal No-89737)

7. 15555 Environmental Clearance for Proponent Name:- Sh. Rishabh Kumar Proposed Affordable Housing Bhanawat,Project InCharge,M/s Archi Project " Archi Galaxy, at Arihant Ground floor, ArchiArihant village Zinc Smelter Debari, Apartment, 100ft road, Shobhagpura, Tehsil Girwa, Udaipur, Udaipur, Rajasthan Email:- Rajasthan. [email protected] [email protected] Name of Consultant :- Gaurang Environment Solutions Pvt.Ltd. Add:- 501, Paris Point , Collectorate Circle, Bani Park, Jaipur(Raj.) Email;- [email protected]

8. 15207 Environmental Clearance for Project proponent :- M/s Modi Levigated our Mining project "China Kaolin pvt. Ltd. Authorized Singnatory: Clay" Quartz, Feldspar and shri Antarksh Modi Silica sand stone Mine ( Add:- Opposite Railway Station, Neem ka ML.NO. 1/96 )" ML.Area:- Thana , Sikar , E-mail:- 20.0ha annual production - [email protected] , [email protected] 70,500 TPA Expanson capcity Name of Consultant: -Team Institute Of - 207430 TPA Near village - Science &Technology Pvt. Ltd., Add:- E- Nimli, Tehsil- Viratnagar, 65 , Chitranjan Marg, C-scheme, Jaipur Distt- Jaipur , Rajasthan . Raj. Promoted by M/s Modi Levigated Kaolin pvt. Ltd.

9. 15330 E.C. for Karoti Dhaniya Iron Project proponent :- Smt. Shikha Modi ore mine with crusher ML No. (Project In Charge) W/O Shri Chhagan 3/99, Area – 5.00, ha. Khasra Modi, R/O. Village :- Chhawani, Tehsil – no. – 1126, Capacity:- 11232 Neem ka Thana , District:- Sikar (Raj.) TPA at village – Karoti Email:- Dhaniya, Tehsil – Udaipurwati, [email protected] District – Jhunjhunu, State - Name of Consultant: - M/S- Ramji Mine Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

(Raj.) Envirotech , plot no-21, first Floor , Aarna- 2 Tower, Kartarpura Industrial Area, Jaipur, Rajasthan- 302006 E-mail: [email protected] 10 15597 Project Name:-EC of Project Proponent Name-The Secretary, Neemach Mata Ropeway at Urban Improvement Trust (UIT), Add- Udaipur Rajasthan promoted Saheli Marg, Udaipur, Rajasthan. by Damodar Ropeways & Infra Designation- Mr.DK Bansal, Email- Ltd. Area-05535hec, Khasra [email protected] no-1628 for upper Terminal Consultant Name-Min Mec Consultancy and partial corridor and khasra Pvt. Ltd. Add-A-121,Paryavaran Complex, no-2433 for Lower Terminal IGNOU Road,new Delhi, Email.- and partial corridor. (Proposal [email protected]; Website- No-78147) www.minmec.co.in

11. 4232 P.N. Jethwani 252, Adarsh Project Name:-Regarding submission of Colony, Tehsil Nimbahera, Form 1 and PFR with Proposed TOR for District Email: proposed manufacturing unit of Chemical [email protected] Fertiliser unit for manufacturing of single super phosphate (350 TPD) and Granular single super phosphate (350 TPD) at plot no 897/129/2, village doriya, Tehsil Nimbahera, District- Chittorhgarhm Rajasthan Production Capacity SSP TPA. Consultant Name – EQMS India Pvt. Ltd., Delhi; E- mail: [email protected]

12. 15692 Project Name :- EC for the Proponent Name:- M/S. Aasan Realty proposed Residential & Pvt. Ltd., Add-412 A, 4th Floor, Chiranjiv Commercial Township at Tower, 43 Nehru Place, new Delhi,Email- Khasra Nos: 114/2, 114/5, 115, [email protected] 129,122/1, 124/1, Name of the consultant: - J.M. EnviroNet 124,125,126,126/1,127/1,127/2 Pvt.Ltd. Add:- 202-A, ABW Tower, MG ,127/3,127/4, in pal village & Road, IFFCO Chowk, Sector25, Gurugram Khasra no. 210, 211 & 212 in Email:- [email protected] Gangana Village, Tehsil & Dist-Jodhpur,(Rajasthan) of M/S.Aasan Realty Pvt. Ltd. - Submission of Environmental Clearance Application Reg. (Proposal No-93116).

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

Additional Agenda no. 01.Fileno.F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project/Cat.8(a)(15568)/ 2018-19

Project Name:- EC for proposed "Navkar Residency & Navkar Homes " affordable group housing project at village Sonkhar, kherli , Tehsil Kathumar, District Alwar, Rajasthan.

Proponent Name:-Navkar Prime Developers Private Limited, Pavan Kumar Jain (Managing Director) Add:- 1/511-512, kala kua, Housing Board, Arawali Vihar, Alwar , Rajasthan. Email: - [email protected]

Name of the consultant: - Superintendence Company of India (P) Limited Add:- Plot no. Y-23, Block EP, Sector V, Salt Lake, Kolkata

Information as per Form-1 and other documents submitted by Project Proponent.

1 Category /Item no. 8 (a) of Schedule to the EIA Notification, 2006. (in schedule) 2 Location of Project Khasra no 736, 738, 740, 743, 744, 745, 746, 747, 750, 751, 752, 753, 754, 755 & 757, Village Sonkhar, Kherli, Tehsil Kathumar, District Alwar, Rajasthan 3 Land Use Particulars EWS & LIG Plotted Total in (Part I) Sq.m. Development Sq.m. (Part 2) Sq.m Total Plot Area 42,895.94 42,848.15 85,744.09 Gross Built-up area 27,031.67 -- 27,031.67 Landscape area 2,164.21 (5.04%) 2,160.51 (5.04%) 4,324.72 (5.04%) Commercial 2,113.98 (4.93%) 1568.27 (3.66%) 3682.25 (4.29%) Road Area 16,235.84 (37.85%) 12,179.71 28,415.55 (28.43%) (33.15%) Open Area 3,772.08 (8.79%) 4,667.49 10.89%) 8,439.57 9.85%) (Facility Area) EWS & LIG / 18,609.83 (43.38%) 22,272.17 40,882.00 Plot Development (51.98%) (47.67%) (Page no 11 ) 4 Details of No construction has been undertaken at the site. construction taken (Page no 73) place at site(if any)

5 Parking Total Parking required = 180 Provision for Parking of 180 E.C.U. has been made as follows: Vehicle Open Ground Total Cars 0 0 0

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

Scooters 2 Scooter for each LIG 454 454 (152 ECU) Units -227 1 Scooter for each 85 85 (28 ECU) EWS Units-85 Grand Total (ECU) 539 (180 ECU) (Page no 48 ) 6 Project Cost Rs. 26.11 Crores (Cover Page) 7 Water Requirement The daily water requirement for the project will be 370 KLD (300 KLD Fresh & Source + 70 KLD recycled) Particular Demand Quantity Domestic Fresh water demand 300 KLD Recycled water 70 KLD Source of water:-. Ground Water supply Area Waste water generated Disposal Domestic After treatment – 70 KLD reuse in 250 KLD Landscaping, General Washing & Filter back wash (Page no 31 ) 8 Fuel & Energy Electricity: Connected Load: 1634.81 KW; Demand Load : 817.41 KW (Page no 16 ) 9 Application No. & Proposal No : SIA/RJ/NCP/84404/2018 Date & documents Online Submission: 02.11.2018 submitted Hard Copy Submission: 10 Environmental Management Plan S. No. Particular Capital Cost Recurring Cost (in Rs) (Annual) (in Rs) along with 1 Sewage Treatment Plant (300 47 Lac 5.5 Lac Budgetary breakup KLD) 2 Rain water Storage Structure 10 Lac 2.0 Lac 3 Solid Waste Management 2.5 Lac 0.50 Lac 4 Environmental Monitoring -- 1 Lac 5 Landscaping 7.01 Lac 1.51 Lac TOTAL 66.5 Lac 10.50 Lac

11 CSR Activates along Capital Cost (Rs in lacs) – 19.05 S. Lac with budgetary No Activities (2.0% of Project cost 26.11 Cr) breakup . 1st IInd IIIrd TOTAL Year Year Year 1. Construction of play ground, volleyball 6.05 4.0 4.0 14.05 court, handball court, football court alongwith sports accessories in Government Ucch Madhyamik Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

Vidyalaya Kherli, Rajkiya Adarsh Ucch Madhymik Vidyalaya Sonkhar, Rajkiya Adarsh Ucch Madhymik Vidyalaya Kerli Rel, Kathoomar, Alwar & Government Balika Ucch Madhyamik Vidyalaya Kherli. 2. a) Construction of toilet for girls at 4.0 3.5 2.45 9.95 Rajkiya Adarsh Ucch Madhymik Vidyalaya Sonkhar & Kerli Rel, Kathoomar, Alwar. b) Repair of existing room flooring & Ceiling in Government Ucch Madhyamik Vidyalaya Kherli, Rajkiya Adarsh Ucch Madhymik Vidyalaya Sonkhar, Rajkiya Adarsh Ucch Madhymik Vidyalaya Kerli Rel, Kathoomar, Alwar & Government Balika Ucch Madhyamik Vidyalaya Kherli. 3. a) Provision of water coolers, water 2.00 1.50 1.00 4.50 purifier with 5 year AMC in Government Ucch Madhyamik Vidyalaya Kherli, Rajkiya Adarsh Ucch Madhymik Vidyalaya Sonkhar, Rajkiya Adarsh Ucch Madhymik Vidyalaya Kerli Rel, Kathoomar, Alwar & Government Balika Ucch Madhyamik Vidyalaya Kherli. b) Construction of boring with electricity connection in Rajkiya Adarsh Ucch Madhymik Vidyalaya Sonkhar, Rajkiya Adarsh Ucch Madhymik Vidyalaya Kerli Rel, Kathoomar, Alwar 4. a) Provision of Computer (10 nos) and 5.50 5.0 5.0 15.50 inverter in Government Balika Ucch Madhyamik Vidyalaya Kherli. b) Provision of inverter in Rajkiya Adarsh Ucch Madhymik Vidyalaya Sonkhar, Rajkiya Adarsh Ucch Madhymik Vidyalaya Kerli Rel, Kathoomar, Alwar. 5. Provision of solar lights in Government 2.5 2.22 1.0 5.72 Ucch Madhyamik Vidyalaya Kherli, Rajkiya Adarsh Ucch Madhymik Vidyalaya Sonkhar, Rajkiya Adarsh Ucch Madhymik Vidyalaya Kerli Rel, Kathoomar, Alwar & Government Balika Ucch Madhyamik Vidyalaya Kherli 6. Avenue plantation 1.00 0.75 0.75 2.50 Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

Total 21.05 16.97 14.20 52.22 Total-Rs. 52.22 Lacs has been proposed to spent for CER Activity

12 STP STP based on MBBR technology with capacity of 300 KLD will be installed. 13 Green Belt/ Area to be planted during operational phase : 4,324.72 (5.04%) Plantation area and No of trees to be planted : 152 trees % of total area in sq. mts. 14 Budgetary Breakup S. No. Particulars Budget (in Lac) for Labour 1. Housing facility for construction workers will be 3.00 provided 2. Separate toilet facility for male and female workers 1.00 along with waste water treatment facility i.e. septic tank and soak pit. 3. Clean drinking water will be sufficiently made 1.75 available at suitable points. 4. Provision of a suitable space for the use of children 0.75 (Crèche) if employment of female building workers exceeds more than 30. 5. First Aid Facilities 0.50 6. Personal Protective equipments like helmets face 1.50 masks, gloves, ear muffs and goggles will be provided to the workers. 7. Regular Health check up test and analysis will be 0.50 done. TOTAL 9.00

15 Present Status New Project. No construction done. Background of the Project—

1. The project was considered for presentation in 4.5th meeting of SEAC dated 26th, 27th and 28th December, 2018. 2. Keeping in view the presentation made by the PP and its Consultants and discussion held during the meeting, the SEAC asked the PP to submit the following information: a. 5 bore wells locations on map and details of underground water storage tank to be submitted. b. Location of Compost pit to be submitted and details of collection of garbage from door to door be submitted. c. Road side plantation be provided and shown on map. Plantation plan to be revised accordingly. d. Measures to be taken to bring down the Coliform in the treated domestic to the level so that it can be reused for plantations suitably.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

e. The total quantity of water for which the PP has sought NOC from CGWA should include/cater the quantity of water required for future buildings. f. The CER proposals should be revised as per need base. g. The EMP to be revised. 3. Accordingly a letter no.8751 dated 6.3.19 was issued to the PP. 4. The PP has replied vide letter dated 04.04.19. Observations of the committee:- The PP has applied for EC for proposed affordable group housing project having total plot area 85,744.09 sq. meter and gross built up area 27,031.67 sq. meter at Village Sonkhar, Kherli, Tehsil Kathumar, District Alwar, Rajasthan. The project is covered under category 8(a) of EIA notification dated 14.09.2006. The project does not have any areas protected under international convention, area which are important or sensitive for ecological reasons, areas used by protected, important or sensitive species of flora/ fauna and there is also no state/ national boundary, within 15 Km of the project site. The project does not involve approval/ clearance under the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and Wild Life Protection Act, 1972 as no forest land is involved and neither there is any Wild Life Sancturay/ National Park within 10 Km from the project site. In response to the query made by SEAC on 06.03.2019, the PP has submitted plan showing location proposed bore well, underground water tank along with connecting water collection line; plan showing location of seprate covered facility for storage of solid waste and location of compost pit for landscape waste; plan of plantation etc. The PP has also submitted revised details of CER as per OM dated 01.05.2018 of the MOEF & CC as also of the Environment Management Plan. Resolution:

Keeping in view the information contained in the documents submitted, the presentation made by the P.P. before the SEAC, Rajasthan in its 4.5th meeting held on 26-28th Dec.2018, after detailed deliberations and clarifications, the members were satisfied with the proposal, documents and reply of the queries and resolved to recommend to SEIAA for the grant of E.C for Project "Navkar Residency & Navkar Homes" affordable group housing project Khasra no 736, 738, 740, 743, 744, 745, 746, 747, 750, 751, 752, 753, 754, 755 & 757 at village Sonkhar, kherli, Tehsil Kathumar, District Alwar, Rajasthan, Proponent Name:- Navkar Prime Developers Private Limited, Pavan Kumar jain (Managing Director) Add:- 1/511-512, kala kua, Housing Board, Arawali Vihar, Alwar , Rajasthan. Email:- [email protected],Name of the consultant: - Superintendence Company of India (P) Limited Add:- Plot no. Y-23, Block EP, Sector V, Salt Lake, Kolkata subject to the following conditions:

CONSTRUCTION PHASE

1. Consent to Establish” shall be obtained from RPCB before start of any construction work related to proposed project at the site. 2. The PP shall obtain a “No objection certificate” for height clearance for the envisaged level from the Airports Authority of India. 3. No Mobile tower shall be installed. 4. Solar panels for common services areas shall be provided. 5. Provision for compost pit for dry leaves shall be provided. Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

6. Provision for drinking water supply for the residents from a legal source shall be made. 7. As envisaged, the P.P. shall invest the an amount of Rs. 66.50 lacs as capital cost and Rs. 10.50 lacs as annual recurring cost for implementing various environmental protection measure. 8. An amount of Rs. 52.22 lacs is required to be spent over a period of 3 years on CER activities (Rs. 21.05 lacs in Ist Year, Rs. 16.97 lacs in IInd year & Rs. 14.20 lacs in IIIrd Year). The expenditure on these activities shall be reflected in the books of account when presented for auditing of accounts. The proposal should contain provision for toilets for girls in nearby schools. The proposal should contain provision for monthly medical camps, distribution of medicines and improvement in educational facilities in the nearby schools. The detailed action plan of CSR activities shall be submitted by the PP to RSPCB at the time of applying for Consent to Establish/Consent to Operate. During construction phase and post construction / operation phase, the project proponent shall be responsible for implementation of EIA/EMP. Commitment of proponent in this regard shall be submitted to RPCB at the time of applying for CTE/CTO.

9. Green belt/Landscaping should be developed in 4324.72 m2. of total plot Area, as proposed.

10. This E.C. is issued from the environmental angle only, and does not absolve the project proponent from the other statutory obligations prescribed under any other law or any other instrument in force. The sole and complete responsibility to comply with the conditions laid down in all other laws for the time-being in force, rests with the industry / unit / project proponent. Any appeal against this environmental clearance lies with the National Green Tribunal, if preferred, within a period of 30 days as prescribed under section 16 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010. 11. For conservation of electricity and to reduce energy losses the management shall ensure that the electrical voltage is stepped down from 33 KV to 11 KV and distributed at this level and finally brought to 440 volts or as per prescribed norms.

12. The PP shall obtain approval of drawings of laying electrical lines from the concerned SE of RRVPNL/ JVVNL and comply with the provisions as per Terms and Conditions for Supply of Electricity-2004 of JVVNL.

13. The PP shall fulfill the requirements of energy regulatory commission.

14. All energy saving measures proposed by the PP should be implemented before the project is put into use.

15. A preventive action plan ( as part of conceptual plan) for earthquake resistance buildings as per NBC code specifically for zone 3,4, 5 should be submitted along with the Form 1 , Form 1A and conceptual plan to RSPCB at the time of applying for CTE /CTO.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

16. Road width and bend should be adequate for easy movement of fire fighting vehicles.

17. Proposals for provisions regarding accessibility to the various floors of the project and other related parts for Divyang people should be provided. 18. Details of all the points mentioned at point no. 9 under energy conservation of Form. IA would be explicitly taken care of.

19. The P.P. shall take necessary steps to improve the living conditions of the labour at site. An amount of Rs.9.0 Lacs shall be spent as Budgetary provision for the housing of construction labour within the site with all necessary infrastructure and facilities such as health, sanitation, fuel/LPG for cooking, safe drinking water, medical camps, toilets for women and crèche for infants etc. Such housing may be in the form of temporary structures to be removed after the completion of the project. Details of provisions should be submitted to RPCB at the time of obtaining CTE.

20. The PP will comply with the provisions as per the Building and Other Construction Workers (Regulation of Employment & Condition of Service) Act 1996. 21. The STP should be so designed so that it can cater the minimal flow due to lesser occupancy in the project so as to bring the waste water quality as per the prescribed standards. 22. The drains should be of adequate capacity and be lined till the final disposal points.

23. The entire waste water should be treated through a STP of capacity 300 KLD of MBBR technology. The construction of the STP should be carried out simultaneously with that of the project and the STP should be functional before the project is put into use. The STP should have a separate hourly meter and energy meter.

24. The PP shall comply with Construction & Demolition Waste Management Rules, 2016 as applicable.

25. All required sanitary and hygienic measures shall be put in place before starting construction activities. The safe disposal of waste water and solid waste generated during the Construction phase shall be ensured.

26. All the labourers engaged for construction shall be screened for health and adequately treated before engaging them to work at the site.

27. All the topsoil excavated during the construction shall be stored for use in horticulture/landscape development within the project site.

28. Disposal of muck during construction phase should only be at approved sites with the approval of competent authority. It should not create any adverse effect on the neighbouring communities and be disposed by taking necessary precautions for general safety and health aspects of the people. Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

29. Soil and ground water samples will be tested to ascertain that there is no threat to the ground water quality by leaching of heavy metals and other toxic contaminants.

30. Construction spoils, including bituminous material and other hazardous materials must not be allowed to contaminate water courses and the dump sites for such material must be secured so that they do not leach into the ground water.

31. The diesel generator sets to be used during and post construction phase shall be of low- sulphur-diesel type and shall conform to Environment (Protection) Rules for air and noise emission standards.

32. Vehicles hired for bringing construction material and labourers to the site shall be in good conditions and shall conform to applicable air and noise emission standards and shall be operated during non-peak/approved hours.

33. Ambient noise levels shall conform to residential standards both during day and night. Incremental pollution loads on the ambient air and noise quality shall be closely monitored during construction phase.

34. Fly ash shall be used as building material in the construction as per the provisions of Fly Ash notification of September, 1999 and as amended till date.

35. NOC shall be obtained from National State Disaster Management Authority wherever applicable. 36. Provision for proposed storm water harvesting and its re-use as per CGWA and BIS standards for various applications should be implemented before the project is put into use.

37. Guidelines issued by concerned Ministry for water scarce areas be followed.

38. Water demand during construction shall be reduced by the use of pre-mixed concrete, curing agents and other best practices. Effort should be made to use treated waste water from nearby areas In place of fresh water.

39. Building Plan should be got approved from the competent Authority and the construction should be as per the approved building plan and as per applicable provisions in NBC.

40. The P.P. should ensure compliance of the order of the Hon’ble Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur in D. B. Civil writ petition no. 1536 of 2003 in the matter of Abdul Rahman vs. State of Rajasthan and others. The PP shall not allow making of any obstacle in the way of any natural water course/natural nallaha/stream carrying rain water to any water body. Adequate measures shall be taken to reduce air and noise pollution during construction as per CPCB norms.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

41. Fixtures for showers, toilet flushing and drinking shall be of low flow either by use of aerators of pressure reducing devices or sensor based control.

42. Use of glass may be reduced by up to 40% to reduce the electricity consumption and load in air-conditioning. If necessary, use high quality double glass with special reflective coating windows.

43. Roofing should meet prescriptive requirement as per Energy Conservation Building Code by using appropriate thermal insulation material to fulfil requirement.

44. Opaque walls shall meet prescriptive requirement as per Energy Conservation Building Code for all air-conditioned spaces, whereas, for non- air-conditioned spaces, by use of appropriate thermal insulation material to fulfil the requirement.

45. Provision of solar water heating /chilling/street lighting etc shall be explored and implemented.

46. A first-aid room should be provided at the project site, both, during construction and operation phase of the project.

47. Any hazardous waste generated during construction phase shall be disposed of as per applicable rules and norms with necessary authorization of the RPCB.

48. The approval of the competent authority shall be obtained for structural safety of the building due to earthquake, adequacy of fire fighting equipment, etc. as per National Building Code 2005 including protection measures from lightening etc.

49. Regular supervision of the above and other measures for monitoring shall be in place throughout the construction phase, so as to avoid nuisance to the surroundings.

50. The project proponent shall fulfil in letter and spirit, all the commitments made /submitted to the SEAC office.

51. The Company shall provide stacks of adequate height to the along with acoustic enclosures for noise control as per CPCB guidelines.

52. The PP shall obtain all requisite permissions/ approvals/clearances from concerning departments and district administration relating to project.

53. The PP shall procure required fresh water only from the authorized and legal source after approval from the competent Authority and such procurement of water shall be informed to RSPCB at time of applying for CTO/CTE.

54. The PP shall provide water flow meter at all suitable points to measure quantity of daily water consumption. Besides PP shall also provide water flow meters at waste water Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

generation points, treated waste water, waste water recycled and utilized for plantation / gardening purposes. The daily record of this should be maintained properly in a logbook.

55. The PP shall dispose of the sludge of STP in Scientific manner.

56. The PP shall make compliance of the standards, for Noise and National Ambient Air Quality, as prescribed under the Environment (Protection) Act 1986.

57. The total waste water generation will be utilized and disposed as proposed.

58. The PP shall not discharge treated waste water in to any natural water flow or in to any water body but make efforts to utilize maximum of the treated effluent within the premises of the project.

59. The PP shall ensure that solid waste generated should be properly collected & segregated. Wet garbage should be composed and dry/inert solid waste should be disposed off at approved sites for land filling after recovering recyclable material.

60. The CFs/FLs / E-waste should be properly collected and disposed off/ sent for recycle as per the prevailing rules / guidelines issued by the regulatory authority. Use of solar panel also may be done to the possible extent.

61. The adequate measure should be taken to prevent odour problem form STP.

62. The PP should obtain prior Consent to Operate before commissioning of the project or handed over to the occupier.

63. The PP shall provide and maintain the O&G trap in good condition so that the O&G coming with waste water from Kitchen/laundry should retain in trap.

OPERATION PHASE

1. Total domestic water requirement during operational phase shall be 370 KLD (300 KLD Fresh + 70 KLD recycled), as proposed. The necessary permission of water supply should be submitted to RSPCB at the time of applying for CTE/CTO. At the time of applying for CTE the PP should get it confirmed from RSPCB that no illegal bore well exists in the proposed site.

2. An independent expert shall certify the installation of the Sewage Treatment Plants (STP) and a report in this regard shall be submitted to the RPCB, before the project is commissioned for operation. Discharge of treated sewage shall conform to the norms & standards prescribed under the Environment (Protection) Act 1986 or the standards laid down by the Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board.

3. Adequate measures shall be taken to prevent odour from solid waste processing and STP. Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

4. Proper system of channelizing excess storm water shall be provided.

5. Rain Water harvesting (RWH) for roof top run-off and surface run-off, as planned shall be implemented. Before recharging the surface run off, pre-treatment must be done to remove suspended matter, oil and grease. The Rain Water Harvesting plan shall be as per GoI manual.

6. The proposals on the energy conservation measures conforming to energy conservation norms finalized by Bureau of Energy Efficiency shall be implemented.

7. The power factor shall be maintained near unity.

8. Application of solar energy shall be incorporated for illumination of common areas, lighting for gardens and street lighting in addition to provision for solar water heating. A hybrid system or fully solar system for a portion of the apartments shall be provided.

9. The parking place shall have separate entry and exit points. Traffic congestion near the entry and exit points from the roads adjoining the proposed project site must be avoided. Parking shall be fully internalized and no public space shall be utilized.

10. Regular and periodic mock drills shall be undertaken by the fire department at least once in a year.

11. The D. G. sets to be operated with stack height as per EP Act, 1986 along with acoustic enclosure.

12. Incremental pollution loads on the ambient air quality noise and water quality shall be periodically monitored after commissioning of the project and report to be submitted to RPCB.

13. The solid waste generated shall be properly collected & segregated before disposal to the City Municipal Facility. The in-vessel bio-conversion technique may be used for composting the organic waste.

14. Any hazardous waste including biomedical waste shall be disposed of as per applicable Rules & norms with necessary approvals of the Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board.

15. The green belt design along the periphery of the plot shall achieve attenuation factor conforming to the day and night noise standards prescribed for residential land use. The proposed open space inside the plot shall be suitably landscaped and covered with vegetation of indigenous species.

16. Local species of trees and shrubs of shall be planted to allow habitat for birds with adequate distance from the boundary.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

17. The SEIAA, Rajasthan reserve the right to add new conditions, modify/ annual any condition and/or to revoke the clearance if implementation of any of the aforesaid condition/other stipulations imposed by competent authorities is not satisfactory. Six monthly compliance status report of the project along with implementation of environmental measures shall be submitted to MoEF, Regional Office, Lucknow, SEIAA, Rajasthan & RPCB, Jaipur.

18. The PP shall provide adequate and proper compost pit for utilization of all the leaf litter and ensure that such waste should not be burnt.

General Conditions

1. This E.C. is issued from the environmental angle only, and does not absolve the project proponent from the other statutory obligations prescribed under any other law or any other instrument in force. The sole and complete responsibility, to comply with the conditions laid down in all other laws for the time-being in force, rests with the industry / unit / project proponent. Any appeal against this environmental clearance shall lie with the National Green Tribunal, if preferred, within a period of 30 days as prescribed under section 16 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010. 2. No further expansion or modifications in the project shall be carried out without prior approval of the SEIAA/Ministry of Environment and Forests as the case may be. In case of deviations or alterations in the project proposal from those submitted to this Authority for clearance, a fresh reference shall be made to the Authority to assess the adequacy of conditions imposed and to add additional environmental protection measures required, if any. 3. The implementation of the project vis-à-vis environmental action plans shall be monitored by MoEF Regional Office at Lucknow / RSPCB / CPCB / SEIAA, Department of Environment, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur and this office. A six monthly compliance status report shall be submitted to monitoring agencies. 4. The EC is liable to be rejected, in case it is found that the PP has deliberately concealed and furnished false and misleading information or data which is material to screening or scoping or appraisal or decision on the application for EC. ` 5. The project authorities shall inform the MoEF Regional Office at Lucknow / RSPCB / CPCB / SEIAA, Department of Environment, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur and the date of financial closure and final approval of the project by the concerned authorities and the date of start of the project. 6. Officials from the Department of Environment, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur/ Regional Office of MoEF, Lucknow, RSPCB who would be monitoring the implementation of Environmental safeguards should be given full cooperation, facilities and documents/data by the project proponents during their inspection. A complete set of all the documents submitted to SEIAA should be forwarded to the CCF, Regional Office of MoEF, Lucknow / SEIAA, Department of Environment, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur / RSPCB. 7. The Authority reserves the right to add additional safeguard measures subsequently, if found necessary, and to take action including revoking of the environment clearance under the provision of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, to ensure effective Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

implementation of the suggested safeguard measures in a time bound and satisfactory manner. 8. The project proponent should advertise in at least two local Newspapers widely circulated in the region, one of which shall be in the vernacular language informing that the project has been accorded environmental Clearance and copies of clearance letters are available with the Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board and may also be seen on the website of the RSPCB. The advertisement should be made within 7 days from the day of issue of the clearance letter and a copy of the same should be forwarded to the Regional Office of MoEF at Lucknow/Department of Ecology and Environment, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 9. The conditions of EC shall be enforced among others under the provisions of water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981, the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, the Public Liability (Insurance) Act, 1991 and EIA Notification, 2006, along with their amendments and rules. 10. The PP shall obtain prior clearance form forestry and wild Life angle including clearance from standing committee of National Board of Wild Life(as applicable). It is further categorically stated that grant of EC does not necessary implies that Forestry and Wild Life clearance shall be granted to the project and that proposals for forestry and wild Life clearance will be considered by the respective authorities on their merits and decision taken. The investment made in the project, if any based on EC so granted, in anticipation of clearance form Forestry and Wild Life angle shall be entirely at the cost risk of the PP and MOEF/SEIAA shall not be responsible in this regard in any manner. 11. The SEIAA, Rajasthan may revoke or suspend the clearance, if implementation of any of the above conditions is not satisfactory. 12. Main haulage road should be provided with permanent water sprinklers and other roads should be regularly wetted with water tankers fitted with sprinklers. The material transfer points should invariably be provided with Bag filters and or dry fogging system. In case of Belt- conveyors facilities the system should be fully covered to avoid air borne dust; Use of effective sprinkler system to suppress fugitive dust on haul roads and other transport roads shall be ensured. 13. Periodic monitoring of ambient air quality shall be carried out for PM10, PM2.5, SPM, SO2 and NOx monitoring. Location of the stations (minimum 6) shall be decided based on the meteorological data, topographical features and environmentally and ecologically sensitive targets and frequency of monitoring shall be decided in consultation with the Rajasthan State pollution Control Board (RPCB). Six monthly reports of the data so collected shall be regularly submitted to the RPCB/CPCB including the MoEF, Regional office, Lucknow. 14. Personnel working in dusty areas shall wear protective respiratory devices they shall also be provided with adequate training and information on safety and health aspects. 15. The ambient noise level should confirm to the standards prescribed under E (P) A Rules, 1986 viz 75 dB (A) during day time and 70 dB (A) during night time. 16. The PP shall submit an environmental statement for the financial year ending 31st March in Form-V as prescribed under the environment (Protection) Rules, 1986, as amended subsequently on or before the 30th day of September every year, to the Rajasthan State

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

Pollution Control Board/SEIAA and shall also be put on the website of the company along with the status of compliance of environmental clearance conditions and shall also be sent to the Lucknow Regional offices of MoEF/SEIAA by e-mail as well as hard copy duly signed by competent person of company.

Additional Agenda no.02 File no.F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project/ Cat.8 (a)B1(15567)/2018-19

Project Name :- EC for proposed a Commercial cum Residential Complex "Manhattan" at Plot no. 1to8, at Mahal Road Scheme - Ramchandrapura Jagatpura, Jaipur Rajasthan. Proponent Name:-M/s Eternal Home Developers LLP Mr. Prashant Gupta (Partner) Add:- F32, Azad Marg, behind BJP Office C-Scheme, Jaipur. E-Mail:- [email protected] Name of the consultant: - Enviro Concept (I) Pvt Ltd. Add:- 1/3 A, Yudhister Marg, C-Scheme, jaipur E-mail:- [email protected]

Information as per Form-1 and other documents submitted by Project Proponent.

1. Category / Item no. Cat.8(a) (in Schedule): 2. Location of Project Plot-no-1 to 8, At Mahal Road, Scheme – Ram Chandrapura, Jagatpura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Latitude: 26° 47’ 1.10” N, Longitude: 75° 51’ 43.13” E 3. Project Details S.N. Particulars Details 1. Total plot area 25616.44 Sq.m. Plot Area to be developed-11515.97 Sq.m. (Remaining 14100.47plot area future planning ) 2. Gross Built up Area 35466.28 Sq.m 3. Built up area Residential- 16497.57 Sq.m Commercial-18968.71 Sq.m Total- 35466.28 Sq.m 4. Permissible F.A.R. Permissible BAR.-8x25616.44 = 204931.52 Sq.m 5. Utilized F.A.R. Achieved BAR.- 28368.51 sqm 6. Permissible Ground 3560.58 Sq.m. Coverage 7. Utilized Ground 3560.58 Sq.m. Coverage 8. Permissible height - 9. Achieved height 43.60 Mtr. 10. Proposed Green Area 3003.04 Sq.m & 694 Trees(11.72% of total plot area) 11. Total No. of Flat (1 1BHK-108nos BHK, 2 BHK etc.) 2BHK-72nos 12. Other facilities like Studio Apartments-156nos swimming pool, club Hotel Rooms-75nos etc. Shops-144nos Kiosks-66nos Stalls in foodcourt-6nos Conceptual Plan & Environmental Management Plan Page no. 43-44

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

4. Details of construction Nil As this is a new project. No Construction has been taken place at site taken place at site 5. Parking Total Parking required = 374.66 E.C.U. has been made as follows: Parking In Cars Scooters E.C.U. Basement 1 178 0 178 Stilt Floor 0 0 0 Open Ground 108 266 196.66 Total E.C.U. 286 CARS 266 SCOOTERS 374.66 Conceptual Plan & Environmental Management Plan Page no. 44 6. Project Cost: 113.14 Cr. C.A. Certificate enclosed as Annexure-III 7. Water Requirement per Total water requirement will be 140 KLD One Time day & Source Domestic(Fresh Water) -100 KLD Treated water will be used in following activities:- Flushing- 40KLD Landscape 30 KLD Car & Road washing – 38KLD The water demand will be met from PHED water Supply. Conceptual Plan & Environmental Management Plan Page no. 44 8. Fuel & Energy:- Source of Supply JVVNL Electrical Load 2738 KVA D.G Sets 5 Capacity 2 x 500 KVA, 2 x 200 KVA and 1X160 KVA Fuel Used LSD (sulphur content: 0.05%) Conceptual Plan & Environmental Management Plan Page no. 44 9. Application No. & Date 26/11/2018 & documents submitted :- 10 Environment As under: Management Plan with S.No. Description Capital Cost Recurring Cost budgetary provision. (Lakhs) (Lakhs) 1 STP 75 0.75 2 Landscaping 35 0.35 3 Ground water recharge structure 30 0.3 4 Dual plumbing system 90 0.9 5 Solar energy utilization application 35 0.35 6 Energy efficient lighting 56 0.56 7 Acoustic enclosure 60 0.6 8 Efficient fixtures 50 0.5 9 Monitoring of air, water, noise and soil 20 0.2 10 Insulation of walls 15 0.15 11 Others 100 1

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

Total 566 5.66 Conceptual Plan & Environmental Management Plan Page no. 68 11 CER Activities As Under:-

S. No PARTICULARS TOTAL AMOUNT (Lacs) Ist IInd IIIrd IVth Vth Total Year Year Year Year Year 1. As per the discussion with (Sarpanch), Gram Panchayat–Vidhani, Panchayat Samiti- Sanganer ,Jaipur(Raj.) following requirement will be full filled:- 4.00 0.75 0.50 0.50 0.50 6.25  In the Govt. Middle School at Village-Jirota Tehsil Sanganer, District- Jaipur boundary wall will be constructed & Water Cooler will be provided. (Approx area 2000 m.) 2.  In the Crimson Ground of Vidhani of 3000 Sq.m 6.50 1.25 1.00 1.00 0.50 10.25 boundary wall and tin shed will be constructed. Cemented Chair, Cemented water tank & Store Room will be constructed. 3.  In the Atal Seva Kendra Vidhani renovation will be 11.00 2.25 1.00 1.00 0.50 15.75 done by paint, floor work, plantation with tree guards. o Construction of separate toilet for ladies & gents. o 2 sets of Table and 25 Chair will be provided. o Water Cooler will be provided. o 2 Computers along with the printers will be provided. 4.  In the Govt. Primary School Shri Kishanpura, 6.50 1.21 0.75 0.75 0.75 9.96 Tehsil Sanganer, District- Jaipur boundary wall will be constructed. o Water Cooler will be provided. o Construct separate toilets for the girls & Boys of the school. o Floor work by the interlocking tiles. o 10 sets of computer will provide in the school along with the table and chairs. o Plantation work and paint work in the school. 5.  In the Govt. Middle School of Jaisinghpura, Tehsil- 3.00 0.75 0.50 0.50 0.50 5.25 Sanganer, District- Jaipur. o Main Gate will be provided in the school. o Plantation work and paint work in the school. o Water Cooler will be provided. o Construct separate toilets for the girls & Boys of the school. o In the Aanganbadi Kendra 5 sets of table and chair will be provided.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

6.  In the Crimson ground of Village- 7.00 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 9.50 Ramchandrapura boundary wall and tin shed will be constructed. Tin shed with sitting facility, Cemented water tank & Store Room will be constructed. 7.  In the Govt. Primary School Ramchandrapura, 8.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 11.00 Tehsil Sanganer, District- Jaipur. o Plaster, Paint & Floor work by the interlocking tiles o Developed the Playground in school. 8.  In the Govt. Primary School Saligrampura, Tehsil 12.00 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 14.50 Sanganer, District- Jaipur . o Floor work by the interlocking tiles. o RCC Work of rooms and plaster work of walls. o Solar lights will be provided. 9.  In the public place of Saligrampura, Tehsil 4.00 1.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 8.50 Sanganer, District- Jaipur Solar Lights will be provided. 10.  In the Govt. Secondary school Mohanpura Tehsil 15.00 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 17.50 Sanganer, District- Jaipur area of 4000 sq.m . o 3 rooms will be constructed o Boundary wall will be constructed o Paint work &Floor work by the interlocking tiles. 11.  In the Govt. Middle school Mathurawala Tehsil 6.50 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 11.50 Sanganer, District- Jaipur . o Paint work &Floor work by the interlocking tiles. o Water Cooler will be provided. o Plantation work in the school. 12.  In the Govt. Middle school Vimalpura, Tehsil 12.50 2.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 16.50 Sanganer, District- Jaipur o Paint work &Floor work by the interlocking tiles. o Water Cooler will be provided. o Plantation work in the school. o 50 sets of Table and Chairs will be provided in the schools. 13.  In the Govt. Middle school Sahya ki Dhani, Tehsil 14.00 2.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 17.50 Sanganer, District- Jaipur o Paint work &Floor work by the interlocking tiles. o Boundary wall will be constructed o Main Gate will be provided. o Plantation work in the school. o 20 sets of Table and Chairs will be provided in the schools. 14.  In Nine Gram Panchayats of Vidhani approx 100 10.00 2.00 1.25 1.25 1.25 15.75 solar lights will be provided. TOTAL 120.5 20.21 10.00 10.00 9.00 169.71 About 169.71 Lacs earmarked for implementation of above proposed activities under CER

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

12 STP STP Capacity: 150 KLD. Technology: SBR. Conceptual Plan & Environmental Management Plan Page no. 53-56 13 Green Belt/ Plantation 3003.04 Sq. m (11.72% of the total plot area) area and % of total area in Conceptual Plan & Environmental Management Plan Page no. 43 sq. mts. 14 Budgetary Breakup for Infrastructure Details of Facilities Budget in Rs. Labour (Lac per year) Drinking and Potable water and separate toilets 1.50 Sanitation facilities will be provided Safety Providing PPE’s i.e. Helmet, Mask 2.50 and gums boot etc Fuel Fuels for Cooking to labors 1.0 Health and Medical A first aid room with equipped 1.50 facility First-aid boxes and cupboards accessible during the hours of working. Group Insurance Providing insurance facility to all 3.5 workers Rest Shelter Rest shelter will be provided to 2.0 labor. Crèche and children Providing crèche with requisite 3.0 room amenities to children Total 15.00 Conceptual Plan & Environmental Management Plan Page no. 69 15 Present status This is vacant land. No construction has been taken place at site

Background of the Project—

1. The project was considered for presentation in 4.5th meeting of SEAC dated 26th, 27th and 28th December, 2018. 2. Keeping in view the presentation made by the PP and its Consultants and discussion held during the meeting, the SEAC resolved to seek following information from the PP giving 45 days of time for submission from the date of issue of query letter: a. There would be a problem with width of the ramp due to turning. This requires modification in drawings. b. Entry and exit from basement to the ground floor is not proper. Revise drawings to be submitted. c. Proposed landscape area can fall in the adjoining plot. Proposed area under greenery to be shown in map in own plot. d. No section plans have been submitted. e. The distance of the HT line should be ensured to be at a safe distance as per norms. (from refuge area). Details to be submitted. f. Revised reuse of treated waste water be submitted.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

g. Proposal and agreement for use of water for construction activity be obtained from the treated waste water from other multistoried building in the vicinity that have full- fledged STP. 3. Accordingly a letter no.8758 dated 6.3.19 was issued to the PP. 4. The PP has replied vide letter dated 28.03.19.

Observation of the committee:

The PP has applied for EC, for proposed commercial cum residential complex, having total plot area 25616.44 sq. meter and total built up area 35466.28 sq. meter at plot no. 1 to 8, Mahal Road Scheme, Ramchandrapura, Jagatpura Jaipur, Rajasthan. The project is covered under category 8(a) of EIA notification dated 14.09.2006. The project does not have any areas protected under international convention, area which are important or sensitive for ecological reasons, areas used by protected, important or sensitive species of flora/ fauna and there is also no state/ national boundary, within 15 Km of the project site. The project does not involve approval/ clearance under the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and Wild Life Protection Act, 1972 as no forest land is involved and neither there is any Wild Life Sancturay/ National Park within 10 Km from the project site. In response to the query made by SEAC on 06.03.2019, the PP has submitted resived basement floor plan, resived water balance details etc.

Resolution:

Keeping in view the information contained in the documents submitted, the presentation made by the P.P. before the SEAC, Rajasthan in its 4.5th meeting held on 26-27th Dec.2018, after detailed deliberations and clarifications, the members were satisfied with the proposal, documents and reply of the queries and resolved to recommend to SEIAA for the grant of E.C for Project Name:- Commercial cum Residential Complex "Manhattan" at Plot no. 1to8, at Mahal Road Scheme - Ramchandrapura Jagatpura, Jaipur Rajasthan. Proponent Name:- M/s Eternal Home Developers LLP Mr. Prashant Gupta (Partner) Add:- F32, Azad Marg, behind BJP Office C- Scheme, Jaipur. E-Mail:- [email protected] Name of the consultant: - Enviro Concept (I) Pvt Ltd. Add:- 1/3 A, Yudhister Marg, C-Scheme, jaipur E-mail:- [email protected] subject to the following conditions:

CONSTRUCTION PHASE

1. Consent to Establish” shall be obtained from RPCB before start of any construction work related to proposed project at the site. 2. The PP shall obtain a “No objection certificate” for height clearance for the envisaged level from the Airports Authority of India. 3. No Mobile tower shall be installed. 4. Solar panels for common services areas shall be provided. 5. Provision for compost pit for dry leaves shall be provided. 6. Provision for drinking water supply for the residents from a legal source shall be made. 7. As envisaged, the P.P. shall invest the an amount of Rs. 566 lacs as capital cost and Rs. 5.66 lacs as annual recurring cost for implementing various environmental protection measure.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

8. An amount of Rs. 169.71 lacs shall be spent over a period of 5 years on CER activities (Rs. 120.50 lacs in Ist Year, Rs. 20.21 lacs in IInd year, Rs. 10.00 lacs in IIIrd Year, Rs. 10.00 lacs in IVth Year & Rs. 9.00 lacs in Vth Year ). The expenditure on these activities shall be reflected in the books of account when presented for auditing of accounts. The proposal should contain provision for toilets for girls in nearby schools. The proposal should contain provision for monthly medical camps, distribution of medicines and improvement in educational facilities in the nearby schools. The detailed action plan of CSR activities shall be submitted by the PP to RSPCB at the time of applying for Consent to Establish/Consent to Operate. During construction phase and post construction / operation phase, the project proponent shall be responsible for implementation of EIA/EMP. Commitment of proponent in this regard shall be submitted to RPCB at the time of applying for CTE/CTO.

9. Green belt/Landscaping should be developed in 3003.04 m2 (694 Trees) of total plot Area, as proposed.

10. This E.C. is issued from the environmental angle only, and does not absolve the project proponent from the other statutory obligations prescribed under any other law or any other instrument in force. The sole and complete responsibility to comply with the conditions laid down in all other laws for the time-being in force, rests with the industry / unit / project proponent. Any appeal against this environmental clearance lies with the National Green Tribunal, if preferred, within a period of 30 days as prescribed under section 16 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010. 11. For conservation of electricity and to reduce energy losses the management shall ensure that the electrical voltage is stepped down from 33 KV to 11 KV and distributed at this level and finally brought to 440 volts or as per prescribed norms.

12. The PP shall obtain approval of drawings of laying electrical lines from the concerned SE of RRVPNL/ JVVNL and comply with the provisions as per Terms and Conditions for Supply of Electricity-2004 of JVVNL.

13. The PP shall fulfill the requirements of energy regulatory commission.

14. All energy saving measures proposed by the PP should be implemented before the project is put into use.

15. A preventive action plan ( as part of conceptual plan) for earthquake resistance buildings as per NBC code specifically for zone 3,4, 5 should be submitted along with the Form 1 , Form 1A and conceptual plan to RSPCB at the time of applying for CTE /CTO.

16. Road width and bend should be adequate for easy movement of fire fighting vehicles.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

17. Proposals for provisions regarding accessibility to the various floors of the project and other related parts for Divyang people should be provided. 18. Details of all the points mentioned at point no. 9 under energy conservation of Form. IA would be explicitly taken care of.

19. The P.P. shall take necessary steps to improve the living conditions of the labour at site. An amount of Rs. 15.00 Lacs shall be spent as Budgetary provision for the housing of construction labour within the site with all necessary infrastructure and facilities such as health, sanitation, fuel/LPG for cooking, safe drinking water, medical camps, toilets for women and crèche for infants etc. Such housing may be in the form of temporary structures to be removed after the completion of the project. Details of provisions should be submitted to RPCB at the time of obtaining CTE.

20. The PP will comply with the provisions as per the Building and Other Construction Workers (Regulation of Employment & Condition of Service) Act 1996. 21. The STP should be so designed so that it can cater the minimal flow due to lesser occupancy in the project so as to bring the waste water quality as per the prescribed standards. 22. The drains should be of adequate capacity and be lined till the final disposal points.

23. The entire waste water should be treated through a STP of capacity 150 KLD of SBR technology. The construction of the STP should be carried out simultaneously with that of the project and the STP should be functional before the project is put into use. The STP should have a separate hourly meter and energy meter.

24. The PP shall comply with Construction & Demolition Waste Management Rules, 2016 as applicable.

25. All required sanitary and hygienic measures shall be put in place before starting construction activities. The safe disposal of waste water and solid waste generated during the Construction phase shall be ensured.

26. All the labourers engaged for construction shall be screened for health and adequately treated before engaging them to work at the site.

27. All the topsoil excavated during the construction shall be stored for use in horticulture/landscape development within the project site.

28. Disposal of muck during construction phase should only be at approved sites with the approval of competent authority. It should not create any adverse effect on the neighbouring communities and be disposed by taking necessary precautions for general safety and health aspects of the people.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

29. Soil and ground water samples will be tested to ascertain that there is no threat to the ground water quality by leaching of heavy metals and other toxic contaminants.

30. Construction spoils, including bituminous material and other hazardous materials must not be allowed to contaminate water courses and the dump sites for such material must be secured so that they do not leach into the ground water.

31. The diesel generator sets to be used during and post construction phase shall be of low- sulphur-diesel type and shall conform to Environment (Protection) Rules for air and noise emission standards.

32. Vehicles hired for bringing construction material and labourers to the site shall be in good conditions and shall conform to applicable air and noise emission standards and shall be operated during non-peak/approved hours.

33. Ambient noise levels shall conform to residential standards both during day and night. Incremental pollution loads on the ambient air and noise quality shall be closely monitored during construction phase.

34. Fly ash shall be used as building material in the construction as per the provisions of Fly Ash notification of September, 1999 and as amended till date.

35. NOC shall be obtained from National State Disaster Management Authority wherever applicable. 36. Provision for proposed storm water harvesting and its re-use as per CGWA and BIS standards for various applications should be implemented before the project is put into use.

37. Guidelines issued by concerned Ministry for water scarce areas be followed.

38. Water demand during construction shall be reduced by the use of pre-mixed concrete, curing agents and other best practices. Effort should be made to use treated waste water from nearby areas In place of fresh water.

39. Total domestic water requirement during operational phase shall be 140 KLD (100 KLD Fresh + 40 KLD recycled), as proposed. The necessary permission of water supply should be submitted to RSPCB at the time of applying for CTE/CTO. At the time of applying for CTE the PP should get it confirmed from RSPCB that no illegal bore well exists in the proposed site.

40. Building Plan should be got approved from the competent Authority and the construction should be as per the approved building plan and as per applicable provisions in NBC.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

41. The P.P. should ensure compliance of the order of the Hon’ble Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur in D. B. Civil writ petition no. 1536 of 2003 in the matter of Abdul Rahman vs. State of Rajasthan and others. The PP shall not allow making of any obstacle in the way of any natural water course/natural nallaha/stream carrying rain water to any water body. Adequate measures shall be taken to reduce air and noise pollution during construction as per CPCB norms.

42. Fixtures for showers, toilet flushing and drinking shall be of low flow either by use of aerators of pressure reducing devices or sensor based control.

43. Use of glass may be reduced by up to 40% to reduce the electricity consumption and load in air-conditioning. If necessary, use high quality double glass with special reflective coating windows.

44. Roofing should meet prescriptive requirement as per Energy Conservation Building Code by using appropriate thermal insulation material to fulfil requirement.

45. Opaque walls shall meet prescriptive requirement as per Energy Conservation Building Code for all air-conditioned spaces, whereas, for non- air-conditioned spaces, by use of appropriate thermal insulation material to fulfil the requirement.

46. Provision of solar water heating /chilling/street lighting etc shall be explored and implemented.

47. A first-aid room should be provided at the project site, both, during construction and operation phase of the project.

48. Any hazardous waste generated during construction phase shall be disposed of as per applicable rules and norms with necessary authorization of the RPCB.

49. The approval of the competent authority shall be obtained for structural safety of the building due to earthquake, adequacy of fire fighting equipment, etc. as per National Building Code 2005 including protection measures from lightening etc.

50. Regular supervision of the above and other measures for monitoring shall be in place throughout the construction phase, so as to avoid nuisance to the surroundings.

51. The project proponent shall fulfil in letter and spirit, all the commitments made /submitted to the SEAC office.

52. The Company shall provide stacks of adequate height to the along with acoustic enclosures for noise control as per CPCB guidelines. The DG Sets (2 x 500 KVA, 2 x 200 KVA, 1 x 160 KVA) shall comply with the norms notified under Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

53. The PP shall obtain all requisite permissions/ approvals/clearances from concerning departments and district administration relating to project.

54. The PP shall procure required fresh water only from the authorized and legal source after approval from the competent Authority and such procurement of water shall be informed to RSPCB at time of applying for CTO/CTE.

55. The PP shall provide water flow meter at all suitable points to measure quantity of daily water consumption. Besides PP shall also provide water flow meters at waste water generation points, treated waste water, waste water recycled and utilized for plantation / gardening purposes. The daily record of this should be maintained properly in a logbook.

56. The PP shall dispose of the sludge of STP in Scientific manner.

57. The PP shall make compliance of the standards, for Noise and National Ambient Air Quality, as prescribed under the Environment (Protection) Act 1986.

58. The total waste water generation will be utilized and disposed as proposed.

59. The PP shall not discharge treated waste water in to any natural water flow or in to any water body but make efforts to utilize maximum of the treated effluent within the premises of the project.

60. The PP shall ensure that solid waste generated should be properly collected & segregated. Wet garbage should be composed and dry/inert solid waste should be disposed off at approved sites for land filling after recovering recyclable material.

61. The CFs/FLs / E-waste should be properly collected and disposed off/ sent for recycle as per the prevailing rules / guidelines issued by the regulatory authority. Use of solar panel also may be done to the possible extent.

62. The adequate measure should be taken to prevent odour problem form STP.

63. The PP should obtain prior Consent to Operate before commissioning of the project or handed over to the occupier.

64. The PP shall provide and maintain the O&G trap in good condition so that the O&G coming with waste water from Kitchen/laundry should retain in trap.

OPERATION PHASE

1. The landscape area proposed for this project shall not be eliminated, sold or alienated by the PP as the land comprising landscaping area is an integral part of this project or this landscape area shall not be used for showing this landscape area for any other project or for getting approval on remaining land of PP.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

2. An independent expert shall certify the installation of the Sewage Treatment Plants (STP) and a report in this regard shall be submitted to the RPCB, before the project is commissioned for operation. Discharge of treated sewage shall conform to the norms & standards prescribed under the Environment (Protection) Act 1986 or the standards laid down by the Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board. 3. Adequate measures shall be taken to prevent odour from solid waste processing and STP.

4. Proper system of channelizing excess storm water shall be provided.

5. Rain Water harvesting (RWH) for roof top run-off and surface run-off, as planned shall be implemented. Before recharging the surface run off, pre-treatment must be done to remove suspended matter, oil and grease. The Rain Water Harvesting plan shall be as per GoI manual.

6. The proposals on the energy conservation measures conforming to energy conservation norms finalized by Bureau of Energy Efficiency shall be implemented.

7. The power factor shall be maintained near unity.

8. Application of solar energy shall be incorporated for illumination of common areas, lighting for gardens and street lighting in addition to provision for solar water heating. A hybrid system or fully solar system for a portion of the apartments shall be provided.

9. The parking place shall have separate entry and exit points. Traffic congestion near the entry and exit points from the roads adjoining the proposed project site must be avoided. Parking shall be fully internalized and no public space shall be utilized.

10. Regular and periodic mock drills shall be undertaken by the fire department at least once in a year.

11. The D. G. sets to be operated with stack height as per EP Act, 1986 along with acoustic enclosure.

12. Incremental pollution loads on the ambient air quality noise and water quality shall be periodically monitored after commissioning of the project and report to be submitted to RPCB.

13. The solid waste generated shall be properly collected & segregated before disposal to the City Municipal Facility. The in-vessel bio-conversion technique may be used for composting the organic waste.

14. Any hazardous waste including biomedical waste shall be disposed of as per applicable Rules & norms with necessary approvals of the Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

15. The green belt design along the periphery of the plot shall achieve attenuation factor conforming to the day and night noise standards prescribed for residential land use. The proposed open space inside the plot shall be suitably landscaped and covered with vegetation of indigenous species.

16. Local species of trees and shrubs of shall be planted to allow habitat for birds with adequate distance from the boundary.

17. The SEIAA, Rajasthan reserve the right to add new conditions, modify/ annual any condition and/or to revoke the clearance if implementation of any of the aforesaid condition/other stipulations imposed by competent authorities is not satisfactory. Six monthly compliance status report of the project along with implementation of environmental measures shall be submitted to MoEF, Regional Office, Lucknow, SEIAA, Rajasthan & RPCB, Jaipur.

18. The PP shall provide adequate and proper compost pit for utilization of all the leaf litter and ensure that such waste should not be burnt.

General Conditions

1. This E.C. is issued from the environmental angle only, and does not absolve the project proponent from the other statutory obligations prescribed under any other law or any other instrument in force. The sole and complete responsibility, to comply with the conditions laid down in all other laws for the time-being in force, rests with the industry / unit / project proponent. Any appeal against this environmental clearance shall lie with the National Green Tribunal, if preferred, within a period of 30 days as prescribed under section 16 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010. 2. No further expansion or modifications in the project shall be carried out without prior approval of the SEIAA/Ministry of Environment and Forests as the case may be. In case of deviations or alterations in the project proposal from those submitted to this Authority for clearance, a fresh reference shall be made to the Authority to assess the adequacy of conditions imposed and to add additional environmental protection measures required, if any. 3. The implementation of the project vis-à-vis environmental action plans shall be monitored by MoEF Regional Office at Lucknow / RSPCB / CPCB / SEIAA, Department of Environment, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur and this office. A six monthly compliance status report shall be submitted to monitoring agencies. 4. The EC is liable to be rejected, in case it is found that the PP has deliberately concealed and furnished false and misleading information or data which is material to screening or scoping or appraisal or decision on the application for EC. ` 5. The project authorities shall inform the MoEF Regional Office at Lucknow / RSPCB / CPCB / SEIAA, Department of Environment, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur and the date of financial closure and final approval of the project by the concerned authorities and the date of start of the project.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

6. Officials from the Department of Environment, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur/ Regional Office of MoEF, Lucknow, RSPCB who would be monitoring the implementation of Environmental safeguards should be given full cooperation, facilities and documents/data by the project proponents during their inspection. A complete set of all the documents submitted to SEIAA should be forwarded to the CCF, Regional Office of MoEF, Lucknow / SEIAA, Department of Environment, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur / RSPCB. 7. The Authority reserves the right to add additional safeguard measures subsequently, if found necessary, and to take action including revoking of the environment clearance under the provision of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, to ensure effective implementation of the suggested safeguard measures in a time bound and satisfactory manner. 8. The project proponent should advertise in at least two local Newspapers widely circulated in the region, one of which shall be in the vernacular language informing that the project has been accorded environmental Clearance and copies of clearance letters are available with the Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board and may also be seen on the website of the RSPCB. The advertisement should be made within 7 days from the day of issue of the clearance letter and a copy of the same should be forwarded to the Regional Office of MoEF at Lucknow/Department of Ecology and Environment, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 9. The conditions of EC shall be enforced among others under the provisions of water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974, the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981, the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, the Public Liability (Insurance) Act, 1991 and EIA Notification, 2006, along with their amendments and rules. 10. The PP shall obtain prior clearance form forestry and wild Life angle including clearance from standing committee of National Board of Wild Life(as applicable). It is further categorically stated that grant of EC does not necessary implies that Forestry and Wild Life clearance shall be granted to the project and that proposals for forestry and wild Life clearance will be considered by the respective authorities on their merits and decision taken. The investment made in the project, if any based on EC so granted, in anticipation of clearance form Forestry and Wild Life angle shall be entirely at the cost risk of the PP and MOEF/SEIAA shall not be responsible in this regard in any manner. 11. The SEIAA, Rajasthan may revoke or suspend the clearance, if implementation of any of the above conditions is not satisfactory. 12. Main haulage road should be provided with permanent water sprinklers and other roads should be regularly wetted with water tankers fitted with sprinklers. The material transfer points should invariably be provided with Bag filters and or dry fogging system. In case of Belt- conveyors facilities the system should be fully covered to avoid air borne dust; Use of effective sprinkler system to suppress fugitive dust on haul roads and other transport roads shall be ensured. 13. Periodic monitoring of ambient air quality shall be carried out for PM10, PM2.5, SPM, SO2 and NOx monitoring. Location of the stations (minimum 6) shall be decided based on the meteorological data, topographical features and environmentally and ecologically sensitive targets and frequency of monitoring shall be decided in consultation with the Rajasthan State pollution Control Board (RPCB). Six monthly reports of the data so

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

collected shall be regularly submitted to the RPCB/CPCB including the MoEF, Regional office, Lucknow. 14. Personnel working in dusty areas shall wear protective respiratory devices they shall also be provided with adequate training and information on safety and health aspects. 15. The ambient noise level should confirm to the standards prescribed under E (P) A Rules, 1986 viz 75 dB (A) during day time and 70 dB (A) during night time. 16. The PP shall submit an environmental statement for the financial year ending 31st March in Form-V as prescribed under the environment (Protection) Rules, 1986, as amended subsequently on or before the 30th day of September every year, to the Rajasthan State Pollution Control Board/SEIAA and shall also be put on the website of the company along with the status of compliance of environmental clearance conditions and shall also be sent to the Lucknow Regional offices of MoEF/SEIAA by e-mail as well as hard copy duly signed by competent person of company.

Additional Agendano.03 Fileno.F1(4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project/Cat.1(a)B1(2720)/2018-19

Project Name :- Environmental Clearance for our project “Sarah Bhiyani (M.L. No. 46/2009), area- 4.7 hectare, Ball Clay Mining Project located at Village- Sarah Bhiyani, Tehsil- Kolyat, District-Bikaner, Raj.

Proponent Name- M/s Shree Ram Mines & Minerals, B7, Murlidhar Vyas Colony Bikaner, Rajasthan, E mail- [email protected], [email protected].

Consultant Name- ABC Techno Labs India Pvt. Ltd. Add- 169, Prithviraj Nagar, Maharani Farm Near Vidyasthali School, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Email- [email protected] Brief Details of the projects:

1. EC was issued to the project vide SEIAA letter dated 15.10.2015 as per recommendation of SEAC in its 79th meeting held on 26-27 June 2015 at agenda no. 225. 2. The lease area for which EC was granted is mentioned as 4.7271ha. The PP vide letter dated 21.8.2018 has requested for amendment in EC for reduction of lease area from 4.7271 to 4.0019 ha. Saying that the reduction is on account of overlapping with Khatedaars and other utilities. 3. The PP was called for presentation in 4.4th meeting of SEAC dated 28-30.11.2018. 4. The SEAC perused the request made by the PP vide his letter dated 21.8.018 for amendment in EC dated 15.10.15 for reduction of mining lease area from 4.7271 to 4.0019 due to overlapping of mining leases with other khatedar and other utilities. The SEAC resolved to call the PP on receiving the following: a. Past production Details since inception of mine duly authenticated by the Department of Mines, GOR as per Mining plan/Mining scheme and CTO/CTE since inception of the mine as per annexure referred in MoEF, letter regarding this with supporting documents.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

b. District Survey Report. c. Point wise compliance of earlier EC authenticated by MoEF & CC/RSPCB/SEIAA. d. The PP will conduct a study as to the changes that would occur in the EIA/EMP and the measures to mitigate the variation in environmental issues arising due to the reduction in mine lease area. 5. Accordingly a query letter no. 8731 dated 18.02.19 was issued to the PP. 6. The PP has replied vide letter dated 03.04.19.

Observations and Resolution of the committee:- The SEAC perused the reply dated 03.04.19 submitted by the PP. The PP has submitted district survey report and has informed that no negative impact is envisaged on the environment since it is a case of marginal reduction in the lease area i.e. from 4.7271 hectare to 4.0019 hectare (0.7252 hectare). The SEAC, however, observe that the PP has not submitted year wise past production figures as certified by the mining department since inception of the mine. The PP has also not submitted report of compliance of conditions of EC granted by SEIAA vide letter dated 15.10.2015. The SEAC resolved to ask the PP to submit Past production details since inception of mine duly authenticated by the Department of Mines, GOR, point wise compliance of earlier EC conditions authenticated by MoEF & CC/RSPCB/SEIAA and modified mining plan as the area of lease has been reduced, within a period of 45 days from the receipt of communication in this regard.

Additional Agenda no. 04 F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project/ Cat.1(a)B1 (15113)/ 2018-19

Project Name :-Environmental Clearance for mining project " Amalda China Clay Mine" Project m.l. no.46/80 Area- 32.3743Hect. village -Amalda, Tehsil-Jahazpur, District- Bhilwara, Rajasthan. Proposed capacity -2,11,900TPA

Proponent Name:-M/s Godha & company, Shri Satyaprakash Deedwaniya S/o Shri Ratan lal Deedwaniya, Add.:- D-4, Nagori Garden, Bhilwara Email:- [email protected]

Consultant Name-Team institute Of Science& Technology Pvt. Ltd. Add:- E-65, Chitranjan Marg, C-scheme, jaipur-302001

Background of the Project—

1. The project was called for presentation in 4.7th meeting of SEAC dated 28th , 29th ,30th and 31st January,2019 and SEAC resolved to recommend to SEIAA for grant of EC to the project. 2. Accordingly the file was forwarded to SEIAA by SEAC . 3. The file is referred back by SEIAA to SEAC on 18.04.19 with the noting—

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

“Matter considered in 4.9th meeting of SEIAA held on 18.04.2019. The authority observed had project submitted has habitats, heritage building and 10 forest blocks very close to the project site i.e.within 400 m & decided to seek comments from SEAC & to specifically mention the grounds on which SEAC has recommended to grant EC. The case may be re-submitted with comments to consider in next meeting of SEIAA” Observations and Resolution of the committee:- The project is a china clay mining project (ML No.46/80) having lease area of 32.3743 hectare at village -Amalda, Tehsil-Jahazpur, District- Bhilwara, Rajasthan.The project is an existing one and the PP now intends to increase production from the existing capacity of 2106 TPA to 211900 TPA. The project is covered under category 1(a) B1 of EIA notification dated 14.09.2006. The lease is valid up to 19.12.2032. The mining plan has been approved by the SME, Bhilwara on 11.01.2016. The SEAC had issued TOR to the PP on 28.12.2016 and public hering was held on 24.11.2017. During public hering the no objection / grievance was raised in regard to the functioning of the project. The project does not involve approval/ clearance under the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and Wild Life Protection Act, 1972 as no forest land is involved and neither there is any Wild Life Sancturay/ National Park within 10 Km from the project site. The PP at Environmental Sensitivity Part of form 1 has stated that there are two forts, six protected/reserved forest, eight water bodies and 14 populated areas within 15 km from the boundary of the project site. The nearest fort is at a distance of 0.74 km towards ENE direction; the nearest forest is at a distance of 0.37 km towards SW direction; the nearest water body is at a distance of 1.33 km towards SSW direction and the nearest populated area is at a distance of 0.37 km towards E direction. The PP in order to control and mitigate the impact of minning on the Environment has, in its EMP, proposed detailed measures in regard to prevention, control & abatement of air and noise pollution. The PP has also proposed measures for control of vibration and fly rock generation during blasting. The PP has further suggested measues for biological management including proposal to plant 4280 trees. The SEAC in view of the above measues proposed by the PP for control of pollution and protection of Environment had recommended to SEIAA for grant of EC. The SEAC again examined the matter in pursuance of the decision taken by SEIAA in its 4.9th meeting held on 18.04.19 and decided again to recommend to SEIAA for grant of EC.

Additional Agenda no. 05 F(4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project / Cat. 1(a) B1 (2533)/ 18-19 Project Name :- Environmental Clearance for Expansion under “B2” category for mining lease No. 6/98 for mineral Iron Ore at Village- Bagawas, Tehsil- Virat Nagar, District-Jaipur, Rajasthan Proponent Name:- Madhup Joshi R/o – B242, Circular Road, Nehru Nagar, Jaipur E mail- [email protected] Name of the Consultant:-Geomin Solution Pvt. Ltd. Opp- Pugal House, Old Ginani, Bikaner (raj) E mail- [email protected] Brief Details of the case.:

1. The Matter was considered in the 167th meeting of SEAC held on 19.9.2017 at agenda item no. 13. The committee decided to ask the PP to inform about the details of plantation already undertaken at the mines. Accordingly a letter no. 7568 dated 6.11.2017 was written to the PP. The PP vide letter dated 15.12.2017 and 22.11.2018 submitted the Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

details of the plantation made and the area covered in ha. within and outside the lease area. The tenure of the SEAC expired on 29th December 2017. 2. The reply of the PP was considered in the 4.4th meeting of the reconstituted SEAC held in November 2018 at Additional agenda No. 58.09,wherein the committee perused the letter dated 15.12.2017 and 22.11.2018 of the PP submitted in response to the SEAC letter dated 6.11.2017. The committee was satisfied with the reply however, the Committee was of the view that the PP is required to submit the District Survey Report in view of the Notification dated 14.8.2018. The notification in appendix II makes it mandatory for the PP to submit the District Survey Report as a requirement of EC. Therefore the Committee resolved to ask the PP to furnish District Survey Report so that the case of the PP could be considered thereafter. 3. The PP has submitted the details of the plantation, copy of District Survey Report and an affidavit stating that there has been no violation of the EIA Notification 2006 in terms of Notification dated 14.3.2017 and 8.3.2018. 4. The matter was considered in 4.7th meeting of SEAC dated 28th , 29th ,30th and 31st January, 2019. 5. The committee went through the contents of the reply and record and resolved to recommend to SEIAA for grant of EC. 6. Accordingly the file was sent to SEIAA by SEAC. 7. The file was referred back by SEIAA to SEAC on 18.04.19 for reconsideration of the recommendation with the following comments: “Matter considered in 4.9th meeting held on 18.04.2019. The authority observed that there is an ambiguity in the file. It is not clear whether has is a fresh EC case or its expansion as mine owner has given statement is different from the recommendation of SEAC. Authority decided to seek comments of SEAC.”

Observation and Resolution of the committee :-

The SEAC reconsidered the whole matter in the light of above mentioned comments of SEIAA. The project is an existing project. The PP, in its several documents like at point no. 4 of Form 1 at Flag ‘A’, presentation at Flag ‘B’, point no. 1 of the prefeasibility report at Flag ‘C’ and at point no. 15 of format of mines at Flag ‘D’; has mentioned that the project is an existing one.

The SEAC also looked into and examined the representation dated 21.05.2019 of Sh. Madhup Joshi, a copy dated 28.05.2019 of the same has also been received from SEIAA. Upon thorough enquiry and examination of the whole matter it was found that the PP in its application dated 04.08.2017 had requested for Environmental Clearance from SEIAA for production of 2,10,920 TPA of Iron Ore at M.L. no. 6/98 having lease area of 4.99 hectare.

The said application was made by the PP under B2 category as indicated in Form 1 while stating that the project did not attract general conditions. B2 projects are the projects which do not require Environment Impact Assessment Report and also do not need to undergo public consultation and such projects are appraised on the basis of prescribed application form and other relevant documents. Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

Therefore, the SEAC, in its 4.7th meeting held on 28th, 29th, 30th and 31st January, 2019, took decision to recommend to SEIAA for grant of EC.

The mineral proposed to be mined out by the PP is Iron Ore which is a major mineral and also attracts general conditions. Minor minerals of B2 category do not attract General conditions even if they are located within 5 Km from the boundary of National Park, Wild Life Sanctuary, Critically polluted area, Eco-sensitive area or Interstate/ International boundaries. All major mineral projects irrespective of the lease area become ‘A’ category projects if they are located within 5 Km from the boundary of National Park, Wild Life Sanctuary, Critically polluted area, Eco-sensitive area or Interstate/ International boundaries and are appraised by the MoEF & CC. The activity of major minerals having lease area of less than 5 hectare were not covered either under EIA notification, 1994 or EIA notification, 2006 prior to 07.10.2014. Such activities/ projects involving mining of major minerals was brought under the purview of the EIA notification dated 07.10.2014. The project of the PP for mining of Iron Ore in the lease area of 4.99 hectare was therefore, a B1 project and involved preparation of EIA /EMP reports and also requires public consultation and being so the PP should have made application for obtaining Terms of Reference instead of seeking EC from SEIAA. Only the projects of minor minerals having lease area less than 5 hectare are appraised as B2 projects. The PP, besides stating that his project was a B2 category project also wrongly stated in his application that the general conditions did not apply to his Iron Ore project. General conditions are applicable to all major minerals projects irrespective of the lease area if such projects are located within the regulated distance of 5 Km from the above stated areas. The SEAC in its 4.7th meeting held on 28th, 29th, 30th and 31st January, 2019 arrived at a decision to recommend to SEIAA for grant of EC to the PP because of false incorrect and misleading information submitted by the PP that the project was a B2 project.

The SEAC therefore, in view of above observations resolved to issue ToR to the PP with public consultation as per Annexure “B”.

Additional Agenda no. 06 F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project / Cat. 8(a) (15606)/ 2018-19

Project Name :- EC our proposed project-"Mahatma Resorts" promoted by "Mahatma Resorts Pvt.Ltd." Coming up at khasra No. 4203 to 4208,5126,5519/4191,5520/4187,5521/5127,Village- Sisarma, Tehsil-Girwa, Udaipur, Rajasthan with Total plot area:62,423.78 Sq.m. and Built up area:-37,444,57 Sq.m. ,(Proposal No-89737)

Proponent Name :- Mahatma Resorts Pvt. Ltd. Vishal Kapoor, Village-Paloda, Tehsil- Garhi, Banswara, Rajasthan, [email protected]; [email protected]

Name of the consultant: - Enkay Enviro Services Pvt. Ltd., Add-92 Heera Nagar - A, Near Shalimar Bagh, Ajmer Road, Distt.- Jaipur (Raj.) Eamil:- [email protected]

Brief Details of the Project: Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

1. The project was considered for presentation in 4.8th meeting of SEAC dated 25th&26th February, 2019. 2. Following deficiencies were observed during 4.8th meeting- a. The location of the proposed STP and rain water harvesting to be relocated considering the available slope to help in gravitational flow. b. Since the total slope in the entire plot area is 60 mts, the road should have some flat portions in between instead of a continuous gradual slope. This should be incorporated and map be submitted accordingly. c. The exit point from the premises should be properly modified so as to avoid possibility of accidents from vehicles moving on the main road with those coming out of the proposed project. Proper drawings showing such modification be submitted. d. Revised CER as per need base of the local area be submitted. e. The project falls within 10 kms of the Sajjangarh Wildlife Sanctuary hence the PP should apply for NOC for NBWL as per MoEF OM dated 2.12.2009 and submit a copy thereof. f. For mitigation of emissions arising during construction (cutting and filling) details of measures to be adopted should be submitted. Copy of certificate from UIT that the project does not fall in no construction zone. 3. The PP was asked, during presentation, to submit its clarification/reply on the above points without waiting for any formal communication from SEAC. The SEAC, however, vide letter dated 09.05.19 informed the PP to furnish its reply on the above points. 4. The PP on the basis of observations of the committee during presentation submitted its reply vide its letter dated 30.04.19 & 03.05.19.

Observation and Resolution of the committee:

The PP, vide letter dated 30.04.19 and 03.05.19, has submitted revised proposal on the observations made at point no. a, b, c, d & f, mentioned above. The SEAC is satisfied with the reply on these points. The PP on point no.‘e’ of the observations has said that as per EIA notification dated 14.09.2006, general conditions are not applicable on 8(a) category project and thus same is not applicable. The reply of PP on point no.‘e’ is not acceptable. The issue in the matter is not of the applicability of the general conditions which are relevant for the purpose of determining whether a project would be appraised by the MoEF or by SEAC. The project undoubtedly is a B category project and being so appraisable by SEAC. The purpose of query at point no.‘e’ is to secure compliance of the OM dated 02.12.2009 of the MoEF & CC, which is independent of the applicability of the general conditions. The project falls within 10 Km of Sajjangarh Wild Life Sanctuary. The OM dated 02.12.2009 of the MoEF & CC provides that while granting EC to the project located within 10 Km of the National Park/ Wild Life Sanctuary, a specific condition should be stipulated in the EC that it is subject to obtaining prior clearance from forestry and Wild Life as applicable. The SEAC therefore considered it necessary that the PP is required to take clearance from the NBWL as per the OM dated 02.12.2009 of the MoEF & CC. The SEAC, therefore, resolved to ask the PP to apply for obtaining clearance from the standing committee of National Board of Wild Life (NBWL) and submit a copy thereof to the SEAC within a period of 45 days.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

Additional Agenda no. 07 F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project/ Cat.8(a) (15555)/18-19

Project Name :- Environmental Clearance for Proposed Affordable Housing Project " Archi Galaxy, at village Zinc Smelter Debari, Tehsil Girwa, Udaipur, Rajasthan.

Proponent Name:- Sh. Rishabh Kumar Bhanawat,Project InCharge,M/s ArchiArihant Ground floor, ArchiArihant Apartment, 100ft road, Shobhagpura, Udaipur, Rajasthan Email:- [email protected] [email protected]

Name of Consultant :- Gaurang Environment Solutions Pvt.Ltd. Add:- 501, Paris Point , Collectorate Circle, Bani Park, Jaipur(Raj.) Email;- [email protected] Brief details of the Project:- 1. The project was considered for presentation in 4.5th meeting of SEAC dated 26- 28.12.2018. 2. Keeping in view the presentation made by the PP and its Consultants and discussion held during the meeting, the SEAC asked the PP to submit the following information:. a. Measures to be taken to neutralize the effect of pollution as the place is adjoining HZL. b. Source of water as the ground water is polluted. c. Details of parking for commercial activity to be submitted. d. Fire escape stair case should be in open and not enclosed from all sides. e. Revised CER as per need base. f. Provision AMC for O&M of STP. g. Safe distance of the HT line from the commercial block should be ensured. h. The PP informed that he will submit the desired information during the course of the day. The SEAC agreed to it and the PP submitted certain information vide letter 27.12.2018. The SEAC perused the information submitted by the PP and found that certain information has been left out in his letter dated 27.12.2018. The SEAC resolved that the PP should submit information on the points which have been left out by him in his letter dated 27.12.2018. 3. Accordingly a query letter no. 8750 dated 06.03.19 was issued to the PP. 4. The pp has replied vide its letter dated 27.03.19. 5. Reply of the PP was considered in 4.9th meeting of SEAC dated 09-10.04.2019. 6. The SEAC considered the project and perused the point wise reply submitted by the PP on 27.03.19. The SEAC observed that the proposal submitted by PP with respect to CER activities are not as per the OM dated 01.05.2018 of MoEF & CC. Since the cost of the project is Rs 187 crores, the PP is required to spend Rs 2.8 crores. The PP has submitted proposal for Rs 1.17 crores only. 7. The committee resolved to recommend to SEIAA for EC to the project. 8. Accordingly the file was sent to SEIAA. 9. SEIAA considered the project in its 4.12th meeting dated 14.05.19 and accordingly file was referred back to SEAC on 15.05.19 for comments.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

“Matter considered in 4.12th meeting of SEIAA held on 14.05.2019. The authority observed that in the column of environmental sensitivity a forest block has been named as RF at a distance of 0.8 Km which has not named and the map showing 10 Km radius of the location of the project is also blurred, hence it is difficult to determine whether this block is a part of sanctuary or not. The authority decided to seek clarification from SEAC.”

Observation and Resolution of the committee:-

The SEAC reexamined the case in the light of the aforesaid observation of the SEIAA. In point no. 2, of the environmental sensitivity part of Form- 1, the PP has stated that one RF is situated at a distance of 0.8 Km towards ENE direction and another RF is situated at 14.3 Km towards W direction, however, the PP has not mentioned the names of these RF. Also the GT sheet of 15 Km radius submitted by the PP is on a higher scale and PP has further not marked forest area vis-à-vis distance from project site in the GT sheet. The PP should also clearly state that no part of any forest blocks in radius of 10 Km is part of Wild Life Sanctuary/National Park. Therefore, the SEAC resolved to ask the PP to submit GT sheet of low scale with clear print depicting all the forest blocks that falls within 15 Km radius from the project site along with their names and also submit the revised Form no -1 mentioning name of all the forest blocks (PF, RF, Wild Life Sanctuary, National Park etc.) which fall within 15 Km radius from the project site. The PP should also clearly state that no part of any forest block in the radius of 10 Km is part of Wild Life Sanctuary/ National Park. The PP be asked to submit the above information/documents within 45 days from the date of issue of query letter.

Additional Agenda no. 08 F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project / Cat. 1(a)B2(15207)/ 18-19)

Name of Project-Environmental Clearance for our Mining project "China Clay" Quartz, Feldspar and Silica sand stone Mine ( ML.NO. 1/96 )" ML.Area:- 20.0ha annual production - 70,500 TPA Expanson capcity - 207430 TPA Near village - Nimli, Tehsil- Viratnagar, Distt- Jaipur , Rajasthan . Promoted by M/s Modi Levigated Kaolin pvt. Ltd.

Project Proponent :- M/s Modi Levigated Kaolin pvt. Ltd. Authorized Singnatory: shri Antarksh Modi, Add:- Opposite Railway Station, Neem ka Thana , Sikar , E-mail:- [email protected] , [email protected]

Name of Consultant: -Team Institute Of Science &Technology Pvt. Ltd., Add:- E-65 , Chitranjan Marg, C-scheme, Jaipur Raj.

Brief Details of the Project:

1. The Project was considered in the 151st meeting of SEAC held on 2.2.2017 and the committee resolved to recommend to SEIAA to grant EC. Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

2. The matter was considered by SEIAA and was referred back to SEAC on 24.3.2017 with a comment that khasara number of the lease area has not been mentioned in the records. 3. The matter was considered in the 162nd meeting of SEAC held on 15.6.2017 at additional agenda no. 49.02. The committee resolved to a letter to the PP for furnishing kahsra number along with documentary proof. Vide letter dated 3.8.2017. 4. The matter was further considered by SEAC, after receiving information sought from the PP, in 171st meeting held on 5.12.2017 at agenda no 58. The committee observed that the PP did not appear for presentation, there was no prior information about the absence. The Committee resolved to issue warning letter regarding absence while giving 30 days time for submitting reply. 5. The PP vide its letter dated 16.11.2018 has submitted the details of tehsil and khasara number authorized by the mining engineer along with reports of 3 patwaris as the mine falls in 3 villages according to which the khasra nos. are as follows: a. Village Nimli (Teh. Virat Nagar) Khasara no. 3 area 0.506 ha., Khasra No. 4 area 0.024 ha., b. Village Basdi Ganeshpura (Teh. Shahpura) Khasra no. 1 area 1.3170 ha., Khasra no. 2 area 0.1140 ha. c. Village Buchara (The. Kotputali) Khasara no. 1779 area 18.039. 6. Matter was considered in 4.4th meeting of SEAC dated 28-30.11.2018 and the committee resolved to recommend to SEIAA for grant of EC. 7. Accordingly the file was sent to SEIAA. 8. The file was referred back from SEIAA to SEAC on 03.04.19 with the following observation. “Considered in 4.7th meeting of SEIAA held on 29.03.2019, authority examined the case and found in form no. 1 at point no. 21 the PP has mentioned status of land as diversified forest land and in the same form in environmental sensitivity; no forest land has been mentioned in the vicinity of 15 Km. file may be send to SEAC for clarification from PP.” 10. The SEIAA’s observation was considered in 4.9th meeting of SEAC dated 09- 10.04.2019. 11. The SEAC examined the whole matter and the record/ documents available in the file. It is true that the PP has mentioned in form no. 1 as “No” against serial no. 2 of part III relating to environmental sensitivity seeking information regarding areas which are important or sensitive for ecological reasons, wet lands, water courses or other water bodies, coastal zone, bio spheres, mountains, forest. But the PP at serial no. 21 of the same form 1 has mentioned the above status of land as diversified forest land. This anomaly came to the notice of SEAC during presentation in the 151th meeting held on 02.02.2017 and the SEAC verbally asked the PP during the meeting to rectify the mistake and state the correct position. The PP thereafter submitted corrected information which is available in the file at Flag “A”. The SEAC therefore is of the view that no clarification is called for from the PP. Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

12. The SEAC resolved to resubmit the file to SEIAA with the above observation. 13. Accordingly the file was sent to SEIAA. 14. SEIAA considered the project in its 4.12th meeting dated 14.05.19 and accordingly file was referred back to SEAC on 15.05.19 with following comments. “Matter considered in 4.12th meeting of SEIAA held on 14.05.2019. The authority found that although SEAC has resubmitted the file but the basic questions raised in earlier meeting remains unanswered. Authority decided send back file to SEAC for clarification.”

Observation and Resolution of the committee:-

The SEAC reexamined the matter in the light of the aforesaid observation of SEIAA. The PP, vide application dated 30.11.2016, had applied for EC for Expansion in production capacity from 70,500 TPA to 2,07,430 TPA for mining of China Clay, Quartz, Feldspar and Silica Sand (ML.NO. 1/96 ), Lease Area:- 20.0ha, Khasara no. 3 (area 0.506 ha.) & Khasra No. 4 (area 0.024 ha.) of Village Nimli,Teh. Virat Nagar, Khasra no. 1 (area 1.3170 ha) & Khasra no. 2 (area 0.1140 ha) of Village Basdi Ganeshpura, Teh. Shahpura and Khasara no. 1779 (area 18.039 ha) of Village Buchara (Kotputali) at near village - Nimli, Tehsil- Viratnagar, Distt- Jaipur, Rajasthan. The mining lease is valid upto 31.03.2020. The PP had earilar obtained EC from the MOEF & CC wide letter dated 03.03.2005 for expansion of production of the above minerals from 20000 TPA to 70500 TPA. The project cost is Rs 25 lakhs. The PP in form no 1 has stated that the project involves forest land whereas it does not attract the provision of the Wild Life Protection Act, 1972. Regarding involvement of the project in the forest land and its diversification for non forest purpose i.e mining, the PP has submitted letter dated 08.03.2000 of the MOEF &CC conveying approval under section 2 of the FC Act 1980 having validity for a period of 10 years and also letter dated 04.07.2016 of the Deputy Conservator of Forest Jaipur (North) further extending period of validity of diversion of forest land for mining of the above minerals.

The SEAC, therefore, resolved to refer the matter to SEIAA for grant of EC as per SEAC earlier recommendation made in 151th meeting held on 02.02.2017.

Additional Agenda no. 09 F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project / Cat. 1(a) B1 (15330)/ 18-19/

Name of Project- E.C. for Karoti Dhaniya Iron ore mine with crusher ML No. 3/99, Area – 5.00, ha. Khasra no. – 1126, Capacity:- 11232 TPA at village – Karoti Dhaniya, Tehsil – Udaipurwati, District – Jhunjhunu, State - (Raj.) Project proponent :- Smt. Shikha Modi (Project In Charge) W/O Shri Chhagan Modi, R/O. Village :- Chhawani, Tehsil – Neem ka Thana , District:- Sikar (Raj.) Email:- [email protected]

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

Name of Consultant: - M/S- Ramji Mine Envirotech , plot no-21, first Floor , Aarna- 2 Tower, Kartarpura Industrial Area, Jaipur, Rajasthan- 302006 E-mail: [email protected]

Brief details of the Project:- 1. The project was considered for presentation in 4.4th meeting of SEAC dated 28- 30.11.2018. 2. Keeping in view the presentation made by the PP and its Consultants and discussion held during the meeting, the SEAC resolved to seek following information from the PP giving 45 days’ time for submission from the date of issue of query letter: a) The PP should submit the Conservation plan for Peacock. b) Revised EMP to be submitted. c) Revised CER to be submitted. d) Capacity of crusher not submitted. e) Reply to point no. 18 of meeting notice dated 2.11.2018 has not been submitted. f) Form no. 2 not submitted. g) Affidavit regarding violation not submitted h) Point wise compliance of the meeting notice to be submitted. 3. Accordingly a query letter no. 8680 dated 18.02.19 was issued to the PP. 4. The pp has replied vide its letter dated 15.03.19. The PP has informed that his project falls in khasra no. 1126. 5. Reply of the PP was considered in 4.9th meeting of SEAC dated 09-10.04.2019. 6. The SEAC considered the project and perused the point wise reply submitted by the PP and the committee resolved to recommend to SEIAA for EC to the project. 7. Accordingly the file was sent to SEIAA. 8. SEIAA considered the project in its 4.12th meeting dated 14.05.19 and accordingly file was referred back to SEAC on 15.05.19 with following comments. “Matter considered in 4.12th meeting of SEIAA held on 14.05.2019. The authority found that there is discrepancy in the information submitted in the column of environmental sensitivity and the map of 10 Km radius submitted. Kankariya PF, Norangpura block, Bhudoli block are although shown in the map they have not disclosed in the form. The authority decided to send the file to SEAC and seek the correct information for the environmental sensitivity column.”

Observation and Resolution of the committee:-

The SEAC reexamined the case in the light of aforesaid observation of the SEIAA. In Form-1 part III under environmental sensitivity point no. 3 the PP has mentioned 3 forest blocks viz . Kankariya block PF 6.44 Km in NW, Balwar Chaukri block PF 12.63 Km in SW and Khandela block PF in 13.96 Km in NW direction. However, in GT sheet (monitoring 10Km radius) Norangpura block PF and Bhudoli PF forest area are also marked. Thus there is a discrepancy in forest areas falling in 10 Km radius from project site. The PP vide letter dated 21.05.2019 has submitted revised environmental sensitivity Form-1 along with GT sheet of 10

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

Km radius in which Kankariya block PF, Norangpura block PF and Bhudoli PF have also been shown, which are within the 10 Km radius from the project site.

The SEAC, therefore, resolved to refer the matter to SEIAA for grant of EC as per SEAC earlier recommendation made in 4.9th meeting held on 09-10 April 2019.

Additional Agenda no. 10 F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project / Cat.7(g)B(15597)/ 2018-19

Project Name:- EC of Neemach Mata Ropeway at Udaipur Rajasthan promoted by Damodar Ropeways & Infra Ltd. Area-05535hec, Khasra no-1628 for upper Terminal and partial corridor and khasra no-2433 for Lower Terminal and partial corridor. (Proposal No-78147) Project Proponent Name-The Secretary, Urban Improvement Trust (UIT), Add-Saheli Marg, Udaipur, Rajasthan. Designation- Mr.DK Bansal, Email- [email protected] Consultant Name-Min Mec Consultancy Pvt. Ltd. Add-A-121,Paryavaran Complex, IGNOU Road,new Delhi, [email protected]; Website-www.minmec.co.in Brief Details of the Project:

1. The project was called for presentation in 4.8th meeting of SEAC dated 25-26.02.2019. 2. During the meeting the PP and the consultant referred the OM dated 24.12.2013 of MoEF & CC wherein areal Rope way has been considered to be a project of B-2 category. The Committee considered the case as B-2 category. 3. Since the project falls within 10 kms of Sajjangarh Wildlife Sanctuary, the OM dated 2.12.2009 of MoEF &CC is applicable. The SEAC resolved to recommend to SEIAA to issue EC on receiving the copy of the application by PP to NBWL for NOC. The PP informed to have applied for NOC to NBWL vide letter dated 26.3.2019.The PP also submitted the affidavits regarding non violation of the EIA Notification dated 14.3.2017 and 8.3.2018. 4. Keeping in view the information contained in the documents submitted, the presentation made by the P.P. before the SEAC, Rajasthan in its 4.8th meeting held on 25- 26thFeb.2019, after detailed deliberations and clarifications, the members were satisfied with the proposals , documents and reply of the queries and resolved to recommend to SEIAA for the grant of E.C. 5. Accordingly the file was sent to SEIAA. 6. SEIAA considered the project in its 4.11th meeting dated 03.05.19 and accordingly file was referred back to SEAC on 10.05.19 with following comments: “Matter considered in 4.11th meeting of SEIAA held on 03.05.2019. It was observed that PP had to apply for Wild Life clearance to NBWL as the project in 10 Km radius of Sajjangarh Sanctuary. The PP, if has applied status is not in file hence file may be send back to SEAC for necessary action.”

Observation and Resolution of the committee:-

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

The SEAC re -examined the case in the light of aforesaid observation of the SEIAA. The project lies within 10 Km radius from Sajjangarh Wild Life Sanctuary. The Proposed project location is 2.8 Km away (arial distance) from the boundary of Sajjangarh Wild Life Sanctuary. Eco Sensitive Zone (ESZ) of Sajjangarh Wild Life Sanctuary has been notified by MoEF & CC on 12.02.2017. The project site is not part of Eco Sensitive Zone (ESZ) as is evident from letter dated 23.02.2018 of the CCF, Wild Life, Udaipur. The PP has also submitted application, online for seeking approval for Wild Life clearance on 26.02.2019 and in proof of that a copy of the receipt has been submitted which is available in file at page 176-177. The remark as this system generated mail reads that the proposal will be examined by Wild Life Warden, Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 to assess its competence.

As required by the MoEF OM dated 02.12.2009, the PP has already submitted application for Wild Life clearance which is available at page no. 176-177 of the file. The SEAC resolved to refer the matter to SEIAA for taking decision as per the earlier recommendation of the SEAC for grant of EC.

Additional Agenda no. 11 F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project /Cat.1(a)B1(4232) /18-19/

Project Name :- EC for manufacturing of single super phosphate (350 TPD) and Granular single super phosphate (350 TPD) of M/s Anapoorana Fertilizer & Pesticides Pvt. Ltd, at plot no 897/129/2, Village Doriya, Tehsil Nimbahera, District Chittorhgarh, Rajasthan Proponent Name:-Shri P.N. Jethwani, 252, Adarsh Colony, Tehsil Nimbahera, District Chittorgarh Email: [email protected] Name of consultant:- M/s EQMS India Pvt. Ltd., Delhi (S.No.38 in List-A of NABET) [email protected] Brief details of the Project:-

1) ToR was issued to the project as per the presentation in the 93rd Meeting of SEAC vide letter no. 4950 dated 31st Dec. 2015. 2) The PP submitted the final EIA/EMP reports vide letter received in SEAC on 22.10.2018. 3) The term of the earlier SEAC expired on 29thDecember, 2017, The new SEAC has been reconstituted on 12.9.2018. 4) The PP was called for presentation in the 4.3rd meeting of SEAC held on 29th -30th October 2018 at agenda no. 8 5) The PP didn’t reply to meeting the Notice. The SEAC Members did not get the complete documents. Reports were unsigned. No affidavits submitted. 6) The committee resolved that since the PP and the consultant have not submitted the point wise reply to the meeting along with necessary documents and the report submitted is unsigned and does not contain required information as per the EIA Notification , and no affidavits have been submitted , the PP should submit a revised report as per the meeting Notice. The Consultant was warned regarding this during the meeting. 7) The PP circulated the revised documents to all the members and the PP and consultant made a request to present the case during the 4.8th meeting of SEAC. The committee members accepted to have received the documents and agreed to allow the PP to make a presentation. Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

8) Accordingly the project was called for presentation in 4.8th meeting of SEAC dated 25- 26.02.2019. 9) During presentation the PP expressed that the proposed project is not a case of violation. He was informed that in case the proposal is found to be a case of violation, in terms of theMoEF & CC Notification dated 14.03.2017 and 8.03.2018, the PP shall be solely responsible for being proceeded against in accordance with law. Keeping in view the information contained in the documents submitted, the presentation made by the P.P. before the SEAC, Rajasthan in its 4.8thmeeting held on 25-26thFeb. 2019, after detailed deliberations and clarifications, the members were satisfied with the proposals, documents and reply of the queries and resolved to recommend to SEIAA for the grant of E.C. 10) Accordingly the file was sent to SEIAA. 11) SEIAA considered the project in its 4.11th meeting dated 03.05.19 and accordingly file was referred back to SEAC on 10.05.19 with following comments. “Matter considered in 4.11th meeting of SEIAA held on 03.05.2019. The authority found that names of forest blocks in adjoining area are indicated as a, b & c and there names are not given. The file may be send back to SEAC for detailed information and clarification.”

Observation and Resolution of the committee:-

The SEAC re-examined the case in the light of aforesaid observation of the SEIAA. The committee observed that PP had not submitted Form-1 mentioning details and name of nearby forest blocks located within 15 Km radius from the project site. Also the GT sheet of 15 Km radius submitted by the PP is on a higher scale and PP has not marked forest area vis- à-vis distance from project site in the GT sheet. Therefore, the SEAC resolved to ask the PP to submit GT sheet of low scale with clear print depicting all the forest blocks that falls within 15 Km radius from the project site along with their name and also submit the revised Form no -1 mentioning name of all the forest blocks (PF, RF, Wild Life Sanctuary, National Park etc.) which falls within 15 Km radius from project site. The PP be asked to submit the above information/details within 45 days from the date of issue of query letter.

Additional Agenda no. 12. F1 (4)/SEIAA/SEAC-Raj/Sectt/Project /Cat. 8(a)(15692)/2018-19

Project Name :- EC for the proposed Residential & Commercial Township at Khasra Nos: 114/2, 114/5, 115, 129,122/1, 124/1, 124,125,126,126/1,127/1,127/2,127/3,127/4, in pal village & Khasra no. 210, 211 & 212 in Gangana Village, Tehsil & Dist-Jodhpur,(Rajasthan) of M/S.Aasan Realty Pvt. Ltd. -Submission of Environmental Clearance Application Reg. (Proposal No-93116). Proponent Name:- M/S. Aasan Realty Pvt. Ltd., Add-412 A, 4th Floor, Chiranjiv Tower, 43 Nehru Place, new Delhi,[email protected] Name of the consultant: - J.M. EnviroNet Pvt.Ltd. Add:- 202-A, ABW Tower, MG Road, IFFCO Chowk, Sector25, Gurugram Email:- [email protected] Brief Details of the Project:

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

1. The project was called for presentation in 4.8th meeting of SEAC dated 25-26.02.2019. 2. The PP and Consultant submitted a letter dated 25.2.2019 in the beginning of the meeting wherein he stated that certain Khasara numbers have been updated in the report and that the same should be considered in Final Technical presentation. The SEAC considered the contents of the request letter and enclosed report and accepted the request made by the PP. 3. The committee resolved to recommend to SEIAA for grant of EC to the project. 4. Accordingly the file was sent to SEIAA. 5. SEIAA considered the project in its 4.11th meeting dated 03.05.19 and accordingly file was referred back to SEAC on 10.05.19 with following comments. “Matter considered in 4.11th meeting of SEIAA held on 03.05.2019. The authority observed that there is some discrepancy regarding Khasra no. of the location of site and decided to get it verified from SEAC.”

Observation and Resolution of the committee:-

The SEAC considered the matter and observed that the details of all khasra no. which are involved in the project are not reflected in the minutes of 4.8th meeting of SEAC held on 25-26 Feb, 2019. The PP, had infact, during presentation in the SEAC meeting held on 25.02.2019 submitted a letter mentioning updated/changed khasra no. and had also requested to consider the same while appraising the project. However, due to oversightness the updated/changed khasra no. were left from being included in the minutes of the meeting held on 25-26 Feb, 2019.

As the PP had already requested for making corrections in khasra no, during the meeting held on 25-26 Feb, 2019, the SEAC, resolved to refer the matter back to SEIAA for taking decision as per the earlier recommendation of the SEAC for grant of EC with the following correction/ rectifications in the minutes. Project name may be replaced as follows: EC for Proposed Residential & Commercial Township Project at Khasra Nos. 115 MI, 115/2 MI, 114/2, 114/5, 120, 122/1, 124/1, 124, 126, 125, 125/1, 125/2, 125/3, 125/4, 125/5, 126/1, 127/2, 127/3 in Village Pal & Khasra No. 210, 211 & 212 in Village Gangana, Tehsil & District: Jodhpur (Rajasthan) of M/s. Aasan Realty Pvt. Ltd. The table under brief details of the project be replaced as follows:

1. Category / Item Cat.8 (a) no. (in Schedule): 2. Location of Khasra Nos.: 115 MI, 115/2 MI, 114/2, 114/5, 120, 122/1, 124/1, 124, 126, Project 125, 125/1, 125/2, 125/3, 125/4, 125/5, 126/1, 127/2, 127/3 in Village Pal & Khasra No. 210, 211 & 212 in Village Gangana, Tehsil & District: Jodhpur (Rajasthan) 3. Project Details Items Details Total Plot Area 308425.19 sq. m (76.2135 Acres)

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

Area reserve for future 123468.42 sq. m (30.5097 Acres) developments 184956.77 sq. m (45.7038 Acres) S. Particulars Area (sq. No. m) 1 AREA UNDER RESIDENTIAL 52637.20 USE a. Area Under Group Housing-3 5916.70 b. Area Under Plotted 46720.50 Development (Villas) 2 AREA UNDER COMMERCIAL 1474.58 Net Planned USE Area of the a. Area Under Convenient 1474.58 project (Phase 1) Shopping 3 AREA UNDER FACILITIES 8741.32 a. Area under Substation 3948.97 b. Area under Treated Water Plant 1469.42 c. Area under STP 2881.64 d. Area under TE / PO 441.29 e. PARK & COMMON OPEN 30848.02 SPACE f. AREA UNDER ROADS 91255.64 Total 184956.77

Total Built up 119553.78 sq. m. (BAR: 100472.18 sq. m + Non FAR: area for Phase 11541.60 sq. m + Basement : 7540 sq. m) 1 B.A.R. (sq. m.) Proposed: 100472.18 sq. m. for Phase 1 Ground Coverage for Proposed: 33733.62 sq. m. Phase 1 Maximum 45.0 M. Height Number of 1 Tower of Group Housing + Villas + Convenaient Shoping Towers/Blocks Total Number Total = 600 dwelling units (320 Villas + 280 units of Dwelling Flats) Units Number of 2 Basement + Stilt + 14 Uper Floors floors Estimated Total population: 4556 Persons Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

Population Fixed population: 3960 Persons Floating population: 596 Persons Page no. 64 of Conceptual Plan 4. Details of None, Construction will be carried out after issued EC letter. construction taken place at site 5. Parking Required Parking: Particular Calculation Total Required Parking (ECU) Parking 1 Villa required Parking @1 ECU 320 Requirement for (up to Plot Area 250 sq.m.) Villas 320 Villas x 1ECU =320 ECU Parking BAR/115 sq.m. 337 requirement for 32142.20/115 sq.m.= 280 ECU Flats Extra Visitor Parking= up to 100 ECU@25% + Further 100 ECU@20% and Further 200-300 ECU@15% = 57 Total = 280+57=337 ECU Commercial Commercial Area Parking = 25 Parking BAR/75 Requirements 1474.58/75= 19.66 Say 20 ECU 25% Visitor Parking =5 ECU Total Parking = 25 ECU Total Required Parking 682 ECU Proposed Parking: Total Area (in sq. Proposed Parking Type of Parking m.) ECU Surface Parking (@23 sq. 11408.40 496 m. per ECU) Stilt Parking (@28 sq. m. 1293.80 39 per ECU) Basement Parking (@32 7540 230 sq. m. per ECU) Total - 765 ECU (Page no. 68 of Conceptual Plan) 6. Project Cost: Rs. 156 Cr. (Approx) (Page no. 64 of Conceptual Plan) 7. Water Total Water requirement will be 538 KLD Requirement per Fresh Water: 267 KLD day & Source Recycled Water: 271 KLD Source: Municipal Water Supply

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

(Page no. 64 of Conceptual Plan)

8. Fuel & Energy:- Connected Load : 11751 KW, Essential : 5916 KW, Source: JDVVNL Power Backup: 2 No. of D.G. sets of total capacity 360 KVA (2X180 KVA) (Page no. 64 of Conceptual Plan) 9. Application No. SEAC File No.: 15692 & Date & Proposal No.: SIA/RJ/NCP/93116/2019, dated: 28/01/2019 documents submitted 10 Environment EMP Cost Management Construction Phase Operation Phase Plan with Approximate Recurring Cost Approximate Recurring Cost budgetary Cost (Lacs) (Lacs) Cost (Lacs) (Lacs) provision. 55.00 15.00 103.00 30.00 (Page no. 64 of Conceptual Plan) 11 CSR Activities Expenditure for CER/CSR as per MoEF Office Memorandum dated 01.05.2018 will be of Rs. 2.34 Cr (1.50% of the total project cost: 156 Cr.). The C.E.R. & C.S.R. activities proposed as per MoEF&CC O.M. dated 01.05.2018 will be drinking water supply, Sanitation, Health, Education, Skill development, Solid waste management facilities, Rain water harvesting, Avenue plantation and plantation in community areas within 10 km radius of project site as per need base discussion of the area. Detailed budgetary allocation for CER/CSR activities as follows: Details of Activities to be done under C.E.R. & C.S.R. Expenditure (Lacs)

Construction and renovation work, distribution of 11.00 Furniture, computer, Printer, Water Cooler, solar Panels, Internet faculties and plantation work in Govt school, Pal, Luni, Jodhpur & Govt school Shastri Nagar Jodhpur Development of Literature Research and Historical 181.00 Restoration Centre in Project Site Infrastructural development along with Furniture 20.00 and equipment in Govt. Health Department of block Luni Jodhpur Distribution of Furniture, Computer, Almirah and 2.00 medical instrument in Govt. Veterinary Hospital Bashni, Jodhpur Skill Development programmes through Enhancing 10.00 Education Quality Through Digital Empowerment in Area

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

Construction of waste collection Facilities in the 10.00 area with consultation of Jodhpur Nagar Nigam. TOTAL AMOUNT ON CER ACTIVITIES WILL BE Rs. 2.34 Cr (1.50% of the total project cost: 156 Cr.). (Presentation Slide no. 47) 12 STP STP of 351 KLD capacity (Page no. 64 of Conceptual Plan) 13 Green Belt/ 30848.02 sq. m (~ 10 % of total plot Area) Plantation area (Page no. 64 of Conceptual Plan) and % of total area in sq. mts. 14 Budgetary Rs. 10.50 Lacs Breakup for (Presentation Slide no. 47) Labour 15 Present status Vacant land

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

Annexure ‘A’ General TOR:

1. The validity period of this ToRs letter would be for a period of three years from the date of dispatch of the ToRs letter.

2. The study area will comprise 10 km zone around the mine lease from lease periphery and the data contained in the EIA with respect to mining operations such as conceptual pit limits, waste generation etc. should be for the life of the mine/lease period.

3. Location of other industries & mines within the study area along with their production and pollutants generated by them, estimated pollution load and cumulative impact on environment including the proposed project should be submitted. The same shall be accounted for while generating mathematical models of pollution dispersion for preparation of the EMP.

4. In the case of existing mine, year-wise production (since inception of the mines) details clearly indicating the proposed highest production for the life of the mine/lease period should be submitted.

5. Details of land to be used as the designated dumping site for OB dump should be selected and proposed within the lease area as per the approved mining plan. In no case the overburden should be dumped outside the lease area, however proposal for utilization of OB for construction or other meaningful use to the extent possible may be submitted and should try to work on zero waste patterns. Details regarding quantity of solid waste generation to be estimated and details for its disposal and dump management are to be provided.

6. Land use plan of the mine lease area should be prepared to encompass pre-operational, operational and post operational phases.

7. The P.P. should provide a mining plan along-with progressive mine closer plan and implementation plan at the time of submission of application for the EC.

8. Based on the study and the points raised by the people during public hearing, the P.P. shall work out an effective plan to address the environmental, socio-economic and other issues identified during the process, with suitable funds allocation for the purpose. Further PP shall implement all commitments made during public hearing, while implementing the project.

9. Certificate regarding mine lease area not falling in the Aravalli Hills issued by the Mining Engineer/ Assistant Mining Engineer in the prescribed format, as per the instructions contained in the letter no. DMG/ADM/Env/EC/F11/06/17-76 dt. 17.01.2011 issued by the Director, Department of Mines and Geology, GoR, Udaipur, should be submitted.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

10. List/details within 10 km radius of the mine lease area, the location of human settlement, water bodies, Reserve Forest, National Parks, Sanctuaries, Biosphere Reserves, Wildlife Corridors, Tiger/Elephant reserves (existing / proposed), shall be clearly indicated giving the land use. Necessary clearance, if any, as may be applicable to such projects due to proximity of the ecologically sensitive areas as mentioned above shall be obtained from the Chief Wildlife Warden under the Wildlife (Protection) Act’ 1972 and submitted. This location map should also indicate the list and location of other mine leases existing, if any, within 10 km radius.

11. The ToR is subject to the specific condition that the PP shall obtain prior clearance from forestry and wild life angle including clearance from Standing Committee of the National Board Wild Life if applicable. It is further categorically stated that grant of EC does not necessary implies that forestry and wild life clearance shall be granted to the project and that their proposals for forestry and wild life clearance will be considered by the respective authorities on their merits and decision taken. The investment made in the project, if any, based on environment clearance so granted, in anticipation of the clearance from forestry and wildlife angle shall be entirely at the cost and risk of the project proponent and Ministry of Environment & Forests shall not be responsible in this regard in any manner.

12. A detailed biological study for the study area [core zone and buffer zone (10 km radius of the periphery of the mine lease)] shall be carried out. Details of flora and fauna, duly authenticated, separately for core and buffer zone should be furnished based on field survey. The details regarding flora to include information regarding (a) trees, shrubs, grasses, (b) frequency, density, I V I, abundance % of species occurring on proposed site, (c) dominant species of trees, shrubs , grasses (d) endemic species, (e) threatened species, (f) rare species, (g) endangered species and (h) vulnerable species. The details of fauna to include information regarding list and distribution clearly indicating the Schedule of the fauna present. In case of any scheduled-I fauna found in the study area, the necessary plan for their conservation should be prepared in consultation with State Forest and Wildlife Department and details furnished. Necessary allocation of funds for implementing the same should be made as part of the project cost.

13. Collection of one season (non-monsoon) primary baseline data on ambient air quality, water quality, noise level, soil and flora and fauna, ambient air quality should be determined by

measuring the concentration of parameters like P.M.2.5, P.M.10, SO2, NOx according to the latest standards prescribed by CPCB. Site-specific meteorological data should also be collected. The location of the monitoring stations (minimum 6) should be justified. Date wise collected baseline AAQ data should form part of EIA and EMP report. The monitoring shall be carried out by CPCB/NABL/ MOEF&CC/GoR approved laboratory and copy of the report to be submitted.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

14. Air quality modelling should be carried out for prediction of impact of the project on the air quality of the area. It should also take into account the impact of movement of vehicles for transportation of mineral. The details of the model used and input parameters used for modelling should be provided. The air quality contours may be shown on a location map clearly indicating the location of the site, location of sensitive receptors, if any and the habitation. The wind roses showing pre-dominant wind direction should be indicated on map. Wind Rose Diagram should be representative and include stability class and inversion phenomenon of that area along with the lapse rate.

15. Surface and ground water study should be carried out, both pre-monsoon and post monsoon monitoring. Information about proposed working depth of mining area, groundwater table both in above MSL and Below Ground Level (BGL) should be provided. Based on actual monitored data, it may clearly be shown whether mine working will intersect groundwater table or not. In case the mining activity intersects the ground water table then necessary permission from CGWA should be obtained. Impact of the project on the water quality both surface and groundwater should also be assessed and necessary safeguard measures, if any required should be provided. Further, submit water drainage plan of the 10 km study area.

16. The P.P. should ensure compliance of the order of the Hon’ble Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur, in D. B. Civil writ petition no. 1536 of 2003 in the matter of Abdul Rahman vs State of Rajasthan and others and submit a brief note regarding compliance of the court order.

17. The water requirement for the project, its availability and source to be furnished. A detailed water balance should also be provided. Fresh water requirement (if any) for the project should also be indicated. Necessary clearance from the Competent Authority for drawl of requisite quantity of water for the project should be provided. Details of water conservation measures including rainwater harvesting should be provided and to be adopted in the project.

18. Consumption of diesel and its storage should be provided along with an action plan for its efficient consumption.

19. The Conceptual post mine land use plan and Reclamation & Rehabilitation (R&R) plan of mined out area (with plans and sections at appropriate scale as per MCDR 1988) should be submitted.

20. Impact on local transport and infrastructure due to the project: Projected increase in hauling vehicles as a result of the project in the present road network (including those outside the project area) and whether it is capable of handling the increased load. Arrangement for improving the infrastructure to avoid any congestion especially at junctions and mishaps throughout the route of transportation of mineral should be ensured and action to be taken by other agencies such as State Government, if any, should be covered.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

21. The green belt area should be developed in 33% of total lease area, provide time taken for of progressive greenbelt development, plantation and compensatory afforestation clearly indicating the 33% area to be covered under plantation giving detail of local species, width of plantation, plantation schedule etc. along with year wise financial expenditure. The proposal for completion should be within a period of 3 years from the start of mining operation. Information regarding greenbelt development plan shall also be prepared in a tabular form, indicating the location of the area, type of tree and its number supported by a map. In case plantation is not possible in the mining lease area than proposal for plantation on alternate land of area measuring 33% of the lease area should be ensured after due procreation/ identification of such land with due consent of the land owner. Further, existing mining projects should carryout plantation in 33% of lease area and thereafter come for the EC.

22. Budgetary provision for the labours (registered/unregistered/others) working in the mine should be submitted for all necessary infrastructure facilities such as health facility, sanitation facility, and fuel for cooking, along with provision for safe drinking water, monthly medical camps and distribution of medicines, primary education and toilets for women, crèche for infants.

23. Details regarding occupational health impact of the project should be provided. Health study in the surrounding area be carried out covering information regarding prevailing diseases, mortality rate etc. Health and Safety Plan should be prepared and submitted.

24. The P.P. will carry out proper Socio-economic survey of the villages situated in the study area. The details of survey are given informant ‘J’. Based upon its findings and also as per public hearing issues and keeping in view the felt needs of local population, the P.P. will provide adequate budget for carrying out CER activities including provision for toilets for girls in nearby schools, monthly medical camps, and improvement in educational facilities in the nearby schools. Further, existing mining projects should carryout CER for a period of at least one year and thereafter come for the EC.

25. Measures for socio economic influence on the local community due to proposed project to be provided by project proponent. As far as possible, appropriate quantitative dimension to be given. Analysis of job requirements vis-à-vis employability of local population need to be provided.

26. Detailed environmental management plan (EMP) to mitigate the environmental impacts inter- alia including the impact due to change of land use, due to loss of agricultural land and grazing land, if any, should also be submitted besides other impacts of the project. The budgetary provision (both capital and recurring) for implementing the proposed EMP should be clearly spelt out.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

27. Points to be raised during Public hearing and commitment of the project proponent on the same along with time bound action plan to implement the commitments and the necessary allocation of funds for the same should be provided.

28. Any litigation pending against the project and /or any direction /order passed by any Court of Law against the project, if so, details thereof should be submitted.

29. That the Project Proponent shall clearly spell our details of the explosives and blasting to be used, if any, for carrying on mining activity along with the impact of blasting on the environment and safety major to be proposed.

30. Provide details about transfer/allotment of mining lease, extension of lease period etc. along with authenticated copies of orders for lease allotment / transfer / extension of validity period.

31. A balance sheet certified by Authorized Financial Expert to clearly indicate the provision made / amount spent for EMP/ERP/CER/ Safety/Labour welfare/ Legal Obligations etc to be enclosed.

32. PP should clearly mention in the documents whether there is any violation of provisions of EIA Notification and inform at the start of presentation (to be a part of computer presentation also) as per MoEF Notification dated 8.3.2018.

33. The PP shall submit final and authenticated copy of the DSR (District Survey Report) as contemplated under Appendix-X of the EIA Notification 2006.

34. The Environmental Clearance will not be operational till such time the project proponent complies with all the statutory requirements and judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court dated the 2nd August 2017 in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 114 of 2014 in the matter of Common Cause versus Union of India and Ors. 35. State Government concerned shall ensure that mining operation shall not commence till the entire compensation levied, if any, for illegal mining is paid by the Project Proponent through their respective Department of Mining & Geology in strict compliance of judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court dated 2nd August 2017 in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 114 of 2014 in the matter of Common Cause versus Union of India and Ors. 36. Used filter papers (Air monitoring) along with photographs of the site showing Air / Water sampling / monitoring activity / equipment used at each station should be submitted. Original copies of analysis report of all the relevant data referred in the documents should be enclosed. 37. After preparing the draft EIA (as per the generic structure prescribed in Appendix-III of the EIA Notification, 2006 and as amended from time to time ) covering the above mentioned issues, the proponent shall get the public hearing conducted (strictly following the procedure laid down in the Appendix IV of the Amendment Notification dated 01.12.2009 and MoEF circular no. J-15012/29/2010/IA.II (M) dated 19.04.2010, as per amendment, if any). In this regard due care would be taken in (i) deciding the venue of public hearing (at the project site Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

or in its close proximity, to ensure widest possible public participation), (ii) forwarding the Draft EIA Reports with Executive Summary Reports and notice for hearing to various authorities / offices, specifically to Urban Local Bodies/ Panchayati Raj. Institutions (i.e Zila Parishad, Panchayat Samiti & Gram Panchayat)/ Development Authorities (i.e. U.I.T., J.D.A. etc.), (iii) adequate publicity regarding date, place and time of public hearing among local public, (iv) recording requisite “certificate” at the end of public hearing proceedings / report and (v) displaying the report in the office of Gram Panchayat, Zila Parishad, Collectorate etc. (vi) videography of the complete proceedings of the public hearing to be carried out. After completing the public hearing process as described above, the proponent shall take further necessary action for obtaining environmental clearance in accordance with the procedure prescribed under the EIA Notification, 2006 and subsequent amendments.

38. The information regarding the work order/agreement issued by the P.P. to the consultant (Accredited from QCI/ NABET for proposed project Sector) should be submitted along with, (a) Dispatch No. of the work order/agreement, (b) Date of issue of work order (c) Date of start of air/water/other monitoring work (as applicable) and (d) Postal address/ Email Address/ Fax Number/ Mobile Number and Landline Number of the P.P.

Specific ToR:

1. The PP shall conduct Environmental Impact Assessment Study and prepare Environmental Management Plan for the entire cluster in order to capture all the possible externalities. These reports are required to incorporate carrying capacity of the cluster, transportation and related issues, replenishment and recharge issues, geo- hydrological study of the cluster. 2. The EIA/EMP shall be prepared by the state or state nominated agency or group of PP in the cluster or the PP in the cluster. The PP shall get one public consultation done for the entire cluster and after which prepare final EIA/EMP reports.

Points to be included in TOR as per MoEF&CC circular no. J-11013/41/2006-IA.II(I)-Pt. dt. 19.05.2011 regarding Corporate Environmental Responsibility.

1. Does the company have a well laid down Environment Policy approved by its Board of Directors? If so, it may be detailed in the EIA report. 2. Does the Environment Policy prescribed for standard operating process/procedures to bring into focus any infringement/deviation/violation of the Environmental or forest norms /conditions? If so, it may be detailed in the EIA report. 3. What is the hierarchical system or administrative order of the company to deal with the Environmental issues and for ensuring compliance with the EC conditions? Details of this system may be given.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

4. Does the company have a system of reporting of non-compliances/violations of Environmental norms to the Board of Directors of the company and /or shareholders or stakeholders at large? This reporting mechanism should be detailed in the EIA report.

Specific ToRs applicable, in the cases of violation in terms of the Notification dated 14.3.2017 and 8.3.2018 and OMs dated 30.5.2018, 4.7.2018 of the MoEF&CC :

1. The PP shall undertake assessment of ecological damage, remediation plan and natural and community resource augmentation plan. Such plan shall be prepared as an independent chapter in the Environment Impact Assessment report. The report shall be prepared by the accredited consultant. Collection and analyses of data for assessment of ecological damage, preparation of remediation plan and natural and community resource augmentation plan shall be done by an environmental laboratory duly notified under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 or an environmental Laboratory, accredited by the National Accreditation Board for Testing and Calibration Laboratories or a Laboratory of the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research Institution working in the field of environment. 2. The Environment Management Plan shall comprise remediation plan and natural and community resource augmentation plan corresponding to ecological damage assessed and economic benefit derived due to the violation. 3. The PP shall undertake Final Environment Impact Assessment and prepare Final Environment Management Plan after conducting Public Hearing. 4. The PP shall be required to submit a bank guarantee equivalent to the amount of remediation plan and natural and community resource augmentation plan with the State Pollution Control Board and the PP shall deposit the bank guarantee prior to the grant of Environmental Clearance and which shall be released after successful implementation of the remediation plan and natural and community resource augmentation plan and after recommendation by Regional Office of the Ministry, State Level Expert Appraisal Committee and approval of SEIAA. 5. The project proponent shall give an undertaking by way of affidavit to comply with all the statutory requirements and judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court dated the 2ndAugust 2017 in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 114 of 2014 in the matter of Common Cause versus Union of India and Ors. before grant of ToR/ EC the undertaking inter-alia include commitment of the PP not to repeat any such violation in future. 6. In case of violation of above undertaking, the Environmental Clearance shall be liable to be terminated forthwith as per OM dated 30.5.2018 of the MoEF&CC.

In the final EIA /EMP report , compliance of points of ToRs should be reported point wise in a statement of three columns as indicated below:-

S. No Items in the letter of the ToRs Reply / Response by the PP

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

Annexure’B’

General TOR:

1. The validity period of this ToRs letter would be for a period of three years from the date of dispatch of the ToRs letter.

2. The study area will comprise 10 km zone around the mine lease from lease periphery and the data contained in the EIA with respect to mining operations such as conceptual pit limits, waste generation etc. should be for the life of the mine/lease period.

3. Location of other industries & mines within the study area along with their production and pollutants generated by them, estimated pollution load and cumulative impact on environment including the proposed project should be submitted. The same shall be accounted for while generating mathematical models of pollution dispersion for preparation of the EMP.

4. In the case of existing mine, year-wise production (since inception of the mines) details clearly indicating the proposed highest production for the life of the mine/lease period should be submitted.

5. Details of land to be used as the designated dumping site for OB dump should be selected and proposed within the lease area as per the approved mining plan. In no case the overburden should be dumped outside the lease area, however proposal for utilization of OB for construction or other meaningful use to the extent possible may be submitted and should try to work on zero waste patterns. Details regarding quantity of solid waste generation to be estimated and details for its disposal and dump management are to be provided.

6. Land use plan of the mine lease area should be prepared to encompass pre-operational, operational and post operational phases.

7. The P.P. should provide a mining plan along-with progressive mine closer plan and implementation plan at the time of submission of application for the EC.

8. Based on the study and the points raised by the people during public hearing, the P.P. shall work out an effective plan to address the environmental, socio-economic and other issues identified during the process, with suitable funds allocation for the purpose. Further PP shall implement all commitments made during public hearing, while implementing the project.

9. Certificate regarding mine lease area not falling in the Aravalli Hills issued by the Mining Engineer/ Assistant Mining Engineer in the prescribed format, as per the instructions contained in the letter no. DMG/ADM/Env/EC/F11/06/17-76 dt. 17.01.2011 issued by the Director, Department of Mines and Geology, GoR, Udaipur, should be submitted.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

10. List/details within 10 km radius of the mine lease area, the location of human settlement, water bodies, Reserve Forest, National Parks, Sanctuaries, Biosphere Reserves, Wildlife Corridors, Tiger/Elephant reserves (existing / proposed), shall be clearly indicated giving the land use. Necessary clearance, if any, as may be applicable to such projects due to proximity of the ecologically sensitive areas as mentioned above shall be obtained from the Chief Wildlife Warden under the Wildlife (Protection) Act’ 1972 and submitted. This location map should also indicate the list and location of other mine leases existing, if any, within 10 km radius.

11. The ToR is subject to the specific condition that the PP shall obtain prior clearance from forestry and wild life angle including clearance from Standing Committee of the National Board Wild Life if applicable. It is further categorically stated that grant of EC does not necessary implies that forestry and wild life clearance shall be granted to the project and that their proposals for forestry and wild life clearance will be considered by the respective authorities on their merits and decision taken. The investment made in the project, if any, based on environment clearance so granted, in anticipation of the clearance from forestry and wildlife angle shall be entirely at the cost and risk of the project proponent and Ministry of Environment & Forests shall not be responsible in this regard in any manner.

12. A detailed biological study for the study area [core zone and buffer zone (10 km radius of the periphery of the mine lease)] shall be carried out. Details of flora and fauna, duly authenticated, separately for core and buffer zone should be furnished based on field survey. The details regarding flora to include information regarding (a) trees, shrubs, grasses, (b) frequency, density, I V I, abundance % of species occurring on proposed site, (c) dominant species of trees, shrubs , grasses (d) endemic species, (e) threatened species, (f) rare species, (g) endangered species and (h) vulnerable species. The details of fauna to include information regarding list and distribution clearly indicating the Schedule of the fauna present. In case of any scheduled-I fauna found in the study area, the necessary plan for their conservation should be prepared in consultation with State Forest and Wildlife Department and details furnished. Necessary allocation of funds for implementing the same should be made as part of the project cost.

13. Collection of one season (non-monsoon) primary baseline data on ambient air quality, water quality, noise level, soil and flora and fauna, ambient air quality should be determined by

measuring the concentration of parameters like P.M.2.5, P.M.10, SO2, NOx according to the latest standards prescribed by CPCB. Site-specific meteorological data should also be collected. The location of the monitoring stations (minimum 6) should be justified. Date wise collected baseline AAQ data should form part of EIA and EMP report. The monitoring shall be carried out by CPCB/NABL/ MOEF&CC/GoR approved laboratory and copy of the report to be submitted.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

14. Air quality modelling should be carried out for prediction of impact of the project on the air quality of the area. It should also take into account the impact of movement of vehicles for transportation of mineral. The details of the model used and input parameters used for modelling should be provided. The air quality contours may be shown on a location map clearly indicating the location of the site, location of sensitive receptors, if any and the habitation. The wind roses showing pre-dominant wind direction should be indicated on map. Wind Rose Diagram should be representative and include stability class and inversion phenomenon of that area along with the lapse rate.

15. Surface and ground water study should be carried out, both pre-monsoon and post monsoon monitoring. Information about proposed working depth of mining area, groundwater table both in above MSL and Below Ground Level (BGL) should be provided. Based on actual monitored data, it may clearly be shown whether mine working will intersect groundwater table or not. In case the mining activity intersects the ground water table then necessary permission from CGWA should be obtained. Impact of the project on the water quality both surface and groundwater should also be assessed and necessary safeguard measures, if any required should be provided. Further, submit water drainage plan of the 10 km study area.

16. The P.P. should ensure compliance of the order of the Hon’ble Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur, in D. B. Civil writ petition no. 1536 of 2003 in the matter of Abdul Rahman vs State of Rajasthan and others and submit a brief note regarding compliance of the court order.

17. The water requirement for the project, its availability and source to be furnished. A detailed water balance should also be provided. Fresh water requirement (if any) for the project should also be indicated. Necessary clearance from the Competent Authority for drawl of requisite quantity of water for the project should be provided. Details of water conservation measures including rainwater harvesting should be provided and to be adopted in the project.

18. Consumption of diesel and its storage should be provided along with an action plan for its efficient consumption.

19. The Conceptual post mine land use plan and Reclamation & Rehabilitation (R&R) plan of mined out area (with plans and sections at appropriate scale as per MCDR 1988) should be submitted.

20. Impact on local transport and infrastructure due to the project: Projected increase in hauling vehicles as a result of the project in the present road network (including those outside the project area) and whether it is capable of handling the increased load. Arrangement for improving the infrastructure to avoid any congestion especially at junctions and mishaps throughout the route of transportation of mineral should be ensured and action to be taken by other agencies such as State Government, if any, should be covered.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

21. The green belt area should be developed in 33% of total lease area, provide time taken for of progressive greenbelt development, plantation and compensatory afforestation clearly indicating the 33% area to be covered under plantation giving detail of local species, width of plantation, plantation schedule etc. along with year wise financial expenditure. The proposal for completion should be within a period of 3 years from the start of mining operation. Information regarding greenbelt development plan shall also be prepared in a tabular form, indicating the location of the area, type of tree and its number supported by a map. In case plantation is not possible in the mining lease area than proposal for plantation on alternate land of area measuring 33% of the lease area should be ensured after due procreation/ identification of such land with due consent of the land owner. Further, existing mining projects should carryout plantation in 33% of lease area and thereafter come for the EC.

22. Budgetary provision for the labours (registered/unregistered/others) working in the mine should be submitted for all necessary infrastructure facilities such as health facility, sanitation facility, and fuel for cooking, along with provision for safe drinking water, monthly medical camps and distribution of medicines, primary education and toilets for women, crèche for infants.

23. Details regarding occupational health impact of the project should be provided. Health study in the surrounding area be carried out covering information regarding prevailing diseases, mortality rate etc. Health and Safety Plan should be prepared and submitted.

24. The P.P. will carry out proper Socio-economic survey of the villages situated in the study area. The details of survey are given informat ‘J’. Based upon its findings and also as per public hearing issues and keeping in view the felt needs of local population, the P.P. will provide adequate budget for carrying out CER activities including provision for toilets for girls in nearby schools, monthly medical camps, and improvement in educational facilities in the nearby schools. Further, existing mining projects should carryout CER for a period of at least one year and thereafter come for the EC.

25. Measures for socio economic influence on the local community due to proposed project to be provided by project proponent. As far as possible, appropriate quantitative dimension to be given. Analysis of job requirements vis-à-vis employability of local population need to be provided.

26. Detailed environmental management plan (EMP) to mitigate the environmental impacts inter- alia including the impact due to change of land use, due to loss of agricultural land and grazing land, if any, should also be submitted besides other impacts of the project. The budgetary provision (both capital and recurring) for implementing the proposed EMP should be clearly spelt out.

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

27. Points to be raised during Public hearing and commitment of the project proponent on the same along with time bound action plan to implement the commitments and the necessary allocation of funds for the same should be provided.

28. Any litigation pending against the project and /or any direction /order passed by any Court of Law against the project, if so, details thereof should be submitted.

29. That the Project Proponent shall clearly spell our details of the explosives and blasting to be used, if any, for carrying on mining activity along with the impact of blasting on the environment and safety major to be proposed.

30. Provide details about transfer/allotment of mining lease, extension of lease period etc. along with authenticated copies of orders for lease allotment / transfer / extension of validity period.

31. A balance sheet certified by Authorized Financial Expert to clearly indicate the provision made / amount spent for EMP/ERP/CER/ Safety/Labour welfare/ Legal Obligations etc to be enclosed.

32. PP should clearly mention in the documents whether there is any violation of provisions of EIA Notification and inform at the start of presentation (to be a part of computer presentation also) as per MoEF Notification dated 8.3.2018.

33. The PP shall submit final and authenticated copy of the DSR (District Survey Report) as contemplated under Appendix-X of the EIA Notification 2006.

34. The Environmental Clearance will not be operational till such time the project proponent complies with all the statutory requirements and judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court dated the 2nd August 2017 in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 114 of 2014 in the matter of Common Cause versus Union of India and Ors. 35. State Government concerned shall ensure that mining operation shall not commence till the entire compensation levied, if any, for illegal mining is paid by the Project Proponent through their respective Department of Mining & Geology in strict compliance of judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court dated 2nd August 2017 in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 114 of 2014 in the matter of Common Cause versus Union of India and Ors. 36. Used filter papers (Air monitoring) along with photographs of the site showing Air / Water sampling / monitoring activity / equipment used at each station should be submitted. Original copies of analysis report of all the relevant data referred in the documents should be enclosed. 37. After preparing the draft EIA (as per the generic structure prescribed in Appendix-III of the EIA Notification, 2006 and as amended from time to time ) covering the above mentioned issues, the proponent shall get the public hearing conducted (strictly following the procedure laid down in the Appendix IV of the Amendment Notification dated 01.12.2009 and MoEF circular no. J-15012/29/2010/IA.II (M) dated 19.04.2010, as per amendment, if any). In this regard due care would be taken in (i) deciding the venue of public hearing (at the project site Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

or in its close proximity, to ensure widest possible public participation), (ii) forwarding the Draft EIA Reports with Executive Summary Reports and notice for hearing to various authorities / offices, specifically to Urban Local Bodies/ Panchayati Raj. Institutions (i.e Zila Parishad, Panchayat Samiti & Gram Panchayat)/ Development Authorities (i.e. U.I.T., J.D.A. etc.), (iii) adequate publicity regarding date, place and time of public hearing among local public, (iv) recording requisite “certificate” at the end of public hearing proceedings / report and (v) displaying the report in the office of Gram Panchayat, Zila Parishad, Collectorate etc.(vi) videography of the complete proceedings of the public hearing to be carried out. After completing the public hearing process as described above, the proponent shall take further necessary action for obtaining environmental clearance in accordance with the procedure prescribed under the EIA Notification, 2006 and subsequent amendments.

38. The information regarding the work order/agreement issued by the P.P. to the consultant (Accredited from QCI/ NABET for proposed project Sector) should be submitted along with, (a) Dispatch No. of the work order/agreement, (b) Date of issue of work order (c) Date of start of air/water/other monitoring work (as applicable) and (d) Postal address/ Email Address/ Fax Number/ Mobile Number and Landline Number of the P.P.

Points to be included in TOR as per MoEF&CC circular no. J-11013/41/2006-IA.II(I)-Pt. dt. 19.05.2011 regarding Corporate Environmental Responsibility.

1. Does the company have a well laid down Environment Policy approved by its Board of Directors? If so, it may be detailed in the EIA report. 2. Does the Environment Policy prescribed for standard operating process/procedures to bring into focus any infringement/deviation/violation of the Environmental or forest norms /conditions? If so, it may be detailed in the EIA report. 3. What is the hierarchical system or administrative order of the company to deal with the Environmental issues and for ensuring compliance with the EC conditions? Details of this system may be given. 4. Does the company have a system of reporting of non-compliances/violations of Environmental norms to the Board of Directors of the company and /or shareholders or stakeholders at large? This reporting mechanism should be detailed in the EIA report.

Specific ToRs applicable, in the cases of violation only in terms of the Notification dated 14.3.2017 and 8.3.2018 and OMs dated 30.5.2018, 4.7.2018 of the MoEF&CC :

1. The PP shall undertake assessment of ecological damage, remediation plan and natural and community resource augmentation plan. Such plan shall be prepared as an independent chapter in the Environment Impact Assessment report. The report shall be prepared by the accredited consultant. Collection and analyses of data for assessment of ecological damage, preparation of remediation plan and natural and community resource augmentation plan shall be done by an environmental laboratory duly notified under the Environment (Protection) Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019

Act, 1986 or an environmental Laboratory, accredited by the National Accreditation Board for Testing and Calibration Laboratories or a Laboratory of the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research Institution working in the field of environment. 2. The Environment Management Plan shall comprise remediation plan and natural and community resource augmentation plan corresponding to ecological damage assessed and economic benefit derived due to the violation. 3. The PP shall undertake Final Environment Impact Assessment and prepare Final Environment Management Plan after conducting Public Hearing. 4. The PP shall be required to submit a bank guarantee equivalent to the amount of remediation plan and natural and community resource augmentation plan with the State Pollution Control Board and the PP shall deposit the bank guarantee prior to the grant of Environmental Clearance and which shall be released after successful implementation of the remediation plan and natural and community resource augmentation plan and after recommendation by Regional Office of the Ministry, State Level Expert Appraisal Committee and approval of SEIAA. 5. The project proponent shall give an undertaking by way of affidavit to comply with all the statutory requirements and judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court dated the 2ndAugust 2017 in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 114 of 2014 in the matter of Common Cause versus Union of India and Ors. before grant of ToR/ EC the undertaking inter-alia include commitment of the PP not to repeat any such violation in future. 6. In case of violation of above undertaking, the Environmental Clearance shall be liable to be terminated forthwith as per OM dated 30.5.2018 of the MoEF&CC.

In the final EIA /EMP report , compliance of points of ToRs should be reported point wise in a statement of three columns as indicated below:-

S. No Items in the letter of the ToRs Reply / Response by the PP

Final Minutes of 4.13 meeting of SEAC held on 27th, 28th, 29th and 30th May, 2019