Download This PDF File
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Media and Communication Open Access Journal | ISSN: 2183-2439 Volume 8, Issue 2 (2020) TheThe PoliticsPolitics ofof Privacy:Privacy: CommunicationCommunication andand MediaMedia PerspectivesPerspectives inin PrivacyPrivacy ResearchResearch Editors Johanna E. Möller, Jakub Nowak, Sigrid Kannengießer and Judith E. Möller Media and Communication, 2020, Volume 8, Issue 2 The Politics of Privacy: Communication and Media Perspectives in Privacy Research Published by Cogitatio Press Rua Fialho de Almeida 14, 2º Esq., 1070-129 Lisbon Portugal Academic Editors Johanna E. Möller (Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany) Jakub Nowak (Maria Curie-Sklodowska University, Poland) Sigrid Kannengießer (University of Bremen, Germany) Judith E. Möller (University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands) Available online at: www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication This issue is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY). Articles may be reproduced provided that credit is given to the original and Media and Communication is acknowledged as the original venue of publication. Table of Contents The Politics of Privacy—A Useful Tautology Johanna E. Möller, Jakub Nowak, Sigrid Kannengießer and Judith E. Möller 232–236 Localizing the Politics of Privacy in Communication and Media Research Johanna E. Möller and Leyla Dogruel 237–247 Beyond Moral Coupling: Analysing Politics of Privacy in the Era of Surveillance Heikki Heikkilä 248–257 How Online Privacy Literacy Supports Self-Data Protection and Self-Determination in the Age of Information Philipp K. Masur 258–269 Staying at the Edge of Privacy: Edge Computing and Impersonal Extraction Luke Munn 270–279 Reflections upon the Privacy in the Converged Commercial Radio: A Case Study of Royal Prank Grażyna Stachyra 280–290 The Shorter the Better? Effects of Privacy Policy Length on Online Privacy Decision-Making Yannic Meier, Johanna Schäwel and Nicole C. Krämer 291–301 Polish Privacy Media Discourse: Privacy as Imposed Policies Łukasz Wojtkowski, Barbara Brodzińska-Mirowska and Aleksandra Seklecka 302–313 Data Subjects vs. People’s Data: Competing Discourses of Privacy and Power in Modern Russia Tetyana Lokot 314–322 Media and Communication (ISSN: 2183–2439) 2020, Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages 232–236 DOI: 10.17645/mac.v8i2.3373 Editorial The Politics of Privacy—A Useful Tautology Johanna E. Möller 1,*, Jakub Nowak 2, Sigrid Kannengießer 3 and Judith E. Möller 4 1 Department of Communication, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55128 Mainz, Germany; E-Mail: [email protected] 2 Institute of Social Communication and Media Studies, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, 20-031 Lublin, Poland; E-Mail: [email protected] 3 Center for Media, Communication and Information Research, University of Bremen, 28359 Bremen, Germany; E-Mail: [email protected] 4 Amsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, 1018XE Amsterdam, The Netherlands; E-Mail: [email protected] * Corresponding author Submitted: 17 June 2020 | Published: 23 June 2020 Abstract While communication and media studies tend to define privacy with reference to data security, current processes of datafi- cation and commodification substantially transform ways of how people act in increasingly dense communicative networks. This begs for advancing research on the flow of individual and organizational information considering its relational, con- textual and, in consequence, political dimensions. Privacy, understood as the control over the flow of individual or group information in relation to communicative actions of others, frames the articles assembled in this thematic issue. These contributions focus on theoretical challenges of contemporary communication and media privacy research as well as on structural privacy conditions and people’s mundane communicative practices underlining inherent political aspect. They highlight how particular acts of doing privacy are grounded in citizen agency realized in datafied environments. Overall, this collection of articles unfolds the concept of ‘Politics of Privacy’ in diverse ways, contributing to an emerging body of communication and media research. Keywords agency; datafication; data security; media practices; politics; privacy Issue This editorial is part of the issue “The Politics of Privacy: Communication and Media Perspectives in Privacy Research” edited by Johanna E. Möller (Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany), Jakub Nowak (Maria Curie-Sklodowska University, Poland), Sigrid Kannengießer (University of Bremen, Germany) and Judith E. Möller (University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands). © 2020 by the authors; licensee Cogitatio (Lisbon, Portugal). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribu- tion 4.0 International License (CC BY). In datafied societies privacy practices are under pres- lected, archived and used for analytical and strategic sure. Defining datafication as a meta process which means in often opaque ways. From a critical point of “render[s] into data many aspects of the world that view, datafied communication is based on a political- have never been quantified before” (Cukier & Mayer- economic formation that “relieves top-level actors (cor- Schoenberger, 2013, p. 29), and as a “means to access, porate, institutional and governmental) from the obliga- understand and monitor people’s behavior” (van Dijck, tion to respond” (Dean, 2005, p. 53), while fighting for 2014, p. 189), we perceive changes and challenges dominance over access to useful data. At the level of with respect to the politics of privacy—changes and agents or citizens this implies practical challenges, such challenges which are intertwined. Private data is col- as finding new ways to deal with public visibility and par- Media and Communication, 2020, Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages 232–236 232 ticipation (Birchall, 2016) or developing the ability to re- that privacy embraces manifold online and offline, pub- flect on data flows (Kannengießer, 2019). lic and hidden social practices during which actors create Considering these changes and challenges, it is worth processes or entities that are closed to others. highlighting that privacy is distinct from data security. The articles assembled in this thematic issue con- Both embrace practices aimed at data protection, but tribute to the reinvigorating communication and media data security denotes the safeguarding of private infor- privacy research and prepare the ground for further re- mation from unwanted interference by agents, technolo- search on the often surprising and far-reaching political gies or legislation. This way, data or information would and societal implications of privacy. The contribution of remain secret unless revealed on purpose by data own- media psychologist Philipp K. Masur (2020), for instance, ers and agents in control of these closed doors. The con- illustrates this shift in perspective. Offering a holistic cept of privacy, in contrast, acknowledges that datafied model of critical online privacy literacy, he critically ad- communication is necessarily interrelated and intercon- dresses notions of privacy as freedom from intrusion. nected (boyd, 2012). Privacy refers to the demarcation Academic and data artist Luke Munn (2020) queries the of communication flow boundaries. Privacy is embedded widely shared assumption that decentralized data collec- in society and neatly interwoven with the everyday com- tion is privacy friendly by nature and offers more con- municative action of social and political actors. While trol to individuals. Instead, edge computing apparently data security requires communication and media liter- circumvents data protection and continues centralized acy or adequate data policies, privacy has more profound data collection. Grażyna Stachyra (2020), to mention a political implications since, for instance, communication final example, carefully carves out the political nature of infrastructures determine privacy conditions and, vice contemporary radio practices. While radio has a history versa, so that mundane communicative action can be- of and reputation for safeguarding individual data, in its come a form of politics by consumption (Stolle, Hooghe, current converged form, it may affect the privacies of un- & Micheletti, 2005). intended participants in radio shows around the globe. As such we suggest understanding privacy as the con- Privacy is an interdisciplinary field of research by de- trol over the flow of individual or organizational informa- fault. Historians (Igo, 2018), sociologists (Lyon, 2018) or tion in relation to the action of others. These relations information scientists (Nissenbaum, 2010), just to name are shaped by the media environment, information in- some disciplines, have made substantial contributions frastructure, and societal or cultural rules in which they to advancing understandings of its political nature. But are formed. Understanding privacy as ‘control over’ is what can communication and media scholars contribute an ideal. Absolute control is not possible, which means to this? Communication and media researchers observe in practice that privacy is understood as the attempt to people’s mundane communicative action. They under- exercise control over the flow of individual or organiza- stand how deeply this action is interwoven with its struc- tional information. To pursue privacy is to seek to real- tured surroundings. While datafication and commodifica- ize this control in relation to others—as privacy