DOCSLIB.ORG

Myopia: More Than a Refractive Error − Lasik and Retinal Dystrophies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Myopia: More Than a Refractive Error − Lasik and Retinal Dystrophies MYOPIA: MORE THAN A REFRACTIVE ERROR − LASIK AND RETINAL DYSTROPHIES WALRAEDT S.1*, LEROY B.P.1,2*, KESTELYN P.H.1, DE LAEY J.J.1 SUMMARY SAMENVATTING Three patients who had undergone laser in situ Drie patiënten die een correctie van myopie hadden keratomileusis (LASIK) correction for myopia were ondergaan met laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) first seen because of suboptimal visual acuity (VA) werden onderzocht omwille van postoperatieve sub- and night blindness and/or photophobia. After a com- optimale visus en nachtblindheid en/of fotofobie. Na prehensive examination including psychophysical uitgebreid onderzoek met inbegrip van psychofysi- and electrophysiological tests, two of the three pa- sche en electrofysiologische testen werd een dia- tients were shown to suffer from a progressive cone- gnose van progressieve kegeltjes-staafjesdystrofie ge- rod dystrophy. The third patient had retinitis pig- steld bij twee patiënten. De derde patiënt leed aan mentosa. These cases illustrate the need for in depth retinitis pigmentosa. Deze gevallen illustreren de preoperative evaluation in myopic patients about to noodzaak van een doorgedreven preoperatief onder- undergo LASIK when signs or problems of night blind- zoek bij myope patiënten die LASIK zullen onder- ness and/or photophobia are present. gaan met klachten van nachtblindheid en fotofobie. KEY WORDS RÉSUMÉ Retinal dystrophy, cone-rod dystrophy, Trois patients sont présentés ayant été examinés pour retinitis pigmentosa, photophobia, night une acuité visuelle sous-optimale et une héméralo- blindness, laser in situ keratomileusis, pie et/ou photophobie, après correction d’une myo- preoperative evaluation pie suivant la technique du laser in situ keratomi- leusis (LASIK). Sur base d’une évaluation élaborée, MOTS-CLÉS y inclus des tests psychophysiques et éléctrophysio- logiques, un diagnostic de dystrophie des cônes et Dystrophie rétinienne, dystrophie de type bâtonnets a été établi chez deux patients. Le troisième cônes-bâtonnets, rétinite pigmentaire, patient souffrait d’une rétinite pigmentaire. Ces cas photophobie, héméralopie, laser in situ soulignent la nécessité d’une évaluation préopéra- keratomileusis, évaluation préopératoire toire approfondie de patients myopes qui vont subir du LASIK quand ils présentent des signes ou pro- blèmes d’héméralopie et/ou photophobie. zzzzzz 1 Department of Ophthalmology & 2 Center for Medical Genetics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium * These authors contributed equally to this work received: 28.09.05 accepted: 17.10.05 Bull. Soc. belge Ophtalmol., 298, 31-38, 2005. 31 INTRODUCTION We report three patients who underwent LASIK correction for myopia and were subsequently Laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) is a very examined by us because of suboptimal visual popular and effective surgical technique to cor- acuity and night blindness and/or photopho- rect mild or moderate and even high myo- bia. All three patients underwent a comprehen- pia (20). As for any surgical procedure, sever- sive ophthalmological, psychophysical and elec- al postoperative complications have been de- trophysiological examination. scribed. Although these complications are most- ly related to the cornea (flap, interface, strom- al bed) retinal and optic nerve problems have CASE REPORTS also been described after LASIK (1,27,29,32). Complications related to the cornea include dry Case 1: eye syndrome, flap displacement, flap melt- ing, diffuse lamellar keratitis, infection, epithe- A healthy 48-year-old man was examined in lial ingrowth, keratectasia, corneascleral per- our department because of decreased visual forations and irregular astigmatism acuity, photophobia, monocular diplopia and (4,27,29,30). Reported complications in fun- complaints of seeing halos around the lights, do are peripheral retinal tears, retinal detach- after an uneventful bilateral LASIK. ments, macular haemorrhages, central retinal The preoperative best-corrected visual acuity vein occlusion, macular holes, choroidal neovas- (BCVA) was 7/10 in the right eye and 8/10 in cular membranes and ischemic optic neurop- the left eye. The refractive error prior to sur- athy (1,2,12,14,18,22,23,25,27-29,32). gery was −8,0D(−1,50D)170° in the right eye and −5,25D(−1,75)165° in the left eye. Pre- Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) is the term for a group operative slit lamp examination and intraocu- of inherited disorders of the retina character- lar pressure were unremarkable in both eyes. ized by a progressive loss of photoreceptors (3). Fundoscopy had apparently revealed pigment All types of RP lead to typical fundoscopic chang- alterations in both macular areae. es including outer retinal atrophy and intraret- He received a second LASIK treatment in the inal pigmentary changes more pronounced in right eye because of deterioration of central vi- the retinal periphery, secondary attenuation of sion thought to be related to a myopic refrac- the retinal vasculature and progressive atro- tive regression of 1,25D 1 week after initial phy of the nerve fiber layer leading to a waxy treatment. aspect of the optic nerve head (3). Symptoms We saw the patient for the first time 17 months include early night blindness, progressive loss post LASIK treatment. He was referred to our of the peripheral visual fields and subsequent department because of poor central vision. Day- loss of central vision (3). The age of onset of light vision was satisfactory. RP as well as severity of disease is highly vari- The BCVA in the right eye was 3/10 with able. The condition can be inherited as an au- −0,50D(−0,50D)90° and 6/10 without correc- tosomal dominant, an autosomal recessive or tion in the left eye. an X-linked trait (3). Knowledge of the molec- Slit lamp examination revealed superficial stro- ular background of RP is expanding rapidly (7). mal opacities, more pronounced in the right than the left eye. A slightly superiorly decen- Cone-rod dystrophy is also a clinically and ge- tered ablation in the right eye and a regular ab- netically heterogeneous progressive disorder lation in the left eye were seen on corneal to- first affecting the cones and subsequently also pography. Fundoscopy and conventional fluo- the rods, in which patients characteristically rescein angiography showed macular pigment complain of reduced visual acuity, photopho- alterations apart from myopic choroidosis (Fig- bia and impairment of colour vision (3,7). The ure 1). There was no sign of subretinal choroi- age of onset is variable, but most patients present dal neovascularisation. Goldmann visual field in the first two decades of life. Visual loss slow- (VA) analysis showed mild to moderate loss of ly progresses to a level of counting fingers in central sensitivity and moderate concentric nar- the later stages of the disease. rowing in both eyes. Colour vision examination 32 Figure 1. Composite of fundus pictures, fluorescein angiographies (FA) and Goldmann visual field analysis (GVF); Panels a & b: RE & LE respectively of patient 1, illustrating retinal pigment epithelial alterations in central macular region; Panelsc&d: window defects give clearer view of changes in patient 1 on FA Panelse&f: RE & LE respectively of patient 2, showing only myopic changes with tilted disc and temporal peripapillar chorioretinal atrophic crescent Panelsg&h: macular & nasal midperiphery respectively of patient 3 with evidence of myopic fundus, with bull’s eye aspect in the macular area, small tilted optic disc with myopic conus, albinoid aspect of retina and attenuation of retinal vessels; a few areas of spicular intraretinal hyperpigmentation in nasal periphery Panelsi&j: early phase FA of RE better illustrates bull’s eye maculopathy and atrophic aspect of both posterior pole and periphery Panelsk&lmoderate constriction of visual fields and reduced sensitivity on Goldmann VF analysis, with large peri- central scotoma in RE and incomplete annular scotoma with temporal island in LE respectively revealed a red-green defect in both eyes. ISCEV- seeing halos around lights. The preoperative standard electroretinography showed slightly BCVA was 10/10 in both eyes. The refractive subnormal scotopic responses. Oscillatory po- error before surgery was −2,50D(−2,50D)18° tentials were only residual, whilst combined in the right eye and −5,0D in the left eye. Pre- maximal rod-cone responses showed ampli- operative slit lamp examination and intraocu- tudes of about 3/5 of normal values. Both the lar pressure were unremarkable in both eyes. photopic transient responses as well as the 30Hz Fundoscopy had shown myopic choroidosis. flicker responses were reduced to 1/3 of nor- He underwent his first LASIK treatment in the mal values (Figure 2). Goldmann-Weekers dark left eye. After this first treatment he complained adaptometry thresholds were elevated approxi- of poor night vision. Because of this the LASIK mately 1,25 log units. in the right eye was postponed, but four years These results are compatible with a diagnosis after his first treatment he underwent a first of cone-rod dystrophy. LASIK treatment in the right eye and a redo in the left eye. Case 2: The patient was referred for the first time to our A healthy 48-year-old man was referred be- department 4 1/2 years later after his first LASIK cause of complaints of poor night vision and treatment because of poor central vision, com- 33 Figure 2. ISCEV standard electroretinographies of patients; oscillatory potentials not shown; note differences in scaling; Panel a: ERG of patient 1: slightly subnormal scotopic
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wildlife Ophthalmology
    Wildlife Ophthalmology DR. HEATHER REID TORONTO WILDLIFE CENTRE TORONTO, ON CANADA Why understand eyes? Wildlife need to have excellent vision to survive in the wild Eye related problems are common in wildlife admitted to rehabilitation centers What we will cover Anatomy of the eye Differences between birds and mammals The eye exam Recognizing common problems Prognosis Treatment options When to see the vet Anatomy Around the Eye: Muscles & nerves Skin Eye lids Nictitating eyelid Conjunctiva & sclera Tear glands & ducts Ossicles (birds) Anatomy Front of the Eye: Cornea Iris Pupil Ciliary body Anterior Chamber Aqueous humor Anatomy Back of the Eye: Lens Retina Optic nerve Choroid Pecten (birds) Posterior Chamber Vitreous humor Fundus of the Eye Mammal Eye Bird Eye The Avian Eye - Differences Small eye size in most birds and small pupil size makes it hard to examine Can control the size of their pupil Lower eyelid more developed The nictitating membrane spreads the tears allowing birds to blink less Moves horizontally across eye The Avian Eye - Differences Eyes are not as protected by skull Less muscles around eye so less eye movement Boney ossicles support the eye Three main eye shapes; flat, globose & tubular The Avian Eye - Differences Four different color receptors compared to the three in mammals means better color detail Can see in the ultraviolet range Higher flicker rate – can detect lights that flicker at more than 100 flashes per second (humans detect at 50) The Avian Eye - Differences In some species the eye
    [Show full text]
  • Refractive Error Changes in Cortical, Nuclear and Posterior Subcapsular Cataracts
    1524 Refractive error changes in cortical, nuclear and posterior subcapsular cataracts. D.B. Elliott & K. Pesudovs . Department of Optometry, University of Bradford, Bradford, United Kingdom.. Purpose • To determine the effect of the three main morphological types of age-related cataract on refractive error. Background • The increase in myopia in some patients with age-related nuclear cataract is well known (Brown & Hill, 1987). This change accounts for the “second sight of the elderly” in which the myopic shift provides normal reading ability without the need for spectacles. Distance vision, however, worsens. • Planter (1981) suggested that cortical opacity can induce hyperopic shifts. However, this claim has not been repeated since and no firm evidence is available. • Review papers suggest that cortical opacity can induce astigmatic changes (Brown, 1993). However, these reports were based on clinical impression with no supporting data. • . The prevalence of uncorrected refractive error in the elderly population is high (Wormald et al., 1992). It is likely that a reasonable proportion of these patients have refractive error changes induced by cataract. • It has been suggested that a delay in operating on age-related cataract of 10 years could reduce the number of patients requiring cataract surgery (Kupfer, 1985). The possible role of correcting cataract-induced refractive error to delay the need for surgery should be explored. Subjects • 98 elderly subjects (mean age 67 ± 8 years) were recruited. • 77 subjects had one type of morphological cataract: 34 subjects had cortical cataract, 21 had nuclear cataract and 21 had posterior subcapsular cataract (PSC). • 22 subjects had normal, healthy eyes. • Ocular screening excluded amblyopia, strabismus, eye disease or surgery.
    [Show full text]
  • Faculdade De Medicina Veterinária
    UNIVERSIDADE DE LISBOA Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária OCULAR BRACHYCEPHALIC SYNDROME Joana Veiga Costa CONSTITUIÇÃO DO JÚRI ORIENTADORA Doutora Maria Luísa Mendes Jorge Doutora Esmeralda Sofia da Costa Doutora Esmeralda Sofia da Costa Delgado Delgado Doutora Lisa Alexandra Pereira Mestrinho CO-ORIENTADORA Doutora Andrea Steinmetz 2019 LISBOA ___________________________________________________________________ UNIVERSIDADE DE LISBOA Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária OCULAR BRACHYCEPHALIC SYNDROME Joana Veiga Costa DISSERTAÇÃO DE MESTRADO INTEGRADO EM MEDICINA VETERINÁRIA CONSTITUIÇÃO DO JÚRI ORIENTADORA Doutora Maria Luísa Mendes Jorge Doutora Esmeralda Sofia da Costa Doutora Esmeralda Sofia da Costa Delgado Delgado Doutora Lisa Alexandra Pereira Mestrinho CO-ORIENTADORA Doutora Andrea Steinmetz 2019 LISBOA ___________________________________________________________________ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I express my sincere gratitude towards my amazing parents for always supporting me in the pursue of my dreams. I am also immensely thankful to my sister and grandparents, not only for sharing this road with me, but also my whole life. I gratefully acknowledge and offer a special thanks to Professor Esmeralda Delgado for the valuable contribution, guidance, support and kind words throughout the last year. A big thank you to Dr. Susana Azinheira and Dr. Diogo Azinheira for all that I’ve learned during my stayings in your incredible hospital, and the opportunity to put my knowledge at practice. My warmest thanks to my colleagues Maria, Mariana, Pedro, Francisco, Diogo, Catarina, Cláudia, Inês, Sara and Marta for being by my side all these years and for their friendship. May it last forever. I am grateful to Ivo and Rafael for their guidance during the course, specially in the first year, when everything was completely new to me.
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet: Refractive Errors
    Fact Sheet: Refractive Errors More than 11 million Americans have common vision problems that can be corrected with the use of prescriptive eyewear such as glasses or contact lenses.1 These conditions are known as refractive errors and they occur when the eye doesn’t correctly bend, or ―refract,‖ light as it enters the eye. Common refractive errors include the following: o Nearsightedness (also called myopia)—A condition where objects up close appear clearly, while objects far away appear blurry. With nearsightedness, light comes to focus in front of the retina instead of on the retina. o Farsightedness (also called hyperopia)—A common type of refractive error where distant objects may be seen more clearly than objects that are near. However, people experience farsightedness differently. Some people may not notice any problems with their vision, especially when they are young. For people with significant farsightedness, vision can be blurry for objects at any distance, near or far. o Astigmatism—A condition in which the eye does not focus light evenly onto the retina, the light-sensitive tissue at the back of the eye. This can cause images to appear blurry and stretched out. o Presbyopia—An age-related condition in which the ability to focus up close becomes more difficult. As the eye ages, the lens can no longer change shape enough to allow the eye to focus close objects clearly. Refractive errors are one of the most common—and correctable—causes of visual impairment in the United States. According to a recent study led by the National Eye Institute (NEI), approximately half of all American adults don’t have the 20/20 vision physicians consider optimal due to refractive errors.2 Women experience refractive error more frequently than men: Twenty-six percent more women aged 12 and older have uncorrected visual impairment due to refractive error compared with men aged 12 and older.
    [Show full text]
  • Hyperopia Hyperopia
    Hyperopia Hyperopia hyperopia hyperopia • Farsightedness, or hyperopia, • Farsightedness occurs if your eyeball is too as it is medically termed, is a short or the cornea has too little curvature, so vision condition in which distant objects are usually light entering your eye is not focused correctly. seen clearly, but close ones do • Its effect varies greatly, depending on the not come into proper focus. magnitude of hyperopia, the age of the individual, • Approximately 25% of the the status of the accommodative and general population is hyperopic (a person having hyperopia). convergence system, and the demands placed on the visual system. By Judith Lee and Gretchyn Bailey; reviewed by Dr. Vance Thompson; Flash illustration by Stephen Bagi 1. Cornea is too flap. hyperopia • In theory, hyperopia is the inability to focus and see the close objects clearly, but in practice many young hyperopics can compensate the weakness of their focusing ability by excessive use of the accommodation functions of their eyes. Hyperopia is a refractive error in • But older hyperopics are not as lucky as them. By which parallel rays of light aging, accommodation range diminishes and for 2. Axial is too short. entering the eye reach a focal older hyperopics seeing close objects becomes point behind the plane of the retina, while accommodation an impossible mission. is maintained in a state of relaxation. 1 Amplitude of Accommodation hyperopia Maximum Amplitude= 25-0.4(age) • An emmetropic eye for reading and other near Probable Amplitude= 18.5-.3(age) work, at distance of 16 in (40cm), the required amount of acc.
    [Show full text]
  • Electroretinography 1 Electroretinography
    Electroretinography 1 Electroretinography Electroretinography measures the electrical responses of various cell types in the retina, including the photoreceptors (rods and cones), inner retinal cells (bipolar and amacrine cells), and the ganglion cells. Electrodes are usually placed on the cornea and the skin near the eye, although it is possible to record the ERG from skin electrodes. During a recording, the patient's eyes are exposed to standardized stimuli and the resulting signal is displayed showing the time course of the signal's Maximal response ERG waveform from a dark adapted eye. amplitude (voltage). Signals are very small, and typically are measured in microvolts or nanovolts. The ERG is composed of electrical potentials contributed by different cell types within the retina, and the stimulus conditions (flash or pattern stimulus, whether a background light is present, and the colors of the stimulus and background) can elicit stronger response from certain components. If a flash ERG is performed on a dark-adapted eye, the response is primarily from the rod system and flash ERGs performed on a light adapted eye will reflect the activity of the cone system. To sufficiently bright flashes, the ERG will contain an A patient undergoing an electroretinogram a-wave (initial negative deflection) followed by a b-wave (positive deflection). The leading edge of the a-wave is produced by the photoreceptors, while the remainder of the wave is produced by a mixture of cells including photoreceptors, bipolar, amacrine, and Muller cells or Muller glia.[1] The pattern ERG, evoked by an alternating checkerboard stimulus, primarily reflects activity of retinal ganglion cells.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Modalities for Keratoconus an Overview of Noninterventional and Interventional Treatments
    REFRACTIVE SURGERY FEATURE STORY EXCLUSIVE ONLINE CONTENT AVAILABLE Management Modalities for Keratoconus An overview of noninterventional and interventional treatments. BY MAZEN M. SINJAB, MD, PHD anagement of keratoconus has advanced TAKE-HOME MESSAGE during the past few years, and surgeons can • When evaluating patients with keratoconus, ask now choose among numerous traditional and them to stop using RGP contact lenses at least 2 modern treatments. Traditional modalities weeks before evaluation to achieve correct Msuch as spectacle correction, contact lenses, penetrating measurement of the corneal shape. keratoplasty (PKP), and conductive keratoplasty (CK) • Interventional management modalities include CK, are still effective; however, demand for the last two has PKP, DALK, ICRSs, CXL, phakic IOLs, or some decreased with the advent of modern alternatives, specifi- combination of these treatments. cally intrastromal corneal ring segments (ICRSs) and cor- • Making the right management decision depends neal collagen crosslinking (CXL). Caution should be used on the patient’s corneal transparency and stress when considering these newer treatment modalities, and lines, age, progression, contact lens tolerance, surgeons should be aware of their indications, contraindi- refractive error, UCVA and BCVA, K-max, corneal cations, conditions, and complications before proceeding thickness, and sex. with treatment. Keratoconus treatments can be divided into two cate- Some patients achieve good vision correction and comfort gories, interventional and noninterventional. In this article, with this strategy. particular attention is given to ICRSs and CXL, as they are Advances in lens designs and materials have increased the the most popular emerging interventional management proportion of keratoconus patients who can be fitted with modalities for keratoconus.
    [Show full text]
  • Provider Guide
    Physician-Related Services/ Health Care Professional Services Provider Guide July 1, 2015 Physician-Related Services/Health Care Professional Services About this guide* This publication takes effect July 1, 2015, and supersedes earlier guides to this program. Washington Apple Health means the public health insurance programs for eligible Washington residents. Washington Apple Health is the name used in Washington State for Medicaid, the children's health insurance program (CHIP), and state- only funded health care programs. Washington Apple Health is administered by the Washington State Health Care Authority. What has changed? Subject Change Reason for Change Medical Policy Updates Added updates from the Health Technology Clinical In accordance with WAC Committee (HTCC) 182-501-0055, the agency reviews the recommendations of HTCC and decides whether to adopt the recommendations Bariatric surgeries Removed list of agency-approved COEs and added Clarification link to web page for approved COEs Update to EPA Removed CPT 80102 CPT Code Update 870000050 Added CPT 80302 Maternity and delivery – Added intro paragraph for clarification of when to Clarification Billing with modifiers bill using modifier GB. Also updated column headers for modifiers Immune globulins Replacing deleted codes Q4087, Q4088, Q4091, and Updating deleted codes Q4092 with J1568, J1569, J1572, and J1561 Bilateral cochlear implant EPA 870001365 fixed diagnosis code 398.18 Corrected typo Newborn care The agency pays a collection fee for a newborn Clarification metabolic screening panel. The screening kit is provided free from DOH. Vaccines/Toxoids Add language “Routine vaccines are administered Clarification (Immunizations) according to current Centers for Disease Control (CDC) advisory committee on immunization practices (ACIP) immunization schedule for adults and children in the United States.” Injectable and nasal flu Adding link to Injectable Fee Schedule for coverage Clarification vaccines details * This publication is a billing instruction.
    [Show full text]
  • Cone Contributions to Signals for Accommodation and the Relationship to Refractive Error
    Vision Research 46 (2006) 3079–3089 www.elsevier.com/locate/visres Cone contributions to signals for accommodation and the relationship to refractive error Frances J. Rucker ¤, Philip B. Kruger Schnurmacher Institute for Vision Research, State University of New York, State College of Optometry, 33 West 42nd Street, New York, NY 10036, USA Received 18 February 2005; received in revised form 7 April 2006 Abstract The accommodation response is sensitive to the chromatic properties of the stimulus, a sensitivity presumed to be related to making use of the longitudinal chromatic aberration of the eye to decode the sign of the defocus. Thus, the relative sensitivity to the long- (L) and middle-wavelength (M) cones may inXuence accommodation and may also be related to an individual’s refractive error. Accommodation was measured continuously while subjects viewed a sine wave grating (2.2 c/d) that had diVerent cone contrast ratios. Seven conditions tested loci that form a circle with equal vector length (0.27) at 0, 22.5, 45, 67.5, 90, 120, 145 deg. An eighth condition produced an empty Weld stimulus (CIE (x,y) co-ordinates (0.4554, 0.3835)). Each of the gratings moved at 0.2 Hz sinusoidally between 1.00 D and 3.00 D for 40 s, while the eVects of longitudinal chromatic aberration were neutralized with an achromatizing lens. Both the mean level of accommo- dation and the gain of the accommodative response, to sinusoidal movements of the stimulus, depended on the relative L and M cone sen- sitivity: Individuals more sensitive to L-cone stimulation showed a higher level of accommodation (p D 0.01; F D 12.05; ANOVA) and dynamic gain was higher for gratings with relatively more L-cone contrast.
    [Show full text]
  • Refractive Changes After Scleral Buckling Surgery
    Refractive changes after scleral buckling surgery Alterações refracionais após retinopexia com explante escleral João Jorge Nassaralla Junior1 ABSTRACT Belquiz Rodriguez do Amaral Nassaralla2 Purpose: A prospective study was conducted to compare the refractive changes after three different types of scleral buckling surgery. Methods: A total of 100 eyes of 100 patients were divided into three groups according to the type of performed buckling procedure: Group 1, encircling scleral buckling (42 patients); Group 2, encircling with vitrectomy (30 patients); Group 3, encircling with additional segmental buckling (28 patients). Refractive examinations were performed before and at 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery. Results: Changes in spherical equivalent and axial length were significant in all 3 groups. The amount of induced astigmatism was more significant in Group 3. No statistically significant difference was found in the amount of surgically induced changes between Groups 1 and 2, at any postoperative period. Conclusions: All three types of scleral buckling surgery were found to produce refractive changes. A correlation exists between additional segments and extent of refractive changes. Keywords: Retinal detachment/surgery; Scleral buckling/adverse effects; Refraction/ ocular; Biometry INTRODUCTION During the past several years, our Retina Service and others(1) have continued to use primarily solid implants with encircling bands. Only occa- sionally episcleral silicone rubber sponges are utilized. Changes in refrac- tion are frequent after retinal detachment surgery. The surgical technique used appears to influence these changes. Hyperopia(2) and hyperopic astig- matism may occur presumably by shortening the anteroposterior axis of the globe after scleral resections(1). Scleral buckling procedures employing an encircling band generally are expected to produce an increase in myopia and myopic astigmatism(1,3).
    [Show full text]
  • Refractive Errors a Closer Look
    2011-2012 refractive errors a closer look WHAT ARE REFRACTIVE ERRORS? WHAT ARE THE DIFFERENT TYPES OF REFRACTIVE ERRORS? In order for our eyes to be able to see, light rays must be bent or refracted by the cornea and the lens MYOPIA (NEARSIGHTEDNESS) so they can focus on the retina, the layer of light- sensitive cells lining the back of the eye. A myopic eye is longer than normal or has a cornea that is too steep. As a result, light rays focus in front of The retina receives the picture formed by these light the retina instead of on it. Close objects look clear but rays and sends the image to the brain through the distant objects appear blurred. optic nerve. Myopia is inherited and is often discovered in children A refractive error means that due to its shape, your when they are between ages eight and 12 years old. eye doesn’t refract the light properly, so the image you During the teenage years, when the body grows see is blurred. Although refractive errors are called rapidly, myopia may become worse. Between the eye disorders, they are not diseases. ages of 20 and 40, there is usually little change. If the myopia is mild, it is called low myopia. Severe myopia is known as high myopia. Lens Retina Cornea Lens Retina Cornea Light rays Light is focused onto the retina Light rays Light is focused In a normal eye, the cornea and lens focus light rays on in front of the retina the retina. In myopia, the eye is too long or the cornea is too steep.
    [Show full text]
  • 6269 Variation of the Response to the Optokinetic Drum Among Various Strain
    [Frontiers in Bioscience 13, 6269-6275, May 1, 2008] Variation of the response to the optokinetic drum among various strains of mice Oliver Puk1, Claudia Dalke1, Martin Hrabé de Angelis2, Jochen Graw1 1 GSF-National Research Center for Environment and Health, Institute of Developmental Genetics, D-85764 Neuherberg, Germany, 2GSF-National Research Center for Environment and Health, Institute of Experimental Genetics, D-85764 Neuherberg, Germany TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Abstract 2. Introduction 3. Materials and methods 3.1. Animals 3.2. Vision test protocol 3.3. Statistical analysis 3.4. Funduscopy 3.5. Electroretinography 3.6. Histology 4. Results 4.1. Head-tracking behavior 4.2. Electroretinography, funduscopy and histology of DBA/2 and BALB/c mice 4.3. Linkage analysis of BALB/c 5. Discussion 6. Acknowledgement 7. References 1. ABSTRACT 2. INTRODUCTION The mouse is currently an established The optokinetic drum has become an appropriate mammalian model for studying hereditary disorders, which tool to examine visual properties of mice. We performed have an effect on eye structure and function. In order to baseline measurements using mice of the inbred strains select and characterize mouse mutants suffering from C3H, C57BL/6, BALB/c, JF1, 129 and DBA/2 at the age of ocular defects, a variety of test systems are well 8-15 weeks. Each individual C57BL/6, 129 and JF1 mouse established, like slit lamp analysis for detecting lens was reliably identified as non-affected in vision by opacities, iris and corneal abnormalities (1-3), funduscopy determining head-tracking responses. C3H mice were used for abnormalities of the retinal fundus, reflecting retinal as negative control because of their inherited retinal degeneration, vascular problems and optic disc alterations degeneration; as expected, they did not respond to the (4), or electroretinography for functional disorders of the moving stripe pattern.
    [Show full text]