sign in sign up
<<
Home , Color charge, Gaugino

JHEP03(2003)054 , µ at .pdf but 2003 2003 2) hing date large , brane − 7, mixing a µ 28, noscale limit g D 20% ( hanisms: (AMSB), ch h branc mediation 2) § the stop /jhep032003054 ersymmetric y mec SISSA/ISAS and Mar ebruary 54 b accommo − the F SUSY searc 30 and the among or Sup generate g 200 f ( , can 03 the that and breaking or ep mediation and can MSB jh rb w ˜ g ), s/ theories, ccepted: A 1 mediation er ˜ t A elo Received: prediction oson and dels b pap m the nn SUSY b e/ predict A is scenarios iv correlations mo anomaly string Publishing − ch the h and (SM) ar in µ and the A t/ breaking to Higgs , Phenomenology + .i AMSB, e m del whic 10 ( all kr ssa µ , − Michigan the 8 inspired the mo Physics teracting (GMSB), − 10 ac. SUSY of on find → in × er, 10 of sensitiv b e differences s masses × w is string e http://jhep.si 2 um B tens) arious ersymmetry − mechanisms n v limits or standard µ stop . + h mediation in University strongly ) a Sup few ratio, c µ e − − the Institute and µ and µ (a → qualitativ + and Kor searc + s µ by hing gauge Song of µ − [email protected]. B from messenger l are Physics, , mSUGRA → → r + al eakly s s Breaking, l the direct . branc .k oung w s y B range B the 130-012, ( differ Y . small etic γ there mediation s X a B the or pseudoscalar oul the X and deca an Published a hand, can ysics e Only Se that − The W (mSUGRA), in MSB), l the → → − with that ˜ g l I. y + KIAS w this 2 osing ( Kor l I for + B / KAIST s l B-Ph ersymmetry other vit B and µ s sho X for imp 2) X finds , e bc Run and Sup the → del, GMSB reaking 2003 γ USA − through W ergra → Center Ko Physics, s Baek b g B 305-701, ratio one [email protected] [email protected] Physics, ( Mo On , the After B of sup mediation X ct: γ on on atron on of ≡ s limits In ol ords: 48109, ongryangri-dong, for ev hing X µ h T a → hanisms more. dels. Scho Che E-mail: Michigan E-mail: MI Dep. Daeje → SISSA/ISAS b c c Standard ° Seungw B Keyw branc Pyungw SUSY the mec the scenarios, Abstra angle. B minimal ratio searc no mo JHEP03(2003)054 t 4 3 7 8 8 6 9 1 9 3 29 22 21 12 16 19 26 24 33 soft from arious v on leading hanism gaugino differen breaking violating although t mediation or are mec the ely ] et, CP h y [6 as enden phenomenology SUSY parameters gauge Eac There dep of ], [2 soft qualitativ so. no-scale vily e complete regarded detailed (including b or the mediations hea hanisms. Its and not ears ]. ], duli is are y could mec widely (SUGRA) [1 [4 h e is understanding 20 determine orld parameters (SM) w whic tativ to our sectors past mediations t del (AMSB) Breaking new /mo our mediation µ (MSSM) the a that – mo duli y cedures to (AMSB) ortan 1 er represen 105 t: vit del with v couplings hanging – (GMSB) SUSY o c pro imp gra mo few breaking hanisms tain or dels a ard v momen indicates standard con breaking breaking most mo − fla mec dilaton/mo l trilinear forw h is breaking + the SUSY l Mediated name (mSUGRA) analysis s This It and standard the with y X effect put SUSY string whic to ond SUSY mediation literatures: magnetic vit AMSB → ey and SUSY SM. and b een the B b etc., Gaugino mediated mediation theory the ergra e in dels ], v scenarios. ectra ysics ts − and [5 anomaly M teracting preserving mediated to cesses and µ mo sup ha sp mediating γ in ph ersymmetric + s lagrangians mediated or anomalous µ terms v pro X sup the anomaly t cedures MSB) fla → another brane breaking → ˜ g eakly ], s soft ( an for Constrain duction duction [3 to No-scale Gaugino-assisted Deflected D Heterotic Anomaly W Minimal Gauge Hall-Rattazzi-Sarid B Pro B ts sparticle hanisms the compared on breaking tro suggestions tro in one ten minimal mec y 3.4 3.6 3.5 3.9 3.8 3.3 3.7 3.1 3.2 2.3 2.1 2.2 2.6 2.4 2.5 Conclusions SUSY Relev In In dels oth . . . . 4 3 2 b candidate mediation predicts mo (GMSB) man from The 1. Con 1 SUSY and phases) JHEP03(2003)054 e y ], y k y of → ys ed 8 on on 2), are the the our the a out , this ma ma This egan B − w QCD [7 deca in cesses b CNC) SUSY arious , to y g h ossible reduce Planc Wilson t v e ( µ First e data and p through in est (F sensitiv presence observ breaking hanisms: ts b ables to pro ) turns 2) b or ending this t − theoretical deca t µ whic the parameters l ( uon − for ery mec informations + arious will dilaton/T/M BNL v g m the l dep Therefore amoun v ( s Assuming ts among hanisms. e SUSY erimen t observ SUSY ossible renormalization GUT ortan This reasons. b sign X curren energy the (or hand, p the are erturbativ the particles (partly) Then, hin AMSB) of in ]. mec uon a exp to e → where soft imp fit . can the Therefore m breaking b ecially µ breaking, some [10 high wing for ables. . a of B to out therein. other ys t erties 8 mediation ery on some (non)p esp SUSY effect the neutral already − significan v y can ab the distinguish follo on differences a , is of once w the factory of 10 7 structures. us particles: deca SUSY prop end termediate, SUSY observ addition y e theories to order calculable C it deca no × e the b mediation B amoun (except in or K in On of 2 v data thing in us t cesses, dep of soft giv for indirect as are breaking structures and their the hanging fla of hanisms, SUSY effects c and dels y asymmetry string h pro Secondly energy all few. or will el hange help sign large BNL the reliably B c v or origin of ma mec a mo cesses, qualitativ suc Therefore, at w − ongoing v e y lev FB l breaking definite cesses from fla as b lo SUSY fa errors, trivial + the significan the a pro can l include the resulting ma are understanding s energy ell the indirect pro y the b ¯ y study the and tal – name these non measuring can w X b to SUSY w sa on classes or hanisms. − of derately 2 the to , And these SUSY terms. o effects to lo b regimes to as ts. us arious → in – p can tially) energy v e there energy and mediation − mo Since mec can th with op wn e γ B energy erimen h w e s soft w lo w etc., from timely b for do our theory difference oten wing lo w case. lo X out certain hannels) one , to SM tioned I and erimen in e exp c ortance e energy lo preferred (p − and underestimated I el, − compare the b mixings µ → e e y µ SM the follo a γ is SM + exp and b the lev s from insensitiv + particles the imp from K breaking y informations efore B µ ysics µ turns µ should hanisms. high X Run b mediation and − b the man the ould the e β ph aformen It ond → → − the w K → in hand, than ts, mec MSB cess µ ery s probing qualitativ exclusiv s in ey ties ˜ SUSY g v it cannot corrections structures + tan SUSY B ond B mainly collider b usually erturbations er, B the atron of µ , ositiv and aluable , hanisms pro of p t as if ey in v ev p ev − or − el l in b l This breaking B v other the consider larger T are are errors → w in some erimen satisfactory + and ed distance + mec QCD l ysics the − s e l lev fla v h sign the s Ho oted AMSB, w tal energy − B K B the een the exp ph uncertain l (or mediation X mediators. ysics differen for vide ro w + t the scale. SUSY as l some ductions − whic short at corrections → s l et ph → that ,γ On impro ork, ose. SUSY h same high at pro for 7 y ecoming b new + colliders the trivial X at predicted w l B op b pro erimen b B C urthermore, y s of suc GMSB, , ose F lo able b at e G) ties, mediation the t new X → ed the non affecting purp γ will arious are differen , exp are s this v breaking (R µ e y h B theoretical → X those v trinsically future) tum 2) hiev In Supp Direct , messenger the this cess cesses vided in observ duli suc observ ha γ B some → − ac efficien ailable s e e arious v g v existence X SUGRA, breaking mo the to scales. pro with for b correlations co group to pro B effects, dominated quan uncertain near these thereb all, ( analysis. in SUSY correlations of b to a is within parameters. pro JHEP03(2003)054 e w of in → for the the the ops lo 2 (2.4) (2.3) (2.1) (2.2) scale , h stop, B lo study of SUSY arious − , acuum sign v include o g v γ w s e t searc arious of theoretical prediction, qualitativ w the X data - determined v uon e to arious including Similar ¶ b hargino, → m on v review c the SM are for ], ]. ork, messenger osed hematically y up direct e BNL t B w . h [9 w the largest Sc y i GeV [11 , end ma l SUSY and b , the the ¤ 3 . ref. comp dated our M among whic R dep 100 the ref. QED, Also SUSY µ P 10 in differen up µ and In a − there of space. . effects. in analsyses ]. are in 3 (0) will ¤ β . 10 i R tly ) 4 j [14 section M 5 (0) × F orted accessible , that α tan R particles ( In 22 µ + SUSY source Comparing ref. difference discuss through recen F rep , O study). 16) 10 L not . y β e e de. − umerical in t + P b § section 11 w to n parameter is the tributions ere y considered 10 − foresee , b hargino-sneutrino mo brief. SUSY t (0) w tan ws: in h ables (0) most 2 c i correlations (26 ) L × 10 up con j recen are L − 22 ere R of in orted F µ ( on µ = most × F £ w 14 follo cedures L a the whic the 22 £ + – could qualitativ rep the presen F in µ 2 µ = µν and observ SM µ these as AMSB explained t: 3 e t F a ) a m ectra section pro 1 e w → – tly for with from µν MSSM − b α sp (0) ending All = s and ] i with In σ and Hadronic 597(67) j region) j these calculated B 11 + summarized hanisms find I. l parts, 2) exp µ F I − [13 2 dep β can recen Still, and a i l momen 591 − α come ) ws. 10 2 dominan the are mec een ≡ µ m A and (5 µ b tan g een is × e GMSB SM Run related analysis in a refs. detailed ( , m 116 among b factor follo hanisms, , h − 2 µ = is 1 2 1 ˜ is to t µ 2 SUSY µ ) the SUSY had the m µ the as teractions. + results scattering a γ (see has = m mec ] and a deviation (large µ j M µ whic atron , in in form ] l t in µ a ≡ + 597(67) magnetic β data a ev or [16 mediation π γ χ parameters. the of and hanisms µ − [12 j → → T to l a ysics µ m 48 i 2) as β small tan l s ( space t-ligh + 591 ∆ ( mec ph → correlations gauge B results − µ cesses tributions BNL the = i eff Then tan organized g l ] ligh ( this former L mediation 116 → at con is eak pro breaking and oson breaking [15 s The some = written the w masses b SUSY µ t the and B tribution uon partial − anomalous e a that µ l ork in cesses. m a b an parameter + w that mediation ties. con l SUSY op, s and SUSY SUSY The er pro lo electro Higgs define breaking phenomenology particles the X can parameter, v . − 2001 l SM Muon The This finds co us µ assume + Relev soft the → the l uon mess e s olarization y ear arious W sm Then, The in energy result one p SUSY can SUSY uncertain M Let pseudoscalar 2. on y X 2.1 the collier B differences v breaking b JHEP03(2003)054 t 8 t e ], , is to 7 for the can and SM. C [15 oson ligh (2.8) (2.6) (2.7) (2.5) (2.9) SUSY µ more ysics, b a enden sγ data easy alue ph one the in the effectiv out v W neglected it → t indication e t ties, e the b b for an indep b ond new es rule If o ey particular, prediction on b w ecause will will t mak curren strong relev t b In cesses Similarly it. ould s , SM b w . no uncertain m and dels ). pro ysics fact The for The it only is /m , , R , ]) o to predictions s . ] ph ] mo µ of SUSY w dated R R t m [19 constrain 7 8 ↔ 2) This M tion. y SM up there O O new , − b L R R ere en ( If g 7 8 . v L ( terms tly a µν SUSY theoretical ortional C C for are. These The sev mass G µν e ]). predictions in SM 7(8) + con + a F ). ]. β R uon , , C e and L L b recen R prop [18 α R hange 7 ed 8 space. m [20 b there a 22 12 our to αβ O O giv same . . phenomenology ↔ puts T 0 0 L µν exc L ear. , . effectiv 7 8 in the σ refs. L most 0 0 − − µν errors C ( C indication α L parametrization terms the [ [ but σ ysics ¯ s – app describ on the er ≈ ≈ = = t t b α L ratio h e t the ¯ 4 : s λ SUSY λ Also ph ) ) ) ) manner v ev y b 2 m SUSY µ 2 F F – b t parameter are sg a w W W W W Suc ha √ of √ m 2 compared hange they G G data strong ) and hing e L 0) 4 4 M M M M ho 2 e ] 7 new → π ( ( ( ( a ys ) er exc s − − = b O π (4 olfenstein they L L R R g enden systematic er [17 da SM SM SM SM s 7 8 7 8 as constrain SUSY region. = BNL = (see (4 ositiv W branc to = C C C C m the ) ) a p γ en β on L = and y s that from . 7 sg sγ data t − indep the whenev b as L early erparticles l X suppressed O tak efore 8 the whatev tan 0 + L → limit → in µ b l e 8 O is coming del s → a b is b sup R b ) = O ( ( sense BNL 2 X tribution s from y up B the mo eff eff 7(8) SM large m than use the not Aλ → a the H obtained constrain H O the statistical con implies the (in the − from deca dels B the left-handed is in all in can not een (= and in are mo , R w ys ysics this 7 that tb from the useful setting and/or 10 L R do et and V O smaller a ph − ∗ y b ts to e for where γ wn situations b deca SM 7(8) 7(8) unique scale V s 10 obtained w parameter ysics SUSY C O X × = ectra is vide new kno W with µ ork ph only t are erator a sp R limit → w M e λ these 8 ell pro 16) that op sg w O B deviation § ect new ecially the the our dated erators is → ositiv in Note where where b in and The at p couples op study exp the (26 Therefore, up could for It SUSY 2.2 esp comfortable hamiltonian JHEP03(2003)054 t e of to ys the the a = will dels SM, text vide ysics l (2.10) (2.13) (2.11) (2.12) either In recen alw erators mo ph con pro erators. . for ecause op from ,γ effect tributions hand, op b 7 l the l ¯ most tribution new C w b con , ¯ s , could NLO SUSY in lo , 4 i con to This ) other − l in tributions 0 is P The cal 5 tributions ely l bilinear O and l 10 γ op and − . lo generic 0 µ due con P ] SUSY , ] ) lo the tributions m con × γ l . C µ l 10 5 ork. ) ( 4 ) the [27 γ O w con + l − also of . On ) th ( 10 0 , 18 S extensiv e L : . mass Higgs 10 ) diagrams. es 6 unless b 9 55 C 10( Higgs O b , . . t R predictions µ the +0 this − 0 Here 0 S × diagram O 4 6 b γ sign + − L C − ) 10 L ]. 9 rate. in on ≈ s s GMSB SM The ( 30) receiv + 10 y ( O ) arian × . R the 9 (sys [29 b harged v 0 enguin 2 2 P should y W c harged × y ) ) C the 8) hange p erator c in 2 2 [ 27 . b ) O § ↔ del, π π . The en e e on M considered 0 0 9 ]: 0 P . . SM ( op t tributions, (4 (4 exc L 0 the deca 57 λ C § space. mo giv . 24 § +1 − 2 consider there SM The 10 F 7 3 ] ) , = = cal con + also the . . , (3 √ e C G and lo S – are P this w 4 (5 (6 defined 10 [26 [23 sγ = in ending dilepton (stat hange op. O 5 O een ’s O increasing − = = S lo → ysics b 43 as – for SM ) are 10 . , C ) ) dep exc amplitude. , dels y the GeV b 0 9 h − − ph 6 dim-6 P ,γ cal sγ . ell parameter tributions. 01 e C 7 µ the 1 . § has t to mo the O w the the electromagnetic + 2 + > C λ , → e ts 2 γ − y the µ in con ) 21 F s l when new t in b l as . s thereb SM E ≈ b prediction mSUGRA √ ( nonlo the ) + µ l G X t ] and ) of 2 l l X manner (3 with γ 4 γ SUSY , s ], eff s l for SM 9 S W in ) e ( → [28 SM = X l H → − the /m X C O efficien l [25 M 1 ) through ( efficien ortan , the B ( t ⊃ om the B tributions L ( co → as exp ) → ( the b 10 particles − ) ) co l ro l obtained R SM B terfere del µ 9 on γ B O B b B imp con γ + s ell sl C ( in tributions, , L t effect L y r with ole w 9 sl mo is s X are s efficien with ( destructiv ( negligible → B O violations little con t Wilson SUSY as can 2 2 co b → dip → ysics ely ) ) ( deca or ys t 2 2 or b π π a B e e e ph v eff op latter ery e ( the SM (4 (4 and v r erators H lo constrain to fla doublet alw ] erators B is ortan t the = = op ] new Wilson propagator the SM, is op agreemen [29 9 S 22 magnetic of destructiv inclusiv γ imp O Higgs d O to , s the Higgs o ortan the fact, the there are X [21 minimal o constructiv go up primed µ In In The The also photon w tributions imp dify a us, t → in terfere harged hargino-stop where The c presence add mo are the con c is and data Th in with of an in B JHEP03(2003)054 γ e ). it 7 b w the the the the the can this O cor- hing m Also ratio ratio large ( if (2.14) (2.15) of γ ]. 7 er, and data, and One tly [7 studying the although tribution C ev branc QCD hing mediation states, theoretical olving t. ys ords, w of v frame con w one des precision, mass the in ork. these Ho effect deca w branc ortan mo large sufficien sign rest of SUSY t ostp B y high other p predictions. 75] or Therefore . Then the breaking e quark imp the F hange e 0 hargino the Sarid . . In c from termediate . w view deca SM − 10 in presen with exc in SM — 7 O that e SM and 7 er In the C 47 quite tributions. . C ottom the SUSY γ ev case. the e − exclusiv s suffer [0 b ]. ely . w b and con to ) ≈ ) X . in , the cess, 6 lik 75] 9 SM [31 ) photon Ho 6 . Defining the 0] 4] − b measure exclusiv 0 . . − → O with Rattazzi to nonholomorphic 3 2 arious pro SM ∆ 10 could MeV ery to ) − v 10 the wn B MSSM to MSSM Higgs 7 γ v — een − − ) + − distributions s of × e C the w − 4 47 9 op µ ysics. sign in of is . . . 100 kno ) virtual X consider (1 µ e harmed + et lo compared is [1 [0 [0 c v ph than erators + related 13 14 µ it − b Hall . . β s → µ 0 ha the units s op not resonance. difficult osite − ratio 6 6 6 orly /ψ X harged – energy B c J o cesses cos sensitiv and X − − − ties new 40+0 32 to 6 limit . . p alue, → (in 0 m /ψ e g are larger opp 10 10 10 W will v ( – for → hargino of β J +0 − b from pro hing the c B t t relation M × × × ys e ( ≤ enhanced are ets B 99 so-called 2 the . to of ( 0 6 6 k tan B — and . . . the ossible √ dilepton tially µµ 5 (0 0 3 B and tly ]: b p deca branc the uncertain w prob y m wing has of harmonia curren < = < = brac e ≡ is efficien c four e [30 egan stop ject, class elo = ≤ ) ) ) ) large SM factors it b the co b µµ b − − − − tributions follo µ l the the e ]: cal 7 ), µ µ pro R substan the − ts m + m the + l Y [8 + + this C lo l the from e con large 2 in e effect S significan + the µ µ inclusiv b ∗ with b form l sensitiv hadronic K ∗ in U y e s than couplings, K S µ K the a the cal as b are K wn necessarily X a → b ¯ asymmetry the future with erimen e the will the 7 → in → b → − B sho → C − ( effect B b l consider B exp ely ard the than couplings, nonlo ( B larger oid ( t B large B + ( errors t tributions effects t v l − that can should B coupling B y e kw s a is to correlated B for that h ecause the for − a X con tal µ l b , with to Although w bac ortan a + and ortan a l these . → the factory s able t in meson uk implies ties destructiv imply imp ard predictions X A B inclusiv ely timely B to imp Y erimen region, B order strongly region → (namely t for distance not is SM forw observ Hall-Rattazzi-Sarid This In ectiv exp hanisms. β B large this the quite es more terfere µµ ottom this paren The for Another R in is summarize resp b rections ongoing 2.3 In ratio The mec uncertain tan the do in is deviation consider long for JHEP03(2003)054 . . . ] , 6 ˜ ˜ g g is × − β to . − for 35 wn the the µ The y M ,   2) with 10 + Hall- . 2 µM do . (2.17) tan (2.16) ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ 1 ˜ t µ due ending ) × e [34 for y θ ell has, and function deca 6 § 0 10 ] . w the − → ), l 2 7 dep C . s large + op [42 one as to l ositiv < − (3 limit, this s , B angle lo p . β (2.11 parameter for X 10 ¤ to ) β a sensitivit ) . due t C µ for refs. 2 ) t ( large SM: , the → cess tan 2 2 set s tan and ˜ t e /a µ en direction 2 µ B B mass 2 mixing b ) , is pro c M the m also ev 2 ˜ M ( I 2 t and , ratio R prefers amoun 1 ˜ t 2 large ˜ t , in oth m large can γ t log , + b (2.10 P − s either M 1 b or 2 ˜ ) ) (See 2 t ( gluino Run C L )] s X a F hing single ˜ ) t 0 I P ∆ 2 in 2 the pronounced m b c a m β c ( C eqs. ]. small dels, → ’s. the f − in analogous − + + /m 41 in C ˜ t s B atron 2 b branc less tan ) P large mo significan , θ ery 2 a × result m µ C 2 v m ev ts and en 2 t a the ( ( ( )( s 40 /c 2 µ T the ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ 2 hieving 2 2 the the is A B − y , c sin giv b m the + b correction ac ( t for 4 − M π 2 39 SUSY − = ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ α 4 µ ecomes ¶ and at 2 , enhanced ) efficien log op − ) b + that b µ In 0 dify 0 P – S s ) + 2 t during 2 1 µ lo A co 38 t 1 . c )( ] C C ) ˜ t 7 m whereas 1 2 2 tly m , ˜ g mo s parameter M already b b µ aims − → m – − + 2 [33 ( 0, 2 36 M | b W µ Note s is + − m t S fb similarly enhanced , CDF y and y b , 2 ) m λ 2 B > M C b 2 SUSY − e b | b ˜ ( 2 ( l a m Wilson S 33 b the CDF y µ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ stop s + [( M of /b and C en µ further l , en 2 , 2 B I, t ) from ! the significan of 1 y I b f a up the b s ˜ 2 µ can enhancemen ( giv → [10 e deca giv ¶ 2 B 5 can ligh B M b s m /m in ks is therein.) ( is W 4 us log s M sign β B limit Run ), I M θ the ) 2 the limit, hange, y 3 3 pic m th c β A 2 − B b refs. ( can er π 2 τ ded 1 β 0, for b, the m 2 effect a exc 2) ] luminosit for sin ( tan à 64 £ in α = tan deca a, and atron 4 >   − 37 upp ( 2 F on tan µ enco , 0 = S I µ ˜ ev g t g , µ G × β ( ) C T violations oson oson Sarid ratio this c 6 M ' b t [36 b are , = or found b, s S S large A — F ) π tegrated uon for − tan α e ] CP C ending C tegral 3 a, curren effect. − − 2 µ hing in b m ( ). − µ µ hamiltonian in to + I the [32 µ Higgs + ' + for dep µ e effects an = µ µ ratio b The the in op can branc ∆ → lo ]. P for ) C.L. Rattazzi → → sign( z sign, C d 8 s s , hing that % [10 pseudoscalar − — SUSY B ortional effectiv y B the B The neutral 9 t ( the 10 95 − x, B ( Hall prop ligh on discussions and branc Rattazzi-Sarid to either Here, where Therefore Note f The 2.4 and at example, 10 The the JHEP03(2003)054 e µ w to ere the the hes out out soft e giv 80% LSP elo w . Higgs afore- (2.20) (2.18) (2.19) b ab is − ,γ trade are and 7 but the branc on turns the C h indication t to relativ prediction. o 70% from It of w vitino data ything t that of flip cosmology SM (whic an limits using space. gra el sign serious h BNL that the constrain lev ounded a the masses. b a (REWSB) to oth cannot ose assume Then, the as searc assume the b , un Higgses , as γ t. s en o imp at of it not een parameter close X not where the w e nonstandard w GeV t − , tak GeV , particle l , suggested direct w of et do do 2 use → or Z + breaking e in β l b e for b 300 2 e s M 300 B w the ecause w and , GeV 1 2 ]: constrain X not < b > sin remains SUSY , ˜ a not ν region aded scenario , for − 43 ¢ ˜ ν [14 → ose but do 2 − β m ev l minima β GeV m as ,γ on µ e e masses B 7 + , 2 e 2 mSUGRA can l GeV w imp deviation symmetry b s e tan C , vitinos, ossible, relations: + 190 71 1 of e for p tan X – 10 for certain u 2), of ositiv GMSB ratio 100 w − u gra − the eak 2 H 8 can ounds p a , , 2 H as → − scenario) t β . , , > b w e large 10 – m wing observ breaking text 2 ts g t m running in 85 85 the for b B sign ( hing × + GeV ligh tal − GeV to for to con d tan space, 6 follo , , GeV GeV GeV d . for for 2 H GMSB NLSP ) the alue electro 16) uon 2 H enden ery GMSB γ harge 95 103 95 45 83 36 45 v m m branc s v e m strong the m the § ¡ t fixed > > > > > > > erimen γ X hance constrain ratio s the ys c that in corrected = = is ˜ ˜ g ν a the , (26 indep X b, ˜ 2 ˜ τ → µ exp color-c µ (except quite ˜ t, no for using µ op ˜ SM. µ, 0 + or curren alw B , parameter hing find → radiativ these AMSB χ AMSB χ of ˜ m B e is F del lo is β ( + + 0 the e study is m m r m B mSUGRA χ mSUGRA χ mSUGRA χ the the w mo other the B tan are sign m m m SM. branc ose since neutral ound the SUSY there (except u ts, as LSP ond b ], for prediction, 2 H e since and than the the er The imp ey m b ose v ts the b previous Z e o assume it, to SM ]–[45 harge w mass to M e and c imp er and w the for [43 ossible constrain particles v e do ysics scan d p o Therefore w ts stronger stau 2 H cedures and with e dated e ph all, GMSB, case, order b w m nor that is breaking). µ up of Constrain ed.) the h SUSY B Pro In Also the tioned SM new w color ould or SUSY where 2.5 When and F is that whic LSP), constrain men the (Note allo w predictions most enhanced for First 2.6 and JHEP03(2003)054 t e e e e a γ y ). in of v s b b w tal the the CP will ter- e and dels . X m This ha b tially ( turns space made in Higgs deca and where of γ tly masses ). mo erfields → 7 to signs ould it ticipate γ differen sensitiv duce umerical Φ, SUGRA, C w s tially mediated will B the n an essen jects: sup X theory scale eakly It γ of e newly pro is are s fundamen en ob and w harged source w order SUSY either the is → c essen X M γ h fermion parameters, giv e SM significan 7 hand, ector parameter will erfields In in B is v in So alue phenomenon consider, v C a ( minimal → v more gaugino the new three scale e ha − − whic 10 ). l ation sup the B w of y Br − for − + and problem. ≈ no other b scalar l This messenger y µ s can 10 in γ scenario), scale. + braking 7 is heterotic running that X cancel hiral µ y × CP the C mitigated c observ angle, hiral alues deca absolute Also one hanisms: G c theory v vit large → is ere → , breaking, of ecified R On can o messenger of β a scenarios (10) s there this mixing. B SUSY with sp mec w the complications sev The t O t e B SUSY field ergra ( deviation v o us tan + e e mixing for messenger B Then and to tial ha soft SUSY matrix. stop oid large ∼ Th sup tak mediations, problem v function is wledge. a to µ large function for the differen large tribution stop the the a ratio or a mediation effectiv can to v constrain scale. kno scenario. mediation duli . e ork. for oson completely con substan and for − mixing ). fla the w – the ecomes b l ely with scalar mo est hing b no-scale + 9 will crucial mediated op particular, l b 3.2 are order s − – lo l energy is observ and with this in hand, hanisms real ectiv AMSB date X the + and CKM in breaking Higgs l SUSY w our determine predictions holomorphic a it branc breaking to s data in lo → hanisms messenger a h e to ): the X resp scenario mec a the section the † mass the real the B do other e expressions anomaly theories, V mec → The the hargino hop in b for SUSY , whic on c (Φ): in e SUSY dilaton to includes for scenario, are time . V y accommo (see the B M at mixing, ab that , stop µ (mSUGRA) h giv f ∗ sector, assumption the predicted the GMSB R to ma e or little eral for Φ so ˜ t y On e aim ound first phase with , h in ratio indices. the w is b except fields − sev the this vit (whic the (Φ breaking, L er , er, the not mediation mediation since ositiv SUGRA on ratio ˜ t visible KM K whic dels parameter β w p in cases, hing differences ork, ev t 0, there lo parameter parameters erstring functions group do for w y w problem e When mo relax A ergra t tial the tan the review MSB) hing > e the ends SUSY large ˜ g Ho e seen sup no w to prediction. the ( branc ork in µ man this w the sup messenger mass w oten minimal for h is ond breaking dep as gauge dels. theories, V p all in t kinetic branc curren and in small for SM the ard ey breaking h y − the erstring and ratio. b the a e Therefore mo µ qualitativ are whic clearly vit and the the suc + of the b that ahler ersal stop i squark There that µ sup SUSY for section, h mediated tforw for breaking presen v are Gauge K¨ Φ a, shap er as t hing . mass so Minimal b ergra that un → brane β ter d consider • • tributions SUSY most the this the γ whic o true ligh − s 7 e e um tan go b w assume con acting D a same straigh n Then, are analysis, 3.1 Sup ligh stop 3. theories there SUSY violations In C gauge out branc to B in in excluded. is JHEP03(2003)054 , j t 2 y If ). µ er on op b X for are . the our one and w ∗ 2) j 0 lo 2.5 (3.1) (3.2) case, short fields exact plane lo y harge gauge X 0 GeV’s in m − b reduce enden Earlier ) j masses. figure general. trilinear SUGRA g β < limits the the ( this jects, to P the 122 mitigated. in with h these y , the ob section + tan b indep (in In scenarios color/c and 0 of , i ecified corrections masses uon hanges t tly 2 as e 120 SUSY µ A t c 10 / Φ e , order b searc m sp 1 a gaugino assumptions ∗ i − (see inspired e three Φ hargino-stop mass e M denote is in mass 10 c tributions. i 115 ( scale. v e the same enden of P = constan ha excluded . ecific del signifian con direct (w ork ) should the h radiativ the e string on these e is renormalized sp the e w y coupling µ = b erfield. ( scalar m GUT w mo b b op e unit in indep gaugino qualitativ couplings, the mediation b , duli the lo to K to at LSP rom sup µ e in ersal is this since sign the F es) b these can in tially mo found e region will in ersal from in the e y tial, or univ onds , ere trilinear b hiral Higgs SUSY µ curv y c , excluded essen ated tial a trilinear gra breaking could univ sev eV mSUGRA , β assumed oten is t of that is T negativ function can p for fields endence. is problem 60 ersal 1 oten solid unification − non a Although satisfy corresp tan the ersalit p motiv ligh µ ≤ harged ≤ . protected or there more of e c + SUSY dep 2 – or v 2 (Φ) univ the masses, β / assumption b µ / region plots ahler F 1 h univ the ranges: 1 in sector assume are fla kinetic W , tours K¨ 10 function ahler the tions, uc and M → this (in tan M 0 CL. get – can 0. K¨ scenarios gaugino study s m ) A tour and con role dark (Φ) not e tial ≤ ≤ % wing the B − t > and w her, µ 5 W simple the parameters the con the gauge mass . SUSY dels hidden example. sfermion assum 95 + left µ did 1 for t oten a ric for follo , µ unification GeV e SM mo at 2 for e and for soft the (Σ), the the ecomes / w to masses, erp b that 1 → 50 γ b The ], and the suppressed these s holomorphic dominan as mSUGRA s the on form M t (Φ) e result the whereas so dot-dashed sup X gaugino 0. er a [26 a B h constan can w ab that that v ( oson of dulis , relegating leads f o = b → ys gaugino end GeV − suc l the with The 0 The the it , mo Br Under condition + B ersal (Φ): scale mSUGRA pla A . 0 fields, l simple in dep 300 w s the γ or W ely m constrain s of except y a the X Higgs theorem, ose the = univ terms sho X and analysis although γ ], eep s ma GUT e Assuming functions 0 → set tial k sector → imp and w and X dilaton [10 the m fields parameters . e Σ), B soft parameters, question, , reference. relax a parameters: y B GeV 1 the w oten y couplings al. 0, → of did es) e of phenomenology b assumes has publication. the a and at constructiv the erp fiv 300 er et = also B e these w hidden But γ b ely but a curv out couplings future where s hidden 0 = j one restricted figure one on particles Sup 0 A c uk X X a um can the ortionalit holomorphic energy In If deriv wing future Y scan n the the m • ho dels the Dedes → e terferes w ound also neutral for W of with follo b dashed SUSY the phenomenological in for the B lo results. The collectiv nonrenormalization One All can couplings with mo the prop Also ad of group, JHEP03(2003)054 ). < → 30 for the − ted µ ≤ B colors ( + del (blue) β r t particle SUSY µ and µ colors). B a t mo tan → es) < represen (b) ≤ s SUSY 10 ratio. Differen B squares dots). 20 curv ( − are and k differen B 10 and SUGRA ), hing 10 the × − − µ (blac regions (blue), and (also 10 dashed 26 + β Higgs branc µ , 20 es × The 800 γ 10 minimal ≤ s tan → the − SUSY µ (green), 58 short s X β a ≤ y (GeV) shap 10 B the b > ( t → 1/2 GeV. 700 50 tan × -9 the B in m 122GeV uon B ≤ 26 300 y m (in and 3x10 SUSY µ b and 10 -9 triangles = < -8 600 a 10 differen 0 plane excluded the − ) w), m 5x10 star) the 1x10 is β 10 SUSY µ and 120GeV k SUSY µ 500 a ello een with , -8 a – and of 10 tan excluded w (y 10 ’s 26 , 0 < 2 − 11 -7 et (blac is uon (red), region 5x10 / 10 = b 1 10 400 – m unit 10 0 50 ≤ − m SUSY µ 5x10 42 ( A × in a β ≤ 10 58 the t region in β (dark) 115GeV 58 300 × tan with y) (a) triangles < es) SUSY µ tan wn 10 ≤ a , gra del 3 ≤ correlation een bro 200 t : 10 differen curv w for β mo − 40 t erted SUSY µ et v the a 10 b (ligh The tan in

100

solid

w × <

60 50 40 30 20 10 tan plots 0. β of (red), 10 10 = the sho the green represen 40 − 0 e mSUGRA < tour e A ≤ 10 k), w (in the w ranges , β con the ) t × correlations a − and 2 SUSY µ in µ and (blac tan a 42 + The , µµ The ≤ µ GeV R 10 differen enience, 1: 30 2: − t → v figure stars ounds, 300 s 10 and b regions In B con ) = the ( × γ 0 s or y (green), Figure Figure 42 b represen F X Br The mass m JHEP03(2003)054 t 7 y w µµ In − ell, the the the out the and The R hing w (3.3) ratio 10 large sho 1998. could space deca 8 in sector in dated. for e × − curren as use − γ of manner. consider w 2 than up 7 y 10 turns µ compared terference hing branc , e messenger e mSUGRA to diminishes C + b as parameters to tit there group. w in The 2 µ % ecomes stops are tribution. e of hidden b the t. up mess than SUSY µ larger breaking branc 13 → soft β a quan con parameter effect that N of h and s ossible − smaller the gauge to t ailable sign figure , p µ B uc v on limits of a I. destructiv tan a a I the e + m in scenarios larger In up SUSY a C h b µ SM the as ws destructiv noted constrain the is e 2 region in t. enhanced out breaking b data → γ ´ h Run teresting hargino not s ws e as β the allo c a searc s π limits other in b w X 4 α t B hing some induce of gro h rule ³ hargino-stop whic tan teractions it enhancemen BNL an c ould is for breaking → efficien , SUSY atron enhanced can ligh in a w cannot ], , is will region 10 particular direct X e B co searc ev of searc a it through − the π b this tributions T new where β γ for [26 true µµ y large tation 4 α In 7 ts) there ¶ b 10 ratio X set R the . ose) SUSY C ratio con particles I gauge c i ¶ tan can the ties, and × the I tributions : also and 2 ,γ mess Λ Ψ direct onen SUSY hand, 7 i If and imp at µµ the hing region group is 2 wing M 30) C mess Λ – con SM Ψ ) hing more. when mess R y represen erfield Higgs large γ Run − µ the of M − X SUSY s not although i e 12 M the comp f no follo µ C.L.), other (GMSB) λ ≈ X sup branc This – deca 2 (GMSB), KEK the uncertain The g true F (20 branc In (do ,γ = sign tributions Λ − % → y 7 smaller. osing the Λ case, atron the . but µ − other scale b harged through 8 C the this µ + W c , B ev ose con ectorlik del. that − mess the ( (95 e µ + β v e T imp mess singlet SM On . v N effects. µ longer 10 6 and mo hargino-stop around 0 2 N the and Br imp → c − of ha induce tan breaking breaking × the note ecomes s the e sector → is no = = = Higgs theoretical h 10 b 2 ties. w B to s observ the analyses ) ) ) in and the as gauge oson ) is × if messenger B ∼ y b turn e a , scalar Also reac to large 6 able and lie . SUSY µ determine mess mess mess β een The SUSY . SM of in 2 a SUSY to correlation the h SUSY µ this mSUGRA w the same M M M tal harged mSUGRA the for h to a the el ( ( ( c et ecause tan a k w the ), at Higgs ,γ 2 ij w). uncertain the b b in SUSY 7 observ ossibilit hance ij the lev the this whic , 10 c M , the m p C No whic CDF: 7 A e , − γ on is and ello tal (and couple c i − s − oth erimen large in useful no the with for the (y 10 Ψ within β X mediated the 10 sector ≈ (b e , e del 0). comprehensiv h i prob SM e × for to mediated b b exp to from ,γ → b to prediction Ψ ) X > limits tan fields 7 sector, mo erimen 7 ( 15 C B the correlation than − ork. µ of wn terfere circles can er as branc gauge ould h w SM due . will exp limit e in MSSM w 10 do ( w ev it o for lo een v × correlation the it Gauge The as previous w kly er erfields 6 t the w de del the indirectly this the whic w mediated larger ositiv et e ∼ ( mo mo and aimed is upp small quic there this mSUGRA since to It the p b b The in and Considering ratio to is In sup The in 3.2 messenger messenger in JHEP03(2003)054 , 1 e ’s is − Br i a w for the are = g Λ C ( (3.4) since 1 ) , the x GMSB and Y ( mess ≈ Also the 2 g messenger N uon ) and the M x parameters m ( U(1) are and g ound, and es) in ¿ × with b ) diagrams, the ≈ SU(5). − L x Λ these ( µ curv ) del osons. f op as + x scale, on b mass GMSB ( µ mo h f , limit SU(2) scan o-lo in ) and → . w suc µ stau e × dashed t s Higgs 400 found c t w the one: B of GMSB e GeV (GeV) In sign( b ligh of 1 to short messenger fields, from and 15 group M 350 the ]. SU(3) , , 122GeV the 10 1 -9 [3 the can in the β parameters masses of y M arise b -9 is GUT 300 (in ref. tan h the , 2.5x10 free ximated a 10 plane M 5x10 . -8 in discussion − on ) and i to i β whic 250 10 the 10 – GeV X , scenarios 120GeV 1x10 X k appro 5 couplings excluded F h -8 The of Λ MSSM h ij tan 13 parameter , found , 10 is ounds time. A 1 ell ]. 200 – harge b erfields, ≈ e 2x10 c × w M the unit b 26 ( Λ 5 er [27 2 , gauge for Y GMSB sup GeV first w mass , in 115GeV of Therefore 6 ≤ are region 150 lo − , 42 the can of l t ) mess y SM 10 1 Λ the + U(1) x l in N the ( bino SUSY µ s = = ≤ gra results f a y 100 for the arian X t form es) b the v factors. the for in , mess mess messenger → ligh are ork and analysis GeV curv 50

N op

4

w M

) for B of 60 50 40 30 20 10 tan β 1) lo x mess 10 , plots ( The anishing Λ explicit er 2 y g v excluded M solid , this . b b and 3 is Casimir ranges: tour in normalized γ non um the = s GeV n scale: trade e 6 whose con a X v en e (in the 10 wing region ha w ) the giv → functions − The e = is is µ B suppressed follo (with W quadratic + op phenomenological 3: ], a µ breaking N (dark) mess lo α ignored 1. are functions the M [46 the → e practice, wn s v er ¿ µ op v B Earlier scenarios 2) Here are lo bro o these In Figure ( x and ha where they SUSY JHEP03(2003)054 - t 1 I, at er I ). 60, the the the the not SM = w b also runs hing SUSY µ 4 mass large e ∼ lo in a in GMSB ecome is G smaller Higgs β Run b the to mess ) decrease fermions ould R alik excluded and the − stop N branc the the constrain ys w µ to tan a is a y ok if 4 it + . the b (This in parameter the 2 lo atron µ Therefore, alw t ensate effects harged I. with scalar c ev I leading discussed A large is and strong tends T → G 5, SUSY µ region Also scale, as − a resulting R figure s figures the comp ery µµ µ no Run to v B the + as R excluded ( features Therefore GMSB is (b) to the 1 µ mess masses. larger, dark the B at and is (See for I. I M resulting 8 → the − mixing. same atron and ed − erall left s Still scenario w µ prediction, v there from egins and , R ev B + o lo 10 ˜ t scale, b ). The Run the T µµ µ ecomes region 6 that × a gaugino s − excluded. SM The R b 2 for and y L observ X e are ˜ t The . or SUSY µ the as b t, and noscale F a (a) is GUT the . gra atron → large. 5 hargino-stop γ at assert scale ratio increases c t. s − ev GeV B unified tribution µ T the and 6 the ould X the large ery ortan with + legends from v w the eak 10 µ ) – ered for con mess as hing → as the for v γ safely w negligible figures from imp e and s N = The → 14 not B b oth X at to . significan s – b case can scales disco (see branc to high scenario B that → are mess plots can electro fields mass, is GeV able deviation y signals M as B one 6 mess the t ( quite case − not r and N 10 leading the µ tour So is B deca oson hargino-stop AMSB + en, and effects = c er b at are h µ Therefore con SUSY 1 w messenger 50. tributions tok the its γ the ecomes unobserv lo small, s mess → small, = the b w . messenger whic significan of the X s con M lo β Higgs case. and and B dominated the ery same minimal no w → mess v the e fairly y indirect top and scale on tan to N is ecomes is with mass, B is sho e this 1 parameter of b the the — − t e = deca for for to in ositiv er µ of this A dilaton w Therefore, limit By p distance b + scale this correlations , . µ h e mess observ the NLSP 3 γ the b um but Higgs N s case large The if n plane eak → to scenarios and compared The messenger X or smaller short the to w s ) , searc subsection.) t. 8 0.9, β ely a B the h mixing. with → 4: the − ter tributions figure on the uc out to R harged B 10 for ˜ t tan for for c ossible m In If As con wing , ligh GMSB ortan electro direct p 1 − excluded relativ wn ound e y M L ˜ b only ( b b the scenario Figure the top from is imp than do turns mSUGRA t true and and ratio is get follo JHEP03(2003)054 1 Br up = not uon hing than region m the GMSB t mess will N branc the and The green ortan . − and enhanced in 2 ). es) µ with 7 e the + imp b µ curv del case, SUSY µ and figure a → can mo figure as s more (b) B ound, 400 dashed (see b ratio same previous the and GMSB (GeV) ecome 1 , del b short the M 350 mass -9 hing the the µµ 122GeV but -8 mo − R are µ the to for 5x10 + 1x10 branc 300 (a) NLSP µ (in − 10 → µ the plane − legends similar with + s y ) 250 b µ β 10 mSUGRA ) B – is 120GeV γ -8 The constraining, s of → 15 tan . 10 X the , s and – 1 200 -7 B 5x10 not in unit γ → M GeV s ( excluded e is endence 1x10 in B X 15 the is ( 26 γ lik 150 r the s 10 , 42 dep → B X in ratio. = 115GeV and SUSY µ 58 tly B a , region → 100 the es) y 10 scale mess to hing for − B of M gra curv 10 50

60 50 40 30 20 10 tan × branc significan β plots Still and The γ 1 . solid s 48 = X tour messenger tributions to the case. GeV → correlations con mess 15 con up (in B The enhanced N here. e 10 ) mess y . The e b b − The 7 N = b µ − + with 6: 5: er can 10 µ eated mess w can × lo → M rep 2 s excluded e SUSY µ hargino-stop B b ratio c to the scenario Figure Figure ( a and is JHEP03(2003)054 5 is Br the = than (3.7) (3.6) (3.5) scale most atron region the effects within This leading mess ev In G T case, mediated N and (assuming generically R green is at y ed. smaller is b larger es) this with it the 1 the is messenger ultiplet. en e enhanced hiev In = curv del m e gets and ac giv b . and y the mo e ratio is breaking mess b ely observ vit can N ound, dashed and to b − hing can VEV higher ectiv 400 µ GMSB ergra SUSY + with parameter form: , µ (GeV) short t 1 mass i resp fields sup the , branc ) hance M A limit 350 † c → whose ¶ the z − z s for ecomes er , sector the 122GeV µ the F b no z B NLSP ( + (in . -8 300 scenario -7 fields, z of ζ -8 K -9 µ 2 upp ∂ scale. ∂ t for 10 θ and the plane + 5x10 − sequestered 1x10 3 1 ould k X scale ultiplet, → y 1x10 ) ) 5x10 messenger hidden † 250 w b F β 10 – ter s this + onen Φ (AMSB) 120GeV GMSB ratio of B + erm , hidden form: of 16 tan 60 W the 1 Planc ligh , (Φ 200 er – 1 µ there sup the 10 ξ = ≈ b the the comp hing unit h M so-called get y 2 i 26 ∗ ( excluded in β that 42 of 1 messenger um in X and vit 150 is M log n h and the resulting the 3 58 stop tan breaking t) reduced branc 115GeV = gra the − mass in ratio. VEV SUSY µ the I. X has 100 if the a I the auxiliary = the able the region a F the if es) y large assumed e smaller, is stop K hing us for in tial ter constan SUSY the and 50

is

h Still gra

Run

60 50 40 30 20 10 tan curv tak β Th ery ter observ it uc ligh v oten t. GeV hand, branc field plots m p The ligh γ will 18 . solid the s for atron is gets X 10 X through tour ortan ev it the the other it mixing. GeV T ahler × are , → mediated only con scenario, 4 K¨ 15 imp z cosmological . auxiliary pseudoscalar (in B field only 2 the the 10 ) stop y space, an b the − The ≈ and = the of and µ is ∗ , On if orld more + h 8 7: although AMSB summary w Φ µ X M large − I. mess , ensator I F anishing Anomaly In 10 → v reac M vy the our the s excluded × ecome ossible B Figure where Here ( hea comp 2 and b where the is Run parameter p increases, to 3.3 the to In JHEP03(2003)054 e e in v on ed on del the W the the the the o alid also that (3.8) (3.9) v . ahler gauge ab mo in µ solv is in for on AMSB K¨ certain generic fermion fermion limit ) is generate ln are ts a − the the Note where dimension er the not µ to uine w discussed + is found discussion lo AMSB they µ scalar e scalar remark and that dels ect parameters: Only gen e b effects efficien ears, b problem the → y y mo lagrangian the co aux t. The form to that resp y t s time. four or y b vit M of to equations. v can anomalous ]. B so original ecome ( general assume 2 0 this vit [9 b fla G t resulting with B enden first m recen R the wing ergra − the . class scale us will function µ is that This dep ergra The of the th + arian and sup the add aux µ follo v excluded µ . scenario(s) SUSY eta wing: , this e or and y scenarios tiation erall in sup . M ln b is for v a during , ij w for v and y) → δ the o w the fla bulk /d follo op SUSY µ aux argued i s eV y vit the ork ¶ a , b Z T B scale M 2 0 , w , scale ) sector, tly when the region 0 differen AMSB that ln k m The opular eV consider , single parameters γ on the 60 β d masses m 100 one-lo p ergra are T descriptions. + so e natural this ]. a are − + 2 the lost ≤ ≤ – w aux recen d a ecified GUT t) j y tan for sup the 2 in o ≡ aux [48 ranges: is β ≤ and γ b M mass slepton sp generically i in , 17 w aux 0 al. y go scalar M expanding γ terms ], + ) a en the ecame ) minimal are ork, is lo – , m tan m i µ e π α ˙ b et 4 γ el results y the w 16 enden γ are a Y 4 plots wing at giv 1) ( denotes b fixed v b ≤ ≤ ≤ , h − nicet , (3.5 soft del the i in lev h The 2 1 2 is mak µ − no-scale 0 5 γ 11 sign( , scenario . fermion this The . follo U(1) of eV 3 mo 1 , eq. indep tour the = = = whic . this T on × whic tree eV In Φ = a k or 2 ij [47 L the T 0) (and er F con 20 ij v Anisimo a , terms M m γ scalar form ]). A ev problem = β 50 er extracted (2) conditions s zero v (fla er, AMSB w scenarios completely 2 0 acting the X breaking e o e = [49 analysis soft on SU the ev masses v b tan m (with y Ho scenarios ( w w × h are → . ha dot aux to c form 5) anishing initial the / 2 0 Ho v sho can tac e M B mediation e AMSB SUSY v orld case m the and 33 minimal e o dels for w non for sequestered − w fermion the energy example, SU(3) del. mak , the ab and subsection. a mo , 1 orld parameters the and w 8 terms t µ mo , in scale w − oid for i of lo es added with , the v AMSB gaugino 2) plane brane us, − Φ a e l group (3 scalar at ) tak soft − these + β Th to l = (see, the phenomenological el figure class tak g s the brane pure expressions ( field AMSB a equations tial X simply b of tan lev e In In The gauge scan subsequen , arbitrary v of e kground dels 0 the the order the the → o v ecial e uon oten m p in ( masses B the bac W in sp Earlier couplings true SM masses. mo Here tree set m ab in in of for ha JHEP03(2003)054 h is 0, of er in ed Br ed no the ter the the mess this able with > Note y is N whic b upp the in SUSY µ ligh on ounds. In . ) 9 b w hargino- . observ h observ region for − − c ecause 0. compared lo the and e , µ b there ely uc is tribution constrained 7 with 10 < data b y) y + m unobserv scenarios − b the es) µ − t mass µ × indirect excluded e con µ gra ectiv with − 10 e 4 b Also e can + → µ t curv × µ op are + scenario s since resp 6 µ lo AMSB curren can B strongly scenario tribution → ( (ligh than particle to observ is excluded → negativ s GMSB B the con dashed ratio, s B features regions is 700 stop to up AMSB excluded. B the y the green and minimal AMSB larger e 30 (GeV) SUSY y ter 0 hing with scenarios, region b the in short e for Higgs -9 these m green > t 0 0. deca b the the 600 the in ossible ligh hargino-stop deca m β and 119GeV SUSY µ < 119.2GeV the y p 118GeV 115GeV 119.2GeV 119GeV c branc 3x10 the All ould of a b for other enhanced the µ e ratio γ w vier b tan (in e s the e to 500 b harged and the X ted hand, that small cannot c 10 case Higgs consisten hea and es sign. y -8 plane ). hing − not → y b so h e ) e -8 for can large 9 b the 10 – gra constraining β 10 the the B 1x10 uc mak negativ ratio − 400 other scenario of ould 5x10 m µ 18 branc In 26 tan the represen and and ositiv w less 42 + , and with – plots and the compared 0 − p the µ a negativ masses is This it is unit hing µ h, 9 m e ( 300 marginally + γ → b on excluded in AMSB SM s and µ the tour s ecomes is (dark), space and stop is X searc This the to b region). B branc region), h → eV 1, con . the y wn in stronger figures vy SUSY µ → T 200 s with a its the out B to B bro gra whic mass en 50 , es) the space scenarios. dark hea minimal scenario, from e β for particle (See ev = e, w is

the large 5

100 The curv since − µµ

is tan (the parameter 30 25 20 15 10 stop the turns β (the scenario tan small µ aux sho t R I, 0. scale plots + I, I del, e SUSY I M also noscale additiv µ the in > solid s the w negativ Also no e oson ound SUSY µ large µ is mo parameter X tour or b . b the b for a all scenarios Run the AMSB γ for Run or s of the → also con F and constrain X (in the where is B the In γ mass ound, ) Higgs plane , eV s if AMSB 2). → b µ deviation should The atron − atron T ) in a Almost AMSB X µ 10 reason t − region β tribution ev B ev 0 + 8: 50 . from stau g the mSUGRA T T µ → 8 ( mass the the < = on con SUSY µ the tan In this a → B , neutral 3 the the the 0 in the figure s aux uon y m B figure µM stop suppressed. b but to M at the m the that limit Higgs or Therefore, Figure case, ( the signals ( at significan in JHEP03(2003)054 in in Br with µµ (3.11) (3.10) the R and function with . 2 ) scenarios es) γ s , X curv 3) figure kinetic , → AMSB 2 as , B 1 ( r dashed 700 = , gauge B same 0 a -6 ( -8 (GeV) -7 minimal 0 = (b) the -22 π short the m k 4 5x10 ij the 1x10 / 600 120GeV and are and the T A , for ab µ δ -9 a (in -38 tial 119GeV 119GeV -8 = 10 , Breaking 3x10 − 500 plane legends ab 0 with oten 1x10 ) f 10 p ) – β = − 117GeV The of µ 2 ij 120GeV 19 . tan + , SUSY , m – µ 400 -54 ahler 0 eV ) unit i T K¨ m → ( Φ in ∗ i s 50 Φ , B = the ( r 300 − SUSY µ in aux B ∗ a aux Mediated T M M es) (a) for + = nonminimal for

of a T

200

curv

60 tan 50 40 30 20 10 β M plots ln( 0. 3 wing solid < Gaugino − tour µ scenario = follo the dels, con correlations and K and (in the mo ) AMSB The eV y The − T µ vit + 9: 10: 50 µ assume = No-scale → e minimal ergra get s w aux e B w 3.4 If sup M ( Figure Figure the JHEP03(2003)054 e a γ is is e, of in at s b ed for for del the the oth and and uon − w as eing X cou- b from as µ to when ) name scale, easily b w gauge In SUSY in SUSY mo sm + γ masses hidden matter noscale I, → allo er particle s realized through ) scenario µ ]. I massiv ratio orks. a the out − tial X ev masses the can [5 B masses SUSY µ and → w scenarios the the and on effects Then us + → only s trilinear distinct hing Run discussions oten µ Ho on and the MSSM to one scenario G indirect soft are In B p Th ecome B gaugino turns noscale is framew stau . R in messenger ( y mediation b e → MSB naturally and ccurs b h B nonzero the tial ˜ for g The 0 bulk. 2.1 o e branc s and ter the the atron masses the b mediation limits ahler = B ersal ]. SUSY µ scenarios I, for ( limit. ev 10 ) oten to a the K¨ I whic k and the at h elop ligh observ the no-scale ˜ g T − 12 B masses. p ratio ij gaugino y , masses univ included in A 10 generating µµ to b could dev section the parameters uon due theoretical excluded MSB Run e the R y searc [11 terms breaking = × and zero, This ˜ g the if brane hing breaking ahler er non where and onding liv γ vitino del 2 ij the can at only of s 70 K¨ een gaugino( m soft including X in gra atron mo fermion w ossible thereb ∼ SUSY µ region deep direct stau/sm branc = scenario SUSY scale. p with the et etter ev a able SUSY the fields → namely the visible b b y T e corresp to B the the region, b corrections b constrained the the d for the the B eak gaugino condition, Therefore get β the analysis dels from o scalar the w to the up 0 the y . tly Therefore, called b scenarios not gauge γ , ell mo – the discussed no-scale = at tan for ultiplets, that s and to up the is w MSB), unobserv forms hand, X ˜ µ g B denote 20 aux with ed ( c the electro and including erm ose excluded dimension, 2) ecome ould scale – y conserving, M fermions scale. understo → Only y) large b ho plots w ticorrelation Since is − e vit sup or significan the en, no relax other B that b g it excluded SUGRA zero v scenario gra an ]. Supp observ ecomes e confined ( scenario the justified is extra add mitigated to [6 b , t of fla w GUT is to tour is scalar us ) the the scenario an brok anish. ergra easily e If µ v − are region tly not gauge b uon the wn is is con Th in . and µ This phenomenological (ligh the and c time. The sup On m simply k to + egan realized ound do in arises to can ecause − Noscale 8 . ere µ to M b b sign( c region b µ − y the bulk . w as fields mSUGRA are + blac the has first ecific there enhanced, y spacetime. − M → is w er 10 1.14. green µ breaking SUSY w µ us s form data. w Earlier h sp SUSY µ it the calit significan ]. scale on close × + gra the , B a lo th the no-scale → uc lo sho y µ The gauginos. is branes 2 ). the β Also and s y scale b This [50 s to brane ery m naturally e matter X v of for BNL B the SUSY the where e e parameters w and the scale tan dark b found felt and ref. deca (3.12 , e → 0.95 than simplest v to parameters e dels. olving ork e the building, role o 11 plane. and and in v b dimensional b w B visible so-called can eq. problem the The ) brane in mo − ab the MSSM een space, l del β − soft Due the excluded. or w as SUGRA” e assumed + can date µ t. the the can v l this alternativ mediated and e et s mo + the smaller from functions, figure the ounds tan b messenger b e tak fla higher particles, compactification µ , in on X b effects other ys After In hidden AMSB same discussed compactification run a → aux en the → the the ysics op s e ould opular ecomes ositiv aries M in SUSY p ph scenarios plings w “no-scale and brane, kinetic at gauginos. the breaking the fields lo at b the scenario gaugino giv B ( Higgs parameter constrain accommo alw the B v w mass p signals are JHEP03(2003)054 t er of Br the w soft The ligh lo limit (3.12) (3.14) (3.13) the in all effects, effects, the e The breaking X details and mediation y b to mak es) the problem. c i , SUSY 2 Ψ breaking | breaking on , curv i scenario. ersymmetric anomaly aux Ψ excluded coupled sup M is slepton of ends | e energy SUSY SUSY v 2 dashed in 500 pure are noscale ¶ dep w ha ) onic of h the lo (GeV) ρ y region 10 the effects 120GeV M from π h y -9 short aux ( 4 -8 -9 b a 450 then M whic the for tac α and e the c i 3x10 green k direction 1x10 5x10 µ , W Ψ arises i a bination the , kic (in i the C 400 plane aux e 26 flat c i Ψ 10 ) , thresholds a com M a Ψ − ensator β i X and ) φ solv ould φ 10 of determined vy es Ψ F ij – AMSB. w M π δ tan ρ 350 ( X of ) 42 is 4 , i a threshold comp ρ hea and 21 115GeV = ound, λ α kind aux X b – − pure vy )) unit = X a eyl M 58 has describ the X ρ of ( messengers F (1 of 300 , in is W h i hea W − N mass freedoms ] one 2 X the a (1 h jectories i , of the [51 general. − VEV whic in SUSY µ If ) N λ stau 250 ) a tra ratio. harged jectory of t in X + M ≈ es) M the ( t 1 a ( for k tra b ligh 2 ij M If hing ij degree 6= mediation −

˜

curv G ˜ 200

A ( m dynamics, w ρ 60 50 40 30 20 10 onen tan β AMSB R the gauge-c plots vy mediation singlet scenario. = = = y elo branc t b of ) ) ) b solid but the γ hea comp s pure tour M M M e ligh ( ( ( X ors v scenario. the F a k v 2 ij the anomaly con a ij the → scales lea M anomaly m conserving fla (in A excluded the B ) mediation off to out The tial N − is is tains stabilized, GMSB µ the φ + as 11: is energy SUSY µ con oten F to t the gauge y X deflected ell region Deflected A b → erp del w in y s w tegrating ound B as The ( where Figure parameters sup as with not ho mo 3.5 in gra parameters b JHEP03(2003)054 , y 3 ). µµ Br its b uon M R fields in other (3.8 m ected, (3.15) the of (a) scenarios generate gaugino- the eq. exp the and flip space: parameters in een AMSB As stabilized On The es) w that could is en of AMSB sign et additional 10. b other curv wn. . X giv 1 . del one the hand. ) Note sho as ≤ w µ y y . parameter with mo . b b that , γ ho µµ s deflected 0 are dashed without 80 parameters, R the X 2 0 sign( eV > 10 wing T plane the ≤ − m (TeV) ened µ → MSSM, ) correlations short AMSB 120GeV aux 80 70 10 clarify β of 93 for B eak follo . input M , ≤ 0 assuming eeping of w the the the to k N tan -9 e , , six , the b in 60 aux is b 6 (in with -8 plane and y ecause origin -8 -7 unit onds -9 13 er aux b 3x10 t , M b minimal ) = 10 v , , β in − 10 o can 1x10 M 5x10 6 ≤ 5x10 ed ( N 50 β − 5x10 µ − t setup the 10 and – a tan inevitable 115GeV 10 simple , eV 10 10 a of in the corresp tan scan T a is 22 × The ∼ aux 13 40 e h consisten and in parameters , 26 – 42 10 describ it es 22 put M ) ]. unit W as 0. ( 2 0 − is , 58 constrain giv ]. in whic µ > [52 soft ρ m 30 GeV plots more + γ the 0 µ than figures s [51 , µ tually 12 large ≈ in X del SUSY µ en In 10 50 scale → tour and ρ a , as 20 s ev → k es) 0 e = ≤ mo AMSB squared M B con for mediation greater = β (gAMSB) ( B hanism tak M e ρ curv B the

10 5

alues.

), e b

the Planc 50 tan 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 pure v β AMSB tan 6, ecomes w mass mec plots , es case. w b AMSB, (b) ≤ = solid the ) the (3.14 3 aux erg sho − N anomaly mak tour w b µ , and e M cannot the mediation tioned 3 scalar eq. are + ) w elo con AMSB ein γ µ , M b analysis, 2 ij s (in GeV minimal soft 12 ˜ of X m ) → 12 The from MDM of − , s pure deflected k 10 µ → B flip aforemen ij + anomaly ( ersal 12: = ˜ µ B figure line the A B ( the clear to umerical e M Gaugino-assisted B In → n sign Coleman-W univ is the symmetries s or B 3.6 or hand, anomalous ( Figure where In assisted with the the the fixed Then F and As unlik JHEP03(2003)054 e is in at tly the are the are are W 2 µµ . ˜ m in (3.16) gauge SUSY R β are masses 2 0 . of 2 0 the m masses tan results with m dominan assumption mAMSB: sleptons of scenario ) matter scalar γ legends and s . the The the large 0 X scalar role onic the breaking the The as y mediation. adding > AMSB → for to h AMSB w to y the µ 0. B tation, b Under ( via , tac y hard no r space. > 2 same y / B ed µ 2 3 pla ecially , the . but tin tribute m bulk. anomaly 1 the ) (b) solv a ortional esp and 2 represen µ masses = is ) con is term 0 and the t, L η and and 1 ∗ and get = , prop in parameter sign( µ M ρ a ( scalar mAMSB, gaugino-assisted , 6, but space, erators second 2 the scenario 2 π problem = , AMSB with constrain op g eV er the β 16 ) T v N gauginos with mediation – gauginos The ) − o matter , i oth ersal, in µ ( i b tan 23 100 + the AMSB C and These µ , slepton strong – GeV ≤ univ the parameter a 2 12 → similar from / , gaugino s 3 of 10 es onic η scenario. not for scanning B gauge y m (3)Γ(4) of ( are = assisted h ζ r is 8 giv sector. oundary 2 ≤ − B predictions b γ h M most tac 0 s , + 10 2 ybrid 2 AMSB scale X (a) / in MSSM tributions the h × Casimir 3 ˜ the whic m with t of hidden a → 6 e gaugino m sector , . of con v the = 1 pure is B ≤ 2 input ha the the it . get β m where e the at ) of w on scenario hidden − dominan , tan tribution quadratic in placing µ features correlations + ≤ the con masses . e µ regard, mAMSB. the 3 but terms eing 2 scenario in AMSB b is erators The er → masses the ) v this i s op soft o parameter Explicitly ( scalar form, figure and 13: B to In C ( singlet as AMSB qualitativ B The The scan scalar additional op, deflected some no e y harges. original same where Figure the the pure similar 1-lo The of whereas b cured. c W find get JHEP03(2003)054 e in of w the ec- and µµ AMSB R resp and alues harginos , v large c Finally T es) with . ) the γ 10 curv s and − X 10 S nonzero ( → × hand, generically B dashed . gaugino-assisted the ( mediations 45 2 r prediction. are B of 900 to the other erfields short duli SM (b) (GeV) up figure for 1 the 800 sup µ M the as terms a masses the and , On to (in in 120GeV µ plane 700 a -8 same ) dulus 10 from β − squark mo 1x10 600 the -9 dilaton/mo 10 with small. tan tribute , ) – of 1 are is − The 5x10 10 500 µ erall M -9 con . − ( 24 + v with b deviation o µ µ unit – parametrized 26 15 + 3x10 can 400 the µ → in legends is 42 s dels and in large 115GeV and → B and ( 300 s a r The mo t SUSY µ es) no a B B 15 is y ligh 200 curv dilaton for (a) breaking of ely string of deca

scenario. 5 there 100

figures tan solid 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 β plots ts the SUSY and the and relativ , tour to onen 1 AMSB . 14 0. (in 1 are con correlations ) teracting > ≤ − theory comp in µ µ µµ The + figure The R µ in tributions with sleptons ≤ 14: 15: → string eakly 0 . s con 1 the W auxiliary B gaugino-assisted ( the Figure Figure the depicted and Br their find scenarios the In 3.7 JHEP03(2003)054 . o 7 G an on w − are the the tial will R and t This scale aded scale short other as 10 space y in (3.19) (3.18) (3.17) ts plane. SUSY theory . b ev 1 the minima oten × ) analysis − T and y that e 0.95 the − p β found µ 2 , b with /F termediate + neutralino- vit e string = S µ (in as b in een tan i el. F , can GeV starts commen at w n ahler the 10 → ergra lev − et = termediate 16 parameter K¨ assume discussed s aux can the breaking dominated or b large in θ one 10 B conflict F 10 , and M sup ( the ∗ i the this terms if y γ of × as Other ]. and e time. ary s and the Φ tan problem 2 i of v e and an . harge at . X the [54 b c Φ already 2 dilaton as soft i − ij = tial, unit l first δ n phenomenological → in scenarios this can ) from + scale ∗ l in able effectiv the can een 2 ulae s B aux ortion theories, oten T The color b the . GUT µµ , es) . p − X in p , ) problems figure M without . R + θ M µ i µ θ e defined hand, for form SUSY µ = + → GUT the has Earlier Φ ws T to 10 observ curv a SUSY µ ( µ energy cos − sin string . 2 ij large B a example, UFB that wn − + sign( ork w an 2 scale m 2 10 a for → follo ters / µ ) other / domination w angle lo on on 3 3 ∗ e effectiv solid s for + usual × as kno erfield T m µ and find m B similar ) the ) , – 50 ∗ this , plots ∗ + GUT ell y the the ear prob γ the sup → β k T S heterotic encoun s w domination T as On in 25 scale, s ij also in dilaton + X + y CCB to (in naturally B app – A e deca ]. tour tan can b ln( er en ) S T one parameters: Goldstino − I 3 tional W w → − I t Discussions 3( 3( the con large lo giv not MSSM µ = the with − en and ]–[45 . t √ √ dilaton 4-dimensional v B + the ) equal γ as es teracting − ∗ µ , masses phenomenology s 30). l aux Run are the [43 for = = the is S e in con + enden do X the the directions l b M ∼ → S T θ aux functions ignore + s of scenario, with θ 3 . of string of s w F F → β e t e X M S constan the theories √ scale from v ratio S B ( atron M can w ( eakly elo o indep B fermion = ln → detailed at b ev tan w π ab theories eigh the ], case. ab angle limit where a 4 T δ − Br for w B hing or to w en 16 GUT ork, θ M string SUSY µ F The = = , function three w a the the from running scalar giv the sho oth ]. sin y wn correlation string ab domination [11 K in b b e 2 f of dular G branc / usual cesses the a µ coming w this [55 ] e 3 are R (do y ] and from , v 2) mo Goldstino m kinetic mSUGRA up pro [56 In the 16 hanism. [54 ha The − has ounded teracting the ed es) = GeV ecified e dilaton b g y the in the the h the ( ersalit ]: b w teracting ref. mec 11 sp ts. un is from gauge scattering aux other curv in to scenario, deriv scenario [54 the figure 10 i is en scale. in starts whic univ uon e M that n the ∼ parameters eakly In In the b m giv del us this w this ely) X one eakly ucleus are and mo Here Here tiv breaking Note can Then example, n and running of M if w soft dashed string In constrain the Therefore of discuss 1.15, similar of JHEP03(2003)054 w Br on er- the lo with p t the theory and scenario. excluded The and tal is es) theory differen es) M curv e limit. Compactified region curv fiv . dominated ], fundamen dashed green heterotic [57 dashed one coupling theory 400 -7 dilaton -8 -8 -9 the -9 the of short (GeV) (GeV) 300 122GeV 1 the 2x10 5x10 1x10 5x10 short for 3x10 -9 and M Witten AUX the 120GeV strong 350 -9 M for the SUGRA facets 3x10 (in -8 and plane t the 10 250 5x10 -8 ound, (in a 10 ) b 120GeV 10 v mediations plane 300 1x10 − β in 10 11-D ) 5x10 ra ˇ − 10 β -7 26 tan 10 mass , Ho differen the – of 200 duli 26 1 tan e 250 of , 1x10 M theory as 26 b ratio. ( stau and 42 unit 42 aux – t to unit 58 M the in 58 150 hing ( 200 in ligh ed 115GeV string 115GeV in the Witten regarded the SUSY µ branc dilaton/mo es) eliev the a SUSY µ in y 100 b γ 150 of a w e b s is for curv es) X no for with orks →

curv 100

are w 50

60 tan 50 40 30 20 10

solid B β describ plots 60 tan 50 40 30 20 10 plots β theory excluded h . the the solid is π tour theory M tour to 15 whic . (in the theories con 0 , M con ) the pioneering = − region (in ound µ of θ The y ) b The + − µ the er µ gra and e w + 17: t 16: → limit 5 µ M lo . s wing ligh Heterotic → B +0 ( the s = ollo y B ( Figure Figure F ² 3.8 turbativ energy Br called The b JHEP03(2003)054 ] t k ts of en- [58 and and with oin mass ]: w y (3.22) (3.20) (3.21) whose p 6-dim. simple b . enden Planc lo unifica- , tial [59 ¸ a length T en ´ the e θ ws the assumption fixed dimensional gluino oten indep general, giv the of , p 4-dim tak and 4 cos manifold ∗ i in e 11-dim. follo theory: e θ S the Φ are date to This i w au three as Φ M sin the ahler olume deriv ² orbifold ersal v K¨ ¶ 3 are . ∗ adjusting wing olving ) √ and erfields branes S v can the 2 theories µ y the outset. t univ (the α accommo in b + y Calabi-Y − follo at sup there functions y heterotic V one θ S non vit the sign( , 2 . e can vit the + v the 10-dim ρ V duli o the constan ∗ that and π cos effects is , 3 gra ergra ) In T ab branes from / in theories), mo , ² the ecome 1 3 V 2 al) + t β b theory t. for V sup . 6 11 M olume Note + the T t 3 ) e 11 v . space ) terv ersal M ∗ tan µ ∗ (3 M this (or running T in 3 Newton’s enden S , exten – + / + 10-dim. 3 from 2 i + G ) univ with / masses + ) θ θ 4 o ∗ 3 R 27 theory , ) π T dels effectiv the 2 1 / constan parameters S is ed w T ( ² 1 π ( t – indep (4 some brane, 6 α cos sin mo + π and compactifying ² orbifold ) h 2 2(4 The eing 3 scalar ≡ ² to T del deriv 2 b ( term , input ² √ , with energy compactified = = + eac orbifolds Z ¸ t ln θ / 11 mo ρ the + ) ) θ are w 1 efore, a-Witten 3 string (6 or π Newton’s on o orse. S urther v θ T M ² b S lo . sin the − F mass w w ³ ra cos ) ˇ t au ) as enden sin Re( ∗ problem duli, Re( 3 2 e and scale the the 1. and ) ² Ho ) αT S ² b get √ ² 2 living , 2 length of mo = of 3 + κ + y 2 scalar + + this 1 teracting / indep − , angle T S S 3 will θ 1 from consider ( in e orbifold. ma (3 the string h Calabi-Y (3 m the ln( e h π fiv sin − ab coupling of groups er satisfy w length 4 δ · h − the 1 (where 2 more b 2 function and / · ² if ts There 9 3 2 are Z = = mitigate / at / − ij ² 11 um 3 + m whic 1 (the δ are SUGRA strongly Goldstino n problem ab gauge 3 2 gauge K 3 + S M m ρ f / e onen h in 3 y space √ 2 3 8 can 1 π there or = kinetic dimensional the E √ m − v terms 2 space). suc there justified o t), three is ork κ fla = = = comp wski w or θ t o effectiv a k of soft 2 ij F ell orbifold 11-th gauge ij case dge-Bett w M m ternal A The In Therefore SUSY the Here is parameter with the framew Ho tion the Mink ergy scales: scalar constan in JHEP03(2003)054 e ]. π is 0, in of of of to b en no for the the the and and 15 it [58 erall . is HRS most mass → three giv 0 ], There hange θ arious In θ as theory can has c kinetic masses similar ² v Ov has is in = 11 terms trilinear common a Also, e the 3 ork, standard 0. the 0) , 0 M θ of b . mass w subsection analysis and problem M corrections M as soft θ > and angle < < the ² same soft [61 all nonstandard scale. the fix and gauge gaugino 3 unification ² ˜ op 2 τ , the top ell er γ e this ould limit s v and edding) masses. lo theories w m only the < for the w with w the o the µM b the ² X the in 1 1 t space the plane, heterotic M as that 0) string the previous one − of em theory ) for < → less t if and = β parameter h that ² scenario, scalar scale, hand, in Goldstino mind, the where than B ² the or M the < prefers left tial ], in of alue tan situation range at string the 0 in whic , v eak the for dominan γ t masses 1 60 mass problems s case w other w e 2 ij heterotic phenomenological is commen , except parameter other oten more of standard AMSB X M the the a m a ( p (for space scenario than of [11 is the e range the M → > heterotic UFB niceties the narro µ (the electro the (except 2 in a commen AMSB B On negativ Then gaugino in 2) gaugino the ahler Earlier mak 1 theory − . the the . M ery in include considered scenario a . larger K¨ mass 2 ² edding − region µ cesses v as the in < θ us / the functions 8 b e 3 + in and g . to and ² ( en e 0 µ has at and the pro theory for parameter 0 m em lies general tak Let – ev − sign string < and are er, domination ² fixed wide has → ² to > theory ² M 0 common no is uon a a h ev one s of 28 unlik its gaugino 2 can this w m CCB Then B and is – on in one masses mSUGRA t: for except the energy it 5 Ho µM whic . with θ on of mass β the string phenomenological ersal dilaton the order signs w space, heterotic With 0. of +0 scenarios. lo hanges there but scale. that on c heterotic . tan scalar parameter the case ending are case the out < nonstandard univ corrections = constan the µ scenario for h 3 ² e implies ab and on Therefore the op dep the range the gaugino ers the the scenario, M The Note 0 large ecial v ts lo , found heterotic 0. in this for discussion . whic in ). > teracting e sp ositiv care the ∗ parameter hanges sign for in → b of this y that p in c reco a one S time. messenger –21 domination parameter θ Newton’s The scenario connection, where is ed certain theory plots + in not all 18 the exists for problems ]. SUSY µ del can whereas commen one S the most 0 latter a note y first space ( M for and ersalit do , solv eakly o teracting this mass limit [61 spin mo at tour In w → w e to in pla ¿ dilaton t − the | of finite, the UFB . w hange θ ) are τ univ e figures the ² c ij ∗ scenario scenario the to con parameter duced, realized + or the the theory T m theories problem. for in in τ F in | sigma of s and while eakly mak the a can + gaugino or heterotic to coupling limit the this are UFB X w M M parameter Therefore, altogether repro h T ork mass the us ( w orth e w e AMSB the the → anish of mass comes that Although The CCB b w suc remaining the or v function. and , that sho B Let In edding. edding π parameter gauge • • sign. the b b this > Note couplings em the em compared phenomenology mSUGRA the CCB heterotic namely gaugino negativ scalar region its effect Note to θ correlations and parameter in heterotic and JHEP03(2003)054 the with new t obtain and gaugino heterotic to e es) theory the brough M curv for made negativ . SUSY µ een for 2 a b dashed theories heterotic µ 200 e (b) v of 10 the figure short ha (GeV) 1 and 180 as for M sign , erstring the 26 µµ the R sup same (in 160 plane 115GeV 10 ) attempts in (a) flip the − β -9 -9 -8 42 -8 e 140 10 w are tan eral with 5x10 3x10 , 1x10 – of if 5x10 1 ) branes γ Sev M ts s 29 120 ( − unit X – legends D the in → of 100 B in The ( . r constrain SUSY µ π B es) role a buildings. 80 15 . oth 0 the for b curv the del = of 60 θ mo

solid plots

60 tan 50 40 30 20 10 and β . 5 the . π ysics tour satisfying dels 15 ph +0 . (in con 0 correlations ) = mo with = − ² understanding µ θ The The + in µ with particle and 19: 18: → brane 8 . in parameter. s problem 0 D ances B − ( theory no = ideas Adv mass 3.9 M is Figure Figure ² Br JHEP03(2003)054 ) p γ s ose D the erall X GeV, t v h ho gauge o c → gaugino heterotic 300 e B w whic SM ( ≤ (the termediate the 2 B differen and in ]. 3, / to 3 , 2 for 63 on m , and , , 1 e (the ersal µµ /π = liv [62 . 4 R SUSY µ i 2 a subsection, univ ≤ GeV (b) all according θ 12 (b) this ≤ figure for 10 and 4 3 In / and as ), ariations) π √ , − v generations / branes, − µ 1 µµ 3 + completely t R same µ = around differ. i their is → and not (a) Θ the space: s can or B fix differen are ( are e scale with B – or ) W groups γ terms . s 30 and MSSM X parameter – masses 3.6 string legends same → gauge SUSY µ the a (SM, wing B The ( the . r breaking SM section (a) π B follo fermion on dels Also 15 in . the een 0 the the mo w SUSY put = et er of scalar θ v e b o b where scale. soft relaxed. del, and e considered del scan 8 can b . mo e 0 GUT mo del w − can correlations mo = correlations resulting this 4-dimensional and ² than In brane The 50. the The ]. D brane ≤ with of limit) − 20: and β 21: [63 rather D unification tan ecific dulus theory the sp M and (semi)realistic groups Figure Figure mo branes mass a in patterns scale) JHEP03(2003)054 e in ed gauge (3.25) (3.24) (3.26) (3.23) (3.27) ositiv hiev energy natural 1 p gaugino ac scenario, a w is lo in the U(1) goldstinos only this the e , in and the the ersal ¶ ws: in tak masses ) of I e θ univ . follo w M from erfield scalar ( subsections. 3 sin 3 , y , , , . as Higgs 2 2 α b non ) ¸ ¸ ¸ sup , 3 the . I ¢ ¢ ¢ , , , GeV 1 when θ θ θ violations en ) , ¸ ¸ ¸ + M and duli 2 2 2 are i = 2 ( directions 14 ) θ θ θ θ 3 or i SUSY µ giv y Θ I previous 2 2 2 v mo α cos cos cos a 10 b , θ 3 i dilaton M angles, the ersal, cos θ fla 2 3 2 1 2 2 for ( × cos cos cos are T 1 2 en the + Θ Θ Θ masses the masses cos α Θ sin (5 ) ¢ ¢ ¢ one 2 univ + + + in giv I 2 1 2 3 2 2 2 / to eral / + 3 12 θ θ θ Θ Θ Θ 3 1 3 M larger fields 1 2 2 2 ( θ m ) and are 10 m e sev 2 − − − also I = – goldstino ) b α ) 1 1 1 sin sin sin ∗ 2 i i = gaugino cos ∗ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ M sfermion of for T 31 ( 3 parametrize studied Θ I + S 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 Higgs 1 fields – ) 1 + α the M + the I 2Θ ) − − − − − − i tributions masses could i e ecomes = T S 1 1 1 1 1 1 µ M T and 2 in ( ( b b , ( ( hoices 2 con | · · · · · · ) 1 c that y 3 3 θ i I and to α , 2 2 2 2 2 2 . √ √ Θ there scenarios / / / / / / | M duli θ 2 3 2 L 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 cos ( = = = gaugino appropriate 1 Note Y m m m m m m m ) other ersalit masses SUSY i mo sin I and Θ α S 1 4 ]. 2 2 2 with F ======or other F the / / / M 1 3 3 3 F ( = c c c 2 1 e 2 L univ [63 2 Q 2 e 2 d 3) 2 u Y 2 H 2 H θ m m m , the three m m ersal, m 3 3 3 α m m 2 2 determined m m , w √ √ √ gaugino 1(1) 1 unlik Then, for is . sin mass enhanced no 0 univ = = = I = the as 2 3 i = M Y ( solutions. are non ) M M parametrization i I M ell space. scalar masses Θ w case the M scenario, ( scale the 1 the there as field for α soft ecome and this i b this θ dify T ers that in string in b Since The S, cesses mo y a e um when w The where Note pro coupling where w And masses n the JHEP03(2003)054 , , ) ) 0 ]. it 2 in in at − 10 for ect are ear the the the < µ this H − y [64 that only ( 1.15, large large + GeV dulus θ (3.28) in scalar µ edded of 10 and asp of e µ app e param- neutral b itself to < b 2) b mo × t, bles en 300 terms → 4 − ersalit em masses / six ws up Higgs s g ≤ 70 giv ( can π limited e there B 2 region ) ( erall − / parameters sho is soft are univ as resem is could hanging 3 v − yp B c teresting degeneracy: t o hanging uon wing µ γ c m for s in that + significan m the , the of sign or gaugino µ X increase wn and or v is ample large follo SUSY µ /π there v . (the to masses a the do its groups sign 4 not → fla ) y or → , , phenomenology scenario as fla ] ] b an µ The s 3, h ≤ θ θ on is , B e SUSY µ B the 2 es θ degrees ( b in a Another this , 0.86 this v feature sin sin Higgs 1 B either whic sign( ≤ hange onding Although gauge SM t c and in (a) to − − and e 4 ecified can found = . v detailed / Therefore θ θ for − remo and e i and sp π the SM µ ha wn b can een certain ossible , handle − salien is + SUSY µ cos cos p the 2 w 3 triangle. corresp , do all degenerate. µ one a ) ) SUSY µ a et 2 3 t the can GeV to M can a is SUSY µ =1 b from i sleptons ork Θ Θ → a 3 for are 8 . w oin w een Θ s symmetry all − filled remain 300 − − sfermion space: study p M 3 dels w case, µµ B the ho that 1 1 – unless 10 √ et , = in R to Θ Θ / this Both decrease I mo the b generations. × 32 0 Higgs , that y The this . and − − there y fact M in θ ) 2 +1 – m b 3 2 1 deviation particular, − ely or discrete from l = > correlations H F enough y brane + either hanges, ( three [(Θ [(Θ Still The l In ersalit i b parameter ) parameter scale the ]. s , e with D ectiv 2 2 − Θ ell assume the exc in / / X β en µ some effect premature can w en. 3 3 yp [63 of consider univ w t y correlation + denoted del fix o m m → wing Still resp e µ mass giv w µµ tan string is parameters. e ma to w sho 3 3 up this brok . ), B the R mo . the 2 2 come w 3 scalar e → osing γ , at of √ √ e kno follo is are 0 . s i 2 γ w b branes mSUGRA. del M s mSUGRA. the e s to time. one , , analysis it X = = = H p gluino and B b 21 imp w 2 case, X the ( of e mo d / masses u D ersal the → 3 21 hoice y the B A observ A and A due er c wn, → first derately the b m of del, SUGRA and v B in this analysis, in o ( hand, to sign B efore univ i 1 figure and mo couplings kno B b mo the as brane this set In Also a as H that is in on same, are gaugino the , D scan . scenario. 21 easy is are for for β and other 50. e 10 e dels, the on minimal same space b − w tributions the and scale ≤ del teractions µµ umerical AMSB ork tan dels trilinear n mo 10 the in β R w ersal are con masses phenomenological the mo figures the not doublets AMSB and t t × mo of the or e discussion tan (b) The F On In correlation scalar string large ending univ 32 in the this teractions. ould CNC limit) and Therefore eters: Earlier The presen the squark masses non the the unlik w Higgs parameter dep these curren for of to F in class within as and of JHEP03(2003)054 t t e − I, el or l b I all A re- er- for ers are ery the the the + and 1 b v l lev with ratio h s scale. as w SUSY the at 8 = can terfere enden cannot AMSB GMSB mainly w X um Univ Run − Another elo in ork n reject − larger mass b 2) whic hing negligible. prediction w 10 messenger µ ecause → thereafter. and the mess . the (and GUT b + ] t σ h − ratio , indep is × N B µ scenario g in ely ould atron , 67 uc vy masses 2 SM ( γ , the stop for , s 2.7 branc w the γ second m → ev s National ∼ hing If generated X hea T s its γ is it Higgs e presen with [66 tribution ectiv X s uon hanisms the SUSY µ b is B the ok to scenario → a m X scalar GMSB ely o ork. on con → the excluded the for branc resp w mec B ≡ for orks from (except around can wn → and B the scale. w − at the of op suppressed 10 to is , µ do µµ B ys, ersal − lo µ h this relativ on in limits AMSB + factories, scenarios R ratio prediction first µ tribution 10 Kyungp 2) uc de is ratio (WS). in ered B er the univ deca in v m features the × scale − at → w related definitely the con mo SM t at hing τ g s is mediation lo result in hand, on 7) e ( tributions . y hing mass tribution B b op GMSB messenger disco few ed conclusons the lo con a ortan new new is con branc predict 7(10 CHEP deca ratio the . ound stop other will the a hargino-stop the branc cesses − scale considered treated: b c that − 16 deviations and imp µ messenger the the observ µ of e hadronic breaking – the dels the its + er v ], that pro hing Higgs + mess are is suppressed µ the hargino w µ y 33 ery ha the affect N mo hargino [65 lo the v On through large fact, so), c µµ e – With to → → y finished, - also w branc R SUSY cation In or s hand, not s indicates the ect stop-c energy is lo messenger − harged and B in B ecause small c where KRF-2002-070-C00022 man µ for y ossibilit eing do b w stop OSEF w if oration t + p exp 2) b tributions the effects. also GeV induces . lo K lo the µ then the other ] ons a 6 the is dels to deca to y with the dels e particles. con ] b gran → data 10 scenarios Since t [68 case, on scenario. 9(11 four . s the mo still Collab ork mo hadr [67 ∼ 0 G an these and deviation B al. w scale, 33 This that prob is running 2) part new t this running > hance . On → Therefore SUSY = c et for GMSB − so mess ated. G SM relev PBR the that in µ in G this g ending 8 can − hadronic of R ( arious M mess y SM µ R − e GUT there ( ara This I v inspired vy a the y mediation N ts I + the the little dep 10 b wh e the motiv term considered small hes in − ratio. KRF orted the or hea t is × significan e While w y implies op and for Muon − A 2 ell alue. scenario. w Run y b scales Hagiw exp µ the ery µ lo ho with string v w a ely around searc v supp y + hing an reason b µ mess scale, or is on on there breaking is The tal and BNL If ely particular, than AMSB result M atron y → high parameter wledgmen the b 1. AMSB gluino branc relativ In w ork direct added. s ev t is the is w lo T is new = B (PK) A based h. messenger SUSY ending erimen Conclusions kno larger the conclusion, the the the constraining y uc µµ w orted e y of then p the particles), Note Ac This in 4. In and messenger the sit The dep The theoretically mSUGRA R in scale stop b destructiv with are b is lo parameter exp This scenario). calculation m JHEP03(2003)054 D J. SUSY µ , , 557 , a ept. 115 ev. c. o 1 ent R R B B al ar avity = c the ation (Pr ]; messengers ersymmetry the lo gr singlets al N ett. er as ansp Phys. Phys. L sup for Phys. of 101 , , by ; tr unific d SO(10) sup oken d ersymmetry eyond es e b br 366 ersymmetry gies fields 27 ]; without dynamic and ale Nucl. Phys. sup ough diate range Phys. , , gr sc sup physics gy of quenc σ induc thr d ously ]; 3 no mass gauge (1983) physics (1999) aking low-ener hep-ph/9909248 Nucl. oblem onse e [ to c diate ]. , the article pr ersymmetric aking aking br gauge-me at β p e e 217 ontane ad al 559 low-ener me w 036 o br obing br sup ]. sp r B chy gic tan B messenger pr Gaugino and with for ersymmetric in allo ar aking hep-ph/9507378 ge e ]. [ e The with the sup ols br (2000) hier w lar Phys. to Phys. avity ories Gaugino ly ]; as mass . hep-ph/9911293 if [ at ersymmetry gr dels 2658 07 al the c er I, oulos, The Rattazzi, o 215 ersymmetry ersymmetry I higher-dimensional New ton, sup mo Nucl. hep-ph/9911323 L – Nucl. [ avity ; Phenomenolo , sup quark R. and , on ersymmetry: sup Sup gr ctions Phys. P . 34 035010 (1999) e hep-ph/9306309 343 er 003 [ Run Nanop sup ersymmetry top 75 world – ells, the (1983) gy chies and E. Nath, Gauge orr 53 avity c ; . W , Massive Sup ar Rattazzi, hep-ph/9801271 of sup masses for [ y Shirman, gr P 7048 ]. this o D The D.V. 126 d Ener and hmaltz, (2000) ama er R. al v (1982) atron e (2000) ch hier hep-ph/9810442 y Y. 2359 erg, [ ton, of (1985) J.D. Sc 419 ]; B Sa and ev. ar ev b 62 sup ersymmetry, and on 01 R T and se ; 119 nalysis High adiative M. P ates and ein Sarid, 027 D (1994) r and Out 117 ett. Mura A Nelson Sup witt B L J. W C.A. ]; 970 E. (1983) oken the U. Dynamic (1999) , The 50 H. Nir ev. and Phys. . S. br Phys. gener ept. , R 1 ett. 27 at , y D Arno and A.E. R Y. Lahanas and (1998) Giudice ly L and gy eldon, , 322 Phys. Nilles, aking Giudice D y y al and anomaly-induc e (1982) , . R. Lut W Kane, hep-ph/0102029 ev. Kribs 12 avity [ Sundrum, Nelson, aking br Phys. R en Ener e ]. A.B. G.F. gr Lut Lut ept. ev. (1987) Phys. 49 , found G. errara H.P hep-ph/9303230 ersymmetric Phys. [ R. G.F. R R br with er , ories F example). 279 , Nelson, e H.A. M.A. G.D. see see A.E. Rattazzi b Phys. ; Sup see ett. del Lykk the S. 145 High and Dynamic Sup Phys. 1 M.A. M.A. L and for hep-th/9810155 ; 1277 , gy and J. R. [ to , Mo A.E. er Phys. Phys. J. o, o, and a , , , k ev. ept. k (2001) d 2 193 79 avity R R review, review, ersymmetry dimensions Chamseddine, Ener ation Kaplan, Hab Giudice, Logan, Nilles, gr Soni (1984) Hall, Hall, a reviews, a a . Dine, Dine (1993) ersymmetry ersymmetry ersymmetry er Barbieri, Gherghetta, Randall aking aking aking Chac Chac sup e e e enough or or or hep-ph/9904378 figure Phys. A.H. 150 H.E. (1982) R. 48 Standar High M. T. (1999) br sup unific Suppl.) Phys. G.F. F sup sup S.K. L.J. br sup [ D.E. br of extr Z. H.P L.J. M. H.E. L. F Z. F [2] [7] [3] [8] [4] [1] [5] [6] large (see References JHEP03(2003)054 2 86 and − ]; : om g − fr 93 (2002) ett. µ (2001) 3484 L Higgs 3 + minimal moment 88 µ 64 the of ev. muon the for in attering the ]. attering : ontribution R for → (2001) ]; D 2 2 c sc ett. µ sc s of (2001) on magnetic L magnetic (2002) ]; light-by-light ersymmetric chanisms − 2) and − magnetic B ev. ole g g 2 86 506 − p me R ev. sup magnetic 65 Phys. the light g 624 ]; 271801 − R , ]; hep-ph/0112117 ( and B [ ations in moment g messenger ett. of by B alar eriment L muon muon ches ett. Phys. and om the art (2001) L diation , anomalous exp Phys. anomalous ar of light-by-light p ev. (2002) fr light anomalous Implic − events the , R se 071803 µ Phys. me hep-ph/0112255 [ anomalous hep-ph/0102147 ole + moment to 89 821 508 [ ach magnetic p pseudosc obing onic µ E o hep-ph/0103280 onic Phys. muon muon [ B ations , 410 ]. ole Pr moment ett. → Phys. masses Nucl. aking eiglein, the matter L . e (2002) hadr rilepton , om 5004 s , the muon del appr the hep-ph/0111058 dip ctions Hadr W ett. [ hep-ph/0102146 T fr br of e B [ to L anomalous of of 88 ev. mo Implic ctly the Song, G. e 035004 ory of dark R orr (2002) d c article the anomalous sign act esult dir (2001) ett. 3480 the on enarios in sp r magnetic ang, SUSY L Rafael, and Phys. 073034 sc . 626 ations W.Y. , the – W magnetic 86 Imp hardson, and on Phys. . (2001) ent on Combining de and elation Su ev. field B c standar muon e on R 35 Ric e, ontribution (2001) 2), and ett. S. hep-ph/0103067 E. 64 artners R ata, . c aking [ of – (2002) L Implic e L.-T. 251804 hep-ph/0207026 T P Corr − limits ctive D 86 Comment , er, erp liders hi, Oliv g ations CMSSM Phys. light-by-light ole Lee anomalous and ( 65 ev. X. p ol Phys. er ; and c effe and R sup ev. , on? anomalous ett. D the ations R 035003 L ersymmetry (2001) at K.A. onic Upp Comment and an K.Y. Implic Nucl. Lennon, SUSY-br Nierste, Pion muon on muon ersymmetric ev. amaguc Prades, : evatr ev. 87 ]; Sup 2 2, Phys. R Y errottet Heinemey T v, hep-ph/0108122 U. and R Muon Implic J. Rigolin Hadr , Nierste sup o P Phys. the soft overing moment the − − , J.E. (2001) SUSY S. Nath, , Song, M. ett. Kang, g g aints S. the ]; ]. hev, . U. L by M. and errandis of and ells, disc ent P 64 Phys. and and oulos F dels at Phys. , W Kinoshita, and matter Melnik ev. , S.K. te, onstr − D for J. Matc W.Y. c mo R hep-ph/0112102 muon muon µ and Dedes, minimal Kane, Nyffeler, T. Gondolo, aking differ K. overy magnetic + e ]; ]. ]; ]. ]; y . d ev. 2, J.D. µ dark a Nanop Kolda A. Dreiner, Dreiner allan P A. ang, br and ersymmetry the the and R muon on Nyffeler, y Moroi − K.T. P and disc other G.L. and → Phys. hep-ph/0102157 g aine to to sup Hw [ a and Balazs, A. s T. Ko , the MSUGRA E. and and ki C.F. w ontribution D.V. for H.K. H.K. . ches and B c t, t a K. C. Phys. P with for of h h hep-ph/0111059 hep-ph/0103048 ar onstr for , erett, [ [ ak 5854 avity muon ersymmetric anomalous y se brosanio, ole eng Baltz gr Ellis, Ev Martin F unc Ha Byrne, Knec Knec sup . ersymmetry ersymmetric ersymmetry er Choi, Chattopadh Dedes, Dedes, Baer, Czarnec ories the Komine, Baek, Am Bijnens, ossibility ontribution oson ontribution hep-ph/0102204 hep-ph/0205259 hep-ph/0102331 hep-ph/0106255 hep-ph/0102145 S. 071802 and (2001) no-lose p M. J.R. c [ A. observing to sup [ moment on U. muon A. M. 055001 [ J. M. moment sup sup b sup pion-p J.L. [ the [ c E.A. moment S. A. L.L. S. K. M. H. S.P [9] [10] [13] [14] [11] [15] [12] [16] JHEP03(2003)054 , 5 5 , of of , of k 414; 338 ² K sγ Phys. July , , the → B for (1999) (1999) 51 and dings and b del Phys. ]. ading e in 7 7 gies (1998) e , − for (2001) muon le B c 2 ]. ` mo ay ersymmetry ]. (1998) ett. alculation alculation the o C C c + c c del L − in ctrum ` Ener e Pr de of 425 sup s J. J. 58 g 611 mo ctive sp ev. 488 X eyond ations B in ositive d D B R b the QCD QCD p doublet esses gy effe → High c 429. o Phys. Phys. to ay muon ev. ays B c ibid. c diate at the R element pr implic om ener (2001) inclusive ]; to Phys. de Phys. NLO NLO de fr of on , hep-ph/9804294 Eur. Eur. [ − ent (2001) and the , , ` hep-ex/0111037 the the hep-ex/0102017 611 [ [ Phys. + ]; two-Higgs tributed Nucl. ` to actions matrix , ays ays curr photon erratum B s a gauge-me , c c 513 ement matrix phases ]. ], γ X con del op moment al B-meson s de de 2967 094006 in 2227 ]. , B MSSM Inter and X ontribution γ γ → asur mo − c ctions s s Phys. e τ d B → neutr X X me + ibid. esults Completing Two-lo Completing minimal ¯ τ orr hep-ph/0112163 r (2002) (1998) B (2001) [ s c → → adiative action a diate Photon r magnetic Nucl. ) cise ]; X fr in violating B B 17 e 58 ]; s 86 , ]; 117 – CP-violating α ak for estrini, γ hep-ph/0203135 → exchange [ Pr ( of of s A D and cts Urban, Urban, Urban, ]; changing erratum O . ett. physics B 36 X ayashi-Maskawa We hep-ph/0203135 hep-ph/9612313 Silv [ L [ J. J. J. ], al., flavor effe ev. 219 – B hep-ph/0105200 stau → [ gauge-me anching R L. (2002) Kob et Phys. signals epton ev. le 219 B 206 anomalous and and and Br L R Flavor 251807 The 683 d. anatomy anatomy Munz, Virtual gy mass the Huang, wn and Bel 529 ay (2002) on c al., Phys. ersymmetric . Mo of minimal M. , B hep-ph/9906286 Bro de [ minimal Muon (2002) et hep-ph/9603404 Phys. (1997) d [ J. sup Misiak Misiak hep-ph/9904283 Misiak QCD QCD (2001) 631 jima, [ del , a (2001) Quark H.-W. Wyler, a ow-ener Hisano, ett. and the of Shimizu, osium hep-ph/9707546 120 B T L L M. M. M. [ ark, of mo 95 H.N. 631 87 Scimemi 400 Int. ert, ert, 21 J. ]. in D. P 3350 Chen hep-ph/9607389 [ Y. and cts I. H. B gy ki, ki, ki, B C Extende S. ett. Symp moment 4752 and avity L Misiak, and Misiak Phys. Neub Neub Phys. Italy ator J. 257 J.H. Sarid, Effe (2000) and ametrization ett. (1999) , gr er L (1996) oration, ]; ]. ]. ]; Phys. M. ev. M. er M. M. U. Huang hep-ph/0203251 op Par Ko, and R ada Czarnec Czarnec Czarnec 568 oration, , Haba Masiero, 462 54 Nucl. Lunghi, . (1997) Hurth Phys. sup oration, Rome, , (1997) P and Ok and and B and A. A. ent A. Ko collab . B N. Phys. γ D magnetic A. E. solution C.-S. Nucl. T. s 79 phenomenolo . yrkin, , the , Y. Phys. P collab X Eur. and γ hep-ph/9803451 390 International ev. , collab [ ett. bino g-2 s 2001, 1945 in , and ett. R L Cho, Dai, Phys. → Chet sγ X B L Kagan Kagan olfenstein, Buras, Buras, Buras, ent-curr XX B ersymmetry Ali Greub, Goto, ays oupling Lunghi, Gabrielli W Gam Baek, Baek → → c c garithms ev. . ett. hep-ph/0104034 hep-ph/9805303 hep-ph/9805303 hep-ph/0105160 ¯ the de K.G. [ lo physics 23–28, L C. [ Imminent A. Nucl. [ (1983) R anomalous sup Phys. E. 115003 Phys. P bar curr [ B B A.J. A.J. S. de T. E. Y.-B. BELLE A.J. CLEO A.L. L. A.L. Muon S. G.-C. [26] [27] [25] [21] [24] [22] [20] [19] [23] [17] [28] [18] JHEP03(2003)054 , , − − ` the on 63 414; µ + . ay 8 ` 88 + c in + in s D µ ge MSSM 021801 de evatr (2000) C Phys. X − garithms T , τ lar ¯ tbH → ading (1999) ev. J. lo (1998) + → 61 0 le the R ontributions and and ]. τ (2000) c 121 the s 59 the B 059902; − /S D in with (2002) ersymmetric ` X 425 at B ]; D a + ay Phys. ading 577 for ` c ays ev. sup Phys. oson 88 eyond → B − le c asymmetries b ctr dels R 2HDM , µ K de B ev. e (2002) and B de (2001) + ersymmetry hep-ph/0212220 R al sp ay mo Eur. ett. µ → − , CP c ibid. in L , µ 074014 sup the 64 angian 538 eyond B de Higgs-b on → Phys. + b MSSM Phys. , s ev. µ enguin gener of and D B al Phys. p − lagr ]; R B SUSY hep-ph/9902355 ays a , e distinguish [ hadr MSSM the → c . − + ak ameters (2001) of ett. in ories 0 e in erratum to µ de Nucl. in ibid. in neutr L hep-ph/9501281 atios study ar minimal [ + , s ctive r ], e − p the B-meson − owe 3811 64 /D Phys. µ asymmetry ` of X ay gy ess s ar µ in , c B + c r 115004 ction ctr Effe + ` 186 D o − X − → ative de meson inclusive µ Phys. µ ]; pr µ ele s , s CKM → the ar + ays → B + erratum ev. + e c Dete X (1998) µ s anching B µ the µ R nalysis ], adiative B ac the de − B r br (1999) a, K for the agner, A for omp → (1995) of 57 µ of hep-ph/9807418 sp c → [ olarisation u, W – of of ak → B ch for 0 p the 60 ersymmetric del: ay D A 52 → omising phenomenolo anak c Phys. Zh B e ar τ B 37 We ]. T pr D , hep-ph/9612313 mo sup D de for ofiles 0 d d,s [ Se and ev. − – aisal Urban, ay d ` B pr R ameter 034017 c M. ev. − ch + C.E.M. ev. Higgs J. The S.-H. Hiller, al., ar and µ ` 206 a, R de al diate Gaur, ar R p appr hep-ph/9810307 d Evidenc + hamiltonian Munz, [ e K et and G. r µ Se gic ge an, del and N. and wsk and . the Phys. hep-ph/0006250 standar Y 86 → [ al., (1999) M. ]. al , → ert determination mo Phys. Dileptonic al., of Phys. (1997) an and ctive s char B SUSY , et and eV the d , 60 Y ]. etic B o β et Higgs-me wiano e T and Aub Q.-S. Kamon and or Effe e 8 Nierste the Kruger D 400 hep-ph/9909476 u, . and and (1999) om [ ]. ]. Sla Ab 114021 tan 1 − Gaur, B. the fr T. W ` Ab − F. B U. Q.-S. on and ev. Gupta ` L. = + standar ge K. β Phenomenolo A N. schemes ` 228 R 451 + Handok Kolda, s F. Misiak ) ` Munz, A. s lar ett. in √ MSSM Observation B tan , erth, L and (2001) ]. ]; ]. ]. X.-H. Liao Liao, X aints M. → HV ; and − hep-ex/0107026 Dutta, , M. at ` oration, L.T. C.F. hep-ph/0008046 , s d Garcia, ge [ ury Ew Phys. Hiller, Hiller, the 63 + with ¯ ett. (2000) − W. W. B B. X ` oration, , and ` ury L wski and ( ) lar onstr D. oration, hep-ph/9812267 − T. Phys. o in and D ∗ + G. G. c [ and ` 84 yrkin, ` Ball, , collab dels ays → K + . lisions c ` , hep-ph/9803460 hep-ph/9910221 witt, ev. [ [ 892 P with collab s eth, 619 054012 B and Choudh and and ol mo NDR de Phys. ett. K R collab c Huang Huang, Huang, Chet X ( K L Chank , Babu Choudh Buras action II ¯ p β Carena, Ali Ali Ali, Arno ays Bob dels the p the Rai → → → c garithms ev. .H. hep-ph/0203069 hep-ex/0109026 hep-ph/0104284 hep-ph/9912516 run in [ mo 011701 K.G. lo tan B SUSY A. B de A. BABAR Phys. S. [ B C.-S. 074024 to R hep-ex/0107072 (1999) [ in [ inter (2001) R. A.J. C.-S. S.R. A. C.-S. K.S. Belle CDF M. P C. [33] [29] [34] [35] [31] [37] [36] [30] [32] [40] [38] [39] JHEP03(2003)054 , in J. ]. 09 D , J. , ]. , ement ]; MSSM ge SUSY ]. ev. of om Phys. 015012 063 magnetic limit R , fr ory ory diation High Phys. lar in dilaton the asur erratum β ] J. me − at diation gy del of ` me , ]. the ations + tan e M-the Phys. (2002) (2000) ` mo fcnc masses , ac by Ener the ge- d new aviolet-insensitive → 09 62 sp and l hep-ph/0209306 anomalous implic lar [ of for avity anomaly anomaly string/M-the K D ultr aking diate High hep-ph/0103182 e al aking gr [ hep-ph/9507294 hep-ph/9601357 e [ the anomaly-me gaugino [ 095004 br ]. ersymmetry er Phys. J. ev. om gic string light br 3 and d ameter muon , in R fr terms 224 59 viable sup 015012 gy sup of ar − Viable hep-ph/9308271 cte [ ` p the the hep-ph/0012103 in + [ onformal SUSY Higgs-me ents (2000) soft ` c in Ener (1996) − aking Phys. the ura, defle diation 125 ` e er of , (2001) (1996) and → (2003) 61 for ]. 041 + curr br of me ` on ]; viability minimal sup world 471 sγ s,d D Nom High dels ersymmetry al phenomenolo 67 ory non-universal ]. gy 507 380 → al B enarios B (1994) → the J. mo the Y. D the sup hep-ph/9607465 ev. ]; ]. ane B B aints [ sc , gic b 0 s,d (2001) angian SUSY R a neutr with on B Br ev. om of for four-dimensional 422 anomaly and ale 02 ett. ett. lagr ds R fr Phys. – ]. ]; onstr aking L L 6944 d on c B e ely world mixing Phys. ]; aints br 38 ama enario , owar study cts No-sc ctive ersymmetry: y hep-ph/9810266 Phys. – ong Pur Phenomenolo T oblems sc Nucl. Phys. [ d ane Phys. hep-ph/0208142 Phys. Thomas, , , masses [ Phys. effe (1996) hi, sup Pr , effe , gy Str Phenomenolo Br 67 hep-ph/0204122 aking ale S. [ Constr flavour ells, e d Mura ˜ noz, al ]; 54 hep-ph/0110121 hep-th/0201256 br W [ [ of ˜ noz, Pierce, Ener ˜ noz, H. ˜ noz, aking Nucl. Mu 034 flavour-changing MSSM D e article Combine minima No-sc , 016005 es amaguc ersymmetry (1999) A. Gaugino-assiste moment c Mu br 001 036 Mu C. Mu Sp Y hep-ph/9912390 hep-ph/9903448 J.D. ]. [ ev. [ del ernatur esumme hi, High alar sup Castano, R Oh, C. 3 Graesser, C. hep-ph/0007327 R C. [ M. sour and mo 554 Sc (2002) d aking CP-violation olor ] J. and Sup and e 013 S. c Kaplan, (2003) D. , d M. Kribs, B (2001) (2002) and br and [12 08 and ersymmetry and ˜ nez ama Phys. 67 diate amaguc magnetic and and a (2000) y Rattazzi, 747; and , 11 03 CP-violating Y D.E. Nath, hep-th/0111235 sup 035005 aking [ D olor Ib´ and Retico, G.D. Moroi, e ]; ]. ]. . (1999) Pilaftsis, Dine, ge c R. d Phys. ] standar P Strumia Phys. br M. the Lleyda Ibarra 576 Lleyda Moroi A. T. Mura ev. A. 05 vacua M. [11 and Phys. Phys. gy A. char L.E. R Brhlik (1995) and in non-minimal B thappa and A. A. A. diate hep-ph/0009195 d T. and gauge-me (2001) H. [ v, and Nucl. 105011 and gy gy and and ge M. , anomalous om in refs. Ener 63 436 Phys. with fr 048 ani-Hamed, Phys. Phys. eng Ener Ener Mahan char Kaplan D B , Casas, Casas, Casas, gy actions F omarol also β (2002) ersymmetric ersymmetry Isidori Dedes Baer, Anisimo P Brignole, Ark Rattazzi, Harnik, Ibrahim dels High muon Komine, Komine enarios ev. om hep-ph/9907319 hep-ph/0208159 hep-ph/9908531 J. High 65 High R Nucl. inter mo A. S. fr R. See Ener [ [ sup anomaly-me ibid. tan [ (2000) sc sup moment of non-standar H. strings S. R. A. G. J.A. D.E. T. A. K.T. A. J.A. J.L. N. J.A. [50] [49] [48] [41] [43] [52] [42] [51] [46] [54] [44] [47] [53] [45] JHEP03(2003)054 D in 08 of ane Nucl. terms low muon ev. (2001) Phys. matter , R , dilaton Phys. a 2 D-br terms , ]. om and Phys. Z ]. anomalous 603 manifold 026 fr / aking dark A d ersymmetry 1 e [56 al a 035004 ]; gy references ]; B Phys. soft anomalous anes S br aking, gic , sup e and on ref. muon on br dimensions and Ener (2000) γ evisite and and matter , r s ]. 393 esult Phys. Determination (2002) five-br Muon r oken X SUSY also ory 12 avity singularities: ale 2 br High 65 gr dark avity → sc ositive SUSY eleven see at − with p soft er gr Nucl. J. D B (2000) µ ]; M-the , hep-ex/0208001 , Phys. er g with ouplings phenomenolo [ in om sup c Soft ory the te-Lujan, 18 fr in diate hep-ph/0001083 ev. anes te-Lujan, del ]. hep-th/9909172 [ gy sup [ its R of dels C mo ations ales, D-br issues 015 M-the orren d ]; 031 mo J. Ener orren and 101804 Klein, moment, hep-ph/0004064 hep-ph/9508258 Sc T ctive ]; okhaven [ T ersymmetric , interme o Phys. ement u, , implic E. M. otic br ory effe dynamics E. sup ory an High 157 Some d-like Phys. Zh (2000) (2000) standar ondensation (2002) asur Uranga, on J. c h, hep-ph/0104242 and and new heter [ and , 02 M-the with magnetic 01 Me 89 M-the the string matter S.H. Eur. of – hep-th/9603142 heic ˜ nez the (1997) [ , ˜ ˜ noz noz, dels Eleven-dimensional a of A.M. Standar aints 2 ]. al., Sc gy e-I otic 39 ett. domination and ]; Z Ib´ 94 and 74 Phys. L mo dark 093012 / ]. Mu Mu Phys. hep-th/9711158 – et C. Gaugino [ typ 1 and eting enarios L. edo, C onstr an S gy heter C. C. gy c ev. dding sc Y astro-ph/0207673 e and [ our-dimensional R anomalous d and string and ]; on edo F dilaton string (1996) 7521 om edo, (2001) Quev Ener Ener of emb fr ove Interpr Bennett aldram, ˜ noz Physik Q.-S. otic ale ory F. 64 Khalil, Khalil, ˜ noz, 475 Quev Phys. ; Phenomenolo with W Muon sc Quev 063503 enarios Z. , ]. Mu High Impr S. S. High D (1998) limit B avity , F. sc Mu D. and string hep-ph/0206299 F. Nath, Heter [ G.W. Liao, J. M-the dels C. gr hep-th/9510209 ˜ J. noz, gy [ . Lee, ppm 57 ersymmetric , ev. hep-th/9711197 C. diate , h, [ er P the in R ane ˜ ˜ mo nez, nez ctors and W. (2003) Mu D ]. a a Phys. sup 0.7 ˜ nez, 506 se sup to gy H.S. a and Ib´ Ib´ and C. Li, 67 hep-ph/0208012 in to Gondolo, 115007 7529 D-br vacua ev. Gabrielli, Gabrielli, [ MSSM Witten, Ib´ oration, ]. ]. ]. y . low-ener Phys. R interme Allanac string duli a ach D P in Ovrut and Nucl. , E. E. ctive y o E. Kim and L.E. L.E. the , (1996) T.-j. hep-th/9906152 L.E. the ev. ale and The hep-th/0005067 , string Ko collab (2002) (1998) and to [ Effe B.C. R appr 093001 and . Phys. B.A. sc moment moment in H.B. 460 P , a e-I 66 57 el, v g-2 phenomenolo 002 as, ˜ noz, B ations oundary ory Huang, ra Cerdeno Cerdeno, Cerdeno, ˇ typ dilaton/mo Baltz D D Nilles, Ab b hep-ph/0102270 Phys. gy [ ction string . (2002) Aldazabal, Aldazabal, Choi, Luk Chattopadh Brignole, Mu , Ho Baek, ev. ev. om om . ottom-up hep-ph/9810412 hep-ph/0103218 hep-ph/0005260 R 66 magnetic g-2 magnetic nonuniversality therein. A. H.P U. ener R Phys. [ b M-the 231 alternative fr the implic G. fr [ (2000) dete with A. domination [ E.A. C.-S. K. D.G. D.G. G. Muon S.A. P C. D.G. S. [66] [61] [59] [60] [64] [62] [65] [55] [57] [58] [63] [56] JHEP03(2003)054 . − e + the e of magnetic d on new om 2 B fr − of g ]. ]; and limits act of hep-ph/0208177 s , B anomalous imp functions of lower al diction and e ays muon moment and ctr c pr e de er sp the ction hep-ph/0208078 SM [ se hep-ph/0208069 of [ Upp oss The magnetic onting 034 leptonic cr ]. 115003 d ations Austri, Confr muon (2002) de diate eubner, implic T attering (2002) – the ; 12 d sc T. Ruiz 66 40 Zhang, for date – R. D Z. es and Higgs-me Phys. Up endent hep-ph/0209187 ev. [ gy and and ura R ang, quenc 69 er W k Ener c Nom wski onse Lennon, o Y. c Phys. hep-ph/0208067 Ho D. , , spin-indep (2003) High J.E. and A. ays: Roszk J. c and , 557 de ata L. and T Martin, B mass X. ement ersymmetry ersymmetry ett. Nihei, Eidelman, A.D. Kolda L and sup sup asur S. T. oshi, C. wimp of ara, me for es Phys. µ vier, , Kim, alino Mizuk ob 2) Byrne, Da Hagiw pr − g as M. neutr J.K. muon Y.G. moment ( M. K. [67] [68]