DOCSLIB.ORG

Department of Health

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Department of Health DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH DEPARTMENT Department of Health DEPARTMENTAL REPORT REPORT DEPARTMENTAL The Government’s Expenditure Plans 2001-2002 to 2003-2004 and Main Estimates 2001-2002 Published by The Stationery Office Limited and available from: 2001 The Publications Centre (mail, telephone and fax orders only) PO Box 29, Norwich NR3 1GN General enquiries 0870 600 55 22 Order through the Parliamentary Hotline Lo-call 0845 7 02 34 74 Fax orders 0870 600 55 33 E-mail [email protected] Internet http://www.ukstale.com The Stationery Office Bookshops 123 Kingsway, London WC2B 6PQ 020 7242 6393 Fax 020 7242 6394 68-69 Bull Street, Birmingham B4 6AD The Stationery Office 0121 236 9696 Fax 0121 236 9699 33 Wine Street, Bristol BS1 2BQ 0117 926 4306 Fax 0117 929 4515 9-21 Princess Street, Manchester M60 8AS 0161 834 7201 Fax 0161 833 0634 16 Arthur Street, Belfast BT1 4GD 028 9023 8451 Fax 028 9023 5401 The Stationery Office Oriel Bookshop 18-19 High Street, Cardiff CF1 2BZ 029 2039 5548 Fax 029 2039 4347 71 Lothian Road, Edinburgh EH3 9AZ 0870 606 5566 Fax 0870 606 5588 The Parliamentary Bookshop 12 Bridge Street, Parliament Square London SW1A 2JX Telephone orders 020 7219 3890 General enquiries 020 7219 3890 Fax orders 020 7219 3866 Departmental Report Accredited Agents (see Yellow Pages) The Health and Personal and through good booksellers Social Services Programmes This is part of a series of departmental reports (Cm 5102 to 5123) accompanied by the document Public Expenditure: Statistical Analysis, 2000–2001 (Cm 5101), which present the Government’s expenditure plans for 2001–2002 to 2003–2004. The complete series is also available as a set at a discounted price. © Crown Copyright 2001 The text in this document may be reproduced free of charge in any format or media without requiring specific permission. This is subject to the material not being used in a derogatory manner or in a misleading context. The source of the material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the document must be included when being reproduced as part of another publication or service. Any enquiries relating to the copyright in this document should be addressed to Printed in the UK for The Stationery Office Limited on behalf of the HMSO, The Copyright Unit, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ. Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Fax: 01603 723000 or e-mail: [email protected]. Dd 5069864 3/01 1374 TJ003902 This is part of a series of departmental reports (Cm 5102 to 5123) accompanied by the document Public Expenditure: Statistical Analysis, 2000–2001 (Cm 5101), which present the Government’s expenditure plans for 2001–2002 to 2003–2004. The complete series is also available as a set at a discounted price. © Crown Copyright 2001 The text in this document may be reproduced free of charge in any format or media without requiring specific permission. This is subject to the material not being used in a derogatory manner or in a misleading context. The source of the material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the document must be included when being reproduced as part of another publication or service. Any enquiries relating to the copyright in this document should be addressed to Printed in the UK for The Stationery Office Limited on behalf of the HMSO, The Copyright Unit, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ. Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Fax: 01603 723000 or e-mail: [email protected]. Dd 5069864 3/01 1374 TJ003902 The Government’s Expenditure Plans 2001-2002 to 2003-2004 and Main Estimates 2001-2002 Department of Health DEPARTMENTAL REPORT Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Health and the Chief Secretary to the Treasury by Command of Her Majesty March 2001 Cm 5103 £18.50 Contents Page Foreword by the Secretary Of State 1 Ministerial Responsibilities 3 Structure of the Department of Health 5 Chapter 1: Introduction 7 Chapter 2: Delivering Better Public Services – Progress 9 Chapter 3: Expenditure Plans 21 Chapter 4: Investment 33 Chapter 5: The NHS Plan – a Plan for Investment, A Plan for Reform 39 Chapter 6: Breakdown of Spending Programme 45 Chapter 7: Activity, Performance and Efficiency 53 Chapter 8: Managing the Department of Health 71 List of Annexes 75 Bibliography 115 List of Figures 119 Glossary 121 Full Contents List 125 The purpose of this report is to present to Parliament and the Public a clear and informative account of the expenditure and activities of the Department of Health. This report and those of 1998, 1999 and 2000 are available on the Internet at http://www.doh.gov.uk/dohreport/ The Department of Health also has a Public Enquiry Office which deals with general queries, 0207 210 4850. Foreword by the Secretary of State It gives me great pleasure to present the eleventh annual report of the Department of Health. In the past, the debate about health and social care focused on resources, or the lack of them. Not any more. The March 2000 budget set out the largest level of sustained real terms growth over any four year period in NHS history. Since then, the NHS has received a further £120 million from the Treasury Capital Modernisation Fund (TCMF) for investment in coronary heart disease – £50 million in 2000-2001 and £70 million in 2001-2002. In the budget of 7th March 2001, the Chancellor announced further resources for the NHS in England: on average an extra £275 million per year for the next three years. This means that the annual average real terms increase in NHS expenditure is now 6.6 per cent (compared to the 6.3 per cent announced in the 2000 budget). During the period 1999-2000 to 2003-2004, government expenditure on the NHS will have risen by over 50 per cent to £57 billion (over 37 per cent in real terms). Now the questions about funding have been answered it is time to concentrate on the real issue – delivering better health, and faster, fairer more convenient services. Reforming the way the health service works, so that in future, the patient is at the centre of everything we do. In July 2000, after extensive consultation, we published the NHS Plan – a ten year programme for reform. The Plan sets out exactly how we will deliver a health service fit for the 21st century. How we are investing in 7,000 extra beds over the next few years and 100 new hospital schemes over the next decade. And investing in nearly 10,000 more consultants and GPs, 20,000 more nurses and 6,500 other health professionals over the next four years. Increasing capacity is vital, but on its own it is not enough. We also have to change the way the NHS works, to make the most effective use of these extra resources. We have to drive up standards, so that everyone can expect the same high quality of care. And we have to release the full potential of NHS staff, who have been instrumental in drawing up the Plan, and who are among the most effective advocates for change. That is why the NHS Plan introduces a new Modernisation Agency to spread best practice, and a National Performance Fund worth £500 million by 2003-04, to raise standards across the NHS. In future there will be a system of inspection and accountability for all parts of the NHS. The best performers will be given greater autonomy to use their share of the performance fund, and those who need more time will receive assistance from the Modernisation Agency. Nurses and other health professionals will be given the bigger roles that their qualifications and expertise deserve. We are cutting waiting times for treatment, expanding cancer screening programmes, and giving patients greater choice and new protection, for example against delays caused by cancelled operations. In future we want to see closer working between health and social services. We will support this with an extra £900 million investment in intermediate care by 2003-04, and new Care Trusts, combining health and social services. And we want to provide dignity, security and independence in old age including higher standards of care for older people and a new Care Direct Service. Taken together, these and the other changes outlined in the NHS Plan represent an unprecedented opportunity to transform not just the quantity of care available, but also the quality. The standards we have set are challenging, but we are confident they can be delivered, because the Plan will be implemented in the same inclusive way it was drawn up – with the active involvement of NHS staff, patients’ representatives, and other experts. As I write this foreword, the legislation required to enable many of the Plan’s key reforms is going through Parliament. The last year has proved that there is universal support within the NHS for our overall aim: to reshape the NHS from the patient’s point of view. This Departmental report is an early account of some of the progress we are making. Rt Hon Alan Milburn MP Secretary of State for Health 1 Introduction 2 Ministerial Responsibilities Secretary of State: The Right Honourable Alan Milburn MP Overall responsibility for the work of the Department of Health; Individual responsibility for NHS finance; NHS resource allocation; NHS central budgets; Performance monitoring; Management costs & NHS efficiency; PFI & NHS capital; NHS Estates; Strategic communications; sponsorship including health exports. Minister of State for Health, MS (H): John Denham MP Responsibility for: NHS strategy and planning; Waiting lists and times; Clinical quality inc NICE, CHI; Primary Care; Human resources in the NHS; NHS pay and conditions; Medical training and education; Medical workforce planning; Regional NHS casework for London.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Choice-Based Secondary School Admissions in England: Social Stratification and the Distribution of Educational Outcomes
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UCL Discovery Choice-Based Secondary School Admissions in England: Social Stratification and the Distribution of Educational Outcomes Rebecca Frances Allen Institute of Education, University of London PhD Thesis November 2008 I hereby declare that, except where explicit attribution is made, the work presented in this thesis is entirely my own. Word count (exclusive of appendices, list of references and bibliography): 73,205 words Abstract This thesis uses the cohort of 2005 school-leavers in the National Pupil Database to present an economic analysis of the effects of secondary school admissions in England on pupil sorting and achievement. The first part of the thesis exploits the availability of pupil postcodes to examine the impact of current school admissions arrangements on residential and school stratifica- tion. It produces data from a thought experiment whereby pupils currently in schools are reallocated to a new school based strictly on proximity to school. Through this simulation the role of the housing market in producing socially stratified schooling can be identified. A survey of school admissions policies is used to show that religious (and to a lesser extent Foundation) schools have intakes that are significantly more advan- taged than their local neighbourhood, and that they achieve these intakes through the use of explicit potentially selective admissions criteria. The second part of the thesis adds to evidence on whether policies intended to increase parental choice raise pupil achievement via competition between schools. Quantitative evidence on school competition in England is evaluated alongside the existing interna- tional literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Who's Progressive Now?
    Who’s progressive now? Greg Clark MP Jeremy Hunt MP Who’s progressive now? Greg Clark MP Jeremy Hunt MP 1 Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank Peter Franklin, Joanna Garner, Adam Smith and David O’Leary for their help in preparing this booklet. 2 Chapter 1: Progressive politics Introduction – whatever happened to the ‘Progressive Consensus’? During the last five years, Gordon Brown and his retinue of younger advisers have been on a quest – to define a political project that will in turn define his premiership. It has proved to be an arid task. Smith Institute seminars in 11 Downing Street have cast around in vain for a purpose that could be described coherently, let alone one that could be said to define the Brown vision. In the end, the task has been abandoned. Three events in the space of three weeks signalled the emptiness of Labour’s intellectual larder. First - the new Prime Minister’s barren conference speech in Brighton in September revealed that the preceding groundwork of seminars, symposia and speeches had offered up nothing usable. Next, the cancellation of the expected election, which was explained as allowing the Prime Minister another two years to set out his vision, was in fact a recognition that there was no vision to set out that would survive the scrutiny of an election campaign. Then came the intellectual surrender of the following week, in which Conservative reforms to inheritance tax set the agenda for what was, in effect, the first Budget of the Brown premiership. With no new idea that did not come from the Opposition, Alistair Darling’s statement signalled the end of the new regime’s ambition to forge an agenda of its own.
    [Show full text]
  • Are Current Levels of Air Pollution in England Too High? the Impact of Pollution on Population Mortality
    Are current levels of air pollution in England too high? The impact of pollution on population mortality Katharina Janke, Carol Propper and John Henderson Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................... 1 2. Background ................................................................................................................ 2 3. Our empirical approach ............................................................................................... 6 4. Data ........................................................................................................................... 7 5. Results ..................................................................................................................... 13 6. Robustness checks .................................................................................................... 23 7. Conclusions ............................................................................................................. 28 References ...................................................................................................................... 31 Appendix A: Current air quality standards ........................................................................ 34 Appendix B: Data sources ............................................................................................... 34 CASE/128 Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion (CASE) December 2007 London School of Economics Houghton Street London
    [Show full text]
  • Alan Milburn Interviewed the Real Reason for the Misery of Work
    PovertyJournal of the Child Poverty Action Group • Issue 147 • Winter 2014 Alan Milburn interviewed The real reason for the misery of work assessments How can we reduce child poverty without improving its prevention? Policy publications and CPAG briefings and reports from CPAG consultation responses The following reports can all be downloaded from Read these and more consultation responses and www.cpag.org.uk/policy-reports briefings at www.cpag.org.uk/briefings-responses Independent Review of JSA Sanctions: CPAG’s Let’s All Have Lunch! , September 2013 response , January 2014 Childcare and Maternal Employment in Submission to the Work and Pensions Committee London , September 2013 Inquiry into Housing Costs Support , October 2013 The Cost of a Child in 2013 , August 2013 Submission to the ‘Tax-free Childcare’ Will Universal Credit Work? Consultation , October 2013 Written by CPAG for the TUC, May 2013 Localisation of the Social Fund: countdown to The Double Lockout: how low-income families change , March 2013 will be locked out of fair living standards, January CPAG’s Response to the Child Poverty 2013 Measurement Consultation , February 2013 Ending Child Poverty by 2020 Judicial Review: proposals for reform. CPAG’s Progress made and lessons learned response to the Ministry of Justice consultation, Edited by Lindsay Judge January 2013 96 pages 978 1 906076 82 5 2012 £10.00 CPAG Briefing on Welfare Benefits Uprating Bill, Young People’s Thoughts on Child Poverty January 2013 Policy , December 2012 CPAG Briefing for Autumn Statement 2012, December 2012 We Can Work It Out: parental employment in London , November 2012 Food Poverty in London , October 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Teenage Pregnancy Policy in England
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by e-Prints Soton Sexuality Research & Social Policy Journal of NSRC http://nsrc.sfsu.edu September 2005 Vol. 2, No. 3 Teenage Pregnancy Policy in England Roger Ingham Abstract: This article provides an account of the development and early stages of the implementation of the teenage pregnancy policy introduced in England in 1999 (Social Exclusion Unit). The historical background of the policy is briefly outlined, followed by summaries of the processes involved, some of the key data that were drawn upon in its development, the content of the policy, evaluation data, critiques, and concluding comments. The policy is shown to have been based within a wider frame- work of attempts to reduce the number of young people who were thought to become socially excluded from society as a result of early childbearing. Emphasis in the policy was placed on both improved prevention of early conceptions through comprehensive sex and relationships education, improved ser- vices, and more open communication between parents and children and through improved support for those women who choose to have children in their teenage years. Key words: teen pregnancy; sexual health; policy development; young parents This article outlines the development and imple- HIV/AIDS campaign—involving extensive media adver- mentation of the teenage pregnancy policy (Social tising and an information leaflet distributed to all house- Exclusion Unit [SEU], 1999) in England over the past few holds—was launched, special earmarked allocations of years. In this article, the background to its development money were distributed to local health authorities, and is summarized, together with the research base on which grants (albeit relatively small ones) were given to national it drew and the early stages of its implementation and and local voluntary organizations involved in awareness impact.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey Report
    R YouGov/ Sunday Times Survey Results YouGov Sample Size: 1755 Fieldwork: 10th - 11th April 2008 For detailed results, click here % Headline Voting Intention [Excluding Don't Knows and Wouldn't Votes] Con 44 Lab 28 Lib Dem 17 Other 11 Do you think Gordon Brown is doing well or badly as prime minister? Very well 2 Fairly well 26 Fairly badly 37 Very badly 28 Don’t know 7 Do you think David Cameron is doing well or badly as Conservative leader? Very well 7 Fairly well 44 Fairly badly 27 Very badly 11 Don’t know 11 Do you think Nick Clegg is doing well or badly as leader of the Liberal Democrats? Very well 1 Fairly well 25 Fairly badly 24 Very badly 11 Don’t know 38 Do you think house prices in your area will rise or fall over the next 12 months? Rise by more than 10% 2 Rise by less than 10% 10 TOTAL RISE 12 Stay about the same 28 Fall by less than 10% 41 Fall by more than 10% 13 TOTAL FALL 54 Don’t know 6 Over the next 12 months do you think Britain's economy will... Grow at a faster rate than over the past 12 months 1 Grow at about the same rate 5 Grow more slowly 35 Not grow at all 28 Go into recession 26 Don't know 6 1 © 2008 YouGov plc. All Rights Reserved www.yougov.com R % YouGov How much do you trust Gordon Brown and Alistair Darling to lead Britain through the present financial crisis? Trust a lot 4 Trust to some extent 25 Do not trust much 30 Do not trust at all 36 Don’t know 6 Thinking about Prime Minister Gordon Brown which of the following qualities do you think he has? [Please tick all that apply.] Sticks to what he believes
    [Show full text]
  • Adult Learning in England: a Review
    the Institute for Employment Studies Adult Learning in England: a Review J Hillage T Uden F Aldridge J Eccles IES Report 369 HR Response to Organisational Change 1 ADULT LEARNING IN ENGLAND a Review Other titles from IES: The IES Annual Graduate Review 2000: a diverse and fragmented market Pearson R, Aston J, Bates P, Jagger N IES Report 367, 2000. ISBN 1-85184-297-7 Skills for a Competitive Future: a survey for the Pharmaceutical Industry Industrial Jagger N, Aston J IES Report 366, 2000. ISBN 1-85184-296-9 The Art of Getting Started: Graduate skills in a fragmented labour market La Valle I, O’Regan S, Jackson C IES Report 364, 2000. ISBN 1-85184-294-2 Nurturing Conservators: the Early Career Paths of Conservation Graduates Jagger N, Aston J IES Report 362, 2000. ISBN 1-85184-291-8 Employability and Employers: the missing piece of the jigsaw Tamkin P, Hillage J IES Report 361, 1999. ISBN 1-85184-290-X Graduates Mean Business Tackey N, Perryman S IES Report 357, 1999. ISBN 1-85184-286-1 Developing the Key Skills of Young People: an evaluation of initiatives in the former Avon area Kodz J, Dench S, Pollard E, Evans C IES Report 350, 1998. ISBN 1-85184-278-0 Employers’ Perceptions of Key Skills Dench S, Perryman S, Giles L IES Report 349, 1998. ISBN 1-85184-275-6 A catalogue of these and over 100 other titles is available from IES, or on the IES Website, www.employment-studies.co.uk the Institute for Employment Studies Adult Learning in England: a Review J Hillage T Uden F Aldridge J Eccles Report 369 Published by: Institute for Employment Studies Mantell Building Falmer Brighton BN1 9RF UK Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Are We Being De-Gifted Miss
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Brunel University Research Archive This is the accepted version of the following article: Koshy, V. and Pinheiro-Torres, C. (2013), ‘Are we being de- gifted, Miss?’ Primary school gifted and talented co-ordinators’ responses to the Gifted and Talented Education Policy in England. British Educational Research Journal, 39: 953–978. doi: 10.1002/berj.3021, which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/berj.3021/abstract. Are we being de-gifted Miss?’ Primary School Gifted and Talented Co-ordinators’ responses to the Gifted and Talented Education Policy in England. Valsa Koshy and Catrin Pinheiro-Torres, Brunel University Abstract Over a decade ago the UK Government launched its gifted and talented education policy in England yet there has been very little published research which considers how schools and teachers are interpreting and implementing the policy. By seeking the views of the gifted and talented co-ordinators*¹ with responsibility for addressing the requirements of the policy, the study reported in this paper explored how primary schools in England responded to the policy. Drawing on data gathered using questionnaires with a national sample of primary schools as well as follow-up in-depth interviews with a sample of G&T co-ordinators, the authors report their findings. The study found that there was considerable unease about the concept of identifying and ‘labelling’ a group of pupils as ‘gifted and talented’. G&T co- ordinators found it difficult to interpret the policy requirements and were responding pragmatically to what they considered to be required by the government.
    [Show full text]
  • The Crisis of the Democratic Left in Europe
    The crisis of the democratic left in Europe Denis MacShane Published by Progress 83Victoria Street, London SW1H 0HW Tel: 020 3008 8180 Fax: 020 3008 8181 Email: [email protected] www.progressonline.org.uk Progress is an organisation of Labour party members which aims to promote a radical and progressive politics for the 21st century. We seek to discuss, develop and advance the means to create a more free, equal and democratic Britain, which plays an active role in Europe and the wider the world. Diverse and inclusive, we work to improve the level and quality of debate both within the Labour party, and between the party and the wider progressive communnity. Honorary President : Rt Hon Alan Milburn MP Chair : StephenTwigg Vice chairs : Rt Hon Andy Burnham MP, Chris Leslie, Rt Hon Ed Miliband MP, Baroness Delyth Morgan, Meg Munn MP Patrons : Rt Hon Douglas Alexander MP, Wendy Alexander MSP, Ian Austin MP, Rt Hon Hazel Blears MP, Rt HonYvette Cooper MP, Rt Hon John Denham MP, Parmjit Dhanda MP, Natascha Engel MP, Lorna Fitzsimons, Rt Hon Peter Hain MP, John Healey MP, Rt Hon Margaret Hodge MP, Rt Hon Beverley Hughes MP, Rt Hon John Hutton MP, Baroness Jones, Glenys Kinnock MEP, Sadiq Kahn MP, Oona King, David Lammy MP, Cllr Richard Leese,Rt Hon Peter Mandelson, Pat McFadden MP, Rt Hon David Miliband MP,Trevor Phillips, Baroness Prosser, Rt Hon James Purnell MP, Jane Roberts, LordTriesman. Kitty Ussher MP, Martin Winter Honorary Treasurer : Baroness Margaret Jay Director : Robert Philpot Deputy Director : Jessica Asato Website and Communications Manager :Tom Brooks Pollock Events and Membership Officer : Mark Harrison Publications and Events Assistant : EdThornton Published by Progress 83 Victoria Street, London SW1H 0HW Tel: 020 3008 8180 Fax: 020 3008 8181 Email: [email protected] www.progressives.org.uk 1 .
    [Show full text]
  • Elitist Britain? Foreword
    Elitist Britain? Foreword This report from the Commission on Social Mobility and Child This risks narrowing the conduct of public life to a small few, Poverty Commission examines who is in charge of our who are very familiar with each other but far less familiar with country. It does so on the basis of new research which has the day-to-day challenges facing ordinary people in the analysed the background of 4,000 leaders in politics, country. That is not a recipe for a healthy democratic society. business, the media and other aspects of public life in the UK. To confront the challenges and seize the opportunities that This research highlights a dramatic over-representation of Britain faces, a broader range of experiences and talents need those educated at independent schools and Oxbridge across to be harnessed. Few people believe that the sum total of the institutions that have such a profound influence on what talent in Britain resides in just seven per cent of pupils in our happens in our country. It suggests that Britain is deeply country’s schools and less than two per cent of students in our elitist. universities. The risk, however, is that the more a few That matters for a number of reasons. In a democratic society, dominate our country’s leading institutions the less likely it is institutions – from the law to the media – derive their authority that the many believe they can make a valuable contribution. in part from how inclusive and grounded they are. Locking out A closed shop at the top can all too easily give rise to a “not a diversity of talents and experiences makes Britain’s leading for the likes of me” syndrome in the rest of society.
    [Show full text]
  • Lead Shot -The Future?
    LEAD SHOT The Future? PART I williampowell.com/gunroom An Introduction The main landowning and shooting organisations recently issued a press release, saying they are working towards a voluntary ban on all single use plastics, (including wads and cases), as well as a voluntary ban on lead shot, all within 5 years. This prompted a response from the four UK Cartridge using lead, this will mean alternative materials will need to Manufacturers, who expressed concern that they were not be adopted by UK Guns, in order for game to be sold into consulted and who also said that it was totally unrealistic the European marketplace. to achieve this, within the stated time frame. They set The ECHA have just reported on the matter, and it is worth out their reasons why and it is clear that currently there stating that lead is NOT included in this year’s deliberations is neither the availability of alternative shot on the scale and will NOT be included in discussions over the next 12 required, but also, we are still a long way away from having months or possibly longer. We do however, believe that it the right technology, to develop “non-toxic” cartridges will be on their agenda reasonably soon and as worrying, is using steel without the use of plastic. We would add that the issue of the proposed ban on lead shot over wetlands, the effect that the current pandemic has had, and will using a fuller definition of wetlands than at present, as well continue to have on cartridge sales and hence on the as introducing a buffer zone, (currently standing at 300m).
    [Show full text]
  • Shuffling the Pack
    SHUFFLING THE PACK A brief guide to government reshuffles Shuffling the Pack 1 Akash Paun Shuffling the Pack Introduction The reshuffle is one of the most potent weapons in the prime ministerial armoury – albeit one that can occasionally explode in the face of the person using it. Enacting legislation, implementing public service reform, or rooting out government waste can take months or years, with no guarantee of success. But on reshuffle day a prime minister, in principle, wields unlimited power. In practice, things can feel rather different, as prime ministers are confronted by a range of constraints. Even when a PM does formulate a bold plan to remould the cabinet, there is much that can and often does go wrong. Reshuffles also carry political risks for prime ministers, given the inevitable creation of enemies and disappointed allies on the backbenches. From a personal point of view, the reshuffle can be draining too: past leaders have described having to break the bad news as “a ghastly business” (Tony Blair),1 “the most distasteful...of all the tasks which fall to the lot of a prime minister” (Clement Attlee), and “something you have to grit your teeth to do” (Margaret Thatcher).2 Yet, perhaps surprisingly, most recent prime ministers have carried out reshuffles on a near annual basis, calculating that the political benefits can outweigh the risks and the sheer unpleasantness of the experience. Typically, reshuffles are interpreted through a narrow political lens. But a broader test that should be applied is whether reshuffles have any impact on the effectiveness, the performance or the policy direction of the government.
    [Show full text]