PRIMARY and GENERAL ELECTIONS
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Building the Progressive City: Third Sector Housing in Burlington By
Building the Progressive City: Third Sector Housing in Burlington By John Emmeus Davis Two months after Ronald Reagan assumed office as the fortieth president of the United States, Bernie Sanders was elected the thirty-second mayor of Burlington, Vermont. Both men remained in office for eight years. When Reagan stepped down in 1989, his policies and programs were continued by his vice-president, who was elevated to the presidency by the same conservative coalition that had supported Reagan. Sanders stepped down in 1989 after serving four two-year terms as mayor. His policies and programs were continued by Peter Clavelle, who had served as Sanders’s director of community and economic development. Clavelle was carried into office on the shoulders of Burlington’s “Progressive Coalition,’ the same third-party movement that had supported Sanders. There is considerable irony in the fact that the decade of the “Reagan revolution” in Washington was also the decade of “Sanderista” rule in Burlington. These two political movements had little in common. Their leaders, Reagan and Sanders, shared even less. Indeed, it would have been difficult to find two elected officials anywhere in the United States during the 1980s who were further apart in background, ideology, and political agenda. The man elected president was a middle-class midwesterner of Irish descent whose entire career, first in the movies and then in politics, had been heavily bankrolled and carefully scripted by men of wealth and power. Ronald Reagan was the most conservative politician to occupy the White House in fifty years, a person whose entire political philosophy was built around the single idea that private individuals and private markets could solve nearly every problem of poverty, unemployment, and injustice if government would just stop meddling in matters that were not its proper concern. -
After Bernie—Party Time?
After Bernie—Party Time? Bernie Sanders’ presidential campaign has rocketed across the political landscape in this most abnormal of election seasons—an independent, self- defined democratic socialist running in the Democratic primary contest. Widely expected to fizzle out early, Sanders’ campaign instead gathered momentum as the primaries progressed, revealing the gulf that separates the Democrats’ corporate-driven apparatus from much of its angry working-class and youthful voting base. Despite the mass excitement Sanders generated, and the scare he threw into the party machinery, there was never a chance that he would be allowed to get the nomination. The party elites were 99 percent convinced, after all, that he could not win the November general election—and 1 percent utterly terrified that he just might. (At this writing, in any case, with the last round of primaries ahead in May and early June, it appears that Hillary Clinton’s delegate lead is large enough that the nomination won’t need to be “stolen” from Sanders by means of the unelected party superdelegates.) The significance of the Sanders movement, however, vastly transcends this particular election. For one thing, the working-class anger that he (and Donald Trump, from a reactionary, economic-nationalist direction) tapped may have killed the corporate coup known as the Trans-Pacific Partnership, although the movement must be wary of a treacherous postelection, lame-duck Congress. But well beyond that important struggle, breaking through the fundamental contradiction between the potential of Sanders’ movement and the political structure within which it’s currently ensnared could set the course of U.S. -
Ballot Access News
BALLOT ACCESS NEWS San Francisco- C-alifornia ï)eeemher l5- 19q0 Volume 6 Number 9 I99O "OTIIER'VOTE FORTOP OFFICES LIBERTARIAN PARTY TO LAUNCH WAS TIIE HIGIIEST SINCE I98O LOBBANG CAMPAIGN Iast month, 4.790 of the voters voted for a candidate other On December 9, the Libertarian Party National than the Democratic or Republican nominee, for the most Committee voted to launch a nationwide lobbying important office on the ballot. This contrasts with 1988, campaign in state legislatures to improve presidential when fewer than 190 ofthe voters voted for a presidential ballot access. The goal is to make it possible for a new, candidate other than Cæorge Bush or Michael fhrkakis. or previously unqualified political party, to do the work of getting on the ballot, before it has chosen its presidential Furthermore, in 1990, there was an'other'candidate (i.e., third party or independent candidate) on the ballot for the candidate. most important office in states containing only 600/o of Many states provide that a new party cannot begin to the voters. Among those 6070 of the 1990 voters who circulate a ballot access petition, until after the party has *other" had a ballot with an candidate on it for the most named its presidential candidate. This is because the laws important office, 7.8Vo of them did vote for that "other" of these states require that the party's candidates be named *other" candidate. By contrast, in 1988, there was an on the petition. Obviously, in these states, the party can't candidate on the ballot for president in all states. -
Comps Final Draft
Rules for Resistors: A Comparative Analysis of the Working Families Party and Tea Party Danielle Raskin UEP 411: Senior Comprehensive Seminar in Urban and Environmental Policy April 12, 2017 Table of Contents 1. Abstract…………………………………………..…………….………………………….1 2. Introduction………………………………………………………………………………..2 3. Background………………………………………..………….…………….………..……3 Defining Duopoly and its Protectors……………..…………………….……….…3 A Brief History of the Two Parties……………………..………….………………7 A Brief History of Third Parties……………..…………..………….………..……8 Contemporary Third Parties..…………………………………………………….12 4. Literature Review……………………………………………….……………….……….15 Keys for Successful Third Party Candidates..….………………………………..15 Relationships to the Political Establishment…………….……….………………17 Relationships to the Organizational Establishment……………….………..……20 Do We Even Need a Third Party?: Counterarguments…………….……….……23 5. Methodology…………………………………………………………..…………………24 6. Findings………………………………………………………………………………….25 Structure………………………………………………………….………………25 Organizing…………………………………………………….………….………26 Elections…………………………………………………….……………………29 7. Comparative Analysis……………………………..…………..…………………………31 Strategy…………………………………………………………………………..31 Elections…………………………………………………………………………32 Organizing……………………………………………………………………….34 Power………………………………………………………………….…………35 8. Recommendations…………………..……………………………………………………39 Pass Instant Runoff Voting………….……………………………………………39 Reform Ballot Access, Sore Loser & Fusion Voting Laws………………………39 Reform Districting & Public Financing……………….…………………………40 Forgo the Ballot -
PRIMARY and GENERAL ELECTIONS
PRIMARY and GENERAL ELECTIONS VERMONT 1 356 1992 GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS 1992 GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS Windsor-5 State Representative Windsor-Orange-1 State Representative Race Totals Norwich Tracy Hall AILIR. FARRAR 1199 DAVID K. BROWN 529 BILL MAASS 1021 NANCY CRESSMAN 642 BILL MACKINNON 820 seats: 1 Race Total: 2220 DAVID A. MCCULLOUGH 235 ANN SEIBERT 1358 Poll Total: 3584 Royalton School Gym DAVID K. BROWN 600 Windsor-6 State Representative NANCY CRESSMAN 324 BILL MACKINNON 318 Springfield DAVID A. MCCULLOUGH 474 ALICE M. EMMONS 2105 ANN SEIBERT 320 THEODORE F. LINDGREN 27 1 BRIAN J. MURPHY 2028 Poll Total: 2036 Poll Total: 6844 Sharon Elementary School DAVID K. BROWN 297 Race Totals NANCY CRESSMAN 121 ALICE M. EMMONS 2105 BILL MACKINNON 341 THEODORE F. LINDGREN 27 1 DAVID A. MCCULLOUGH 146 BRIAN J. MURPHY 2028 ANN SEIBERT 195 seats:2 Race Total: 6844 Poll Total: 1100 Strafford DAVID K. BROWN 323 NANCY CRESSMAN 207 BILL MACKINNON 149 DAVID A. MCCULLOUGH 81 ANN SEIBERT 224 Poll Total: 984 357 1992 GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS 1992 GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS Windsor-Orange- 1 State Representative Windsor-RutIand-2 State Representative Race Totals Bethel DAVID K. BROWN 1749 DOUG COLLINS 318 NANCY CRESSMAN 1294 BARBARA C. WOOD 566 BILL MACKINNON 1628 DAVID A. MCCULLOUGH 936 Poll Total: 884 ANN SEIBERT 2097 Pittsfield seats:2 Race Total: 7704 DOUG COLLINS 102 BARBARA C. WOOD 121 Poll Total: 223 Rochester DOUG COLLINS 297 Windsor-Rutland-1 State Representative BARBARA C. WOOD 354 Ludlow Poll Total: 651 ALBERT "MONK" MARTIN 481 JOHN F. MURPHY 708 Stockbridge DOUG COLLINS 146 Poll Total: 1189 BARBARA C. -
Argued: May 7, 2001 5 Decided: August 7, 2002
1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 _______________ 4 August Term, 2000 5 (Argued: May 7, 2001 Decided: August 7, 2002) 6 7 Docket Nos. 00-9159(L), 00-9180(Con), 00-9231(xap), 00-9139(xap), and 00-9240(xap) 8 9 _______________ 10 MARCELLA LANDELL, 11 12 Plaintiff-Appellee, 13 14 DONALD R. BRUNELLE, VERMONT RIGHT TO LIFE COMMITTEE, INC., POLITICAL COMMITTEE, 15 NEIL RANDALL, GEORGE KUUSELA, STEVE HOWARD, JEFFREY A. NELSON, JOHN PATCH, 16 VERMONT LIBERTARIAN PARTY, VERMONT REPUBLICAN STATE COMMITTEE and VERMONT 17 RIGHT TO LIFE COMMITTEE-FUND FOR INDEPENDENT POLITICAL EXPENDITURES, 18 19 Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants, 20 21 22 —v.— 23 24 VERMONT PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP, LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF VERMONT, 25 RURAL VERMONT, VERMONT OLDER WOMEN'S LEAGUE, VERMONT ALLIANCE OF 26 CONSERVATION VOTERS, MIKE FIORILLO, MARION GREY, PHIL HOFF, FRANK HUARD, KAREN 27 KITZMILLER, MARION MILNE, DARYL PILLSBURY, ELIZABETH READY, NANCY RICE, CHERYL 28 RIVERS and MARIA THOMPSON, 29 30 Intervenors-Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees, 31 32 WILLIAM H. SORRELL, JOHN T. QUINN, WILLIAM WRIGHT, DALE O. GRAY, LAUREN BOWERMAN, 33 VINCENT ILLUZZI, JAMES HUGHES, GEORGE E. RICE, JOEL W. PAGE, JAMES D. MCNIGHT, KEITH 34 W. FLYNN, JAMES P. MONGEON, TERRY TRONO, DAN DAVIS, ROBERT L. SAND and DEBORAH L. 1 1 MARKOWITZ, 2 3 Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees. 4 5 _______________ 6 B e f o r e : 7 8 WINTER, STRAUB, and POOLER, Circuit Judges. 9 _______________ 10 11 Appeal from the entry of a judgment by the United States District Court for the District of 12 Vermont (William K.