DOCSLIB.ORG

Seabird Habitat Use and Zooplankton Abundance and Biomass in Relation to Water Mass Properties in the Northern Gulf of Alaska

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Seabird Habitat Use and Zooplankton Abundance and Biomass in Relation to Water Mass Properties in the Northern Gulf of Alaska Seabird Habitat Use And Zooplankton Abundance And Biomass In Relation To Water Mass Properties In The Northern Gulf Of Alaska Item Type Thesis Authors De Sousa, Leandra Download date 26/09/2021 02:51:03 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/9077 SEABIRD HABITAT USE AND ZOOPLANKTON ABUNDANCE AND BIOMASS IN RELATION TO WATER MASS PROPERTIES IN THE NORTHERN GULF OF ALASKA By Leandra de Sousa RECOMMENDED: Dr. Ronald Barry Dr. Alan Springer C / k—' Dr. George HunOr. 1 ^ rr— __________ Dr. Thomas“Wjei^gamier, Advisory Committee Co-Chair Dr. Kgnneth Coyle, A ^s^p C o m m ittee Chair f5r. Katrin Iken Head, Program in Marine Science and Limnology APPROVED: Dr. Michael Castellini Dean, School ofErsheries and Ocean Sciences /K _________ Dr. Laurence Duffy, Dean of the Gradj/ate School SEABIRD HABITAT USE AND ZOOPLANKTON ABUNDANCE AND BIOMASS IN RELATION TO WATER MASS PROPERTIES IN THE NORTHERN GULF OF ALASKA A THESIS Presented to the Faculty of the University of Alaska Fairbanks in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By Leandra de Sousa, B.S. and Licensed Teacher Fairbanks, Alaska August 2011 UMI Number: 3484667 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI' Dissertation Publishing UMI 3484667 Copyright 2011 by ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This edition of the work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. uestA ® ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 ABSTRACT Understanding of biological and physical mechanisms that control the Gulf of Alaska (GOA) ecosystem is of major importance to predicting the responses of bird and zooplankton communities to environmental changes in this region. I investigated seasonal (March-October) changes in seabird abundance in relation to changes in zooplankton biomass and water mass properties from 1998 to 2003. Oceanodroma furcata and Fratercula cirrhata were most abundant during the peak of the zooplankton production season (May-August). Overall abundance of seabirds did not follow seasonal changes in zooplankton biomass. Seabird abundance was low in the study area when compared to other regions in the GOA. Furthermore, low bird densities suggest that productivity in this study area is not high enough to sustain a significant seasonal increase in local seabird abundance. I further investigated the distribution and abundance of seabird foraging guilds across the neritic and oceanic domains in relation to water mass properties and zooplankton biomass during March and April. Overall zooplankton biomass increased from the inner shelf to the oceanic domain. Highest density of subsurface-foraging seabirds occurred in the middle shelf and surface-feeding seabirds were most abundant in the middle shelf and oceanic domain. Murre ( Uria spp.) abundance was positively correlated with the biomass of Thysanoessa inermis, and Northern Fulmars (Fulmarus glacialis) were associated with cephalopod paralarvae andEucalanus bungii. Elevated biomass of Thysanoessa inermis in March and April may be an important factor influencing habitat choice of wintering murres in this region. Lastly, I investigated the inter-annual variation in the abundance of sixteen zooplankton taxa in relation to water mass properties during May from 1998 to 2009. Significant variations in temperature, salinity and zooplankton abundance were identified. Thysanoessa inermis and Calanus marshallae had increased abundances in years when there was a strong phytoplankton spring bloom preceded by anomalously cold winters. However, abundances of Pseudocalanus spp.,Neocalanus plumchrus/Neocalanus flemingeri, Euphausiapacifica and Oithona spp. were not strongly affected by relatively higher mean water temperatures. The abundance of zooplankton in the northern GOA was highly influenced by advective processes. V TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Signature Page........................................................................................................................... i Title Page...................................................................................................................................ii Abstract.....................................................................................................................................iii Table of Contents..................................................................................................................... v List of Figures.......................................................................................................................... ix List of Tables......................................................................................................................... xvi List of Appendices.................................................................................................................xix Acknowledgements................................................................................................................xx Introduction...............................................................................................................................1 Seabirds ...........................................................................................................................1 Physical environment.................................................................................................... 3 Zooplankton and hydrography..................................................................................... 5 Seabirds, zooplankton and hydrography..................................................................... 8 Chapter 1. Seasonal characterization of seabird distribution and habitat use in the northern Gulf of Alaska........................................................................................................11 Abstract ..................................................................................................................................... 11 Introduction ...............................................................................................................................12 Methods 15 Seabirds 15 Seasonality................................................................................................................... 18 Hydrography................................................................................................................ 19 Zooplankton................................................................................................................. 19 Data analyses...............................................................................................................20 Results ....................................................................................................................................... 23 Seabirds ........................................................................................................................ 23 Zooplankton.................................................................................................................26 Seabirds and zooplankton .......................................................................................... 26 Water column structure and seabirds ........................................................................ 28 Discussion .................................................................................................................................28 Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................................35 References.................................................................................................................................37 Chapter 2. Habitat partitioning of seabird foraging guilds in the northern Gulf of Alaska in relation to water masses and zooplankton biomass...................................... 72 Abstract .....................................................................................................................................72 Introduction ...............................................................................................................................73 Methods.....................................................................................................................................75 Study area..................................................................................................................... 75 Seabirds ........................................................................................................................ 76 Zooplankton.................................................................................................................77 Hydrography................................................................................................................78 Data analyses...............................................................................................................79 Results ....................................................................................................................................... 83 Discussion .................................................................................................................................88 Physical environment.................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • National Monitoring Program for Biodiversity and Non-Indigenous Species in Egypt
    UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM MEDITERRANEAN ACTION PLAN REGIONAL ACTIVITY CENTRE FOR SPECIALLY PROTECTED AREAS National monitoring program for biodiversity and non-indigenous species in Egypt PROF. MOUSTAFA M. FOUDA April 2017 1 Study required and financed by: Regional Activity Centre for Specially Protected Areas Boulevard du Leader Yasser Arafat BP 337 1080 Tunis Cedex – Tunisie Responsible of the study: Mehdi Aissi, EcApMEDII Programme officer In charge of the study: Prof. Moustafa M. Fouda Mr. Mohamed Said Abdelwarith Mr. Mahmoud Fawzy Kamel Ministry of Environment, Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency (EEAA) With the participation of: Name, qualification and original institution of all the participants in the study (field mission or participation of national institutions) 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS page Acknowledgements 4 Preamble 5 Chapter 1: Introduction 9 Chapter 2: Institutional and regulatory aspects 40 Chapter 3: Scientific Aspects 49 Chapter 4: Development of monitoring program 59 Chapter 5: Existing Monitoring Program in Egypt 91 1. Monitoring program for habitat mapping 103 2. Marine MAMMALS monitoring program 109 3. Marine Turtles Monitoring Program 115 4. Monitoring Program for Seabirds 118 5. Non-Indigenous Species Monitoring Program 123 Chapter 6: Implementation / Operational Plan 131 Selected References 133 Annexes 143 3 AKNOWLEGEMENTS We would like to thank RAC/ SPA and EU for providing financial and technical assistances to prepare this monitoring programme. The preparation of this programme was the result of several contacts and interviews with many stakeholders from Government, research institutions, NGOs and fishermen. The author would like to express thanks to all for their support. In addition; we would like to acknowledge all participants who attended the workshop and represented the following institutions: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • New Insights Into Global Biogeography, Population Structure and Natural Selection from the Genome of the Epipelagic Copepod Oithona
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317819489 New insights into global biogeography, population structure and natural selection from the genome of the epipelagic copepod Oithona Article in Molecular Ecology · June 2017 DOI: 10.1111/mec.14214 CITATIONS READS 5 296 12 authors, including: Mohammed-Amin Madoui Julie Poulain Genoscope - Centre National de Séquençage Atomic Energy and Alternative Energies Commission 30 PUBLICATIONS 543 CITATIONS 352 PUBLICATIONS 17,316 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Kevin Sugier Benjamin Noel Genoscope - Centre National de Séquençage CEA-Institut de Génomique 2 PUBLICATIONS 5 CITATIONS 67 PUBLICATIONS 5,688 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Caracterization of new viruses from Arthropods View project TARA Expeditions : http://oceans.taraexpeditions.org/en/m/science/goals/ View project All content following this page was uploaded by Mohammed-Amin Madoui on 26 July 2017. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Received: 22 January 2017 | Revised: 22 March 2017 | Accepted: 24 May 2017 DOI: 10.1111/mec.14214 ORIGINAL ARTICLE New insights into global biogeography, population structure and natural selection from the genome of the epipelagic copepod Oithona Mohammed-Amin Madoui1,2,3 | Julie Poulain1 | Kevin Sugier1,2,3 | Marc Wessner1 | Benjamin Noel1 | Leo Berline4 | Karine Labadie1 | Astrid Cornils5 | Leocadio Blanco-Bercial6 | Lars Stemmann7
    [Show full text]
  • (Cyclopoida, Copepoda), Fed on Different Diets
    animals Article Population Dynamics, Fecundity and Fatty Acid Composition of Oithona nana (Cyclopoida, Copepoda), Fed on Different Diets Fawzy I. Magouz 1, Mohamed A. Essa 2, Mustafa Matter 2, Abdallah Tageldein Mansour 3,4,* , Mohamed Alkafafy 5 and Mohamed Ashour 2,* 1 Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh 33516, Egypt; [email protected] 2 National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries (NIOF), Cairo 11516, Egypt; [email protected] (M.A.E.); [email protected] (M.M.) 3 Animal and Fish Production Department, College of Agricultural and Food Sciences, King Faisal University, P.O. Box 420, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia 4 Fish and Animal Production Department, Faculty of Agriculture (Saba Basha), Alexandria University, Alexandria 21531, Egypt 5 Department of Biotechnology, College of Science, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (A.T.M.); [email protected] (M.A.) Simple Summary: Marine larval production is the most critical stage in the life of the marine aquacultured species, which depends on the use of different zooplanktonic organisms as live feed. Copepods are high-quality live prey that could be efficiently used to overcome the transition period from live food to weaning with an artificial diet in the post-larval stages. The main culture systems of copepods use microalgae as uni-food, nevertheless for the more sustainable and cost-efficient Citation: Magouz, F.I.; Essa, M.A.; production of copepods, the development of artificial diets is the core of its production techniques. Matter, M.; Tageldein Mansour, A.; The present study was conducted to improve the production and nutritional quality of copepod, Alkafafy, M.; Ashour, M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Non-Indigenous Oithona Davisae in a Mediterranean
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN The non‑indigenous Oithona davisae in a Mediterranean transitional environment: coexistence patterns with competing species Marco Pansera1, Elisa Camatti1*, Anna Schroeder1,2, Giacomo Zagami3 & Alessandro Bergamasco1 The Venice lagoon (VL) has been recognized as a hot spot of introduction of non‑indigenous species (NIS), due to several anthropogenic factors and environmental stressors that combined may facilitate NIS invasions. In the last decades an increasing number of zooplankton NIS have been observed in the VL. This work aims to provide a picture of the annual cycle and distribution of the recently recorded non‑indigenous copepod Oithona davisae, considering the coexistence patterns with the congeneric resident Oithona nana. Therefore, zooplankton samplings were carried out monthly from August 2016 to July 2017 at fve Long‑Term Ecological Research LTER stations in the VL. Oithona davisae showed a persistent occurrence throughout the year with the highest abundances in the warm season and in the inner areas, while the congeneric O. nana, showing a diferent distribution pattern, resulted more abundant near the inlets of the Lagoon, where O. davisae reached the minimum density. Oithona davisae seems to fnd local conditions that promote its settlement and distribution, especially in the inner and more trophic lagoon sites. In other European coastal embayments or transitional waters, O. davisae occupied the niche left by the indigenous O. nana or can replace this congeneric species through competitive exclusion mechanisms. Our data indicate that, for now, such species replacement has not occurred in the VL. One of the causes is the extreme variety of habitats and niches ofered by this environment allowing a balanced coexistence with O.
    [Show full text]
  • Oithona Baird, 1843
    # 188 MAY 2019 Oithona Baird, 1843 ICES IDENTIFICATION LEAFLETS FOR PLANKTON ICES INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR THE EXPLORATION OF THE SEA CIEM CONSEIL INTERNATIONAL POUR L’EXPLORATION DE LA MER ICES IDENTIFICATION LEAFLETS FOR PLANKTON NO. 188 MAY 2019 Oithona Baird, 1843 Maria Grazia Mazzocchi International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer H. C. Andersens Boulevard 44–46 DK-1553 Copenhagen V Denmark Telephone (+45) 33 38 67 00 Telefax (+45) 33 93 42 15 www.ices.dk [email protected] Recommended format for purposes of citation: Mazzocchi, M. G. 2019. Oithona Baird, 1843. ICES Identification Leaflets for Plankton. No. 188, pp. 16. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5254 Series Editors: Antonina dos Santos and Lidia Yebra. Prepared under the auspices of the ICES Working Group on Zooplankton Ecology. The material in this report may be reused for non-commercial purposes using the recommended citation. ICES may only grant usage rights of information, data, images, graphs, etc. of which it has ownership. For other third-party material cited in this report, you must contact the original copyright holder for permission. For citation of datasets or use of data to be included in other databases, please refer to the latest ICES data policy on the ICES website. All extracts must be acknowledged. For other reproduction requests please contact the General Secretary. Cover image: Inês M. Dias and Lígia F. de Sousa for ICES ID Plankton Leaflets. ISBN 978-87-7482-233-2 ISSN 0109–2510 © 2019 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Oithona Baird, 1843 | 1 Contents 1 Abstract ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • National Monitoring Program for Biodiversity and Non-Indigenous Species in Egypt
    National monitoring program for biodiversity and non-indigenous species in Egypt January 2016 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS page Acknowledgements 3 Preamble 4 Chapter 1: Introduction 8 Overview of Egypt Biodiversity 37 Chapter 2: Institutional and regulatory aspects 39 National Legislations 39 Regional and International conventions and agreements 46 Chapter 3: Scientific Aspects 48 Summary of Egyptian Marine Biodiversity Knowledge 48 The Current Situation in Egypt 56 Present state of Biodiversity knowledge 57 Chapter 4: Development of monitoring program 58 Introduction 58 Conclusions 103 Suggested Monitoring Program Suggested monitoring program for habitat mapping 104 Suggested marine MAMMALS monitoring program 109 Suggested Marine Turtles Monitoring Program 115 Suggested Monitoring Program for Seabirds 117 Suggested Non-Indigenous Species Monitoring Program 121 Chapter 5: Implementation / Operational Plan 128 Selected References 130 Annexes 141 2 AKNOWLEGEMENTS 3 Preamble The Ecosystem Approach (EcAp) is a strategy for the integrated management of land, water and living resources that promotes conservation and sustainable use in an equitable way, as stated by the Convention of Biological Diversity. This process aims to achieve the Good Environmental Status (GES) through the elaborated 11 Ecological Objectives and their respective common indicators. Since 2008, Contracting Parties to the Barcelona Convention have adopted the EcAp and agreed on a roadmap for its implementation. First phases of the EcAp process led to the accomplishment of 5 steps of the scheduled 7-steps process such as: 1) Definition of an Ecological Vision for the Mediterranean; 2) Setting common Mediterranean strategic goals; 3) Identification of an important ecosystem properties and assessment of ecological status and pressures; 4) Development of a set of ecological objectives corresponding to the Vision and strategic goals; and 5) Derivation of operational objectives with indicators and target levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Male Differentiation in the Marine Copepod Oithona Nana
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.07.443100; this version posted May 8, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 1 Male differentiation in the marine copepod Oithona nana reveals the 2 development of a new nervous ganglion linked to Lin12-Notch-Repeat 3 protein-associated proteolysis 4 Kevin Sugier1, [email protected] 5 Romuald Laso-Jadart1, [email protected] 6 Benoit Vacherie2, [email protected] 7 Jos Käfer3, [email protected] 8 Laurie Bertrand1, [email protected] 9 Karine Labadie2, [email protected] 10 Nathalie Martins1, [email protected] 11 Céline Orvain1, [email protected] 12 Emmanuelle Petit2, [email protected] 13 Julie Poulain1, [email protected] 14 Patrick Wincker1, [email protected] 15 Jean-Louis Jamet4, [email protected] 16 Adriana Alberti2 , [email protected] 17 Mohammed-Amin Madoui1, [email protected], corresponding author 18 1Génomique Métabolique, Genoscope, Institut François Jacob, CEA, CNRS, Univ Evry, Université Paris-Saclay, 19 Evry, France 20 2Genoscope, Institut de biologie François-Jacob, Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique (CEA), Université Paris- 21 Saclay, F-91000 Evry, France 22 3Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, CNRS, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive UMR 5558, F- 23 69622 Villeurbanne, France 24 4Université de Toulon, Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS/INSU/IRD, Mediterranean Institute of Oceanography 25 MIO UMR 7294, EMBIO, CS 60584, 83041 Toulon cedex 9, France bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.07.443100; this version posted May 8, 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Checklist of the Marine Macroinvertebrates of Alaska David T
    NOAA Professional Paper NMFS 19 An annotated checklist of the marine macroinvertebrates of Alaska David T. Drumm • Katherine P. Maslenikov Robert Van Syoc • James W. Orr • Robert R. Lauth Duane E. Stevenson • Theodore W. Pietsch November 2016 U.S. Department of Commerce NOAA Professional Penny Pritzker Secretary of Commerce National Oceanic Papers NMFS and Atmospheric Administration Kathryn D. Sullivan Scientific Editor* Administrator Richard Langton National Marine National Marine Fisheries Service Fisheries Service Northeast Fisheries Science Center Maine Field Station Eileen Sobeck 17 Godfrey Drive, Suite 1 Assistant Administrator Orono, Maine 04473 for Fisheries Associate Editor Kathryn Dennis National Marine Fisheries Service Office of Science and Technology Economics and Social Analysis Division 1845 Wasp Blvd., Bldg. 178 Honolulu, Hawaii 96818 Managing Editor Shelley Arenas National Marine Fisheries Service Scientific Publications Office 7600 Sand Point Way NE Seattle, Washington 98115 Editorial Committee Ann C. Matarese National Marine Fisheries Service James W. Orr National Marine Fisheries Service The NOAA Professional Paper NMFS (ISSN 1931-4590) series is pub- lished by the Scientific Publications Of- *Bruce Mundy (PIFSC) was Scientific Editor during the fice, National Marine Fisheries Service, scientific editing and preparation of this report. NOAA, 7600 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA 98115. The Secretary of Commerce has The NOAA Professional Paper NMFS series carries peer-reviewed, lengthy original determined that the publication of research reports, taxonomic keys, species synopses, flora and fauna studies, and data- this series is necessary in the transac- intensive reports on investigations in fishery science, engineering, and economics. tion of the public business required by law of this Department.
    [Show full text]
  • New Mediterranean Biodiversity Records (December 2019)
    Collective Article Mediterranean Marine Science Indexed in WoS (Web of Science, ISI Thomson) and SCOPUS The journal is available on line at http://www.medit-mar-sc.net DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12681/mms.20913 New Mediterranean Biodiversity Records (December 2019) Branko DRAGIČEVIĆ1, Olga ANADOLI2, Dror ANGEL3, Mouloud BENABDI4, Ghazi BITAR5, Luca CASTRIOTA6, Fabio CROCETTA7, Alan DEIDUN8, Jakov DULČIĆ1, Dor EDELIST3,9, Vasilis GEROVASILEIOU10, Salvatore GIACOBBE11, Alenka GORUPPI 12, Tamar GUY-HAIM13, Evangelos KONSTANTINIDIS14, Zafrir KUPLIK3,15, Joachim LANGENECK16, Armando MACALI17, Ioannis MANITARAS18, Nikolas MICHAILIDIS18,19, Evangelia MICHALOUDI2, Panayotis OVALIS20, Costas PERDIKARIS14, Roberto PILLON21, Stefano PIRAINO22, Walter RENDA23, Jamila RIZGALLA24, Andrea SPINELLI25, Jonathan TEMPESTI16, Francesco TIRALONGO21, Valentina TIRELLI12, Konstantinos TSIAMIS26, Cemal TURAN27, Necdet UYGUR27, Bruno ZAVA28 and Argyro ZENETOS29 1 Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries, Šetalište Ivana Meštrovića 63, 21000 Split, Croatia 2 Department of Zoology, School of Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece 3 Leon Recanati Institute for Maritime Studies and the Department of Maritime Civilizations, Leon H. Charney School of Marine Science, University of Haifa, Israel 4 Laboratory of Environmental Monitoring Network, Faculty of SNV, Oran1 University, Oran, Algeria 5 Lebanese University, Faculty of Sciences, Hadath, Beirut, Lebanon 6 Institute for Environmental Protection and Research, ISPRA, Lungomare Cristoforo
    [Show full text]
  • Full Text in Pdf Format
    I MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 193: 15-84, 2000 Published February 28 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Copepod grazing in a subtropical bay: species-specific responses to a midsummer increase in nanoplankton standing stock Albert Calbet*, Michael R. Landry, Rebecca D. Scheinberg Department of Oceanography, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 1000 Pope Road, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, USA ABSTRACT: Ingestion rates of 4 small copepod species (Oithona simplex, 0. nana. Acrocalanus inermis and Parvocalanus crassirostris) were investigated in Kaneohe Bay, Hawaii, during a nudsummer increase of the pico- and nanoplankton communities. There was no evidence that adult female cope- pods fed significantly on picoplankton-sized cells. However, all the species responded behaviorally to variations in the concentration (10 to 110 pg C 1-l) and size spectrum (relative increase of cells >5 pm) of nanoplankton prey. The copepods generally behaved as opportunistic particle feeders, demonstrat- ing higher consumption rates on the most abundant cells (2-5 pm nanoplankton);however, autotrophs were usually selected over heterotrophs of simdar size. Max~murningestion rates were similar for the 2 calanoids and 0. nana (around 120000 cells copepod-' d-') and lower for 0. simplex (around 40000 cells copepod-' d-l), but biomass-specific rates of 0. simplex equaled those of the other species. At the highest nanoplankton concentrations, the ingestion rates of copepods appeared saturated, daily rations ranging from 100% body C d-' for A, rnermis to 260% body C d-l for P crassirostris. The differ- ences between ingestion rates measured as cells per copepod per day and those converted to carbon suggested that ingestion might be held below potential by the cumulahve handLing times of individual prey rather than the physioloqcal constraints of food consumption and digestive processing.
    [Show full text]
  • Nauplius Short Communication the Journal of the First Record of Oithona Attenuata Farran, Brazilian Crustacean Society 1913 (Crustacea: Copepoda) from Brazil
    Nauplius SHORT COMMUNICATION THE JOURNAL OF THE First record of Oithona attenuata Farran, BRAZILIAN CRUSTACEAN SOCIETY 1913 (Crustacea: Copepoda) from Brazil 1 e-ISSN 2358-2936 Judson da Cruz Lopes da Rosa orcid.org/0000-0001-7635-8736 www.scielo.br/nau 2 orcid.org/0000-0002-1228-2805 www.crustacea.org.br Wanda Maria Monteiro-Ribas 3 Lucas Lemos Batista orcid.org/0000-0003-2389-7132 Lohengrin Dias de Almeida Fernandes2 orcid.org/0000-0002-8579-2363 1 Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Ambientais e Conservação, Laboratório Integrado de Zoologia na Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Macaé, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. 2 Instituto de Estudos do Mar Almirante Paulo Moreira, Departamento de Oceanografia, Divisão de Ecossistemas Marinhos. Arraial do Cabo, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. 3 Instituto de Biodiversidade e Sustentabilidade (NUPEM/UFRJ), Laboratório Integrado de Zoologia na Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Macaé, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. ZOOBANK: http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5761ED4C-A9E3-4A61- AB50-6537E7F192C1 ABSTRACT Here, we report the first record of the marine copepodOithona attenuata Farran, 1913, in Brazil, from a costal station near Cabo Frio Island, Arraial do Cabo Municipality, Rio de Janeiro State. Specimens were found during March and May 2011 in zooplankton samples obtained from horizontal hauls using a plankton-net with a 100μm mesh size, and mouth opening of 40 cm diameter. KEYWORDS Arraial do Cabo, Cyclopoida, geographic distribution, microcrustaceans, zooplankton The order Cyclopoida consists of 44 families of mostly holoplanktonic species (Boxshall and Halsey, 2004), of which numerous members have been shown to be good indicators of the physical-chemical characteristics of water CORRESPONDING AUTHOR (Boltovskoy, 1981; Nishida, 1985; Dias and Araujo, 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • Oithona Similis (Copepoda: Cyclopoida) - a Cosmopolitan Species?
    OITHONA SIMILIS (COPEPODA: CYCLOPOIDA) - A COSMOPOLITAN SPECIES? DISSERTATION Zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften -Dr. rer. nat- Am Fachbereich Biologie/Chemie der Universität Bremen BRITTA WEND-HECKMANN Februar 2013 1. Gutachter: PD. Dr. B. Niehoff 2. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. M. Boersma Für meinen Vater Table of contents Summary 3 Zusammenfassung 6 1. Introduction 9 1.1 Cosmopolitan and Cryptic Species 9 1.2 General introduction to the Copepoda 12 1.3 Introduction to the genus Oithona 15 1.4 Feeding and role of Oithona spp in the food web 15 1.5 Geographic and vertical distribution of Oithona similis 16 1.6. Morphology 19 1.6.1 General Morphology of the Subclass Copepoda 19 1.6.1.1 Explanations and Abbrevations 31 1.6.2 Order Cyclopoida 33 1.6.2.1 Family Oithonidae Dana 1853 35 1.6.2.2 Subfamily Oithoninae 36 1.6.2.3 Genus Oithona Baird 1843 37 1.7 DNA Barcoding 42 2. Aims of the thesis (Hypothesis) 44 3. Material and Methods 45 3.1. Investigation areas and sampling 45 3.1.1 The Arctic Ocean 46 3.1.2 The Southern Ocean 50 3.1.3 The North Sea 55 3.1.4 The Mediterranean Sea 59 3.1.5 Sampling 62 3.1.6 Preparation of the samples 62 3.2 Morphological studies and literature research 63 3.3 Genetic examinations 71 3.4 Sequencing 73 4 Results 74 4.1 Morphology of Oithona similis 74 4.1.1 Literature research 74 4.1.2 Personal observations 87 4.2.
    [Show full text]