DOCSLIB.ORG

Status, Results and Future Prospects on the Neutrino Oscillation Experiments

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Status, Results and Future Prospects on the Neutrino Oscillation Experiments Status, results and future prospects on the neutrino oscillation experiments “The new, the rare and the beautiful” Zürich, 6th6th--8th8th January 2010 F. Juget, LHEP Bern Neutrino oscillation experiments • The 1rst idea of neutrino oscillations was put forward by Pontecorvo in 1957 • First experiment Homestake in 1967 using solar neutrino leading to the so-called “Solar Neutrino Problem” • Natural neutrino sources – Solar neutrinos • Homestake, SAGE/GNO, Super-Kamiokande, SNO, Borexino – Atmospheric neutrinos • Super-Kamiokande • Artificial neutrino sources – Reactor neutrinos • Chooz (1 km), KamLAND (180 km) – Long baseline accelerator experiments • K2K (250km), MINOS (730 km), OPERA (730 km) 33--flavourflavour oscillation parameters The neutrino oscillation probability depends on the 4 mixing parameters (θ23 , θ12 , θ13 , δcp ), the masses 2 2 2 differences (∆m ij = m i - m j) and the energy E and the distance L from the source (matter effect). θ12 ν 1 0 0 c 0 s e−iδ c s 0ν e 13 13 12 12 1 c s s c νµ = 0 23 23 0 1 0 − 12 12 0ν2 s c s eiδ c ντ 0 − 23 23 − 13 0 13 0 0 1ν3 Flavor θ23 θ13 , δ C Mass ij = cos( θij ) eigenstates S eigenstates ij = sin( θij ) Oscillation probability P ( ν e → ν e ) L/E Neutrino flavor at L is given by lepton identification in CC interaction Solar neutrinos experiments Experiments only sensitive to νe flavor (CC interaction) Homestake – SK - Gallex/GNO - Sage ⇒Deficit of predicted νννe flux is measured “Solar Neutrino Problem” Predicted ⇒⇒⇒ pp 7Be Measured ⇒⇒⇒ 8B Gallex/Sage Cl SK Solar neutrinos experiments • SNO: Experiment sensitive to 3 flavors (CC+NC interactions) − CC νe + d → p + p + e NC ν x + d → p + n +ν x - measures total 8B ν flux from the Sun - equal cross section for all active ν flavors − − ES ν x + e → νx + e Solar neutrinos experiments • SNO: Experiment sensitive to 3 flavors (CC+NC interactions) ⇐⇐⇐ predicted ⇐⇐⇐ measured In 2001, deficit of νννe flux is also measured, but the total flux is measured using the 3 flavors ⇒⇒⇒ absence of deficit ⇒⇒⇒ Neutrino oscillates νe νµ,τ Solar neutrinos experiments Confirmation with the KamLAND experiment (reactor ν’s) 258 events observed 365.2 ± 23.7 expected (Disappearance confirmed at 99.99%) m2 +0.19 −5 2 ∆ = 7.59−0.21 ×10 eV + 3.1 θ12 = 34 4. − 2.1 degrees Phys.Rev.Lett.101:111301,2008 SOLAR + KAMLAND (Reactor ν’s) Atmospheric neutrinos experiments • «up-down» symetry of the flux • L is linked to zenith angle θ • Flux mainly νµ for high energy ( νµ /νe ~ 2 for E < 1 GeV) Atmospheric neutrinos experiments Super-Kamiokande • L/E dependance • The observed deficit favors the νννµ → ν τττ oscillation (No appearance of νννe flavor is observed) −3 2 −3 2 1.9 10 < ∆ m 23 < 3.0 10 eV 2 sin 2θ23 > 0.9 (90% CL) Atmospheric neutrinos experiments Confirmed by K2K (accelerator neutrino’s) 112 events observed 158.1 ± 9 expected without oscillation −−−3−333 2 −−−3−333 222 1.9 10 < ∆< ∆ m 23 < 3.5 10 eV 2 for sin 2θθθ23 = 1 (90% CL) Atmospheric neutrinos experiments ••ConfirmedConfirmed by MINOS (accelerator neutrino’s) Atmospheric neutrinos experiments • Global results with Super-K, K2K and MINOS data The CHOOZ experiment • Mesurement of the νe flux from nuclear reactor (at 1km) – Search for νe disappearance No observation of oscillation νννe→ν x Confirmation of the non observation of νννµµµ→→→νννe from atmospheric neutrinos ⇒ Limite on θθθ13 2 sin 2θθθ13 < 0.1 ⇒ θθθ13 < 11° (90% CL) 33--flavorflavor oscillation parameters Where are we? What do we know: - There are three families of active, light neutrinos (LEP) 0 2 -5 2 - Solar neutrino oscillations: θθθ121212 ~30 ∆∆∆m12 ~7 10 eV 0 2 -3 2 - Atmospheric (νννµ −−−>−> ν> ν τττ?) oscillations: θθθ232323 ~45 ∆∆∆m23 ~ 2.5 10 eV 0 - Electron neutrino oscillations are small: θθθ131313 <<<10 What we do not know: - Several unknown parameters: θθθ13 (only a limit) δδδcp 2 mass hierarchy sign( ∆m23 ) - Why θθθ12 and θθθ23 angles are large and θθθ13 seems very small or null ? - Is there any CP violating phase in the mixing matrix ? - Absolute mass values? (beta or double beta experiments) Where do we go? • What is currently running 2 •• Improve the precision on the atmospheric parameteparametersrs θθθ232323 and ∆∆∆m23 −−ννµµ disappearance: MINOS (also ννee appearance) −−ννττ appearance: OPERA • Short term (in the next years 2010-2015) •• θθθ131313 measurement θθ1313 < 33°°_ _ -- reactor experiments ((ννee →ννee)) DoubleDouble--Chooz,Chooz, Daya Bay, Reno -- Superbeam experiments: ( ννµµ →ννee)) T2K, NO ννAA • Longer term (>2015?) •• New beams: ββ--beam,beam, νν--factfact 2 θθ1313 , CP violation δδcpcp , mass hierarchy sign( ∆m23 ) The OPERA experiment Goal: First observation of ννντττ appearance in a pure νννµ beam • CNGS (CERN to Gran Sasso) beam νμ beam tuned for the τ appearance at LNGS (730 km away from CERN) Mean νμ energy : 17 GeV Requested to deliver : 22.5 x 10 19 pot (5 years) The OPERA detector is installed in LNGS (Italy) which is the largest underground laboratory in the world 3 The OPERA experiment Goal: First observation of ννντττ appearance in a pure νννµ beam • CNGS (CERN to Gran Sasso) beam νμ beam tuned for the τ appearance at LNGS (730 km away from CERN) Mean νμ energy : 17 GeV Requested to deliver : 22.5 x 10 19 pot (5 years) The OPERA detector is installed in LNGS (Italy) which is the largest underground laboratory in the world • The OPERA target Basic component: OPERA Brick = 57 nuclear emulsion films interleaved by 1 mm thick lead plates Emulsion Film : 2 emulsion layers (44 µm thick) poured on a 10.2 cm 205 µm plastic base 12.5 cm (δx ~1 μm δθ ~1 mrad) 7.5 cm 3 8.3 kg Plastic base The OPERA experiment Goal: First observation of ννντττ appearance in a pure νννµ beam • CNGS (CERN to Gran Sasso) beam νμ beam tuned for the τ appearance at LNGS (730 km away from CERN) Mean νμ energy : 17 GeV Requested to deliver : 22.5 x 10 19 pot (5 years) The OPERA detector is installed in LNGS (Italy) which is the largest underground laboratory in the world • The OPERA target Basic component: OPERA Brick = 57 nuclear emulsion films interleaved by 1 mm thick lead plates Emulsion Film : 2 emulsion layers The OPERA target is composed of 150,036 bricks(44 µm thick) Total target mass : 1.25 kt poured on a 10.2 cm 205 µm plastic base 12.5 cm (δx ~1 μm δθ ~1 mrad) 7.5 cm 3 8.3 kg Plastic base The OPERA experiment 1300 µm Charm events from 2009 run 500 µm µ 4.3 GeV similar topology for νννµµµ ντ event First τ event expected in 2010 Primary vertex νµ CC with 4 prongs Secondary vertex Charged Charm decay into 3 prongs Charm flight length: 4.4 mm θθ1313 measurement • Hint of θ13 >0 in current data? From solar+reactor+atmospheric From MINOS Not really conclusive, effect is 1 or 1.5 σσσ Early evidence or discovery with T2K or reactor exp. θθ1313 measurement • Two complementary approaches: _ •• ννee disappearance reactor experiments: Double Chooz, Daya Bay, Reno 2 2 2 - Depends on sin (2 θθθ13 ) & ∆m31 , weakly on ∆m21 - Measurement is independent of δδδCP 2 - negligible matter effect (1km) - independent of sign( ∆m 13 ) θ ⇒”clean” 13 measurement But neutrino beam is not well know (need near and far detectors) Systematic error dominant •• ννee appearance in ννµµ beam: T2K (250 km), NONO νννA (810 km) -- PPµµµe is a complicated function depending on various parameters 2 -- θ13 measurement is correlated with δδδCP and sign( ∆m 13 ) T2K experiment θ • Main goal: Discovery of non-zero 13 – Increase the current sensitivity by a factor ~10 Off-axis beam (2.5°) Near detector (ND280) Quasi-monochromatic νµ beam (beam characterization) L/E tuned for max sensitivity Small fraction of νe Reduced high-E non-CCQE bckg Far detector (Super-Kamiokande) 250 km from source Cherenkov detector 50 kton Water 20” PMT x 11000 Data taking Starts in 2010 T2K experiment Far detector – Super-Kamiokande T2K experiment sensitivity The next 5 years 2 • If sin 2θ13 >0.01 – evidence very soon – firm observation by 2015 – CP search will be open: new detectors, upgraded beams •If no evidence by 2015 –Need new types of facility (ν-factory, β-beam) – measure the value of δCP (if θ13 ≠0!) 2 – determine the mass hierarchy - sign( ∆m 13 ) (earth matter effect) Conclusion 2 • Still unknown oscillation parameters: θ13 δcp sign( ∆m 13 ) – The others are measured with some accuracy • Upcoming reactor and accelerator neutrino 2 experiments will reach sin 2θ13 ~0.01 (within 5 years) • Even with upgrades these experiments most likely cannot say much on CP violation and Mass Hierarchy – Need new facility and detectors (> 2015?) (remark: Not taken into account LSND results) The oscillation probability including matter effect θ All effects are driven by 13 ! 2 ˆ m2 L 2 2 sin [(1−A)∆] ∆ P ≅ sin 2θ sin θ 13 Oscillation phase ν µ →νe 13 23 2 ∆ ≡ ()1−Aˆ 4E ˆ ˆ Neutrinos + sin ()A∆ sin []()1−A ∆ dominant « on peak » −α sin θ13 ξ sin δCP sin ∆ Anti Nu - Aˆ ()1−Aˆ sin ()Aˆ∆ sin []()1−Aˆ ∆ +α sin θ13 ξ cos δCP cos ∆ Aˆ ()1−Aˆ 2 ˆ 2 2 2 sin ()A∆ +α cos θ23 sin 2θ12 Aˆ2 E 2 ˆ ∆m A ≡ 2 2GF ne α ≡ 21 ∆m2 m2 13 ∆ 13 Matter effect sensitive to : ∆ 2 2-3 10 -2 • Sign of m 13 ξ ≡cos θ13 sin 2θ12 sin 2θ23 ≈Ο )1( • neutrino versus anti-neutrino For the special case of νννµµµ ààà νννe oscillations, we have: In vacuum, at leading order: Pin down CP phase and mass hierarchy A.Ereditato – Neuchatel 21-22 June 2004 Detecting CP violating effects Best method: (in vacuum) 2 it requires : ∆m 12 and sin2 θθθ12 large (LMA solar): OK ! larger effects for long L: 2 nd oscillation maximum however… 2 sin 2θθθ13 small: low statistics and large asymmetry 2 sin 2θθθ13 large: high statistics and small asymmetry impact on the detector design …and: 2 oscillations are governed by ∆m atm , L and E: E ≈≈≈ 5 GeV à L ≈≈≈ 3000 km flux too low with a conventional LBL beam A.Ereditato – Neuchatel 21-22 June 2004 Mass hierarchy from matter oscillations Neutrinos oscillating through matter (MSW effect): - different behavior of different flavors due to the presence of electrons in the medium - additional phase contribution to that caused by the non zero mass states.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Status of the Opera Experiment∗
    Vol. 37 (2006) ACTA PHYSICA POLONICA B No 7 STATUS OF THE OPERA EXPERIMENT ∗ R. Zimmermann on behalf of the OPERA Collaboration Institut für Experimentalphysik, Universität Hamburg D-22761 Hamburg, Germany (Received May 15, 2006) In this article the physics motivation and the detector design of the OPERA experiment will be reviewed. The construction status of the de- tector, which will be situated in the CNGS beam from CERN to the Gran Sasso laboratory, will be reported. A survey on the physics performance will be given and the physics plan in 2006 will be presented. PACS numbers: 14.60.Pq 1. Introduction The CNGS project is designed to search for the νµ ντ oscillation in the parameter region indicated by the SuperKamiokande,↔ Macro and Soudan2 atmospheric neutrino analysis [1–3]. The main goal is to find ντ appearance by direct detection of the τ from ντ CC interactions. One will also search for the subleading νµ νe oscillations, which could be observed if θ13 is close to the present limit↔ from CHOOZ [4] and PaloVerde [5]. In order to reach these goals a νµ beam will be sent from CERN to Gran Sasso. In the Gran Sasso laboratory, the OPERA experiment (CNGS1) is under construction. At the distance of L = 732 km between the CERN and the Gran Sasso laboratory the νµ flux of the beam is optimized to yield a maximum num- ber of CC ντ interactions at Gran Sasso. With a mean beam energy of E = 17 GeV the contamination with ν¯µ is around 2% and with νe (ν¯e) is less than 1%.
    [Show full text]
  • Determination of the Νµ-Spectrum of the CNGS Neutrino Beam by Studying Muon Events in the OPERA Experiment
    Determination of the νµ-spectrum of the CNGS neutrino beam by studying muon events in the OPERA experiment Diplomarbeit der Philosophisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität Bern vorgelegt von Claudia Borer 2008 Leiter der Arbeit: Prof. Dr. Urs Moser Laboratorium für Hochenergiephysik Contents Introduction 1 1 Neutrino Physics 3 1.1 History of the Neutrino . 3 1.2 The Standard Model of particles and interactions . 6 1.3 Beyond the Standard Model . 12 1.3.1 Sources for neutrinos . 14 1.3.2 Two avour neutrino oscillation in vacuum . 14 1.3.3 Three avour neutrino oscillation in vacuum . 17 1.3.4 Neutrino oscillation in matter . 20 2 The OPERA experiment 23 2.1 Expected physics performance . 24 2.1.1 Signal detection eciency . 24 2.1.2 Expected background . 25 2.1.3 Sensitivity to νµ → ντ oscillations . 26 2.2 The CNGS neutrino beam . 27 2.3 The OPERA detector . 28 2.3.1 Emulsion target . 29 2.3.2 The Target Tracker . 31 2.3.3 The muon spectrometers . 33 2.3.4 The veto system . 35 2.3.5 Data acquisition system (DAQ) . 37 3 Analysis methods 39 3.1 Kalman ltering . 39 3.2 Monte Carlo samples . 42 3.3 Producing histogramms . 46 3.4 Unfolding method based on Bayes' Theorem . 47 i ii CONTENTS 4 Physical results 51 Conclusion 57 A Two avour neutrino oscillation in vacuum 59 Acknowledgement 61 List of Figures 63 List of Tables 65 Bibliography 67 Introduction The Standard Model (SM) of particles and interactions successfully describes particle physics. In the last years growing evidence has been established, indicating that the SM must be extended to possibly include new physics.
    [Show full text]
  • Long Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiments 1 Introduction 2
    Long Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiments Mark Thomson Cavendish Laboratory Department of Physics JJ Thomson Avenue Cambridge, CB3 0HE United Kingdom 1 Introduction In the last ten years the study of the quantum mechanical e®ect of neutrino os- cillations, which arises due to the mixing of the weak eigenstates fºe; º¹; º¿ g and the mass eigenstates fº1; º2; º3g, has revolutionised our understanding of neutrinos. Until recently, this understanding was dominated by experimental observations of at- mospheric [1, 2, 3] and solar neutrino [4, 5, 6] oscillations. These measurements have been of great importance. However, the use of naturally occuring neutrino sources is not su±cient to determine fully the flavour mixing parameters in the neutrino sector. For this reason, many of the current and next generation of neutrino experiments are based on high intensity accelerator generated neutrino beams. The ¯rst generation of these long-baseline (LBL) neutrino oscillation experiments, K2K, MINOS and CNGS, are the main subject of this review. The next generation of LBL experiments, T2K and NOºA, are also discussed. 2 Theoretical Background For two neutrino weak eigenstates fº®; º¯g related to two mass eigenstates fºi; ºjg, by a single mixing angle θij, it is simple to show that the survival probability of a neutrino of energy Eº and flavour ® after propagating a distance L through the vacuum is à ! 2 2 2 2 1:27¢mji(eV )L(km) P (º® ! º®) = 1 ¡ sin 2θij sin ; (1) Eº(GeV) 2 2 2 where ¢mji is the di®erence of the squares of the neutrino masses, mj ¡ mi .
    [Show full text]
  • Origin and Status of the Gran Sasso Infn Laboratory
    Subnuclear Physics: Past, Present and Future Pontifical Academy of Sciences, Scripta Varia 119, Vatican City 2014 www.pas.va/content/dam/accademia/pdf/sv119/sv119-votano.pdf OrigL in and Statu s of th e G ran Sass o INF N Lab orat or y LUCIA VOTANO Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso dell’Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Italy Abstract Underground laboratories are the main infrastructures for astroparticle and neutrino physics aiming at the exploration of the highest energy scales – still inaccessible to accelerators - by searching for extremely rare phenomena. The Gran Sasso INFN Laboratory, conceived by Antonino Zichichi approximately 30 years ago, is the largest underground laboratory in the world devoted to astroparticle physics. The main characteristics of the Gran Sasso Laboratory together with an overview of its broad scientific activities will be reviewed. 328 Subnuclear Physics: Past, Present and Future ORIGIN AND STATUS OF THE GRAN SASSO INFN LABORATORY A briefbrief historyhistory off thethe GGranran SassoSasso LaboratoryLaboratory TheThe proposalproposal toto buildbuild a largelarge undergroundunderground LaboratoryLaboratory underunder thethe GranGran SassoSasso massifmassif waswas submittedsuubmbmitted inin latelate 1970s191970s byby thethe thenthen PresidentPresident ofof INFNINFN AntoninoAntonino Zichichi.Zichichi. AtAt tthathat ttimeime tthehe ttunnelunnel underunder thethe GranGran SassoSasso mountainmountountain off thethe Rome-TeramoRome-Teramo highwayhighway waswas underunder constructionconstruction andand thisthis
    [Show full text]
  • Letter of Interest Neutrino Oscillations with Icecube-Deepcore and the Icecube Upgrade
    Snowmass2021 - Letter of Interest Neutrino oscillations with IceCube-DeepCore and the IceCube Upgrade NF Topical Groups: (check all that apply /) (NF1) Neutrino oscillations (NF2) Sterile neutrinos (NF3) Beyond the Standard Model (NF4) Neutrinos from natural sources (NF5) Neutrino properties (NF6) Neutrino cross sections (NF7) Applications (TF11) Theory of neutrino physics (NF9) Artificial neutrino sources (NF10) Neutrino detectors Authors: Tom Stuttard, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Denmark [[email protected]]. D. Jason Koskinen, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Denmark [[email protected]]. On behalf of the IceCube Collaborationy. Neutrino oscillation physics at IceCube: The IceCube neutrino observatory is sensitive to the oscillations of 5 - 100 GeV Earth-crossing atmospheric neutrinos, notably in the νµ ! ντ channel, enabled by the densely instrumented DeepCore 10 Mton sub- array1, as well as potential beyond Standard Model (BSM) flavor transitions up to TeV/PeV energies using 2 the full IceCube array . A broad range of both standard – νµ disappearance, ντ appearance, neutrino mass ordering (NMO) – and BSM oscillation measurements have been published using 1 and 3 year DeepCore data samples3–7, and a new generation of 8 year measurements is underway. Advantages of the IceCube-DeepCore oscillation program include: High statistics: The vast size of the DeepCore detector coupled with the copious natural atmospheric neu- trino flux affords very high neutrino detection rates, yielding >300,000 neutrinos in the current 8 year analyses (complimentary to a 300,000 νµ 0.5-10 TeV sample used for high-energy BSM oscillation stud- ies8). This is orders of magnitude more statistical power than long baseline accelerator experiments, and ∼ 5× larger than previous DeepCore results4.
    [Show full text]
  • Timing Glitches Dog Neutrino Claim
    IN FOCUS NEWS However, if they could be coaxed in a dish to chemotherapy, women who have gone through slow down women’s biological clocks. “Even if make eggs that could successfully be used for premature menopause, or even those experi- you could gain an additional five years of ovar- in vitro fertilization (IVF), it would change the encing normal ageing. Tilly says that follow-up ian function, that would cover most women face of assisted reproduction. studies have confirmed that OSCs exist in the affected by IVF,” notes Tilly. ■ “That’s a huge ‘if’,” admits Tilly. But, he con- ovaries of women well into their 40s. 1. White, Y. A. R. et al. Nature Med. http://dx.doi. tinues, it could mean an unlimited supply of In addition, growing eggs from OSCs in the org/10.1038/nm.2669 (2012). eggs for women who have ovarian tissue that lab would allow scientists to screen for hor- 2. Zou, K. et al. Nature Cell Biol. 11, 631–636 (2009). still hosts OSCs. This group could include can- mones or drugs that might reinvigorate these 3. Johnson, J., Canning, J., Kaneko, T., Pru, J. K. & Tilly, cer patients who have undergone sterilizing cells to keep producing eggs in the body and J. L. Nature 428, 145–150 (2004). TIMING TROUBLE experiment. The initial result suggested that the Two possible sources of error may have aected the results of the GPS receiver neutrinos were reaching the detector 60 nano- OPERA experiment, which measures the arrival time of neutrinos and timing seconds faster than the speed of light would speeding through Earth from CERN to Gran Sasso.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Access Proceedings Journal of Physics: Conference Series
    Nuclear Physics in Astrophysics V IOP Publishing Journal of Physics: Conference Series 337 (2012) 012069 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/337/1/012069 Highlights from Gran Sasso Laboratory Lucia Votano LNGS-INFN, s.s. 17 bis Km 18,910 - 67100 Assergi (AQ) Italy [email protected] Abstract. The Gran Sasso National Laboratory of INFN, between the cities of L‟Aquila and Teramo, Italy, is a research infrastructure mainly dedicated to astroparticle and neutrino physics. It offers the most advanced underground Laboratory in terms of dimensions, complexity and completeness of its infrastructures. A review of the main experiments carried out at LNGS - devoted to neutrino and to nuclear astrophysics - will be given, together with the most recent and relevant scientific results achieved. 1 LNGS Underground Laboratories are the main infrastructures for astroparticle and neutrino physics to explore the highest energy scales not accessible with accelerators, by searching for extremely rare phenomena. INFN Gran Sasso National Laboratory (LNGS) is the largest underground laboratory in the world devoted to astroparticle physics. It is one of the four INFN National Laboratories and it is a worldwide facility for scientists working in one of the twenty experiments currently set there. Located between L‟Aquila and Teramo - at about 120 km far from Rome - the underground structures are on one side of the highway tunnel (10 km long) which crosses the Gran Sasso massif (A24 Teramo-Rome Highway) and consist of three huge experimental halls (each one 100 m long, 20 m large and 18 m high) linked by service tunnels, for a total volume of about 180.000 m3 and a surface of 17.800 m2.
    [Show full text]
  • The ICARUS Experiment
    The ICARUS experiment F. Varanini INFN Padova, Italy on behalf of the ICARUS Collaboration EPS-HEP 2017, July 7th, 2017 The LAr-TPC technology and ICARUS-T600 l ICARUS-T600 is the first large-scale liquid Argon TPC (760 tons of LAr). It is a uniform, self-triggering detector, with high granularity (~mm), 3D imaging capability, and good calorimetry. It is capable of accurately reconstructing a wide variety of ionizing events with complex topologies. l ICARUS concluded in 2013 a successful 3-year run at LNGS, with CNGS beam and cosmic neutrinos. Several relevant physics and technical results have been achieved: Ø Demonstrated the detector performances, especially in νe identification and background rejection Ø Search for LSND-like anomaly with CNGS beam, constraining the LSND 2 2 window to a narrow region at Δms <~ 1 eV . Ø Verification and rejection of the superluminal neutrino claim. l These results have marked a milestone for the LAr-TPC technology with a large impact on the future neutrino and astro-particle physics projects, like the current SBN short base-line neutrino program at FNAL with three LAr-TPCs (SBND, MicroBooNE and ICARUS) and the multi-kt DUNE LAr-TPC detector. l T600 detector underwent an overhauling at CERN before being exposed to ~0.8 GeV Booster ν beam at 600 m from target to definitely test the LSND claim - searching for νµ νe oscillations in the framework of SBN program. 2 ICARUS-T600 at LNGS LNGS -Hall B LN2 storage + cryo (behind) Cathode T600 Warm Electronics TPC wires (anodes) Two identical modules, 4 wire chambers Charge and light detectors • 3.6 x 3.9 x 19.6 m ≈ 275 m3 • 3 ‘’non-destructive’’ readout wire planes per • Total active mass ≈ 476 ton TPC, wires at 0°, ±60° (Ind1, Ind2, Coll.
    [Show full text]
  • Measurement of Neutrino Oscillations in Atmospheric Neutrinos with the Icecube Deepcore Detector
    Measurement of neutrino oscillations in atmospheric neutrinos with the IceCube DeepCore detector Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades doctor rerum naturalium ( Dr. rer. nat.) im Fach Physik eingereicht an der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschafltichen Fakultät I der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin von B.Sc. Juan Pablo Yáñez Garza Präsident der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin: Prof. Dr. Jan-Hendrik Olbertz Dekan der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät I: Prof. Stefan Hecht, Ph.D. Gutachter: 1. Prof. Dr. Hermann Kolanoski 2. Prof. Dr. Allan Halgren 3. Prof. Dr. Thomas Lohse Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 02.06.2014 iii Abstract The study of neutrino oscillations is an active Ąeld of research. During the last couple of decades many experiments have measured the efects of oscillations, pushing the Ąeld from the discovery stage towards an era of precision and deeper understanding of the phe- nomenon. The IceCube Neutrino Observatory, with its low energy subarray, DeepCore, has the possibility of contributing to this Ąeld. IceCube is a 1 km3 ice Cherenkov neutrino telescope buried deep in the Antarctic glacier. DeepCore, a region of denser instrumentation in the lower center of IceCube, permits the detection of neutrinos with energies as low as 10 GeV. Every year, thousands of atmospheric neutrinos around these energies leave a strong signature in DeepCore. Due to their energy and the distance they travel before being detected, these neutrinos can be used to measure the phenomenon of oscillations. This work starts with a study of the potential of IceCube DeepCore to measure neutrino oscillations in diferent channels, from which the disappearance of νµ is chosen to move forward.
    [Show full text]
  • Results from the OPERA Experiment in the CNGS Beam
    universe Review Results from the OPERA Experiment in the CNGS Beam Alessandro Paoloni on Behalf of OPERA Collaboration † INFN—Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare—Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, I-00044 Frascati (RM), Italy; [email protected] † The OPERA collaboration author list: Agafonova, N.; Alexandrov, A.; Anokhina, A.; Aoki, S.; Ariga, A.; Ariga, T.; Bertolin, A.; Bozza, C.; Brugnera, R.; Buonaura, A.; Buontempo, S.; Chernyavskiy, M.; Chukanov, A.; Consiglio, L.; D’Ambrosio, N.; De Lellis, G.; De Serio, M.; Del Amo Sanchez, P.; Di Crescenzo, A.; Di Ferdinando, D.; Di Marco, N.; Dmitrievsky, S.; Dracos, M.; Duchesneau, D.; Dusini, S.; Dzhatdoev, T.; Ebert, J.; Ereditato, A.; Fini, R. A.; Fornari, F.; Fukuda, T.; Galati, G.; Garfagnini, A.; Gentile, V.; Goldberg, J.; Gorbunov, S.; Gornushkin, Y.; Grella, G.; Guler, A. M.; Gustavino, C.; Hagner, C.; Hara, T.; Hayakawa, T.; Hollnagel, A.; Ishiguro, K.; Iuliano, A.; Jakovˇci´c,K.; Jollet, C.; Kamiscioglu, C.; Kamiscioglu, M.; Kim, S. H.; Kitagawa, N.; Kliˇcek,B.; Kodama, K.; Komatsu, M.; Kose, U.; Kreslo, I.; Laudisio, F.; Lauria, A.; Ljubiˇci´c,A.; Longhin, A.; Loverre, P.F.; Malgin, A.; Mandrioli, G.; Matsuo, T.; Matveev, V.; Mauri, N.; Medinaceli, E.; Meregaglia, A.; Mikado, S.; Miyanishi, M.; Mizutani, F.; Monacelli, P.; Montesi, M. C.; Morishima, K.; Muciaccia, M. T.; Naganawa, N.; Naka, T.; Nakamura, M.; Nakano, T.; Niwa, K.; Ogawa, S.; Okateva, N.; Ozaki, K.; Paparella, L.; Park, B. D.; Pasqualini, L.; Pastore, A.; Patrizii, L.; Pessard, H.; Podgrudkov, D.; Polukhina, N.; Pozzato, M.; Pupilli, F.; Roda, M.; Roganova, T.; Rokujo, H.; Rosa, G.; Ryazhskaya, O.; Sato, O.; Schembri, A.; Shakiryanova, I.; Shchedrina, T.; Shibayama, E.; Shibuya, H.; Shiraishi, T.; Simone, S.; Sirignano, C.; Sirri, G.; Sotnikov, A.; Spinetti, M.; Stanco, L.; Starkov, N.; Stellacci, S.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Long-Baseline Accelerator Neutrino Experiments∗
    History of Long-Baseline Accelerator Neutrino Experiments∗ Gary J. Feldman Department of Physics, Harvard University, 17 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, United States I will discuss the six previous and present long-baseline neutrino experiments: two first- generation general experiments, K2K and MINOS, two specialized experiments, OPERA and ICARUS, and two second-generation general experiments, T2K and NOνA. The motivations for and goals of each experiment, the reasons for the choices that each experiment made, and the outcomes will be discussed. 1 Introduction My assignment in this conference is to discuss the history of the six past and present long- baseline neutrino experiments. Both Japan and the United States have hosted first- and second- generation general experiments, K2K and T2K in Japan and MINOS and NOνA in the United States. Europe hosted two more-specialized experiments, OPERA and ICARUS. Since the only possible reason to locate a detector hundreds of kilometers from the neutrino beam target is to study neutrino oscillations, the discussion will be limited to that topic, although each of these experiments investigated other topics. Also due to the time limitation, with one exception, I will not discuss sterile neutrino searches. These experiment have not found any evidence for sterile neutrinos to date.1;2;3;4;5;6;7 The Japanese and American hosted experiments have used the comparison between a near and far de- tector to measure the effects of oscillations. This is an essential method of reducing systematic uncertain- ties, since uncertainties due flux, cross sections, and efficiencies will mostly cancel. The American experi- ments used functionally equivalent near detectors and the Japanese experiments used detectors that were func- tionally equivalent, fine-grained, or both.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of the OPERA Neutrino Experiment
    LAPP-EXP-2009-10 September 2009 Status of the OPERA neutrino experiment H. Pessard on behalf of the OPERA Collaboration LAPP - Université de Savoie - CNRS/ IN2P3 BP. 110, F-74941 Annecy-le-Vieux Cedex, France E-mail: [email protected] The OPERA long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiment is located in the underground Gran Sasso laboratory in Italy. OPERA has been designed to give the first direct proof of appearance, looking at the CNGS beam 730 km away from its source at CERN. The apparatus consists of a large set of emulsion-lead targets combined with electronic detectors. First runs in 2007 and 2008 helped checking that detector and related emulsion facilities are fully operational and led to successful first analysis of collected data. This paper, after a short description of the OPERA setup and methods, gives an updated status report on data reconstruction and analysis applied to available samples of neutrino events Presented at European Physical Society Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics EPS-HEP 2009 Krakow (Poland), 16-22 July 2009 Status of the OPERA neutrino experiment Henri Pessard 1. The CNGS program and OPERA Following the discovery of oscillations with atmospheric neutrinos by Super-Kamiokande in 1998, accelerator neutrino projects developed in Japan and the USA to measure the disappearance at long distance. The disappearance signal is now confirmed by K2K and MINOS. In Europe, long baseline projects focused on the appearance in a beam. They led to the construction of the CNGS (CERN Neutrinos to Gran Sasso) beam at CERN, whose main physics objective is to prove explicitly the nature of the atmospheric oscillation.
    [Show full text]