DOCSLIB.ORG

Mountain Whitefish Overwintering Habitat Use in the Mcleod River

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mountain Whitefish Overwintering Habitat Use in the Mcleod River Mountain Whitefish Overwintering Habitat Use in the McLeod River Mountain Whitefish Overwintering Habitat Use in the McLeod River Brittany Schmidt, Kevin Fitzsimmons, and Andrew Paul Alberta Conservation Association 101 – 9 Chippewa Road Sherwood Park, Alberta, Canada T8A 6J7 Report Editors PETER AKU GLENDA SAMUELSON Alberta Conservation Association R.R. #2 101 – 9 Chippewa Rd. Craven, SK S0G 0W0 Sherwood Park, AB T8A 6J7 Conservation Report Series Type Data ISBN: 978-1-989448-04-5 Reproduction and Availability: This report and its contents may be reproduced in whole, or in part, provided that this title page is included with such reproduction and/or appropriate acknowledgements are provided to the authors and sponsors of this project. Suggested Citation: Schmidt, B., K. Fitzsimmons, and A. Paul. 2019. Mountain whitefish overwintering habitat use in the McLeod River. Data Report produced by Alberta Conservation Association, Sherwood Park, Alberta, Canada. 19 pp + App. Cover photo credit: David Fairless Digital copies of conservation reports can be obtained from: Alberta Conservation Association 101 – 9 Chippewa Rd. Sherwood Park, AB T8A 6J7 Toll Free: 1-877-969-9091 Tel: (780) 410-1998 Fax: (780) 464-0990 Email: [email protected] Website: www.ab-conservation.com Alberta Innovates and Her Majesty the Queen in right of Alberta make no warranty, express or implied, nor assume any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information contained in this publication, nor for any use thereof that infringes on privately owned rights. The views and opinions of the author expressed herein do not reflect those of Alberta Innovates or Her Majesty the Queen in right of Alberta. The directors, officers, employees, agents and consultants of Alberta Innovates and the Government of Alberta are exempted, excluded and absolved from all liability for damage or injury, howsoever caused, to any person in connection with or arising out of the use by that person for any purpose of this publication or its contents. i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY As demand continues to grow for industrial, agricultural, and domestic water use, Albertans are seeking strategies to manage water needs into the future. One of the primary tasks in water management is determining the instream flow needs of an ecosystem so that managers can seek to meet socio-economic needs, while maintaining the ecological integrity of a watershed. In 2014-15, Alberta Environment and Parks (AEP) determined overwintering areas and microhabitat characteristics for mountain whitefish (MNWH) in the Wapiti River and developed a resource selection function (RSF) model to predict winter instream flow needs. Mountain whitefish were selected as a species of focus due to their tendency to occupy areas of faster moving water, which could make them more sensitive to changes in flow. The resulting RSF model showed MNWH were sensitive to water withdrawals during low winter flows. Alberta Conservation Association (ACA), in collaboration with AEP, developed the current project to validate the results from the Wapiti River. We conducted a telemetry survey on the McLeod River, where we tagged and tracked MNWH throughout the winter of 2017-18 to determine overwintering habitat. We collected under-ice habitat data at tagged fish locations, as well as at additional sites available to fish within the study area. We used this data to develop an RSF model to determine if MNWH overwintering habitat in the McLeod River could be predicted by a set of parameters. Results from our telemetry survey indicate that fish movement varied from 9 km upstream to 89 km downstream of initial tagging locations, with fish travelling greater distances from September to November than from November to March as they moved into overwintering habitat. Our RSF model found MNWH habitat use to be predicted by depth and dominant substrate, with fish showing preference for shallower habitats with larger particle sized substrate. Our data provides valuable information with regards to under-ice movement and overwintering habitat preference for MNWH and can be used in future management decisions with regards to winter instream flow needs. Key words: Mountain whitefish, McLeod River, instream flow needs, IFN, resource selection function, RSF ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work was funded by Alberta Innovates – Water Innovation Program and Fisheries and Oceans Canada. We thank Alberta Conservation Association (ACA) employees Scott Seward, Mike Ranger, Nikita Lebedynski, Zach Spence, Jon Van Dyk, Troy Furukawa, and Brendan Ganton for their assistance in project development and data collection. We received valuable project support from Lauren Makowecki (Alberta Environment and Parks) and Dallas Johnson (Alberta Innovates). Thank you to the Stone Family who welcomed us into their cabin where we were able to test our telemetry equipment. Thanks to Dave Martell (Millar Western Forest Products Ltd. Whitecourt Pump Division) for granting us river access to our fixed receiver. We also thank the numerous landowners who provided access to the McLeod River through their properties. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................................................... iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................... iv LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................................... v LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................................... vi LIST OF APPENDICES ...........................................................................................................................vii 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 STUDY AREA ................................................................................................................................... 2 3.0 MATERIALS AND METHODS ...................................................................................................... 4 3.1 Fish tagging ................................................................................................................................... 4 3.2 Telemetry and habitat use survey .............................................................................................. 4 3.3 Habitat availability survey .......................................................................................................... 6 3.4 Resource selection function modelling ..................................................................................... 8 4.0 RESULTS ............................................................................................................................................ 8 4.1 Tag detection and fish movement .............................................................................................. 8 4.2 Habitat use and availability ...................................................................................................... 12 4.3 Resource selection function models ......................................................................................... 13 5.0 SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................... 17 6.0 LITERATURE CITED ..................................................................................................................... 18 7.0 APPENDICES .................................................................................................................................. 20 iv LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. McLeod River study area including initial fish tagging locations. Inset map shows location of the study area within the province of Alberta. ............................. 3 Figure 2. McLeod River study area divided into mesohabitat types determined via aerial survey. ................................................................................................................................ 7 Figure 3. Locations of tagged mountain whitefish along the McLeod River during aerial survey, March 2018. ....................................................................................................... 10 Figure 4. Maximum distance (km) travelled by mountain whitefish in the McLeod River between aerial surveys from September 2017 to March 2018. ................................. 11 Figure 5. Distance travelled (km) by mountain whitefish in the McLeod River reported by month. .............................................................................................................................. 11 Figure 6. Summary of dominant substrate type at habitat use and available habitat sites for mountain whitefish in the McLeod River, 2018. ........................................................ 12 Figure 7. Relative probability of mountain whitefish use by depth in the McLeod River, 2018, as predicted using the top model including depth and substrate as covariates. Grey points are preference points from observed data. ........................ 16 Figure 8. Relative probability of mountain
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ES3 - Rivers, Creeks and Streams Waterbody Waterbody Detail Season Bait WALL NRPK BURB GOLD MNWH RNTR BKTR Athabasca River Upstream of Sec
    Legend: As examples, ‘3 over 63 cm’ indicates a possession and size limit of ‘3 fish each over 63 cm’ or ‘10 fish’ indicates a possession limit of 10 for that species of any size. An empty cell indicates the species is not likely present at that waterbody; however, if caught the default regulations for the Watershed Unit apply. SHL=Special Harvest Licence, BKTR = Brook Trout, BNTR=Brown Trout, BURB = Burbot, CISC = Cisco, CTTR = Cutthroat Trout, DLVR = Dolly Varden, GOLD = Goldeye, LKTR = Lake Trout, LKWH = Lake Whitefish, MNWH = Mountain Whitefish, NRPK = Northern Pike, RNTR = Rainbow Trout, SAUG = Sauger, TGTR = Tiger Trout, WALL = Walleye, YLPR = Yellow Perch. Regulation changes are highlighted blue. Waterbodies closed to angling are highlighted grey. ES3 - Rivers, Creeks and Streams Waterbody Waterbody Detail Season Bait WALL NRPK BURB GOLD MNWH RNTR BKTR Athabasca River Upstream of Sec. Rd. 658 (near Whitecourt) to Jasper National Park OPEN APR. 1 to AUG. 31 Bait ban 0 fish 0 fish 0 fish 0 fish 5 over 30 cm 0 fish 2 fish Boundary mainstem river only (including Brule Lake) Upstream of Sec. Rd. 658 (near Whitecourt) to Jasper National Park OPEN SEPT. 1 to OCT. 31 Bait ban 0 fish 0 fish 0 fish 0 fish 5 over 30 cm 0 fish 0 fish Boundary mainstem river only (including Brule Lake) Berland River Mainstem only - downstream of Hwy 40 OPEN APR. 1 to OCT. 31 Bait ban 3 over 3 over 5 over 30 cm 0 fish 50 cm 63 cm Bigoray River Mainstem including tributaries OPEN JUNE 16 to OCT.
    [Show full text]
  • Alberta Watersmart
    Alberta Innovates A Roadmap for Sustainable Water Management in the Athabasca River Basin Submitted by: Dr. P. Kim Sturgess, C.M., P.Eng., FCAE CEO WaterSMART Solutions Ltd. 605, 839 5th Ave SW Calgary, Alberta T2P 3C8 [email protected] Submitted to: Dallas Johnson Director, Integrated Land Management Alberta Innovates 1800 Phipps McKinnon Building 10020 – 101A Avenue Edmonton, Alberta T5J 3G2 [email protected] Submitted on: September 28, 2018 The Sustainable Water Management in the Athabasca River Basin Initiative was enabled through core funding provided by Alberta Innovates and matching funds contributed by the Alberta Energy Regulator, Alberta Environment and Parks, ATCO, Repsol Oil and Gas, Suncor Energy, and Westmoreland Coal Company. This report is available and may be freely downloaded from http://albertawatersmart.com/featured- projects/collaborative-watershed-management.html Alberta Innovates (Al) and Her Majesty the Queen in right of Alberta make no warranty, express or implied, nor assume any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information contained in this publication, nor that use thereof infringe on privately owned rights. The views and opinions of the author expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of AI or Her Majesty the Queen in right of Alberta. The directors, officers, employees, agents and consultants of AI and the Government of Alberta are exempted, excluded and absolved from all liability for damage or injury, howsoever caused, to any person in connection with or arising out of the use by that person for any purpose of this publication or its contents. Suggested citation for this report: WaterSMART Solutions Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • HDP 2006 05 Report 1
    Report #1 1998 CWS Air Surveys In response to a general lack of knowledge on the abundance and distribution of the Harlequin Duck within Alberta, the Canadian Wildlife Service in cooperation with Alberta Environment undertook helicopter surveys of the eastern slopes of Alberta in 1998 and 1999. In 1998 the survey area encompassed streams along the eastern slopes of Alberta between the communities of Grande Cache and Nordegg. Ground truthing was provided by foot surveys on the McLeod River conducted by Bighorn Wildlife Technologies Ltd. Local area biologists helped with selection of blocks of streams to be surveyed where harlequins were most likely to occur and assisted in the helicopter surveys. Helicopter survey methods are detailed in Gregoire et al. (1999). Global Positioning Coordinates (GPS) were recorded for all sightings as well as survey start and end points. The Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) coordinate system was used for recording sightings of Harlequin Duck and other wildlife. Survey start and end points were recorded in Latitude and Longitude. Five digit numbers hand written in the field survey reports represent the BSOD (now WHIMIS) ID number for that observation. What this document contains. - A summary of the 1998 surveys (Gregoire et al. 1999. Canadian Wildlife Service Technical Report Series No. 329), - The field results for the helicopter survey conducted between the Brazeau and North Saskatchewan Rivers - The results of a foot survey on the Blackstone River. , · Harlequin L?.uck ·surveys in the Centr~I - .Eastern Slopes o.f Albert9: . ·Spring 1998. T - • ~ Paul Gr~goire, Jeff Kneteman and Jim Allen . .-"• r, ~ ~-. Prairie and Northern Region 1999 .1;._-, - 1 ,~ .Canadian Wildlife Service '' ,· ~: ,.
    [Show full text]
  • Section a – Project Introduction
    Section A – Project Introduction Mercoal West and Yellowhead Tower Section A – Project Introduction Mine Extension Project TABLE OF CONTENTS A PROJECT INTRODUCTION......................................................................................... 1 A.1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 A.2 PROJECT PROPONENT............................................................................................... 2 A.2.1 Coal Valley Resources Inc................................................................................. 2 A.2.2 Sherritt International Corporation...................................................................... 2 A.2.3 Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan Board .............................................................. 2 A.3 PROJECT NEED AND ALTERNATIVES ................................................................... 3 A.3.1 Project Need....................................................................................................... 3 A.3.2 Project Alternatives............................................................................................ 4 A.4 APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL ............................................................................... 5 A.4.1 Applicant Information........................................................................................ 6 A.4.2 Existing Approvals............................................................................................. 6 A.4.3 Request for Approval
    [Show full text]
  • Company Cover Page for Deliverables Templates
    www.terrahdd.com ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENT GEOTECHNICAL CONSTRUCTION-SUPERVISION Project: 2021 NGTL System Expansion Project Document Title: HDD Feasibility Report - Mcleod River Crossing Report Number: 00796-THD-C-RP-0013_2020-09-09 Rev No Description Rev Date Originator Reviewer Approver 0 ISSUED FOR USE SEPT. 09 2020 PL/PP SG/PP/BR SG TerraHDD SOLUTIONS INC. “Your Trenchless Solutions Provider” 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 3 Table of Contents 2 SCOPE OF WORK .................................................................................................................. 3 3 GEOTECHNICAL/GEOPHYSICAL PROGRAM ........................................................................... 4 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION .................................................................................................................. 4 GEOPHYSICAL INVESTIGATION ..................................................................................................................... 6 GROUNDWATER ........................................................................................................................................... 6 4 SITE CONDITIONS AND HDD DESIGN SUMMARY ................................................................... 7 5 HDD DESIGN CRITERIA ......................................................................................................... 8 DESIGN BASIS ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Northern River Basins Study - Alberta Environment
    Northern River Basins Study - Alberta Environment Contact Us Search Location: Alberta Government > Environment > Water > Northern River Basins Study Air | Land | Water | Climate Change | Waste | About Us | Quick Links Advisories Online Reporting Last Review/Updated: February 28, 2007 Northern River Basins Study Following the closing of the Northern River Basins Study Office in June 1996, Alberta Environment is ensuring that the study findings from this publicly funded research program are made available to the general public through a wide range of avenues. This Web page is presented to communicate Northern River some basic information about the study and to display the Final Report. The departmental review is underway on this report and its recommendations as well as on other component reports of the Basins Study study. For additional information about the Northern River Basins Study, please contact the Alberta Final Report Environment Information Centre by e-mail at [email protected] , by phone at (780) 427- Table of Contents 22700 or by Fax at (780) 422-4086 or you can write to: (Report updated Alberta Environment, based on errata Information Centre, Main Floor to July 8, 1996) 9820 - 106 Street, Edmonton, Alberta T5K 2J6 What is the Northern River Basins Study? The Northern River Basins Study (NRBS) is a four-and-one-half year, $12-million project that examined the relationships between industrial, agricultural, municipal and other development, and the Peace, Athabasca and Slave River basins. Who funded the Study? The Study was co-funded by the governments of Canada and Alberta. The government of the Northwest Territories also participated in the Study.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality in the North Saskatchewan River (NSR) in the Last 60 Years Has Undergone Some Substantial Changes
    North Saskatchewan River Water Quality By: Steph Neufeld, M.Sc., Watershed Specialist, EPCOR Water Services Biography Steph Neufeld was born and raised on a farm near the McLeod River where she spent many summer days and nights on her banks or navigating through her waters. She completed both her undergraduate and masters degrees at the University of Alberta. Her M.Sc. degree investigated the effects of landuse change on water quality and aquatic insect communities in Alberta streams. After graduation, Steph worked in consulting as an Aquatic Biologist for several years and currently works as a Watershed Specialist for EPCOR Water Services where her focus is on drinking water source water protection and watershed management. She presently sits on the Integrated Watershed Management Plan steering committee for the North Saskatchewan Watershed Alliance, is president of the Alberta Lake Management Society, and a board member for RiverWatch. Abstract Water quality in the North Saskatchewan River (NSR) in the last 60 years has undergone some substantial changes. Water quality monitoring was first initiated in the 1940s in response to pollution problems in the NSR associated with the City of Edmonton. At that time municipal wastewater, which included domestic sewage and industrial wastes, received only primary treatment. Untreated sewage was discharged directly into the river during rainfall events, garbage was disposed along the river bank, and accidental oil spills at industrial sites were not uncommon. With these pressures, it is not surprising that water quality was poor. These conditions persistent until about 1960 when waste management was improved and flow‐ regulation by the newly constructed Brazeau dam increased winter flows and assimilation capacity during this critical time.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Review Juvenile and Subadult Bull Trout and Pacific Lamprey Movement Studies
    LITERATURE REVIEW JUVENILE AND SUBADULT BULL TROUT AND PACIFIC LAMPREY MOVEMENT STUDIES Final RESOURCE DOCUMENT March 1, 2005 Prepared by: BioAnalysts, Inc. Eagle, Idaho Prepared for: Public Utility District No. 1 of Chelan County Wenatchee, Washington Literature Review Bull Trout and Pacific Lamprey TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................3 BULL TROUT LITERATURE REVIEW.................................................................................. 4 LAMPREY LITERATURE REVIEW ..................................................................................... 11 CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................................... 12 BULL TROUT REFERENCES ............................................................................................. 13 LAMPREY REFERENCES................................................................................................... 17 APPENDIX ........................................................................................................................... 19 BioAnalysts, Inc. page i Chelan County PUD No. 1 Literature Review Bull Trout and Pacific Lamprey INTRODUCTION The Chelan County Public Utility District (CPUD) is interested in studies that have assessed potential dam or reservoir effects on juvenile (subadult) bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) and juvenile Pacific lamprey (Lampetra tridentata). The scope of this literature
    [Show full text]
  • CADOMIN Area Structure Plan
    CADOMIN Area Structure Plan Lovatt Planning Consultants Inc. May 2012 CADOMIN Area Structure Plan Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Purpose ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Plan Background ......................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Regional Context ......................................................................................................... 1 1.4 Historical Context ........................................................................................................ 2 1.5 Process ........................................................................................................................ 2 1.6 Plan Organization ........................................................................................................ 3 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS..................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Population ................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Physical Features ......................................................................................................... 4 2.3 Municipal Services .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Rockies
    TransCanada Ecotours® TransCanada “This book wonderfully Let the Northern Rockies Ecotour set your compass Discover the secrets of a spectacular interlaces the physical, for a remarkable journey of discovery through the Canadian landscape with the biological and historical northern part of the Canadian Rocky Mountain qualities of one of Parks World Heritage site. 265 photos, 22 maps and TransCanada Ecotours® Canada’s iconic regions. 133 Ecopoints present the region’s rich First Nations An entertaining but highly history, exploits of early fur-traders, artists, mission- aries, tourists, and scientists, and the ongoing inter- educational account that Northern play of people, wildlife and their inspiring mountain will captivate all who ecosystem. The authors draw on current research traverse the Northern to discuss key environmental issues such as climate Rockies be it by bike, car, Rockies change and biodiversity conservation. train or vicariously from their living room.” You will explore the eastern foothills (Chapter One) Highway Guide ending in historic Grande Cache, then travel west on NIK LOPOUKHINE CHAIR IUCN WORLD COMMISSION the Yellowhead Highway (Chapter Two) following ON PROTECTED AREAS major rivers across the continental divide from Hinton Guide Northern Rockies Highway to Valemount, British Columbia. In the concluding Chapter Three, the Ecotour turns southwards from Jasper along the spectacular Icefields Parkway through the Rockies, ending near Lake Louise. See the full route map on page 5 INSTITUTE RESEARCH FOOTHILLS $24.95 P.O. Box 6330 A lavishly illustrated driving guide 133 points of interest, 265 photos, 1176 Switzer Drive to the landscapes, geology, ecology, 22 maps that include: Hinton, Alberta T7V 1X6 culture, people and history of the Hinton – Cadomin – Grande Cache – Canada Northern Rockies Region of Alberta Jasper – Valemount – and the and British Columbia.
    [Show full text]
  • Contact Whitehorse Wildland Camping Backcountry Safety Hiking Equestrian Use Wildlife & Natural Features Park Access
    Pristine alpine meadows, sub-alpine Park Guide forests, and clear mountain streams Park Access Wildlife Backcountry Contact make Whitehorse Wildland Provincial Park a backcountry paradise. This 175 km2 protected area provides Whitehorse Wildland Park is located southwest & Natural Safety Alberta Parks prime habitat for bighorn sheep, of the town of Hinton. It is bordered on the west Web: albertaparks.ca by Jasper National Park. Travel through the Hinton Parks Office: 780-865-8395 Whitehorse grizzly bears and harlequin ducks. Features The wild and rugged nature of Whitehorse small town of Cadomin to Whitehorse Creek Visitor Centre: 780-865-5600 Provincial Recreation Area with a campground Wildland Park is a draw for many visitors. Yet, Toll Free: 1-866-427-3582 Other special features include backcountry dangers can provide a challenge for and equestrian facilities. This staging area marks Wildland Whitehorse Wildland Park is home to many even the most seasoned outdoor enthusiasts. rare plants, alpine flowers, marine the main access point into Whitehorse Wildland Fire Bans in Alberta fossils, limestone caves with bat wildlife species including elk, moose, mule deer, Web: albertafirebans.ca Provincial Park Park. If you continue past Whitehorse Creek bighorn sheep, grizzly bear, wolves, cougars, • Only minimal trail maintenance occurs. hibernacula, the Cardinal Divide PRA for 20 km, you will reach the Cardinal Divide The network of trails and mountainous terrain hoary marmot and pika. The Park also provides Emergency (Police, Fire, Ambulance) Viewpoint. Be aware that gravel roads can be can be disorienting. Viewpoint, and the Fiddle Pass breeding habitat for harlequin ducks dependent Phone: 911 route to Miette Hotsprings.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of the Arctic Grayling (Thymallus Arcticus) in Alberta [2005]
    Status of the Arctic Grayling (Thymallus arcticus) in Alberta Alberta Wildlife Status Report No. 57 Status of the Arctic Grayling (Thymallus arcticus) in Alberta Prepared for: Alberta Sustainable Resource Development (SRD) Alberta Conservation Association (ACA) Prepared by: Jordan Walker This report has been reviewed, revised, and edited prior to publication. It is an SRD/ACA working document that will be revised and updated periodically. Alberta Wildlife Status Report No. 57 March 2005 Published By: i Publication No. T/070 ISBN: 0-7785-3674-2 (Printed Edition) ISBN: 0-7785-3675-0 (On-line Edition) ISSN: 1206-4912 (Printed Edition) ISSN: 1499-4682 (On-line Edition) Series Editors: Sue Peters, Nyree Sharp and Robin Gutsell Illustrations: Brian Huffman Maps: Jane Bailey For copies of this report,visit our web site at : http://www3.gov.ab.ca/srd/fw/speciesatrisk/ and click on “Detailed Status” OR Contact: Information Centre - Publications Alberta Environment/Alberta Sustainable Resource Development Fish and Wildlife Division Main Floor, Great West Life Building 9920 - 108 Street Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T5K 2M4 Telephone: (780) 422-2079 This publication may be cited as: Alberta Sustainable Resource Development. 2005. Status of the Arctic grayling (Thymallus arcticus) in Alberta. Alberta Sustainable Resource Development, Fish and Wildlife Division, and Alberta Conservation Association, Wildlife Status Report No. 57, Edmonton, AB. 41 pp. ii PREFACE Every five years, the Fish and Wildlife Division of Alberta Sustainable Resource Development reviews the general status of wildlife species in Alberta. These overviews, which have been conducted in 1991 (The Status of Alberta Wildlife), 1996 (The Status of Alberta Wildlife) and 2000 (The General Status of Alberta Wild Species 2000), assign individual species “ranks” that reflect the perceived level of risk to populations that occur in the province.
    [Show full text]